literature review in study

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved June 7, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, what is your plagiarism score.

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing a Literature Review

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.

Where, when, and why would I write a lit review?

There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.

A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.

Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.

What are the parts of a lit review?

Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.

Introduction:

• An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
• A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
• Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published, standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research paper)
• Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.

Conclusion:

• Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance
• Connect it back to your primary research question

How should I organize my lit review?

Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:

• Chronological : The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
• Thematic : If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women.
• Qualitative versus quantitative research
• Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources
• Theoretical : In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research.

What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review?

Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .

As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.

Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:

• It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
• Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying to each other?
• Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often
• Read more about synthesis here.

The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.

Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library

• Collections
• Research Help

YSN Doctoral Programs: Steps in Conducting a Literature Review

• Biomedical Databases
• Global (Public Health) Databases
• Soc. Sci., History, and Law Databases
• Grey Literature
• Trials Registers
• Data and Statistics
• Public Policy
• Google Tips
• Recommended Books
• Steps in Conducting a Literature Review

What is a literature review?

A literature review is an integrated analysis -- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related directly to your research question.  That is, it represents a synthesis of the evidence that provides background information on your topic and shows a association between the evidence and your research question.

A literature review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the assignment.  Rely heavily on the guidelines your instructor has given you.

Why is it important?

A literature review is important because it:

• Explains the background of research on a topic.
• Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area.
• Discovers relationships between research studies/ideas.
• Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
• Identifies critical gaps and points of disagreement.
• Discusses further research questions that logically come out of the previous studies.

APA7 Style resources

APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers

1. Choose a topic. Define your research question.

Your literature review should be guided by your central research question.  The literature represents background and research developments related to a specific research question, interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way.

• Make sure your research question is not too broad or too narrow.  Is it manageable?
• Begin writing down terms that are related to your question. These will be useful for searches later.
• If you have the opportunity, discuss your topic with your professor and your class mates.

2. Decide on the scope of your review

How many studies do you need to look at? How comprehensive should it be? How many years should it cover? 

• This may depend on your assignment.  How many sources does the assignment require?

3. Select the databases you will use to conduct your searches.

Make a list of the databases you will search. 

Where to find databases:

• use the tabs on this guide
• Find other databases in the Nursing Information Resources web page
• More on the Medical Library web page
• ... and more on the Yale University Library web page

4. Conduct your searches to find the evidence. Keep track of your searches.

• Use the key words in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as terms in your search. Use the database tutorials for help.
• Save the searches in the databases. This saves time when you want to redo, or modify, the searches. It is also helpful to use as a guide is the searches are not finding any useful results.
• Review the abstracts of research studies carefully. This will save you time.
• Use the bibliographies and references of research studies you find to locate others.
• Check with your professor, or a subject expert in the field, if you are missing any key works in the field.
• Ask your librarian for help at any time.
• Use a citation manager, such as EndNote as the repository for your citations. See the EndNote tutorials for help.

Review the literature

Some questions to help you analyze the research:

• What was the research question of the study you are reviewing? What were the authors trying to discover?
• Was the research funded by a source that could influence the findings?
• What were the research methodologies? Analyze its literature review, the samples and variables used, the results, and the conclusions.
• Does the research seem to be complete? Could it have been conducted more soundly? What further questions does it raise?
• If there are conflicting studies, why do you think that is?
• How are the authors viewed in the field? Has this study been cited? If so, how has it been analyzed?

Tips: 

• Review the abstracts carefully.  
• Keep careful notes so that you may track your thought processes during the research process.
• Create a matrix of the studies for easy analysis, and synthesis, across all of the studies.
• << Previous: Recommended Books
• Last Updated: Jan 4, 2024 10:52 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.yale.edu/YSNDoctoral

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Dissertation
• What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples

What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples

Published on 22 February 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 7 June 2022.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research.

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarise sources – it analyses, synthesises, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Upload your document to correct all your mistakes.

Table of contents

Why write a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1: search for relevant literature, step 2: evaluate and select sources, step 3: identify themes, debates and gaps, step 4: outline your literature review’s structure, step 5: write your literature review, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a dissertation or thesis, you will have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position yourself in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your dissertation addresses a gap or contributes to a debate

You might also have to write a literature review as a stand-alone assignment. In this case, the purpose is to evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of scholarly debates around a topic.

The content will look slightly different in each case, but the process of conducting a literature review follows the same steps. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research objectives and questions .

If you are writing a literature review as a stand-alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct your search. Unlike a dissertation research question, this question has to be answerable without collecting original data. You should be able to answer it based only on a review of existing publications.

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research topic. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can use boolean operators to help narrow down your search:

Read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

To identify the most important publications on your topic, take note of recurring citations. If the same authors, books or articles keep appearing in your reading, make sure to seek them out.

You probably won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on the topic – you’ll have to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your questions.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models and methods? Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• How does the publication contribute to your understanding of the topic? What are its key insights and arguments?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible, and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can find out how many times an article has been cited on Google Scholar – a high citation count means the article has been influential in the field, and should certainly be included in your literature review.

The scope of your review will depend on your topic and discipline: in the sciences you usually only review recent literature, but in the humanities you might take a long historical perspective (for example, to trace how a concept has changed in meaning over time).

Remember that you can use our template to summarise and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using!

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It’s important to keep track of your sources with references to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography, where you compile full reference information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

You can use our free APA Reference Generator for quick, correct, consistent citations.

The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English editors. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students.

Correct my document today

To begin organising your literature review’s argument and structure, you need to understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly-visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat – this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organising the body of a literature review. You should have a rough idea of your strategy before you start writing.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarising sources in order.

Try to analyse patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organise your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text, your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

If you are writing the literature review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your central problem or research question and give a brief summary of the scholarly context. You can emphasise the timeliness of the topic (“many recent studies have focused on the problem of x”) or highlight a gap in the literature (“while there has been much research on x, few researchers have taken y into consideration”).

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, make sure to follow these tips:

• Summarise and synthesise: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole.
• Analyse and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole.
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources.
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts.

In the conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasise their significance.

If the literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to build a framework for your research. This can lead directly into your methodology section.

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a dissertation , thesis, research paper , or proposal .

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarise yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your  dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2022, June 07). What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 7 June 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/thesis-dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a dissertation proposal | a step-by-step guide, what is a theoretical framework | a step-by-step guide, what is a research methodology | steps & tips.

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• 5. The Literature Review
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

A literature review surveys prior research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a particular topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship about the topic.

Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014.

Importance of a Good Literature Review

A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories . A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. The analytical features of a literature review might:

• Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations,
• Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates,
• Depending on the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or
• Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been researched to date.

Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to:

• Place each work in the context of its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied.
• Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration.
• Identify new ways to interpret prior research.
• Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature.
• Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies.
• Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort.
• Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research.
• Locate your own research within the context of existing literature [very important].

Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2011; Knopf, Jeffrey W. "Doing a Literature Review." PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (January 2006): 127-132; Ridley, Diana. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students . 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012.

Types of Literature Reviews

It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the primary studies. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally among scholars that become part of the body of epistemological traditions within the field.

In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews. Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study.

Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply embedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden nature of some social science research [e.g., educational reform; immigration control], argumentative approaches to analyzing the literature can be a legitimate and important form of discourse. However, note that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to make summary claims of the sort found in systematic reviews [see below].

Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. This is the most common form of review in the social sciences.

Historical Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.

Methodological Review A review does not always focus on what someone said [findings], but how they came about saying what they say [method of analysis]. Reviewing methods of analysis provides a framework of understanding at different levels [i.e. those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches, and data collection and analysis techniques], how researchers draw upon a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection, and data analysis. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own study.

Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the research about a clearly defined research problem . Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B?" This type of literature review is primarily applied to examining prior research studies in clinical medicine and allied health fields, but it is increasingly being used in the social sciences.

Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.

NOTE: Most often the literature review will incorporate some combination of types. For example, a review that examines literature supporting or refuting an argument, assumption, or philosophical problem related to the research problem will also need to include writing supported by sources that establish the history of these arguments in the literature.

Baumeister, Roy F. and Mark R. Leary. "Writing Narrative Literature Reviews."  Review of General Psychology 1 (September 1997): 311-320; Mark R. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Kennedy, Mary M. "Defining a Literature." Educational Researcher 36 (April 2007): 139-147; Petticrew, Mark and Helen Roberts. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide . Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2006; Torracro, Richard. "Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples." Human Resource Development Review 4 (September 2005): 356-367; Rocco, Tonette S. and Maria S. Plakhotnik. "Literature Reviews, Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical Frameworks: Terms, Functions, and Distinctions." Human Ressource Development Review 8 (March 2008): 120-130; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  Thinking About Your Literature Review

The structure of a literature review should include the following in support of understanding the research problem :

• An overview of the subject, issue, or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review,
• Division of works under review into themes or categories [e.g. works that support a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative approaches entirely],
• An explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others,
• Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their argument, are most convincing of their opinions, and make the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research.

The critical evaluation of each work should consider :

• Provenance -- what are the author's credentials? Are the author's arguments supported by evidence [e.g. primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings]?
• Methodology -- were the techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research problem? Was the sample size appropriate? Were the results effectively interpreted and reported?
• Objectivity -- is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point?
• Persuasiveness -- which of the author's theses are most convincing or least convincing?
• Validity -- are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject?

II.  Development of the Literature Review

Four Basic Stages of Writing 1.  Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? 2.  Literature search -- finding materials relevant to the subject being explored. 3.  Data evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. 4.  Analysis and interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature.

Consider the following issues before writing the literature review: Clarify If your assignment is not specific about what form your literature review should take, seek clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1.  Roughly how many sources would be appropriate to include? 2.  What types of sources should I review (books, journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3.  Should I summarize, synthesize, or critique sources by discussing a common theme or issue? 4.  Should I evaluate the sources in any way beyond evaluating how they relate to understanding the research problem? 5.  Should I provide subheadings and other background information, such as definitions and/or a history? Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature review sections. Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize your final review. The bibliography or reference section of sources you've already read, such as required readings in the course syllabus, are also excellent entry points into your own research. Narrow the Topic The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to obtain a good survey of relevant resources. Your professor will probably not expect you to read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you first limit scope of the research problem. A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. You can also review the indexes of books to find references to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. For example, a book surveying the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include a chapter on the role Egypt has played in mediating the conflict, or look in the index for the pages where Egypt is mentioned in the text. Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible. This is particularly true in disciplines in medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are made. However, when writing a review in the social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be required. In other words, a complete understanding the research problem requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time. Sort through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. You can also use this method to explore what is considered by scholars to be a "hot topic" and what is not.

III.  Ways to Organize Your Literature Review

Chronology of Events If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials according to when they were published. This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development. For example, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of German economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. By Publication Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend. For instance, you could order a review of literature on environmental studies of brown fields if the progression revealed, for example, a change in the soil collection practices of the researchers who wrote and/or conducted the studies. Thematic [“conceptual categories”] A thematic literature review is the most common approach to summarizing prior research in the social and behavioral sciences. Thematic reviews are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time, although the progression of time may still be incorporated into a thematic review. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could focus on the development of online political satire. While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics, it would still be organized chronologically reflecting technological developments in media. The difference in this example between a "chronological" and a "thematic" approach is what is emphasized the most: themes related to the role of the Internet in presidential politics. Note that more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order. A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point being made. Methodological A methodological approach focuses on the methods utilized by the researcher. For the Internet in American presidential politics project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of American presidents on American, British, and French websites. Or the review might focus on the fundraising impact of the Internet on a particular political party. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed.

Other Sections of Your Literature Review Once you've decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational strategy. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. However, sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. However, only include what is necessary for the reader to locate your study within the larger scholarship about the research problem.

Here are examples of other sections, usually in the form of a single paragraph, you may need to include depending on the type of review you write:

• Current Situation : Information necessary to understand the current topic or focus of the literature review.
• Sources Used : Describes the methods and resources [e.g., databases] you used to identify the literature you reviewed.
• History : The chronological progression of the field, the research literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.
• Selection Methods : Criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your literature review. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed [i.e., scholarly] sources.
• Standards : Description of the way in which you present your information.
• Questions for Further Research : What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?

IV.  Writing Your Literature Review

Once you've settled on how to organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. When writing your review, keep in mind these issues.

Use Evidence A literature review section is, in this sense, just like any other academic research paper. Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with evidence [citations] that demonstrates that what you are saying is valid. Be Selective Select only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. The type of information you choose to mention should relate directly to the research problem, whether it is thematic, methodological, or chronological. Related items that provide additional information, but that are not key to understanding the research problem, can be included in a list of further readings . Use Quotes Sparingly Some short quotes are appropriate if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an author stated cannot be easily paraphrased. Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author, is not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. Do not use extensive quotes as a substitute for using your own words in reviewing the literature. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study's significance and relating it to your own work and the work of others. Keep Your Own Voice While the literature review presents others' ideas, your voice [the writer's] should remain front and center. For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. Use Caution When Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Even when paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work.

V.  Common Mistakes to Avoid

These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature.

• Sources in your literature review do not clearly relate to the research problem;
• You do not take sufficient time to define and identify the most relevant sources to use in the literature review related to the research problem;
• Relies exclusively on secondary analytical sources rather than including relevant primary research studies or data;
• Uncritically accepts another researcher's findings and interpretations as valid, rather than examining critically all aspects of the research design and analysis;
• Does not describe the search procedures that were used in identifying the literature to review;
• Reports isolated statistical results rather than synthesizing them in chi-squared or meta-analytic methods; and,
• Only includes research that validates assumptions and does not consider contrary findings and alternative interpretations found in the literature.

Cook, Kathleen E. and Elise Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course to Another?” Psychology Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques . London: SAGE, 2011; Literature Review Handout. Online Writing Center. Liberty University; Literature Reviews. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Rebecca Frels. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2016; Ridley, Diana. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students . 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012; Randolph, Justus J. “A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review." Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. vol. 14, June 2009; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016; Taylor, Dena. The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Writing a Literature Review. Academic Skills Centre. University of Canberra.

Writing Tip

Break Out of Your Disciplinary Box!

Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. For example, what might cultural anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle East? In what ways might geographers view the need for better distribution of social service agencies in large cities than how social workers might study the issue? You don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research literature in your discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study. However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective. Consult with a librarian about identifying research databases in other disciplines; almost every field of study has at least one comprehensive database devoted to indexing its research literature.

Frodeman, Robert. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity . New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Another Writing Tip

Don't Just Review for Content!

While conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you devote to writing this part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for and evaluating. Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it. Some questions to ask:

• How are they organizing their ideas?
• What methods have they used to study the problem?
• What theories have been used to explain, predict, or understand their research problem?
• What sources have they cited to support their conclusions?
• How have they used non-textual elements [e.g., charts, graphs, figures, etc.] to illustrate key points?

When you begin to write your literature review section, you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the research was designed and constructed because it establishes a means for developing more substantial analysis and interpretation of the research problem.

Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1 998.

Yet Another Writing Tip

When Do I Know I Can Stop Looking and Move On?

Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the literature:

• Look for repeating patterns in the research findings . If the same thing is being said, just by different people, then this likely demonstrates that the research problem has hit a conceptual dead end. At this point consider: Does your study extend current research?  Does it forge a new path? Or, does is merely add more of the same thing being said?
• Look at sources the authors cite to in their work . If you begin to see the same researchers cited again and again, then this is often an indication that no new ideas have been generated to address the research problem.
• Search Google Scholar to identify who has subsequently cited leading scholars already identified in your literature review [see next sub-tab]. This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. Here again, if the same authors are being cited again and again, this may indicate no new literature has been written on the topic.

Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Rebecca Frels. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach . Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2016; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.

• << Previous: Theoretical Framework
• Next: Citation Tracking >>
• Last Updated: May 30, 2024 9:38 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

• UConn Library
• Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide
• Introduction

Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide — Introduction

• Getting Started
• How to Pick a Topic
• Strategies to Find Sources
• Evaluating Sources & Lit. Reviews
• Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
• Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
• Citation Resources
• Other Academic Writings

What are Literature Reviews?

So, what is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries." Taylor, D.  The literature review: A few tips on conducting it . University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre.

Goals of Literature Reviews

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?  A literature could be written to accomplish different aims:

• To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
• To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
• Identify a problem in a field of research 

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews .  Review of General Psychology , 1 (3), 311-320.

What kinds of sources require a Literature Review?

• A research paper assigned in a course
• A thesis or dissertation
• A grant proposal
• An article intended for publication in a journal

All these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic.

Types of Literature Reviews

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.

• Example : Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework:  10.1177/08948453211037398  

Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L. K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . Plural Publishing.

• Example : The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review:  10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w

Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M. C., & Ilardi, S. S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Blackwell Publishing.

• Example : Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis:  10.1215/00703370-9164737

Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts .  Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 (3), 311-318.

• Example : Women’s perspectives on career successes and barriers: A qualitative meta-synthesis:  10.1177/05390184221113735

Literature Reviews in the Health Sciences

• UConn Health subject guide on systematic reviews Explanation of the different review types used in health sciences literature as well as tools to help you find the right review type
• << Previous: Getting Started
• Next: How to Pick a Topic >>
• Last Updated: Sep 21, 2022 2:16 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/literaturereview

How to Write a Literature Review: Six Steps to Get You from Start to Finish

Writing-a-literature-review-six-steps-to-get-you-from-start-to-finish.

Tanya Golash-Boza, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of California

February 03, 2022

Writing a literature review is often the most daunting part of writing an article, book, thesis, or dissertation. “The literature” seems (and often is) massive. I have found it helpful to be as systematic as possible when completing this gargantuan task.

Sonja Foss and William Walters* describe an efficient and effective way of writing a literature review. Their system provides an excellent guide for getting through the massive amounts of literature for any purpose: in a dissertation, an M.A. thesis, or preparing a research article for publication  in any field of study. Below is a  summary of the steps they outline as well as a step-by-step method for writing a literature review.

How to Write a Literature Review

Step One: Decide on your areas of research:

Before you begin to search for articles or books, decide beforehand what areas you are going to research. Make sure that you only get articles and books in those areas, even if you come across fascinating books in other areas. A literature review I am currently working on, for example, explores barriers to higher education for undocumented students.

Step Two: Search for the literature:

Conduct a comprehensive bibliographic search of books and articles in your area. Read the abstracts online and download and/or print those articles that pertain to your area of research. Find books in the library that are relevant and check them out. Set a specific time frame for how long you will search. It should not take more than two or three dedicated sessions.

Step Three: Find relevant excerpts in your books and articles:

Skim the contents of each book and article and look specifically for these five things:

1. Claims, conclusions, and findings about the constructs you are investigating

2. Definitions of terms

3. Calls for follow-up studies relevant to your project

4. Gaps you notice in the literature

5. Disagreement about the constructs you are investigating

When you find any of these five things, type the relevant excerpt directly into a Word document. Don’t summarize, as summarizing takes longer than simply typing the excerpt. Make sure to note the name of the author and the page number following each excerpt. Do this for each article and book that you have in your stack of literature. When you are done, print out your excerpts.

Step Four: Code the literature:

Get out a pair of scissors and cut each excerpt out. Now, sort the pieces of paper into similar topics. Figure out what the main themes are. Place each excerpt into a themed pile. Make sure each note goes into a pile. If there are excerpts that you can’t figure out where they belong, separate those and go over them again at the end to see if you need new categories. When you finish, place each stack of notes into an envelope labeled with the name of the theme.

Step Five: Create Your Conceptual Schema:

Type, in large font, the name of each of your coded themes. Print this out, and cut the titles into individual slips of paper. Take the slips of paper to a table or large workspace and figure out the best way to organize them. Are there ideas that go together or that are in dialogue with each other? Are there ideas that contradict each other? Move around the slips of paper until you come up with a way of organizing the codes that makes sense. Write the conceptual schema down before you forget or someone cleans up your slips of paper.

Step Six: Begin to Write Your Literature Review:

Choose any section of your conceptual schema to begin with. You can begin anywhere, because you already know the order. Find the envelope with the excerpts in them and lay them on the table in front of you. Figure out a mini-conceptual schema based on that theme by grouping together those excerpts that say the same thing. Use that mini-conceptual schema to write up your literature review based on the excerpts that you have in front of you. Don’t forget to include the citations as you write, so as not to lose track of who said what. Repeat this for each section of your literature review.

Once you complete these six steps, you will have a complete draft of your literature review. The great thing about this process is that it breaks down into manageable steps something that seems enormous: writing a literature review.

I think that Foss and Walter’s system for writing the literature review is ideal for a dissertation, because a Ph.D. candidate has already read widely in his or her field through graduate seminars and comprehensive exams.

It may be more challenging for M.A. students, unless you are already familiar with the literature. It is always hard to figure out how much you need to read for deep meaning, and how much you just need to know what others have said. That balance will depend on how much you already know.

For people writing literature reviews for articles or books, this system also could work, especially when you are writing in a field with which you are already familiar. The mere fact of having a system can make the literature review seem much less daunting, so I recommend this system for anyone who feels overwhelmed by the prospect of writing a literature review.

*Destination Dissertation: A Traveler's Guide to a Done Dissertation

Image Credit/Source: Goldmund Lukic/Getty Images

Watch our Webinar to help you get published

Please enter your Email Address

Please enter valid email address

Please Enter your First Name

Please enter your Last Name

Please enter your Questions or Comments.

Please enter the Privacy

Please enter the Terms & Conditions

How research content supports academic integrity

Finding time to publish as a medical student: 6 tips for Success

Software to Improve Reliability of Research Image Data: Wiley, Lumina, and Researchers at Harvard Medical School Work Together on Solutions

Driving Research Outcomes: Wiley Partners with CiteAb

ISBN, ISSN, DOI: what they are and how to find them

Image Collections for Medical Practitioners with TDS Health

How do you Discover Content?

Writing for Publication for Nurses (Mandarin Edition)

Get Published - Your How to Webinar

Finding time to publish as a medical student: 6 tips for success

Related articles.

Learn how Wiley partners with plagiarism detection services to support academic integrity around the world

Medical student Nicole Foley shares her top tips for writing and getting your work published.

Wiley and Lumina are working together to support the efforts of researchers at Harvard Medical School to develop and test new machine learning tools and artificial intelligence (AI) software that can

Learn more about our relationship with a company that helps scientists identify the right products to use in their research

What is ISBN? ISSN? DOI? Learn about some of the unique identifiers for book and journal content.

