literature search systematic review

Literature reviews can be narrative or systematic, with narrative reviews aiming to provide a descriptive overview of selected literature, without undertaking a systematic literature search. By contrast, systematic reviews use explicit and replicable methods in order to retrieve all available literature pertaining to a specific topic to answer ...

Abstract. This article aims to provide an overview of the structure, form and content of systematic reviews. It focuses in particular on the literature searching component, and covers systematic database searching techniques, searching for grey literature and the importance of librarian involvement in the search.

Systematic review quality is highly dependent on the literature search(es) used to identify studies. To follow best practices for reporting search strategies, as well as increase reproducibility and transparency, document various elements of the literature search for your review.

INTRODUCTION. Librarians and information specialists are often involved in the process of preparing and completing systematic reviews (SRs), where one of their main tasks is to identify relevant references to include in the review [].Although several recommendations for the process of searching have been published [2-6], none describe the development of a systematic search strategy from ...

The Literature Search. A systematic review search includes a search of databases, gray literature, personal communications, and a handsearch of high impact journals in the related field. See our list of recommended databases and gray literature sources on this page.

Systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and replicable methodology and presentation. They involve a comprehensive search to locate all relevant published and unpublished work on a subject; a systematic integration of search results; and a critique of the extent, nature, and quality of evidence in relation to a particular research question.

Background: Systematic literature searching is recognised as a critical component of the systematic review process. It involves a systematic search for studies and aims for a transparent report of study identification, leaving readers clear about what was done to identify studies, and how the findings of the review are situated in the relevant evidence.

A systematic review search will: contain many synonyms & variants of search terms; use care in adding search filters; search multiple resources, databases & grey literature, such as reports & clinical trials; Developing an Answerable Question. PICO is a good framework to help clarify your systematic review question.

Screen the literature. Assess the quality of the studies. Extract the data. Analyze the results. Interpret and present the results. 1. Decide on your team. When carrying out a systematic literature review, you should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and strengthen analysis.

1. INTRODUCTION. Evidence synthesis is a prerequisite for knowledge translation. 1 A well conducted systematic review (SR), often in conjunction with meta‐analyses (MA) when appropriate, is considered the "gold standard" of methods for synthesizing evidence related to a topic of interest. 2 The central strength of an SR is the transparency of the methods used to systematically search ...

Several CDC librarians have special training in conducting literature searches for systematic reviews. Literature searches for systematic reviews can take a few weeks to several months from planning to delivery. Fill out a search request form or contact the Stephen B. Thacker CDC Library by email [email protected] or telephone 404-639-1717.

Rapid review. Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research. Completeness of searching determined by time constraints. Time-limited formal quality assessment. Typically narrative and tabular.

Finding relevant resources to search for a systematic review. Sources to search: Bibliographic databases. Grey literature and internet. Scanning reference lists from relevant studies. Searching key journals and conference proceedings (called hand searching) Snowballing and citation checking.

Systematic reviews are a type of evidence synthesis in which authors develop explicit eligibility criteria, collect all the available studies that meet these criteria, and summarize results using reproducible methods that minimize biases and errors. Systematic reviews serve different purposes and us …

Current Vignette: Search term selection with litsearchr v1.0.0 for an example systematic review of the effects of fire on black-backed woodpeckers; Useful litsearchr tutorial created by Luke Tudge on the subject of medication and cognitive behavioral therapy for phobias ; This in-development Library Carpentry lesson introduces people working in library- and information-related roles to using R ...

A systematic review aims to review as much of the literature as possible to minimize bias. As such, it is recommended that at least 3 databases are searched for a systematic review. As PubMed/MEDLINE excludes newer journals and health sciences disciplines, additional databases must be used to minimize publication bias.

For help with systematic reviews and other major literature review projects, please send us an email at [email protected]. ... Identify - Next, a comprehensive search of the literature is undertaken to ensure all studies that meet the predetermined criteria are identified. Each research question is different, so the number and types ...

Image by TraceyChandler. Steps to conducting a systematic review. Quick overview of the process: Steps and resources from the UMB HSHSL Guide. YouTube video (26 min); Another detailed guide on how to conduct and write a systematic review from RMIT University; A roadmap for searching literature in PubMed from the VU Amsterdam; Alexander, P. A. (2020).

The PRISMA Statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) includes an evidence-based minimum set of reporting items as well as a flow-chart to follow when reporting a systematic review or meta-analysis.. These two items on the checklist relate to the search process: Item 7, Information Sources: Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases with ...

What is Systematic Review? A systematic review is a comprehensive, structured analysis of existing research on a specific topic. It uses predefined criteria to identify, evaluate, and synthesize relevant studies, aiming to provide an unbiased summary of the current evidence. ... Conduct a systematic search of the literature using clearly ...

Academic reviews serve as a solid basis as to establish the latest state of affairs on a specific topic. Authors of scoping reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses should aim to include all available relevant studies. The systematic literature search therefore needs to be of the highest quality.

Systematic review methods have influenced many other review types, including the traditional literature review. Covidence is a web-based tool that saves you time at the screening, selection, data extraction and quality assessment stages of your systematic review. It supports easy collaboration across teams and provides a clear overview of task ...

NIH Library Systematic Review Services. The services available are divided into three categories: Initial consultation; Search services; and Post-search services. Each category includes a list of potential services that may be provided to you depending upon your need. ... Draft the literature search steps for the Methods Section (e.g., search ...

The term "literature review" is most commonly used to refer to narrative literature reviews, and these are the types of works that are described in this guide. Some types of literature reviews that use prescribed methods for identifying and evaluating evidence-based literature related to specific questions are known as systematic reviews or ...

Literature search results were downloaded and deduplicated in a reference manager (Reference Manager 12, Thomson Reuters, New York, USA) . Remaining citations were uploaded to an online systematic review management software (DistillerSR, Evidence Partners, Ottawa, Canada) for study selection . Two reviewers independently screened titles and ...

Reviews of DI have tended to evaluate and summarize empirical evidence from English-language studies conducted in Western societies (e.g., Deunk et al., 2018; Smale-Jacobse et al., 2019); very few have synthesized evidence of DI from the Chinese literature via systematic review or meta-analysis. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to ...

Purpose: We evaluate to what extent systematic reviews published in the urological literature follow best practices for the reporting of searches. Materials and methods: Systematic reviews addressing questions of therapy/prevention were sought out in 5 major urological journals from January 1998 to December 2021. Two members performed study selection and data abstraction independently and in ...

This systematic review aims to analyze existing literature, examining the intricate interplay and encouraging future research and treatment strategies. Methods: A systematic search of Literature in PubMed, Embase and Psychinfo, without any language or time restriction, was performed until March 2024 combining thesaurus and free-search indexing ...

Through the synthesis and analysis of 64 papers, from JSTOR, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar data bases, include 2010-2024 of 15 years duration paper works. this systematic literature review identified major themes and provided insights into growth management strategies, marketing tactics, challenges, and opportunities, benefits, that managers confront in their quest to sustain ...

Objectives of the Review. This systematic review will assess the accuracy, effectiveness, and harms of screening for multiple cancers with blood-based biomarkers. The intended audience includes clinicians, professional organizations such as guideline developers, and payers who determine coverage related to laboratory testing.