review of literature on kangaroo mother care pdf

What is kangaroo mother care? Systematic review of the literature

Affiliations.

• 1 Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Saving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, Washington, DC, USA.
• 2 Saving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, Washington, DC, USA.
• 3 Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
• PMID: 27231546
• PMCID: PMC4871067
• DOI: 10.7189/jogh.06.010701

Background: Kangaroo mother care (KMC), often defined as skin-to-skin contact between a mother and her newborn, frequent or exclusive breastfeeding, and early discharge from the hospital has been effective in reducing the risk of mortality among preterm and low birth weight infants. Research studies and program implementation of KMC have used various definitions.

Objectives: To describe the current definitions of KMC in various settings, analyze the presence or absence of KMC components in each definition, and present a core definition of KMC based on common components that are present in KMC literature.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the World Health Organization Regional Databases for studies with key words "kangaroo mother care", "kangaroo care" or "skin to skin care" from 1 January 1960 to 24 April 2014. Two independent reviewers screened articles and abstracted data.

Findings: We screened 1035 articles and reports; 299 contained data on KMC and neonatal outcomes or qualitative information on KMC implementation. Eighty-eight of the studies (29%) did not define KMC. Two hundred and eleven studies (71%) included skin-to-skin contact (SSC) in their KMC definition, 49 (16%) included exclusive or nearly exclusive breastfeeding, 22 (7%) included early discharge criteria, and 36 (12%) included follow-up after discharge. One hundred and sixty-seven studies (56%) described the duration of SSC.

Conclusions: There exists significant heterogeneity in the definition of KMC. A large number of studies did not report definitions of KMC. Skin-to-skin contact is the core component of KMC, whereas components such as breastfeeding, early discharge, and follow-up care are context specific. To implement KMC effectively development of a global standardized definition of KMC is needed.

Publication types

• Systematic Review
• Attitude to Health
• Infant, Newborn
• Kangaroo-Mother Care Method / classification*
• Mothers / psychology*
• Physical Stimulation / methods*

• Harvard Medical School
• HMS Scholarly Articles
• Communities & Collections
• By Issue Date
• FAS Department
• Quick submit
• Waiver Generator
• DASH Stories
• Accessibility
• COVID-related Research

Terms of Use

• Privacy Policy
• By Collections
• By Departments

What is kangaroo mother care? Systematic review of the literature

Published Version

Other sources, citable link to this page, collections.

• HMS Scholarly Articles [17922]
• SPH Scholarly Articles [6362]

Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)

Child Rights Resource centre

Study: Research

What is Kangaroo Mother Care? Systematic review of literature

Publication year:

pdf (877.4 KiB)

Journal of Global Health

This study investigates the various available definitions of kangaroo mother care and identifies its core components. 

Ellen O. Boundy

1 Publication

Grace J. Chan

Sandhya Kajeepeta

Bina Valsangkar

2 Publications

Stephen Wall

5 Publications

+ 2 more authors

View & Download

1 Documents

Document information

Boundy, Ellen O. , Chan, Grace J. , Kajeepeta, Sandhya , Valsangkar, Bina , Wall, Stephen

Content type

© Author/Publisher

Subscribe and receive reading selections

Upload research & contribute to the collection

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

Search life-sciences literature (44,047,727 articles, preprints and more)

• Free full text
• Citations & impact
• Similar Articles

What is kangaroo mother care? Systematic review of the literature.

Author information, affiliations.

• Valsangkar B 2
• Kajeepeta S 3
• Boundy EO 3

Journal of Global Health , 01 Jun 2016 , 6(1): 010701 https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.06.010701   PMID: 27231546  PMCID: PMC4871067

Abstract 

Conclusions, free full text .

What is kangaroo mother care? Systematic review of the literature

Grace j chan.

1 Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

2 Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

3 Saving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, Washington, DC, USA

Bina Valsangkar

Sandhya kajeepeta, ellen o boundy, stephen wall.

• Associated Data

Kangaroo mother care (KMC), often defined as skin–to–skin contact between a mother and her newborn, frequent or exclusive breastfeeding, and early discharge from the hospital has been effective in reducing the risk of mortality among preterm and low birth weight infants. Research studies and program implementation of KMC have used various definitions.

To describe the current definitions of KMC in various settings, analyze the presence or absence of KMC components in each definition, and present a core definition of KMC based on common components that are present in KMC literature.