Learn how medical practitioners can easily access and search visual assets from our article portfolio

Explore free-to-use services that can help you discover new content

Watch this webinar to help you learn how to get published.

How to Easily Access the Most Relevant Research: A Q&A With the Creator of Scitrus

Atypon launches Scitrus, a personalized web app that allows users to create a customized feed of the latest research.

Effectively and Efficiently Creating your Paper

FOR INDIVIDUALS

FOR INSTITUTIONS & BUSINESSES

WILEY NETWORK

ABOUT WILEY

Corporate Responsibility

Corporate Governance

Leadership Team

Cookie Preferences

Copyright @ 2000-2024  by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., or related companies. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.

Rights & Permissions

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Get science-backed answers as you write with Paperpal's Research feature

What is a Literature Review? How to Write It (with Examples)

A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge, identifies gaps, and highlights key findings in the literature. 1 The purpose of a literature review is to situate your own research within the context of existing scholarship, demonstrating your understanding of the topic and showing how your work contributes to the ongoing conversation in the field. Learning how to write a literature review is a critical tool for successful research. Your ability to summarize and synthesize prior research pertaining to a certain topic demonstrates your grasp on the topic of study, and assists in the learning process. 

Table of Contents

• What is the purpose of literature review? 
• a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction: 
• b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes: 
• c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs: 
• d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts: 

How to write a good literature review 

• Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question: 
• Decide on the Scope of Your Review: 
• Select Databases for Searches: 
• Conduct Searches and Keep Track: 
• Review the Literature: 
• Organize and Write Your Literature Review: 
• How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal? 
• Frequently asked questions 

What is a literature review?

A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the existing literature, establishes the context for their own research, and contributes to scholarly conversations on the topic. One of the purposes of a literature review is also to help researchers avoid duplicating previous work and ensure that their research is informed by and builds upon the existing body of knowledge.

What is the purpose of literature review?

A literature review serves several important purposes within academic and research contexts. Here are some key objectives and functions of a literature review: 2  

1. Contextualizing the Research Problem: The literature review provides a background and context for the research problem under investigation. It helps to situate the study within the existing body of knowledge. 

2. Identifying Gaps in Knowledge: By identifying gaps, contradictions, or areas requiring further research, the researcher can shape the research question and justify the significance of the study. This is crucial for ensuring that the new research contributes something novel to the field. 

Find academic papers related to your research topic faster. Try Research on Paperpal  

3. Understanding Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks: Literature reviews help researchers gain an understanding of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks used in previous studies. This aids in the development of a theoretical framework for the current research. 

4. Providing Methodological Insights: Another purpose of literature reviews is that it allows researchers to learn about the methodologies employed in previous studies. This can help in choosing appropriate research methods for the current study and avoiding pitfalls that others may have encountered. 

5. Establishing Credibility: A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with existing scholarship, establishing their credibility and expertise in the field. It also helps in building a solid foundation for the new research. 

6. Informing Hypotheses or Research Questions: The literature review guides the formulation of hypotheses or research questions by highlighting relevant findings and areas of uncertainty in existing literature. 

Literature review example

Let’s delve deeper with a literature review example: Let’s say your literature review is about the impact of climate change on biodiversity. You might format your literature review into sections such as the effects of climate change on habitat loss and species extinction, phenological changes, and marine biodiversity. Each section would then summarize and analyze relevant studies in those areas, highlighting key findings and identifying gaps in the research. The review would conclude by emphasizing the need for further research on specific aspects of the relationship between climate change and biodiversity. The following literature review template provides a glimpse into the recommended literature review structure and content, demonstrating how research findings are organized around specific themes within a broader topic. 

Literature Review on Climate Change Impacts on Biodiversity:

Climate change is a global phenomenon with far-reaching consequences, including significant impacts on biodiversity. This literature review synthesizes key findings from various studies: 

a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction:

Climate change-induced alterations in temperature and precipitation patterns contribute to habitat loss, affecting numerous species (Thomas et al., 2004). The review discusses how these changes increase the risk of extinction, particularly for species with specific habitat requirements. 

b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes:

Observations of range shifts and changes in the timing of biological events (phenology) are documented in response to changing climatic conditions (Parmesan & Yohe, 2003). These shifts affect ecosystems and may lead to mismatches between species and their resources. 

c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs:

The review explores the impact of climate change on marine biodiversity, emphasizing ocean acidification’s threat to coral reefs (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007). Changes in pH levels negatively affect coral calcification, disrupting the delicate balance of marine ecosystems. 

d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts:

Recognizing the urgency of the situation, the literature review discusses various adaptive strategies adopted by species and conservation efforts aimed at mitigating the impacts of climate change on biodiversity (Hannah et al., 2007). It emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches for effective conservation planning. 

Strengthen your literature review with factual insights. Try Research on Paperpal for free!    

Writing a literature review involves summarizing and synthesizing existing research on a particular topic. A good literature review format should include the following elements. 

Introduction: The introduction sets the stage for your literature review, providing context and introducing the main focus of your review. 

• Opening Statement: Begin with a general statement about the broader topic and its significance in the field. 
• Scope and Purpose: Clearly define the scope of your literature review. Explain the specific research question or objective you aim to address. 
• Organizational Framework: Briefly outline the structure of your literature review, indicating how you will categorize and discuss the existing research. 
• Significance of the Study: Highlight why your literature review is important and how it contributes to the understanding of the chosen topic. 
• Thesis Statement: Conclude the introduction with a concise thesis statement that outlines the main argument or perspective you will develop in the body of the literature review. 

Body: The body of the literature review is where you provide a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, grouping studies based on themes, methodologies, or other relevant criteria. 

• Organize by Theme or Concept: Group studies that share common themes, concepts, or methodologies. Discuss each theme or concept in detail, summarizing key findings and identifying gaps or areas of disagreement. 
• Critical Analysis: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study. Discuss the methodologies used, the quality of evidence, and the overall contribution of each work to the understanding of the topic. 
• Synthesis of Findings: Synthesize the information from different studies to highlight trends, patterns, or areas of consensus in the literature. 
• Identification of Gaps: Discuss any gaps or limitations in the existing research and explain how your review contributes to filling these gaps. 
• Transition between Sections: Provide smooth transitions between different themes or concepts to maintain the flow of your literature review. 

Write and Cite as you go with Paperpal Research. Start now for free.   

Conclusion: The conclusion of your literature review should summarize the main findings, highlight the contributions of the review, and suggest avenues for future research. 

• Summary of Key Findings: Recap the main findings from the literature and restate how they contribute to your research question or objective. 
• Contributions to the Field: Discuss the overall contribution of your literature review to the existing knowledge in the field. 
• Implications and Applications: Explore the practical implications of the findings and suggest how they might impact future research or practice. 
• Recommendations for Future Research: Identify areas that require further investigation and propose potential directions for future research in the field. 
• Final Thoughts: Conclude with a final reflection on the importance of your literature review and its relevance to the broader academic community. 

Conducting a literature review

Conducting a literature review is an essential step in research that involves reviewing and analyzing existing literature on a specific topic. It’s important to know how to do a literature review effectively, so here are the steps to follow: 1  

Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question:

• Select a topic that is relevant to your field of study. 
• Clearly define your research question or objective. Determine what specific aspect of the topic do you want to explore? 

Decide on the Scope of Your Review:

• Determine the timeframe for your literature review. Are you focusing on recent developments, or do you want a historical overview? 
• Consider the geographical scope. Is your review global, or are you focusing on a specific region? 
• Define the inclusion and exclusion criteria. What types of sources will you include? Are there specific types of studies or publications you will exclude? 

Select Databases for Searches:

• Identify relevant databases for your field. Examples include PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. 
• Consider searching in library catalogs, institutional repositories, and specialized databases related to your topic. 

Conduct Searches and Keep Track:

• Develop a systematic search strategy using keywords, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), and other search techniques. 
• Record and document your search strategy for transparency and replicability. 
• Keep track of the articles, including publication details, abstracts, and links. Use citation management tools like EndNote, Zotero, or Mendeley to organize your references. 

Review the Literature:

• Evaluate the relevance and quality of each source. Consider the methodology, sample size, and results of studies. 
• Organize the literature by themes or key concepts. Identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the existing research. 
• Summarize key findings and arguments from each source. Compare and contrast different perspectives. 
• Identify areas where there is a consensus in the literature and where there are conflicting opinions. 
• Provide critical analysis and synthesis of the literature. What are the strengths and weaknesses of existing research? 

Organize and Write Your Literature Review:

• Literature review outline should be based on themes, chronological order, or methodological approaches. 
• Write a clear and coherent narrative that synthesizes the information gathered. 
• Use proper citations for each source and ensure consistency in your citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.). 
• Conclude your literature review by summarizing key findings, identifying gaps, and suggesting areas for future research. 

Whether you’re exploring a new research field or finding new angles to develop an existing topic, sifting through hundreds of papers can take more time than you have to spare. But what if you could find science-backed insights with verified citations in seconds? That’s the power of Paperpal’s new Research feature!  

How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal?

Paperpal, an AI writing assistant, integrates powerful academic search capabilities within its writing platform. With the Research feature, you get 100% factual insights, with citations backed by 250M+ verified research articles, directly within your writing interface with the option to save relevant references in your Citation Library. By eliminating the need to switch tabs to find answers to all your research questions, Paperpal saves time and helps you stay focused on your writing.   

Here’s how to use the Research feature:  

• Ask a question: Get started with a new document on paperpal.com. Click on the “Research” feature and type your question in plain English. Paperpal will scour over 250 million research articles, including conference papers and preprints, to provide you with accurate insights and citations. 
• Review and Save: Paperpal summarizes the information, while citing sources and listing relevant reads. You can quickly scan the results to identify relevant references and save these directly to your built-in citations library for later access. 
• Cite with Confidence: Paperpal makes it easy to incorporate relevant citations and references into your writing, ensuring your arguments are well-supported by credible sources. This translates to a polished, well-researched literature review. 

The literature review sample and detailed advice on writing and conducting a review will help you produce a well-structured report. But remember that a good literature review is an ongoing process, and it may be necessary to revisit and update it as your research progresses. By combining effortless research with an easy citation process, Paperpal Research streamlines the literature review process and empowers you to write faster and with more confidence. Try Paperpal Research now and see for yourself.  

Frequently asked questions

A literature review is a critical and comprehensive analysis of existing literature (published and unpublished works) on a specific topic or research question and provides a synthesis of the current state of knowledge in a particular field. A well-conducted literature review is crucial for researchers to build upon existing knowledge, avoid duplication of efforts, and contribute to the advancement of their field. It also helps researchers situate their work within a broader context and facilitates the development of a sound theoretical and conceptual framework for their studies.

Literature review is a crucial component of research writing, providing a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. The aim is to keep professionals up to date by providing an understanding of ongoing developments within a specific field, including research methods, and experimental techniques used in that field, and present that knowledge in the form of a written report. Also, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the scholar in his or her field.  

Before writing a literature review, it’s essential to undertake several preparatory steps to ensure that your review is well-researched, organized, and focused. This includes choosing a topic of general interest to you and doing exploratory research on that topic, writing an annotated bibliography, and noting major points, especially those that relate to the position you have taken on the topic. 

Literature reviews and academic research papers are essential components of scholarly work but serve different purposes within the academic realm. 3 A literature review aims to provide a foundation for understanding the current state of research on a particular topic, identify gaps or controversies, and lay the groundwork for future research. Therefore, it draws heavily from existing academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other scholarly publications. In contrast, an academic research paper aims to present new knowledge, contribute to the academic discourse, and advance the understanding of a specific research question. Therefore, it involves a mix of existing literature (in the introduction and literature review sections) and original data or findings obtained through research methods. 

Literature reviews are essential components of academic and research papers, and various strategies can be employed to conduct them effectively. If you want to know how to write a literature review for a research paper, here are four common approaches that are often used by researchers.  Chronological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the chronological order of publication. It helps to trace the development of a topic over time, showing how ideas, theories, and research have evolved.  Thematic Review: Thematic reviews focus on identifying and analyzing themes or topics that cut across different studies. Instead of organizing the literature chronologically, it is grouped by key themes or concepts, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of various aspects of the topic.  Methodological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the research methods employed in different studies. It helps to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of various methodologies and allows the reader to evaluate the reliability and validity of the research findings.  Theoretical Review: A theoretical review examines the literature based on the theoretical frameworks used in different studies. This approach helps to identify the key theories that have been applied to the topic and assess their contributions to the understanding of the subject.  It’s important to note that these strategies are not mutually exclusive, and a literature review may combine elements of more than one approach. The choice of strategy depends on the research question, the nature of the literature available, and the goals of the review. Additionally, other strategies, such as integrative reviews or systematic reviews, may be employed depending on the specific requirements of the research.

The literature review format can vary depending on the specific publication guidelines. However, there are some common elements and structures that are often followed. Here is a general guideline for the format of a literature review:  Introduction:   Provide an overview of the topic.  Define the scope and purpose of the literature review.  State the research question or objective.  Body:   Organize the literature by themes, concepts, or chronology.  Critically analyze and evaluate each source.  Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the studies.  Highlight any methodological limitations or biases.  Identify patterns, connections, or contradictions in the existing research.  Conclusion:   Summarize the key points discussed in the literature review.  Highlight the research gap.  Address the research question or objective stated in the introduction.  Highlight the contributions of the review and suggest directions for future research.

Both annotated bibliographies and literature reviews involve the examination of scholarly sources. While annotated bibliographies focus on individual sources with brief annotations, literature reviews provide a more in-depth, integrated, and comprehensive analysis of existing literature on a specific topic. The key differences are as follows: 

References 

• Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to write a literature review.  Journal of criminal justice education ,  24 (2), 218-234. 
• Pan, M. L. (2016).  Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches . Taylor & Francis. 
• Cantero, C. (2019). How to write a literature review.  San José State University Writing Center . 

Paperpal is an AI writing assistant that help academics write better, faster with real-time suggestions for in-depth language and grammar correction. Trained on millions of research manuscripts enhanced by professional academic editors, Paperpal delivers human precision at machine speed.  

Try it for free or upgrade to  Paperpal Prime , which unlocks unlimited access to premium features like academic translation, paraphrasing, contextual synonyms, consistency checks and more. It’s like always having a professional academic editor by your side! Go beyond limitations and experience the future of academic writing.  Get Paperpal Prime now at just US$19 a month!

Related Reads:

• Empirical Research: A Comprehensive Guide for Academics 
• How to Write a Scientific Paper in 10 Steps 
• How Long Should a Chapter Be?
• How to Use Paperpal to Generate Emails & Cover Letters?

6 Tips for Post-Doc Researchers to Take Their Career to the Next Level

Self-plagiarism in research: what it is and how to avoid it, you may also like, how paperpal can boost comprehension and foster interdisciplinary..., what is the importance of a concept paper..., how to write the first draft of a..., mla works cited page: format, template & examples, how to ace grant writing for research funding..., powerful academic phrases to improve your essay writing , how to write a high-quality conference paper, how paperpal’s research feature helps you develop and..., how paperpal is enhancing academic productivity and accelerating..., how to write a successful book chapter for....

How To Structure Your Literature Review

3 options to help structure your chapter.

By: Amy Rommelspacher (PhD) | Reviewer: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | November 2020 (Updated May 2023)

Writing the literature review chapter can seem pretty daunting when you’re piecing together your dissertation or thesis. As  we’ve discussed before , a good literature review needs to achieve a few very important objectives – it should:

• Demonstrate your knowledge of the research topic
• Identify the gaps in the literature and show how your research links to these
• Provide the foundation for your conceptual framework (if you have one)
• Inform your own  methodology and research design

To achieve this, your literature review needs a well-thought-out structure . Get the structure of your literature review chapter wrong and you’ll struggle to achieve these objectives. Don’t worry though – in this post, we’ll look at how to structure your literature review for maximum impact (and marks!).

But wait – is this the right time?

Deciding on the structure of your literature review should come towards the end of the literature review process – after you have collected and digested the literature, but before you start writing the chapter. 

In other words, you need to first develop a rich understanding of the literature before you even attempt to map out a structure. There’s no use trying to develop a structure before you’ve fully wrapped your head around the existing research.

Equally importantly, you need to have a structure in place before you start writing , or your literature review will most likely end up a rambling, disjointed mess. 

Importantly, don’t feel that once you’ve defined a structure you can’t iterate on it. It’s perfectly natural to adjust as you engage in the writing process. As we’ve discussed before , writing is a way of developing your thinking, so it’s quite common for your thinking to change – and therefore, for your chapter structure to change – as you write. 

Need a helping hand?

Like any other chapter in your thesis or dissertation, your literature review needs to have a clear, logical structure. At a minimum, it should have three essential components – an  introduction , a  body   and a  conclusion . 

Let’s take a closer look at each of these.

1: The Introduction Section

Just like any good introduction, the introduction section of your literature review should introduce the purpose and layout (organisation) of the chapter. In other words, your introduction needs to give the reader a taste of what’s to come, and how you’re going to lay that out. Essentially, you should provide the reader with a high-level roadmap of your chapter to give them a taste of the journey that lies ahead.

Here’s an example of the layout visualised in a literature review introduction:

Your introduction should also outline your topic (including any tricky terminology or jargon) and provide an explanation of the scope of your literature review – in other words, what you  will   and  won’t   be covering (the delimitations ). This helps ringfence your review and achieve a clear focus . The clearer and narrower your focus, the deeper you can dive into the topic (which is typically where the magic lies). 

Depending on the nature of your project, you could also present your stance or point of view at this stage. In other words, after grappling with the literature you’ll have an opinion about what the trends and concerns are in the field as well as what’s lacking. The introduction section can then present these ideas so that it is clear to examiners that you’re aware of how your research connects with existing knowledge .

2: The Body Section

The body of your literature review is the centre of your work. This is where you’ll present, analyse, evaluate and synthesise the existing research. In other words, this is where you’re going to earn (or lose) the most marks. Therefore, it’s important to carefully think about how you will organise your discussion to present it in a clear way. 

The body of your literature review should do just as the description of this chapter suggests. It should “review” the literature – in other words, identify, analyse, and synthesise it. So, when thinking about structuring your literature review, you need to think about which structural approach will provide the best “review” for your specific type of research and objectives (we’ll get to this shortly).

There are (broadly speaking)  three options  for organising your literature review.

Option 1: Chronological (according to date)

Organising the literature chronologically is one of the simplest ways to structure your literature review. You start with what was published first and work your way through the literature until you reach the work published most recently. Pretty straightforward.

The benefit of this option is that it makes it easy to discuss the developments and debates in the field as they emerged over time. Organising your literature chronologically also allows you to highlight how specific articles or pieces of work might have changed the course of the field – in other words, which research has had the most impact . Therefore, this approach is very useful when your research is aimed at understanding how the topic has unfolded over time and is often used by scholars in the field of history. That said, this approach can be utilised by anyone that wants to explore change over time .

For example , if a student of politics is investigating how the understanding of democracy has evolved over time, they could use the chronological approach to provide a narrative that demonstrates how this understanding has changed through the ages.

Here are some questions you can ask yourself to help you structure your literature review chronologically.

• What is the earliest literature published relating to this topic?
• How has the field changed over time? Why?
• What are the most recent discoveries/theories?

In some ways, chronology plays a part whichever way you decide to structure your literature review, because you will always, to a certain extent, be analysing how the literature has developed. However, with the chronological approach, the emphasis is very firmly on how the discussion has evolved over time , as opposed to how all the literature links together (which we’ll discuss next ).

Option 2: Thematic (grouped by theme)

The thematic approach to structuring a literature review means organising your literature by theme or category – for example, by independent variables (i.e. factors that have an impact on a specific outcome).

As you’ve been collecting and synthesising literature , you’ll likely have started seeing some themes or patterns emerging. You can then use these themes or patterns as a structure for your body discussion. The thematic approach is the most common approach and is useful for structuring literature reviews in most fields.

For example, if you were researching which factors contributed towards people trusting an organisation, you might find themes such as consumers’ perceptions of an organisation’s competence, benevolence and integrity. Structuring your literature review thematically would mean structuring your literature review’s body section to discuss each of these themes, one section at a time.

Here are some questions to ask yourself when structuring your literature review by themes:

• Are there any patterns that have come to light in the literature?
• What are the central themes and categories used by the researchers?
• Do I have enough evidence of these themes?

PS – you can see an example of a thematically structured literature review in our literature review sample walkthrough video here.

Option 3: Methodological

The methodological option is a way of structuring your literature review by the research methodologies used . In other words, organising your discussion based on the angle from which each piece of research was approached – for example, qualitative , quantitative or mixed  methodologies.

Structuring your literature review by methodology can be useful if you are drawing research from a variety of disciplines and are critiquing different methodologies. The point of this approach is to question  how  existing research has been conducted, as opposed to  what  the conclusions and/or findings the research were.

For example, a sociologist might centre their research around critiquing specific fieldwork practices. Their literature review will then be a summary of the fieldwork methodologies used by different studies.

Here are some questions you can ask yourself when structuring your literature review according to methodology:

• Which methodologies have been utilised in this field?
• Which methodology is the most popular (and why)?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the various methodologies?
• How can the existing methodologies inform my own methodology?

3: The Conclusion Section

Once you’ve completed the body section of your literature review using one of the structural approaches we discussed above, you’ll need to “wrap up” your literature review and pull all the pieces together to set the direction for the rest of your dissertation or thesis.

The conclusion is where you’ll present the key findings of your literature review. In this section, you should emphasise the research that is especially important to your research questions and highlight the gaps that exist in the literature. Based on this, you need to make it clear what you will add to the literature – in other words, justify your own research by showing how it will help fill one or more of the gaps you just identified.

Last but not least, if it’s your intention to develop a conceptual framework for your dissertation or thesis, the conclusion section is a good place to present this.

Example: Thematically Structured Review

In the video below, we unpack a literature review chapter so that you can see an example of a thematically structure review in practice.

Let’s Recap

In this article, we’ve  discussed how to structure your literature review for maximum impact. Here’s a quick recap of what  you need to keep in mind when deciding on your literature review structure:

• Just like other chapters, your literature review needs a clear introduction , body and conclusion .
• The introduction section should provide an overview of what you will discuss in your literature review.
• The body section of your literature review can be organised by chronology , theme or methodology . The right structural approach depends on what you’re trying to achieve with your research.
• The conclusion section should draw together the key findings of your literature review and link them to your research questions.

If you’re ready to get started, be sure to download our free literature review template to fast-track your chapter outline.

Psst… there’s more!

This post is an extract from our bestselling short course, Literature Review Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .

You Might Also Like:

27 Comments

Great work. This is exactly what I was looking for and helps a lot together with your previous post on literature review. One last thing is missing: a link to a great literature chapter of an journal article (maybe with comments of the different sections in this review chapter). Do you know any great literature review chapters?

I agree with you Marin… A great piece

I agree with Marin. This would be quite helpful if you annotate a nicely structured literature from previously published research articles.

Awesome article for my research.

I thank you immensely for this wonderful guide

It is indeed thought and supportive work for the futurist researcher and students

Very educative and good time to get guide. Thank you

Great work, very insightful. Thank you.

Thanks for this wonderful presentation. My question is that do I put all the variables into a single conceptual framework or each hypothesis will have it own conceptual framework?

Thank you very much, very helpful

This is very educative and precise . Thank you very much for dropping this kind of write up .

Pheeww, so damn helpful, thank you for this informative piece.

I’m doing a research project topic ; stool analysis for parasitic worm (enteric) worm, how do I structure it, thanks.

comprehensive explanation. Help us by pasting the URL of some good “literature review” for better understanding.

great piece. thanks for the awesome explanation. it is really worth sharing. I have a little question, if anyone can help me out, which of the options in the body of literature can be best fit if you are writing an architectural thesis that deals with design?

I am doing a research on nanofluids how can l structure it?

Beautifully clear.nThank you!

Lucid! Thankyou!

Brilliant work, well understood, many thanks

I like how this was so clear with simple language 😊😊 thank you so much 😊 for these information 😊

Insightful. I was struggling to come up with a sensible literature review but this has been really helpful. Thank you!

You have given thought-provoking information about the review of the literature.

Thank you. It has made my own research better and to impart your work to students I teach

I learnt a lot from this teaching. It’s a great piece.

I am doing research on EFL teacher motivation for his/her job. How Can I structure it? Is there any detailed template, additional to this?

You are so cool! I do not think I’ve read through something like this before. So nice to find somebody with some genuine thoughts on this issue. Seriously.. thank you for starting this up. This site is one thing that is required on the internet, someone with a little originality!

I’m asked to do conceptual, theoretical and empirical literature, and i just don’t know how to structure it

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

• University of Texas Libraries

Literature Reviews

• What is a literature review?
• Steps in the Literature Review Process
• Define your research question
• Determine inclusion and exclusion criteria
• Choose databases and search
• Review Results
• Synthesize Results
• Analyze Results
• Librarian Support

What is a Literature Review?

A literature or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or research question. The literature that is reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association papers, and dissertations. It contains the most pertinent studies and points to important past and current research and practices. It provides background and context, and shows how your research will contribute to the field. 

A literature review should: 

• Provide a comprehensive and updated review of the literature;
• Explain why this review has taken place;
• Articulate a position or hypothesis;
• Acknowledge and account for conflicting and corroborating points of view

From  S age Research Methods

Purpose of a Literature Review

A literature review can be written as an introduction to a study to:

• Demonstrate how a study fills a gap in research
• Compare a study with other research that's been done

Or it can be a separate work (a research article on its own) which:

• Organizes or describes a topic
• Describes variables within a particular issue/problem

Limitations of a Literature Review

Some of the limitations of a literature review are:

• It's a snapshot in time. Unlike other reviews, this one has beginning, a middle and an end. There may be future developments that could make your work less relevant.
• It may be too focused. Some niche studies may miss the bigger picture.
• It can be difficult to be comprehensive. There is no way to make sure all the literature on a topic was considered.
• It is easy to be biased if you stick to top tier journals. There may be other places where people are publishing exemplary research. Look to open access publications and conferences to reflect a more inclusive collection. Also, make sure to include opposing views (and not just supporting evidence).

Source: Grant, Maria J., and Andrew Booth. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information & Libraries Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, June 2009, pp. 91–108. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.

Meryl Brodsky : Communication and Information Studies

Hannah Chapman Tripp : Biology, Neuroscience

Carolyn Cunningham : Human Development & Family Sciences, Psychology, Sociology

Larayne Dallas : Engineering

Janelle Hedstrom : Special Education, Curriculum & Instruction, Ed Leadership & Policy ​

Susan Macicak : Linguistics

Imelda Vetter : Dell Medical School

For help in other subject areas, please see the guide to library specialists by subject .

Periodically, UT Libraries runs a workshop covering the basics and library support for literature reviews. While we try to offer these once per academic year, we find providing the recording to be helpful to community members who have missed the session. Following is the most recent recording of the workshop, Conducting a Literature Review. To view the recording, a UT login is required.

• October 26, 2022 recording
• Last Updated: Oct 26, 2022 2:49 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.utexas.edu/literaturereviews

• Schools & departments

Literature review

A general guide on how to conduct and write a literature review.

Please check course or programme information and materials provided by teaching staff, including your project supervisor, for subject-specific guidance.

What is a literature review?

A literature review is a piece of academic writing demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the academic literature on a specific topic placed in context.  A literature review also includes a critical evaluation of the material; this is why it is called a literature review rather than a literature report. It is a process of reviewing the literature, as well as a form of writing.

To illustrate the difference between reporting and reviewing, think about television or film review articles.  These articles include content such as a brief synopsis or the key points of the film or programme plus the critic’s own evaluation.  Similarly the two main objectives of a literature review are firstly the content covering existing research, theories and evidence, and secondly your own critical evaluation and discussion of this content. 

Usually a literature review forms a section or part of a dissertation, research project or long essay.  However, it can also be set and assessed as a standalone piece of work.

What is the purpose of a literature review?

…your task is to build an argument, not a library. Rudestam, K.E. and Newton, R.R. (1992) Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process. California: Sage, p49.

In a larger piece of written work, such as a dissertation or project, a literature review is usually one of the first tasks carried out after deciding on a topic.  Reading combined with critical analysis can help to refine a topic and frame research questions.  Conducting a literature review establishes your familiarity with and understanding of current research in a particular field before carrying out a new investigation. After doing a literature review, you should know what research has already been done and be able to identify what is unknown within your topic.

When doing and writing a literature review, it is good practice to:

• summarise and analyse previous research and theories;
• identify areas of controversy and contested claims;
• highlight any gaps that may exist in research to date.

Conducting a literature review

Focusing on different aspects of your literature review can be useful to help plan, develop, refine and write it.  You can use and adapt the prompt questions in our worksheet below at different points in the process of researching and writing your review.  These are suggestions to get you thinking and writing.

Developing and refining your literature review (pdf)

Developing and refining your literature review (Word)

Developing and refining your literature review (Word rtf)

Writing a literature review has a lot in common with other assignment tasks.  There is advice on our other pages about thinking critically, reading strategies and academic writing.  Our literature review top tips suggest some specific things you can do to help you submit a successful review.

Literature review top tips (pdf)

Literature review top tips (Word rtf)

Our reading page includes strategies and advice on using books and articles and a notes record sheet grid you can use.

Reading at university

The Academic writing page suggests ways to organise and structure information from a range of sources and how you can develop your argument as you read and write.

Academic writing

The Critical thinking page has advice on how to be a more critical researcher and a form you can use to help you think and break down the stages of developing your argument.

Critical thinking

As with other forms of academic writing, your literature review needs to demonstrate good academic practice by following the Code of Student Conduct and acknowledging the work of others through citing and referencing your sources.  

Good academic practice

As with any writing task, you will need to review, edit and rewrite sections of your literature review.  The Editing and proofreading page includes tips on how to do this and strategies for standing back and thinking about your structure and checking the flow of your argument.

Editing and proofreading

Guidance on literature searching from the University Library

The Academic Support Librarians have developed LibSmart I and II, Learn courses to help you develop and enhance your digital research skills and capabilities; from getting started with the Library to managing data for your dissertation.

Searching using the library’s DiscoverEd tool: DiscoverEd

Finding resources in your subject: Subject guides

The Academic Support Librarians also provide one-to-one appointments to help you develop your research strategies.

1 to 1 support for literature searching and systematic reviews

Advice to help you optimise use of Google Scholar, Google Books and Google for your research and study: Using Google

Managing and curating your references

A referencing management tool can help you to collect and organise and your source material to produce a bibliography or reference list. 

Referencing and reference management

Information Services provide access to Cite them right online which is a guide to the main referencing systems and tells you how to reference just about any source (EASE log-in may be required).

Cite them right

Published study guides

There are a number of scholarship skills books and guides available which can help with writing a literature review.  Our Resource List of study skills guides includes sections on Referencing, Dissertation and project writing and Literature reviews.

Study skills guides

This article was published on 2024-02-26

Literature Reviews

What this handout is about.

This handout will explain what literature reviews are and offer insights into the form and construction of literature reviews in the humanities, social sciences, and sciences.

Introduction

OK. You’ve got to write a literature review. You dust off a novel and a book of poetry, settle down in your chair, and get ready to issue a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” as you leaf through the pages. “Literature review” done. Right?

Wrong! The “literature” of a literature review refers to any collection of materials on a topic, not necessarily the great literary texts of the world. “Literature” could be anything from a set of government pamphlets on British colonial methods in Africa to scholarly articles on the treatment of a torn ACL. And a review does not necessarily mean that your reader wants you to give your personal opinion on whether or not you liked these sources.

What is a literature review, then?

A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period.

A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant.

But how is a literature review different from an academic research paper?

The main focus of an academic research paper is to develop a new argument, and a research paper is likely to contain a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, you use the literature as a foundation and as support for a new insight that you contribute. The focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions.

Why do we write literature reviews?

Literature reviews provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic. If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone. For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field. Literature reviews also provide a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers.

Who writes these things, anyway?

Literature reviews are written occasionally in the humanities, but mostly in the sciences and social sciences; in experiment and lab reports, they constitute a section of the paper. Sometimes a literature review is written as a paper in itself.

Let’s get to it! What should I do before writing the literature review?

If your assignment is not very specific, seek clarification from your instructor:

• Roughly how many sources should you include?
• What types of sources (books, journal articles, websites)?
• Should you summarize, synthesize, or critique your sources by discussing a common theme or issue?
• Should you evaluate your sources?
• Should you provide subheadings and other background information, such as definitions and/or a history?

Find models

Look for other literature reviews in your area of interest or in the discipline and read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or ways to organize your final review. You can simply put the word “review” in your search engine along with your other topic terms to find articles of this type on the Internet or in an electronic database. The bibliography or reference section of sources you’ve already read are also excellent entry points into your own research.

Narrow your topic

There are hundreds or even thousands of articles and books on most areas of study. The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to get a good survey of the material. Your instructor will probably not expect you to read everything that’s out there on the topic, but you’ll make your job easier if you first limit your scope.

Keep in mind that UNC Libraries have research guides and to databases relevant to many fields of study. You can reach out to the subject librarian for a consultation: https://library.unc.edu/support/consultations/ .

And don’t forget to tap into your professor’s (or other professors’) knowledge in the field. Ask your professor questions such as: “If you had to read only one book from the 90’s on topic X, what would it be?” Questions such as this help you to find and determine quickly the most seminal pieces in the field.

Consider whether your sources are current

Some disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible. In the sciences, for instance, treatments for medical problems are constantly changing according to the latest studies. Information even two years old could be obsolete. However, if you are writing a review in the humanities, history, or social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be what is needed, because what is important is how perspectives have changed through the years or within a certain time period. Try sorting through some other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. You can also use this method to consider what is currently of interest to scholars in this field and what is not.

Strategies for writing the literature review

Find a focus.

A literature review, like a term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the sources themselves as an annotated bibliography would be organized. This means that you will not just simply list your sources and go into detail about each one of them, one at a time. No. As you read widely but selectively in your topic area, consider instead what themes or issues connect your sources together. Do they present one or different solutions? Is there an aspect of the field that is missing? How well do they present the material and do they portray it according to an appropriate theory? Do they reveal a trend in the field? A raging debate? Pick one of these themes to focus the organization of your review.

Convey it to your reader

A literature review may not have a traditional thesis statement (one that makes an argument), but you do need to tell readers what to expect. Try writing a simple statement that lets the reader know what is your main organizing principle. Here are a couple of examples:

The current trend in treatment for congestive heart failure combines surgery and medicine. More and more cultural studies scholars are accepting popular media as a subject worthy of academic consideration.

Consider organization

You’ve got a focus, and you’ve stated it clearly and directly. Now what is the most effective way of presenting the information? What are the most important topics, subtopics, etc., that your review needs to include? And in what order should you present them? Develop an organization for your review at both a global and local level:

First, cover the basic categories

Just like most academic papers, literature reviews also must contain at least three basic elements: an introduction or background information section; the body of the review containing the discussion of sources; and, finally, a conclusion and/or recommendations section to end the paper. The following provides a brief description of the content of each:

• Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern.
• Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized either chronologically, thematically, or methodologically (see below for more information on each).
• Conclusions/Recommendations: Discuss what you have drawn from reviewing literature so far. Where might the discussion proceed?

Organizing the body

Once you have the basic categories in place, then you must consider how you will present the sources themselves within the body of your paper. Create an organizational method to focus this section even further.

To help you come up with an overall organizational framework for your review, consider the following scenario:

You’ve decided to focus your literature review on materials dealing with sperm whales. This is because you’ve just finished reading Moby Dick, and you wonder if that whale’s portrayal is really real. You start with some articles about the physiology of sperm whales in biology journals written in the 1980’s. But these articles refer to some British biological studies performed on whales in the early 18th century. So you check those out. Then you look up a book written in 1968 with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other forms of art, such as in Alaskan poetry, in French painting, or on whale bone, as the whale hunters in the late 19th century used to do. This makes you wonder about American whaling methods during the time portrayed in Moby Dick, so you find some academic articles published in the last five years on how accurately Herman Melville portrayed the whaling scene in his novel.

Now consider some typical ways of organizing the sources into a review:

• Chronological: If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials above according to when they were published. For instance, first you would talk about the British biological studies of the 18th century, then about Moby Dick, published in 1851, then the book on sperm whales in other art (1968), and finally the biology articles (1980s) and the recent articles on American whaling of the 19th century. But there is relatively no continuity among subjects here. And notice that even though the sources on sperm whales in other art and on American whaling are written recently, they are about other subjects/objects that were created much earlier. Thus, the review loses its chronological focus.
• By publication: Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend. For instance, you could order a review of literature on biological studies of sperm whales if the progression revealed a change in dissection practices of the researchers who wrote and/or conducted the studies.
• By trend: A better way to organize the above sources chronologically is to examine the sources under another trend, such as the history of whaling. Then your review would have subsections according to eras within this period. For instance, the review might examine whaling from pre-1600-1699, 1700-1799, and 1800-1899. Under this method, you would combine the recent studies on American whaling in the 19th century with Moby Dick itself in the 1800-1899 category, even though the authors wrote a century apart.
• Thematic: Thematic reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time. However, progression of time may still be an important factor in a thematic review. For instance, the sperm whale review could focus on the development of the harpoon for whale hunting. While the study focuses on one topic, harpoon technology, it will still be organized chronologically. The only difference here between a “chronological” and a “thematic” approach is what is emphasized the most: the development of the harpoon or the harpoon technology.But more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order. For instance, a thematic review of material on sperm whales might examine how they are portrayed as “evil” in cultural documents. The subsections might include how they are personified, how their proportions are exaggerated, and their behaviors misunderstood. A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point made.
• Methodological: A methodological approach differs from the two above in that the focusing factor usually does not have to do with the content of the material. Instead, it focuses on the “methods” of the researcher or writer. For the sperm whale project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in American, British, and French art work. Or the review might focus on the economic impact of whaling on a community. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed. Once you’ve decided on the organizational method for the body of the review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out. They should arise out of your organizational strategy. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period. A thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue.

Sometimes, though, you might need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Put in only what is necessary. Here are a few other sections you might want to consider:

• Current Situation: Information necessary to understand the topic or focus of the literature review.
• History: The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.
• Methods and/or Standards: The criteria you used to select the sources in your literature review or the way in which you present your information. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed articles and journals.

Questions for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?

Begin composing

Once you’ve settled on a general pattern of organization, you’re ready to write each section. There are a few guidelines you should follow during the writing stage as well. Here is a sample paragraph from a literature review about sexism and language to illuminate the following discussion:

However, other studies have shown that even gender-neutral antecedents are more likely to produce masculine images than feminine ones (Gastil, 1990). Hamilton (1988) asked students to complete sentences that required them to fill in pronouns that agreed with gender-neutral antecedents such as “writer,” “pedestrian,” and “persons.” The students were asked to describe any image they had when writing the sentence. Hamilton found that people imagined 3.3 men to each woman in the masculine “generic” condition and 1.5 men per woman in the unbiased condition. Thus, while ambient sexism accounted for some of the masculine bias, sexist language amplified the effect. (Source: Erika Falk and Jordan Mills, “Why Sexist Language Affects Persuasion: The Role of Homophily, Intended Audience, and Offense,” Women and Language19:2).

Use evidence

In the example above, the writers refer to several other sources when making their point. A literature review in this sense is just like any other academic research paper. Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with evidence to show that what you are saying is valid.

Be selective

Select only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. The type of information you choose to mention should relate directly to the review’s focus, whether it is thematic, methodological, or chronological.

Use quotes sparingly

Falk and Mills do not use any direct quotes. That is because the survey nature of the literature review does not allow for in-depth discussion or detailed quotes from the text. Some short quotes here and there are okay, though, if you want to emphasize a point, or if what the author said just cannot be rewritten in your own words. Notice that Falk and Mills do quote certain terms that were coined by the author, not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. But if you find yourself wanting to put in more quotes, check with your instructor.

Summarize and synthesize

Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each paragraph as well as throughout the review. The authors here recapitulate important features of Hamilton’s study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study’s significance and relating it to their own work.

Keep your own voice

While the literature review presents others’ ideas, your voice (the writer’s) should remain front and center. Notice that Falk and Mills weave references to other sources into their own text, but they still maintain their own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with their own ideas and their own words. The sources support what Falk and Mills are saying.

Use caution when paraphrasing

When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author’s information or opinions accurately and in your own words. In the preceding example, Falk and Mills either directly refer in the text to the author of their source, such as Hamilton, or they provide ample notation in the text when the ideas they are mentioning are not their own, for example, Gastil’s. For more information, please see our handout on plagiarism .

Revise, revise, revise

Draft in hand? Now you’re ready to revise. Spending a lot of time revising is a wise idea, because your main objective is to present the material, not the argument. So check over your review again to make sure it follows the assignment and/or your outline. Then, just as you would for most other academic forms of writing, rewrite or rework the language of your review so that you’ve presented your information in the most concise manner possible. Be sure to use terminology familiar to your audience; get rid of unnecessary jargon or slang. Finally, double check that you’ve documented your sources and formatted the review appropriately for your discipline. For tips on the revising and editing process, see our handout on revising drafts .

Works consulted

We consulted these works while writing this handout. This is not a comprehensive list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find additional publications. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match the citation style you are using. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial . We revise these tips periodically and welcome feedback.

Anson, Chris M., and Robert A. Schwegler. 2010. The Longman Handbook for Writers and Readers , 6th ed. New York: Longman.

Jones, Robert, Patrick Bizzaro, and Cynthia Selfe. 1997. The Harcourt Brace Guide to Writing in the Disciplines . New York: Harcourt Brace.

Lamb, Sandra E. 1998. How to Write It: A Complete Guide to Everything You’ll Ever Write . Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.

Rosen, Leonard J., and Laurence Behrens. 2003. The Allyn & Bacon Handbook , 5th ed. New York: Longman.

Troyka, Lynn Quittman, and Doug Hesse. 2016. Simon and Schuster Handbook for Writers , 11th ed. London: Pearson.

You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Make a Gift

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Functional connectivity changes in the brain of adolescents with internet addiction: A systematic literature review of imaging studies

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Department of Brain Sciences, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation Behavioural Brain Sciences Unit, Population Policy Practice Programme, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom

• Max L. Y. Chang, 
• Irene O. Lee

• Published: June 4, 2024
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022
• Peer Review
• Reader Comments

Internet usage has seen a stark global rise over the last few decades, particularly among adolescents and young people, who have also been diagnosed increasingly with internet addiction (IA). IA impacts several neural networks that influence an adolescent’s behaviour and development. This article issued a literature review on the resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies to inspect the consequences of IA on the functional connectivity (FC) in the adolescent brain and its subsequent effects on their behaviour and development. A systematic search was conducted from two databases, PubMed and PsycINFO, to select eligible articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligibility criteria was especially stringent regarding the adolescent age range (10–19) and formal diagnosis of IA. Bias and quality of individual studies were evaluated. The fMRI results from 12 articles demonstrated that the effects of IA were seen throughout multiple neural networks: a mix of increases/decreases in FC in the default mode network; an overall decrease in FC in the executive control network; and no clear increase or decrease in FC within the salience network and reward pathway. The FC changes led to addictive behaviour and tendencies in adolescents. The subsequent behavioural changes are associated with the mechanisms relating to the areas of cognitive control, reward valuation, motor coordination, and the developing adolescent brain. Our results presented the FC alterations in numerous brain regions of adolescents with IA leading to the behavioural and developmental changes. Research on this topic had a low frequency with adolescent samples and were primarily produced in Asian countries. Future research studies of comparing results from Western adolescent samples provide more insight on therapeutic intervention.

