management decision making case study

• +1 0234 56 7890
• [email protected]

Effective Decision-Making: A Case Study

Effective decision-making:, leading an organization through timely and impactful action.

Senior leaders at a top New England insurance provider need to develop the skills and behaviors for better, faster decision-making. This virtually delivered program spans four half-day sessions and includes individual assignments, facilitator-led presentations, and simulation decision-making. Over the past two months, this program touched over 100 leaders, providing them with actionable models and frameworks to use back on the job.

For one of New England’s most iconic insurers, senior leaders are challenged to make timely, effective decisions. These leaders face decisions on three levels: ones they translate to their teams, ones they make themselves, and ones they influence. But in a quickly changing, highly regulated market, risk aversion can lead to slow and ineffective decisions. How can senior leaders practice in a safe environment the quick, yet informed, decision-making necessary for the job while simultaneously learning new models and techniques — and without the learning experience burdening their precious time?

The Effective Decision-Making program was artfully designed to immerse senior leaders in 16 hours of hands-on experience, including reflection and feedback activities, applicable exercises, supporting content, and participation in a business simulation to practice the core content of the program. Participants work together in small groups to complete these activities within a limited time frame, replicating the work environment in which these leaders must succeed. Continuous reflection and group discussion around results create real-time learning for leaders. Application exercises then facilitate the simulation experience and their work back on the job. The program employs a variety of learning methodologies, including:

• Individual assignments that incorporate content and frameworks designed to develop effective decision-making skills.
• Guided reflection activities to encourage self-awareness and commitments for action.
• Large group conversations — live discussions focused on peer input around key learning points.
• Small group activities, including virtual role plays designed to build critical interpersonal and leadership skills.
• A dynamic business simulation in which participants are charged with translating, making, and influencing difficult decisions.
• Facilitator-led discussions and presentations.

Learning Objectives

Participants develop and improve skills to:

• Cultivate a leadership mindset that empowers, inspires, and challenges others.
• Translate decisions for stronger team alignment and performance.
• Make better decisions under pressure.
• Influence individuals across the organization.
• Better understand how one’s leadership actions impact business results

Design Highlights

Program agenda.

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the need for social distancing, this program was delivered virtually. However, this didn't preclude the need to give leaders an opportunity to connect with, and learn from, one another. In response to those needs, Insight Experience developed a fully remote, yet highly interactive, offering delivered over four half-day sessions.

Interactive Virtual Learning Format

Effective Decision-Making was designed to promote both individual and group activities and reflection. Participants access the program via a video-conferencing platform that allows them to work together both in large and small groups. Learning content and group discussions are done as one large group, enabling consistency in learning and opportunities to hear from all participants. The business simulation decision-making and reflection activities are conducted in small groups, allowing teams to develop deeper connections and conversations.

Simulation Overview

Participants assume the role of a General Manager for InfoMaster, a message management provider. Their leadership challenge as the GM is to translate the broader IIC organizational goals into strategy for their business, support that strategy though the development of organizational capabilities and product offerings, manage multiple divisions and stakeholders, and consider their contribution and responsibility to the broader organization of which they are a part. 

Success in the simulation is based on how well teams:

• Understand and translate organizational strategy into goals and plans for their business unit.
• Align organizational initiatives and product development with broader strategies.
• Develop employee capabilities required to execute strategic goals.
• Hold stakeholders accountable to commitments and results.
• Communicate with stakeholders and involve others in plans and decision-making.
• Develop their network and their influence within IIC to help support initiatives for the organization

History and Results

Effective Decision-Making was developed in 2020 as an experience for senior-level leaders. After a successful pilot, the program was then rolled out to two more cohorts in 2021 and 2022. The senior-level leaders who participated in the program then requested we offer the same program to their direct reports. After some small adjustments to make the program more appropriate for director-level leaders, the program was launched in 2022 for approximately 100 directors.

Here is what some participants have said about this program:

• “ One of the better programs we've done here at [our organization]. Pace was very quick but content was excellent and approach made it fun .”
• “ Loved the content and the flow. Very nicely organized and managed. Thank you! ”
• “ Really enjoyed the collaborative nature of the simulation.”
• “ It was wonderful and I felt it is a great opportunity. Learnt and reinforced leadership training and what it would take to be successful.”
• “One of the best I've experienced — especially appreciated how the reality of [our organization] was incorporated and it was with similarly situated peers.”
• “This program was great! It gave good insight into how to enhance my skills as leader by adopting the leadership mindset.”
• “Loved the fast pace, having a sim group that had various backgrounds in the company and seeing the results of our decisions at the corporate level.”
• “Great program — I love the concepts highlighted during these sessions.”

Looking for results like these?

Leave comment, recent posts.

Taking Top Salespeople to Top Sales Leadership: A Case Study

Practice Makes Permanent: Microlearning on the Go (a Case Study)

Transforming Leadership to Support Significant Change: A Case Study

Leadership Foundations for Individual Contributors: A Case Study

Connecting Category Management Decisions and Business Outcomes: A Case Study

Accelerate the Implementation of Manager Expectations: A Case Study

Developing Effective Global Leaders: A Case Study

Delivering Exceptional Internal Customer Service: A Case Study

Bringing Leadership Principles to Life: A Case Study

Navigating the Organization: A Case Study

• Browse All Articles
• Newsletter Sign-Up

DecisionMaking →

No results found in working knowledge.

• Were any results found in one of the other content buckets on the left?
• Try removing some search filters.
• Use different search filters.

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

What the Case Study Method Really Teaches

• Nitin Nohria

Seven meta-skills that stick even if the cases fade from memory.

It’s been 100 years since Harvard Business School began using the case study method. Beyond teaching specific subject matter, the case study method excels in instilling meta-skills in students. This article explains the importance of seven such skills: preparation, discernment, bias recognition, judgement, collaboration, curiosity, and self-confidence.

During my decade as dean of Harvard Business School, I spent hundreds of hours talking with our alumni. To enliven these conversations, I relied on a favorite question: “What was the most important thing you learned from your time in our MBA program?”

• Nitin Nohria is the George F. Baker Professor of Business Administration, Distinguished University Service Professor, and former dean of Harvard Business School.

Partner Center

• Case Studies

Case Study Basics

What is a case study *.

A case study is a snapshot of an organization or an industry wrestling with a dilemma, written to serve a set of pedagogical objectives. Whether raw or cooked , what distinguishes a pedagogical case study from other writing is that it centers on one or more dilemmas. Rather than take in information passively, a case study invites readers to engage the material in the case to solve the problems presented. Whatever the case structure, the best classroom cases all have these attributes: (1)The case discusses issues that allow for a number of different courses of action – the issues discussed are not “no-brainers,” (2) the case makes the management issues as compelling as possible by providing rich background and detail, and (3) the case invites the creative use of analytical management tools.

Case studies are immensely useful as teaching tools and sources of research ideas. They build a reservoir of subject knowledge and help students develop analytical skills. For the faculty, cases provide unparalleled insights into the continually evolving world of management and may inspire further theoretical inquiry.

There are many case formats. A traditional case study presents a management issue or issues calling for resolution and action. It generally breaks off at a decision point with the manager weighing a number of different options. It puts the student in the decision-maker’s shoes and allows the student to understand the stakes involved. In other instances, a case study is more of a forensic exercise. The operations and history of a company or an industry will be presented without reference to a specific dilemma. The instructor will then ask students to comment on how the organization operates, to look for the key success factors, critical relationships, and underlying sources of value. A written case will pre-package appropriate material for students, while an online case may provide a wider variety of topics in a less linear manner.

Choosing Participants for a Case Study

Many organizations cooperate in case studies out of a desire to contribute to management education. They understand the need for management school professors and students to keep current with practice.

Organizations also cooperate in order to gain exposure in management school classrooms. The increased visibility and knowledge about an organization’s operations and culture can lead to subsidiary benefits such as improved recruiting.

Finally, organizations participate because reading a case about their operations and decision making written by a neutral observer can generate useful insights. A case study preserves a moment in time and chronicles an otherwise hidden history. Managers who visit the classroom to view the case discussion generally find the experience invigorating.

The Final Product

Cases are usually written as narratives that take the reader through the events leading to the decision point, including relevant information on the historical, competitive, legal, technical, and political environment facing the organization. A written case study generally runs from 5,000 to 10,000 words of text supplemented with numerous pages of data exhibits. An online raw case may have less original text, but will require students to extract information from multiple original documents, videos of company leaders discussing the challenges, photographs, and links to articles and websites.

The first time a case is taught represents something of a test run. As students react to the material, plan to revise the case to include additional information or to delete data that does not appear useful. If the organization’s managers attend the class, their responses to student comments and questions may suggest some case revisions as well.

The sponsoring professor will generally write a “teaching note” to give other instructors advice on how to structure classroom discussion and useful bits of analysis that can be included to explicate the issues highlighted in the case study.

Finally, one case may inspire another. Either during the case writing process or after a case is done, a second “B” case might be useful to write that outlines what the organization did or that outlines new challenges faced by the organization after the timeframe of the initial case study.

* Portions of this note are adapted from E. Raymond Corey, “Writing Cases and Teaching Notes,” Harvard Business School case 399-077, with updates to reflect Yale School of Management practices for traditional and raw cases.

Smart. Open. Grounded. Inventive. Read our Ideas Made to Matter.

Which program is right for you?

Through intellectual rigor and experiential learning, this full-time, two-year MBA program develops leaders who make a difference in the world.

A rigorous, hands-on program that prepares adaptive problem solvers for premier finance careers.

A 12-month program focused on applying the tools of modern data science, optimization and machine learning to solve real-world business problems.

Earn your MBA and SM in engineering with this transformative two-year program.

Combine an international MBA with a deep dive into management science. A special opportunity for partner and affiliate schools only.

A doctoral program that produces outstanding scholars who are leading in their fields of research.

Bring a business perspective to your technical and quantitative expertise with a bachelor’s degree in management, business analytics, or finance.

A joint program for mid-career professionals that integrates engineering and systems thinking. Earn your master’s degree in engineering and management.

An interdisciplinary program that combines engineering, management, and design, leading to a master’s degree in engineering and management.

Executive Programs

A full-time MBA program for mid-career leaders eager to dedicate one year of discovery for a lifetime of impact.

This 20-month MBA program equips experienced executives to enhance their impact on their organizations and the world.

Non-degree programs for senior executives and high-potential managers.

A non-degree, customizable program for mid-career professionals.

Teaching Resources Library

Case studies.

The teaching business case studies available here are narratives that facilitate class discussion about a particular business or management issue. Teaching cases are meant to spur debate among students rather than promote a particular point of view or steer students in a specific direction.  Some of the case studies in this collection highlight the decision-making process in a business or management setting. Other cases are descriptive or demonstrative in nature, showcasing something that has happened or is happening in a particular business or management environment. Whether decision-based or demonstrative, case studies give students the chance to be in the shoes of a protagonist. With the help of context and detailed data, students can analyze what they would and would not do in a particular situation, why, and how.

Case Studies By Category

• Business Essentials
• Leadership & Management
• Credential of Leadership, Impact, and Management in Business (CLIMB)
• Entrepreneurship & Innovation
• Digital Transformation
• Finance & Accounting
• Business in Society
• For Organizations
• Support Portal
• Media Coverage
• Founding Donors
• Leadership Team

• Harvard Business School →
• HBS Online →
• Business Insights →

Business Insights

Harvard Business School Online's Business Insights Blog provides the career insights you need to achieve your goals and gain confidence in your business skills.

• Career Development
• Communication
• Decision-Making
• Earning Your MBA
• Negotiation
• News & Events
• Productivity
• Staff Spotlight
• Student Profiles
• Work-Life Balance
• AI Essentials for Business
• Alternative Investments
• Business Analytics
• Business Strategy
• Business and Climate Change
• Design Thinking and Innovation
• Digital Marketing Strategy
• Disruptive Strategy
• Economics for Managers
• Entrepreneurship Essentials
• Financial Accounting
• Global Business
• Launching Tech Ventures
• Leadership Principles
• Leadership, Ethics, and Corporate Accountability
• Leading with Finance
• Management Essentials
• Negotiation Mastery
• Organizational Leadership
• Power and Influence for Positive Impact
• Strategy Execution
• Sustainable Business Strategy
• Sustainable Investing
• Winning with Digital Platforms

5 Key Decision-Making Techniques for Managers

• 31 Mar 2020

Decision-making is an essential business skill that drives organizational performance. A survey of more than 750 companies by management consulting firm Bain found a 95 percent correlation between decision-making effectiveness and financial results. The data also showed companies that excel at making and executing strategic decisions generate returns nearly six percent higher than those of their competitors.

At many organizations, it’s up to managers to make the key decisions that influence business strategy. Research by consulting firm McKinsey , however, shows that 61 percent of them believe at least half the time they spend doing so is ineffective.

If you want to avoid falling into this demographic, here are five decision-making techniques you can employ to improve your management skills and help your organization succeed.

Access your free e-book today.

Decision-Making Techniques for Managers

1. take a process-oriented approach.

One of your primary responsibilities as a manager is to get things done with and through others, which involves leveraging organizational processes to accomplish goals and produce results. According to Harvard Business School Professor Len Schlesinger, who’s featured in the online course Management Essentials , decision-making is one of the processes you can use to your advantage.

“The majority of people think about making decisions as an event,” Schlesinger says. “It’s very rare to find a single point in time where a ‘decision of significance’ is made and things go forward from there. What we’re really talking about is a process. The role of the manager in overseeing that process is straightforward, yet, at the same time, extraordinarily complex.”

When establishing your decision-making process , first frame the issue at hand to ensure you ask the right questions and everyone agrees on what needs to be decided. From there, build your team and manage group dynamics to analyze the problem and craft a viable solution. By following a structured, multi-step process, you can make informed decisions and achieve the desired outcome.

2. Involve Your Team in the Process

Decision-making doesn’t have to be done in a vacuum. To avoid relying on managerial decisions alone, involve your team in the process to bring multiple viewpoints into the conversation and stimulate creative problem-solving .

Research in the journal Royal Society Open Science shows team decision-making is highly effective because it pools individuals’ collective knowledge and experience, leading to more innovative solutions and helping to surface and overcome hidden biases among groups.

Considering others’ perspectives on how to approach and surmount a specific challenge is an ideal alternative because it helps you become more aware of your implicit biases and manage your team with greater emotional intelligence .

Related: Emotional Intelligence Skills: What They Are & How to Develop Them

3. Foster a Collaborative Mindset

Fostering the right mindset early in the decision-making process is critical to ensuring your team works collaboratively—not contentiously.

When facing a decision, there are two key mindsets to consider:

• Advocacy: A mindset that regards decision-making as a contest. In a group with an advocacy mindset, individuals try to persuade others, defend their positions, and downplay their weaknesses.
• Inquiry: A mindset that navigates decision-making with collaborative problem-solving. An inquiry mindset centers on individuals testing and evaluating assumptions by presenting balanced arguments, considering alternatives, and being open to constructive criticism.

“On the surface, advocacy and inquiry approaches look deceptively similar,” HBS Professor David Garvin says in Management Essentials . “Both involve individuals engaged in debates, drawing on data, developing alternatives, and deciding on future directions. But, despite these similarities, inquiry and advocacy produce very different results.”

A study by software company Cloverpop found that decisions made and executed by diverse teams deliver 60 percent better results. Strive to instill your team members with an inquiry mindset so they’re empowered to think critically and feel their perspectives are welcomed and valued rather than discouraged and dismissed.

4. Create and Uphold Psychological Safety

For your team members to feel comfortable sharing their diverse perspectives and working collaboratively, it’s crucial to create and maintain a psychologically safe environment. According to research by technology company Google , psychological safety is the most important dynamic found among high-performing teams.

“Psychological safety is essential—first and foremost—for getting the information and perspectives out,” HBS Professor Amy Edmondson says in Management Essentials . “It’s helpful to be able to talk about what we know and think in an effective and thoughtful way before coming to a final conclusion.”

To help your team feel psychologically safe, be respectful and give fair consideration when listening to everyone’s opinions. When voicing your own point of view, be open and transparent, and adapt your communication style to meet the group’s needs. By actively listening and being attuned to your colleagues’ emotions and attitudes, you can forge a stronger bond of trust, make them feel more engaged and foster an environment that allows for more effective decisions.

Related: 5 Tips for Managing Change in the Workplace

5. Reiterate the Goals and Purpose of the Decision

Throughout the decision-making process, it’s vital to avoid common management pitfalls and lose sight of the goals and purpose of the decision on the table.

The goals you’re working toward need to be clearly articulated at the outset of the decision-making process—and constantly reiterated throughout—to ensure they’re ultimately achieved.

“It’s easy, as you get into these conversations, to get so immersed in one substantive part of the equation that you lose track of what the actual purpose is,” Schlesinger says.

Revisiting purpose is especially important when making decisions related to complex initiatives—such as organizational change —to ensure your team feels motivated and aligned and understands how their contributions tie into larger objectives.

Why Are Decision-Making Skills Important?

Effective decision-making can immensely impact organizational performance. By developing your decision-making skills, you can exercise sound judgment and guide your team through the appropriate frameworks and processes—resulting in more data-driven decisions .

You can also anticipate and navigate organizational challenges while analyzing the outcomes of previous efforts, which can have lasting effects on your firm’s success.

Improve Your Decision-Making Skills

Enhancing your decision-making capabilities can be an integral part of your journey to becoming a better manager , reaching your business goals, and advancing your career. In addition to real-world experience, furthering your education by taking a management training course can equip you with a wide range of skills and knowledge that enable both your team and organization to thrive.

Do you want to design, direct, and shape organizational processes to your advantage? Explore Management Essentials , one of our online leadership and management courses , and discover how you can influence the context and environment in which decisions get made.

This post was updated on December 21, 2022. It was originally published on March 31, 2020.

About the Author

The Ethical Leadership Case Study Collection

The Ted Rogers Leadership Centre’s Case Collection, developed in collaboration with experienced teaching faculty, seasoned executives, and alumni, provides instructors with real-life decision-making scenarios to help hone students’ critical-thinking skills and their understanding of what good leaders do. They will be able to leverage the theories, models, and processes being advanced. Students come to understand that workplace dilemmas are rarely black and white, but require them to think through and address competing claims and circumstances. Crucially, they also appreciate how they can, as new leaders and middle managers, improve decisions by creating realistic action plans based on sound stakeholder analysis and communication principles. These case studies are offered free of charge to all instructors.

Cases come in both long and short forms. The long cases provide instructors with tools for delving deeply into subjects related to a variety of decision making and organizational development issues. The short cases, or “minis,” are quick in-class exercises in leadership.

For both the long cases and the minis, teaching-method notes are provided, which include not only recommended in-class facilitation methods, but also grading rubrics, references, and student feedback.

Testimonials

“I have been invited to judge the Leadership Centre’s Annual Ethical Leadership National Case Competition since its inception. Each year, competitors are given a Centre’s case to analyze and present. These cases are like nothing else. They bring the student into the heart of the situation. To excel, students must not only be able to cogently argue the options, but also demonstrate how to implement a decision based on a clear-eyed stakeholder analysis and an understanding of the dynamics of change.” Anne Fawcett, Special Advisor, Caldwell Partners

“I have worked with the Ted Rogers Leadership Centre to both develop and pilot test case materials. Feedback consistently shows that the Centre’s cases resonate with students, providing them with valuable learning experiences.” Chris Gibbs, BComm, MBA, PhD, Associate Professor

"As a judge in the recent national Ted Rogers Ethical Leadership Case Competition, I was very impressed with the quality of the case study prepared by the Leadership Centre. It was brief but well-composed. It exposed the students to ethical quandaries, of the sort they may well face in their business careers. It not only tested their reasoning, but it challenged them to develop a plan of action when faced with incomplete information and imminent deadlines.” Lorne Salzman, Lawyer

We value your feedback

Please inform us of your experience by contacting Dr. Gail Cook Johnson, our mentor-in-residence, at [email protected] .

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

SAMPLE CASE STUDY: MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS & DECISION MAKING CASE STUDY SITUATION

Related Papers

mamama mamamama

William Camp

Trieu Vu Hong

M. Beth Page , Catherine Etmanski

Cohort members in Royal Roads University’s Master’s of Arts in Leadership (MAL) program remain connected and continue to support one another's career development years after they have graduated. In this chapter, we explore the intentional design in MAL that serves to build multiple opportunities for belonging, giving rise to these long-standing relationships. After a brief review of the adult learning literature and the concept of Learning Communities, we present several examples of students accomplishing their learning needs through their cohort. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the implications of these activities for the student, the cohort, and for faculty and staff members.

Anna Greenberg

WACE Asia Pacific …

Skye Cleary

WACE Asia …

Trevor M Budge

R. Wilburn Clouse

DEVELOPING THE ENTREPRENEURIAL SPIRIT IN THE Lincoln Trail Area Development District (LTADD) REGION An 8 countywide regional entrepreneurship development plan and process for the LTADD region of Kentucky.

Judith Lambrecht

Bongeka prisca

RELATED PAPERS

Human Resource Development International

Jim Stewart

Lalit Sharma

… the organization: managing layoffs, divestitures, and …

Anthony F Buono

Case Studies in …

Elayne Coakes

Andreas Schwab

Diana herrera

Richard Badham

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Top 10 Project Management Case Studies with Examples 2024

1. nasa's mars exploration rover: innovative project management in space exploration., 2. apple's iphone development: delivering revolutionary products with precision., 3. tesla's gigafactory construction: exemplary project execution in renewable energy., 4. netflix's content expansion: agile management in the entertainment industry., 5. amazon's prime air drone delivery: pioneering logistics project management., 6. google's waymo self-driving cars: cutting-edge technology meets project efficiency., 7. mcdonald's digital transformation: adaptive project management in fast food., 8. ikea's sustainable store design: eco-friendly project implementation in retail., 9. unicef's vaccine distribution: humanitarian project management at scale., 10. spacex's starlink satellite network: revolutionizing global connectivity with project prowess., discover more stories.

Evaluation of online job portals for HR recruitment selection using AHP in two wheeler automotive industry: a case study

• ORIGINAL ARTICLE
• Published: 12 May 2024

Cite this article

• S. M. Vadivel   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5287-3693 1 &
• Rohan Sunny   ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0002-2347-3081 2  

Automotive companies are booming worldwide in the economy. In order to sustain in the highly competitive world, every organization tries to create itself a trademark in the market. In our research, we looked at how two wheelers automotive company's selection enhances an organizational performance, which ensures the company's future growth. In today's fast-paced, globally integrated world, human resources are one of the most important production variables. It is critical to preserve and improve economic competitiveness by properly selecting and developing these resources. The main aim of this study is to identify the best online job portal website for recruitment at Two Wheeler Company and to suggest an HR strategy which resonates company’s values and culture. In this study, we have selected 6 criteria and 6 online popular job portals for recruitment with a sample of 15 candidates have been selected. Findings reveal that, AHP method has significant results on the selection of best employer, which helps HR Manager to finalize the decision making process/strategies. Towards the managerial implications section, the researcher aims to design an functional and effective HR strategy that can grasp, engage and retain the top talent in the organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Availability of data and material

'Not applicable' in this section.

Abbreviations

Analytic hierarchy process

Artificial intelligence

Analysis of variance

Chief Human Resources Officer

Consistency index

Curriculum vitae

Consistency ratio

Decision making

Faculty Development Programme

Hierarchical linear modelling

Human resources

Research and Development

Randomized index

Structural equation modelling

Search engine optimization

Triple bottom line

Technique for order preference by similarity

Maximum Eigen value

The normalized value of ith criterion for the jth alternative

The normalized value of jth criterion for the ith alternative

The number of alternatives for a certain MCDM problem

The number of criteria for a certain MCDM problem

Avinash Kapse S, Vishal Patil S, Nikhil PV (2021) E-Recruitment. Int J Eng Adv Technol (IJEAT) 1(4):82–86

Google Scholar  

Chahar B, Jain SR, Hatwal V (2021) Mediating role of employee motivation for training, commitment, retention, and performance in higher education institutions. Probl Perspect Manag 19(3):95

Chauhan P (2019) Impact of training and development programs on motivation of employees in “A” graded commercial bank of Nepal. Int J Res Anal Rev 6(3):850–857

Elsafty A, Oraby M (2022) The impact of training on employee retention: an empirical research on the Private Sector in Egypt. Int J Bus Manage 17(5):58–74

Article   Google Scholar  

Habibie M, Mustika I (2020) The effect of training on work motivation and its impact on employee performance (Case Study at BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Headquarters). Int J Innovat Sci Res Technol 5(7):51–57

Haryono S, Supardi S, Udin U (2020) The effect of training and job promotion on work motivation and its implications on job performance: evidence from Indonesia. Manage Sci Lett 10(9):2107–2112

Horodyski P (2023a) Recruiter’s perception of artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools in recruitment. Comp Human Behav Reports 10:100298

Horodyski P (2023b) Applicants’ perception of artificial intelligence in the recruitment process. Comp Human Behav Reports 11:100303

Jack Walker H, Feild HS, Giles WF, Bernerth JB, Short JC (2011) ‘so what do you think of the organization? a contextual priming explanation for recruitment web site characteristics as antecedents of job seekers’ organizational image perceptions. Organ Behav Human Decis Process 2(2011):165–178

Khan N (2018) Does training & employee commitment predict employee retention. In: International Conference on Management and Information Systems (Vol. 21, pp. 120–124)

Lee I (2005) The evolution of E-Recruiting. A content analysis of Fortune 100 Career Websites. J Electronic Commerce Organ 3(3):57–68

Lievens F, Harris MM (2003) Research on Internet recruiting and testing: current status and future directions. Int Rev Ind Organ Psychol 16:131–165

Lin CY, Huang CK (2021) Employee turnover intentions and job performance from a planned change: the effects of an organizational learning culture and job satisfaction. Int J Manpow 42(3):409–423

Martins D, Diaconescu LM (2014) Expatriates recruitment and selection for long-term international assignments in Portuguese companies. Tékhne 12:48–57

RoyChowdhury T, Srimannarayana M (2013) Applicants’ perceptions on online recruitment procedures. Manage Labour Stud 38(3):185–199

Ryu G, Moon SG (2019) The effect of actual workplace learning on job satisfaction and organizational commitment: The moderating role of intrinsic learning motive. J Workplace Learn 31(8):481–497

Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26

Sengazhani Murugesan V, Sequeira AH, Shetty DS, Jauhar SK (2020) Enhancement of mail operational performance of India post facility layout using AHP. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage 11(2):261–273

Sigalingging H, Pakpahan ME (2021) The Effect of training and work environment on employee performance with motivation as an intervening variable At PT Intraco Agroindustry. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business. Econ Law 24(6):130–139.

Sharawat K, Dubey SK (2018) An approach to vendor selection on usability basis by AHP and fuzzy topsis method. In: Soft computing: theories and applications: proceedings of SoCTA 2016, vol 2. Springer, Singapore, pp 595–604

Steil AV, de Cuffa D, Iwaya GH, Pacheco RCDS (2020) Perceived learning opportunities, behavioral intentions and employee retention in technology organizations. J Work Learn 32(2):147–159

Sugiarti E (2022) The influence of training, work environment and career development on work motivation that has an impact on employee performance at PT. Suryamas Elsindo Primatama In West Jakarta. Int J Artif Intell Res 6(1.2).

Sumrit D (2020) Supplier selection for vendor-managed inventory in healthcare using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Decis Sci Lett 9(2):233–256

Thompson LF, Braddy PW, Wuensch KL (2008) E-recruitment and the benefits of organizational web appeal. Comp Human Behav 24(5):2384–2398

Turan FK, Scala NM, Sacre MB, Needy KL (2009) An Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach to the project portfolio management for Organizational Sustainability. In: Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering Research Conference. Institute of Industrial Engineers.

Wadhawan S, Sinha S (2018) Factors Influencing Young Job Seekers Perception towards Job Portals. AIMS Int J Manage 12(3).

Weerarathna RS, Somawardana WSD (2021) Impact on training and employee motivation in an electricity company. Future Work, 497.

Zusman R, Landis R (2002) Applicant preferences for Web-based versus traditional job postings. Comput Hum Behav 18(3):285–329

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to two wheeler Automotive Industries in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, for their invaluable assistance and cooperation. We greatly acknowledge Ms. Ruchi Mishra, Research scholar from NIT Karnataka, for editing this manuscript in better form.

There is no funding provided in this research.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Operations Management Division, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Vandalur-Kelambakkam Road, Chennai, 600127, India

S. M. Vadivel

Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Vandalur-Kelambakkam Road, Chennai, 600127, India

Rohan Sunny

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

S M Vadivel: Methodology, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. Rohan Sunny: Data Curation, Writing—original draft preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Vadivel .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This manuscript has a research study involves human participants (Interview Candidates) for studying job portal evaluations in Indian two wheeler company running in Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

Consent for publication

‘ Not applicable’ in this section.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Vadivel, S.M., Sunny, R. Evaluation of online job portals for HR recruitment selection using AHP in two wheeler automotive industry: a case study. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02358-z

Download citation

Received : 04 December 2023

Revised : 07 April 2024

Accepted : 25 April 2024

Published : 12 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02358-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
• Online job portals
• Automobile two wheeler industries
• Artificial intelligence (AI)
• HR recruitment
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Pharmaceutical Engineering Magazine
• Online Exclusives
• Special Reports
• Facilities & Equipment
• Information Systems
• Product Development
• Production Systems
• Quality Systems
• Regulatory Compliance
• Research + Development
• Supply Chain Management
• White Papers
• iSpeak Blog
• Editorial Calendar
• Article of the Year
• Submit an Article
• Editorial Team

Quality Risk Management for Biopharmaceuticals

In the dynamic and highly regulated world of biopharmaceutical manufacturing, maintaining and ensuring quality is a critical success factor. An effective quality risk management (QRM) system is a key component in the overall quality management infrastructure of biopharmaceutical organizations. It offers a structured, scientific, and risk-based approach to decision-making, addressing potential quality issues during manufacturing. High performing organizations effectively implement QRM into overall quality policies and procedures to enhance and streamline decision-making.

Implementing a robust QRM system is more than just a compliance requirement. It fundamentally contributes to the organization’s commitment to patient safety, product quality, and data integrity. A robust QRM system consists of key characteristics with clearly defined processes that contribute to the system’s success.

Reviewing the Risk Compliance Data

The following graphical data shows the relative compliance risk for pharmaceutical manufacturing organizations based on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory activity (see Figure 1). Monitoring regulatory trends based on actual FDA activity provides useful insight for evaluating internal quality management system performance and proactively identifying areas of opportunity to improve overall compliance. Six major pharmaceutical regulation subparts are charted with relative annual activity increasing significantly from 2016 to 2020. During that period, the Building and Facilities, Laboratory Controls, and Production and Process Controls subparts were the largest areas, receiving 483 observations during regulatory inspections.

Those areas present increased compliance risk that would benefit from a formal review, gap analysis, and remediation to improve overall quality system performance and serve as priorities for time and resources. Regulatory risk during the COVID-19 pandemic decreased dramatically as the FDA performed few, if any, on-site investigations. However, activity during 2022 represents renewed on-site investigations with associated regulatory risk.

Figure 2 provides an annual trend of the top cited pharmaceutical regulations from 483 observations during regulatory investigations. These regulations are from the subparts identified in Figure 1 and the largest contributors to pharmaceutical regulatory risk. Any efforts to evaluate biopharmaceutical risk should consider the specific requirements identified in these regulations and address gaps identified during formal review and gap analysis as part of a QRM plan.

A Case Study

This case study concerns a major biopharmaceutical organization that specializes in producing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used in the treatment of various autoimmune diseases. As part of their commitment to quality and regulatory compliance, they have implemented a robust QRM system.

The organization’s production engineers identified a potential risk in their manufacturing process. The risk was related to variability in the cell culture phase, which could potentially lead to inconsistencies in the final product’s efficacy and safety.

Risk Identification

The QRM team initiated the risk identification process using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) and brainstorming sessions with cross-functional teams. They identified key risk factors, such as pH imbalances, temperature fluctuations, and contamination risks during the cell culture phase.

Risk Assessment

Using a risk matrix, the team assessed the potential impact and likelihood of each identified risk. They determined that temperature fluctuations posed the highest risk due to their high likelihood and potential to significantly impact product quality.

Risk Control

The organization decided to implement additional control measures to mitigate this risk:

• Enhanced monitoring: Installing advanced temperature monitoring systems with automatic alerts for deviations.
• Process improvement: Optimizing the cell culture process to be more robust against minor temperature changes.
• Employee training: Conducting extensive training for staff on the importance of maintaining optimal temperature conditions.

Risk Communication

The QRM team communicated the identified risks, their potential impact, and the planned control measures to all relevant stakeholders, including the manufacturing team, quality assurance department, and senior management.

Implementation

The proposed measures were implemented, and their effectiveness was closely monitored. This included regular review meetings and updates to the risk management plan.

The new control measures led to a significant reduction in temperature-related variability in the cell culture process. As a result, the consistency and quality of the mAbs improved, leading to enhanced patient safety and regulatory compliance.

Lessons Learned

The proactive approach to identifying and managing a critical risk in their manufacturing process demonstrated the importance of a dynamic and integrated QRM system. The case also highlighted the need for continuous monitoring and improvement in risk management practices.

Case Study Conclusion

This case study exemplifies the application of a structured QRM process in the biopharmaceutical industry. It illustrates the importance of identifying, assessing, controlling, and communicating risks in a systematic manner to ensure the production of high-quality biopharmaceutical products.

Characteristics of a Biopharmaceutical Qrm System

Identification of risk is a cross-functional effort that begins in the late development stages prior to technology transfer. In the early stages, research and development (R&D) is the main contributor in the risk identification process, which is facilitated by quality and manufacturing who are participants. As manufacturing develops detailed knowledge of the new process and technology, it provides a strong perspective on potential issues and risks that may exist in day-to-day manufacturing. At this time, all teams must compromise to ensure the final technology and process transfer meet the strategic goals of launching a new product.

Once the technology transfer is complete, manufacturing takes the lead in monitoring risk, along with quality. The manufacturing team also proposes any potential changes, which are reviewed by R&D, quality, and, possibly, commercial participants. Performance metrics are developed jointly between quality and manufacturing and used to periodically report to cross-functional leaders.

The main characteristics of a robust QRM system for biopharmaceutical manufacturers are identified in the following sections.

The initial step in any QRM system is the identification of potential risks. It is necessary to understand what could potentially go wrong in the manufacturing process to manage and mitigate these risks effectively. Elevated performance in risk identification is demonstrated by organizations conducting risk identification with input from cross-functional subject matter experts.

This typically involves brainstorming sessions with relevant stakeholders, analysis of historical data and problem reports, and reviews of process documentation. Clear guidelines should be established for what constitutes a risk, and all identified risks should be documented and maintained in a risk register.

In addition to brainstorming sessions and historical data analysis, other tools such as FMEA, hazard identification, or process hazard analysis can be implemented for a systematic approach. Expert opinions and predictive models can also be used. A successful process should also involve reassessing the risk landscape periodically and after any significant changes. Changes requiring revalidation are a notable trigger to update risk profiles.

A robust biopharmaceutical QRM system recognizes that the process of risk identification is continuous and dynamic, adjusting to changes in procedures, equipment, materials, and the overall business environment. It also considers both internal and external sources of risk.

After identifying risks, it is crucial to evaluate them in terms of their potential impact on product quality and the probability of their occurrence. This allows the company to prioritize its risk management efforts.

Risk assessment usually involves qualitative or quantitative methods. Qualitative methods might include rating risks on a scale from low to high, whereas quantitative methods might involve statistical analysis or simulation. Risk assessment is about creating an informed understanding of the risk and considering the severity of the impact, the likelihood of occurrence, and the detectability of the risk. This aids in prioritizing resources and efforts for risk control.

The process should include risk ranking or scoring systems that can objectively evaluate and compare different risks. Detailed risk maps or matrices can be created to visualize the risk landscape. Risk assessments should be periodically reviewed and updated, especially when new information becomes available.

This step involves deciding on and implementing measures to mitigate the identified risks. Without this step, the risk management process would be incomplete. Risk control involves not only mitigating risks but also deciding whether to accept, transfer, or avoid certain risks. Risk control measures should be proportional to the significance of the risk.

Risk control could involve anything from making changes to the manufacturing process to training employees in new procedures. A key part of this step is documenting the control measures and monitoring their effectiveness over time. After devising risk control measures, a pilot test can be conducted for complex or high-stake measures to ensure their effectiveness before full-scale implementation. The measures should also be reviewed and updated regularly, and particularly after any significant incidents.

Communication and Consultation

Effective communication ensures all relevant stakeholders are aware of the risks and the steps being taken to control them. This not only fosters a culture of risk awareness, but also ensures risk management efforts are coordinated across the organization. Effective communication promotes a shared understanding of risks, risk management practices, and individual roles and responsibilities in managing risk. It should involve all levels of the organization, as well as external stakeholders when appropriate.

This could involve regular meetings, reports, or automated notifications. The key is to ensure that the right information reaches the right people at the right time. The communication process should be a two-way street, allowing feedback from all stakeholders. In addition to meetings and reports, knowledge management systems or collaboration platforms could be used to facilitate communication. Clear protocols should be established for escalation of high-priority risks.

Continuous Monitoring and Review

The risk landscape can change over time, with new risks emerging and old ones disappearing or changing in severity. Continuous monitoring and review ensure that a QRM system stays relevant and effective. Incorporating accurate trend data based on regulatory activity provides an additional level of input elevating the effectiveness of risk management activities.

This can involve regular risk assessments, audits, and reviews of risk control measures. Any changes should be documented and communicated to relevant stakeholders. Monitoring and review processes should include the risks themselves and the effectiveness of the QRM system, changes in context, and the identification of emerging risks.

Risk Management Integration

Risk management should be an integral part of all organizational processes—not a separate activity. This ensures risk considerations are a part of all decisions, rather than being an afterthought. Integrating risk management with other business processes ensures risk management is proactive rather than reactive. It allows risks to be addressed before they can cause problems.

This could involve incorporating risk management into existing process documentation, training employees on risk management, or establishing a risk management committee. This could involve the use of integrated management systems or embedding risk management into standard operating procedures. Cross-functional teams or committees could be established to oversee the integration. Key performance indicators related to risk management should be established and monitored. Audits and reviews should be scheduled regularly and triggered by significant changes or incidents. Feedback from these activities should be used to drive continuous improvement.

Root Cause Analysis

Understanding the root cause of a problem allows for more effective risk management. It helps avoid merely treating the symptoms of a problem, which can lead to recurrence. The goal of root cause analysis is to prevent recurrence of problems by addressing their underlying causes, not just the symptoms. It allows for more efficient use of resources and improves process understanding.

Techniques such as the five whys and fishbone diagrams, among others, can be used to identify root causes. Once identified, these root causes should be addressed in the risk control measures. When conducting root cause analysis, it is important to ensure a blame-free environment where all ideas are considered. Tools such as Pareto charts could be used to prioritize root causes. Root cause prioritization may also reference regulatory trends based on current regulatory activity. Corrective and preventive actions should be devised to address the root causes.

Data-Driven Decision-Making

Decisions about risk management should be based on data, not on gut feelings or intuition. This leads to more objective and effective decisions. The use of data promotes objectivity, consistency, and efficiency in decision-making. It also allows for tracking and demonstrating the performance of the QRM system. An example of data-driven decision-making used by high-performing organizations uses available newsletters, visualizations, and trend tracking regulatory data to provide accurate insights to compliance risk.

This might involve collecting and analyzing data on process performance, product quality, and the effectiveness of risk control measures. Decision-making tools such as decision trees or Bayesian networks can also be used. An effective process should include not only collection and analysis of data, but also data management practices to ensure data integrity and usability. Advanced data analytics or artificial intelligence could be used for predictive risk modeling. Regulatory trends and current regulatory activity are also indicators providing insight into predictive risks of regulatory audits.

Quality Culture

A strong culture of quality fosters individual accountability, intrinsic motivation, and proactive behavior in managing risk and it ensures risk management is not the responsibility of just the quality department. Successful organizations building a strong culture of quality and compliance have notable focus and support from executive leadership. A successful quality culture can only succeed with outstanding support from organizational executives. The “tone at the top” significantly drives the performance and adherence of the organization to quality principles.

This could involve training, recognition programs, or changes to organizational structure. It is important to regularly assess the culture of quality and adjust as needed. Activities to foster a quality culture could include workshops, training sessions, recognition programs, and team-building activities. Regular culture assessments could be conducted through surveys or interviews and the findings used to inform culture improvement initiatives.

A robust biopharmaceutical QRM system recognizes that the process of risk identification is continuous and dynamic, adjusting to changes in procedures, equipment, materials, and the overall business environment.

Flexibility and Adaptability

As the organization and its external environment change, the QRM system needs to be able to adapt. A rigid system that cannot handle change will quickly become ineffective. A flexible and adaptable QRM system allows the organization to respond effectively to changes and challenges, turning them into opportunities rather than threats. It helps ensure the system’s resilience and long-term sustainability. Using data-driven metrics and tracking tools facilitates effective management of quality and compliance risk.

This can involve regular reviews of the QRM system and a process for making changes to it. Feedback from stakeholders should be actively sought and incorporated. Scenario analysis or stress testing could be used to evaluate and improve the system’s adaptability. A change management process should be established to handle changes in a systematic and controlled manner. Integral to a change management process should be the incorporation of risk assessment and evaluation relevant to any proposed changes.

Compliance with Regulations

Biopharmaceutical companies operate in a heavily regulated environment. Compliance with regulations avoids legal problems and ensures products are safe and effective. It also promotes trust and credibility among stakeholders, and it provides a baseline for risk management practices.

Compliance can be ensured by keeping up to date with regulatory changes, incorporating these changes into the QRM system, and regularly auditing for compliance. Regular training should be provided to keep staff current on regulatory requirements. Regulatory intelligence activities could be conducted to anticipate and prepare for upcoming changes.

Compliance checks should be integrated into the risk assessment and review processes. Additionally, compliance reports and newsletters summarizing regulatory activity provide valuable insight into risks and trends associated with regulatory compliance for life sciences. Further expanding compliance data to broader time horizons increases insights into longer-term trends and the value of current trends in a historical perspective.

Traceability and Documentation

Documentation provides evidence of the QRM system’s functioning. It also allows for traceability, which is crucial for root cause analysis and for demonstrating compliance with regulations. Proper documentation allows the team to preserve institutional knowledge, learn from past experiences, and demonstrate compliance. Traceability is crucial for investigating incidents, validating processes, and ensuring product quality.

Documentation should be maintained for all risk management activities, including risk identification, assessment, and control. It should be kept in a format that is easily accessible and understandable. Traceability can be maintained through unique identifiers for risks and control measures, and by linking related documents. A document management system could be used to manage and control documents. The system should support version control, approval processes, and easy retrieval of documents. Traceability could be maintained through traceability matrices or dedicated software systems.

An effective QRM system in biopharmaceutical manufacturing is multifaceted, involving the identification and assessment of potential risks, robust control mechanisms, effective communication strategies, and regular monitoring and review procedures. The QRM system should be flexible and adaptable, grounded in data-driven decision-making, and deeply integrated within the organization’s culture and processes. The risk management process, which includes risk identification and mitigation, is a cross-functional effort requiring participation from R&D, quality, and manufacturing, with metrics for monitoring and reporting process effectiveness to cross-functional leaders.

Organizations performing at elevated levels consistently demonstrate an ability to incorporate risk criteria into daily operations using various tools to evaluate risk according to product and patient impact. Compliance with regulations and maintaining detailed traceability and documentation are also of paramount importance. Although implementing such a comprehensive system can be complex, the benefits of ensuring product quality and safety, and ultimately patient health, are profound. The successful deployment of QRM necessitates a continual commitment to each of these characteristics, fostering a culture of quality that permeates every aspect of the organization.

Not a Member Yet?

To continue reading this article and to take advantage of full access to Pharmaceutical Engineering magazine articles, technical reports, white papers and exclusive content on the latest pharmaceutical engineering news, join ISPE today. In addition to exclusive access to all of the content in Pharmaceutical Engineering magazine, you will get online access to 24 ISPE Good Practice Guides, exclusive networking events, regulatory resources, Communities of Practice, and more.

Learn more about the valuable benefits you'll receive with an ISPE membership.

Join Today Member Login

Related Articles

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) and cell and gene therapies (C&GTs) represent a promising medical product class that employs gene therapy, cell therapy, or tissue engineering to address various diseases and injuries. One critical aspect of ATMP and C&GT manufacturing is using cell culture media. With thousands of ATMPs and C&GTs in clinical trial phases, the role of...

Antibody engineering has transformed the development of therapeutic antibodies, enabling the creation of specific and effective treatments for a range of diseases. These antibody-based therapeutics are advancing in clinical development at a rapid rate and are being approved in record numbers. Currently, more than 100 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been approved for the treatment of various...

Although traditional tank farm systems have long been the cornerstone of buffer preparation, they face challenges that have grown with the expansion of processing scale in the industry.