We conducted a systematic review and searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the World Health Organization Regional Databases for studies with key words “kangaroo mother care”, “kangaroo care” or “skin to skin care” from 1 January 1960 to 24 April 2014. Two independent reviewers screened articles and abstracted data.

We screened 1035 articles and reports; 299 contained data on KMC and neonatal outcomes or qualitative information on KMC implementation. Eighty–eight of the studies (29%) did not define KMC. Two hundred and eleven studies (71%) included skin–to–skin contact (SSC) in their KMC definition, 49 (16%) included exclusive or nearly exclusive breastfeeding, 22 (7%) included early discharge criteria, and 36 (12%) included follow–up after discharge. One hundred and sixty–seven studies (56%) described the duration of SSC.

There exists significant heterogeneity in the definition of KMC. A large number of studies did not report definitions of KMC. Skin–to–skin contact is the core component of KMC, whereas components such as breastfeeding, early discharge, and follow–up care are context specific. To implement KMC effectively development of a global standardized definition of KMC is needed.

Globally, 44% of under–five deaths occur during the neonatal period, and the proportion of under–five deaths due to neonatal causes continues to rise [ 1 , 2 ]. Preterm birth (before 37 weeks gestation) accounts for 35% of neonatal deaths. Low birth weight (defined as <2500 g) is commonly used as a surrogate measure of preterm birth [ 3 ]. Preterm and low birth weight infants who survive the neonatal period are more likely to experience neonatal morbidities including acute respiratory, gastrointestinal, immunologic, central nervous system, hearing and vision problems than both term and normal weight infants [ 4 ].

A significant proportion of deaths among preterm and low birth weight infants is preventable. There is evidence that kangaroo mother care (KMC), when compared to conventional neonatal care in resource–limited settings, significantly reduces the risk of mortality in infants born in facilities who are clinically stable and weighing less than 2000 g [ 5 ]. KMC also reduces the risk of hypothermia, severe illness, nosocomial infection, and length of hospital stay, and improves growth, breastfeeding, and maternal–infant attachment [ 5 , 6 ].

Despite strong evidence for mortality and morbidity reduction in low– and middle–income settings and endorsement from the World Health Organization (WHO), country–level adoption and implementation of KMC has been limited. In a systematic assessment of health system bottlenecks among countries with a high burden of neonatal deaths, KMC was identified as an intervention with significant health systems barriers to scale–up including leadership and governance, health financing, health workforce, health service delivery, health information systems, and community ownership and partnership [ 7 ]. Health intervention priority–setting tools, such as the Lives Saved Tool and Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative methodology, have identified KMC as a high priority intervention based on criteria such as mortality benefit and equity [ 8 , 9 ].

In response to limited global uptake of KMC, in 2013, a group of newborn health stakeholders led by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Save the Children’s Saving Newborn Lives Program launched a global KMC Acceleration Convening. The goal was to address barriers to implementation, increase uptake of KMC as part of an integrated Reproductive Maternal Newborn and Child Health package, and identify research priorities [ 10 ]. In addition to implementation barriers, a lack of a clear definition of KMC has made effective coverage at scale of KMC challenging. A multi–country study in Africa found variation in KMC implementation across facilities in countries with national commitment to KMC [ 11 ]. Regional, country, and facility differences in health worker capacity, financial resources, leadership, health information systems, and cultural and community structures create challenges to developing and adopting a global definition of KMC.

The WHO has defined KMC as early, continuous, and prolonged skin–to–skin contact (SSC) between the mother and preterm babies; exclusive breastfeeding or breast milk feeding; early discharge after hospital–initiated KMC with continuation at home; and adequate support and follow–up for mothers at home [ 12 ]. While the WHO provides guidance on the components of KMC, guidance on the operationalization and clinical implementation of KMC are needed. There are significant variations in the timing of initiation, duration of SSC, positioning, necessary equipment and supplies, discharge criteria, follow–up frequency, indicators and measurement, and health workforce needs. The variations in these components have differential effects on preterm and low birth weight outcomes. As the global newborn health community begins to accelerate implementation of KMC, a standardized operational definition is needed. We conducted a systematic review of the KMC literature to 1) describe the current definitions of KMC in various settings, 2) analyze the presence or absence of WHO KMC components in each definition, and 3) present a core definition of KMC–common components that are present in at least 70% of all studies and programs–and describe how KMC definitions vary by context. This review provides a basis for development of an operational definition and clinical standards to accelerate the uptake of KMC globally.