Citation: Chang MLY, Lee IO (2024) Functional connectivity changes in the brain of adolescents with internet addiction: A systematic literature review of imaging studies. PLOS Ment Health 1(1): e0000022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022

Editor: Kizito Omona, Uganda Martyrs University, UGANDA

Received: December 29, 2023; Accepted: March 18, 2024; Published: June 4, 2024

Copyright: © 2024 Chang, Lee. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The behavioural addiction brought on by excessive internet use has become a rising source of concern [ 1 ] since the last decade. According to clinical studies, individuals with Internet Addiction (IA) or Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) may have a range of biopsychosocial effects and is classified as an impulse-control disorder owing to its resemblance to pathological gambling and substance addiction [ 2 , 3 ]. IA has been defined by researchers as a person’s inability to resist the urge to use the internet, which has negative effects on their psychological well-being as well as their social, academic, and professional lives [ 4 ]. The symptoms can have serious physical and interpersonal repercussions and are linked to mood modification, salience, tolerance, impulsivity, and conflict [ 5 ]. In severe circumstances, people may experience severe pain in their bodies or health issues like carpal tunnel syndrome, dry eyes, irregular eating and disrupted sleep [ 6 ]. Additionally, IA is significantly linked to comorbidities with other psychiatric disorders [ 7 ].

Stevens et al (2021) reviewed 53 studies including 17 countries and reported the global prevalence of IA was 3.05% [ 8 ]. Asian countries had a higher prevalence (5.1%) than European countries (2.7%) [ 8 ]. Strikingly, adolescents and young adults had a global IGD prevalence rate of 9.9% which matches previous literature that reported historically higher prevalence among adolescent populations compared to adults [ 8 , 9 ]. Over 80% of adolescent population in the UK, the USA, and Asia have direct access to the internet [ 10 ]. Children and adolescents frequently spend more time on media (possibly 7 hours and 22 minutes per day) than at school or sleeping [ 11 ]. Developing nations have also shown a sharp rise in teenage internet usage despite having lower internet penetration rates [ 10 ]. Concerns regarding the possible harms that overt internet use could do to adolescents and their development have arisen because of this surge, especially the significant impacts by the COVID-19 pandemic [ 12 ]. The growing prevalence and neurocognitive consequences of IA among adolescents makes this population a vital area of study [ 13 ].

Adolescence is a crucial developmental stage during which people go through significant changes in their biology, cognition, and personalities [ 14 ]. Adolescents’ emotional-behavioural functioning is hyperactivated, which creates risk of psychopathological vulnerability [ 15 ]. In accordance with clinical study results [ 16 ], this emotional hyperactivity is supported by a high level of neuronal plasticity. This plasticity enables teenagers to adapt to the numerous physical and emotional changes that occur during puberty as well as develop communication techniques and gain independence [ 16 ]. However, the strong neuronal plasticity is also associated with risk-taking and sensation seeking [ 17 ] which may lead to IA.

Despite the fact that the precise neuronal mechanisms underlying IA are still largely unclear, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) method has been used by scientists as an important framework to examine the neuropathological changes occurring in IA, particularly in the form of functional connectivity (FC) [ 18 ]. fMRI research study has shown that IA alters both the functional and structural makeup of the brain [ 3 ].

We hypothesise that IA has widespread neurological alteration effects rather than being limited to a few specific brain regions. Further hypothesis holds that according to these alterations of FC between the brain regions or certain neural networks, adolescents with IA would experience behavioural changes. An investigation of these domains could be useful for creating better procedures and standards as well as minimising the negative effects of overt internet use. This literature review aims to summarise and analyse the evidence of various imaging studies that have investigated the effects of IA on the FC in adolescents. This will be addressed through two research questions:

• How does internet addiction affect the functional connectivity in the adolescent brain?
• How is adolescent behaviour and development impacted by functional connectivity changes due to internet addiction?

The review protocol was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (see S1 Checklist ).

Search strategy and selection process

A systematic search was conducted up until April 2023 from two sources of database, PubMed and PsycINFO, using a range of terms relevant to the title and research questions (see full list of search terms in S1 Appendix ). All the searched articles can be accessed in the S1 Data . The eligible articles were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria used for the present review were: (i) participants in the studies with clinical diagnosis of IA; (ii) participants between the ages of 10 and 19; (iii) imaging research investigations; (iv) works published between January 2013 and April 2023; (v) written in English language; (vi) peer-reviewed papers and (vii) full text. The numbers of articles excluded due to not meeting the inclusion criteria are shown in Fig 1 . Each study’s title and abstract were screened for eligibility.

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger image
• TIFF original image

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022.g001

Quality appraisal

Full texts of all potentially relevant studies were then retrieved and further appraised for eligibility. Furthermore, articles were critically appraised based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) framework to evaluate the individual study for both quality and bias. The subsequent quality levels were then appraised to each article and listed as either low, moderate, or high.

Data collection process

Data that satisfied the inclusion requirements was entered into an excel sheet for data extraction and further selection. An article’s author, publication year, country, age range, participant sample size, sex, area of interest, measures, outcome and article quality were all included in the data extraction spreadsheet. Studies looking at FC, for instance, were grouped, while studies looking at FC in specific area were further divided into sub-groups.

Data synthesis and analysis

Articles were classified according to their location in the brain as well as the network or pathway they were a part of to create a coherent narrative between the selected studies. Conclusions concerning various research trends relevant to particular groupings were drawn from these groupings and subgroupings. To maintain the offered information in a prominent manner, these assertions were entered into the data extraction excel spreadsheet.

With the search performed on the selected databases, 238 articles in total were identified (see Fig 1 ). 15 duplicated articles were eliminated, and another 6 items were removed for various other reasons. Title and abstract screening eliminated 184 articles because they were not in English (number of article, n, = 7), did not include imaging components (n = 47), had adult participants (n = 53), did not have a clinical diagnosis of IA (n = 19), did not address FC in the brain (n = 20), and were published outside the desired timeframe (n = 38). A further 21 papers were eliminated for failing to meet inclusion requirements after the remaining 33 articles underwent full-text eligibility screening. A total of 12 papers were deemed eligible for this review analysis.

Characteristics of the included studies, as depicted in the data extraction sheet in Table 1 provide information of the author(s), publication year, sample size, study location, age range, gender, area of interest, outcome, measures used and quality appraisal. Most of the studies in this review utilised resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques (n = 7), with several studies demonstrating task-based fMRI procedures (n = 3), and the remaining studies utilising whole-brain imaging measures (n = 2). The studies were all conducted in Asiatic countries, specifically coming from China (8), Korea (3), and Indonesia (1). Sample sizes ranged from 12 to 31 participants with most of the imaging studies having comparable sample sizes. Majority of the studies included a mix of male and female participants (n = 8) with several studies having a male only participant pool (n = 3). All except one of the mixed gender studies had a majority male participant pool. One study did not disclose their data on the gender demographics of their experiment. Study years ranged from 2013–2022, with 2 studies in 2013, 3 studies in 2014, 3 studies in 2015, 1 study in 2017, 1 study in 2020, 1 study in 2021, and 1 study in 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022.t001

(1) How does internet addiction affect the functional connectivity in the adolescent brain?

The included studies were organised according to the brain region or network that they were observing. The specific networks affected by IA were the default mode network, executive control system, salience network and reward pathway. These networks are vital components of adolescent behaviour and development [ 31 ]. The studies in each section were then grouped into subsections according to their specific brain regions within their network.

Default mode network (DMN)/reward network.

Out of the 12 studies, 3 have specifically studied the default mode network (DMN), and 3 observed whole-brain FC that partially included components of the DMN. The effect of IA on the various centres of the DMN was not unilaterally the same. The findings illustrate a complex mix of increases and decreases in FC depending on the specific region in the DMN (see Table 2 and Fig 2 ). The alteration of FC in posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) in the DMN was the most frequently reported area in adolescents with IA, which involved in attentional processes [ 32 ], but Lee et al. (2020) additionally found alterations of FC in other brain regions, such as anterior insula cortex, a node in the DMN that controls the integration of motivational and cognitive processes [ 20 ].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022.g002

The overall changes of functional connectivity in the brain network including default mode network (DMN), executive control network (ECN), salience network (SN) and reward network. IA = Internet Addiction, FC = Functional Connectivity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022.t002

Ding et al. (2013) revealed altered FC in the cerebellum, the middle temporal gyrus, and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) [ 22 ]. They found that the bilateral inferior parietal lobule, left superior parietal lobule, and right inferior temporal gyrus had decreased FC, while the bilateral posterior lobe of the cerebellum and the medial temporal gyrus had increased FC [ 22 ]. The right middle temporal gyrus was found to have 111 cluster voxels (t = 3.52, p<0.05) and the right inferior parietal lobule was found to have 324 cluster voxels (t = -4.07, p<0.05) with an extent threshold of 54 voxels (figures above this threshold are deemed significant) [ 22 ]. Additionally, there was a negative correlation, with 95 cluster voxels (p<0.05) between the FC of the left superior parietal lobule and the PCC with the Chen Internet Addiction Scores (CIAS) which are used to determine the severity of IA [ 22 ]. On the other hand, in regions of the reward system, connection with the PCC was positively connected with CIAS scores [ 22 ]. The most significant was the right praecuneus with 219 cluster voxels (p<0.05) [ 22 ]. Wang et al. (2017) also discovered that adolescents with IA had 33% less FC in the left inferior parietal lobule and 20% less FC in the dorsal mPFC [ 24 ]. A potential connection between the effects of substance use and overt internet use is revealed by the generally decreased FC in these areas of the DMN of teenagers with drug addiction and IA [ 35 ].

The putamen was one of the main regions of reduced FC in adolescents with IA [ 19 ]. The putamen and the insula-operculum demonstrated significant group differences regarding functional connectivity with a cluster size of 251 and an extent threshold of 250 (Z = 3.40, p<0.05) [ 19 ]. The molecular mechanisms behind addiction disorders have been intimately connected to decreased striatal dopaminergic function [ 19 ], making this function crucial.

Executive Control Network (ECN).

5 studies out of 12 have specifically viewed parts of the executive control network (ECN) and 3 studies observed whole-brain FC. The effects of IA on the ECN’s constituent parts were consistent across all the studies examined for this analysis (see Table 2 and Fig 3 ). The results showed a notable decline in all the ECN’s major centres. Li et al. (2014) used fMRI imaging and a behavioural task to study response inhibition in adolescents with IA [ 25 ] and found decreased activation at the striatum and frontal gyrus, particularly a reduction in FC at inferior frontal gyrus, in the IA group compared to controls [ 25 ]. The inferior frontal gyrus showed a reduction in FC in comparison to the controls with a cluster size of 71 (t = 4.18, p<0.05) [ 25 ]. In addition, the frontal-basal ganglia pathways in the adolescents with IA showed little effective connection between areas and increased degrees of response inhibition [ 25 ].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022.g003

Lin et al. (2015) found that adolescents with IA demonstrated disrupted corticostriatal FC compared to controls [ 33 ]. The corticostriatal circuitry experienced decreased connectivity with the caudate, bilateral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), as well as the striatum and frontal gyrus [ 33 ]. The inferior ventral striatum showed significantly reduced FC with the subcallosal ACC and caudate head with cluster size of 101 (t = -4.64, p<0.05) [ 33 ]. Decreased FC in the caudate implies dysfunction of the corticostriatal-limbic circuitry involved in cognitive and emotional control [ 36 ]. The decrease in FC in both the striatum and frontal gyrus is related to inhibitory control, a common deficit seen with disruptions with the ECN [ 33 ].

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), ACC, and right supplementary motor area (SMA) of the prefrontal cortex were all found to have significantly decreased grey matter volume [ 29 ]. In addition, the DLPFC, insula, temporal cortices, as well as significant subcortical regions like the striatum and thalamus, showed decreased FC [ 29 ]. According to Tremblay (2009), the striatum plays a significant role in the processing of rewards, decision-making, and motivation [ 37 ]. Chen et al. (2020) reported that the IA group demonstrated increased impulsivity as well as decreased reaction inhibition using a Stroop colour-word task [ 26 ]. Furthermore, Chen et al. (2020) observed that the left DLPFC and dorsal striatum experienced a negative connection efficiency value, specifically demonstrating that the dorsal striatum activity suppressed the left DLPFC [ 27 ].

Salience network (SN).

Out of the 12 chosen studies, 3 studies specifically looked at the salience network (SN) and 3 studies have observed whole-brain FC. Relative to the DMN and ECN, the findings on the SN were slightly sparser. Despite this, adolescents with IA demonstrated a moderate decrease in FC, as well as other measures like fibre connectivity and cognitive control, when compared to healthy control (see Table 2 and Fig 4 ).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022.g004

Xing et al. (2014) used both dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and insula to test FC changes in the SN of adolescents with IA and found decreased structural connectivity in the SN as well as decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) that correlated to behaviour performance in the Stroop colour word-task [ 21 ]. They examined the dACC and insula to determine whether the SN’s disrupted connectivity may be linked to the SN’s disruption of regulation, which would explain the impaired cognitive control seen in adolescents with IA. However, researchers did not find significant FC differences in the SN when compared to the controls [ 21 ]. These results provided evidence for the structural changes in the interconnectivity within SN in adolescents with IA.

Wang et al. (2017) investigated network interactions between the DMN, ECN, SN and reward pathway in IA subjects [ 24 ] (see Fig 5 ), and found 40% reduction of FC between the DMN and specific regions of the SN, such as the insula, in comparison to the controls (p = 0.008) [ 24 ]. The anterior insula and dACC are two areas that are impacted by this altered FC [ 24 ]. This finding supports the idea that IA has similar neurobiological abnormalities with other addictive illnesses, which is in line with a study that discovered disruptive changes in the SN and DMN’s interaction in cocaine addiction [ 38 ]. The insula has also been linked to the intensity of symptoms and has been implicated in the development of IA [ 39 ].

“+” indicates an increase in behaivour; “-”indicates a decrease in behaviour; solid arrows indicate a direct network interaction; and the dotted arrows indicates a reduction in network interaction. This diagram depicts network interactions juxtaposed with engaging in internet related behaviours. Through the neural interactions, the diagram illustrates how the networks inhibit or amplify internet usage and vice versa. Furthermore, it demonstrates how the SN mediates both the DMN and ECN.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022.g005

(2) How is adolescent behaviour and development impacted by functional connectivity changes due to internet addiction?

The findings that IA individuals demonstrate an overall decrease in FC in the DMN is supported by numerous research [ 24 ]. Drug addict populations also exhibited similar decline in FC in the DMN [ 40 ]. The disruption of attentional orientation and self-referential processing for both substance and behavioural addiction was then hypothesised to be caused by DMN anomalies in FC [ 41 ].

In adolescents with IA, decline of FC in the parietal lobule affects visuospatial task-related behaviour [ 22 ], short-term memory [ 42 ], and the ability of controlling attention or restraining motor responses during response inhibition tests [ 42 ]. Cue-induced gaming cravings are influenced by the DMN [ 43 ]. A visual processing area called the praecuneus links gaming cues to internal information [ 22 ]. A meta-analysis found that the posterior cingulate cortex activity of individuals with IA during cue-reactivity tasks was connected with their gaming time [ 44 ], suggesting that excessive gaming may impair DMN function and that individuals with IA exert more cognitive effort to control it. Findings for the behavioural consequences of FC changes in the DMN illustrate its underlying role in regulating impulsivity, self-monitoring, and cognitive control.

Furthermore, Ding et al. (2013) reported an activation of components of the reward pathway, including areas like the nucleus accumbens, praecuneus, SMA, caudate, and thalamus, in connection to the DMN [ 22 ]. The increased FC of the limbic and reward networks have been confirmed to be a major biomarker for IA [ 45 , 46 ]. The increased reinforcement in these networks increases the strength of reward stimuli and makes it more difficult for other networks, namely the ECN, to down-regulate the increased attention [ 29 ] (See Fig 5 ).

Executive control network (ECN).

The numerous IA-affected components in the ECN have a role in a variety of behaviours that are connected to both response inhibition and emotional regulation [ 47 ]. For instance, brain regions like the striatum, which are linked to impulsivity and the reward system, are heavily involved in the act of playing online games [ 47 ]. Online game play activates the striatum, which suppresses the left DLPFC in ECN [ 48 ]. As a result, people with IA may find it difficult to control their want to play online games [ 48 ]. This system thus causes impulsive and protracted gaming conduct, lack of inhibitory control leading to the continued use of internet in an overt manner despite a variety of negative effects, personal distress, and signs of psychological dependence [ 33 ] (See Fig 5 ).

Wang et al. (2017) report that disruptions in cognitive control networks within the ECN are frequently linked to characteristics of substance addiction [ 24 ]. With samples that were addicted to heroin and cocaine, previous studies discovered abnormal FC in the ECN and the PFC [ 49 ]. Electronic gaming is known to promote striatal dopamine release, similar to drug addiction [ 50 ]. According to Drgonova and Walther (2016), it is hypothesised that dopamine could stimulate the reward system of the striatum in the brain, leading to a loss of impulse control and a failure of prefrontal lobe executive inhibitory control [ 51 ]. In the end, IA’s resemblance to drug use disorders may point to vital biomarkers or underlying mechanisms that explain how cognitive control and impulsive behaviour are related.

A task-related fMRI study found that the decrease in FC between the left DLPFC and dorsal striatum was congruent with an increase in impulsivity in adolescents with IA [ 26 ]. The lack of response inhibition from the ECN results in a loss of control over internet usage and a reduced capacity to display goal-directed behaviour [ 33 ]. Previous studies have linked the alteration of the ECN in IA with higher cue reactivity and impaired ability to self-regulate internet specific stimuli [ 52 ].

Salience network (SN)/ other networks.

Xing et al. (2014) investigated the significance of the SN regarding cognitive control in teenagers with IA [ 21 ]. The SN, which is composed of the ACC and insula, has been demonstrated to control dynamic changes in other networks to modify cognitive performance [ 21 ]. The ACC is engaged in conflict monitoring and cognitive control, according to previous neuroimaging research [ 53 ]. The insula is a region that integrates interoceptive states into conscious feelings [ 54 ]. The results from Xing et al. (2014) showed declines in the SN regarding its structural connectivity and fractional anisotropy, even though they did not observe any appreciable change in FC in the IA participants [ 21 ]. Due to the small sample size, the results may have indicated that FC methods are not sensitive enough to detect the significant functional changes [ 21 ]. However, task performance behaviours associated with impaired cognitive control in adolescents with IA were correlated with these findings [ 21 ]. Our comprehension of the SN’s broader function in IA can be enhanced by this relationship.

Research study supports the idea that different psychological issues are caused by the functional reorganisation of expansive brain networks, such that strong association between SN and DMN may provide neurological underpinnings at the system level for the uncontrollable character of internet-using behaviours [ 24 ]. In the study by Wang et al. (2017), the decreased interconnectivity between the SN and DMN, comprising regions such the DLPFC and the insula, suggests that adolescents with IA may struggle to effectively inhibit DMN activity during internally focused processing, leading to poorly managed desires or preoccupations to use the internet [ 24 ] (See Fig 5 ). Subsequently, this may cause a failure to inhibit DMN activity as well as a restriction of ECN functionality [ 55 ]. As a result, the adolescent experiences an increased salience and sensitivity towards internet addicting cues making it difficult to avoid these triggers [ 56 ].

The primary aim of this review was to present a summary of how internet addiction impacts on the functional connectivity of adolescent brain. Subsequently, the influence of IA on the adolescent brain was compartmentalised into three sections: alterations of FC at various brain regions, specific FC relationships, and behavioural/developmental changes. Overall, the specific effects of IA on the adolescent brain were not completely clear, given the variety of FC changes. However, there were overarching behavioural, network and developmental trends that were supported that provided insight on adolescent development.

The first hypothesis that was held about this question was that IA was widespread and would be regionally similar to substance-use and gambling addiction. After conducting a review of the information in the chosen articles, the hypothesis was predictably supported. The regions of the brain affected by IA are widespread and influence multiple networks, mainly DMN, ECN, SN and reward pathway. In the DMN, there was a complex mix of increases and decreases within the network. However, in the ECN, the alterations of FC were more unilaterally decreased, but the findings of SN and reward pathway were not quite clear. Overall, the FC changes within adolescents with IA are very much network specific and lay a solid foundation from which to understand the subsequent behaviour changes that arise from the disorder.

The second hypothesis placed emphasis on the importance of between network interactions and within network interactions in the continuation of IA and the development of its behavioural symptoms. The results from the findings involving the networks, DMN, SN, ECN and reward system, support this hypothesis (see Fig 5 ). Studies confirm the influence of all these neural networks on reward valuation, impulsivity, salience to stimuli, cue reactivity and other changes that alter behaviour towards the internet use. Many of these changes are connected to the inherent nature of the adolescent brain.

There are multiple explanations that underlie the vulnerability of the adolescent brain towards IA related urges. Several of them have to do with the inherent nature and underlying mechanisms of the adolescent brain. Children’s emotional, social, and cognitive capacities grow exponentially during childhood and adolescence [ 57 ]. Early teenagers go through a process called “social reorientation” that is characterised by heightened sensitivity to social cues and peer connections [ 58 ]. Adolescents’ improvements in their social skills coincide with changes in their brains’ anatomical and functional organisation [ 59 ]. Functional hubs exhibit growing connectivity strength [ 60 ], suggesting increased functional integration during development. During this time, the brain’s functional networks change from an anatomically dominant structure to a scattered architecture [ 60 ].

The adolescent brain is very responsive to synaptic reorganisation and experience cues [ 61 ]. As a result, one of the distinguishing traits of the maturation of adolescent brains is the variation in neural network trajectory [ 62 ]. Important weaknesses of the adolescent brain that may explain the neurobiological change brought on by external stimuli are illustrated by features like the functional gaps between networks and the inadequate segregation of networks [ 62 ].

The implications of these findings towards adolescent behaviour are significant. Although the exact changes and mechanisms are not fully clear, the observed changes in functional connectivity have the capacity of influencing several aspects of adolescent development. For example, functional connectivity has been utilised to investigate attachment styles in adolescents [ 63 ]. It was observed that adolescent attachment styles were negatively associated with caudate-prefrontal connectivity, but positively with the putamen-visual area connectivity [ 63 ]. Both named areas were also influenced by the onset of internet addiction, possibly providing a connection between the two. Another study associated neighbourhood/socioeconomic disadvantage with functional connectivity alterations in the DMN and dorsal attention network [ 64 ]. The study also found multivariate brain behaviour relationships between the altered/disadvantaged functional connectivity and mental health and cognition [ 64 ]. This conclusion supports the notion that the functional connectivity alterations observed in IA are associated with specific adolescent behaviours as well as the fact that functional connectivity can be utilised as a platform onto which to compare various neurologic conditions.

Limitations/strengths

There were several limitations that were related to the conduction of the review as well as the data extracted from the articles. Firstly, the study followed a systematic literature review design when analysing the fMRI studies. The data pulled from these imaging studies were namely qualitative and were subject to bias contrasting the quantitative nature of statistical analysis. Components of the study, such as sample sizes, effect sizes, and demographics were not weighted or controlled. The second limitation brought up by a similar review was the lack of a universal consensus of terminology given IA [ 47 ]. Globally, authors writing about this topic use an array of terminology including online gaming addiction, internet addiction, internet gaming disorder, and problematic internet use. Often, authors use multiple terms interchangeably which makes it difficult to depict the subtle similarities and differences between the terms.

Reviewing the explicit limitations in each of the included studies, two major limitations were brought up in many of the articles. One was relating to the cross-sectional nature of the included studies. Due to the inherent qualities of a cross-sectional study, the studies did not provide clear evidence that IA played a causal role towards the development of the adolescent brain. While several biopsychosocial factors mediate these interactions, task-based measures that combine executive functions with imaging results reinforce the assumed connection between the two that is utilised by the papers studying IA. Another limitation regarded the small sample size of the included studies, which averaged to around 20 participants. The small sample size can influence the generalisation of the results as well as the effectiveness of statistical analyses. Ultimately, both included study specific limitations illustrate the need for future studies to clarify the causal relationship between the alterations of FC and the development of IA.

Another vital limitation was the limited number of studies applying imaging techniques for investigations on IA in adolescents were a uniformly Far East collection of studies. The reason for this was because the studies included in this review were the only fMRI studies that were found that adhered to the strict adolescent age restriction. The adolescent age range given by the WHO (10–19 years old) [ 65 ] was strictly followed. It is important to note that a multitude of studies found in the initial search utilised an older adolescent demographic that was slightly higher than the WHO age range and had a mean age that was outside of the limitations. As a result, the results of this review are biased and based on the 12 studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Regarding the global nature of the research, although the journals that the studies were published in were all established western journals, the collection of studies were found to all originate from Asian countries, namely China and Korea. Subsequently, it pulls into question if the results and measures from these studies are generalisable towards a western population. As stated previously, Asian countries have a higher prevalence of IA, which may be the reasoning to why the majority of studies are from there [ 8 ]. However, in an additional search including other age groups, it was found that a high majority of all FC studies on IA were done in Asian countries. Interestingly, western papers studying fMRI FC were primarily focused on gambling and substance-use addiction disorders. The western papers on IA were less focused on fMRI FC but more on other components of IA such as sleep, game-genre, and other non-imaging related factors. This demonstrated an overall lack of western fMRI studies on IA. It is important to note that both western and eastern fMRI studies on IA presented an overall lack on children and adolescents in general.

Despite the several limitations, this review provided a clear reflection on the state of the data. The strengths of the review include the strict inclusion/exclusion criteria that filtered through studies and only included ones that contained a purely adolescent sample. As a result, the information presented in this review was specific to the review’s aims. Given the sparse nature of adolescent specific fMRI studies on the FC changes in IA, this review successfully provided a much-needed niche representation of adolescent specific results. Furthermore, the review provided a thorough functional explanation of the DMN, ECN, SN and reward pathway making it accessible to readers new to the topic.

Future directions and implications

Through the search process of the review, there were more imaging studies focused on older adolescence and adulthood. Furthermore, finding a review that covered a strictly adolescent population, focused on FC changes, and was specifically depicting IA, was proven difficult. Many related reviews, such as Tereshchenko and Kasparov (2019), looked at risk factors related to the biopsychosocial model, but did not tackle specific alterations in specific structural or functional changes in the brain [ 66 ]. Weinstein (2017) found similar structural and functional results as well as the role IA has in altering response inhibition and reward valuation in adolescents with IA [ 47 ]. Overall, the accumulated findings only paint an emerging pattern which aligns with similar substance-use and gambling disorders. Future studies require more specificity in depicting the interactions between neural networks, as well as more literature on adolescent and comorbid populations. One future field of interest is the incorporation of more task-based fMRI data. Advances in resting-state fMRI methods have yet to be reflected or confirmed in task-based fMRI methods [ 62 ]. Due to the fact that network connectivity is shaped by different tasks, it is critical to confirm that the findings of the resting state fMRI studies also apply to the task based ones [ 62 ]. Subsequently, work in this area will confirm if intrinsic connectivity networks function in resting state will function similarly during goal directed behaviour [ 62 ]. An elevated focus on adolescent populations as well as task-based fMRI methodology will help uncover to what extent adolescent network connectivity maturation facilitates behavioural and cognitive development [ 62 ].

A treatment implication is the potential usage of bupropion for the treatment of IA. Bupropion has been previously used to treat patients with gambling disorder and has been effective in decreasing overall gambling behaviour as well as money spent while gambling [ 67 ]. Bae et al. (2018) found a decrease in clinical symptoms of IA in line with a 12-week bupropion treatment [ 31 ]. The study found that bupropion altered the FC of both the DMN and ECN which in turn decreased impulsivity and attentional deficits for the individuals with IA [ 31 ]. Interventions like bupropion illustrate the importance of understanding the fundamental mechanisms that underlie disorders like IA.

The goal for this review was to summarise the current literature on functional connectivity changes in adolescents with internet addiction. The findings answered the primary research questions that were directed at FC alterations within several networks of the adolescent brain and how that influenced their behaviour and development. Overall, the research demonstrated several wide-ranging effects that influenced the DMN, SN, ECN, and reward centres. Additionally, the findings gave ground to important details such as the maturation of the adolescent brain, the high prevalence of Asian originated studies, and the importance of task-based studies in this field. The process of making this review allowed for a thorough understanding IA and adolescent brain interactions.

Given the influx of technology and media in the lives and education of children and adolescents, an increase in prevalence and focus on internet related behavioural changes is imperative towards future children/adolescent mental health. Events such as COVID-19 act to expose the consequences of extended internet usage on the development and lifestyle of specifically young people. While it is important for parents and older generations to be wary of these changes, it is important for them to develop a base understanding of the issue and not dismiss it as an all-bad or all-good scenario. Future research on IA will aim to better understand the causal relationship between IA and psychological symptoms that coincide with it. The current literature regarding functional connectivity changes in adolescents is limited and requires future studies to test with larger sample sizes, comorbid populations, and populations outside Far East Asia.

This review aimed to demonstrate the inner workings of how IA alters the connection between the primary behavioural networks in the adolescent brain. Predictably, the present answers merely paint an unfinished picture that does not necessarily depict internet usage as overwhelmingly positive or negative. Alternatively, the research points towards emerging patterns that can direct individuals on the consequences of certain variables or risk factors. A clearer depiction of the mechanisms of IA would allow physicians to screen and treat the onset of IA more effectively. Clinically, this could be in the form of more streamlined and accurate sessions of CBT or family therapy, targeting key symptoms of IA. Alternatively clinicians could potentially prescribe treatment such as bupropion to target FC in certain regions of the brain. Furthermore, parental education on IA is another possible avenue of prevention from a public health standpoint. Parents who are aware of the early signs and onset of IA will more effectively handle screen time, impulsivity, and minimize the risk factors surrounding IA.

Additionally, an increased attention towards internet related fMRI research is needed in the West, as mentioned previously. Despite cultural differences, Western countries may hold similarities to the eastern countries with a high prevalence of IA, like China and Korea, regarding the implications of the internet and IA. The increasing influence of the internet on the world may contribute to an overall increase in the global prevalence of IA. Nonetheless, the high saturation of eastern studies in this field should be replicated with a Western sample to determine if the same FC alterations occur. A growing interest in internet related research and education within the West will hopefully lead to the knowledge of healthier internet habits and coping strategies among parents with children and adolescents. Furthermore, IA research has the potential to become a crucial proxy for which to study adolescent brain maturation and development.

Supporting information

S1 checklist. prisma checklist..

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022.s001

S1 Appendix. Search strategies with all the terms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022.s002

S1 Data. Article screening records with details of categorized content.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000022.s003

Acknowledgments

The authors thank https://www.stockio.com/free-clipart/brain-01 (with attribution to Stockio.com); and https://www.rawpixel.com/image/6442258/png-sticker-vintage for the free images used to create Figs 2 – 4 .

• View Article
• PubMed/NCBI
• Google Scholar
• 2. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5 ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
• 10. Stats IW. World Internet Users Statistics and World Population Stats 2013 [ http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm .
• 11. Rideout VJR M. B. The common sense census: media use by tweens and teens. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media; 2019.
• 37. Tremblay L. The Ventral Striatum. Handbook of Reward and Decision Making: Academic Press; 2009.
• 57. Bhana A. Middle childhood and pre-adolescence. Promoting mental health in scarce-resource contexts: emerging evidence and practice. Cape Town: HSRC Press; 2010. p. 124–42.
• 65. Organization WH. Adolescent Health 2023 [ https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_1 .

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Curr Dev Nutr

The Effects of Vinegar/Acetic Acid Intake on Appetite Measures and Energy Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review

Faten hasan.

University of Virginia

Kristen Hamilton

Siddhartha angadi, sibylle kranz.

Research suggests the active ingredient in vinegar, acetic acid, may reduce appetite, thereby reducing energy consumption. This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of vinegar or acetic acid on appetite and subsequent food intake in humans in the published literature.

All human subject studies, regardless of age or health status. A search using MedLine (Ovid), PubMed, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library between January to April 2021 resulted in 12 papers. One of the publications by Darzi et al. combined the findings of two independent studies and was therefore treated as two separate studies in this review ( study 1 ” and “Darzi study 2 ). Outcomes included appetite, measured using an appetite rating scale or visual analog scale, satiation, measured as food intake of intervention meal, and satiety, measured as the amount of food intake following vinegar or acetic acid consumption.

Seven short-term studies were crossover randomized controlled trials (RCT) investigating the effect of a single vinegar exposure with satiety or appetite as the primary outcome. Six long-term studies were parallel-group RCTs with repeated vinegar exposure, ranging from 4 to 12 weeks. These studies compared energy intake before and after the vinegar/acetic acid intervention. The short-term interventions indicated that vinegar containing at least 24.6 mmol acetic acid when consumed alongside a meal containing solid foods, acutely suppressed appetite up to 120 minutes postprandially, and ad libitum food intake three- and 24-hours after vinegar consumption. However, results from the long-term studies found no effect on appetite suppression.

Conclusions

Overall, four of the six short-term studies reported that vinegar suppressed appetite, while none of the long-term studies were able to reproduce these results. Further research is needed to determine whether oral vinegar consumption may result in long-term appetite reduction, decrease energy intake, and potentially aid in weight loss.

Funding Sources

Not applicable.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Cannabidiol (CBD) as a treatment of acute and chronic back pain: A case series and literature review

Affiliations.

• 1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Portsmouth Anesthesia Associates, Ports-mouth, Virginia.
• 2 Department of Chemistry, University of California, San Diego, California.
• 3 Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California.
• 4 Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreve-port, Louisiana.
• 5 Department of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Or-leans, Louisiana.
• PMID: 32421842
• DOI: 10.5055/jom.2020.0570

Objective: Two patient case reports are presented describing the use of cannabidiol (CBD) for the symptomatic relief of a lumbar compression fracture and in the mitigation of thoracic discomfort and dysesthesia secondary to a surgically resected meningioma.

Discussion: CBD appears to have antisnociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects on opioid-naive patients with neuro-pathic and radicular pain. Of note, the patients in this case series used the same CBD cream: Baskin Essentials Body Wellness Cream (400 mg CBD per two oz.) Conclusion: Hemp-derived CBD in a transdermal cream provided significant symptom and pain relief for the patients described in this case series. Based on these results, we believe further investigation is warranted to see if CBD-containing products should have a more prominent role in the treatment of acute and chronic pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Evaluation of the effects of CBD hemp extract on opioid use and quality of life indicators in chronic pain patients: a prospective cohort study. Capano A, Weaver R, Burkman E. Capano A, et al. Postgrad Med. 2020 Jan;132(1):56-61. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1685298. Epub 2019 Nov 12. Postgrad Med. 2020. PMID: 31711352 Clinical Trial.
• The Role of Cannabidiol (CBD) in Chronic Pain Management: An Assessment of Current Evidence. Boyaji S, Merkow J, Elman RNM, Kaye AD, Yong RJ, Urman RD. Boyaji S, et al. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Jan 24;24(2):4. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-0835-4. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020. PMID: 31980957 Review.
• Clinicians' Guide to Cannabidiol and Hemp Oils. VanDolah HJ, Bauer BA, Mauck KF. VanDolah HJ, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Sep;94(9):1840-1851. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Aug 22. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019. PMID: 31447137 Review.
• The Effectiveness of Topical Cannabidiol Oil in Symptomatic Relief of Peripheral Neuropathy of the Lower Extremities. Xu DH, Cullen BD, Tang M, Fang Y. Xu DH, et al. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2020;21(5):390-402. doi: 10.2174/1389201020666191202111534. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2020. PMID: 31793418 Clinical Trial.
• Substituting Cannabidiol for Opioids and Pain Medications Among Individuals With Fibromyalgia: A Large Online Survey. Boehnke KF, Gagnier JJ, Matallana L, Williams DA. Boehnke KF, et al. J Pain. 2021 Nov;22(11):1418-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 13. J Pain. 2021. PMID: 33992787 Free PMC article.
• Integrating fecal metabolomics and intestinal microbiota to study the mechanism of cannabidiol in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sun M, Zhang F, Lu F, Yu D, Wang Y, Chen P, Liu S. Sun M, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 6;15:1358626. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1358626. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38379898 Free PMC article.
• Assessing Dose- and Sex-Dependent Antinociceptive Effects of Cannabidiol and Amitriptyline, Alone and in Combination, and Exploring Mechanism of Action Involving Serotonin 1A Receptors. Barnes RC, Banjara S, McHann MC, Almodovar S, Henderson-Redmond AN, Morgan DJ, Castro-Piedras I, Guindon J. Barnes RC, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2024 Jan 17;388(2):655-669. doi: 10.1124/jpet.123.001855. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2024. PMID: 38129125 Free PMC article.
• Medical Cannabis and Its Efficacy/Effectiveness for the Treatment of Low-Back Pain: a Systematic Review. Lee C, Danielson EC, Beestrum M, Eurich DT, Knapp A, Jordan N. Lee C, et al. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023 Dec;27(12):821-835. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01189-0. Epub 2023 Dec 2. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023. PMID: 38041708 Review.
• The Main Therapeutic Applications of Cannabidiol (CBD) and Its Potential Effects on Aging with Respect to Alzheimer's Disease. Trojan V, Landa L, Šulcová A, Slíva J, Hřib R. Trojan V, et al. Biomolecules. 2023 Sep 26;13(10):1446. doi: 10.3390/biom13101446. Biomolecules. 2023. PMID: 37892128 Free PMC article. Review.
• A Systematic Review on Cannabinoids for Neuropathic Pain Administered by Routes Other than Oral or Inhalation. Quintero JM, Pulido G, Giraldo LF, Leon MX, Diaz LE, Bustos RH. Quintero JM, et al. Plants (Basel). 2022 May 20;11(10):1357. doi: 10.3390/plants11101357. Plants (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35631782 Free PMC article. Review.

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

Related information

• PubChem Compound (MeSH Keyword)

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
• MedlinePlus Health Information
• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Online Courses, College Classes, & Test Prep Courses

Study.com's self-paced video courses are created by the best teachers and designed to help you meet your educational goals. They will help you improve your grades, better understand concepts from class, and prepare for tests. Most video lessons are 10 minutes or less, so you get the information you need in a fast and fun format.

Browse or filter through the courses below to find one you want to preview. See for yourself why over 30 million students a month use Study.com.

Easily Master Any Subject

Watch short, fun videos taught by great teachers

Education Level

Filter your results, course type.

No results match your current filter set. Please revise your filter set to expand your results

Popular courses.

Study.com was one of the best aids when I wanted to get my licensure and the ability to grow in another area. Study.com provided everything I needed and answered all my questions for continued education.

Study.com helped me with two major tests. It was easy to use and it got me a social work license as well as my teaching certification. I am a huge advocate for the program. The pacing is great and the text and videos are helpful.

I am in education, and needed to take an exam to add another credential to my certification. Study.com had the best study guide available for the money and it is broken up into easy to learn modules. This certification is a doozy and the bite sized lessons are not so overwhelming, easy to process and retain.

Study.com is awesome!! They simplified the math concepts for me and I passed it on my first attempt. The videos are precise and clear. You cannot go wrong with Study.com. I recommend it.

This was the most helpful studying service I have ever received. I have tried multiple services, lots of studying on my own, and flash cards. I have failed many times and couldn't do better. This was the one that helped me the most and at the end I finally passed.

The app is simple and the practice tests helped me know specifically what I needed to study. Passed my test with flying colors thanks to study.com!

Perfect for what I needed it for! The quizzes and lessons were thorough and I got in a few practice tests before my real one.

The lessons were relevant and easy to understand. I loved that I could watch videos and use audio mode to listen while driving or doing other things.

This website was a great resource for me when I was studying for my certification tests. Study.com helped me to pass my tests, and I don't know if I could have achieved that without this resource!

Excellent content. It was directly related to my test. Study.com really did a good job at getting to the meat and potatoes of the content.

This service is fantastic! Not only did I passed all the exams I was studying for, I learned something from my studies rather than just memorizing boring facts to be lost in a brain dump later. The content, context, and multiple modes of representation they provide is highly effective and enjoyable!

If it wasn't for Study.com I would not have known exactly what it was that I needed to study. It most DEFINITELY was the reason I passed my three super challenging tests!

A Smarter Way To Study…

Create your account and get unlimited access to all lessons.

See for yourself why over 30 million people have used Study.com

Browse Course Directories

Browse all course directories by subject, education level, or goal. Our collection of online college classes for credit will help you find the course that's right for you. We offer online college courses with transferable credit on subjects like Biology, Business, Calculus, and more. Over 1,500 colleges and universities consider Study.com's college courses for transfer credit, so you can save time and money on your education.

Use Study.com's online high school courses to learn about Biology, English, Math, and more. These video courses created by academic experts will teach you key concepts in a fun and engaging way. Each video lesson breaks down ideas into manageable pieces that are easy to understand and remember. With on-demand flexibility, you can easily fit our online classes into your schedule and study when you have time. Whether you're learning these subjects for the first time or looking for a study guide to help improve your grade, these high school courses will help you succeed.

Study.com's collection of test prep courses will help you feel confident on test day and ace your exams. Our on-demand test prep courses cover a wide-range of exams. These include school entrance exams like the ACT, SAT, and GRE, and test prep courses for teacher certifications like PRAXIS, NES, and TExES. We also offer test prep classes for military placement exams, like the ASVAB. Whatever your test, we can help.

• Business Law
• Operations Management
• Business Ethics
• Information Technology
• Human Resources
• Computer Skills
• Business Intelligence
• Real Estate and Appraisal
• Communications
• See All Business Courses
• Precalculus
• Trigonometry
• College Math
• See All Math Courses
• American Government
• Political Science
• Criminal Justice
• Education & Teaching
• Anthropology
• See All Social Science Courses
• Earth Science
• Environment & Ecology
• Health and Nursing
• Physical Science
• See All Science Courses
• Art History
• Architecture
• See All Humanities Courses
• World History
• History of Western Civilization
• See All History Courses
• See All English Courses
• Programming
• Tech Skills
• See All Computer Science Courses
• General Psychology
• Abnormal Psychology
• Human Growth and Development
• Research Methods in Psychology
• Social Psychology
• Educational Psychology
• See All Psychology Courses
• ESL - English as a Second Language
• See All Foreign Language Courses
• Exercise and Fitness
• See All Lifestyle Courses
• General Education
• College Freshman
• College Sophomore
• College Junior
• College Senior
• See All College Courses
• High School Freshman
• High School Sophomore
• High School Junior
• High School Senior
• See All High School Courses
• See All Middle School Courses
• Kindergarten
• See All Elementary School Courses
• Online College Credit
• Credit by Exam
• Credit Recovery
• High School Equivalency
• See All Transferable Credit Courses
• ACT® and SAT® Prep
• Entrance Exams
• GRE, GMAT, LSAT and MCAT Prep
• State Exams for K-12 Students
• Skills Assessments
• Military Placement Exams
• College Placement Exams
• See All Test Prep Courses
• Certificates of Completion
• See All Certificates Courses
• Textbook Replacement
• Lesson Plans
• Course Syllabus
• Teacher Professional Development
• Tutoring Materials
• Curriculum Standards
• See All Teacher Resources Courses
• See All College Research Courses
• Textbook Help
• Practice Problems
• Practice Tests
• Homework Help
• Study Guide & Help
• See All Study Courses
• Teacher Certification
• Licensure Exam Prep
• CPA Certification
• MOS - Microsoft Office Specialist
• HRCI Continuing Education
• See All Professional Licensure Courses
• AP for Homeschool
• College Credit for Homeschool
• Core Homeschool Curriculum
• Homeschool Electives
• See All Homeschool Courses
• Corporate Learning
• Job Search & Guidance
• Career Training
• Continuing Education
• Career Qualifying Exams
• Career Development
• Career Aptitude Exams
• See All Career Courses

Featured course resources

• Forecast Definition Business
• Business Management Facts
• Supply Chain Management Overview
• Example of Ecommerce
• Define Project Management Software
• Memory Categories
• Components of Metabolism
• Different Trigonometric Identities
• Shapes From Circles
• Cognitive Psychology Concepts
• Types of Therapy
• Types of Mood Disorder
• What is Homeostasis?
• Kinds of Waves
• Circulatory System Organs
• Study Of Endocrine System
• Skeletal System Function

Explore our library of over 88,000 lessons

• Foreign Language
• Social Science
• Common Core
• High School
• College & Career Guidance Courses
• General Test Prep
• K-8 Courses
• Skills Courses
• Teacher Certification Exams
• See All Other Courses

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Available downloads, related records.

• Open access
• Published: 03 June 2024

Factors leading to lapses in professional behaviour of Gynae residents in Pakistan: a study reflecting through the lenses of patients and family, consultants and residents

• Humera Noreen 1 ,
• Rahila Yasmeen 2 &
• Shabana Ali Mohammad 2  

BMC Medical Education volume  24 , Article number:  611 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

115 Accesses

Metrics details

Introduction

Professional behaviour is the first manifestation of professionalism. In teaching hospitals, the residents can be considered vulnerable to lapses in professional behaviour when they fail to meet the set standards of professionalism. Residents of some specialties are more at risk of lapses in professional behaviour due to the demanding nature of work. Research focusing on the behaviour of residents in the field of Gynae and the underlying factors contributing to such behaviour is notably lacking in the literature. Additionally, there is a gap in understanding the perspectives of patients from Pakistan on this matter, as it remains unexplored thus far, which constitutes the central focus of this study.

An increase in complaints lodged against Gynae resident’s professional behaviour in Pakistan Citizen Portal (PCP) was observed. Therefore, an exploratory qualitative study was conducted to investigate the factors and rationales contributing to the lapses in resident’s professional behaviour.

The study collected the viewpoints of three stakeholder groups: patients and their families, consultants and residents. The study was conducted in three phases. First, the document analysis of written complaints was conducted, followed by face-to-face interviews (11 per group) conducted by trained researchers from an independent 3rd party. Finally, the interview data was transcribed, coded and analysed.

In total 15 themes were identified from the interviews with 3 stakeholders, which were then categorized and resulted in 6 overlapping themes. The most prevalent lapse reported by all 3 stakeholders was poor verbal behaviour of residents.

The highly ranked factors contributing to triggering the situation were associated with workplace challenges, well-being of residents, limited resources, patients and family characteristics, patients’ expectations, lack of administrative and paramedic support, cultural factors and challenges specific to Gynae specialty .

Another intriguing and emerging theme was related to the characteristics of patients and attendants which helped in understanding the causes and implications of conflicting environments. The value of competency also emphasized that can be accomplished by training and mentoring systems. The thorough examination of these factors by key stakeholders aided in accurately analysing the issue, its causes, and possible solutions. The study's findings will assist higher authorities in implementing corrective actions and offering evidence-based guidance to policymakers to improve healthcare system.

Peer Review reports

Understanding human behaviour is very important to comprehend how people see, interpret and adapt to various environments and to have an insight about the reasons people change their behaviour [ 1 ]. The same principle applies to professional behaviour (PB) in workplace environments including healthcare. The professional behaviour in a healthcare system could be defined as placing the best interests of patients at the center of everything you do [ 2 ].

Lapses in professional behaviour lack a unified definition, one could say that any behaviour that impairs the ability of the medical team to achieve desired outcomes is considered as lapse in PB or when someone is not following the standards expected from a person in their profession and behaving against them. Lapses could also be taken as a behaviour characterized by actions that a reasonable person would view as humiliating, rude, disrespectful, abusive language, demeaning, and bullying [ 3 ]. Lapses in professional conduct not only impact patient-doctor relationships, patient safety, and the quality of care but also the doctor's career [ 4 ].

According to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) guidelines, residents must acquire professional behaviour as a core competency. The expected domains of professional behaviour projected by the residents include empathy, honesty, and respect for others [ 5 ] . Residents are susceptible to engaging in a variety of lapses in professional behaviour throughout their residency, which is a crucial time for doctors to build their ethical norms. It is essential to have a complete awareness of the relevant causes or events in order to prevent resident misbehaviour [ 6 ].

There is a scarcity of literature specifically examining the assessment of trainees' reasons and varieties of professional conduct lapses [ 7 ]. In the existing body of literature, the behavioural deficiencies observed among residents encompass various misconduct aspects, including disruptive practices involving patient care neglect, absence of empathy, and disrespect toward patients, as well as verbal or nonverbal misuse of authority and unwelcoming demeanor [ 8 , 9 , 10 ].

However, it's been acknowledged that addressing lapses in professional behaviour poses one of the most difficult challenges for medical educators. Understanding the underlying reasons behind such lapses is intricate, with the context in which the behaviour manifests playing a pivotal role [ 7 ].

Research indicates a connection between unprofessional conduct during undergraduate and postgraduate training and similar behaviour in later practice [ 11 ]. A conceptual framework has been proposed for evaluating and addressing lapses in PB [ 3 ]. To identify the root causes of PB lapses, it is crucial to determine whether residents understand professional expectations and are willing to adhere to them, or if there are barriers or distractions hindering their ability to exhibit professional behaviour [ 12 ]. The problem of lapses in PB is not specific to any specialty and appears to be occurring in various demographic groups/countries [ 13 , 14 , 15 ].

In teaching hospitals tasked with training new physicians, the diverse background of patients and their attendants often leads to an overwhelming environment. This diversity breeds a behavioural gap, primarily driven by the varying interests of individuals involved. Patients and their attendants bring different levels of understanding, influenced by educational exposure, personal values, and background, which can disrupt interactions and impact patient-doctor relationships [ 16 ].

Furthermore, residents face additional pressures that contribute to their susceptibility to unprofessional behaviour. The urgency to quickly acquire clinical knowledge during their residency often supersedes their focus on professional conduct, leading to a lack of understanding in this regard [ 17 , 18 ]. Additionally, residents may feel compelled to remain silent about professional challenges they encounter during their training to uphold the hospital's public image [ 14 ]. Therefore, it becomes a difficult task for medical tutors to unfold the truth and deal with it in the best interest of doctors and patients.

Several studies reported by developed countries have explored various facets of professionalism in alignment with their respective healthcare systems and policies [ 13 , 15 , 18 ]. However, it is crucial to recognise that the findings of these studies may not be directly applicable to developing countries without appropriate contextual adaptation.

As a developing country, Pakistan presents a unique set of factors that differ from those observed in developed nations, including government policies, patient awareness, medical practices, doctor workload, and cultural influences. Furthermore, there is a scarcity of data regarding patient perceptions of PB lapses, the underlying reasons for inappropriate resident behaviour, and the specific contextual factors within the local environment that influence resident conduct.

Research indicates that certain medical specialties, such as OB-GYN and Surgery, face increased risks of specific unprofessional behaviours due to their distinct stressors [ 14 ]. Therefore, it is suggested to conduct context-specific assessments to identify and mitigate these stressors effectively [ 19 ]. A narrative study conducted in King Edward, Lahore Pakistan aimed to explore conflicts in Obs and Gynae, revealing organizational, interpersonal, and individual conflicts [ 20 ]. Further investigation is required to understand the underlying factors and triggers of these conflicts. While various factors influencing professionalism in junior medical professionals have been identified, there is a notable gap in research focusing specifically on Gynae residents. A recent study has reported high rates of unprofessional behaviour among dismissed General Practice residents (90%), with a significant proportion displaying disrespect towards patients or staff (27%) [ 21 ]. Unprofessional behaviour among doctors is regulated by disciplinary bodies of respective country which have extensive effects on doctors health and career. A higher incidence of disciplinary actions noted in Obstetrics and Gynaecology [ 22 ]. Majeed et al. reported in the narrative review that issues related to poor ethical behaviour by trainees are usually presented as patient’s complaints. Disrespectful behaviour (worrisome communication, reluctant to talk, behavioural change affecting patients and family) was one of the most reported unprofessional behaviour in the narrative review [ 23 ].

The study's context revolves around a non-profit public sector medical university situated in Rawalpindi (population range of 1,000,000–5,000,000 inhabitants), Punjab, recognized by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan [ 24 ]. The medical university operates as a small-sized coeducational university (uniRank enrollment range: 3,000–3,999 students) with significant Obstetrics and Gynae patient workload across three allied hospitals [ 25 ]. Due to the overwhelming patient load and resource constraints, unresolved complaints and conflicts have arisen. To address this, Prime Minister's Performance Delivery Unit (PMDU) [ 26 ] initiated a national complaints and grievance redressal mechanism called Pakistan Citizen Portal (PCP) [ 27 ]. ( https://citizenportal.gov.pk/ ), aiming to provide citizens with a streamlined platform for resolving complaints efficiently. A substantial number of complaints were filed against Obs and Gynae residents, prompting the need to investigate the underlying reasons for such grievances. Existing literature highlights the importance of professional behaviour in residents, yet studies specifically targeting Gynae residents' conduct and the reasons behind lapses are lacking. Moreover, the perceptions of Pakistani patients, the primary stakeholders affected, remain unexplored, along with the comparative analysis of opinions among the three main stakeholders (patients, residents and consultants) to unveil the true circumstances surrounding the issue.

Study aims and research questions/objectives

⊳ Research questions

What are the lapses in professional behaviour of Gynae residents?

What are the factors and reasons leading to the lapses in professional behaviour of Gynae residents from the perspectives of patients and family, Gynae consultants and residents in Pakistani context?

⊳ Objectives

To determine the frequency of identified lapses in professional behaviour among the Gynae residents by analysing PCP complaints

To explore the factors and reasons leading to the lapses in professional behaviour of Gynae residents from the perspectives of patients & families, Gynae consultants and residents.

A comprehensive analysis was done which aided in accurately diagnosing the problem, identifying its root causes, and devising effective remedies. The findings of this study are considered key enablers for the higher authorities to implement corrective measures and offer evidence-based guidance to policymakers, thereby enhancing the overall healthcare system.

Study design

The conceptual framework of this study is illustrated in (Fig.  1 ) and represents an exploratory qualitative approach, commonly employed in education and social sciences research [ 28 ]. This qualitative study spanned a duration of 6 months, commencing from Dec 2021 till June 2022, and was conducted within two Obs and Gynae departments within the public healthcare sector in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

The Conceptual framework of our study. Note: OB1 (Objective 1), OB2 (Objective 2)

Two research methodologies were utilized: document analysis of PCP complaints to identify and confirm the frequency of lapses in professional behaviour among Gynae residents,

(Phase 1) , and in-depth interviews designed on the basis of findings of the document analysis (Phase 2) . The in-depth interviews, conducted with the written consent of the participants, aimed to delve deeper into the perspectives of various stakeholders regarding lapses in professional behaviour and their underlying causes, providing contextual meaning [ 29 ]. Document analysis inform the design of the interview schedule. The study was approved by the institutional review committee of Islamic International Medical College (Ref No Riphah/IIMC/IRC/22/2003; approval date: 27/01/2022).

Participants

The study population consisted of three groups.

• Patients and family
• Consultants

The recruitment of study participants employed purposive sampling, aiming to select individuals or groups highly knowledgeable or experienced in the phenomenon under investigation. Criteria included availability, willingness to participate, and the ability to articulate experiences and opinions effectively [ 30 ]. Participants were chosen from two public sector hospitals in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, comprising stable patients and family members with a minimum one-week hospital stay, residents with over six months of training in the Obs & Gynae department, and consultants engaged in residential calls alongside residents. To ensure the comfort and security of female patients during interviews, both the patient and her husband were included in the first group. Exclusions included patients with less than one-week hospital stay, those deemed unstable or unwilling to engage, newly inducted residents with less than six months of training, and senior medical officers not involved in residential calls. A total of 33 semi-structured interviews were conducted, 11 per group, to explore factors contributing to lapses in professional behaviour. Saturation was achieved by the 10th interview, with one additional interview conducted for confirmation.

Data collection

The data collection was done in a structured manner in two phases.

Phase 1: (The complaints data and document analysis)

In phase 1, complaints uploaded to the PCP portal were examined to address the first objective of this study. Access was granted to a nominated Deputy Medical Superintendent (DMS), who regularly logged in to the Citizen Portal website to review complaints. Specific complaints against residents involve prompt notification of the focal persons in the concerned department, who immediately addressed the issue by investigating the resident and their consultant. Following fact-gathering, complainants were invited for scheduled meetings to evaluate allegations and attempt resolution; unresolved complaints were escalated to higher authorities.

This study's initial step involved confirming the number of complaints against Gynae residents regarding their behaviour. Formal permission was obtained to access all complaints, facilitating the review to determine complaint frequency and comprehend complainants' messages for administrative authorities. Complaint phrases were consolidated into themes, supplemented by additional themes identified in the literature, laying the groundwork for designing a semi-structured interview questionnaire. Complaints lodged by patients and families were documented in Table 1 , highlighting lapses in professional behaviour as a primary concern.

Phase 2: (Interview data)

Interview structure.

In the second phase of data collection, in-depth interviews were conducted for two primary objectives. Firstly, to reconfirm the nature of complaints against Gynae residents, and secondly, to delve deeper into the underlying issues from three distinct perspectives.

Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were chosen as the research instrument due to the sensitive nature of the topic. Three separate interview guides were developed for patients and their families, as well as residents and consultants, following the structure of the AMEE guide 87 [ 31 ].

Special attention was paid to ensuring that the language used in the interview guides was clear and understandable. The guide for patients was prepared in Urdu, while those for consultants and residents were in English. All interviews were conducted in Urdu to accommodate the participants' comfort in expressing their views and were later translated as needed.

Expert validation and pilot testing

The questionnaire used in the interview guide underwent expert validation by four Medical Educationists, who possessed a minimum of 5 years of experience. This validation aimed to assess the clarity and relevance of the questionnaire items in relation to the construct being measured. Feedback provided by the experts led to modifications in some items and adjustments in their sequence.

Following this, pilot testing was conducted, involving one participant from each stakeholder group. The results of the pilot interviews prompted further refinements in the interview guides and probes.

The interview guide consisted of two parts : the first part focused on gathering demographic information, while the second part addressed the study objectives. The demographic section collected details such as age, education, profession, duration of marriage, and family structure. Patients and their families were asked seven questions, while residents and consultants were presented with ten questions, aiming to capture information relevant to the research objectives.

Through this investigation, not only were the specific instances of lapses in professional behaviour among residents examined, but also the broader spectrum of issues that patients raised in their complaints.

Bias control

Considering the sensitivity of the study topic and the senior position of the researcher within the organizational hierarchy, third-party researchers were engaged to conduct the interviews. Each of the three stakeholder groups was interviewed separately. These face-to-face interviews were conducted following rigorous protocols to ensure accuracy and reliability. To mitigate social desirability bias [ 32 ], which could skew responses, the interviews were conducted by a separate team of psychologists who were not affiliated with the organization being studied. This team comprised three members, with each member assigned to interview one of the stakeholder groups, allowing them to develop a better rapport with respondents over time.

Logistics for the interviews were managed by a liaison person from the hospital, ensuring smooth coordination. Participants were provided with information sheets detailing the study aims, interview process, and assurances of data confidentiality and anonymity. The interviews were conducted in a designated space within the hospital premises and began after obtaining written informed consent from each participant. Audio recordings of the interviews were made, with an average duration of 45 min per session.

Challenges encountered during the interviews were addressed through daily online meetings, allowing the interviewers to discuss and overcome any issues faced. Patients and their families initially exhibited reluctance to participate, but counseling and assurances of confidentiality helped alleviate their concerns. For residents, anonymity was assured by assigning specific IDs and group codes to the transcribed interviews.

Each interview was transcribed verbatim and provided to the main researcher for analysis. Similar sets of questions were posed to all three stakeholder groups, aiming to elicit their perspectives on the factors influencing lapses in professional behaviour.

Phase 3: (Data analysis—theme extractions)

In phase 3, the framework method of thematic analysis was employed, known for its structured approach facilitating systematic comparison of data across cases [ 33 ]. This method involves several steps, as depicted in Fig.  2 .

Steps of framework method of thematic analysis

Firstly, the interview data was transcribed (Step 1), followed by familiarization with the transcriptions (Step 2). Initial codes were then generated to capture key concepts and ideas (Step 3), which were subsequently organized into themes, which aligned with the themes identified in the literature (Step 4). Additionally, new themes emerged during this process, enriching the analysis.

A working analytical framework was developed based on these themes (Step 5), and the final step involved interpreting the data within this framework to derive meaningful insights.

Quality and transparency

The study's expenses, which involved hiring third-party researchers, were solely supported by personal finances, without any contribution from public funds. Each researcher dedicated six days to conduct interviews with a total of 33 participants.

To ensure the quality of this study, several triangulation strategies were employed [ 34 ]. Credibility was enhanced through data triangulation by gathering information from three different stakeholder groups. Investigator triangulation involved the participation of multiple researchers, while method triangulation utilized both document analysis and semi-structured interviews.

To establish trustworthiness , transcripts were reviewed by additional researchers, and consultations were held with peers, study supervisors, and co-supervisors throughout the data processing stages. Thick descriptions were provided to elucidate behaviours, experiences, and contextual factors, increasing the study's transferability while acknowledging potential contextual differences.

The study's methodology was transparent, with each research step meticulously described from inception to reporting, ensuring dependability . Detailed records were maintained throughout the study, contributing to the transparency and reliability of the findings.

Team reflexivity

Semi-structured interview guide prepared by HN, main researcher and Gynaecologist by profession. Reviewed by RY, who is Dean of medical education department. Interviews were conducted and transcribed by US, AT and BM who are psychologists. Thematic analysis done by HN (Gynaecologist) and AG (who is also psychologist). Results were reviewed by LE (medical educationist) and FS (PhD and trained in qualitative research). The reflexivity was ensured by critical self-reflection about oneself as researcher and making the position of the researcher and the participants clear. The methodology explained in detail.

The results are described in 2 parts . The 1st part is the complaint data from document analysis of complaints on Pakistan Citizen Portal (PCP). The 2nd part explains the findings from the interview data sets.

Part 1-Complaint data

Participant characteristics for document analysis.

All the complaints are anonymised and can't be tracked back—no demographic data available which lead us to re-verification of these complaints.

The literature shows that complaints provide an opportunity to understand the problems and the ways these can be resolved [ 27 ]. In PCP document, the range of complaints were diverse, 26% ( n  = 10/38) were against resident’s professional behaviour which is the core investigation of this study. The rest were related to lack of facilities, infrastructure, and lack of facilities for attendants and huge workload. (Table  1 ).

Part 2- Interview data

Participants characteristics for the interviews.

The following Table  2 shows the demographic of all 3 stakeholders.

Reinforcing evaluation of the identified themes in PCP Document

The first question of interview was asked to re confirm the identified themes in PCP document. This part of the investigation provides a wider perspective of all three stakeholders related to the frequently observed/faced complaints (Table  3 ). Interestingly, the poor verbal communication and behaviour has been listed at the top with the highest value which reinforces the importance of this study. Other issues highlighted were lack of attention and insufficient communication by doctor and the complaints related to labour room. Few of the complaints were against paramedical and lower staff (Table  4 ).

Complaints other than lapses of professional behaviour includes prolonged waiting time, poor infrastructure and limited resources. (Table  4 ).

The interviews provided the researcher with rich insights into the factors and associated reasons for lapses in professional behaviour. Detailed findings are presented in the form of extracted themes and sub-themes for each stakeholder along with associated reasons.

Grouped classification of themes

The analysis was initiated by employing thematic analysis framework, as described in section of data analysis to examine data from three distinct stakeholder groups. Just to clarify, in this context, the term "themes" refers to the factors that each stakeholder perceived as potential contributors to professional lapses. Total; 15 themes extracted on analysis of data from 3 stakeholders (Fig.  3 ).

Total themes, subthemes and codes extracted on analysis of data from 3 stakeholders

The identified themes and sub-themes from the perspectives of the three stakeholders revealed some commonalities. There are a total of six overlapping themes (these are the themes with common consensus and similar perspective). These are discussed in detail later in this section and presented in (Fig.  4 ), indicating the stakeholders with whom these themes overlap. These overlapping themes help in shedding the light on the issue from 3 different angels. A graphical representation of the overlapping themes is depicted as a mesh in Fig.  5 .

Six overlapping themes from 3 stakeholders

Mesh of overlapping themes (grouped classification of common themes)

In this section, we delve into the six overlapping themes, exploring the analysis results by comparing the perspectives of the three stakeholders. This comprehensive approach provides insights into each theme from various angles, shedding light on the factors influencing lapses in professional behaviour among residents. Additionally, notable quotes are incorporated to offer a vivid and relatable depiction of these findings, enhancing understanding and authenticity.

Theme 1: Personal

The first overlapping theme, depicted in Fig.  6 , illustrates the sub-themes and perspectives of stakeholders regarding this common theme. It showcases stakeholders' viewpoints on potential issues contributing to lapses, closely linked with their ‘personal needs and concerns’. These encompass family concerns, caring responsibilities, individual personality traits, basic human needs, quality of life considerations, competency levels, and overall well-being.

Presenting the reasons associated with the common theme ‘Personal’

For majority residents, balancing caring responsibilities for young children without sufficient family support poses a significant challenge, adding to the stress of professional obligations. Additionally, residents experience frustration and disappointment when they are unable to meet their child's or their own health-related needs adequately.

[Resident] "Family support is very big factor. For example, there is a female doctor and she has children, so if there is a problem at home, it obviously affects the doctor."ID_03

The residents interviewed expressed concerns about their heavy workload, which has adverse effects on their emotional and physical well-being. This indicates the importance for hospital management and administration to devise strategies to address the specific needs of residents and provide them with adequate support for their unavoidable personal responsibilities.

[Resident] “We have mother residents who have to breastfeed their babies and sometime they did not even get time to pump milk for their babies” ID_01

[Resident] “As a Gynae resident we cannot spend proper time with our family. We have 30 to 32 hours so whatever time we have in our house we have to sleep at that time. ID_09

Personal factors such as childcare and household responsibilities have also been emphasised by both patients and consultants as potential triggers for behavioural issues.

[Patient & Attendant] “doc is also human she has to perform all her professional duties along with home responsibilities of taking care of kids and home.” ID_10

[Consultant] "Some of our doctors are very good, counsel the patient properly, talk comfortably and some doctors are in a bad mood in the morning, they may have their own problems that affect them, so they get tired."ID_1.

Many females in Gynae face challenges in securing support from their in-laws and family to manage their households. When in-laws fail to understand the demands of the profession or are not present in the same city, and hiring domestic help is difficult and costly, these stressors can significantly affect their performance and attitude towards their professional responsibilities.

[C] “Doctors mostly have their own tension going on. They may already be suffering from some tension that is affecting them”ID_3

Well-being serves as a vital metric in fostering a positive workplace environment. In the context of this study, we focus on the well-being of residents tasked with serving in the healthcare sector, particularly in the demanding field of Gynae. Recognized as a central aspect across various themes within this study, well-being emerges as a shared concern among all stakeholders, potentially contributing to lapses in professional behaviour.

[C] “if the resident is not feeling well that will also influence her behaviour with patients “ID_5”

The interview findings have outlined several influential factors impacting residents' well-being, with the most prominent being the long working hours, stringent duty schedules, and sacrifices made regarding basic human needs.

[R] There should be any stress relieving activities or vacations for us to spend time with our family. ID_07

[P] Residents are human and they are working a lot so they can get tired by working so much.” ID_09

[R] You cannot take off because it is a big issue and because of that you cannot have mental break from this entire situation. ID_0

There is a pressing need for institutional-level interventions to address various associated factors and support the well-being of residents. This will create a more conducive working environment that positively influences professional behaviour.

[R] “"it’s on the institutional level, patient load and tough routine. We are here for almost thirty six hour; we do not get short breaks for lunch and sleep. We are not machines we are humans, even then we try to give our 100%" ID_04.

Competency is pivotal in managing workload and meeting patients' needs. Notably, patients have never complained about treatment, reflecting positively on professional competency of residents. However, deficiencies in counseling skills, multitasking, and handling conflicts are observed. Consultants discern differences in attitude between senior and junior residents, highlighting the need for tailored training to equip residents for diverse situations.

[Consultant] “Experienced resident will stay cool and calm, and she knows that how to deal with things or how to answer about issues”ID_5

The management should implement a mentoring scheme to train junior members, offering them opportunities to shadow their seniors. Analysis of interview data strongly suggests that the interpersonal theme is closely linked with competency, the demands of the Gynae specialty, and administrative/management factors.

Theme 2: Workplace challenges

This theme delves into workplace challenges as perceived by stakeholders, shedding light on potential factors contributing to lapses in professional behaviour, as shown in Fig.  7 . Sub-themes include interpersonal dynamics, environmental factors, managing multiple responsibilities, workload issues, the role of senior staff, challenges with untrained paramedical personnel, labor room dynamics, basic human needs, and insufficient support from colleagues and superiors.

Presenting ‘Workplace challenges’ as a common theme across stakeholders

Interpersonal challenges are frequently highlighted by both residents and consultants. Novice residents struggle with managing conflicts with patients, leading to a tense and stressful environment for all parties involved. This situation is compounded when there is inadequate support from fellow doctors and paramedical staff members.

[Consultant] “Residents and nursing staff did not have good interpersonal relationships and if residents not have nice behaviour with nursing staff they will not get that support from them “ID_6.

Furthermore, the absence of respectful collaboration from other related departments exacerbates the stress and disappointment experienced by residents, ultimately leading to personal frustration that can influence behavioural lapses.

[Resident] In Gynae department our personalities get suppress that even other departments do not respect us. ID_09

Consultants have stressed the importance of training for paramedical staff to offer timely and supportive assistance. They have highlighted the need for paramedical staff to be attentive and responsive, especially during critical emergency situations. Consultants noted that doctors often have to repeatedly request assistance from paramedical staff and may need to raise their voices to convey the urgency of following instructions during critical situations.

[C] “If your paramedical staff is not cooperative then obviously you will get stressed (the doctor not only has to deliver the baby but also send the attendants outside and shout for aya to help her) ID_4.

The physical environment and its related factors significantly impact the satisfaction levels of staff members. Analysis of the data has identified the "environmental factor" as a common theme from both resident and patient/family interviews, as depicted in Fig.  7 . The findings indicate that patients and their attendants recognize the workload of doctors and acknowledge that excessive burden is a primary cause of stress for residents, ultimately affecting their behaviour and well-being.

[P] Duty hours should be reduced and they should get some time for rest and food. There is lot of pressure on them. They start their round at 9am and finish at 2pm because there are 3, 3 patients on each bed. ID_5.

[P] If there are 2 patients on one bed than this will increase anxiety of doc as well. Too many patients are talking simultaneously so this will make her angry. ID_07

[P] On operation day doc is more stressed because she has to manage all the patients and she is alone and feels pressured.” ID_02

The patients have also expressed concern that working hours should be reduced, or the management should consider increasing human resources to cope with the workload. This highlights the interconnection of this theme with other relevant themes.

[P] We should increase the number of doc. The doctor only gets angry when she gets tired and loses her patience level.” ID_07

[P] Patients are coming to doc after 2pm and then they expect their doc to make file but they don’t understand that doc have many other responsibilities.” ID_02

Similarly, from the residents' perspective, it is evident that they are struggling with their workload, and inappropriate physical surroundings further exacerbate their frustrations. Additionally, residents have expressed concerns about issues related to management and counseling of attendants, which adds to their responsibilities. This aligns with the theme discussing various characteristics of attendants, considered significant in creating a conflicting environment.

[R] Unsatisfactory work conditions and patient doctor ratio are among few highlighted by the residents. This can greatly influence the working conditions in support of appropriate environmental factors. A large number of attendants can cause additional management and communication burden for residents to deal with. ID_6.

[R] “Every patient is accompanied by 2 to 3 attendants and you are dealing with patient so every attendant individually comes to us and ask you about the information”. ID_09

Workload emerged as a prevalent theme in both residents' and consultants' data as shown in Fig.  7 . It is consistently highlighted as a significant issue by both groups in their interviews. Patients and their attendants also expressed concerns about the high workload on doctors. Excessive workload is considered one of the most influential factors contributing to observed lapses in professional behaviour.

[R] “doctors get exhaust because of long 36 h duty, at times we did not eat anything or we could not have proper sleep” ID_01

[R] We are not allowed to refuse any referral even if we do they come back again with the reference of DMS. ID_02 "The biggest problem in this is that we are working in the government sector and there is a human capacity of a doctor, if a doctor has a capacity to check of 5 to 6 patients, but in the government sector, a doctor has to check 20 patients. So the doctor feels overburdened." ID_03.

[R] We have one doctor who is deal 130 to 140 patients from 8 to 2 AM. ID_09 “in other countries they have better working conditions and increase number of doctors because of that they have less work load” ID_09.

The findings discussed above highlight a strong association between the environmental factor and well-being, as well as unmet human needs.

There are labor room-related issues highlighted by residents, which can escalate misunderstandings for patients' attendants. Cultural norms often dictate that only female family members accompany the patient during the delivery process. Men are typically not permitted to enter the labor room, especially when female attendants are present or when maintaining the privacy of other patients is a concern. However, this practice can be perceived negatively by patients' male attendants, although it may not reflect the true intent in all cases.

[R] Patients want to have their husbands with them in labour room and in our culture it is not possible. ID_05

[R] “Not allowing male attendants in labor make them think that their patient is in danger”. ID_07

The two overlapping themes identified from residents and consultant data are 'Lack of support from seniors' and 'Role of seniors' , respectively as shown in Fig.  7 . Junior residents have raised concerns regarding the lack of support from senior members. Similarly, consultants have echoed these sentiments, suggesting that seniors are not fulfilling their roles in providing adequate support to junior residents.

[R] " Seniors also pressurize us; they say that you are not examining patients properly or too slowly, because of their responsibility of finishing OPD in given time”. ID_06

Both residents and consultants have emphasized that residents are burdened with multiple tasks , some of which consume significant additional time as shown in Fig.  7 . For instance, residents often find themselves tasked with arranging blood for seriously ill patients by making excessive calls to relevant blood banks and maintaining patient records. Consequently, they struggle to allocate sufficient time to meet every patient's expectations.

[R] “Residents are always concerned about the patients and they tried to arrange things as soon as they can”. ID_09

[C] “doctor has to be a multitasker, for example if we are short on medicine or blood we send our PGT(post graduate trainee) to blood bank in the middle of the night”ID_1

The findings indicate a lack of support from management in sharing additional responsibilities, while simultaneously expecting doctors to multitask . This theme is closely linked to the 'workload' and 'Demand of Gynae specialty' , contributing to a stressful and demanding environment for residents. Another recurring theme identified from resident and consultant data is the 'Unfulfilled basic human needs' . Patients and their attendants have also noted the exhausting routines of residents, who often lack time for relaxation or sleep.

[P] “They are human and they are working a lot so they can get tired by working so much” ID_9

[P] “These doctors are so busy with patients that they don’t have time for self” ID_4

Residents have highlighted long duty hours as a significant factor, leaving them with insufficient time and energy to spend quality time with their families. These extended shifts often involve an excessive workload of patients, leading residents to compromise even on their meal times.

[R] “Because of long duty hours and huge number of patients we do not have time to get proper sleep” ID_01

[R] As a Gynae resident we cannot spend proper time with our family we have 30 to 32 h so whatever time we have in our house we have to sleep at that time. ID_09

Theme 3: Stressful specialty

This theme, prominently observed in the data collected from both residents and consultants as depicted in Fig.  8 , encompasses the sub-themes of 'demand of Gynae specialty', 'nature of profession', and 'unpredictable outcomes related to this profession'. Notably, patients' data only minimally reflects this theme, with only one in 11 patients commenting on the stressful nature of the profession.

Presenting ‘Stressful specialty’ as a common theme from two stakeholders

Both consultants and residents commonly perceive Gynae as the most stressful domain within the healthcare system, largely due to the simultaneous involvement in the lives of more than one individual. Consequently, this stress may manifest in various ways, potentially leading to lapses in professional behaviour or misinterpretations thereof. The data highlights several specific reasons inherent to the Gynae field, contributing to an overwhelming environment for residents, which can at times be challenging to navigate smoothly.

The unpredictable outcomes associated with Gynae further compound its demanding and challenging nature for those serving within this discipline.

[C] “We have to take care of two lives which is an additional stress for us “ID_6

[R] Residents have high level of tension when patients are non-cooperative, because we have to bear stress of both mother and fetus. ID_07

The interviewed residents have expressed the considerable stress they experience while working in a Gynae department with limited facilities. They highlighted the extra efforts required to arrange supporting resources, such as blood for seriously ill patients. Additionally, residents face the added stress of justifying their efforts and treatments in the unfortunate event of a patient casualty.

[R] “We are aware of our facilities and we have this pressure that even if we examine these excessive number of patients it would be difficult for us to manage them with compromised services, and later we have to justify if the patient expires”. ID_02.

[R] “In our department, our senior PGT herself rushes for the blood of serious patients”. ID_09

The field of Gynae presents unique challenges that are distinct from other areas of the healthcare system. The labor room environment, in particular, poses significant challenges for residents, especially when decisions and treatments are critical to more than one life. Dealing with patients with diverse needs requires patience and experience, as their behaviour can vary greatly during labor, depending on factors such as physical capability, pain tolerance, and cooperation.

Unfavorable workplace conditions can exacerbate the already demanding nature of the work, increasing the likelihood of professional lapses. However, organizational and management interventions can help mitigate these challenges. Improving workplace conditions, adjusting working hours, prioritizing resident well-being, and providing appropriate training are measures that can assist residents in handling such situations more effectively.

Multitasking, another significant challenge, should be minimized by involving support staff and experts at the right time. Residents should not bear sole responsibility for negative outcomes; trained staff should be available to assist them through challenging situations.

Overall, the discussion highlights the interconnectedness of various themes and sub-themes, highlighting the importance of organizational and management decisions in addressing workplace challenges and promoting resident well-being to reduce the occurrence of professional lapses.

Theme 4: Cultural

This theme is consistently identified across all three stakeholders, although residents and patients & families place greater emphasis on associated concerns, as depicted in Fig.  9 . Notably, the top concerns contributing to lapses in professional behaviour and poor understanding of cultural concerns and communication are highlighted.

Presenting sub-themes for ‘Cultural differences’ as a common theme across stakeholders’ data

Cultural differences can create a discriminatory environment across various aspects, while a lack of understanding of diverse needs can lead to significant misunderstandings between patients and residents. Language barriers, in particular, emerge as a critical cultural factor identified by all stakeholders. Communicating with individuals with different language needs, especially when they adhere to distinctive cultural norms, poses considerable challenges. Consultants also raised this issue during their interviews, although it is merged with 'Patients' characteristics' as a matter of importance.

[C] “Language barrier is a big problem. We also have Pathan (Pakhtoon) population who do not understand”ID-1

[R] “Most of the time Pakhtoon community is very difficult to deal. They do not take your opinion even if they are high risk patients, they force for normal delivery”ID_02

[P] “Doctor in labour room are harsh. they move Pathan attendant out of the labour room and say that we will call you when needed but they don’t call anyone anytime” ID_08

In developed countries, the healthcare system is well-equipped with chaperones who assist healthcare professionals in communicating important information to patients and their attendants. However, in Pakistan, such a system is not in place, making it difficult to expect residents to understand a variety of regional languages. This lack of linguistic diversity among residents can exacerbate feelings of being 'left out' among many patients and their attendants, sometimes leading to arguments with residents.

[R] “We have language barrier with Pakhtoon patients and they are mostly aggressive and thought that we do not understand their issues”. 1D_01

[P] “Nobody allow us in ward if we have to discuss something with doc. Our patient is not educated; she can’t explain her concern in Urdu so how will the treatment proceed.” ID_4

[R] “Most of the Pakhtoon community thought that we are biased and most of the time when they are going back they often say that “we are Pathan that’s why you are not paying attention to us” ID_07.

Furthermore, the language barrier or poor understanding of cultural and regional norms can create a biased environment or negatively influence the thoughts of minorities. This theme is reasonably associated with residents' characteristics and management factors. We believe that the administration should carefully address these important issues and consider providing chaperones to assist residents and patients.

Another challenge for residents arises when dealing with patients whose rigid cultural beliefs influence their mindset. Sometimes, residents must follow recommended treatments to save patients' lives, but attendants may challenge these treatments, leading to conflicting arguments.

Residents also encounter situations where they must take actions to ensure privacy for other patients, especially when multiple patients share a room. However, these actions can be misinterpreted and biased against certain communities. While this issue is partly related to patients' and families' understanding of privacy concerns, it is also the responsibility of the administration and supporting staff to educate them about these sensitive aspects. This burden should not solely fall on residents.

Theme 5: Patients’ characteristics

This theme stands out as one of the most discussed, offering rich information about the specific characteristics of patients and their attendants seeking Gynae treatment, as depicted in Fig.  10 . It delves into associated factors attributed to the educational, economic, and cultural backgrounds of patients and their attendants, which significantly influence their  behaviour and expectations. Additionally, it addresses contextual causes that may lead to lapses in professional behaviour.

Presenting sub-themes for ‘Patient characteristics’ as a common theme across stakeholders’ data

Pakistan, a developing country, with a literacy rate of 50% and a current birth rate of 3.6 per patient according to PDH 2018 survey, it is a common cultural practice to send senior female members to assist pregnant mothers. This practice is rooted in the belief that experienced females can provide valuable support to new mothers, which is often true. However, it's important not to overlook the fact that patients' attendants are typically the ones who maintain constant contact with residents and serve as the primary point of contact for treatment and critical decisions.

In order to ensure smooth provision of care, it is essential for attendants to cooperate with residents and be capable of interpreting important decisions and communicating needs from both ends. Patients and attendants with lower educational backgrounds often find it challenging to interpret complex information or navigate to the correct physical location when seeking assistance.

[R] “In government sectors literacy rate of patients are low which creates issue” ID_05

Lack of understanding about the sensitivity of the issue and unrealistic expectations from residents are frequent reasons that initiate arguments from patients and their attendants. For instance, they may argue if a resident is giving attention to a patient they don't consider to be serious. This behaviour is often perceived as neglectful by patients and attendants, though it may not accurately reflect the resident's intentions.

[R] “suppose we have emergency and I am checking that patient first so all other patients will start shouting, they will not understand the emergency, being a doctor we know that we have to see the emergency patients first but every patient thinks that their problem is the biggest one” ID_01.

In some cases, the unprofessional behaviour exhibited by residents may be a response to disrespectful acts from patients or attendants . Residents have reported instances of disrespect from patients and attendants who fail to grasp the sensitivity of certain treatments and the necessary preliminary measures before administering them. Additionally, the time taken for preoperative preparations may be misinterpreted as a 'delay' in treatment by patients and their attendants.

[R] "The patient complains that the doctor told us that we will have an operation, why don't you operate, if something happens to our child, you will be responsible, patient says" main tumain dekh lounga"( I will see you). They threaten us and misbehave with us".ID_06.

Residents frequently encounter unrealistic expectations from patients and their families regarding infrastructure and facilities, despite these not being within the residents' purview. Patients and their families may expect residents to provide beds and medication, leading to disappointment when residents are unable to fulfill these needs. Arguments where residents are unjustly blamed are unlikely to be accepted by residents and can escalate into conflicts. However, residents and supporting staff should undergo training to effectively communicate any limitations to patients in a more acceptable and understandable manner.

[R] “"When a patient enters the hospital. She doesn't get a bed and medicine. So it is no longer the doctor's responsibility, but because the doctor is in front of them, they feel that the doctor is responsible for these things" ID_06.

It is crucial for residents to recognize the various needs and support required by patients and their families, irrespective of their educational or economic backgrounds. This necessitates appropriate assistance provided to residents from various aspects such as staff, administration, and management support.

Trust is a fundamental element of the patient-doctor relationship, yet it is another concern highlighted by interviewed residents. Patients and their attendants may not fully trust the treatment provided by doctors, possibly due to limited exposure to the healthcare system in rural areas, where self-trained people (called Dai) are preferred over experienced doctors.

[R]”Even if doctor is thinking positive about the patient, patients have this trust issue that might be this doctor will not do my operation properly, or she will make my delivery difficult.” ID_07.

[R] “Patients with low literacy rate go to Dai. ID_09 Daiyon ka jo counselling level ha wo itna acha hota ha k patient kharab kr k bhi bhai jdain to attendant kuch bhi nahi kahe gain unki nazar ma Dai is very good”(counseling skills of Dai are so convincing that even if the patient encountered the complication they thought that Dai is competent). ID_09.

Patients seeking care at public hospitals are often economically deprived individuals, burdened with family responsibilities. Many rely on daily earnings, and prolonged absence from work can lead to financial strain. Additionally, they may have caregiving responsibilities that necessitate a swift return home, prompting them to insist on expedited treatment. While these unavoidable circumstances add stress to the situation, appropriate counseling can help patients understand the importance of receiving necessary treatment and alleviate the impact of missing appointments or procedures.

[R] “Patients in Gynae wards are in hurry because they have their family responsibilities and they have small kids at home” ID_07

Both residents and consultants have shared their experiences of navigating conflicting environments , which can sometimes lead residents to adopt a harsh tone when communicating with patients and attendants. For instance, in urgent situations requiring aggressive treatment critical to a patient's life, sudden behavioural changes may occur to emphasize the importance of the treatment. This behaviour has a strong link to the attendants' level of understanding and literacy regarding the healthcare system, particularly in the context of Gynae treatment where 2 or more lives may be at risk simultaneously.

[R] “Residents become harsh when attendants or patients do not understand the situation, for example they do not arrange the blood so we have to tell them harshly about it” ID_02

Some senior consultants have provided visionary statements, noting a cultural shift in how the public interacts with medical practitioners. Consequently, there has been a recent increase in aggressive behaviour observed from patients and attendants.

[C] “In past patients and attendants were not so violent but now a days they are violent “ID_6

Privacy is a fundamental concern for individuals worldwide, and developed countries have stringent policies and regulations in place to safeguard individual rights. Any breach of these rights can understandably trigger anxiety and concern. Therefore, it is crucial to communicate with patients and attendants about actions that may lead to security breaches involving residents, in order to prevent unpleasant situations.

[C] “Now a days people used to make our videos “ID_6 “people were aware in past as well but now they have got easy access to the portal for complaints”ID_6

This theme is closely linked with the understanding of patients and attendants regarding the healthcare environment, rules, regulations, and treatment specifics that can potentially trigger professional behavioural issues. Management or administration can play a crucial role in providing upfront information to patients and attendants regarding important regulations related to the Gynae specialty.

Theme 6: Organisational & administrative

Organizational and administrative authorities are integral in developing effective policies to ensure the smooth operation of healthcare systems. In the context of this study, we believe that the hospital administration can significantly contribute to mitigating the issues discussed thus far. They can take the lead in informing policymakers to design policies relevant to the sensitivity of this field.

This theme presents the perspectives of both residents and consultants on organizational and administrative issues that can lead to conflicts and lapses in professional behaviour, as depicted in Fig.  11 . Sub-themes include the lack of support from administration and management issues.

Presenting sub-themes for ‘Organisational& administrative’ as a common theme across stakeholders’data

An important point to note is the understanding and expectations of patients regarding the provision of facilities and resources necessary for their treatment. During interviews, all patients and families expressed a lack of clarity regarding the roles of hospital administration and doctors.

Both consultants and residents have highlighted challenges including lack of support from administration, limited resources, and excessive workload . A high influx of patients can significantly impact working conditions and hinder the ability to provide maximum satisfaction to all patients.

[C] “We do not have anybody who controls the influx of patients outside the rooms or OPD “ID_6

[C] “Also there is the factor that the workload is very high, already you have many patients and doctors are less, sometimes the government does not give you enough resources to facilitate the patients.”ID_3.

[R] “We have two operation theaters and over there we have one anesthesiologist” ID_02

Administrative support is crucial in ensuring a secure and pleasant working environment for residents. One concern raised by consultants is the management of patient flow within the hospital. A system should be implemented to queue patients and prioritize them based on their order of arrival for check-ups.

[C] “doctor should be given security, they should be given support, one by one the patient should be sent to the doctor so that the resident also gets time to see the patient”ID_3

The doctor-to-patient ratio varies as per the workload and patient intake. A heavy workload can significantly impact the quality of patient care provided. Most importantly, it can adversely affect the well-being of residents, who are already vulnerable due to the high number of patients they must manage.

[R] “we have huge number of patients and ratio of doctors are much less” ID_01

[R] “we only have one guard for security and we have huge number of patients and every patient have 2 attendants along with her so there is almost 150 people in one room so obviously I will get aggressive”. ID_01.

All of the issues discussed above are likely to influence the professional behaviour of residents making them susceptible to react aggressively which is not a pleasant experience for patients and their family.

The findings from interviews involving three main stakeholders, shed light on potential triggers for unprofessional behaviour discussed in previous sections. The synthesis in the discussion session highlights the key insights gleaned from the interviews, emphasizing the importance of understanding and addressing the challenges faced by residents in their professional journey.

“Being a resident is not a crime” (ID_C7).

“Residency is just like War in battlefield” (ID_C7).

The quotes from the interviewed consultant underscore the struggles and efforts inherent in the professional life of residents, emphasizing the pivotal role of residency as a preparation for frontline healthcare responsibilities. As residents navigate hierarchical structures within hospitals, they confront diverse challenges and ethical dilemmas, often without adequate training or support. These circumstances can negatively impact their professional behaviour, contributing to a conflicting healthcare environment. It is imperative to comprehensively explore the realities faced by residents to understand and address inappropriate behaviour effectively.

Demographic inference

The demographic observations from the interviewed stakeholders provide valuable insights into personal issues and patient characteristics that may influence lapses in professional behaviour. For instance, all interviewed patients are housewives with a Matriculation education level, and 45% of them reside in a nuclear family system despite low socioeconomic backgrounds, contrary to societal norms. Consultants, despite higher education and financial independence, are bound to stay in joint families, likely due to the need for familial support in caring for their children amidst demanding work hours. Similarly, a majority of residents reside in a nuclear family system, possibly driven by being unmarried or already established in such living arrangements. These findings highlight a preference for joint family living among Gynae residents and consultants, largely driven by the need for support in childcare due to demanding and long work schedules. However, such living arrangements may also introduce additional stressors related to cultural expectations from family members, as discussed under the 'Personal factors' theme, where stakeholders reflected on their experiences and challenges regarding professional responsibilities and expectations from in-laws.

Role of competency and communication skills

The interview findings regarding personal factors also examined communication skills and patient expectations. Our study revealed that a lack of communication skills when dealing with challenging situations often led to conflicts. Therefore, we recommend enhancing competency in this area to avoid such situations. This finding aligns with the research by Alipour et al., which also underscores the importance of good communication skills in managing challenging patients [ 35 ].

Furthermore, our study found that patients expect physicians to prioritize their needs, respond respectfully to their inquiries and concerns, and uphold their dignity, particularly during sensitive procedures such as those in the delivery room. Patients also value empathy towards their health condition. Similar sentiments were echoed in patient complaints (PCPs), where lack of care or attention from doctors was highlighted. These findings are consistent with prior research emphasizing the importance of communication in maintaining good professional behaviour, with patients specifically emphasizing the significance of being listened to attentively and having medical information explained in understandable terms [ 17 ].

Indeed, previous studies have highlighted the impact of inappropriate practices on patients' satisfaction. For instance, practices like insufficient preparation before patient encounters and failure to provide accurate and relevant information have been associated with decreased patient satisfaction [ 36 , 37 ] Additionally, a common complaint in PCP is the lack of an appropriate number of doctors, which is closely linked to these issues. Addressing these concerns is essential for improving patient care and overall satisfaction levels within healthcare settings.

Contextual understanding and its influence

The study reveals context-specific challenges faced by residents, particularly concerning the involvement of in-laws during residency, a phenomenon unique to the cultural context of Pakistani society. Another pertinent issue is the scarcity of affordable housemaids or child-minders. Unlike many developed countries where joint family structures are less prevalent and childcare support is provided by organizations and governments, there are limited initiatives in Pakistan to offer such support. Developed countries have recognized the value of professional child-minders and after-school clubs, providing safe and reliable childcare services to working parents. Unfortunately, Pakistan lacks such reliable facilities, leaving working parents, including residents, with limited options for childcare. While there is a common perception that grandparents can provide adequate care, those without such support often experience stress and uncertainty regarding the safety and care of their children. These stressors are unavoidable for residents and can significantly impact their performance and attitude towards professional responsibilities.

Addressing these context-specific challenges is crucial for supporting residents and ensuring their well-being amidst the demands of their professional roles.

The interview data highlights residents' multitude of responsibilities , contributing to complaints about long working hours and patient burden, particularly unique to our healthcare system. Unrealistic demands placed on Gynae residents, extending beyond medical care, negatively affect their behaviour due to added burdens. Labour room issues arise from societal norms, with family members often leading to miscommunication between doctors and husbands outside the room. Public distrust in doctors and teaching hospitals, fueled by negative media portrayal, prompts family intervention and threatening behaviour in the labour room, forcing Gynae residents into defensive positions and hindering treatment decisions.

Workplace challenges and their impact

The second major complaint in the PCP document, lack of facilities, aligns well with interview data, which highlights various workplace challenges as possible causes of lapses in professional behaviour. These challenges encompass interpersonal, environmental, and workload-related factors, as well as issues with labor room conditions and support from seniors and paramedical staff.

Junior residents' difficulties in handling conflicts with patients are highlighted in our study, reflecting findings from another study in a Gyane department in Pakistan, emphasizing the need for training in interpersonal skills [ 20 ]. Additionally, our study emphasizes the negative impact of poor working conditions on residents, a finding consistent with previous research linking organizational and environmental factors to professional behaviour [ 38 ].

Excessive workload emerges as a significant factor contributing to observed lapses in professional behaviour, supported by complaints of a huge patient burden in the document analysis. Our results resonate with research from Iran, indicating that high workload and time constraints lead to declining empathy and unprofessional behaviour [ 39 ]. Moreover, a narrative review on physician behaviour underscores the role of increased workload in affecting doctor-patient communication and fostering aggressive behaviour [ 23 ]. Excessive working hours can also lead to unfulfilled basic human needs and burnout among physicians, as highlighted by stakeholders in our interviews.

Our study identifies workplace issues such as lack of staff support, leading to frustration among residents when instructions are not followed, resulting in perceived lapses in professional behaviour. Patient outbursts often stem from staff not meeting requirements, compounded by language barriers and patient illiteracy hindering communication about triage and treatment priorities. Junior residents' concerns about insufficient support from seniors underscore the importance of role modeling in professionalism, as emphasized by previous research highlighting the impact of role modeling on empathy and professional behaviour [ 38 ].

Distinctive stresses associated with this specialty

The study acknowledges existing literature linking high-pressure specialties like surgery and Obs and Gynae with violent behaviours due to unique stresses [ 14 ]. Gynae residents, consultants, and even patients and their families described the profession as inherently stressful and unpredictable. This study highlights how professional behaviour is influenced by the stress of managing the lives of both mother and baby. Additionally, factors such as a high influx of non-booked patients, complicated referrals, unrealistic patient expectations, limited resources, non-cooperative attendants, and unmet human needs contribute to the already stressful environment in our healthcare setup.

Cultural differences and their importance

In developed countries, the healthcare system provides chaperones to assist healthcare experts in communicating vital information to patients and attendants. However, in Pakistan, such a system is absent, making it difficult to expect residents to understand various regional languages like Pashtoo and Gilgiti. This language barrier can exacerbate feelings of exclusion among patients and attendants, leading to conflicts with residents. This finding underscores the complexity of professionalism as a social construct, emphasizing the need to consider context, geographic location, and culture when addressing lapses in professional behaviour [ 40 ].

Why it is important to consider patients characteristics

This study delves into the specific characteristics of patients and attendants, extracted from interviews and unique to this contextual study. Their educational, economic, and cultural backgrounds vary significantly, posing challenges for residents in their interactions. Patients typically have limited education and come from low socioeconomic backgrounds, with predetermined expectations and a sense of entitlement to care due to taxes paid. Accompanied by numerous attendants, they often hold fixed views about doctors' duties. This perception, evident in PCP complaints, contributes to conflicts with doctors, exacerbated by varying tolerance levels. Notably, literature lacks data on patients' perspectives regarding residents' professional behaviour. Remarkably, patients and families do not attribute lapses in professional behaviour to organizational/administrative issues but instead fault residents for perceived deficiencies in hospital facilities and medication availability, likely due to a lack of awareness about administrative roles—a finding specific to impoverished patients in public sector hospitals.

The patient holds a central role in the healthcare system and is a significant stakeholder whose perception of lapses in professional behaviour is explored in this study. This encompasses actions such as imposing additional financial burdens (e.g., recommending costly tests, requiring the purchase of operation accessories) and unnecessarily prolonging hospital stays. Particularly poignant is a patient's observation regarding class-based social discrimination among patients, where "the rich were preferred over the poor," highlighting disparities in access to facilities and guidance for attendants.

Role of organisational & administrative support

Organizational and administrative authorities are pivotal in providing effective hospital facilities, a theme emphasized by residents and consultants in this study. Issues such as limited infrastructure, uncooperative senior behaviour, absence of casual leaves, and inadequate salary packages relative to workload are identified as factors negatively influencing professional behaviour. This underscores the insufficient support provided by the administration, training systems, and external factors, which are perceived as more influential than personal factors. These findings align with other studies that highlight deficiencies in training hospital systems as contributing to lapses in professional conduct among residents [ 41 ]. Additionally, organizational deficits, such as inadequate facilities and poor security, along with a gap between administration and clinical departments, are identified as sources of conflicts [ 20 ]. Overall, these results support the notion that professionalism is situation-sensitive, and the training environment may contribute to the deprofessionalization of residents, as observed in literature [ 42 , 43 , 44 ].

Uniqueness and importance of this study

To the best of our knowledge, this study represents a pioneering effort in thoroughly evaluating the perspectives of patients, consultants, and residents regarding lapses in professional behaviour among Gynae residents in teaching hospitals in Pakistan. Existing literature underscores the significance of complaints in uncovering underlying issues and guiding solutions. Studies by Rogers et al. and Hoffmann et al. have highlighted the prevalence of complaints related to medical professional behaviour in various contexts [ 45 ]. Our research complements these studies by providing deeper insights from multiple perspectives. While professionalism is influenced by environmental and personal factors, literature lacks sufficient data on patients' expectations of doctors. Our study fills this gap by exploring Pakistani patients' perspectives on the factors contributing to lapses in professional behaviour among residents, thereby enriching understanding in this area. Additionally, our study integrates document analysis with interview data to provide a comprehensive analysis.

Contribution of the study

The paradigm shift in understanding professionalism lapses highlights the increasing importance of incorporating patients' perspectives. Our research offers valuable insights from key stakeholders, which can serve as a benchmark for addressing identified issues in healthcare. It emphasizes the need for training residents in professionalism, with educators leveraging the findings of patient complaints to inform their approach.

Traditionally, resident misbehaviour has been attributed to character flaws [ 46 , 47 ] but our study reframes this interpretation within the context of training systems and environments. This nuanced approach enables a deeper understanding of the phenomenon and opens avenues for incident prevention through educational and organizational interventions. While some findings may not be universally applicable, our approach to addressing trainee professional lapses holds implications for diverse educational settings.

The findings of our study disclose several perceptions as a possible influential cause of unprofessional behaviour of residents. Excessive workload, workplace challenges is the residents' most frequently mentioned contributing factors. Another interesting finding of this research is an emerging theme related to the characteristics of patients and attendants which has been attributed by both consultant and resident. These characteristics can be considered useful in understand the causes and implications of conflicting environment. Opinion from administration or higher authorities regarding issues faced by residents and patients offer insight for future work.

Implication for educational practice

This section highlights key lessons learned from the comprehensive interview datasets involving three stakeholders, accompanied by recommendations derived from the research.

Balancing professional commitments with family responsibilities is crucial, as it varies among individuals and can significantly impact professional behaviour.

Management's attention to residents' well-being is paramount, as an unsupportive working environment can negatively affect professional conduct.

Implementing a mentoring scheme for junior members, allowing them to shadow seniors, can enhance their ability to handle complex situations effectively.

Providing trained paramedical staff to assist residents can alleviate their workload, allowing them to focus on critical tasks and improve patient care.

Ensuring supportive working conditions, including physical environment and workload management, can enhance resident well-being and positively influence professional behaviour.

Recognizing the unique challenges of the Gynae specialty is essential for developing policies that support stakeholders in this field.

The specific characteristics of patients and families identified in this study underscore the need for further exploration of their beliefs, understanding, and expectations to address diverse cultural and social needs.

Addressing the specific needs of all stakeholders, including privacy, language comprehension, socio-economic factors, and personal well-being, can foster a harmonious environment and mitigate conflicts.

Strengths and methodological challenges

Major limitation rather challenge of my study was the difficulty in understanding the construct by patients and family. Although all are matriculation by education but they unable to comprehend that there are always some factors behind the some behaviour. It might be a reason of less rich data as compared to consultants and residents. Another limitation might be some element of social desirability bias in patients because we collected data from admitted patients. Although researchers were unbiased but there might be some fear that telling the truth might affect their treatment procedures or behaviour of resident in charge of their ward. Only 2 public sector hospitals were targeted which restrict the scope of the study. Moreover, almost all the participants were female except for 1 male resident (subject to availability) pose g ender-related limitation.

Implications for further research

The research on professionalism in healthcare departments in Pakistan has been limited, leaving several aspects unexplored regarding the reasons behind poor behaviour exhibited by both doctors and patients. A multicenter study involving Gynae departments across various public and private sectors in different cities of Pakistan would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the prevalence, risk factors, significance, and consequences of lapses in professional behaviour.

Future research should also consider including perspectives from paramedical staff, hospital administration, and senior consultants within the Gynae unit to gain a holistic view of the issue.

Given the limited presence of male residents in Gynae obstetrics training, reaching out to them for their perspectives and comparing them with female residents could provide valuable insights.

Additionally, further research focused on remedying the issues identified in this study would be beneficial for the medical education community in addressing professional behaviour concerns effectively.

Availability of data and materials

All datasets used and/or analysed during current study available from corresponding author on reasonable request.

Coffey S. The Cambridge international dictionary of English - Procter, P. APPLIED LINGUISTICS. 1996;17(3):383–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.3.383 .

Barnhoorn PC, Nierkens V, Mak-van der Vossen MC, Numans ME, van Mook WN, Kramer AW. Unprofessional behaviour of GP residents and its remediation: a qualitative study among supervisors and faculty. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22:1–1.

Article   Google Scholar  

Williams BW, Williams MV. Understanding and remediating lapses in professionalism: lessons from the island of last resort. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(2):317–24.

Barnhoorn PC, Houtlosser M, Ottenhoff-de Jonge MW, Essers GT, Numans ME, Kramer AW. A practical framework for remediating unprofessional behaviour and for developing professionalism competencies and a professional identity. Med Teach. 2019;41(3):303–8.

(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Common Program Requirements(Residency). https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/cprresidency_2022v3.pdf ).

Chang HJ, Lee YM, Lee YH, Kwon HJ. Causes of resident lapses in professional conduct during the training: a qualitative study on the perspectives of residents. Med Teach. 2017;39(3):278–84.

Fargen KM, Drolet BC, Philibert I. Unprofessional behaviours among tomorrow’s physicians: Review of the literature with a focus on risk factors, temporal trends, and future directions. Acad Med. 2016;91(6):858–64.

Nittur N, Kibble J. Current practices in assessing professionalism in United States and Canadian allopathic medical students and residents. Cureus. 2017;9(5):e1267.

Google Scholar  

Brotherton S, Kao A, Crigger BJ. Professing the values of medicine: the modernized AMA code of medical ethics. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1041–2.

Tricco AC, Rios P, Zarin W, Cardoso R, Diaz S, Nincic V, Mascarenhas A, Jassemi S, Straus SE. Prevention and management of unprofessional behaviour among adults in the workplace: a scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0201187.

Krupat E, Dienstag JL, Padrino SL, Mayer JE Jr, Shore MF, Young A, Chaudhry HJ, Pelletier SR, Reis BY. Do professionalism lapses in medical school predict problems in residency and clinical practice? Acad Med. 2020;95(6):888–95.

Seehusen DA. Understanding unprofessionalism in residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2020;12(3):243–6.

Lackritz K, Braverman A, Rana M, Gaspari B, Wolf A. Examining unprofessional behaviour in the OBGYN Clerkship: A Qualitative study of essays written by students. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;1(130):47S.

Roberts NK, Dorsey JK, Wold B. Unprofessional behaviour by specialty: A qualitative analysis of six years of student perceptions of medical school faculty. Med Teach. 2014;36(7):621–5.

Worly B. Professionalism education of OB/GYN resident physicians: What makes a difference?.

Rogers R, Drogin EY. Conducting Miranda evaluations: Applications of psychological expertise and science within the forensic context. Springer Nature; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13511-9 .

Bulk LY, Drynan D, Murphy S, Gerber P, Bezati R, Trivett S, Jarus T. Patient perspectives: four pillars of professionalism. Patient Exp J. 2019;6(3):74–81.

Chandratilake M, McAleer S, Gibson J, Roff S. Medical professionalism: what does the public think? Clin Med. 2010;10(4):364.

Mak-van der Vossen M, Teherani A, van Mook W, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. How to identify, address and report students’ unprofessional behaviour in medical school. Med Teach. 2020;42(4):372–9.

Waheed K, Al-Eraky M, Naeem NI, Ejaz S, Khanum A. A narrative study on work place based conflicts in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department. JPMA The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2021;71(2 (A)):514–7.

Godschalx-Dekker JA, Sijbom CA, Barnhoorn PC, van Mook WN. Unprofessional behaviour of GP residents leading to a dismissal dispute: characteristics and outcomes of those who appeal. BMC Primary Care. 2024;25(1):61.

Norman NB, Soo JM, Lam MY, Thirumoorthy T. Unprofessional behaviour of junior doctors: a retrospective analysis of outcomes by the Singapore medical council disciplinary tribunals. Singapore Med J. 2021;62(3):120.

Majeed N. A narrative review of the unprofessional behaviours of physicians at workplace. Health Prof Educ J. 2021;4(1):26–32.

Javed Y, Ahmad S, Khahro SH. Evaluating the research performance of Islamabad-based higher education institutes. SAGE Open. 2020J;10(1):2158244020902085.

University Overview of Rawalpindi Medical University on uniRank (Australian website) retrieved on 13 March 2024.

"PM Imran Khan launches 'Pakistan Citizen Portal'". www.thenews.com.pk . Retrieved 13.03.24.

Pakistan Citizens' Portal to redress public grievances and improve governance: PM Imran Khan". http://www.radio.gov.pk . Retrieved 13.03.24.

Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 4th Edition. Jossey-Bass; 2015. ISBN: 978-1-119-00361-8.

Caelli K, Ray L, Mill J. ‘Clear as mud’: toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2003;2(2):1–3.

Duan N, Bhaumik DK, Palinkas LA, Hoagwood K. Optimal design and purposeful sampling: complementary methodologies for implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2015;42:524–32.

Artino AR Jr, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Medical Teacher. 2014;36(6):463–74. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814 .

Latkin CA, Edwards C, Davey-Rothwell MA, Tobin KE. The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addict Behav. 2017;1(73):133–6.

Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:1–8.

Creswell JW. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. pearson; 2015.

Alipour F, Shahvari Z, Asghari F, Samadi S, Amini H. Personal factors affecting medical professionalism: a qualitative study in Iran. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020;13:3.

Bell BS, Kozlowski SW. A typology of virtual teams: implications for effective leadership. Group Org Manag. 2002;27(1):14–49.

Siu AL, Kravitz RL, Keeler E, Hemmerling K, Kington R, Davis JW, Mitchell A, Burton TM, Morgenstern H, Beers MH, Reuben DB. Postdischarge geriatric assessment of hospitalized frail elderly patients. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(1):76–81.

West CP, Shanafelt TD. The influence of personal and environmental factors on professionalism in medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2007D;7:1–9.

Yavari N, Asghari F, Shahvari Z, Nedjat S, Larijani B. Obstacles of professional behaviour among medical trainees: A qualitative study from Iran (2018). Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2019;8(1):193.

Fredrikson M, Jha S, Ristenpart T. Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. 2015. p. 1322–33.

Chang HJ, Lee YM, Lee YH, Kwon HJ. Investigation of unethical and unprofessional behaviour in Korean residency training. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):370–8.

Collier P, Hoeffler A. Aid, policy and peace: Reducing the risks of civil conflict. Defence and Peace Economics. 2002;13(6):435–50.

Coulehan J. Today’s professionalism: engaging the mind but not the heart. Acad Med. 2005;80(10):892–8.

Lopez L, Katz JT. Perspective: creating an ethical workplace: reverberations of resident work hours reform. Acad Med. 2009;84(3):315–9.

Hoffmann WA, Nortjé N. Patterns of unprofessional conduct by medical practitioners in South Africa (2007–2013). SAFP. 2016;58(3):108–13.

Levey RE. Sources of stress for residents and recommendations for programs to assist them. Acad Med. 2001;76(2):142–50.

Sanfey H, DaRosa DA, Hickson GB, Williams B, Sudan R, Boehler ML, Klingensmith ME, Klamen D, Mellinger JD, Hebert JC, Richard KM. Pursuing professional accountability: an evidence-based approach to addressing residents with behavioural problems. Arch Surg. 2012;147(7):642–7.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants for their involvement and time spent in the study. Special thanks to Dr Faiza Samreen for providing continuous support and guidance throughout the study. Authors would like to acknowledge the Professor Dr Luna Ejaz Kahloon (Dean of Department of Obs/Gynae Rawalpindi Medical University), and Dr Usman Hamdani (Global Institute of Human Development ) Zille e Huma, Ayella Gillani , Aabsha Tasawar, Bushra Mahjabeen, Ambreen Sadaf , MahNoor Urosa Safdar for their feedback and guidance.

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Obstetrics &Gynaecology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Humera Noreen

Department of Medical Education, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Rahila Yasmeen & Shabana Ali Mohammad

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

I Dr Humera Noreen as main author design the work, wrote the main Manuscript and prepared figures. Prof Dr Rahila Yasmeen and Dr Shabana Ali helped in interpretation and analysis of data. we all reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Humera Noreen .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

The study was approved by the institutional review committee of Islamic International Medical College (Ref No Riphah/IIMC/IRC/22/2003; approval date: 27/01/2022).

A written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all the participants.

The authors confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Noreen, H., Yasmeen, R. & Mohammad, S.A. Factors leading to lapses in professional behaviour of Gynae residents in Pakistan: a study reflecting through the lenses of patients and family, consultants and residents. BMC Med Educ 24 , 611 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05509-9

Download citation

Received : 12 July 2023

Accepted : 02 May 2024

Published : 03 June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05509-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Lapses in professional behaviour
• Professionalism
• Gynae residents
• Factors and reasons

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

• Submission enquiries: [email protected]
• General enquiries: [email protected]