write a report bhuj earthquake

Bhuj Earthquake India 2001 – A Complete Study

Bhuj earthquake india.

Gujarat : Disaster on a day of celebration : 51st Republic Day on January 26, 2001

• 7.9 on the Richter scale.
• 8.46 AM January 26th 2001
• 20,800 dead

Basic Facts

• Earthquake: 8:46am on January 26, 2001
• Epicenter: Near Bhuj in Gujarat, India
• Magnitude: 7.9 on the Richter Scale

Geologic Setting

• Indian Plate Sub ducting beneath Eurasian Plate
• Continental Drift
• Convergent Boundary

Specifics of 2001 Quake

Compression Stress between region’s faults

Depth: 16km

Probable Fault: Kachchh Mainland

Fault Type: Reverse Dip-Slip (Thrust Fault)

The earthquake’s epicentre was 20km from Bhuj. A city with a population of 140,000 in 2001. The city is in the region known as the Kutch region. The effects of the earthquake were also felt on the north side of the Pakistan border, in Pakistan 18 people were killed.

Tectonic systems

The earthquake was caused at the convergent plate boundary between the Indian plate and the Eurasian plate boundary. These pushed together and caused the earthquake. However as Bhuj is in an intraplate zone, the earthquake was not expected, this is one of the reasons so many buildings were destroyed – because people did not build to earthquake resistant standards in an area earthquakes were not thought to occur. In addition the Gujarat earthquake is an excellent example of liquefaction, causing buildings to ‘sink’ into the ground which gains a consistency of a liquid due to the frequency of the earthquake.

India : Vulnerability to earthquakes

• 56% of the total area of the Indian Republic is vulnerable to seismic activity .
• 12% of the area comes under Zone V (A&N Islands, Bihar, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, N.E.States, Uttaranchal)
• 18% area in Zone IV (Bihar, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Lakshadweep, Maharashtra, Punjab, Sikkim, Uttaranchal, W. Bengal)
• 26% area in Zone III (Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Maharashtra, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttaranchal, W. Bengal)
• Gujarat: an advanced state on the west coast of India.
• On 26 January 2001, an earthquake struck the Kutch district of Gujarat at 8.46 am.
• Epicentre 20 km North East of Bhuj, the headquarter of Kutch.
• The Indian Meteorological Department estimated the intensity of the earthquake at 6.9 Richter. According to the US Geological Survey, the intensity of the quake was 7.7 Richter.
• The quake was the worst in India in the last 180 years.

What earthquakes do

• Casualties: loss of life and injury.
• Loss of housing.
• Damage to infrastructure.
• Disruption of transport and communications.
• Breakdown of social order.
• Loss of industrial output.
• Loss of business.
• Disruption of marketing systems.
• The earthquake devastated Kutch. Practically all buildings and structures of Kutch were brought down.
• Ahmedabad, Rajkot, Jamnagar, Surendaranagar and Patan were heavily damaged.
• Nearly 19,000 people died. Kutch alone reported more than 17,000 deaths.
• 1.66 lakh people were injured. Most were handicapped for the rest of their lives.
• The dead included 7,065 children (0-14 years) and 9,110 women.
• There were 348 orphans and 826 widows.

Loss classification

Deaths and injuries: demographics and labour markets

Effects on assets and GDP

Effects on fiscal accounts

Financial markets

Disaster loss

• Initial estimate Rs. 200 billion.
• Came down to Rs. 144 billion.
• No inventory of buildings
• Non-engineered buildings
• Land and buildings
• Stocks and flows
• Reconstruction costs (Rs. 106 billion) and loss estimates (Rs. 99 billion) are different
• Public good considerations

Human Impact: Tertiary effects

• Affected 15.9 million people out of 37.8 in the region (in areas such as Bhuj, Bhachau, Anjar, Ganhidham, Rapar)
• High demand for food, water, and medical care for survivors
• Humanitarian intervention by groups such as Oxfam: focused on Immediate response and then rehabilitation
• Of survivors, many require persistent medical attention
• Region continues to require assistance long after quake has subsided
• International aid vital to recovery

Social Impacts

• 80% of water and food sources were destroyed.
• The obvious social impacts are that around 20,000 people were killed and near 200,000 were injured.
• However at the same time, looting and violence occurred following the quake, and this affected many people too.
• On the other hand, the earthquake resulted in millions of USD in aid, which has since allowed the Bhuj region to rebuild itself and then grow in a way it wouldn’t have done otherwise.
• The final major social effect was that around 400,000 Indian homes were destroyed resulting in around 2 million people being made homeless immediately following the quake.

Social security and insurance

• Ex gratia payment: death relief and monetary benefits to the injured
• Major and minor injuries
•  Cash doles
• Government insurance fund
• Group insurance schemes
• Claim ratio

Demographics and labour market

• Geographic pattern of ground motion, spatial array of population and properties at risk, and their risk vulnerabilities.
• Low population density was a saving grace.
• Extra fatalities among women
• Effect on dependency ratio
• Farming and textiles

Economic  Impacts

• Total damage estimated at around $7 billion. However $18 billion of aid was invested in the Bhuj area.
• Over 15km of tarmac road networks were completely destroyed.
• In the economic capital of the Gujarat region, Ahmedabad, 58 multi storey buildings were destroyed, these buildings contained many of the businesses which were generating the wealth of the region.
• Many schools were destroyed and the literacy rate of the Gujarat region is now the lowest outside southern India.

Impact on GDP

• Applying ICOR
• Rs. 99 billion – deduct a third as loss of current value added.
• Get GDP loss as Rs. 23 billion
• Adjust for heterogeneous capital, excess capacity, loss Rs. 20 billion.
• Reconstruction efforts.
• Likely to have been Rs. 15 billion.

Fiscal accounts

• Differentiate among different taxes: sales tax, stamp duties and registration fees, motor vehicle tax, electricity duty, entertainment tax, profession tax, state excise and other taxes. Shortfall of Rs. 9 billion of which about Rs. 6 billion unconnected with earthquake.
• Earthquake related other flows.
• Expenditure:Rs. 8 billion on relief. Rs. 87 billion on rehabilitation.

Impact on Revenue Continue Reading

Comments are closed.

Privacy Overview

• Previous Article
• Next Article
• INTRODUCTION
• SEISMOTECTONIC SETTING
• MACROSEISMIC FIELD OBSERVATIONS
• LOCAL SITE EFFECTS
• DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

A Seismological Report on the 26 January 2001 Bhuj, India Earthquake

• Open the PDF for in another window
• View This Citation
• Add to Citation Manager
• Permissions
• Search Site

J. P. Narayan , M. L. Sharma , Ashwani Kumar; A Seismological Report on the 26 January 2001 Bhuj, India Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters 2002;; 73 (3): 343–355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.73.3.343

Download citation file:

• Ris (Zotero)

An earthquake of magnitude M w 7.6 (USGS) on 26 January 2001 left a trail of death and devastation in Gujarat, one of India's front-runners in industrial prosperity. The earthquake caused a heavy toll of about 20,000 dead, more than 60,000 injured, 200,000 people homeless, and more than U.S. $2 billion in losses. The epicenter of this earthquake (23.40°N, 70.3°E) was located about 10 km northeast of the town of Bachau in the Kutch district in the state of Gujarat. The focal depth was estimated to be 25 km (USGS). This earthquake was felt to Kashmir in the north, Kanyakumari...

Email alerts

• Bhuj earthquake 2001
• earthquakes
• geologic hazards
• Gujarat India
• Indian Peninsula
• Kutch India
• risk assessment
• seismic response
• seismic risk
• seismotectonics
• N23°11'60" - N23°11'60", E69°54'00" - E69°54'00"

Citing articles via

Affiliations.

• Meetings and Conferences
• Join the Society
• Publisher Homepage
• Contact the Society
• Institutional Subscribers
• Online ISSN 1938-2057
• ISSN 0895-0695
• Copyright © 2024 Seismological Society of America
• How to Subscribe
• Privacy Policy
• For Librarians
• For Industry
• For Society Members
• For Authors
• Terms & Conditions
• 1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1500
• McLean, VA 22102
• Telephone: 1-800-341-1851
• Copyright © 2024 GeoScienceWorld

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

• First Online: 28 February 2022

Cite this chapter

• C. P. Rajendran 8 &
• Kusala Rajendran 9  

Part of the book series: GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences ((GEPS))

203 Accesses

The January 26, 2001, M w 7.7 earthquake located near Bachau, in the state of Gujarat in western India, referred to as the Bhuj earthquake, after the major city in the region, is the largest to have occurred in the Kachchh region since the 1819 earthquake (Fig.  4.1 ). Although located ~70 km southwest of the epicente.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Antolik, M., & Dreger, D. S. (2003). Rupture process of the 26 January 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj, India, earthquake from teleseismic broadband data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 93 , 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020142

Article   Google Scholar  

Bendick, R., Bilham, R., Fielding, E., Gaur, V. K., Hough, S. E., Kier, G., Kukarni, M. N., Marin, S., Mueller, K., & Mukul, M. (2001). The 26 January 2001 “Republic Day” earthquake, India. Seismological Research Letters , 72 , 328–335.

Biswas, S., & Grasemann, B. (2005). Quantitative morphotectonics of the southern Shillong Plateau (Bangladesh/India). Australian Journal of Earth Sciences , 97 , 82–03.

Google Scholar  

Biswas, S. K. (1982). Rift basins in western margin of India and their hydrocarbon prospects with special reference to Kutch basin. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin , 66 , 1497–1513.

Biswas, S. K. (1987). Regional tectonic framework, structure and evolution of the western marginal basins of India. Tectonophysics , 135 , 307–327.

Biswas, S. K. (2016). Tectonic framework, structure and tectonic evolution of Kutch Basin, Western India. Special Publication of the Geological Society of India , 6 , 129–150.

Biswas, S. K., & Khattri, K. N. (2002). A geological study of earthquakes in Kutch, Gujarat, India. Journal of the Geological Society of India , 60 , 131–142.

Bodin, P., & Horton, S. (2004). Source parameters and tectonic implication of aftershocks of the Mw 7.6 Bhuj earthquake of 26 January 2001. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 94 , 818–827.

Chandrasekhar, D. V., & Mishra, D. C. (2002). Some geodynamic aspects of Kutch basin and seismicity: An insight from gravity studies. Current Science , 83 , 492–498.

Chandrasekhar, D. V., Mishra, D. C., Singh, B., Vijayakumar, V., & Bürgmann, R. (2004). Source parameters of the Bhuj earthquake, India of January 26, 2001 from height and gravity changes. Geophysical Research Letters , 31 , L19608. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020768

Chopra, S., Kumar, D., Rastogi, B. K., Choudhury, P., & Yadav, R. B. S. (2012). Deterministic seismic scenario for Gujarat region, India. Natural Hazard , 60 , 517–540.

Chung, W.-P., & Gao, H. (1995). Source parameters of the Anjar earthquake of July 21, 1956, India, and its seismotectonic implications for the Kutch rift basin. Tectonophysics , 242 , 281–292.

Copley, A., Avouac, J. P., Hollingsworth, J., & Leprince, S. (2011). The 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj earthquake, low fault friction, and the crustal support of plate driving forces in India. Journal of Geophysical Research , 116 , B08405. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB008137 .

Das, A., Bhattacharya, F., Rastogi, B. K., Chauhan, G., Ngangom, M., & Thakkar, M. G. (2016). Response of a dryland fluvial system to climate-tectonic perturbations during the Late Quaternary: Evidence from Rukmawati River basin, Kachchh, Western India. Journal of Earth System Science , 125 (6), 1119–1138.

Dumka, R. K., Chopra, S., & Prajapati, S. (2019). GPS derived crustal deformation analysis of Kachchh, zone of 2001(M7.7) earthquake, Western India. Quaternary International , 507 , 295–301.

Ellis, M., Gomberg, J., & Schweig, E. (2001). Indian earthquake may serve as analog for New Madrid earthquakes. Eos (Transactions, American Geophysical Union) , 82 , 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1029/01EO00211 .

Hough, S. E., Martin, S., Bilham, R., & Atkinson, G. M. (2002). The 26 January 2001 M 7.6 Bhuj, India, earthquake observed and predicted ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 92 (6), 2061–2079.

Iyengar, R. N., Sharma, D., & Siddiqui, J. M. (1999). Earthquake history of India in medieval times. Indian Journal of History of Science , 34 , 181–237.

Johnston, A. C. (1996). Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions, I. Geophysical Journal International , 124 , 381–414.

Joshi, V. P., & Bisht, R. S. (1994). India and the Indus civilization . New Delhi: National Museum Institute.

Kandregula, R. S., Kothyari, G. C., Swamy, V., Taloor, A. K., Lakhote, A., Chauhan, G., Thakkar, M. G., Pathak, V., & Malik, K. (2021). Estimation of regional surface deformation post the 2001 Bhuj earthquake in the Kachchh region, Western India using RADAR interferometry. Geocarto International .

Kayal, J. R., Zhao, D., Mishra, O. P., De, R., & Singh, O. P. (2002). The Bhuj earthquake: Tomographic evidance for fluids at the hypocenter and its implications for rupture nucleation. Geophysical Research Letters , 29 (24), 2152.

Kothyari, G. M., Kandregula, R. S., Chauhan, G., & Thakkar, M. G. (2020). Geomorphic and paleoseismological evidence of active Kachchh Mainland Fault, Kachchh, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences ,  13 (12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05350-6

Kothyari, G. C., Rastogi, B. K., Morthekai, P., Dumka, R. K., & Kandregula, R. S. (2016). Active segmentation assessment of the tectonically active South Wagad Fault in Kachchh, Western Peninsular India. Geomorphology , 253 , 491–507.

Kumar, G. P., Mahesh, P., Nagar, M., Mahender, E., Kumar, V., Mohan, K., & Kumar, R. M. (2017). Role of deep crustal fluids in the genesis of intraplate earthquakes in the Kachchh region, northwestern India. Geophysical Research Letters , 44 , 4054–4063. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072936

Li, Q., Liu, M., & Yang, Y. (2002). The 01/26/2001 Bhuj earthquake: Intraplate or interplate? In S. Stein & J. Freymueller (Eds.), Plate boundary zones: Washington (pp. 255–264). American Geophysical Union.

Malik, J. N., Morino, M., Mishra, P., Bhuiyan, C., & Kaneko, F. (2008). First active fault exposure identified along Kachchh Mainland Fault: Evidence from trench excavation near Lodai village, Gujarat, Western India. Journal of the Geological Society of India , 71 , 201–208.

Mandal, P. (2013). Seismogenesis of the uninterrupted occurrence of the aftershock activity in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Natural Hazards , 65 , 1063–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0115-7

Mandal, P., & Pujol, J. (2006). Seismic imaging of the aftershock zone of the 2001 Mw7.7 Bhuj earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters , 33 (L05309), 1–4.

Mandal, P., & Horton, S. (2007). Relocation of aftershocks, focal mechanisms and stress inversion: Implications toward the seismo-tectonics of the causative fault zone of Mw7.6. (2001). Bhuj earthquake (India). Tectonophysics , 429 (2007), 61–78.

Mandal, P., Rastogi, B. K., Satyanarayana, H. V. S., Kousalya, M., Vijayraghavan, R., Satyamurthy, C., Raju, I. P., Sarma, A. N. S., & Kumar, N. (2004). Characterization of the causative fault system for the 2001 Bhuj earthquake of Mw 7.7. Tectonophysics , 378 , 105–121.

Maurya, D. M., Chowksey, V., Tiwari, P., & Chamyal, L. S. (2017a). Tectonic geomorphology and neotectonic setting of the seismically active South Wagad Fault (SWF). Western India Using Field and GPR Data Acta Geophysics , 65 , 1167–1184.

Maurya, D. M., Chowksey, V., Patidar, A. K., & Chamyal, L. S. (2017b). A review and new data on neotectonic evolution of active faults in the Kachchh Basin. Western India: Legacy of post- deccan trap tectonic inversion. Geological Society, London, Special Publications , 445 , 237–268.

Maurya, D. M., Rachana, R., & Chamyal, L. S. (1998). Seismically induced deformational structures (Seismites) from the Mild-Late Holocene Terraces, Lower Mahi Valley, Gujarat. Journal of the Geological Society of India , 51 , 755–758.

Maurya, D. M., Thakkar, M. G., & Chamyal, L. S. (2003). Implications of transverse fault system on tectonic evolution of Mainland Kachchh, Western India. Current Science , 85 , 661–667.

McCalpin, J. P., & Thakkar, M. G. (2003). 2001 Bhuj-Kachchh earthquake: Surface faulting and its relation with neotectonics and regional structures, Gujarat, Western India. Annales Geophysicae , 46 , 937–956.

Mohan, K., Chaudhary, P., Patel, P., Chaudhary, B. S., & Chopra, S. (2018). Magnetotelluric study to characterize Kachchh Mainland Fault (KMF) and Katrol Hill Fault (KHF) in the western part of Kachchh region of Gujarat, India. Tectonophysics , 726 .

Mohan, K. (2014). Seismic-hazard assessment in the Kachchh region of Gujarat (India) through deterministic modeling using a semi-empirical approach. Seismological Research Letters , 85 (1), 1–9.

Morino, M., Malik, J. N., Gadhavi, M. S., Khalid, A., Bhuiyan, C., Mishra, P., & Kaneko, F. (2008). Active low-angle reverse fault and wide Quaternary deformation identified in Jhura trench across the Kachchh Mainland Fault, Kachchh, Gujarat, India. Journal of Active Fault Research , 29 , 71–77.

Narula, P. L., Chaubey, S. K., & Sinha, S. (2002). Macroseismic surveys. Earthquake Spectra , 18 , 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2803905

Negishi, H., Mori, J., Sato, T., Singh, R., Kumar, S., & Hirata, N. (2002). Size and orientation of the fault plane for the 2001 Gujarat, India earthquake (Mw7.7) from aftershock observations: A high stress drop event. Geophysical Research Letters , 29 (20), 1949.

Pollitz, F. F., & Kellogg, L., & Bürgmann, R. (2001). Sinking mafic body in a reactivated lower crust: A mechanism for stress concentration at the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 91 (6), 1882–1897.

Prizomwala, S. P., Solanki, T., Chauhan, G., Das, A., Bhatt, N., Thakkar, M. G., & Rastogi, B. K. (2016). Spatial variations in tectonic activity along the Kachchh Mainland Fault, Kachchh, western India: Implications in seismic hazard assessment. Natural Hazards (Dordrecht) , 82 (2), 947–961.

Rajendran C. P., & Rajendran K. (2002). Historical constraints on previous seismic activity and morphologic changes near the source zone of the 1819 Rann of Kachchh earthquake: Further light on the penultimate event Seismol Res Lett. 73 , 470–479.

Rajendran, C. P., & Rajendran, K. (2003). The surface deformation and earthquake history associated with the 1819 Kachchh earthquake. Memoirs of the Geological Society of India , 54 , 87–142.

Rajendran, C. P., Rajendran, K., Thakkar, M., & Goyal, B. (2008). Assessing the previous activity at the source zone of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake based on the near-source and distant paleoseismological indicators. Journal of Geophysical Research , 113 , B0531.

Rajendran, C. P., Singh, T., Mukul, M., Thakkar, M., Kothyari, G., John, B., & Rajendran, K. (2020). Paleoseismological studies in India (2016–2020): Status and prospects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Indian , 86 (1), 585–607.

Rajendran, K., Rajendran, C. P., Thakkar, M. G., & Gartia, R. K. (2002). Sand blows from the 2001 Bhuj earthquake reveal clues on past seismicity. Current Science , 83 , 603–610.

Rajendran, K., Rajendran, C. P., Thakkar, M., & Tuttle, M. P. (2001). The 2001 Kachchh (Bhuj) earthquake: Coseismic surface features and significance. Current Science , 80 , 1397–1405.

Rao, N. P., Tsukuda, T., Koruga, M., Bhatia, S. C., & Suresh, G. (2002). Deep lower crustal earthquakes in central India: Inferences from analysis of regional broadband data of the 1997 May 21 Jabalpur earthquake. Geophysical Journal International , 148 , 132–138.

Rastogi, B. K., Aggarwal, S. K, Rao, N., & Choudhury, P. (2011). Triggered/migrated seismicity due to the 2001 M w7.7 Bhuj earthquake, Western India. Natural Hazards , 65 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0083-3 .

Ratnakar, S. (2001). Understanding Harappan civilization in the Indus valley (p. 166). New Delhi: Tulika Books.

Schmidt, D. A., & Bürgmann, R. (2006). InSAR constraints on the source parameters of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters , 33 , L022315.

Scholz, C. H., Aviles, C. A., & Wesnousky, S. G. (1986). Scaling differences between large interplate and intraplate earthquakes.  Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 76 (1), 65–70.

Silpa, K., & Anil, E. (2021). Revisiting the seismogenic characteristics of stable continental interiors: The case of three Indian events. Quart. Int. 585 , 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.12.035

Snelgrove, A. K. (1979). Migrations of the Indus river, Pakistan, in response to plate tectonic motion. Journal of the Geological Society of India , 20 , 392–403.

Stein, S., Sella, G. F., & Okal, E. A. (2002). The January 26, 2001, Bhuj earthquake and the diffuse western boundary of the Indian plate. In S. Stein & J. Freymueller (Eds.), Plate boundary zones: Washington (pp. 243–254). American Geophysical Union.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Talwani, P., & Gangopadhyay, A. (2001). Tectonic framework of the Kachchh earthquake of 26 January 2001. Seismological Research Letters , 72 , 336–345.

Thakkar, M. G., Ngangom, M., Thakker, P. S., & Juyal, N. (2012). Terrain response to the 1819 Allah Bund earthquake in western Great Rann of Kachchh, Gujarat, India. Current Science , 103 (2), 208–212.

To, A., Bürgmann, R., & Pollitz, F. (2004). Postseismic deformation and stress changes following the 1819 Rann of Kachchh, India earthquake: Was the 2001 Bhuj earthquake a triggered event? Journal of Geophysical Research , 31 , L13609.

Wesnounsky, S. G., Seeber, L., Rockwell, T. K., Thakur, V. C., Briggs, S., Kumar, S., & Ragona, D. (2001). Eight days in Bhuj: Field report bearing on surface rupture and genesis of the January 26, 2001 Republic Day earthquake of India. Seismological Research Letters , 72 , 514–524.

Zoback, M. L., & Richardson, R. M. (1996). Stress perturbation associated with the Amazonas and other ancient continental rifts. Journal of Geophysical Research , 101 , 5459–5475.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

C. P. Rajendran

Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Kusala Rajendran

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Rajendran, C.P., Rajendran, K. (2022). Bhuj 2001. In: Earthquakes of the Indian Subcontinent. GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4748-2_4

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4748-2_4

Published : 28 February 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-16-4747-5

Online ISBN : 978-981-16-4748-2

eBook Packages : Earth and Environmental Science Earth and Environmental Science (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Environment
• Road to Net Zero
• Art & Design
• Film & TV
• Music & On-stage
• Pop Culture
• Fashion & Beauty
• Home & Garden
• Things to do
• Combat Sports
• Horse Racing
• Beyond the Headlines
• Trending Middle East
• Business Extra
• Culture Bites
• Year of Elections
• Pocketful of Dirhams
• Books of My Life
• Iraq: 20 Years On

Twenty years on, painful memories of Gujarat’s deadly earthquake still haunt survivors

The powerful quake in india killed 25,000 people and impacted millions more.

A Muslim man weeps in front of his destroyed house January 29, 2001 in Bhuj, India. Getty Images

On the cold morning of January 26, 2001, Rajesh Bhatt  and his 11-year-old daughter, Prarthana, were asleep at their ancestral home in Bhuj, a town in India's western province of Gujarat. What he witnessed that day would become his worst nightmare.

Indians were preparing to celebrate the country's 52nd Republic Day – a national holiday that traditionally  brings families together to watch the grand military parade in the capital New Delhi on television.

Mr Bhatt had also planned to watch the fighter jets fly past and tanks roll down Delhi’s main boulevard, over tea and flatbreads prepared by his wife, Gayatri.

But as the clock struck 8.46am, a 6.9 magnitude tremor devastated the town and altered his life forever.

He compared the impact to pieces colliding in a popular Indian tabletop game.

"My bed felt like a striker on a carrom board. It was shaking, moving from one place to another," Mr Bhatt told The National .

“At that moment I thought it was a bomb blast, until I realised it was an earthquake.

"I told my daughter that this was our end.”

Mr Bhatt grabbed his daughter and jumped from from the second-floor balcony of the collapsing house.

Within moments, Bhuj, a town of about  140,000 residents, was reduced to rubble.

The earthquake killed at least 25,000 people, and 150,000 were injured. Bhuj was at the epicentre and particularly badly affected.

It shook an area within a radius of 400 kilometres and affected some 16 million people.

For days, the air was filled with dust, reducing visibility to less than a kilometre. For weeks, survivors searched for their loved ones for weeks under the rubble, as smoke from hundreds of pyres billowed from every corner of the town.

Traumatised survivors slept for weeks under tarpaulin tents in open ground, without electricity or access to clean water, telecommunications, hospitals, rail or road transport.

In the following months, families lived in relief camps, before slowly rebuilding their lives and their town.

India marks 20 years since devastating Gujarat earthquake

Mr Bhatt, now 57, was at the time of the disaster an affluent businessman who lived with his father, his wife Gayatri and their daughter Prarthana and his two brothers and their families in the three-storey ancestral home.

After his miraculous escape, Mr Bhatt saw his house collapse in a cloud of dust, trapping his wife, father and brothers' families under the debris.

His father, now 82, and other family members were rescued from the debris the same night. But  Mr Bhatt's wife remained missing.

"I found my father and brother that night, wedged between the collapsed columns, their faces covered with blood. But I didn't find my wife for a week," he said.

After making repeated desperate trips to the debris where his house once stood, Mr Bhatt finally found his wife’s lifeless body.

“She was covered in dust,” he said. “I still cannot stop thinking about her.”

Mr Bhatt remarried three years after the tragedy.

With years of support from NGOs and government grants, the town has regained life. It now boasts earthquake resistant high-rise apartments, advanced hospitals, spacious supermarkets, industries and businesses. But the memories of the earthquake still haunt its inhabitants.

For photographer Paresh Kapta, now 57, it began as an ordinary day on a housewarming ceremony assignment. But while he took pictures on a hill overlooking Bhuj, he saw the town collapse before his eyes.

"I was taking pictures outside, when the earth moved up and down – like a slithering python. When I turned back and looked at the city, there was only dust touching the sky, no sight of houses, only dust," said Mr Kapta.

He managed to capture a 30-second video of the collapsing town and then for the next twelve hours  documented the devastation as he rummaged through the rubble, at times on his two-wheeler, at other times treading carefully on the debris so as to not trample on any survivors.

“Nothing was visible … it was dust everywhere. There was only debris as far as my eyes could see … broken, collapsed houses. One couldn’t know whether they were walking over a body. People were screaming, kids were crying. It was harrowing,” he said.

“Every time there is an earthquake in any part of the world, I stay awake all night. I can’t stop thinking about their pain.

"The memory of that day still haunts me.”

Rebuilding the City: Bhuj, India

With rich cultural historic background,  the city of Bhuj, India is located in the western state of Gujarat in the Kutch district. In close proximity to the Rann of Kutch (salt marshes), Bhuj has a borderline hot desert climate along with being a major tourist destination. Along with home to many beautiful arts and crafts of the Kutch region, the city happens to lies on one of the four active faults in the district.

In 2001, a 7.7 magnitude earthquake measuring on the Richter Scale struck Bhuj and its adjoining areas with epicentre at Bhachau Taluka about 20 km away from the city. 8000 villages along with the Bhuj city were absolutely devastated and millions were homeless in the aftermath of the disaster.

In the pre-disaster period, Bhuj existed as a walled city with a dense urban fabric like any other old fortified cities in India. However, the unplanned and organic development was highly undesirable as the intense labyrinth of streets possessed complex intersections, cul-de-sacs and bottlenecks which caused colossal damage to human resources . They quickly turned into death traps in the wake of the disaster. The entire urban morphology of the city made it vulnerable due to lack of accessibility for immediate evacuation or relief operations. Moreover, important disaster management institutions for exercising response strategies were absent despite the long history of earthquakes in the region.

Redevelopment for the city became quite a challenge and was seen as a long tedious journey of decades. However, after 20 years Bhuj stands much stronger than it ever was, with an unprecedented rehabilitation and reconstruction program.  

Redevelopment and Renewal of Bhuj | Bhuj India

The earthquake killed over 20,000 people, injuring 1,66,000, destroying nearly 4,00,000 homes resulting in multitudes of homeless people looking for rehabilitation. The first and foremost step by the government authorities was to realize relocation sites and initiate a massive rehabilitation program. By September 2001, seven relocation sites were proposed on government land around Bhuj.

In the post-disaster Bhuj, Bhuj Area Development Authority (BHADA) was constituted to implement Town Planning proposals and ensure adherence to maintain safety regulations due to the risk of future disasters. The authorities then initiated the reconstruction of the city which was one of the biggest urban renewal programmes ever undertaken by the government.

After much assessment of earthquake risks in different parts of the city, a Development Plan was proposed to oversee a comprehensive and integrated development all over the city. The major concerns were – Land, Road Network, Physical and Social Infrastructure , water bodies and environment, heritage conservation , and Informal sector redevelopment.  

The city witnessed an expansion of around four times due to building construction regulations which restricted building heights to only two floors. Before the earthquake, about a quarter of the population lived in the old city, approximately 35,000 people in only one square km. This decentralized the large amount of population which was habitual of living in congested squatters of the old city. Another aspect of the development plan proposed an extensive road network and revived the ancient water management system which was deteriorated overtime   

The most crucial of all task was to commence redevelopment in the dense urban morphology of the walled city. However, a vast part of the area was destroyed by the disaster and this presented enormous opportunities for renewal. The Town Planning Scheme devised a two-step strategy. Firstly, a set of new wide loop roads were conceptualized amidst the existing fabric utilizing the already present open spaces and connected the market areas along with the walled city. While it gave access to the entire walled city, the market streets were converted into pedestrians only zones. Secondly, the densely populated fortified expanse underwent land readjustment. Plot Layout was reorganised at the neighbourhood level where the buildings collapsed. This gave away spaces for wider streets and created safer built forms.

Another aspect of the reconstruction process was heritage conservation, which lead to the restoration of a lot of heritage structures such as the three Walled City Gates, Alfred high School, renovation of the old Sharaf Bazaar and many more all over the city.

After two decades, Bhuj now stands proudly and faces boundless economic and infrastructure growth as it learned its lesson the hard way. The city has overgrown from the wounds of the past as it literally rose from the rubble of destruction. It is the epitome of optimism and inspires the distressed in every part of the world.

Resources: 

Buchanan, E. (2011). Gujarat’s astonishing rise from rubble of 2001 quake. BBC News . [online] 30 Jan. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-12309791.

The Indian Express. (2015). Earthquake Rebuilding: Bhuj, the city that learnt its lesson . [online] Available at: https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/earthquake-rebuilding-bhuj-the-city-that-learnt-its-lesson/ [Accessed 9 Aug. 2021].

www.who.int. (n.d.). Resilient reconstruction: 20 years after Gujarat earthquake . [online] Available at: https://www.who.int/india/news/feature-stories/detail/resilient-reconstruction-20-years-after-gujarat-earthquake .

Vasavada, R. and Booth, E. (2017). Effect of the Bhuj, India earthquake of 26 January 2001 on heritage buildings . [online] Aζ South Asia. Available at: https://architexturez.net/doc/az-cf-21244 .

Sanjeev Kumar (2017). After the quake . [online] The Indian Express. Available at: https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/gujarat-earthquake-bhuj-quake-republic-day-4493438/.

Wikipedia Contributors (2019). 2001 Gujarat earthquake . [online] Wikipedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Gujarat_earthquake.

Devi, M. (2021). 20 years of Gujarat earthquake: Numbers that highlight the devastation . [online] EastMojo. Available at: https://www.eastmojo.com/news/2021/01/26/20-years-of-gujarat-earthquake-numbers-that-highlight-the-devastation/ [Accessed 9 Aug. 2021].

The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica (2019). Bhuj earthquake of 2001 | India. In: Encyclopædia Britannica . [online] Available at: https://www.britannica.com/event/Bhuj-earthquake-of-2001.

Kishore, R. and Ceo (n.d.). Reconstruction & Renewal of Bhuj City The Gujarat Earthquake Experience – Converting Adversity into an Opportunity a presentation by . [online] . Available at: https://www.urban-response.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/kishore-reconstruction—renewal-of-bhuj-city-bhuj-city.pdf [Accessed 9 Aug. 2021].

www.hcp.co.in. (n.d.). Bhuj Development Plan And Town Planning Scheme | HCP . [online] Available at: https://www.hcp.co.in/project/bhuj-development-plan-and-town-planning-scheme [Accessed 9 Aug. 2021].

Balachandran, B. (n.d.). The Reconstruction of Bhuj 1 – Reflecting on the Planning Process after a Decade. www.academia.edu . [online] Available at: https://www.academia.edu/32383576/The_Reconstruction_of_Bhuj_1_Reflecting_on_the_Planning_Process_after_a_Decade [Accessed 9 Aug. 2021].

Kanika Trivedi is an architect and a writer who believes in Design Activism. Architectural writing can be a strong means to spread awareness about the underlying issues in architecture fraternity. She also believes that a space is nothing without its context and so there is a lot to learn while you incessantly explore new circumstances and their interpretations.

10 COVID-19 architectural/design solutions from around the world

Architects in Lexington – Top 50 Architects in Lexington

Related posts.

Khayelitsha: Inside one of the biggest slums in South Africa

Heritage Hotel: Gleneagles

Smart Cities: Integrating Technology to Enhance Urban Living

Dharavi: Inside one of the biggest slums in India

Orangi Town: Inside one of the biggest slums in Pakistan

Roma: Inside one of the biggest slums in Europe

• Architectural Community
• Architectural Facts
• RTF Architectural Reviews
• Architectural styles
• City and Architecture
• Fun & Architecture
• History of Architecture
• Design Studio Portfolios
• Designing for typologies
• RTF Design Inspiration
• Architecture News
• Career Advice
• Case Studies
• Construction & Materials
• Covid and Architecture
• Interior Design
• Know Your Architects
• Landscape Architecture
• Materials & Construction
• Product Design
• RTF Fresh Perspectives
• Sustainable Architecture
• Top Architects
• Travel and Architecture
• Rethinking The Future Awards 2022
• RTF Awards 2021 | Results
• GADA 2021 | Results
• RTF Awards 2020 | Results
• ACD Awards 2020 | Results
• GADA 2019 | Results
• ACD Awards 2018 | Results
• GADA 2018 | Results
• RTF Awards 2017 | Results
• RTF Sustainability Awards 2017 | Results
• RTF Sustainability Awards 2016 | Results
• RTF Sustainability Awards 2015 | Results
• RTF Awards 2014 | Results
• RTF Architectural Visualization Competition 2020 – Results
• Architectural Photography Competition 2020 – Results
• Designer’s Days of Quarantine Contest – Results
• Urban Sketching Competition May 2020 – Results
• RTF Essay Writing Competition April 2020 – Results
• Architectural Photography Competition 2019 – Finalists
• The Ultimate Thesis Guide
• Introduction to Landscape Architecture
• Perfect Guide to Architecting Your Career
• How to Design Architecture Portfolio
• How to Design Streets
• Introduction to Urban Design
• Introduction to Product Design
• Complete Guide to Dissertation Writing
• Introduction to Skyscraper Design
• Educational
• Hospitality
• Institutional
• Office Buildings
• Public Building
• Residential
• Sports & Recreation
• Temporary Structure
• Commercial Interior Design
• Corporate Interior Design
• Healthcare Interior Design
• Hospitality Interior Design
• Residential Interior Design
• Sustainability
• Transportation
• Urban Design
• Host your Course with RTF
• Architectural Writing Training Programme | WFH
• Editorial Internship | In-office
• Graphic Design Internship
• Research Internship | WFH
• Research Internship | New Delhi
• RTF | About RTF
• Submit Your Story

Looking for Job/ Internship?

Rtf will connect you with right design studios.

You are using an outdated browser that is not supported by GeoNode.

Please use a modern browser like Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome or Safari.

Placeholder for status-message

Placeholder for status-message-body

The Bhuj, India Earthquake of 26 January 2001

Download the The Bhuj, India Earthquake of 26 January 2001 document

Title The Bhuj, India Earthquake of 26 January 2001 License Public Domain (PD) + Works in the public domain may be used freely without the permission of the former copyright owner. + For more info see http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-definitions.html . Abstract A powerful earthquake rocked the western state of Gujarat in India at 08:46 hours (Indian Standard Time) on the 26th January 2001. The earthquake was estimated by USGS to have a Moment Magnitude of 7.9. The epicentre was reported to be near a major town called Bhuj in the Kachchh region of Gujarat. Fig.1 shows the location of the epicentre. In Fig.2 the location of the state of Gujarat is highlighted on the political map of India. Initial reports in the media indicated extensive damage to the civil engineering structures followed by reports on loss of life on a massive scale. This region is known to be seismically active and has seen a major earthquake in 1819 which had a similar magnitude to the current earthquake. That earthquake occurred along the Allah Bund fault and resulted in a major uplift of the ground surface. Ground movements of up to 9m vertically and 3.5m horizontally were reported by Bilham (1998) to have occurred due to that earthquake. More recently a major earthquake of Moment Magnitude 7 occurred with its epicentre close to Anjar in 1956. Publication Date Jan. 1, 2005, 3:11 p.m. Category Geoscientific Information information pertaining to earth sciences. Examples: geophysical features and processes, geology, minerals, sciences dealing with the composition, structure and origin of the earth s rocks, risks of earthquakes, volcanic activity, landslides, gravity information, soils, permafrost, hydrogeology, erosion Regions India Responsible andy More info - Language English Supplemental Information No information provided

Share This Document

Comments (0 total).

Log in to add a comment

Average Rating

Log in to add/delete Favorites.

• Metadata Detail
• Download Document

Edit Document

Download metadata, full metadata.

• Text format
• HTML format

Standard Metadata - XML format

• Dublin Core

Resources using this document

This document is not related to any maps or layers

Responsible

Point of Contact

Metadata Author

Forgot Password?

Uploading...

Processing..., message box.

Some text in the modal.

• Scholarships
• Certificates
• Applications
• Communication

Report Writing on Earthquake for Students

Earthquakes are natural disasters that can cause widespread destruction and loss of life. India is no stranger to earthquakes, with the country experiencing its fair share of seismic activity over the years. In this blog post, we will be exploring the topic of report writing on earthquakes.

We will look at the different types of earthquakes that can occur in the country, the importance of having an effective earthquake response plan in place, and some tips on how to write a comprehensive report on an earthquake. Whether you are a student, journalist, or simply someone interested in learning more about earthquakes, this blog post is sure to have something for you.

Report Writing on Earthquake

A powerful earthquake with a magnitude of 7.1 on the Richter scale struck the city of Dharamshala in the northern Indian state of Himachal Pradesh on the evening of September 23. The earthquake caused widespread damage and panic among residents. Many people were injured, and property was damaged.

The epicenter of the earthquake was in the Kangra district, just a few kilometers from Dharamshala. The tremors were felt over 400 kilometers away in Delhi, as well as in neighboring countries like Nepal and Pakistan.

The quake struck around 6:45 p.m. local time, causing damage to many buildings, roads, and essential utilities such as water and electricity throughout the city. When it happened, some people were at home, while others were out on the streets.

People rushed out of their homes and office buildings in fear as a result of the earthquake. Many people spent the night outside, unable to return inside. To deal with the disaster , emergency services were quickly mobilized, and rescue and relief operations were launched in the affected areas. The aftershocks caused significant damage as well, with buildings collapsing and roads becoming impassable. The death toll remains unknown, but it is expected to be high.

The death toll from the earthquake had risen to over 200 as of September 24, with over 1,000 people reported injured. As rescue efforts continued, the number of casualties was expected to rise further.

The earthquake caused significant damage to the city’s infrastructure, including the destruction or damage of many roads and bridges. Due to the quake, the city’s airport was also closed, causing flight disruptions.

The Indian government has announced that it will provide financial assistance to earthquake victims and has dispatched teams of National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) personnel to assist with rescue and relief efforts.

The earthquake was a major shock to the people of Dharamshala, who are still reeling from its aftermath. Many people are now homeless and in need of basic necessities such as food, water, and medical care.

In the aftermath of the earthquake, the people of Dharamshala banded together to assist those who were affected. Volunteers and community groups are working tirelessly to help and support those in need.

It is critical that the government and other organizations continue to help those affected by the earthquake. It will take time for the city to fully recover from the disaster, but with the help of the community and the efforts of rescue and relief teams, it will eventually recover.

Write a Report on Bhuj Earthquake

The Bhuj earthquake was a devastating natural disaster that occurred on January 26, 2001, in the state of Gujarat, India. The earthquake had a magnitude of 7.7 on the Richter scale and was one of the strongest earthquakes ever recorded in India. It struck at 8:46 a.m. local time and was centered near the town of Bhuj, which is located in the Kutch District of Gujarat.

The earthquake caused widespread damage and loss of life throughout the region. In Bhuj alone, more than 20,000 people were killed and another 167,000 were injured. The quake also destroyed over 400,000 homes and displaced over 15 lakh people.

The earthquake was caused by the movement of the Indian tectonic plate against the Eurasian plate. The plates are constantly moving, but they are usually separated by a layer of rock called the lithosphere. When the plates grind against each other, they can cause earthquakes. In the case of the Bhuj earthquake, the Indian plate was moving northward at a rate of about 4 centimeters per year. This movement caused a rupture in the lithosphere, which resulted in the earthquake.

The earthquake caused significant damage to infrastructure in the region. Many roads and bridges were destroyed, making it difficult for rescue and relief efforts to reach the affected areas. In addition, many hospitals and medical facilities were damaged, making it difficult for injured people to receive medical treatment. The earthquake also disrupted water and electricity supplies, making it difficult for people to access clean water and power.

The Bhuj earthquake had a significant economic impact on the region. It disrupted economic activities, such as agriculture and tourism, and caused a significant loss of income for many people. The earthquake also destroyed many businesses and factories, which had a negative impact on the local economy.

The Indian government and international organizations provided relief and assistance to the affected communities. They provided food, water, shelter, and medical care to people in need. They also helped to rebuild homes, schools, and other infrastructure that was damaged in the earthquake.

The Bhuj earthquake was a devastating natural disaster that had a profound impact on the people and communities of Gujarat. It caused significant loss of life and property and disrupted economic activities in the region. But with help from the government and international groups, the communities that were hurt were able to get better and start over.

Shobhit is the founder of Ishiksha, content writer and educator who has been creating educational content since 2021. His writing covers topics like science, technology, and the humanities. When he isn't writing, Shobhit enjoys reading nonfiction, watching documentaries, and going on nature walks.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Home » General Knowledge » Everything About Bhuj Earthquake, 2001

Everything About Bhuj Earthquake, 2001

Table of Contents

The Bhuj Earthquake, or the Gujarat Earthquake, hit the land of Gujarat and surrounding regions on the morning of 26 January 2001 at 8:46 IST. Regarded as one of the most devastating earthquakes in the History of India, Bhuj earthquake magnitude was of 7.7 and claimed around 13,805 to 20,023 lives, leaving another 167,000 injured and destroying nearly 340,000 buildings. The epicentre (23.6°N latitude and 69.8°E longitude) was located around 9 km southwest of the village of Chobari in Bhachau Taluka of Kutch (Kachchh) District or 20 km from Bhuj. The duration of the earthquake was 90 seconds, but the tremendous shocks for 90 seconds were enough to claim thousands of lives and cause property loss of around $ 1.3 billion . That is why the Bhuj earthquake 2001 case study is often cited worldwide in seismology and disaster management courses. It serves as a sudden reminder of the Earth’s unpredictable nature and the need for robust disaster preparedness plans. This event led to significant changes in India’s approach to disaster management, emphasizing the importance of earthquake-resistant construction and early warning systems.

Trauma Of 2001 Gujarat Earthquake That Lasts To This Day

The psychological impact on survivors of the 2001 Gujarat earthquake is profound. Many still have post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression. The event shattered the sense of security for entire communities, leaving emotional scars that are hard to heal. Bhuj situated a mere 20 km from the epicentre, faced immense destruction, with around 40% of its homes demolished, eight schools, two hospitals, and 4 km of its roads.

The city’s revered Swaminarayan temple and historic forts, Prag Mahal and Aina Mahal, also suffered significant damage. Across the region, nearly 340,000 buildings were either destroyed or damaged. In the district of Kutch, the earthquake obliterated about 60% of food and water supplies and approximately 258,000 houses, accounting for 90% of the district’s housing stock.

The enduring effects extend to infrastructure as well. Even two decades later, some areas in Gujarat are still recovering, for example, Kutch, Surat, Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar, and Rajkot districts. Buildings remain in ruins, serving as constant reminders of the disaster. The earthquake in Kutch in 2001 disrupted local economies and led to a decline in the quality of life for many.

Seismic Zone of Bhuj Earthquake

The Indian subcontinent is prone to earthquakes due to the movement of the Indian plate into Asia. As per reports, nearly 58% of India’s land is vulnerable to earthquakes. India’s latest seismic zoning map divides the country into four seismic zones: Zone 2, 3, 4, and 5. Zone 2 is classified as the Low Damage Risk Zone, associated with the lowest level of seismicity, while Zone 5, expecting the highest level of seismicity, is the High Damage Risk Zone. Regions in Zone 5 include Bhuj, Kashmir, the Western and Central Himalayas, North and Middle Bihar, the North-East Indian region, the Rann of Kutch, and the Andaman and Nicobar islands. Notably, areas with trap or basaltic rock are especially prone to earthquakes.

Moreover, Gujarat lies around 300-400 km from the plate boundary between the Indian and Eurasian plates.

However, the effects of continuing continental collision along this boundary still govern the current tectonics. The region experienced rifting with a roughly west-east trend during the break of the Gondwana in the Jurassic period.

During the collision with Eurasia, the area underwent shortening involving both reactivation of the original rift faults and the development of new low-angle thrust faults. The related folding caused the formation of ranges in the Central Kutch.

Memorial Sites of Bhuj Earthquake

Remembrance of the tragedy is important in acknowledging those who lost their lives and celebrating survivors’ strengths. Various memorials and museums have been built to remember the tragic natural disaster and all the lives lost. Below is a table describing some of these memorial sites:

These sites are a constant reminder of the 2001 Gujarat earthquake’s impact and the need for continued vigilance in disaster preparedness. They offer a space for reflection and education, helping to ensure that the lessons learned are passed onto future generations.

Bhuj Earthquake 2001 Case Study

The Bhuj earthquake of 2001 was one of the most devastating natural disasters in India’s history. The case study on Bhuj earthquake aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the event, its causes, and its impact on the region.

Bhuj Earthquake Report

On January 26, 2001, the Indian state of Gujarat was struck by a catastrophic earthquake with a moment magnitude of 7.7. The epicenter was near the town of Bhuj, hence the name Bhuj earthquake. The earthquake resulted in the death of more than 20,000 people, injured another 167,000, and caused extensive damage to property.

Bhuj Earthquake Causes

The Bhuj earthquake causes can be traced back to tectonic activities in the region. The earthquake occurred at the convergent plate boundary between the Indian Plate and the Eurasian Plate. The Indian Plate is moving northwards at a rate of about 5 cm per year and is being subducted beneath the Eurasian Plate. This subduction leads to a build-up of stress along the fault lines, which was eventually released in the form of the Bhuj earthquake.

In brief, the Bhuj earthquake case study serves as a stark reminder of the destructive power of natural disasters. It underscores the importance of effective disaster management strategies and the need for continued research into earthquake prediction and mitigation.

Affected Areas and the Impact by the Bhuj Earthquake

The effects of the Bhuj Earthquake extended across both urban and rural areas. The epicenter was near Bhuj in the Kutch district, but the tremors occurred throughout Gujarat. High-rise buildings in areas such as Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar crumbled down, leading to the destruction of infrastructure. Villages near the earthquake’s epic center were largely wiped out in rural areas. Some of the hardest hit included Bhuj, Anjar, and Bhachau, all falling within the Kutch district. Besides, the south-eastern region of Pakistan was also affected.

Causes of the Bhuj Earthquake

The 2001 Gujarat Earthquake was caused by movement on a previously unknown south-dipping fault, trending parallel to the inferred rift structures. Classifying as a blind thrust earthquake, it had no major surface ruptures associated with the shock. Additionally, lateral spreading was mostly reported, and strike-slip faulting was noticed at Bharodia and Manfara. The Bhuj earthquake was a relatively shallow-focus quake at a depth of about 16 km. The earthquake was highly intense, thus resulting in serious ground shaking that greatly affected society.

Effects of the Bhuj Earthquake

The 2001 Bhuj earthquake wasn’t just a tremor – it was a catastrophe that left a lasting scar on the region. Beyond the immediate collapse of buildings, the earthquake triggered a devastating chain reaction impacting lives, infrastructure, and the very spirit of the affected communities.

Widespread Infrastructure Damage:

• Essential services disrupted: Schools, hospitals, and critical infrastructure like roads and bridges were severely damaged or destroyed, hindering access to basic necessities and stalling recovery efforts.
• Loss of utilities: Water supply and electricity lines were heavily compromised, leaving survivors struggling with sanitation and hampered communication.

Environmental Destruction:

• Land transformed: The earthquake caused soil liquefaction and landslides, altering the landscape and rendering some areas uninhabitable.

Socioeconomic Turmoil:

• Livelihoods lost: With businesses and farmlands destroyed, unemployment surged, pushing communities into financial hardship.
• Displacement and resettlement: Many became homeless, living in temporary shelters and facing challenges in rebuilding permanent residences.
• Economic burden: The earthquake inflicted an estimated $7.5 billion in property damage, impacting both the regional and national economies.
• Health crisis: Lack of clean water and proper sanitation in temporary settlements led to a rise in diseases, straining healthcare resources.

Shattered Lives:

• Education disrupted: Schools were forced to shut down, hindering children’s access to education and creating long-term setbacks.
• Mental health impact: Survivors grappled with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), experiencing anxiety and depression for extended periods.
• Cultural loss: Historical sites and monuments were not spared, damaging the cultural heritage of the region.

Rescue and Relief Efforts

The 2001 Bhuj earthquake, measuring 7.7 in magnitude, caused more than 13,805 fatalities and damaged approximately 340,000 buildings . In response:

• Immediate Aid: The Indian army then moved in and, with the help of the International Federation of the Red Cross, built a temporary hospital at Bhuj.
• Assistance from Organizations: American Red Cross, CARE International, HelpAge India, Oxfam, WHO, Technisches Hilfswerk, and the Department of International Development provided the necessary relief funds in the time of need.
• Reconstruction: The government of Gujarat came up with policies that targeted reconstructing homes, restoring public buildings and revamping the economy. This approach took a communal form of relocating individuals or providing for in-situ reconstruction.
• International Support: Numerous countries, like Australia, the USA, Israel, Japan, and China contributed to relief and rescue aid.

Gujarat Earthquake 2001 Facts

Here are some key Gujarat earthquake 2001 facts:

• Magnitude and Duration: The earthquake had a moment magnitude of 7.7, equivalent to 6.9 on the Richter scale. The shaking lasted for over two minutes.
• Aftershocks: There were thousands of aftershocks recorded in the months following the main quake, some of which were of significant magnitude.
• Damage: The earthquake caused extensive damage to property. Over 400,000 homes were destroyed, leaving about 600,000 people homeless.
• Response: The response to the earthquake involved massive rescue and rehabilitation efforts from the Indian government, international agencies, and non-governmental organizations.
• Long-term Impact: The earthquake had a significant long-term impact on the region. It led to changes in policies related to disaster management and prompted improvements in building codes and practices.

Earthquake in Bhuj Today

There haven’t been any reports of major earthquakes in Bhuj, Gujarat, India, today, May 3rd, 2024. Fortunately, reliable sources like the Government of India’s Institute of Seismological Research (ISR) and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) haven’t indicated any significant seismic activity in the region.

How to Stay Informed:

• Government Websites: You can visit the official website of the Institute of Seismological Research (ISR), Gujarat: https://isr.gujarat.gov.in/ for the latest earthquake reports specific to Gujarat.
• USGS Earthquake Hazards Program: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) Earthquake Hazards Program website provides real-time earthquake information globally: https://www.usgs.gov/programs/earthquake-hazards/earthquakes

It’s always a good practice to be prepared for earthquakes, even if there are no immediate threats. Here are some resources that can help:

• Disaster Management Authority of India: https://ndma.gov.in/
• Ready.gov – Earthquake Preparedness: https://www.ready.gov/sites/default/files/2021-12/ready_earthquake-information-sheet.pdf

The Bhuj earthquake serves as a sad and serious reminder of the devastating power of natural disasters. Architects design earthquake-resistant structures to minimize damage during seismic events. While no building can be fully earthquake-proof, modern engineering aims to enhance resilience. Today, engineers employ advanced techniques such as base isolation and structural vibration control to reduce earthquake-induced forces and deformations while also strengthening structures. Such innovations ensure that buildings not only withstand quakes but also sustain minimal damage.

Also Read :-

Earthquake in India: An Overview

Nepal Earthquake 2015: An Overview

The Worst Earthquake in History: A Terrifying Look Back

Along with the Bhuj Earthquake , Read the related articles by visiting the above links.

To learn more about the geological causes of the earthquake, you can refer to the bhuj earthquake pdf . Additionally, a news video from 26 january 2001 bhuj earthquake video , showcasing the aftermath of the earthquake.

Frequently Asked Questions:

The Bhuj earthquake, often called the 2001 Gujarat earthquake, struck on 26 January 2001. Bhuj earthquake magnitude was 7.7, it affected parts of Gujarat, especially Bhuj. The earthquake resulted in approximately 20,000 deaths and left over 167,000 injured.

A tectonic shift along a fault in the Earth’s crust caused the earthquake. This seismic event originated around 16 km beneath the surface, causing widespread destruction.

The Bhuj Earthquake 2001 case study noted that traditional structures like “bhungas” survived better than modern buildings. It has led to a re-evaluation of indigenous architecture versus modern construction techniques.

After the earthquake, authorities undertook extensive rehabilitation and rebuilding programs. Thanks to foreign aid and government initiatives, Gujarat has been able to rebuild infrastructure and homes. Engineers have adopted new earthquake-resistant techniques.

The Bhuj earthquake, which occurred in 2001, resulted in the deaths of more than 20,000 people.

The Bhuj earthquake had a moment magnitude of 7.7, which is equivalent to 6.9 on the Richter scale.

The Bhuj earthquake was a natural disaster caused by tectonic activities. It occurred at the convergent plate boundary between the Indian Plate and the Eurasian Plate.

The Gujarat earthquake of 2001 lasted for over two minutes. However, there are also sources that mention the earthquake lasted for around 90 seconds or 110 seconds.

Skip the Interview

Got a question on this topic?

• Privacy Policy
• Chegg Study
• Learn a language
• Writing Support
• Expert Hiring and Payment Dashboard
• पैसे कैसे कमाए? Earn Online
• Career Guidance
• General Knowledge
• Web Stories

Chegg India does not ask for money to offer any opportunity with the company. We request you to be vigilant before sharing your personal and financial information with any third party. Beware of fraudulent activities claiming affiliation with our company and promising monetary rewards or benefits. Chegg India shall not be responsible for any losses resulting from such activities.

• Chegg Inc. Compliance

© 2024 Chegg Inc. All rights reserved.