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and WHO regional databases: AIM, LILACS, IMEMR, IMSEAR, and WPRIM using the search terms “kangaroo mother care”, “kangaroo care”, and “skin to skin care” with no language restrictions from 1 January 1960 to 24 April 2014 for original reports including case–control studies, cohort studies, randomized control trials, and case series with 10 or more participants (see Online Supplementary Document (Online Supplementary Document) for the review protocol and full search strategy). Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were included if they contained at least one of the following: the amount of time KMC was practiced, an association between KMC (as an isolated exposure, not part of a larger package) add any outcome, barriers to implementing KMC or factors necessary for successful implementation of KMC. Exclusion criteria were non–human subjects, case series or descriptive studies with fewer than 10 participants, and non–primary data collection or analysis (eg, reviews, meeting abstracts, editorials). Our population of interest included mothers, newborns, or mother–newborn dyads (not restricted to any specific ages) who have practiced KMC as well as health care providers, health facilities, communities, and health systems that have implemented KMC.

We also conducted hand–searches through the reference lists of the articles included in our review and published systematic reviews. Cochrane reviews were searched for relevant articles. To search the “grey literature” for unpublished studies, we explored programmatic reports and requested data from programs implementing KMC to obtain programmatic perspectives in addition to those provided by research studies. Reports were included following the same criteria as above.

Two independent reviewers examined titles, abstracts and full–text articles for inclusion into the review using a screening form based on our inclusion criteria. Using standardized data abstraction forms, two reviewers abstracted data independently from all included articles and reports. At each stage, reviewers compared results to ensure agreement. In the case of disagreement between the two reviewers, a third party acted as a tiebreaker. Native speakers abstracted data from articles in foreign languages. Languages for which a native speaker was not identified (ie, German, Finnish, Korean, Thai and Polish) were translated using an online translation software to assist with data abstraction. If an article or report were missing any information, we contacted the authors to request the data.

Using standardized forms, data were abstracted on study characteristics such as study design, country, sample size, location, and duration of follow–up. We abstracted data on KMC definitions including data on SSC, exclusive breastfeeding, early discharge from the facility, and follow–up and as well as other components [ 12 ]. We generated categorical variables for each component and calculated descriptive frequencies, means, medians and ranges for quantitative data.

Study selection and characteristics

Flow diagram of study selection.

Characteristics of included studies

KMC components

The individual components of KMC varied across studies ( Table 2 ). Kangaroo mother care was not defined in 88 studies (29%). All 211 studies (71%) with KMC definitions included SSC as a component. One–hundred forty–eight studies (50%) included SSC only. For the additional components, 49 studies (16%) included SSC and exclusive or near–exclusive breastfeeding, 36 (12%) included SSC and follow–up after discharge from the health facility, and 22 (7%) included early discharge from the health facility.

Description of kangaroo mother care components in studies

Skin–to–skin contact

Among the studies that defined SSC as part of the KMC package, criteria for SSC initiation, SSC ending, and SSC duration were not well described ( Table 3 and Table 4 ). In 43 studies (14%), SSC was initiated after non–stability criteria were met, 27 studies (9%) promoted immediate initiation of SSC within 60 minutes of birth, 76 studies (25%) encouraged SSC after stability criteria were met, 18 studies (6%) encouraged SSC after a painful procedure, and 135 (45%) did not describe SSC initiation criteria. Forty–three studies observed initiation of SSC of which 4 (9%) observed immediate initiation of SSC. Criteria for stability were non–specific including the terms “clinically stable,” “adapted to extra–uterine life,” “can tolerate handling,” and “without serious illness”. More defined criteria included “satisfactory APGAR score,” “stable weight,” and “stable respiratory and hemodynamic parameters.” Criteria to end SSC were largely non–specific with terms “one day or less,” “until baby no longer accepts,” or “until parent no longer accepts.” More specific terms included “until reaches satisfactory weight [2000 grams or 2500 grams]”. We compared descriptions of SSC with observations of SSC to differentiate promotion vs practice. Most studies (>85%) did not include data on observations of SSC practiced ( Table 3 ).

Promoted skin–to–skin contact characteristics compared to observed skin–to–skin contact characteristics

Promoted skin–to–skin contact duration compared to observed skin–to–skin contact duration

Breastfeeding

Description of breastfeeding characteristics

Discharge criteria from facility

Description of discharge and follow–up characteristics

Other components

Description of clothing and positioning during kangaroo mother care

There is significant heterogeneity in the definition of KMC and a large number of studies did not report a definition of KMC. Of the studies that defined KMC, SSC was present in all studies. Additional KMC components – breastfeeding, early discharge, and follow–up–were missing in the majority of studies. These findings suggest that SSC is accepted in research and programmatic settings as an essential component of KMC, but the other components vary by context, defined as demographic, economic, social, and cultural factors, and newborn characteristics.

The lack of a clear KMC definition and guidance for implementing KMC is a reflection of incomplete evidence. Evidence for KMC is largely based on meta–analyses that combine studies with heterogeneous definitions of KMC and occur in different settings [ 5 , 6 ]. Attempts to stratify the association of KMC on outcomes by KMC components, newborn characteristics (birth weight, gestational age), and high NMR vs low NMR often do not yield statistically significant results because of the limited data available. We do not know the effect of different combinations of KMC components, nor do we understand the feasibility with which each component can be implemented effectively in different contexts. Our study was limited by the lack of data on the duration of SSC. Furthermore, measurement of SSC duration was based on mothers’ report of time with minimal observational data. Studies where SSC duration was measured by an independent observer may be biased by the Hawthorn effect.

To define the optimal duration of SSC, we need additional data on the dose response of SSC duration on mortality and morbidity outcomes. The benefits of SSC are likely dependent on the duration of SSC, however the duration of SSC must also be balanced with the feasibility of practicing SSC for extended periods of time. In most settings promoting SSC 24 hours a day is not feasible. Understanding the minimal duration of SSC that provides the maximal benefits will provide more specific recommendations. Most studies initiated KMC after stabilization of the newborn and the effect of KMC on mortality and morbidity is generalizable to the population of newborns who survive to be stabilized. The effect of KMC immediately after birth before stabilization is unclear due to inconclusive evidence [ 14 – 17 ]. Additional efforts to test the effect of KMC prior to stabilization and to define stability is needed through further studies or by consulting experts at each level of care (primary, secondary, or tertiary care) through a Delphi method.

To operationalize KMC, the simpler the intervention the more likely it is to scale [ 18 ]. A simple and clear operational definition for KMC is needed. Evidence suggests benefits for newborns less than 2000 g, who are stabilized in facilities with SSC as the primary component. More work is needed to improve the measurement of gestational age and improving the recording of birth weights in facilities to better understand the impact of KMC and for whom there are benefits. Our review suggests that skin–to–skin contact is the core minimal component of KMC and variations depend on context and individual clinical needs of the newborn. For example, extremely preterm newborns who are unable to coordinate their suck and swallow will need feeding support such as nasogastric feeding or intravenous fluid. In high resource settings with space and infection precautions, a provider may recommend SSC for a preterm infant but choose not to discharge early from the facility. To operationalize KMC, a simple matrix that lists newborn characteristics in columns and KMC components in rows for different settings, ie, tertiary, secondary, primary or community levels, can take into account the core SSC components with variations based on differences in the newborn and context.

As implementation of KMC begins to accelerate globally, data on the context, individual newborn factors, and KMC components can be collected and harmonized to generate a model that will best define KMC for a set of individual newborn characteristics in specific settings. Research and programmatic agendas to advance KMC should include a standardized set of indicators and measurement tools that document SSC initiation criteria, SSC duration as number of hours per day promoted and ideally observed, feeding protocols, discharge criteria from a facility to community and follow–up standards, and discharge criteria from KMC. To track progress, indicators and standard measurement tools are needed to measure coverage of key newborn interventions including KMC [ 19 ]. The release of the new preterm guidelines by the World Health Organization, where KMC is recommended for all newborns less than 2000 g, will provide an opportunity for programs and researchers to start addressing definition gaps, establish global recommendations of operational definitions and core components of KMC, and accelerate KMC within care of preterm babies.

Developing a standardized operational definition of KMC and employing indicators and measurement tools to measure and evaluate KMC acceleration efforts is needed. More than half of the studies equate KMC with SSC. Moving forward, careful distinction between KMC and SSC is needed. While SSC is beneficial for all newborns, KMC should be clearly defined, at the bare minimum, as a package of interventions including SSC, exclusive breastfeeding, and close monitoring for preterm and/or low birthweight babies. Researchers and program implementers can contribute to building a more solid evidence base for KMC by measuring and reporting how KMC is defined–the components implemented and the feasibility of implementation based on the context–and the outcomes measured. A central and accessible database to share knowledge should contain this data in addition to standardized indicators, such as the proportion of eligible newborns who receive KMC and the barriers and facilitators to implementation of KMC.

• Acknowledgments

We thank Stacie Constantian, Roya Dastjerdi, and Tobi Skotnes for reviewing and abstracting data. Rodrigo Kuromoto and Eduardo Toledo reviewed non–English articles. We acknowledge Kate Lobner for developing and running the search strategy. We would like to thank the mothers and newborns who participated in these studies to better understand how research and programs define KMC.

Funding: Funding for this systematic review was provided by Saving Newborn Lives program of Save the Children Federation, Inc.

Authorship contributions: All authors listed have participated in the concept, design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting, or editing of the manuscript. All authors have approved the manuscript as submitted.

Competing interests: The authors completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author). None of the authors has any competing interests to declare. There are no competing interests to disclose.

• Additional Material

Full text links 

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.06.010701

Citations & impact 

Impact metrics, citations of article over time, alternative metrics.

Smart citations by scite.ai Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles. Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed. https://scite.ai/reports/10.7189/jogh.06.010701

Article citations, feasibility and acceptability of a novel biomedical device to prevent neonatal hypothermia and augment kangaroo mother care in kenya: qualitative analysis of focus group discussions and key informant interviews..

Bhuiya NA , Liu S , Muyodi D , Bucher SL

PLOS Glob Public Health , 4(4):e0001708, 16 Apr 2024

Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38626201 | PMCID: PMC11020951

Parents' and neonatal healthcare professionals' views on barriers and facilitators to parental presence in the neonatal unit: a qualitative study.

Schmid SV , Arnold C , Jaisli S , Bubl B , Harju E , Kidszun A

BMC Pediatr , 24(1):268, 24 Apr 2024

Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38658901 | PMCID: PMC11040849

Microbiome dysbiosis: a modifiable state and target to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infections and other diseases in neonates.

Aneja A , Johnson J , Prochaska EC , Milstone AM

J Perinatol , 44(1):125-130, 30 Oct 2023

Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 37904005

Determinants of Kangaroo Mother Care among low-birth-weight infants in low resource settings.

Lawal TV , Lawal DI , Adeleye OJ

PLOS Glob Public Health , 3(9):e0002015, 12 Sep 2023

Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 37699007 | PMCID: PMC10497168

Effects of Kangaroo Care on the development of oral skills and achievement of exclusive oral feeding in preterm infants.

Ciochetto CR , Bolzan GP , Gonçalves DDS , Silveira FPHD , Weinmann ARM

Codas , 35(5):e20220070, 04 Aug 2023

Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 37556686 | PMCID: PMC10449087

Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

BioStudies: supplemental material and supporting data

• http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4871067?xr=true

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.

Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants.

Conde-Agudelo A , Díaz-Rossello JL

Cochrane Database Syst Rev , (4):CD002771, 22 Apr 2014

Cited by: 55 articles | PMID: 24752403

Conde-Agudelo A , Diaz-Rossello JL , Belizan JM

Cochrane Database Syst Rev , (2):CD002771, 01 Jan 2003

Cited by: 28 articles | PMID: 12804436

Cochrane Database Syst Rev , (4):CD002771, 01 Jan 2000

Cited by: 29 articles | PMID: 11034759

Conde-Agudelo A , Belizán JM , Diaz-Rossello J

Cochrane Database Syst Rev , (3):CD002771, 16 Mar 2011

Cited by: 81 articles | PMID: 21412879

Barriers and enablers of health system adoption of kangaroo mother care: a systematic review of caregiver perspectives.

Smith ER , Bergelson I , Constantian S , Valsangkar B , Chan GJ

BMC Pediatr , 17(1):35, 25 Jan 2017

Cited by: 52 articles | PMID: 28122592 | PMCID: PMC5267363

Europe PMC is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure