literature review outline psychology

In order to help minimize spread of the coronavirus and protect our campus community, Cowles Library is adjusting our services, hours, and building access. Read more...

• Research, Study, Learning
• Archives & Special Collections

• Cowles Library
• Find Journal Articles
• Find Articles in Related Disciplines
• Find Streaming Video
• Conducting a Literature Review
• Organizations, Associations, Societies
• For Faculty

What is a Literature Review?

Description.

A literature review, also called a review article or review of literature, surveys the existing research on a topic. The term "literature" in this context refers to published research or scholarship in a particular discipline, rather than "fiction" (like American Literature) or an individual work of literature. In general, literature reviews are most common in the sciences and social sciences.

Literature reviews may be written as standalone works, or as part of a scholarly article or research paper. In either case, the purpose of the review is to summarize and synthesize the key scholarly work that has already been done on the topic at hand. The literature review may also include some analysis and interpretation. A literature review is  not  a summary of every piece of scholarly research on a topic.

Why are literature reviews useful?

Literature reviews can be very helpful for newer researchers or those unfamiliar with a field by synthesizing the existing research on a given topic, providing the reader with connections and relationships among previous scholarship. Reviews can also be useful to veteran researchers by identifying potentials gaps in the research or steering future research questions toward unexplored areas. If a literature review is part of a scholarly article, it should include an explanation of how the current article adds to the conversation. (From: https://researchguides.drake.edu/englit/criticism)

How is a literature review different from a research article?

Research articles: "are empirical articles that describe one or several related studies on a specific, quantitative, testable research question....they are typically organized into four text sections: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion." Source: https://psych.uw.edu/storage/writing_center/litrev.pdf)

Steps for Writing a Literature Review

1. Identify and define the topic that you will be reviewing.

The topic, which is commonly a research question (or problem) of some kind, needs to be identified and defined as clearly as possible.  You need to have an idea of what you will be reviewing in order to effectively search for references and to write a coherent summary of the research on it.  At this stage it can be helpful to write down a description of the research question, area, or topic that you will be reviewing, as well as to identify any keywords that you will be using to search for relevant research.

2. Conduct a Literature Search

Use a range of keywords to search databases such as PsycINFO and any others that may contain relevant articles.  You should focus on peer-reviewed, scholarly articles . In SuperSearch and most databases, you may find it helpful to select the Advanced Search mode and include "literature review" or "review of the literature" in addition to your other search terms.  Published books may also be helpful, but keep in mind that peer-reviewed articles are widely considered to be the “gold standard” of scientific research.  Read through titles and abstracts, select and obtain articles (that is, download, copy, or print them out), and save your searches as needed. Most of the databases you will need are linked to from the Cowles Library Psychology Research guide .

3. Read through the research that you have found and take notes.

Absorb as much information as you can.  Read through the articles and books that you have found, and as you do, take notes.  The notes should include anything that will be helpful in advancing your own thinking about the topic and in helping you write the literature review (such as key points, ideas, or even page numbers that index key information).  Some references may turn out to be more helpful than others; you may notice patterns or striking contrasts between different sources; and some sources may refer to yet other sources of potential interest.  This is often the most time-consuming part of the review process.  However, it is also where you get to learn about the topic in great detail. You may want to use a Citation Manager to help you keep track of the citations you have found. 

4. Organize your notes and thoughts; create an outline.

At this stage, you are close to writing the review itself.  However, it is often helpful to first reflect on all the reading that you have done.  What patterns stand out?  Do the different sources converge on a consensus?  Or not?  What unresolved questions still remain?  You should look over your notes (it may also be helpful to reorganize them), and as you do, to think about how you will present this research in your literature review.  Are you going to summarize or critically evaluate?  Are you going to use a chronological or other type of organizational structure?  It can also be helpful to create an outline of how your literature review will be structured.

5. Write the literature review itself and edit and revise as needed.

The final stage involves writing.  When writing, keep in mind that literature reviews are generally characterized by a  summary style  in which prior research is described sufficiently to explain critical findings but does not include a high level of detail (if readers want to learn about all the specific details of a study, then they can look up the references that you cite and read the original articles themselves).  However, the degree of emphasis that is given to individual studies may vary (more or less detail may be warranted depending on how critical or unique a given study was).   After you have written a first draft, you should read it carefully and then edit and revise as needed.  You may need to repeat this process more than once.  It may be helpful to have another person read through your draft(s) and provide feedback.

6. Incorporate the literature review into your research paper draft. (note: this step is only if you are using the literature review to write a research paper. Many times the literature review is an end unto itself).

After the literature review is complete, you should incorporate it into your research paper (if you are writing the review as one component of a larger paper).  Depending on the stage at which your paper is at, this may involve merging your literature review into a partially complete Introduction section, writing the rest of the paper around the literature review, or other processes.

These steps were taken from: https://psychology.ucsd.edu/undergraduate-program/undergraduate-resources/academic-writing-resources/writing-research-papers/writing-lit-review.html#6.-Incorporate-the-literature-r

• << Previous: Find Streaming Video
• Next: Organizations, Associations, Societies >>
• Last Updated: May 31, 2024 4:22 PM
• URL: https://researchguides.drake.edu/psychology

• 2507 University Avenue
• Des Moines, IA 50311
• (515) 271-2111

Trouble finding something? Try searching , or check out the Get Help page.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Psychology - How to Write a Literature Review

Subject guide.

What is a literature review? 

A literature review discusses published research studies on a specific topic or subject area.  

What is the purpose of writing it?

The goal of the lit review is to describe, summarize, and evaluate previous research in a given area.  It should explain important conclusions about your topic as well as identify any gaps in the research or areas for future study.

Choose a Topic and Find Articles

Choose a topic that interests you and remember to keep an open mind.  Depending on how much research there is, you may need to narrow or broaden your topic.  

• PsycArticles This link opens in a new window Scholarly journal articles on psychology topics.
• ProQuest Central This link opens in a new window The largest single periodical resource available, bringing together complete databases across all major subject areas, including Business, Health and Medical, Social Sciences, Education, Science and Technology, and Humanities.
• Google Scholar Search for scholarly articles and books. Be aware that the full text may not always be available.

Read the Articles

You want to read and understand each of your articles.  A good starting point is to answer these 3 questions about each article:

1. What was the study's research question?  In other words, what were they trying to find out?

2. What was the study's method?  Briefly describe HOW they collected data and WHO their participant group was.

3. What do the results mean?  Or what conclusions can we draw from the results?

Write the Lit Review

Connect:   Think about what YOUR research question is for your lit review.  Each article you found should connect to your topic/theme in some way and you should be able to describe your topic as a research question and your articles as answers to that question.  Your summary for each article should show how they further our knowledge in relation to your topic.

Organize:   Can you organize your articles into a few distinct groups?  It could be by treatment method or age/ethnic group or other factor.  The way you organize will depend on your topic and the research, but it will help you if you can group articles in some way.  

Analyze:  Think beyond just summary and about what we still don't know about this topic.  Are there gaps in the research?  Do too many studies use just one method of gathering data?  What else is important to know?  The "Discussion" section of your articles may help guide you in your analysis.

Additional Sources

• College Drinking Games Literature Review Lit Review published in a scholarly journal. Good example of how lit reviews work in the field.
• How to Write a Literature Review from Psychology in Action Good advice on choosing a topic and searching for articles.
• Writing a Literature Review in Psychology from University of Washington Helpful info on all aspects of writing a lit review. Great resource.
• Literature Reviews from UNC Chapel Hill Writing Center This is not specific to Psychology, but has good tips on organizing your paper.
• Next: APA >>
• Last Updated: Oct 18, 2023 11:21 AM
• URL: https://bergen.libguides.com/litreview

Last updated 20/06/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings .

Login Alert

• > The Psychologist's Companion
• > Writing a Literature Review

Book contents

• Frontmatter
• Acknowledgments
• Introduction
• Part I Macro-Challenges in Writing Papers: Planning and Formulating Papers
• 1 Eight Common Misconceptions about Psychology Papers
• 2 How to Generate, Evaluate, and Sell Your Ideas for Research and Papers
• 3 Literature Research
• 4 Writing a Literature Review
• 5 Planning and Writing the Experimental Research Paper
• 6 Ethics in Research and Writing
• Part II Micro-Challenges in Writing Papers: Presenting Your Ideas in Writing
• Part III Writing and Preparing Articles for Journal Submission
• Part IV Presenting Yourself to Others

4 - Writing a Literature Review

from Part I - Macro-Challenges in Writing Papers: Planning and Formulating Papers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

Most undergraduate research papers, and many graduate and professional research papers as well, are based on literature reviews. The aims of a literature review are different from those of an empirical research paper, and hence the skills required differ somewhat as well. The goals of literature reviews are the following (American Psychological Association, 2009):

1. To define and clarify problems

2. To inform the reader about a subject by summarizing and evaluating studies

3. To identify inconsistencies, gaps, contradictions, and relationships in the literature

4. To suggest future steps and approaches to solve the issues identified

There are five kinds of literature reviews that can be distinguished on the basis of the aim of the review. Reviews can strive to (a) generate new knowledge, (b) test theories, (c) integrate theories, (d) develop a new theory, or (e) integrate existing knowledge.

If you plan to submit your literature review to a journal and have to decide where to submit it, you may want to read some literature reviews that have been published in the journals you are considering to find out whether your paper is a good fit to the journal. Generally, the probability of an article being accepted is highest when you develop new knowledge, a new theory, or integrate several theories (instead of just reviewing and summarizing the literature on a particular topic) (Eisenberg, 2000). In general, the best literature reviews do not merely summarize literature; they also create new knowledge by placing the literature into a new framework or at least seeing the literature in a new way.

The literature review can proceed smoothly if you follow a sequence of simple steps:

1. Decide on a topic for a paper.

2. Organize and search the literature.

3. Prepare an outline.

4. Write the paper.

5. Evaluate the paper yourself and seek others’ feedback on it.

DECIDING ON A TOPIC FOR A PAPER

Your first task is to decide on a topic for a paper. This is, in a sense, the most important task because the paper can be no better than the topic. We have found five mistakes that repeatedly turn up in writers’ choices of topics:

1. The topic doesn't interest the writer.

2. The topic is too easy or too safe for the writer.

3. The topic is too difficult for the writer.

4. There is inadequate literature on the topic.

5. The topic is too broad.

Access options

Save book to kindle.

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle .

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service .

• Writing a Literature Review
• Robert J. Sternberg , Cornell University, New York , Karin Sternberg , Cornell University, New York
• Book: The Psychologist's Companion
• Online publication: 24 November 2016
• Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316488935.006

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox .

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive .

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing a Literature Review

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.

Where, when, and why would I write a lit review?

There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.

A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.

Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.

What are the parts of a lit review?

Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.

Introduction:

• An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
• A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
• Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published, standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research paper)
• Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.

Conclusion:

• Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance
• Connect it back to your primary research question

How should I organize my lit review?

Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:

• Chronological : The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
• Thematic : If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women.
• Qualitative versus quantitative research
• Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources
• Theoretical : In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research.

What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review?

Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .

As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.

Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:

• It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
• Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying to each other?
• Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often
• Read more about synthesis here.

The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.

• University of La Verne
• Subject Guides

PSY 306: Cognitive Psychology

• Literature Reviews
• Find Articles
• What is a Literature Review?
• Literature Review Resources
• Literature Review Books
• The 5 Steps to Writing a Literature Review
• APA Citations
• Organize Citations
• A literature review is a critical, analytical summary and synthesis of the current knowledge of a topic. As a researcher, you collect the available literature on a topic, and then select the literature that is most relevant for your purpose. Your written literature review summarizes and analyses the themes, topics, methods, and results of that literature in order to inform the reader about the history and current status of research on that topic.

What purpose does a literature review serve?

• The literature review informs the reader of the researcher's knowledge of the relevant research already conducted on the topic under discussion, and places the author's current study in context of previous studies.
• As part of a senior project, the literature review points out the current issues and questions concerning a topic. By relating the your research to a knowledge gap in the existing literature, you should demonstrate how his or her proposed research will contribute to expanding knowledge in that field.
• Short Literature Review Sample This literature review sample guides students from the thought process to a finished review.
• Literature Review Matrix (Excel Doc) Excel file that can be edited to suit your needs.
• Literature Review Matrix (PDF) Source: McLean, Lindsey. "Literature Review." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2015. https://www.projectcora.org/assignment/literature-review.
• Academic Writer (formerly APA Style Central) This link opens in a new window Academic Writer (formerly APA Style Central) features three independent but integrated centers that provide expert resources necessary for teaching, learning, and applying the rules of APA Style.
• Sample Literature Reviews: Univ. of West Florida Literature review guide from the University of West Florida library guides.
• Purdue University Online Writing Lab (OWL) Sample literature review in APA from Purdue University's Online Writing Lab (OWL)

• << Previous: Find Articles
• Next: APA Citations >>
• Last Updated: Jun 13, 2024 11:44 AM
• URL: https://laverne.libguides.com/psy306

University Library

• Research Guides
• Literature Reviews
• Finding Articles
• Finding Books and Media
• Research Methods, Tests, and Statistics
• Citations and APA Style
• Annotated Bibliographies
• Other Resources
• According to Science
• The Scientific Process
• Activity: Scholarly Party

What is a Literature Review?

The scholarly conversation.

A literature review provides an overview of previous research on a topic that critically evaluates, classifies, and compares what has already been published on a particular topic. It allows the author to synthesize and place into context the research and scholarly literature relevant to the topic. It helps map the different approaches to a given question and reveals patterns. It forms the foundation for the author’s subsequent research and justifies the significance of the new investigation.

A literature review can be a short introductory section of a research article or a report or policy paper that focuses on recent research. Or, in the case of dissertations, theses, and review articles, it can be an extensive review of all relevant research.

• The format is usually a bibliographic essay; sources are briefly cited within the body of the essay, with full bibliographic citations at the end.
• The introduction should define the topic and set the context for the literature review. It will include the author's perspective or point of view on the topic, how they have defined the scope of the topic (including what's not included), and how the review will be organized. It can point out overall trends, conflicts in methodology or conclusions, and gaps in the research.
• In the body of the review, the author should organize the research into major topics and subtopics. These groupings may be by subject, (e.g., globalization of clothing manufacturing), type of research (e.g., case studies), methodology (e.g., qualitative), genre, chronology, or other common characteristics. Within these groups, the author can then discuss the merits of each article and analyze and compare the importance of each article to similar ones.
• The conclusion will summarize the main findings, make clear how this review of the literature supports (or not) the research to follow, and may point the direction for further research.
• The list of references will include full citations for all of the items mentioned in the literature review.

Key Questions for a Literature Review

A literature review should try to answer questions such as

• Who are the key researchers on this topic?
• What has been the focus of the research efforts so far and what is the current status?
• How have certain studies built on prior studies? Where are the connections? Are there new interpretations of the research?
• Have there been any controversies or debate about the research? Is there consensus? Are there any contradictions?
• Which areas have been identified as needing further research? Have any pathways been suggested?
• How will your topic uniquely contribute to this body of knowledge?
• Which methodologies have researchers used and which appear to be the most productive?
• What sources of information or data were identified that might be useful to you?
• How does your particular topic fit into the larger context of what has already been done?
• How has the research that has already been done help frame your current investigation ?

Examples of Literature Reviews

Example of a literature review at the beginning of an article: Forbes, C. C., Blanchard, C. M., Mummery, W. K., & Courneya, K. S. (2015, March). Prevalence and correlates of strength exercise among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors . Oncology Nursing Forum, 42(2), 118+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.sonoma.idm.oclc.org/ps/i.do?p=HRCA&sw=w&u=sonomacsu&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA422059606&asid=27e45873fddc413ac1bebbc129f7649c Example of a comprehensive review of the literature: Wilson, J. L. (2016). An exploration of bullying behaviours in nursing: a review of the literature.   British Journal Of Nursing ,  25 (6), 303-306. For additional examples, see:

Galvan, J., Galvan, M., & ProQuest. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (Seventh ed.). [Electronic book]

Pan, M., & Lopez, M. (2008). Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Pub. [ Q180.55.E9 P36 2008]

Useful Links

• Write a Literature Review (UCSC)
• Literature Reviews (Purdue)
• Literature Reviews: overview (UNC)
• Review of Literature (UW-Madison)

Evidence Matrix for Literature Reviews

The  Evidence Matrix  can help you  organize your research  before writing your lit review.  Use it to  identify patterns  and commonalities in the articles you have found--similar methodologies ?  common  theoretical frameworks ? It helps you make sure that all your major concepts covered. It also helps you see how your research fits into the context  of the overall topic.

• Evidence Matrix Special thanks to Dr. Cindy Stearns, SSU Sociology Dept, for permission to use this Matrix as an example.
• << Previous: Citations and APA Style
• Next: Annotated Bibliographies >>
• Last Updated: Jan 8, 2024 2:58 PM
• URL: https://libguides.sonoma.edu/psychology

• SUNY Oswego, Penfield Library
• Resource Guides

Psychology Research Guide

• Literature Reviews
• Research Starters
• Find Tests and Measures

Conducting Literature Reviews

Finding literature reviews in psycinfo, more help on conducting literature reviews.

• How to Read a Scientific Article
• Citing Sources
• Peer Review

Quick Links

• Penfield Library
• Research Guides
• A-Z List of Databases & Indexes

The APA definition of a literature review (from http://www.apa.org/databases/training/method-values.html ):

 Survey of previously published literature on a particular topic to define and clarify a particular problem; summarize previous investigations; and to identify relations, contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies in the literature, and suggest the next step in solving the problem.

 Literature Reviews should:

• Key concepts that are being researched
• The areas that are ripe for more research—where the gaps and inconsistencies in the literature are
• A critical analysis of research that has been previously conducted
• Will include primary and secondary research
• Be selective—you’ll review many sources, so pick the most important parts of the articles/books.
• Introduction: Provides an overview of your topic, including the major problems and issues that have been studied.
• Discussion of Methodologies:   If there are different types of studies conducted, identifying what types of studies have been conducted is often provided.
• Identification and Discussion of Studies: Provide overview of major studies conducted, and if there have been follow-up studies, identify whether this has supported or disproved results from prior studies.
• Identification of Themes in Literature: If there has been different themes in the literature, these are also discussed in literature reviews.   For example, if you were writing a review of treatment of OCD, cognitive-behavioral therapy and drug therapy would be themes to discuss.
• Conclusion/Discussion—Summarize what you’ve found in your review of literature, and identify areas in need of further research or gaps in the literature.

Because literature reviews are a major part of research in psychology, Psycinfo allows you to easily limit to literature reviews.  In the advanced search screen, you can select "literature review" as the methodology.

Now all you'll need to do is enter your search terms, and your results should show you many literature reviews conducted by professionals on your topic.

When you find an literature review article that is relevant to your topic, you should look at who the authors cite and who is citing the author, so that you can begin to use their research to help you locate sources and conduct your own literature review.  The best way to do that is to use the "Cited References" and "Times Cited" links in Psycinfo, which is pictured below.

This article on procrastination has 423 references, and 48 other articles in psycinfo are citing this literature review.  And, the citations are either available in full text or to request through ILL.  Check out  the article "The Nature of Procrastination" to see how these features work.

By searching for existing literature reviews, and then using the references of those literature reviews to begin your own literature search, you can efficiently gather the best research on a topic.  You'll want to keep in mind that you'll need to summarize and analyze the articles you read, and won't be able to use every single article you choose.

You can use the search box below to get started.

Adelphi Library's tutorial, Conducting a Literature Review in Education and the Behavioral Sciences covers how to gather sources from library databases for your literature review.

The University of Toronto also provides "A Few Tips on Conducting a Literature Review" that offers some good advice and questions to ask when conducting a literature review.

Purdue University's Online Writing Lab (OWL) has several resources that discuss literature reviews: 

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/666/01/

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/994/04/   (for grad students, but is still offers some good tips and advice for anyone writing a literature review)

Journal articles (covers more than 1,700 periodicals), chapters, books, dissertations and reports on psychology and related fields.

• PsycINFO This link opens in a new window
• << Previous: Handbooks
• Next: How to Read a Scientific Article >>

Writing a Literature Review

• What is a Literature Review
• Research Topic | Research Questions
• Outline (Example)
• What Types of Literature Should I Use in My Review?
• Project Planner: Literature Review
• Writing a Literature Review in Psychology
• Literature Review tips (video)

Creating an Outline

The creation of an outline is an invaluable tool in the process of writing a research paper. It will give structure to the fledgling paper and allow you to better imagine what you will need to write. Breaking the paper down into small sections also makes the process of writing far less overwhelming.

After choosing an appropriate topic and writing a thesis statement, you will need to brainstorm to get ideas on how to best support your thesis. The length of your paper will determine the level of detail you should pursue in your supporting content. When you have honed the results of your brainstorming down to a suitable number of subtopics, you can arrange them in the order you feel would be most effective in arguing your thesis statement.

Below is a diagram that can be used for outlining your paper.

In the first box, you add your Broad Topic. Then in the second box, you add your Related Topics. In the third box, you should include at least 3 papers that support your Related Topics.

Download Graph 

You can download the image above here .

Alphanumeric Outline

Outline recipe.

1.  Introduction

      A. Introductory Statement

      B. Thesis Statement

2.  Body

      A. First Subtopic

        a.  supporting evidence

      B. Second Subtopic

      C. Third Subtopic

3.  Conclusion

      A Restatement of Thesis

      B. Compelling Conclusion

Alphanumeric research paper outline example

• Michael Jordan
• Career Highlights
• Six NBA Championships
• Six NBA Finals MVP
• US Olympics Basketball Team
• 1984 Gold Medalist
• 1992 Gold Medalist
• Fourteen NBA All-Star Game selections
• Three NBA All-Star Game MVP Awards
• Achievements
• Record-holder scoring average
• Regular season (30.12 points per game)
• Playoffs (33.45 points per game)
• Other accolades
• 1996 Space Jam
• Owner of Charlotte Hornets
• LeBron James
• Four NBA Championships
• Four NBA Finals MVP
• 2008 Gold Medalist
• 2012 Gold Medalist
• Eighteen NBA All-Star Game selections
• Philanthropy
• LeBron James Family Foundation
• Social activism
• 2021 Space Jam
• First player to accumulate $1 billion as an active player
• Analysis and Discussion
• Of course, Michael Jordan is better
• << Previous: Research Topic | Research Questions
• Next: What Types of Literature Should I Use in My Review? >>
• Last Updated: Apr 4, 2024 1:35 PM
• URL: https://gbc.libguides.com/literature_review

Literature Review Outline: Examples, Approaches, & Templates

A literature review is an update on the status of current research related to the issue in question . Its purpose is to provide the reader with a guide to a particular research topic. And for the writer, a well-written literature review is the best way to show their competence in the field.

As with any other academic paper, the key to a successful literature review is its outline. Below you’ll find great tips for creating a perfect one. See where you can place your thesis statement in the introduction and when it’s time to reference sources. And you can examine an example of a literature review outline (APA format). Just keep reading this article prepared by Custom-writing experts!

• 🔭 General Information
• 📑 Main Approaches
• 🗺️ Mapping the Concepts
• ✍️ Writing Tips

🔗 References

🔭 literature review outline: general information.

Literature reviews are written mostly in sciences and social sciences, and sometimes in humanities. A literature review aims to discuss published information on the studies in a particular area. The most simple version of a literature review can be a mere summary of the sources. However, it usually features an organizational pattern and implies not only summary but also synthesis.

A literature review aims to provide a reader with a clear and understandable guide to a particular research topic. And for its writer, a solid review is an excellent opportunity to show them as an expert in a chosen field.

As MLA, Chicago, or APA style cover page generators help students with the very first part of any paper, the key to a successful literature review is a good outline . When planning a literature review, remember that no matter whether you’re dealing with a Chicago, MLA, or APA literature review outline, you’ll have to remember several important things.

📑 Literature Review Outline: Approaches to Structuring

A well-formed vision of the writing strategy before you start the main body paragraphs is half of the success. There are four approaches to arranging a literature review. Depending on the intended length of your paper, you can combine some or all of them. For instance, more than often, thematic and methodological strategies comprise a theoretical approach when it comes to details.

Chronological Approach

Tracing the reviewed works in succession, starting with the earliest available materials, is the easiest way to examine the specific topic. Be careful not to list the works in chronological order with their summaries. The purpose of such a review is to find out the key patterns, central debates, and turning points of the prevailing opinion at specific periods.

Here is a sample to make the approach clear. If the first available source dates 1995, and the most recent one was written in 2017, divide your analysis into decades: 1995 – 2000, 2001 – 2010, and 2010 – present.

The chronological approach can perfectly combine with thematic or methodological ones. In such a case, the timescale is divided not by decades but by periods characterized by a predominant methodology or preferred theme.

Thematic Approach

This method is organized around a particular issue, rather than time progression. If you have found recurring themes in the course of your reading, it is an excellent idea to focus the review on them. As a rule, the thematic approach requires an in-depth study of the available scientific literature. It also looks more substantial and time-consuming than the chronological one.

Here, the sections dwell upon different issues or various aspects of one topic. For example, an overview of psychology literature on nonverbal communication can be divided into the following parts: facial expressions, postures, eye contact, gestures, touch, etc.

Methodological Approach

Sometimes the results of findings are not as outstanding as the ways of obtaining those results. A review of research methods provides a profound scientific understanding of the subject field, notably the approaches to data collection, study, and systematization. It also provides an insight into how scientists went from isolated data to a concept, and from the concept to practical conclusions.

This form proves to be the most successful in the analysis of multidisciplinary works. You can list all the methods used and conclude on their efficiency. Alternatively, you can compare the qualitative and quantitative, empirical and theoretical, or any other incompatible methodology. The materials for analysis are the results obtained by such or another method.

Theoretical Approach

Very often, a literature review becomes the basis for a theoretical framework of a research paper. In this case, the theoretical approach is the most effective way to structure the report.

Wherever you can single out several theories on a single phenomenon, different models of a system, or diverging definitions of the same concept, the theoretical approach is the best choice. The purpose is to analyze the corpus of theory that has accumulated regarding an idea, opinion, or event. Usually, this form establishes the existing scientific knowledge gaps and finds out the outstanding research questions.

🗺️ Literature Review Outline: Mapping the Concepts

Wish to outline literature review papers correctly? First, try drawing a concept map for your outline! Create a graphic map with all the concepts and ideas you’ll want to include in the literature review outline. When you start writing, make sure that you’ve included everything you have on the map.

Well, now you’re ready to write the most fantastic outline for a literature review ever! So what are you waiting for? Go ahead and try writing your own outline using the template below – success is just around the corner!

📰 Literature Review Outline: Template

Feel free to use the literature review outline template below! Note that the template is organized thematically.

I. ISSUE #1

A. Its features

1. Positive features

a) Feature #1

b) Feature #2

2. Negative features

B. Its significance

1. Positive effects

a) Effect #1

b) Effect #2

2. Negative effects

II. ISSUE #2…

Check the literature review samples by the University of West Florida to get a clear idea on how to write this type of paper.

And now, it’s time for you to see an example of an outline for literature review writing!

👌 Literature Review Outline: Example

When creating your own review, consider the following literature review example:

Literature Review Outline: Postmodern Literature

• Introduction: postmodern literature
• Definition of the phenomenon
• The development of postmodern literature
• Research studies on postmodern themes
• Research studies on postmodern techniques
• Research studies on postmodern perspectives
• Conclusion: promising ideas for research on postmodern literature

With this literature review outline example, you’ll surely handle even the most complicated literature review structure!

✍️ Literature Review Outline: Writing Tips

When you start writing a literature review, you should keep the following issues in mind:

• Use evidence to support your interpretation of available sources.
• Be selective. Limit your literature review to sources relevant to the topic of your research. You should select only the most important points in each source.
• Compare and contrast the views of different authors. Organize the material for your reader to show trends in the literature.
• Use quotes sparingly. Apply them only when you want to emphasize the author’s point and cannot rewrite it in your own words. Always focus on giving your own summary and interpretation of the literature, showing your original thinking and analysis.
• Paraphrase in your own words to explain authors’ ideas . Give references to other sources when you are writing, but start and end the paragraphs with your own ideas.
• Summarize and synthesize your literature review sources. Identify the main points in a concise manner for your readers. Evaluate your sources , consider their strengths and weaknesses, compare and contrast the results of the studies, and discuss the strength of the evidence.
• Look for gaps in the existing research. Think about what aspects of your literature review topic have not yet been explored.
• Be creative!
• Draft and redraft. Improve the quality of your literature review by editing and proofreading.

Literature Review Essay Topics

• Literature review: aspects of nursing in the emergency department.
• Review the literature that analyzes the specifics of evidence-based nursing practice .
• Write a literature review on the role of hepcidin in the human body.  
• Analysis of challenges faced by small and medium businesses in South Africa: a literature review.
• Explore the literature that examines the interdependence between evidence and practice in healthcare .
• Review the studies examining how peritoneal dialysis influences patients’ mortality rate.
• Analyze the articles studying the connection between obesity and depression.
• Literature review the use of ecology in art .
• Discuss the academic literature examining the algorithms of speaking recognition techniques.
• Study the articles on the importance of environmental biology for preserving nature.
• Write a literature review on the role of digital signatures and cryptography.   
• Examine whether the recent studies prove the connection between peritoneal dialysis and mortality rate.
• Literature analysis on a qualitative study in healthcare.
• Explore the scientific literature researching how to adjust and regulate the effect of autism spectrum disorder .
• Analyze the articles on the causes of chronic fatigue.
• Review the academic literature discussing the effect of the token economy on the behavior of students with autism.   
• The causes and effects of pressure ulcers.   
• >Literature review on the link between COVID-19 infection and eye diseases.
• Literature review on third culture kids. 
• Study the articles reviewing the efficacy of contemporary pressure ulcer prevention methods. 
• Discuss the recent scholarly studies examining the correlation between nursing ratios and cases of hospital-acquired infections.
• Write the literature review on the benefits and side effects of corticosteroids used for asthma treatment.
• Examine the pertinent scholarly articles researching the aspects of irritable bowel syndrome diagnostics.
• Analyze the academic literature on chronic pain management.  
• Provide the synthesis of recent scholarly studies focused on ventilator-associated pneumonia.  
• Review the literature on cholecystitis symptoms and treatment.
• Importance and specifics of evidence-based nursing implementation.  
• Explore the recent studies on anemia of chronic diseases.
• Discuss the academic articles analyzing postoperative readmission rates.
• Literature review on the breakthroughs in treating Alzheimer’s disease .
• Examine the relevant literature on the benefits of Electronic Health Record systems.
• Analyze the role of pressure ulcer protocols in reducing the rates of hospital-acquired pressure ulcer cases.  
• Write a literature review on the effectiveness of the most popular ways of patient fall prevention .
• Review the relevant scholarly articles discussing the role of interprofessional collaboration in healthcare.
• Examine the recent academic literature on childhood obesity issues.  
• Review the literature on the Capstone’s PICOT question .
• Literature review of articles on cyber security of young children.  
• Discuss the latest studies examining the connection between American football and the drop in public health rates.
• Explore the relevant scholarly articles studying the challenges of single African American parents. 
• Can the implementation of special physical exercises improve the balance and stability of elderly patients? 
• Effects of traumatic brain injury: a literature review .
• Analyze the academic literature discussing the course and outcomes of operation Jawbreaker.  
• Write a literature review on the emergency room wait time and healthcare quality.  
• Review the academic articles that examine the causes of substance abuse and the efficacy of modern treatment methods.
• Examine the recent scholarly studies researching the homelessness issue.
• Discuss the academic literature analyzing the concept of biodiversity.  
• Research the archeological articles studying the ancient Roman roads.
• Analyze the literature examining the benefits and drawbacks of flipped classroom approach .
• Literature review on prevention of breast cancer .
• Review the scholarly articles studying the impact of the ZIP code on human health.

Writing a good literature review is not an easy task. It requires quite a lot of reading and researching. Check our 45 great tips on how to format and structure the literature review for more advice.

If you still have any problems in writing your literature review outline, ask for professional writing help online.

✏️ Literature Review FAQ

The way such paper should look like is best presented in the form of an outline . A simplified form would include an introduction, 3+ paragraphs (preferably with 2+ subparagraphs in each) as a review body, and a conclusion.

You should write about your interpretation of the literary piece. Include your understanding of the author’s message and the way he puts that idea across (scenes, characters, allusions, etc.). For a research paper, however, include more precise details than personal impressions.

Outlines for a paper should list concise notes about the structure of the text and its content (usually in the format of bullet points). Remember that an outline is not a research proposal or dissertation, so do not write about the goals, objectives, methods, etc.

Do you have a list of ideas you want to describe in the paper already? If so, just make those notes structured in logical consequence and format them as bullet points highlighting the gist of each part.

• Literature Review Outline
• Literature Review Outline: What You Need to Get Started
• Writing a Literature Review
• Literature Reviews
• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to LinkedIn
• Share to email

A research proposal is a document that aims to show the significance and value of a particular project. It is common to have to write research proposals to acquire funding for various research projects. But that’s not all. Perhaps the most important function of a research proposal is that it...

Are you tired of getting average grades for your term papers? Well, that’s good that you’re here! It may be true that some excellent writing and time-management skills can help you create an impressive piece, but it’s not necessary. Most of the assignments have similar outlines, whether it’s a term...

Congratulations! A dissertation is your last step before getting your doctoral degree. But, no matter how great the excitement is, the frustration and panic might be overwhelming. And it’s understandable as there is a lot of pressure on you right now. The good news is that there is nothing to...

Most of the times, there is the same research paper format for different types of research. This makes it easy to learn the correct research essay format, no matter what you are writing.

At some point, whether in school or university, you will be required to do report writing. Generally, reports are used to communicate information, which was compiled as a result of studies and analysis. For instance, academic reports are to discuss the findings of studies or surveys. The tips on report...

You are already required to write a bibliography. Why would you waste your time and effort on additional details and create an annotated one? Don’t worry. We have an excellent answer! Annotated bibliography would include such details as a brief overview of the content, usefulness, and some analysis of every...

A case study analysis is a typical assignment in business management courses. The task aims to show high school and college students how to analyze a current situation, determine what problems exist, and develop the best possible strategy to achieve the desired outcome. Many students feel anxious about writing case...

So, have you been recently assigned a research project? Or, even worse, is it already due soon? The following research paper hacks will help you do it in record time. In the article, you’ll see ten things you can do to conduct a study and compose a piece like a...

Eating a delicacy, watching a good movie, and proving a point to an audience are the three things that make life seem better. Today, you’ll deal with the last one. You’re about to become a professional at public speaking and attention grabbing. Here, you can learn how to write a...

What is a library research paper? It’s nothing more than an academic writing project that summarizes the information on a specific topic taken from primary and secondary sources. There are numerous library research examples you can find online. But to complete this assignment, you should simply follow these essential steps:...

Do you need to write a research analysis paper but have no idea how to do that? Then you’re in the right place. While completing this type of assignment, your key aim is to critically analyze a research article. An article from a serious scientific journal would be a good...

You might be wondering about how to write a conclusion paragraph for a research paper. It may seem like your readers should understand your main arguments by the end, so there is no need for it. However, there are several aspects that prove the importance of a conclusion section in...

please I was asked to write a 3000-word essay Evaluating Approaches to Literature Searching and Literature Review in Educational Research. And I don’t know how write or go about it. Can someone please help me with an outline in writing this. please someone should help

HI, how long would you suggest an undergraduate’s final year research paper should be? ( minimum in pages for both quanti and quali researches) and is 15 pages of literature review( double spacing okay?

It would probably be between 10 and 20 pages. But it all comes down to the specific topic and instructions given. Fifteen pages for a literature review sounds good, if it’s an independent type of assignment. However, if it’s part of the undergraduate’s final year research paper mentioned above, then fifteen pages is probably too much. But, again, it all depends on the instructions, topic, etc.

thankyouuuu!!!!!!! best one so far

useful blog keep going

Very well explained!

Really appreciate the great information guide on writing. It’s outstanding and brilliant how the outline process is explained herewith. Thanks.

Thank you so much. This was so helpful, especially with your examples of an outline.

I am working on a literary review on a couple of articles having to do with college football players getting paid. I have started my intro with info about the college athletic industry and how it is controversial, but how do I introduce/transition into the articles and the actually literary review?

Try to go with the facts, and stick with them. It would work kind of well, Janeth.

Thanks for stopping by. Try to write about features, positive and negative ones.

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Author Biographies
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gists) mimicking primary ovarian tumors or metastasizing to the ovaries: a systematic literature review.

Simple Summary

1. introduction, 2.1. systematic review of the literature.

• Population: human patients with GISTs mimicking a gynecological primary or metastasizing to at least 1 ovary at presentation;
• Intervention: any;
• Comparison: none;
• Outcomes: clinical outcomes (status at last follow-up, and survival and recurrence rates).
• Eligibility/inclusion criteria: studies describing cases of patients with GISTs presenting as a primary ovarian tumor or metastasizing to one or both ovaries.
• Exclusion criteria: unclear diagnosis; ovarian metastases not from GISTs; results not analyzable (data too aggregated).

2.2. Statistical Analysis

3.2. symptoms, 3.3. preoperative imaging, 3.4. tumor markers, 3.5. surgery, 3.6. other treatments, 3.7. gist characteristics, 3.8. histological findings, 3.9. immunohistochemistry, 3.10. survival and recurrence, 4. discussion, 5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, conflicts of interest.

• Angioli, R.; Battista, C.; Muzii, L.; Terracina, G.M.; Cafà, E.V.; Sereni, M.I.; Montera, R.; Plotti, F.; Rabitti, C.; Panici, P.B. A gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting as a pelvic mass: A case report. Oncol. Rep. 2009 , 21 , 899–902. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Carlomagno, G.; Beneduce, P. A gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) masquerading as an ovarian mass. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2004 , 2 , 15. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Hsu, S.; Chen, S.S.; Chen, Y.Z. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors presenting as gynecological tumors. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2006 , 125 , 139–140. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Hwang, S.Y.; Choi, C.I.; Cho, H.J.; Kim, D.H.; Hong, S.B.; Choi, K.U.; Suh, D.S. A ruptured jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with hemoperitoneum mimicking ovarian carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2020 , 13 , 49–53. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Ijeri, S.K.; Rathod, P.S.; Kundargi, R.; Pallavi, V.R.; Shobha, K.; Shankaranand; Vijay, C.R.; Uma Devi, K.; Bafna, U.D. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Mimicking as Ovarian Tumor in Gynaecologic Oncology. Indian J. Surg. Oncol. 2016 , 7 , 56–61. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kobayashi, M.; Otsuki, Y.; Kobayashi, H.; Suzuki, T.; Nakayama, S.; Adachi, H. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Repeated Multiple Cerebral Infarction Mimicking Ovarian Cancer with Trousseau’s Syndrome. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022 , 2022 , 5537990. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Matteo, D.; Dandolu, V.; Lembert, L.; Thomas, R.M.; Chatwani, A.J. Unusually large extraintestinal GIST presenting as an abdomino-pelvic tumor. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2008 , 278 , 89–92. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Modi, R.D.; Godara, P. Ileo-jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) mimicking an ovarian mass. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2023 , 33 , 314–315. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Morimura, Y.; Yamashita, N.; Koyama, N.; Ohzeki, T.; Takayama, T.; Fujimori, K.; Sato, A. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor mimicking gynecological disease. Fukushima J. Med. Sci. 2006 , 52 , 21–28. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Muñoz, M.; Ramirez, P.T.; Echeverri, C.; Alvarez, L.G.; Palomino, M.A.; Pareja, L.R. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors as an incidental finding in patients with a presumptive diagnosis of ovarian cancer. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012 , 23 , 48–52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Pinto, V.; Ingravallo, G.; Cicinelli, E.; Pintucci, A.; Sambati, G.S.; Marinaccio, M.; D’Addario, V. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors mimicking gynecological masses on ultrasound: A report of two cases. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007 , 30 , 359–361. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Wood, D.; Janssen, G.; Aljanabi, I. Extragastrointestinal stromal tumour of the transverse mesocolon mimicking giant ovarian cystic neoplasm. BMJ Case Rep. 2023 , 16 , e253816. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Zighelboim, I.; Henao, G.; Kunda, A.; Gutierrez, C.; Edwards, C. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting as a pelvic mass. Gynecol. Oncol. 2003 , 91 , 630–635. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Perrone, A.M.; Dondi, G.; Nannini, M.; De Leo, A.; Santini, D.; Saponara, M.; Tesei, M.; Pantaleo, M.; De Iaco, P. Ileal gastrointestinal stromal tumors mimicking gynecological masses: A single institutional experience. Curr. Trends Clin. Med. Imaging 2018 , 2 , 555592. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tao, K.; Zeng, X.; Liu, W.; Wang, S.; Gao, J.; Shuai, X.; Zhang, P. Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Mimicking as Gynecologic Mass: Characteristics, Management, and Prognosis. J. Surg. Res. 2020 , 246 , 584–590. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Shrestha, S.; Shrestha, B.M.; Kharel, S.; Rijal, Y.; Joshi, J.P.; Tiwari, S.B.; Sah, J.K.; Ghimire, B. Jejunal GIST masquerading as an ovarian mass: A case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2021 , 82 , 105960. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Agirlar Trabzonlu, T.; Modak, M.; Horowitz, J.M. MR Imaging of Mimics of Adnexal Pathology. Magn. Reason. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 2023 , 31 , 137–148. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Patil, S.; Jain, S.; Kaza, R.C.; Chamberlain, R.S. Giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting as a palpable abdominal mass: An unusual presentation. ISRN Surg. 2011 , 2011 , 894829. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Liu, Y.; Shahi, M.; Miller, K.; Meyer, C.F.; Hung, C.F.; Wu, T.C.; Vang, R.; Xing, D. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Mimicking Gynecologic Disease: Clinicopathological Analysis of 20 cases. Diagnostics 2022 , 12 , 1563. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Rahma, D.Y.; Atmaja, M.H.S. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor as mimicking gynecological mass finding on CT scan imaging: A case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2022 , 94 , 107092. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Baruah, A. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) mimicking a huge ovarian neoplasm in north-east India. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2017 , 27 , 1320. [ Google Scholar ]
• Karaca, N.; Akpak, Y.K.; Tatar, Z.; Batmaz, G.; Erken, A. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: May Mimic Adnexal Mass. Glob. J. Health Sci. 2015 , 8 , 20–26. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Akman, L.; Hurşitoğlu, B.S.; Farajov, R.; Terek, M.C.; Sezak, M.; Şimşek, D.; Yılmaz, H. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor and leiomyoma of the ileum mimicking adnexal mass: A report of two cases. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2015 , 26 , 56–59. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lee, T. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Presenting as a Huge Pelvic Mass. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2013 , 73 , 70–73. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Puljiz, M.; Danoli, D.; Alvir, I.; Tomica, D.; Mamic, I.; Knezevic, F.; Penavic, I. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor mimicking gynecological pathology: A case report. Libri Oncol. 2008 , 37 , 21–24. [ Google Scholar ]
• Belics, Z.; Csapó, Z.; Szabó, I.; Pápay, J.; Szabó, J.; Papp, Z. Large gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting as an ovarian tumor. A case report. J. Reprod. Med. 2003 , 48 , 655–658. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Houssaini, Z.I.; Agouri, H.E.; Amalik, S.; Khouchoua, S.; Jerguigue, H.; Latib, R.; Khannoussi, B.E.; Omor, Y. Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma mimicking ovarian cancer. Radiol. Case Rep. 2021 , 17 , 779–783. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lin, C.W.; Peng, S.L.; Wang, S.H.; Wu, P.Y. A case report of appendiceal adenocarcinoma without gastrointestinal evidence mimicking primary ovarian cancer. J. Int. Med. Res. 2022 , 50 , 3000605221088559. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kang, W.D.; Kim, C.H.; Cho, M.K.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, J.S.; Ryu, S.Y.; Kim, Y.H.; Choi, H.S.; Kim, S.M. Primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma with gastric metastasis mimic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Cancer Res. Treat. 2008 , 40 , 93–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, Y.Y.; Peng, F.S.; Lin, H.H.; Hsiao, S.M. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor mimicking ovarian malignancy in a woman with type I neurofibromatosis. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015 , 54 , 330–331. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kindblom, L.G.; Remotti, H.E.; Aldenborg, F.; Meis-Kindblom, J.M. Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT): Gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Am. J. Pathol. 1998 , 152 , 1259–1269. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Søreide, K.; Sandvik, O.M.; Søreide, J.A.; Giljaca, V.; Jureckova, A.; Bulusu, V.R. Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): A systematic review of population-based cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 , 40 , 39–46. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Van der Graaf, W.T.A.; Tielen, R.; Bonenkamp, J.J.; Lemmens, V.; Verhoeven, R.H.A.; deWilt, J.H.W. Nationwide trends in the incidence and outcome of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the imatinib era. Br. J. Surg. 2018 , 105 , 1020–1027. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Nilsson, B.; Bümming, P.; Meis-Kindblom, J.M.; Odén, A.; Dortok, A.; Gustavsson, B.; Sablinska, K.; Kindblom, L.G. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: The incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era–a population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer 2005 , 103 , 821–829. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Gopie, P.; Mei, L.; Faber, A.C.; Grossman, S.R.; Smith, S.C.; Boikos, S.A. Classification of gastrointestinal stromal tumor syndromes. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2018 , 25 , 49–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mussi, C.; Schildhaus, H.U.; Gronchi, A.; Wardelmann, E.; Hohenberger, P. Therapeutic consequences from molecular biology for gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients affected by neurofibromatosis type 1. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008 , 14 , 4550–4555. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Rossi, S.; Miceli, R.; Messerini, L.; Bearzi, I.; Mazzoleni, G.; Capella, C.; Arrigoni, G.; Sonzogni, A.; Sidoni, A.; Toffolatti, L.; et al. Natural history of imatinib-naive GISTs: A retrospective analysis of 929 cases with long-term follow-up and development of a survival nomogram based on mitotic index and size as continuous variables. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2011 , 35 , 1646–1656. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Akahoshi, K.; Oya, M.; Koga, T.; Shiratsuchi, Y. Current clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018 , 24 , 2806–2817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• DeMatteo, R.P.; Lewis, J.J.; Leung, D.; Mudan, S.S.; Woodruff, J.M.; Brennan, M.F. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann. Surg. 2000 , 231 , 51–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Fülöp, E.; Marcu, S.; Milutin, D.; Borda, A. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Review on morphology, diagnosis and management. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2009 , 50 , 319–326. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Irving, J.A.; Lerwill, M.F.; Young, R.H. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors metastatic to the ovary: A report of five cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005 , 29 , 920–926. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Nagtegaal, I.D.; Odze, R.D.; Klimstra, D.; Paradis, V.; Rugge, M.; Schirmacher, P.; Washington, K.M.; Carneiro, F.; Cree, I.A.; WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (2020). The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology 2020 , 76 , 182–188. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Joensuu, H.; Eriksson, M.; Sundby Hall, K.; Hartmann, J.T.; Pink, D.; Schütte, J.; Ramadori, G.; Hohenberger, P.; Duyster, J.; Al-Batran, S.E.; et al. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A randomized trial. JAMA 2012 , 307 , 1265–1272. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Amin, M.B.; Edge, S.; Greene, F.; Byrd, D.R.; Brookland, R.K.; Washington, M.K.; Gershenwald, J.E.; Compton, C.C.; Hess, K.R.; Sullivan, D.C.; et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 8th ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 633–640. [ Google Scholar ]
• Istók, R.; Szabó, I.; Illyés, G. Ovariumáttétet adó gastrointestinalis stromalis tumor [Gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastasized to the ovary]. Orvosi Hetil. 2005 , 146 , 223–226. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kamei, R.; Yamamoto, T.; Fujiwara, Y.; Sakamoto, K.; Kitamura, Y.; Ando, S.; Matsui, H.; Yoshino, S.; Nagano, H. A Case on the Long-Term Effect of Imatinib on GIST of Unknown Primary Origin with Multiple Liver Metastases, Peritoneal Dissemination, and Bone Metastasis. Gan Kagaku Ryoho. Cancer Chemother. 2021 , 48 , 560–562. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nakura, M.; Hirose, A.; Watanabe, T.; Tsukada, T.; Hayashi, H.; Amaya, K.; Kaji, M.; Maeda, K.; Shimizu, K. A Case of a Huge Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Extraluminal Growth Arising in the Small Intestine Diagnosed as an Ovarian Tumor. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2020 , 47 , 1927–1929. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Zbigniew, N.; Piotr, R.; Bogusław, L.; Wanda, M.; Włodzimierz, R. Nowotwory podścieliskowe przewodu pokarmowego (GIST--gastrointestinal stromal tumor) umiejscowione w jelicie cienkim i rozpoznawane przedoperacyjnie jako nowotwory narzadu rodnego [Gastrointestinal stromal tumors localized in small intestine and diagnosed preoperatively as gynecological neoplasms]. Ginekol Pol. 2005 , 76 , 855–862. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Kiśluk, J.; Gryko, M.; Guzińska-Ustymowicz, K.; Kemona, A.; Kędra, B. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors-an analysis of 80 cases from 2004 to 2010. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2013 , 22 , 33–39. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Hu, W.; Zheng, C.; Li, R.; Feng, X.; Zheng, G.; Zheng, Z.; Xiong, W.; Lin, G.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, W.; et al. Retroperitoneal Extragastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Have a Poor Survival Outcome: A Multicenter Observational Study. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020 , 12 , 10491–10504. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Huang, P.H.; Chen, Y.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Ting, W.H.; Lin, H.H.; Chen, K.H.; Hsiao, S.M. Factors affecting clinical outcomes in women with non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022 , 61 , 306–311. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• De Leo, A.; Nannini, M.; Dondi, G.; Santini, D.; Urbini, M.; Gruppioni, E.; De Iaco, P.; Perrone, A.M.; Pantaleo, M.A. Unusual bilateral ovarian metastases from ileal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): A case report. BMC Cancer 2018 , 18 , 301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Jawalkar, S.; Karajagi, R.; Arakeri, S.U. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour: Presenting as an ovarian cystadenoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2023 , 16 , e256244. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Blanco-Salazar, A.; López-Zavala, C.E.; Palau-Hernández, L.A.; Martínez Escalante, J.E. Ovarian eGIST: Case presentation and literature review | eGIST ovárico: Presentación de caso y revisión de la literatura. Gac. Mex. De Oncol. 2022 , 21 , 105–108. [ Google Scholar ]
• Peralta, J.; Echeverri, L.; Restrepo, A.; Pareja, R. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A rare case of ovarian involvement. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2022 , 32 , 1629–1630. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Turner, L.M.; Jeans, P.; Robson, S. A pedunculated small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) masquerading as an ovarian tumour. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2021 , 2021 , rjab514. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Sohail, M.; Chua, R.H.B.; Sim, S.K.; Nik Azim, N.A. Jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumour masquerading as an ovarian cancer: A case report. Med. J. Malaysia 2022 , 77 , 125–127. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Saito, H.; Kotake, M.; Ogawa, J.; Hashimoto, M.; Sawada, K.; Oshima, M.; Hada, M.; Kato, Y.; Oyama, K.; Hara, T.; et al. Laparoscopic resection of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor that recurred more than 15 years after surgery using lighted ureteral catheters: A case report. Asian J. Endosc. Surg. 2022 , 15 , 397–400. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Yamaguchi, T.; Kinoshita, J.; Saito, H.; Shimada, M.; Terai, S.; Moriyama, H.; Okamoto, K.; Nakamura, K.; Tajima, H.; Ninomiya, I.; et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastasis to the ovary: A case report. SAGE Open Med. Case Rep. 2021 , 9 , 2050313X211012511. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Oliveira Santos, P.; Cunha, T.M.; Lemos, M.M. An unusual presentation of an extragastrointestinal stromal tumour: A case report. Egypt. J. Radiol. Nucl. Med. 2020 , 51 , 162. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Deo, K.B.; Gautam, S.; Awale, L.; Yadav, T.N.; Pradhan, A.; Pandit, N. Cystic Ileal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Masquerading as Metastatic Adnexal Carcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2020 , 51 , 1053–1056. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Goyal, S.; Arora, V.K.; Joshi, M.K.; Singh, N.; Radhakrishnan, G. Intestinal GIST masquerading as an ovarian mass: Diagnosed on FNAC. J. Cytol. 2017 , 34 , 159–161. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Dayan, E.; Zhu, H.; Copperman, A.B.; Lewis, S.; Kamath, A. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting as a right adnexal mass with histopathologic correlation. Clin. Imaging 2017 , 44 , 97–100. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Gaballa, K.M.; Metwally, I.H.; Refky, B.; AbdEIKhalek, M.; Saleh, S.; Abdelaziz, A.M.; Arafa, M. Ovarian gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Does this diagnosis exist? Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2017 , 38 , 147–149. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Niazi, A.K.; Kaley, K.; Saif, M.W. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of colon: A case report and review of literature. Anticancer Res. 2004 , 34 , 2547–2550. [ Google Scholar ]
• Puljiz, M.; Alvir, I.; Danolić, D.; Tomica, D.; Mamić, I.; Puljiz, Z.; Zorica, R.; Balja, M.P. Primary extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the sigmoid mesocolon with metastatic spread to greater omentum: Case report. Coll. Antropol. 2003 , 37 , 625–627. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ando, T.; Miura, K.; Naitoh, T.; Ogawa, H.; Nobuki, Y.; Haneda, S.; Shibata, C.; Sasaki, I.; Fujishima, F.; Ishida, K. A Case of Huge Cystic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Small Intestine with CA125 Elevation and Pseudo-meigs Syndrome which was Difficult to Differentially Diagnose with an Ovarian Tumor. Jpn. J. Gastroenterol. