Titus (c. 62-64)
Search results by book, blb searches, search the bible.
Advanced Options
There are options set in 'Advanced Options'
Other Searches
|
* 'Number Delimiters' only apply to 'Paragraph Order'
Daily devotionals.
Blue Letter Bible offers several daily devotional readings in order to help you refocus on Christ and the Gospel of His peace and righteousness.
Recognizing the value of consistent reflection upon the Word of God in order to refocus one's mind and heart upon Christ and His Gospel of peace, we provide several reading plans designed to cover the entire Bible in a year.
The Blue Letter Bible ministry and the BLB Institute hold to the historical, conservative Christian faith, which includes a firm belief in the inerrancy of Scripture. Since the text and audio content provided by BLB represent a range of evangelical traditions, all of the ideas and principles conveyed in the resource materials are not necessarily affirmed, in total, by this ministry.
View Desktop Site
Bible reference, biblical language resources, theological resources, topical indexes, help & support, devotionals.
Blue Letter Bible study tools make reading, searching and studying the Bible easy and rewarding.
Blue Letter Bible is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization
©2024 Blue Letter Bible | Privacy Policy
Translation selection order copied to bibles tab order, bibles tab order copied to translation selection order, translation selection order and bibles tab order have been reset.
You can copy the order of your preferred Bible translations from the Bibles Tab to the Version Picker (this popup) or vice versa. The Bibles Tab is found in the Tools feature on Bible pages:
Note: MLA no longer requires the URL as part of their citation standard. Individual instructors or editors may still require the use of URLs.
Share this page, email this page.
You must be logged in to send email.
Subscribe to the newsletter.
Interlinear |
Bibles |
Cross-Refs |
Commentaries |
Dictionaries |
Miscellaneous |
Login to your account.
Email / username or password was incorrect!
Check your email for password retrieval
Keep me logged in!
Did you forget your password?
Register a new BLB account
Complete the form below to register [?]
Error: That Email is already registered
Error: Please provide a valid Email
Error: Passwords should have at least 6 characters
Error: Passwords do not match
Error: Please provide a valid first name
Error: That username is already taken
Error: Usernames should only contain letters, numbers, dots, dashes, or underscores
← Login to Your Account
Passwords should have at least 6 characters. Usernames should only contain letters, numbers, dots, dashes, or underscores.
Thank you for registering. A verification email has been sent to the address you provided.
Your partnership makes all we do possible. Would you prayerfully consider a gift of support today?
Cookie Notice: Our website uses cookies to store user preferences. By proceeding, you consent to our cookie usage. Please see Blue Letter Bible's Privacy Policy for cookie usage details.
New testament.
by Roy Demarest
The Pauline Epistles—or the Epistles of Paul—were letters written to the early Church by the apostle Paul. God preserved many of those letters for us as books of the Bible.
These ancient epistles contain valuable insight into modern-day Christian living, while also providing us a snapshot of the early Christian Church.
Paul wrote more books of the Bible than any other author—including Moses, Solomon and any of the original apostles. He is credited with writing at least 13 books in the New Testament (14, if we include the book of Hebrews). His writings have been scrutinized by more scholars and students of the Scriptures than perhaps any other Bible author.
The Pauline Epistles are essential to read and study if we want a fuller understanding of the Holy Scriptures. But how much do you understand about these books? Why were they written? To whom were they written? What were the issues that Paul was dealing with in these many letters?
Epistle is simply a word that means a “written message” or a “letter.” Some of Paul’s epistles were written from jail cells (commonly referred to as Paul’s Prison Epistles); some are addressed to individuals; and some are addressed to congregations. Paul’s letters were mostly dictated to an amanuensis (secretary), except for the letter to the Galatians, at least part of which Paul says he wrote with his own hand (Galatians 6:11).
Paul wrote these letters over approximately a 15- to 20-year period between about A.D. 48 and 67. The estimates of the dates these letters were written will vary slightly from authority to authority, but they were within this general time frame.
Paul’s letters provide us insight into the congregations of the early Christian Church in the first century. What can we learn from these 14 letters that were preserved for us under direct inspiration from God (2 Timothy 3:16)? In studying them carefully, we can find answers to many questions, such as:
The Pauline Epistles don’t actually appear in the Bible in the same order they were written. Not all Bible authorities agree on the correct order of Paul’s letters, but context clues within the letters themselves along with extrabiblical evidence allow us to make a reasonably accurate guess:
When Paul wasn’t writing letters to congregations of the early Church, he was either visiting them in person or journeying through the Roman Empire to spread the gospel message. Those journeys are recorded in the book of Acts, giving us extra insight into both the Pauline Epistles themselves and the general time frame when Paul would have written those epistles.
For instance, the books of Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians and Philemon—the Prison Epistles—would have been written while Paul was under house arrest in Rome.
(If you’d like a more detailed look at Paul’s journeys and the timeline of the epistles, read “ Chronology of Paul’s Journeys and Epistles .”)
It’s not clear whether Paul wrote the book of Hebrews or not. Unlike his other epistles, his name doesn’t appear anywhere in the letter. Some early traditions attribute the book to Paul, but the earliest available copies of the Bible’s manuscripts do not include an author’s name.
Much of the content of the Pauline Epistles was aimed at correcting false teachings and lax behavior that had crept into congregations of the early Church. It didn’t take long before heresy, false doctrine and spiritual compromises started to sneak into the early Church. Much of the content of the Pauline Epistles was aimed at correcting false teachings and lax behavior that had crept into congregations of the early Church.
But Paul was also an encourager. Many of his letters are filled with hope, always returning to “the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 3:14).
Paul was filled with a “deep concern for all the churches” (2 Corinthians 11:28). He wanted nothing more than to see God’s people remain faithful to their calling and join him in claiming “the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will give to me on that Day, and not to me only but also to all who have loved His appearing” (2 Timothy 4:8).
Here are just a few of the topics that Paul addresses in these letters:
Let’s now look at a very brief summary of Paul’s letters (in the order they appear in the Bible).
In 1 Corinthians 13—a chapter of the Bible that’s come to be known as “the Love Chapter”—we find Paul’s explanation of true, godly love.
In one of the Bible’s most famous passages, Paul writes, “Love suffers long and is kind; love does not envy; love does not parade itself, is not puffed up; does not behave rudely, does not seek its own, is not provoked, thinks no evil; does not rejoice in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never fails” (1 Corinthians 13:4-8).
This Love Chapter in the Bible is an excellent resource for Christian self-examination. It’s important to look at ourselves and make sure the way we treat others matches up with this description of how God wants us to treat others. Study more in our article “ The Love Chapter .”
The book of 2 Timothy appears to be the very last letter Paul wrote before he was executed by the Roman government (or, at least, the last epistle that was preserved in the Bible). In this final farewell letter, Paul urges the young pastor Timothy to treasure his calling and to “be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry” (2 Timothy 4:5).
For Paul’s part, he was focusing less on his own imminent death and more on the incredible future that God is preparing for the human race.
He wrote: “For I am already being poured out as a drink offering, and the time of my departure is at hand. I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith. Finally, there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will give to me on that Day, and not to me only but also to all who have loved His appearing” (2 Timothy 4:6-8).
A few paragraphs later, the final Pauline Epistle ends with these words of hope: “The Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Grace be with you. Amen” (2 Timothy 4:22).
The apostle Paul was one of God’s greatest servants and was used by Him to boldly proclaim the good news of the coming Kingdom of God to the world in the first century and, through these epistles, to people in all ages.
The Pauline Epistles didn’t just matter a couple of thousand years ago. The lessons Paul teaches in those letters are just as important for us today. As we also journey toward “the crown of righteousness” that Paul claimed, each of these letters is vitally important for us to understand. (And you can read about each one in greater depth in our Related Articles section below!)
About the Author
Roy and Pauline Demarest have been married for more than 50 years and have three sons and six grandchildren. Roy served as pastor of the Orlando, Florida, congregation of the Church of God, a Worldwide Association, until his retirement in 2020.
Get the latest blog posts from Life, Hope & Truth straight to your inbox.
Never miss a post! Sign up to receive the week's latest articles, blog posts and updates.
Print subscriptions available in U.S., Canada and Europe
A book’s total score is based on multiple factors, including the number of people who have voted for it and how highly those voters ranked the book.
by 4.34 avg rating — 5,149 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.87 avg rating — 1,101 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.10 avg rating — 229 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.95 avg rating — 601 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.33 avg rating — 343 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.18 avg rating — 34 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.26 avg rating — 1,783 ratings , and | saving… | by (Goodreads Author) 4.25 avg rating — 16 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.21 avg rating — 286 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.16 avg rating — 240 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.00 avg rating — 261 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.19 avg rating — 67 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.26 avg rating — 137 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.60 avg rating — 219 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.41 avg rating — 133 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.79 avg rating — 70 ratings , and | saving… | by (Editor) 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating , and | saving… | by (Editor) 4.08 avg rating — 50 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.03 avg rating — 68 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.22 avg rating — 917 ratings , and | saving… | by (editor) 4.33 avg rating — 45 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.06 avg rating — 1,300 ratings , and | saving… | by (editor) 3.63 avg rating — 219 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.20 avg rating — 318 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.19 avg rating — 129 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.29 avg rating — 366 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.47 avg rating — 532 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.50 avg rating — 279 ratings , and | saving… | by (editor) 4.03 avg rating — 65 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.94 avg rating — 1,014 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.13 avg rating — 255 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.97 avg rating — 144 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.56 avg rating — 286 ratings , and | saving… | by (Editor) 4.11 avg rating — 9 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.00 avg rating — 19 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.57 avg rating — 21 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.92 avg rating — 128 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.34 avg rating — 316 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.91 avg rating — 183 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.27 avg rating — 33 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.82 avg rating — 121 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.12 avg rating — 115 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.86 avg rating — 117 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.94 avg rating — 131 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.68 avg rating — 28 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.85 avg rating — 286 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.21 avg rating — 233 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.03 avg rating — 790 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.40 avg rating — 43 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.02 avg rating — 179 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.00 avg rating — 42 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.27 avg rating — 22 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.95 avg rating — 100 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.03 avg rating — 126 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.09 avg rating — 183 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.72 avg rating — 18 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.54 avg rating — 26 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.49 avg rating — 100 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.36 avg rating — 233 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.12 avg rating — 16 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.22 avg rating — 9 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.50 avg rating — 4 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.80 avg rating — 20 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.67 avg rating — 96 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.70 avg rating — 56 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.50 avg rating — 18 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.82 avg rating — 77 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.80 avg rating — 41 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.73 avg rating — 60 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.27 avg rating — 11 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.06 avg rating — 16 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.14 avg rating — 36 ratings , and | saving… | by 0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.37 avg rating — 70 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.50 avg rating — 2 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.00 avg rating — 17 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.94 avg rating — 34 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.91 avg rating — 65 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.31 avg rating — 45 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.62 avg rating — 8 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.46 avg rating — 71 ratings , and | saving… | by (Goodreads Author) 4.43 avg rating — 213 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.00 avg rating — 1 rating , and | saving… | by (Goodreads Author) 4.24 avg rating — 93 ratings , and | saving… | by (Goodreads Author) 4.41 avg rating — 17 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.37 avg rating — 3,100 ratings , and | saving… | by (Translator) 3.71 avg rating — 41 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.21 avg rating — 76 ratings , and | saving… | by 3.50 avg rating — 6 ratings , and | saving… | by (Goodreads Author) 4.44 avg rating — 55 ratings , and | saving… | by (Goodreads Author) 3.67 avg rating — 3 ratings , and | saving… | by (Goodreads Author) 5.00 avg rating — 2 ratings , and | saving… | by (Goodreads Author) 0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings , and | saving… | by (Goodreads Author) (Editor) 0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.46 avg rating — 138 ratings , and | saving… | by 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating , and | saving… | by 4.41 avg rating — 22 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.00 avg rating — 1 rating , and | saving… | by 3.92 avg rating — 12 ratings , and | saving… | by 4.38 avg rating — 50 ratings , and | saving… |
Featured news & interviews.
Anyone can add books to this list.
Friends votes, how to vote.
To vote on existing books from the list, beside each book there is a link vote for this book clicking it will add that book to your votes.
To vote on books not in the list or books you couldn't find in the list, you can click on the tab add books to this list and then choose from your books, or simply search.
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Blog categories, how to read paul's letters chronologically.
Old Woman Reading a Lectionary (So-called Portrait of Rembrandt's Mother), circa 1630. Credit: Wikimedia Commons .
Back when I was asking Google how the Bible was written, I stumbled across a variety of supposedly “chronological” reading plans for the Bible. Nearly all of them were pious lists that emphasized reading in an order that reinforces a particular theology. They purposefully carry you through the texts in a way that suggests a certain view of Jesus, a view that would change if you simply read the texts in a different order.
Since the word “chronological” in that sense has absolutely nothing to do with when the original texts were written, I thought I’d offer an alternative: a 30-day plan for how to read Paul’s letters chronologically. But first: an explanation.
The late Marcus Borg urged us to read the New Testament in the order in which the books were actually written rather than the order in which they appear in modern Bibles. We should start with the letters of Paul because they are our earliest texts from the Christ movement. Don't read Acts, don't read the gospels. Save those for later. Paul's letters came first .
Although many letters in the New Testament are claimed to have been written by Paul, most scholars who have studied them have reached the conclusion that only seven of the letters were actually written by Paul when he lived in the early 1 century, around 20 to 30 years after the death of Jesus. Where did the other letters come from? They were written by other people in Paul’s name in the late 1 and early 2 centuries. "Beginning with seven of Paul's letters," Borg writes,
illustrates that there were vibrant Christian communities spread throughout the Roman Empire before there were written Gospels. His letters provide a "window" into the life of very early Christian communities.
The seven authentic or “undisputed” letters of Paul, in roughly chronological order, are as follows:
See the book | Listen to the Author
Talk interview
By far the easiest way I’ve found to read these letters in chronological order is to read The Authentic Letters of Paul (Dewey et al), which not only puts the letters in chronological order but also grapples with places where others may have edited and rearranged the letters, and/or added new material.
Full disclosure: I was involved, albeit only slightly, in the editing process of this book, but I truly have yet to encounter another book that refuses to pull punches on this issue. Why should it be difficult to find Paul’s letters arranged in some sort of chronological order? It shouldn’t be. This sort of resource is the work of good historians, and that’s what I appreciate about it. They took a risk and put an answer out there. I'd have loved to take a New Testament class that gave me a couple attempts like this and asked me to compare the portraits of Paul that emerged.
Related Resource: Listen to a free 2-part interview with the authors and translators of The Authentic Letters of Paul with Ron Way on AuthorTalk Radio.
Have you been meaning to read (or re-read) Paul's letters? We'll be hosting a 30-day challenge here on the Westar blog. How to participate.
This reading plan should get you through the seven authentic letters of Paul in 30 days based on The Authentic Letters of Paul . That's a pretty intense reading schedule, given that Paul's arguments can be a real pain to follow. You may find that you want to slow the pace down to 60 days instead (which you can accomplish by reading 1 to 2 chapters a day instead of 2 to 3).If you try it, let me know how it worked for you! What sort of Paul did you discover? Did you reach the same conclusions as Bernard Brandon Scott ? Do you know of other attempts to arrange Paul's letters chronologically?
Day 1: 1 Thessalonians 1–3
Day 2: 1 Thessalonians 4–5
Day 3: Galatians 1–2
Day 4: Galatians 3–4
Day 5: Galatians 5–6
Day 6: 1 Corinthians 1–2
Day 7: 1 Corinthians 3–4 There are likely some insertions from other writers mixed in
Day 8: 1 Corinthians 5–6
Day 9: 1 Corinthians 7–8
Day 10: 1 Corinthians 9–10
Day 11: 1 Corinthians 11–12 There are likely some insertions from other writers mixed in
Day 12: 1 Corinthians 13–14 There are likely some insertions from other writers mixed in
Day 13: 1 Corinthians 15–16
Day 14: 2 Corinthians 2:14–3:18 Defense of Paul’s Credibility (part 1)
Day 15: 2 Corinthians 4–6:13; 7:2–4 Defense of Paul’s Credibility (part 2)
Day 16: 2 Corinthians 10–13 Parody of “A Fool’s Speech”
Day 17: 2 Corinthians 1:1–2:13; 7:5–16 Letter of Reconciliation
Day 18: 2 Corinthians 8 Collection Appeal to Corinth
Day 19: 2 Corinthians 9 Collection Appeal to Achaia
Day 20: Philemon
Day 21: Philippians 4:10–20 A Thank-you Letter
Day 22: Philippians 1:1–3:1a; 4:4–9 Letter from Prison (part 1)
Day 23: Philippians 21–23 Letter from Prison (part 2)
Day 24: Philippians 3:1b–4:3 Paul’s Testimony and Advice
Day 25: Romans 1–3
Day 26: Romans 4–6 There are likely some insertions from other writers mixed in
Day 27: Romans 7–9
Day 28: Romans 10–12
Day 29: Romans 13–15 There are likely some insertions from other writers mixed in
Day 30: Romans 16 Letter of Recommendation
There are likely some insertions from other writers mixed in 6/3/2015 12:00 pm update: A couple gracious readers have reminded me that, of course, Marcus Borg himself published a chronological reading of the New Testament in 2012, a couple years after The Authentic Letters . He uses the NRSV translation, and he places Philemon and Philippians before 2 Corinthians.
Cassandra Farrin joined Westar in 2010 and currently serves as the Marketing & Outreach Director. A US-UK Fulbright Scholar, she has an M.A. in Religious Studies from Lancaster University (England) and a B.A. in Religious Studies from Willamette University. She is passionate about books and projects that in some way address the intersection of ethics and early Christian history.
Subscribe to our email list and receive updates, news, and more.
Select Page
Watch the video above and talk about it with a group or mentor. Learn more.
Key Points:
Romans : This is Paul’s masterpiece where he explains the deep need all of us have to be made right with God, and the fact that this is only possible through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross. 1 Corinthians : Paul points out the kinds of sins churches and Christians can fall into, and invites us to put away those sins and live a life that honors God. 2 Corinthians : In this letter, we learn about the new covenant that we are part of in Christ, which leads to a life of worship of God and service to others. Galatians : Paul demonstrates that salvation is only possible through faith in Christ. Any addition to faith is a compromise to the Gospel. Ephesians : Paul unpacks all the blessings that belong to us in Christ. He shows the nature of faith and the power of the church as the people of God. Philippians : This letter explains the deep joy we should have in life as Christians. Joy for today and joy for tomorrow. Colossians : Jesus is supreme above everything in creation. Because of his work on the cross, we can live lives that honor God. Paul shows us how. 1 Thessalonians : Paul gives us a glimpse of our future, talking about the return of Christ and how to prepare for it. 2 Thessalonians : Paul shares more about our future and the world’s future when Jesus returns. 1 Timothy : Paul explains the organization of the church that will lead to maturity. 2 Timothy : This is Paul’s final letter to the man he mentored. It’s a personal letter that shows us Paul’s heart for God. Titus : This letter to a young man and the church he served shows us how to help each other to maturity. Philemon : Paul writes this letter asking Philemon to forgive his runaway slave who has just become a Christian.
See Also: New Testament , Theology
The PG Community channel is where we gather videos from trusted YouTubers who aren't yet official authors on our site.
by Ryan Nelson | Feb 28, 2019 | Bible characters | 11 comments
The Apostle Paul was one of the most influential leaders of the early Christian church. He played a crucial role in spreading the gospel to the Gentiles (non-Jews) during the first century, and his missionary journeys took him all throughout the Roman empire.
Paul started more than a dozen churches, and he’s traditionally considered the author of 13 books of the Bible —more than any other biblical writer. For this reason, Saint Paul is often considered one of the most influential people in history. He had a greater impact on the world’s religious landscape than any other person besides Jesus, and perhaps Muhammad.
But before he was known as a tireless champion of Christianity, Paul was actually known for persecuting Christians. The Book of Acts tells us that Paul was even present at the death of the first Christian martyr—where he “approved the stoning of Stephen” (Acts 8:1).
Over the last two millennia, countless books have been written about Paul and his teachings. In this beginner’s guide, we’ll explore the basics of what we know—and don’t know—about this important biblical figure.
Here’s what we’re going to cover:
Paul’s conversion on the road to damascus, when did paul live, did saul become paul.
How many times was paul shipwrecked, assassination attempts against paul, paul’s appeal to caesar.
How did paul die.
Let’s begin! We’ll start with the basics.
Most of what we know about the Apostle Paul (also known as Saint Paul or Saul of Tarsus) comes from the writings attributed to him and the Book of Acts . However, there are also a couple of writings from the late first and early second centuries that refer to him, including Clement of Rome ’s letter to the Corinthians.
Before becoming a follower of Christ, Paul was a prime example of a “righteous” Jew. He came from a God-fearing family (2 Timothy 1:3), he was a Pharisee like his father (Acts 23:6), and he was educated by a respected rabbi named Gamaliel (Acts 22:3). His Jewish credentials included his heritage, discipline, and zeal.
In Philippians 3, he explains why if anyone ever had reason to believe that they could be saved by their adherence to Judaism, it was him:
“ If someone else thinks they have reasons to put confidence in the flesh, I have more: circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; in regard to the law, a Pharisee; as for zeal, persecuting the church; as for righteousness based on the law, faultless. ” —Philippians 3:4–6
He goes on to say that he considers this righteousness “garbage” next to the righteousness that comes from faith in Christ (Philippians 3:8–9).
Paul’s identity used to be rooted in his Jewishness, but after his dramatic conversion on the road to Damascus (more on that later) his identity as a Jew became secondary to his identity as a follower of Christ. He spent much of his ministry dismantling the idea that in order to have a saving faith in Jesus, Gentiles must first “become Jewish” by adopting the Mosaic Law . Being a “Hebrew of Hebrews” lent him credibility and expertise when speaking to Jewish audiences, and helped him speak into the Law’s inability to make people righteous.
Paul was born in Tarsus—a prosperous city in the province of Cilicia—which granted him Roman citizenship. This status gave him special privileges, and in some cases saved him from abuse (Acts 22:25–29).
In Acts 25, Paul was put on trial, and his accusers asked that he stand trial in Jerusalem, where they planned to ambush and kill him (Acts 25:3). Paul leveraged his Roman citizenship to demand Caesar himself hear his case (Acts 25:11), and procurator has no choice but to grant him this right. Unfortunately, the book ends before he gets to Caesar—because Paul’s story isn’t the point of Acts .
As a Roman citizen, Paul possessed a coveted status. Some, like the centurion in Acts 22:28, had to pay a lot of money to have it. Others served in the Roman military for 25 years to earn it. But Paul was born into this privilege. And instead of lording this status over everyone, he preached about a citizenship which everyone could choose to claim by accepting Jesus as Lord:
“ But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ, who, by the power that enables him to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body. ” —Philippians 3:20–21
As a Pharisee, before his conversion to Christianity, Paul saw Christians (who were predominantly Jewish at the time) as a scourge against Judaism. From Paul’s perspective, these people were blaspheming about God and leading his people astray. He believed that Jesus was a mere man, and was therefore rightfully executed for claiming to be God.
And since Jesus’ followers kept spreading the idea that Jesus was God, Paul thought Christians were sinners of the worst sort.
So it shouldn’t come as a surprise that Paul made his debut in the Bible as an intense persecutor of Christians. (Though he’s first mentioned by his Hebrew name, Saul—we’ll get to that soon.)
When Stephen was stoned to death for preaching the gospel, “the witnesses laid their coats at the feet of a young man named Saul . . . And Saul approved of their killing him” (Acts 7:58–8:1).
Later, Paul asked the high priest for permission to take Christians (known as followers of “the Way”) as prisoners:
“ Meanwhile, Saul was still breathing out murderous threats against the Lord’s disciples. He went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues in Damascus, so that if he found any there who belonged to the Way, whether men or women, he might take them as prisoners to Jerusalem. ” —Acts 9:1–2
Paul’s notoriety as a persecutor of Christians made believers uncomfortable around him even after his baptism, and it took a while for them to believe that he’d really changed (Acts 9:26).
After putting his faith in Jesus, Paul immediately began preaching publicly (Acts 9:20), and he quickly built a reputation as a formidable teacher (Acts 9:22). Throughout the rest of Acts, Paul is a prominent figure who plays a pivotal role in bringing the gospel to non-Jewish communities.
As we see from Paul’s own letters, he was highly respected in the increasingly scattered Christian communities, many of which he started himself. His letters frequently address problems and questions these churches wrote to him about.
While Paul’s status as a Pharisee and his intense devotion to the Law might have made him well-suited to preach to the Jews, Paul had a different calling. Before Paul ever preached the gospel, Jesus said, “This man is my chosen instrument to proclaim my name to the Gentiles and their kings and to the people of Israel” (Acts 9:15).
Fun fact: Paul did proclaim the name of Jesus to a Gentile king. In Acts 26, he shared the gospel with King Herod Agrippa II while he was on trial in Caesarea.
Paul’s calling as an apostle to the Gentiles was also reinforced by the original apostles . In his letter to the church in Galatians , Paul wanted the Galatians to know that they didn’t need to follow the Law of Moses to be saved. The gospel he preached to them was enough, and they just needed to have faith in Jesus. To prove his point, he told the Galatians that Peter (also known as Cephas), James , and John had nothing to add to Paul’s rendition of the gospel:
“ As for those who were held in high esteem—whatever they were makes no difference to me; God does not show favoritism—they added nothing to my message. On the contrary, they recognized that I had been entrusted with the task of preaching the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised. For God, who was at work in Peter as an apostle to the circumcised, was also at work in me as an apostle to the Gentiles. James, Cephas and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we should go to the Gentiles, and they to the circumcised. ” —Galatians 2:6–9
And if Peter, James, and John had nothing to add to what Paul preached, then why would the Galatians listen to someone else who said there was more they needed to do to be saved?
As an apostle to the Gentiles, not only did Paul need to engage the cultures he was trying to reach, but he had to protect these new believers from the weight of obligation that Jewish Christians often tried to impose on them. He was constantly trying to prove that the Gentiles didn’t need to adopt Jewish customs like circumcision in order to place their faith in Jesus and receive the Holy Spirit.
Paul established numerous churches throughout Europe and Asia Minor, and was typically driven toward regions no one had evangelised to before:
“ It has always been my ambition to preach the gospel where Christ was not known, so that I would not be building on someone else’s foundation ” —Romans 15:20
The Book of Acts and Paul’s letters specifically record three missionary journeys to various cities throughout Europe and Asia, each lasting for several years. (We’ll discuss these more later, or you can read more about them now .)
Everywhere he went, Paul established new Christian communities and helped these fledgling believers develop their own leadership. He corresponded with these churches regularly and visited them as often as he could. Occasionally, they financially supported him so that he could continue his ministry elsewhere (Philippians 4:14–18, 2 Corinthians 11:8–9).
Before Jesus ascended to heaven, he promised his followers they would receive power through the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:8). The Book of Acts records that the apostles performed miracles, and Paul is no exception. He healed people, cast out spirits, and even brought someone back from the dead. (Though to be fair, if Paul hadn’t talked him to sleep, the boy wouldn’t have fallen out of that window to begin with.)
Here are the miracles associated with Paul:
To those who saw and heard Paul, these miracles proved his authority from God, just as Jesus’ miracles once demonstrated his (Mark 2:10).
One of the most remarkable aspects of Paul’s life is that as a young man, he was well-known for persecuting Christians, but by the end of his life, he’d endured significant persecution as a Christian. The Book of Acts and Paul’s own letters provide an account of how this dramatic change happened.
“ Meanwhile, Saul was still breathing out murderous threats against the Lord’s disciples. He went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues in Damascus, so that if he found any there who belonged to the Way, whether men or women, he might take them as prisoners to Jerusalem. As he neared Damascus on his journey, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. He fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’ ‘Who are you, Lord?’ Saul asked. ‘I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting,’ he replied. ‘Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.’ The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone. Saul got up from the ground, but when he opened his eyes he could see nothing. So they led him by the hand into Damascus. For three days he was blind, and did not eat or drink anything. ” —Acts 9:1–9
This famous encounter is referred to as the road to Damascus, the Damascene conversion, and the Damascus Christophany (a vision of Christ distinct from his incarnation). On Paul’s way to round up some Christians as prisoners, Jesus stopped him dead in his tracks and crippled him with blindness.
But while Paul now knew the true identity and power of the one he had been persecuting, he had yet to learn Jesus’ grace and power to heal. And for that, he would need to meet a follower of Christ.
“ In Damascus there was a disciple named Ananias. The Lord called to him in a vision, ‘Ananias!’ ‘Yes, Lord,’ he answered. The Lord told him, ‘Go to the house of Judas on Straight Street and ask for a man from Tarsus named Saul, for he is praying. In a vision he has seen a man named Ananias come and place his hands on him to restore his sight.’ ‘Lord,’ Ananias answered, ‘I have heard many reports about this man and all the harm he has done to your holy people in Jerusalem. And he has come here with authority from the chief priests to arrest all who call on your name.’ But the Lord said to Ananias, ‘Go! This man is my chosen instrument to proclaim my name to the Gentiles and their kings and to the people of Israel. I will show him how much he must suffer for my name.’ Then Ananias went to the house and entered it. Placing his hands on Saul, he said, ‘Brother Saul, the Lord—Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you were coming here—has sent me so that you may see again and be filled with the Holy Spirit.’ Immediately, something like scales fell from Saul’s eyes, and he could see again. He got up and was baptized, and after taking some food, he regained his strength. ” —Acts 9:10–19
Paul spent the next few days with the very Christians he had come to capture, and he immediately began preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ—to the confusion of Christians and Jews alike. It would take time for Paul’s reputation as a Christian preacher to outgrow his reputation as a persecutor of Christians.
In his own accounts of his conversion, Paul says that Jesus appeared to him (1 Corinthians 15:7–8), and he claims that Jesus revealed the gospel to him (Galatians 1:11–16).
In his letter to the Corinthians, Paul appeals to the authority of eyewitness testimony, pointing out that Jesus appeared to many people including himself. In his letter to the Galatians, he builds the case that the Galatians can trust the gospel he presented them because it came directly from God, and the first apostles supported his message (Galatians 2:6–9).
This encounter on the road to Damascus completely redefined who Paul was, and it changed the purpose of his journey from silencing Christians to speaking out in support of them. Instead of taking away from their number, he added to it. And once Jesus redirected him, Paul continued on this trajectory for the rest of his life.
Scholars believe Paul was born sometime between 5 BC and 5 AD, and that he died around 64 or 67 AD. While he was a contemporary of Jesus, they never crossed paths—at least, not before Jesus died.
The first century was a tumultuous time for Christianity. The new religion was vulnerable, and it faced opposition everywhere from the Jews who believed it was blasphemy, and from the Romans who believed it challenged Caesar’s authority and created unrest. As a leader in the Jewish community, Paul saw the rapidly spreading Christian community as a threat, and he directly contributed to the persecution early Christians faced.
But after his encounter with Jesus, instead of stamping out Christianity, Paul stoked the flames of the faith wherever he went, at whatever the cost. More than any other person besides Jesus, Paul was the reason Christianity spread so far and so fast.
It’s a common misconception that Paul “used to be Saul,” and that when Jesus called him, he renamed him Paul. You may have heard something like “Saul the persecutor became Paul the persecuted.”
But there’s no verse that says that. And Paul and Saul are actually two versions of the same name.
Shortly after Saul converts to Christianity, Luke tells us he’s also called Paul (Acts 13:9), and for the most part the rest of the Bible refers to him as Paul. But Jesus doesn’t refer to him as Paul, and he was still called Saul 11 more times after his conversion.
It’s true that in the Old Testament, God occasionally changed people’s names (Abram became Abraham in Genesis 17:5, and Jacob became Israel in Genesis 32:28) to represent significant changes in their identity. But that’s not what happened here.
The reality is that Saul was a Hebrew name and Paul was a Greek version of the same name. (Similar to how “James” is the Greek form of “Jacob,” and “Judas” is the Greek form of “Judah.”) As Paul began to evangelize Greek communities (and since most of the New Testament was written in Greek), it makes sense that we see the Greek version of his name most after his conversion.
Of all the ways Paul affected Christianity, the biggest was arguably his role in spreading the gospel to non-Jewish communities. He certainly wasn’t the only apostle to do so, but he is known as the “apostle to the Gentiles” because that’s who Jesus specifically called him to minister to (Acts 9:15), he and the other apostles agreed that was his role (Galatians 2:7), and that was undeniably the focus of his ministry.
When Christianity emerged, it was often thought of as a Jewish sect—it built on Jewish teachings and beliefs, and because most Christians were also Jewish, many still followed Jewish customs and rituals established in the Law of Moses.
But Christianity was radically different from Judaism, and while many early Christians followed the Law, it wasn’t a prerequisite for believing in Jesus. The Law of Moses and the old covenant it bound them to had been replaced by Jesus’ new covenant, and the law of love (John 13:34-35).
For Paul, the apostles, and the early Christians, the Law (and specifically, circumcision) was one of the greatest theological issues of their day. First-century Jews had grown up believing the Law was central to their identity as God’s chosen people, and they struggled to fully grasp that Jesus rendered the Law obsolete (Hebrews 8:13).
Paul constantly wrote to Gentile Christians to tell them not to worry about circumcision (as you can imagine, uncircumcised adults were rightfully freaked out by the idea that they’d have to do this), and in Acts 15, the apostles met with Paul and Barnabas to officially settle the matter, because pockets of Jewish Christians were continuing to tell Gentiles to get circumcised.
Peter argued that God hadn’t discriminated between Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians because he’d given them both the Holy Spirit, and if in the entire history of Judaism no one had been able to keep the Law (except Jesus), then why would they put that burden on the Gentiles (Acts 15:7-11)?
After listening to everyone, the Apostle James concluded:
“ It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. For the law of Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath. ” —Acts 15:19–21
If you’ll notice, the apostles didn’t decide that Gentiles should follow “the most important” commandments, or the Big Ten, or anything like that. Instead, they essentially instructed Gentiles be culturally sensitive to their Jewish brothers and sisters, because the Law was respected and observed by Jews everywhere.
But despite the apostles’ agreement that Gentiles didn’t have to adopt Jewish customs to be Christian, Jewish Christians still saw law-observing Christians as superior, and even Peter let himself get pressured into playing favorites.
Paul wasn’t going to let that slide.
After he received a vision (Acts 10:9–16), Peter was one of the first apostles to specifically advocate for sharing the gospel with Gentiles. But as the Gentiles joined the church, Paul noticed that Peter still treated Gentile Christians differently in order to save face with those who still valued the law.
So Paul called him out on it.
“ When Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. For before certain men came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But when they arrived, he began to draw back and separate himself from the Gentiles because he was afraid of those who belonged to the circumcision group. The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy, so that by their hypocrisy even Barnabas was led astray. When I saw that they were not acting in line with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas in front of them all, ‘You are a Jew, yet you live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs? ‘We who are Jews by birth and not sinful Gentiles know that a person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law, because by the works of the law no one will be justified. ’” —Galatians 2:11–16
Paul goes on to say that “if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!” (Galatians 2:21). And as he explained earlier in his epistle to the Galatians, Peter, James, and John already agreed with him: the Gentiles did not need to follow the Law of Moses, and Jewish Christians were not better or superior than Gentile Christians because they did follow the Law.
Not a fun fact: Even though Paul argued that Christians didn’t need to be circumcised in Acts 15, he circumcised Timothy in the very next chapter “because of the Jews who lived in that area” (Acts 16:1–3).
Acts records three missionary journeys that took Paul throughout Asia Minor, Cyprus, Greece, Macedonia, and Syria. Some scholars argue there was a fourth missionary journey as well. In each of these, Paul and his companions set out to bring the gospel to Gentiles, and they establish the churches Paul wrote to in his epistles (as well as many others).
In some cases, Paul spent well over a year in the cities he preached to, living with the believers there and modeling a lifestyle of imitating Christ. Over the course of his life, Paul likely traveled well over 10,000 miles to spread the gospel.
Paul’s first journey began in Antioch with a calling from the Holy Spirit (Acts 13:2–3). He left the church with Barnabas and a man named John (also called Mark, believed to be the author of the Gospel of Mark ), and together they sailed to Cyprus , an island in the Mediterranean.
Here Paul performed his first miracle, perhaps inspired by his own conversion on the road to Damascus: he blinded a sorcerer who opposed their attempts to evangelize a proconsul (Acts 13:10–12).
Then they sailed to Perga in Pamphylia , where John Mark parted ways with Paul and Barnabas (this became a point of tension between Paul and Barnabas later). From there, Paul and Barnabas went to Psidion Antioch , a city in the mountains of Turkey.
In Psidion Antioch, Paul and Barnabas entered a synagogue during the Sabbath, and Paul preached the gospel to Jews and Gentiles alike. They were invited to come speak on the following Sabbath, and when they did, most of the city attended. Many of the Jews in attendance grew angry and tried to stop them, but the Gentiles were receptive to their message.Paul and Barnabas ultimately left Psidion Antioch due to persecution, and traveled to another Turkish city called Iconium . They spent “considerable time there” (Acts 14:3), and the city became increasingly divided: some Jews and Gentiles supported them, and others reviled them. Those who opposed Paul and Barnabas started a plot to stone them, but they caught wind of it and fled to the Lycaonian city of Lystra .
There, Paul performed another miracle: he healed a man who had been lame since birth (Acts 14:8-10). The people who saw this thought Paul and Barnabas were gods, and attempted to make sacrifices to them even as Paul and Barnabas tried to convince them not to.
Some of the people who opposed them in Psidion Antioch and Iconium followed them to Lystra , and they stirred up the crowd against them. They stoned Paul and left him for dead outside the city. Then he got up and went back in. The next day they left for Derbe , another Lycaonian city where they “won a large number of disciples” (Acts 14:21).
From Derbe , Paul and Barnabas looped back through the cities they’d already preached to, encouraging the new believers there and appointing elders for each church.
After staying in Antioch for awhile, Paul asked Barnabas to go with him to visit the churches they’d established together. Barnabas wanted to bring John Mark again, but Paul didn’t think John Mark should come since he’d abandoned them before. So Paul and Barnabas parted ways: Barnabas took John Mark to Cyprus , and Paul took a man named Silas to Syria and Cilicia .
Paul and Silas travelled through Derbe and then Lystra , where they picked up a believer named Timothy (this is the Timothy Paul writes to in 1 Timothy and 2 Timothy ). Together they traveled from town to town and told people what the apostles had decided at the Council of Jerusalem where James told Gentile Christians not to worry about circumcision, which was pretty ironic, because Paul had just circumcised Timothy (Acts 16:3).
The Holy Spirit kept Paul and his companions from preaching in the province of Asia , so they went to Phrygia and Galatia (where they planted the church Paul would later write to in Galatians ), eventually making their way to Troas .
Fun fact: “Asia” used to refer to a very specific region in part of what we know as Turkey today, but westerners began using the name to describe pretty much anything east of them, until they eventually used it for the whole continent.
Paul had a vision which led the group to Macedonia , and interestingly, here the author of Acts begins to include themself in the story “After Paul had seen the vision, we got ready at once to leave for Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to them” (Acts 16:10, emphasis added).
They wound their way through several provinces to arrive in Philippi , the main city in Macedonia . Here they met with a group of women, including a wealthy cloth dealer named Lydia. After they baptized Lydia and her household, she invited them to stay at her house. These were the first members of the church Paul writes to in Philippians .
During their time in Philippi , a spirit that possessed a local slave girl was bothering Paul, so he cast it out of her (Acts 16:18). Normally people are ecstatic when that happens, but the slave girl’s owners had been making money off of her because of the spirit , so they were pretty mad. They got everyone riled up against Paul and Silas and managed to convince the local authorities to have them beaten and imprisoned.
While Paul and Silas were in jail, there was an earthquake, and the prison doors opened and everyone’s chains came loose, but no one tried to escape. Paul and Silas shared the gospel with the jailer, and once they were freed, they returned to Lydia’s house, and then left for Thessalonica .
For three Sabbaths, Paul taught in the synagogues and established the group of believers that he would later write to in 1 Thessalonians and 2 Thessalonians . He gained many followers, but those who opposed him started a riot and threatened his supporters, so the believers sent him on to Berea .
The Berean Jews “received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true” (Acts 17:11). Unfortunately, some of those who opposed Paul and his companions in Thessalonica heard he was in Berea , so they came and started causing trouble. Paul left to Athens . Silas and Timothy stayed behind, but would catch up later.
The Athenians were accustomed to discussing new ideas, and they’d never heard the message Paul preached before, so they were intrigued and debated with him. Some of his listeners became believers, and then he left for Corinth .
Paul stayed in Corinth for a year and a half, preaching in the synagogues and gaining both Jewish and Gentile followers from a range of social statuses, forming the group of believers he would later write to in 1 Corinthians and 2 Corinthians . He stayed with two named Aquila and Priscilla, who were tentmakers, like him. Silas and Timothy rejoined him here.
The Jews who opposed Paul tried to bring charges against him based on Jewish law, but the Roman proconsul wasn’t interested in hearing their case. Paul left with Priscilla and Aquila and journeyed to Ephesus .
In Ephesus , Paul went into the synagogue and reasoned with the Jews and promised to return if he could. Then he made his way back to Jerusalem and Antioch, where his second journey ended.
Paul began his third missionary journey by returning to Galatia and Phrygia , where he continued building up the churches he’d established.
From there, Paul traveled back to Ephesus , where he encountered some believers who weren’t familiar with the Holy Spirit, because they’d been taught by Apollos, who didn’t have a complete grasp of the gospel at the time.
Paul remained in Ephesus for more than two years, and during that time he transitioned from teaching in the synagogue to discussing the gospel in the lecture hall of Tyrannus. Acts records that “all the Jews and Greeks who lived in the province of Asia heard the word of the Lord” (Acts 19:10).
During this time, Paul did many miracles, and even things he touched were reported to have healed people (Acts 19:12). After a dangerous evil spirit claimed to know Jesus and Paul, people flocked to Paul and his followers and the church grew quickly.
Around this time, Paul decided to head to Jerusalem , so he journeyed through Macedonia and Achaia , and made plans to stop in Rome . Meanwhile, Ephesus was in uproar, because Christianity’s explosive growth had stifled businesses that relied on idol worship.
The city was on the brink of rioting, and Paul wanted to return to help his companions, but the city clerk managed to de-escalate the situation without him. (Which was a good thing, because those business owners were pretty mad at Paul, and they probably would’ve killed him.)
Paul spent three months in Greece , then returned to Macedonia to avoid some people who were plotting against him. In Troas (a city in Macedonia ), Paul was teaching in an upper room when a young man fell asleep and tumbled out the window, falling to his death. Paul revived him, then left.
In a rush to reach Jerusalem , Paul bounced from Troas to Assos , Mitylene , Chios , and finally Miletus , where he asked the elders from Ephesus to meet him. After encouraging them, he boarded a ship and returned to Jerusalem , even after numerous Christians warned him not to go there.
Some argue that Paul made a fourth missionary journey as well, since some of his letters refer to events and visits that may not be accounted for in Acts. This largely depends on whether Paul was imprisoned in Rome once, or twice, which his letters are ambiguous about.Paul suggested he would travel to Spain (Romans 15:24), but he provides no record of this journey in his letters. However, early church fathers claimed Paul did, in fact, travel to Spain.
In his letter to the Corinthians, first-century church father Clement of Rome said Paul “had gone to the extremity of the west,” which at the time presumably meant Spain. Fourth-century church father John of Chrysostom said “For after he had been in Rome, he returned to Spain, but whether he came thence again into these parts, we know not.” And Cyril of Jerusalem (also from the fourth century) wrote that Paul “carried the earnestness of his preaching as far as Spain.”
Still, scholars can’t be sure that Paul did make this fourth journey, as the primary sources for his other three journeys (Acts and the epistles) don’t give us an explicit account of it.
On many of Paul’s journeys, he travelled by boat. As you can imagine, boats weren’t nearly as safe in the first century—especially on long voyages. In his second letter to the Corinthians, which was likely written before his final trip to Jerusalem, Paul claims he was shipwrecked three times:
“ Three times I was beaten with rods. Once I was stoned. Three times I was shipwrecked; a night and a day I was adrift at sea; ” —2 Corinthians 11:25
There’s no other record of these wrecks in the epistles or in Acts, but Acts 27 does record a fourth shipwreck in far more detail. On Paul’s way to trial in Rome, his boat encounters a brutal storm and dangerous waters. The soldiers took drastic measures, but an angel spoke to Paul, and he encouraged and advised them along the way.
During his ministry, Paul made a lot of people mad. On six occasions in Acts, Jews and Gentiles alike made plans to murder him—and one of those times, they stoned him and left him for dead.
Only counting the times the Bible explicitly says they planned to kill him, not just attack or harm him, here they in sequential order.
Just after his conversion on the road to Damascus, Paul began preaching in the synagogues. After several days, people began planning to kill him, and they watched the city gates day and night. His followers smuggled him in and out of the city in a basket (Acts 9:23–25).
When Paul left Damascus, he went to Jerusalem and tried to join the disciples there. He began debating with Hellenistic Jews, and they tried to kill him, so the Christians took him to Caesarea an sent him home to Tarsus (Acts 9:26–30).
Paul and Barnabas spent a long time in Iconium, and the city was divided: some people supported them, and others hated them. Jews and Gentiles alike plotted to stone them, and when Paul and Barnabas found out, they fled to Lystra (Acts 14:4–6).
After Paul healed a man in Lystra, people thought he and Barnabas were the gods, Zeus and Hermes, and attempted to sacrifice to them. But then some Jews came from Antioch and Iconium, and convinced this crowd to actually stone Paul. They thought they killed him, so they left him outside the city gate. (He was still alive.) Then he and Barnabas left (Acts 14:8–20).
After Paul insulted the high priest and sparked an intense theological debate between the Sadducees and Pharisees, a group of more than 40 men took a vow not to eat or drink until they killed Paul (Acts 23:12–13).
Their plan was to have a centurion send Paul to the Sanhedrin for questioning, and then kill him on the way. But someone warned the centurion of the plan, and instead, he rounded up nearly 500 soldiers to take Paul to the governor in Caesarea.
Years later, Paul was still being held prisoner, and there was a new proconsul named Porcius Festus was in charge. Paul’s accusers requested that Paul be sent back to Jerusalem “for they were preparing an ambush to kill him along the way” (Acts 25:3).
Festus refused, and told them to make their case in Caesarea, where Paul used his privilege as a Roman citizen to make a bold request.
When Paul was first imprisoned in Caesarea, he made his appeal to Governor Felix, then waited two years in prison with no progress. (Governor Felix strung him along because he wanted the Jews to like him, and he hoped Paul would bribe him.)
Porcius Festus succeeded Felix and after hearing Paul defend himself, he asked Paul if would be willing to stand trial in Jerusalem.
Tired of his case dragging on to appease his Jewish accusers, Paul claimed his right as a Roman to appeal to Caesar:
“ I am now standing before Caesar’s court, where I ought to be tried. I have not done any wrong to the Jews, as you yourself know very well. If, however, I am guilty of doing anything deserving death, I do not refuse to die. But if the charges brought against me by these Jews are not true, no one has the right to hand me over to them. I appeal to Caesar!” After Festus had conferred with his council, he declared: “You have appealed to Caesar. To Caesar you will go! ” —Acts 25:10–12
Unfortunately, the Book of Acts ends before Paul’s trial before Caesar. But before he leaves Caesarea, another ruler—King Herod Agrippa II—hears his case, and tells Festus:
“ This man could have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar. ” —Acts 26:32
Perhaps Paul hoped appealing to Caesar would finally put an end to his case, but unfortunately, it dragged them out even further.
Or . . . perhaps it was a strategic move on Paul’s part to testify about Christ to the leaders of the Roman empire. Having Caesar’s court and the Roman justice system as his captive audience might have been Paul’s play all along.
By appealing to Caesar, Paul forced Festus to send him to Rome to await trial. When he finally arrived, “Paul was allowed to live by himself, with a soldier to guard him” (Acts 28:16). Here, Paul preached freely to the Jews in Rome for two years. Scholars believe this is likely when he wrote his letter to the Philippians , because he references being in chains (Philippians 1:12–13).
The Book of Acts ends with Paul under house arrest, and we don’t learn much more about the situation from the epistles, and scholars debate about whether or not Paul was ever released from house arrest. Some argue that his letters speak of his imprisonment in the past tense and make references to things that could have only occurred after his house arrest.
For example, in 2 Timothy (believed to have been written shortly before his death) he appears to reference a recent trip to Troas (2 Timothy 4:13), which would’ve been impossible if he’d already been imprisoned in Caesarea for more than two years before his house arrest in Rome.
Whether or not Paul made a fourth missionary journey (possibly to Spain) largely depends on if he was imprisoned in Rome once or twice.
The Apostle Paul is traditionally considered the author of 13 books of the New Testament . While Moses still holds the title for writing the most words in the Bible (traditionally), Paul wrote the most documents . (Well, unless you count each individual Psalm as a document, in which case David wins .) The books attributed to him include:
These books are actually letters—or epistles—which were written to churches Paul planted and people he presumably encountered on the missionary journeys we see in the Book of Acts. The letters reference many of the events recorded in Acts, which scholars have used to construct more clear timelines of Paul’s life and ministry.
But not everyone agrees that Paul wrote all of these letters. Most scholars (critical and conservative) believe that Paul did write seven of them: Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, and Philemon. But the remaining six letters have raised some questions, and scholars debate whether or not they can really be attributed to Paul.
Colossians makes some questionable references which Paul doesn’t make anywhere else (he calls Jesus “the image of the invisible God” in Colossians 1:15), and which align more with later Christian theology (like that found in John’s gospel ), so some have argued it was written by Paul’s followers after his death.
Ephesians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, and Titus all have very different styles than Paul’s other letters. This could mean Paul simply had a different purpose in writing them, or that Paul’s writing style changed over the course of his ministry, but the epistles to Timothy and Titus also have very different vocabulary and even theology than we see in other Pauline writings.
Many Christians would be surprised to learn that these academic debates are even happening, because these letters are all signed by Paul. But scholars argue that these epistles are actually pseudepigrapha : writings that claim to be written by someone who was not the actual author.
Some pseudepigrapha is harmless, produced out of convenience, necessity, or accepted practices of the time (such as a student writing on behalf of a teacher, with the approval and authority of the teacher). Others, like many of the Gnostic gospels , were blatant forgeries written to advance a theological position.
At worst, someone wrote these letters and deceitfully signed Paul’s name to make them more authoritative. But many scholars believe it’s more likely that Paul asked his companions to write them, told them what to write, and signed his name. This would explain differences in style and vocabulary without really losing the letters’ authenticity.
Almost all scholars today agree that Paul didn’t write Hebrews, and the true biblical author remains unknown. However, the early church assumed the letter was written by Paul, and even included it in early collections of his writings. This was contested as early as the second and third centuries, but for more than a millennia the church largely believed Paul wrote it.
Early Christian writers even suggested possible alternative authors. Tertullian (c. 155–240 AD) proposed that it was written by Barnabas. Hippolytus (c. 170–235 AD) believed it was Clement of Rome .
The father of church history, Eusebius of Caesarea (c. 260–339 AD) noted that “some have rejected the Epistle to the Hebrews, saying that it is disputed by the church of Rome, on the ground that it was not written by Paul” ( Church History ). But he himself held the view that Paul wrote the letter in Hebrew and simply chose not to sign it, and then Luke translated it to Greek.
Today, it’s not really even up for debate. Donald Guthrie wrote in his New Testament Introduction that “most modern writers find more difficulty in imagining how this Epistle was ever attributed to Paul than in disposing of the theory.”
We will likely never know who really wrote Hebrews. But we can be pretty confident that it wasn’t Paul.
The Bible doesn’t tell us how Paul died, but numerous early church fathers wrote that he was martyred—specifically, he was beheaded, probably by emperor Nero, which would mean it had to be sometime before 68 AD.
Clement of Rome provided the earliest surviving record of Paul’s death in his letter to the Corinthians (known as 1 Clement), where he mentions that Paul and Peter were martyred.
An apocryphal work from the second century known as The Acts of Paul says that Nero had Paul decapitated. And in 200 AD, Tertullian wrote that Paul’s death was like John the Baptist’s (decapitation). Other early Christian writers support these claims and provide some additional details like where it happened (Rome) and where he was buried (the Ostian Way at Rome).
In 2002, archaeologists found a large marble sarcophagus near the location Jerome and Caius described. It had “ PAULO APOSTOLO MART ” (Paul apostle martyr) written on it. No one ever opened the sarcophagus, but using a probe and carbon dating, archaeologists estimated that the remains inside were from the first or second century. The Vatican claims these are in fact the remains of Saint Paul, the Apostle to the Gentiles.
From the moment he became a believer in Christ, Paul’s life was transformed. While Jesus didn’t give Saul a new name, he did give him a new purpose: one that redefined his life. Instead of persecuting Christians, Paul was called to be persecuted as one of them.
Despite never witnessing Jesus’ ministry, Paul arguably contributed more to the growth of the Christian movement than any other apostle. He laid the foundation for missions work that has continued around the world today, and through his life he modeled evangelism, discipleship, perseverance, and suffering—for the Christians who knew him, and for every believer today.
We create research-based articles and handy infographics to help people understand the Bible.
Join our email list, and we’ll send you some of our best free resources—plus we’ll tell you whenever we make something new.
11 comments.
It’s Sunday morning and my grandson Paul is on his honeymoon. He is named after his great grandfather my dad a caring man that touch many lives especially young boys trough being a Boy Scout master for over forty years. As I sat here this morning thinking of my grandson Paul I decided I wanted to learn more about Paul in the Bible that he was named after through generations and I must say I have not only learned a great deal but your writing style was wonderful even though some of the parts of his life pulled at my heart I then focused on all the amazing things he did to serve our awesome God! A new found reader, Paul’s Mima
Thank you for such an informative piece of writing and breaking down of scriptures, with supporting ref’s. This has help me understand and see the word in a different light, especially Paul’s works.
Absolutely love it.
Thanks, keep up the good work.
There is no book of Paul just his letters, however it is very clear that God used him as a post disciple of Christ Jesus to solidify the truth. Paul’s truth moves us into Revelations as the Church of Ephesus is taken into account of the last days. My fellow Christians we are to ensure other Christians to live up to our heavenly calling.
What a wonderful synopsis of Paul. I am enthralled.
As a GA in my teens I wrote and mapped Paul’s Missionary Journeys. Wonderful maps. I will have to reread this several times to add to my thinking and understanding. Paul was born a Jew with Roman citizenship. He had an elite education. Like his father he was a Pharisee but grafted into Christianity through conversion. Love the name clarification:Paul and Saul. Excellent information in a very understandable way.
I like the map you two put together; it’s clean and crisp looking, and very helpful with where the pertinent towns and country locations. I’m in the process of putting together a book about the three Pastorals and was wondering if you might allow me to use your map as the book cover (front and back – wraparound cover). I would, of course, give you credit for having created the map – cover sheet. I’m just brain-storming here, with you, I’ve been thinking about using such a cover sheet for some time now, and your map just strikes me as being the best one I’ve seen.
Please get back with me, even if you’re not interested in my idea, Thank you, Robin Riley
Glad you like the maps! You’re welcome to include them in a blog post or even a figure within your book with attribution, but we don’t want these to be used as a book cover. If you like the style, you’re also welcome to connect with the artist (Liz Donovan) on dribble or via email.
Dribbble: https://dribbble.com/lizlovesdesign Email: [email protected]
I really enjoyed your history of Pauls life , ministry , journeys etc ,. I am excited to see what you give us next …
Some sources might help your case there, friend.
For my part, I’m not surprised that it would take some time to go from “breathing out murderous threats against the Lord’s disciples” (Acts 9:1) to risking your own murder for the sake of making disciples. That’s a huge shift—even a three-year turnaround sounds pretty speedy to me. Just overcoming the feelings of guilt alone would be a time-consuming undertaking.
Thank you so much for the Interesting history of Paul and the guide God bless you
That is a rather good summary … Well Done!
Thanks very much for the guide
Although St. Paul was not one of the original 12 Apostles of Jesus , he was one of the most prolific contributors to the New Testament . Of the 27 books in the New Testament, 13 or 14 are traditionally attributed to Paul, though only 7 of these Pauline epistles are accepted as being entirely authentic and dictated by St. Paul himself. The authorship of the others is debated, and they are commonly thought to have come from contemporary or later followers writing in Paul’s name. These authors likely used material from his surviving letters and may have even had access to letters written by him that no longer survive. Read on to learn which Biblical books St. Paul is known to have authored and which ones he probably did not write himself.
The sixth book of the New Testament, the Letter of Paul to the Romans , was written by St. Paul while he was in Corinth about 57 CE. It was addressed to the Christian church at Rome, whose congregation he hoped to visit for the first time on his way to Spain. The epistle is the longest and doctrinally most significant of St. Paul’s writings and is more of a theological treatise than a letter. In it he acknowledges the unique religious heritage of the Jews (prior to his conversion, Paul was a Jewish Pharisee ) but asserts that righteousness no longer comes through the Mosaic Law but through Christ .
The First Letter of Paul to the Corinthians and the Second Letter of Paul to the Corinthians were both written by St. Paul. The first letter was probably written about 53–54 CE at Ephesus and addresses some of the problems that arose in the new Christian community that he had established in Corinth during his initial missionary visit (c. 50–51). The second letter was written from Macedonia about 55 CE and applauds the Corinthians’ response to his first letter and reaffirms his apostolic authority. The letters deal with a church of Gentile Christians and are therefore the best evidence of how St. Paul operated on Gentile territory.
The Letter of Paul to the Galatians , the ninth book of the New Testament, was authored by St. Paul. The letter was likely written between 53–54 CE and addresses division within the Christian community about whether new converts needed to be circumcised and follow the prescriptions of the Mosaic Law. He reaffirms his teaching that Jewish law is no longer the exclusive path to righteousness and argues that Christians have a new freedom in Christ. The letter is very forceful and specific in dealing with the problems concerned and is the only epistle without kindly ingression, thanksgiving, or personal greetings appended to the final blessings.
Although the Letter of Paul to the Ephesians has been attributed to St. Paul, it is more likely the work of one of his disciples. Scholars think the letter was probably written before 90 CE and that the author consulted St. Paul’s letter to the Colossians as a reference. Of the 155 verses in Ephesians, 73 have verbal parallels with Colossians. When parallels to genuine Pauline letters are added, 85 percent of Ephesians is duplicated elsewhere. This and several other contested letters are usually designated as “deuter-Pauline epistles” to indicate that they were probably written by St. Paul’s followers after his death.
The Letter of Paul to the Philippians is believed to have been written by St. Paul while he was in prison, probably at Rome about 62 CE. According to several scholars, the canonical work is likely a later collection of fragments of Paul’s correspondence with the congregation in Philippi. Apprehensive that his execution was close at hand, yet hoping somehow to visit the Philippians again, St. Paul explains that he welcomes death for Jesus’ sake but is equally concerned to continue his apostolate.
The authorship of the Letter of Paul to the Colossians is debated. For some scholars, the developed theology of the letter indicates that it was composed by St. Paul during his imprisonment in Rome about 62 CE. Others question Pauline authorship on the basis of the distinctive vocabulary and suggest that it is a deuter-Pauline epistle, written by Paul’s followers after his death. Given its similarities to the Letter of Paul to Philemon , some have suggested that a later Paulinist simply changed details to meet a different situation.
The first Letter of Paul to the Thessalonians was likely written by St. Paul from Corinth about 50 CE. However, the second letter is possibly deuter-Pauline in origin, though this is debated. Second Thessalonians is obviously an imitation of the style of First Thessalonians but seems to reflect a later time. Additionally, given that there is notable ambiguity about the proximity of Christ’s Second Coming , its authorship by St. Paul is doubted.
Neither of the two Letters of Paul to Timothy are thought to have been written by St. Paul. Linguistic facts—such as short connectives, particles, and other syntactical peculiarities; use of different words for the same things; and repeated unusual phrases otherwise not used by Paul—offer fairly conclusive evidence against Pauline authorship and authenticity. Both epistles are usually considered “trito-Pauline,” meaning that they were probably written by members of the Pauline school a generation after his death, likely between 80 and 100 CE.
The authorship of the Letter of Paul to Titus is disputed. Given many of the similarities in content and style to the two Letters of Paul to Timothy, it is possible that this work is also a trito-Pauline epistle, written a generation after the death of St. Paul. In fact, the three letters together are often called Pastoral Letters, as they were written to instruct and admonish the recipients in their pastoral office rather than to address the specific problems of congregations like many of the other Pauline epistles.
The Letter of Paul to Philemon was probably composed by St. Paul in a Roman prison about 61 CE, though some sources date it earlier. The brief epistle was written to Philemon, a wealthy Christian of Colossae, on behalf of Onesimus, Philemon’s former slave. While passing no judgment on slavery itself, Paul exhorts Philemon to manifest true Christian love that removes barriers between slaves and free people.
While the Letter to the Hebrews has traditionally been ascribed to St. Paul, the work does not contain a salutation with the name of the author. The book is still included in the Pauline corpus in the East but not in the West. Given that the thoughts, metaphors, and ideas of Hebrews are distinct from the rest of the New Testament , most scholars doubt that it was written by St. Paul or his followers. Various authors have been suggested over the ages, and it is possible that the work was composed by a Jewish convert among the second generation of Christians suffering persecution.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The drama of a novel meets scholarship in leading Christian biographer John Pollock's classic work about one of the most transforming persons in history: the apostle Paul.
The Apostle masterfully combines careful adherence to biblical text, detailed research, and a storyteller's gift to create a book equally relevant for both casual readers fascinated by Paul's life and serious biblical scholars. Pollock begins his fast-movig narrative with Stephen's death and follows Paul through his conversion, missionary journeys, and eventual execution. Many will enjoy it simply as a satisfying and insightful true-life story, although maps and a study guide allow for deeper exploration. The Apostle was originally published in 1969, and this new edition marks the first significant revision in many years.
About the author.
John Pollock was one of the preeminent Christian biographers of his generation. Over four million copies of his books have been sold in English alone, works that covered the lives of Hudson Taylor, William Wilberforce, and John Wesley. He also wrote The Master: A Life of Jesus , and served as Billy Graham's official biographer. John and his wife Anne traveled widely in many parts of the world for the purposes of research.
John charles pollock.
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews.
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..
Apostle Paul wrote 13 books of the New Testament
Recommended: Amazing Bible Facts And Statistics
List Of All Books Of The Bible And Their Authors
Complete List of Apostle Paul’s Prayers In The Bible
List Of Names In The Bible & Meaning From A To Z
10 comments.
This is really nice.
This is lovely
This is amazing
That’s marvelous
This page is inspiring. Thank you.
Comment: please i need to go to school of bible
That really nice
I like this cause it inspires me
Editor picks.
Popular posts.
Popular category.
Subscribe for full access to The Hollywood Reporter
Paul mccartney will hate their new beatles book (almost as much as he hated their last one).
'All You Need Is Love' authors Steven Gaines and Peter Brown come together for a dishy conversation about their 40-years-in-the-making best-selling sequel to their 1983 landmark Beatles history 'The Love You Make.'
By Maer Roshan
Forty-one years ago, they published the biggest Beatles biography of all time — The Love You Make , which spent three months in 1983 atop the New York Times best-seller list. The book would make its co-authors — former Circus magazine editor and author of 13 best-sellers Steven Gaines and onetime Brian Epstein protégé and Fab Four confidant Peter Brown — into the most famous Beatle-ologists on the planet.
John lennon's long-lost guitar fetches record $2.85m at times square auction, kevin macdonald to direct john lennon, yoko ono documentary (exclusive).
As it happens, Gaines and Brown aren’t quite finished with The Beatles yet. Last month, after decades of steering clear of the subject, they released All You Need Is Love: The Beatles in Their Own Words , an oral history of the Mop Tops based on hundreds of hours of old taped interviews Gaines and Brown conducted while researching their original history, including conversations with McCartney, Ringo Starr , George Harrison , Yoko Ono, Cynthia Lennon and scores of others.
The Hollywood Reporter sat down with the two old friends and colleagues for a long and winding discussion about their new book (which hovered on top of Amazon’s best-seller list for a month even before it was published), about how they dealt with the criticism of their old one and about their theory explaining why McCartney hated it so much (something involving venereal disease and sheep).
Your first book was a huge success — it’s considered the definitive Beatle book. Why, 40 years later, write a follow-up?
STEVEN GAINES Well, I mean, there’s so much interest in The Beatles. It never ended. And I realized that although The Love You Make is the biggest-selling book about The Beatles ever — it sold over 500,000 copies — there was still more to the story. And we had all these tapes of all the interviews we had from the first book. We tried to decide what to do. Can we let people hear them? But it turned out it’s against the law to play somebody’s recorded voice [without permission]. So, we couldn’t do that. And so I came up with the idea of maybe it would be OK if we just transcribe the tapes and turn the transcriptions into a book.
GAINES We’ve been seeing each other 40 years. Wait, it’s been 40 years since we wrote the book together. It’s 50 years since Peter and I met.
Peter, you were involved with The Beatles from the beginning, when you worked for Brian Epstein. You even went on tour with them in the 1960s, right? What was that like?
PETER BROWN When we were going around the world doing gigs, we still got on commercial planes. Nobody in that era had their own private planes.
Wait, The Beatles flew on commercial jets? Along with regular passengers?
GAINES Amazing, huh?
Did they get mobbed on these planes or did people keep their distance?
BROWN Not on the plane. But there would be crowds of girls and boys waiting for the plane. Thousands and thousands of kids waiting for them to get off the plane. It was just crazy. That had never happened before.
GAINES Tell him about Manila. Weren’t you beaten up by Imelda Marcos’ goons during that tour?
GAINES They called them “orphans” and “disabled kids” …
BROWN And the news was all about how rude The Beatles had been to these children and to the president’s wife by not showing up at this party. So, the next day, when we woke up, all our hotel facilities had been cut off. There was no breakfast, no maid service. We were just told to go to the airport. And when we got to the airport, there were all these angry people. And all these police. And they just kept checking our passports and keeping us from boarding the plane. We didn’t think we’d be able to leave Manila. But we finally got onto the plane and got away.
That’s a crazy story. So, why do you think, all these years later, there’s still so much interest in The Beatles? What was it about them that was so special?
GAINES First of all, it was the music. The music caught on. It was joyous. It was fun. At first they were just a pop group. But the way they dressed, their thoughts, their ideas …
BROWN You’re too young to know this, but the thing is that in the Western world, particularly in the United States [in the early 1960s], there wasn’t anything new and cool. There were the Black artists, but they weren’t acceptable. And then you had a lot of white people who were not very interesting. And that was not just in the United States. It was everywhere. And somehow or other, The Beatles came along.
The Love You Make was obviously a huge best-seller, but you also took a lot of heat for it, a lot of criticism for supposedly betraying The Beatles.
GAINES On Peter’s behalf, they say in journalism, if you lived it, you own it. And Peter lived it. Peter lived every single second of this. I mean, he was part of it. And he deserved to tell the story as much as anybody did. So the criticism was very unfair. None of them have any right to say that Peter betrayed them. He absolutely did not. It’s his life, too.
Was there a point, Peter, while you were doing that book, when you realized some of these people were going to be mad at you?
BROWN No, I don’t think I did at all. I mean, the thing is these are famous people. They’ve been around a long time. They’re grown-up people, and they survived very, very well. I thought that what we were doing was telling the truth.
And yet Paul allegedly responded by burning the book .
BROWN Paul was always a drama queen. I don’t know. I can’t remember the details of it. He didn’t make a big fuss about it until later. I mean, he was a close friend of mine. I introduced him — although he says this is not true — to his wife, Linda. She was a friend of mine and she wanted to be a photographer. She came to see me and showed me her portfolio of the pictures that she’d been taking. There was a lot of pictures of The Rolling Stones, really beautiful pictures.
John Lennon , though, would not have been angry. John Lennon didn’t have any secrets. He lived his life very, very openly. When he had trouble with heroin, he wrote a song called “Cold Turkey.” There were no secrets in John’s life. Paul lived in a kind of bubble and wanted everybody to love him, and he is lovable and wonderful and all the rest. But John wouldn’t have cared at all. And I bet you that if John was alive, he wouldn’t have been angry at all.
Even about the part where you talk about his supposed sexual affair with Brian Epstein, you don’t think he would’ve been upset about that?
GAINES Yeah, sure. I bet you he would’ve been upset back in Liverpool. He got into a fist fight with another guy [over the rumors of a bisexual tryst with Epstein]. But now, this year, I mean, believe you me, he wouldn’t have been the least bitter. But here’s the thing, when we published that book back in 1984, there still wasn’t the openness and understanding and education. So, it was a very explosive thing to write. But I’m sure if we had published this for the first time now, people would kind of just shrug.
So are there things in the new book that are going to shock or offend anyone? Are you bracing for a second round of controversy?
BROWN I think we put together the truth, this is what it is. And I don’t think for a minute that any sensible, grown-up person will think that’s inappropriate.
BROWN I feel very strongly that there’s nothing inappropriate about what we’ve done. We have, in fact, tried very carefully to tell a story, which millions of people in different parts of the world are fascinated about. They’re all fascinated by The Beatles and by the details of their lives. But this book is not going to offend any sensible person. I think that it’s rather unique and we’ve done our best. We’ve tried to make sure that everything we’ve written is accurate.
GAINES Everything that they did or said, what meal they ate on a certain day, has become part of history. Everything is so important about them. And it isn’t just a small cult. There’s millions and millions of fans who know everything. So, I think for some of those to find out the things people disagreed about the way things happened and the order that they happened in, I think that will be fascinating to them. I think when they hear how Paul, George and Ringo really felt about John Lennon, that will be fascinating. So, I don’t think the book is going to be without controversy, but it’s certainly not because of anything Peter and I wrote or did.
When you say how they felt about Lennon — how did they feel?
But he was a leader who turned his back on them, right?
GAINES It all fell apart. You can’t blame anybody. Everything was happening. Yoko came into it. John and Paul weren’t getting along. Brian had died. He was really the glue that kept them together. So, it was nobody’s fault, it really wasn’t. As Ringo says, “It was time for it to end.”
Ringo and Paul have announced they’re going to go on tour together. Good or bad idea?
GAINES What do you think, Peter?
BROWN I think it’s rather sweet. It’s probably because they’re rather fond of each other.
GAINES I think they should leave it alone. I honestly think that they should leave it alone. People will have fun. They’ll be entertaining and everything. But as far as the legend goes, it is a legend.
A rare moment of disagreement between the authors.
GAINES Trust me, darling, not so rare.
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day
Alyson hannigan “was freaking out” when she heard the ‘american pie’ reference in taylor swift’s “so high school”, howard university revokes sean “diddy” combs’ honorary degree following release of cassie assault video, ray j ponders whether sex tape with kim kardashian altered the course of humanity, hermès chooses new york city to stage first u.s. fashion show, rob schneider booted mid-set from another stage after attendees walk out, ariana grande stalks penn badgley in “the boy is mine” music video, featuring brandy and monica.
Share this article
Reminder, this is a Premium article and requires a subscription to read.
Paul Lewis is a veteran sports journalist who has written four books and covered Rugby World Cups, America’s Cups, Olympic & Commonwealth Games and more.
Could the All Blacks adopt a more conservative style for their first big assignment of the winter, England ?
One of the key principles of rugby coaching has always been: to decide what style of rugby you want your team to play, and then select the players to execute it. The All Blacks of recent years have persisted largely with a get-it-wide philosophy (although there has been plenty of kicking), based on retaining possession and using it quickly – “earning the right to go wide”, as the saying goes.
The urge not just to win but to win attractively still looms large in the national coaching and playing psyche; it is a signature element of New Zealand rugby. But it can also play into the hands of those who prepare the right way; the All Blacks have sometimes struggled against teams who back their defence and attack the All Blacks’ set piece and breakdowns; game plans based on pressure.
When Scott Robertson comes to populate his 32-man squad next month, there may be a lot to be said for adopting the same kind of style Vern Cotter has imbued at the much-improved Blues this season.
Regardless of what happens from this point (seasoned Blues fans are all too familiar with end-of-season disappointment), Cotter’s old-school, it-all-starts-up-front approach has paid dividends for a franchise previously struggling to live up to a long-held philosophy of expansive rugby.
The unspoken doctrine: we have big, fast, creative backs who can rip opponents apart and we play to our strengths. Much effort went into directing ball to attackers who sometimes fell foul of defences who knew what was coming and channelled their own style of play to upset the Blues’ set pieces, the breakdowns and hitting them on the counter.
Sound familiar? The Crusaders did it for years; a couple of weeks ago, they did it again.
Ironically, there have been several instances when under-pressure All Blacks reverted to the same sort of basic pick-and-go, driving and maul play Cotter has made commonplace at the Blues. Two tests against England in 2019 and 2018 come to mind – the former a World Cup semifinal loss and the latter a narrow win after being 15-0 down after 23 minutes.
On both occasions, they looked good as they built pressure when faced with defences starving their normal attacking game of oxygen. It was short-lived. Grinding away, wrestling over the goal line and kicking the goals is not what makes All Blacks happy boys – and there is a partially valid theory that it is playing the sort of game the likes of England prefer.
It may not be pretty but it can be undeniably effective, as Cotter and the Blues have shown. Here’s a small list of what this flinty, no-nonsense approach has achieved for the Blues:
Robertson will likely be keen to install a Crusaders-like efficiency, resilience and the same know-how-to-win ability displayed over seven successful years.
History suggests England will bring a strong pack but will be less capable in the backs. England coach Steve Borthwick announces his final squad next week and, though his selections to this point have been conservative, his training squad contains a lot of youth – ball-running players like Fijian-born lock Rusi Tuima and Tongan-born loose forward Greg Fisilau, among others.
There are also young back three players new to this part of the world, like Immanuel Feyi-Waboso, Tom Roebuck and Ollie Sleightholme, though none have yet been named in the final touring party.
All Black great Dan Carter believes there are many signs England is interested in a trend towards more ball-playing forwards, turnover-adept loose forwards and more penetrative backs: “I thought they played good tournament rugby to get as far as they did through the World Cup. There was a lot of risk-free rugby, they’re looking to expand and grow that and they’ve definitely got the talent there.
“Now it’s about being willing to continue to play with the ball more … an exciting and attacking style of play I’m sure a lot of their players would love to be a part of.”
Interestingly, they are short of depth at tighthead prop and, if England do loose their own shackles touring here, a forward-oriented approach from the All Blacks could be a smart move, particularly if the All Blacks involve a new lock or locks because of the shortage in those ranks.
It would be a brave move – Robertson knows fans also want to win but do so with style. However, if England do chance their arm a little, it may allow him to form a game plan based on forward grunt, defensive vigilance and counter-attack.
Paul Lewis has been a journalist since the last ice age . Sport has been a lifetime pleasure and part of a professional career during which he has written four books, and covered Rugby World Cups, America’s Cups, Olympic & Commonwealth Games and more.
Dean Bell and ex-All Black Craig Innes have opened up about their time with Leeds.
Northwestern Law Journal des Refusés, Vol. 1, No. 1, Art. 2.
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 24-13
38 Pages Posted: 31 May 2024
Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law
Date Written: May 29, 2024
This essay argues for an end to law's infamously Byzantine and bloated citation manual, the Bluebook. The very features that make the Bluebook distinctive when compared to citation systems in other academic fields are also those that inflict vast amounts of unnecessary if not downright harmful labor on its users. The root of the problem is its obsolescence: the Bluebook was designed for a system in which legal scholarship was primarily consumed in print and for material where the doctrinal epistemology of authority predominated. Today, legal scholarship is primarily consumed electronically, and it largely shares an epistemology of credence with other scholarly disciplines. (Nor are its hundreds of pages of rules particularly useful for practicing lawyers and judges, who sensibly disregard most of it anyway.) At a minimum, the signals, typographical rules, abbreviations, and cross-references need to be put out of their misery; when those are gone what is left would be practically indistinguishable from the sensible citation systems of other fields, as it should be. Also, we should automate as much as possible---and that turns out to be quite a lot.
Keywords: bluebook, law reviews, citations, legal writing, legal education, legal research, bibliography
JEL Classification: K10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Northwestern university - pritzker school of law ( email ).
375 E. Chicago Ave Chicago, IL 60611 United States
Paper statistics, related ejournals, northwestern university pritzker school of law, public law & legal theory research paper series.
Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
3. Letter of Paul to the Galatians. Galatians is the ninth book of the New Testament and was written by Paul at around 47 AD. In this letter, Paul addressed the question that had arisen about whether new converts needed to be circumcised and obey the Mosaic Law to become true Christians.
The author was a friend of Timothy's (Heb. 13:23), as was Paul. However, the predominant view among scholars is that Hebrews was likely written by someone other than Paul. While the author is unknown, many propose it could have been Barnabas, Apollos, or another leader in the early church.
Paul began most of his letters with a similar greeting to the one found in the letter to the church of Galatia, "Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ" ( Galatians 1:3 ). The thirteen books written by Paul are: Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 and 2 Thessalonians, 1 ...
We know for certain that Paul wrote at least thirteen letters that are included in the New Testament. Scholars have debated whether or not Hebrews was written by Paul; if Paul wrote Hebrews, that would make his total contribution to the Bible fourteen books. The following is a breakdown of the letters Paul wrote and the possible timeframes in ...
It is the first Letter that Paul wrote from prison and can be dated to A.D. 56, although others place it with the Letters of Paul's Roman captivity between A.D. 61 and 63. We know that Paul was imprisoned more than once. —Galatians: A fiery Letter to a Church in full crisis; probably written in A.D. 56 or 57.
The Pauline epistles, also known as Epistles of Paul or Letters of Paul, are the thirteen books of the New Testament attributed to Paul the Apostle, although the authorship of some is in dispute.Among these epistles are some of the earliest extant Christian documents. They provide an insight into the beliefs and controversies of early Christianity.As part of the canon of the New Testament ...
12. Titus (67 A.D.) Written from Ephesus Second Roman Imprisonment (68 A.D.) 13. 2 Timothy (68 A.D.) Written from Rome It is believed by many that Paul wrote the book of Hebrews. If in fact he did, that would bring to 14 the total number of books of the New Testament written by this great soldier of the cross. "I Paul have written it
Paul's an important character: out of the 27 books in the New Testament, Paul wrote 13. Out of all the biblical human authors, Paul has written the most books of the Bible. Paul was chosen for a few specific tasks (Eph 3:8-9): Preach Christ to the Gentiles; Convey God's plan for managing the church; We see Paul doing the first in the book ...
The Book of Titus. Written around A.D. 62to 64 during Paul's fourth missionary trip was written to Timothy, probably a Gentile convert, about how churches are to be organized and structured ...
The Pauline Epistles are the 13 letters written by the apostle Paul that are included in the canon of Scripture. The Pauline Epistles are Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, and Philemon. The Pauline Epistles contain much of the ...
The Life of Paul Books Written: Historical Events: AD 4 Augustus adopts Tiberius and recognizes him as the successor c. 5 Born—an Israelite—in Tarsus of Cilicia (Acts 22:3; Phil 3:5) ...
The Pauline Epistles—or the Epistles of Paul—were letters written to the early Church by the apostle Paul. God preserved many of those letters for us as books of the Bible. These ancient epistles contain valuable insight into modern-day Christian living, while also providing us a snapshot of the early Christian Church.
The Pauline epistles are the thirteen books in the New Testament traditionally attributed to Paul the Apostle.. There is strong consensus in modern New Testament scholarship on a core group of authentic Pauline epistles whose authorship is rarely contested: Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, and Philemon.Several additional letters bearing Paul's name are ...
post a comment ». 102 books based on 4 votes: Paul: A Biography by N.T. Wright, St. Paul: The Apostle We Love to Hate by Karen Armstrong, Paul Was Not a Christian: The Ori...
Save those for later. Paul's letters came first. Although many letters in the New Testament are claimed to have been written by Paul, most scholars who have studied them have reached the conclusion that only seven of the letters were actually written by Paul when he lived in the early 1 century, around 20 to 30 years after the death of Jesus.
The apostle Paul wrote thirteen books of the New Testament. Here is a quick overview of each book. Key Points: Romans: This is Paul's masterpiece where he explains the deep need all of us have to be made right with God, and the fact that this is only possible through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross. 1 Corinthians: Paul points out ...
These books are actually letters—or epistles—which were written to churches Paul planted and people he presumably encountered on the missionary journeys we see in the Book of Acts. The letters reference many of the events recorded in Acts, which scholars have used to construct more clear timelines of Paul's life and ministry.
Saint Paul the Apostle, one of the early Christian leaders, often considered to be the most important person after Jesus in the history of Christianity. Of the 27 books of the New Testament, 13 are traditionally attributed to Saint Paul, though several may have been written by his disciples.
1) Paul commends Phoebe as a servant of the church in Cenchreae, Corinth's eastern seaport (who probably carried the letter to the Romans) 16:1-2. 2) Paul sends greetings from Gaius in whose house he was staying who may well have been the same Gaius mentioned in 1 Corinthians 1:14 as the one whom Paul baptized in Corinth 16:23.
The Letter of Paul to the Galatians, the ninth book of the New Testament, was authored by St. Paul. The letter was likely written between 53-54 CE and addresses division within the Christian community about whether new converts needed to be circumcised and follow the prescriptions of the Mosaic Law. He reaffirms his teaching that Jewish law ...
The Apostle masterfully combines careful adherence to biblical text, detailed research, and a storyteller's gift to create a book equally relevant for both casual readers fascinated by Paul's life and serious biblical scholars. Pollock begins his fast-movig narrative with Stephen's death and follows Paul through his conversion, missionary ...
The Epistle to the Romans is the sixth book in the New Testament, and the longest of the thirteen Pauline epistles.Biblical scholars agree that it was composed by Paul the Apostle to explain that salvation is offered through the gospel of Jesus Christ.. Romans was likely written while Paul was staying in the house of Gaius in Corinth.The epistle was probably transcribed by Paul's amanuensis ...
The Book Of Titus Was Written By Paul; The Book Of Philemon Was Written By Paul; Recommended: Amazing Bible Facts And Statistics. List Of All Books Of The Bible And Their Authors. Complete List of Apostle Paul's Prayers In The Bible. List Of Names In The Bible & Meaning From A To Z. Facebook.
In the Dune book, Alia is born and grows at an alarming rate, with the pre-born mind of an adult but the body of a toddler, by the time Paul becomes Emperor. She was even the one to kill Baron ...
Paul McCartney Will Hate Their New Beatles Book (Almost as Much as He Hated Their Last One) 'All You Need Is Love' authors Steven Gaines and Peter Brown come together for a dishy conversation ...
Paul Lewis is a veteran sports journalist who has written four books and covered Rugby World Cups, America's Cups, Olympic & Commonwealth Games and more.. ANALYSIS
Date Written: May 29, 2024. ... Paul A. Gowder (Contact Author) Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law ( email) 375 E. Chicago Ave Chicago, IL 60611 United States. Download This Paper. ... Jeremy R. Paul at Northeastern University - School of Law. Legal Writing eJournal. Follow.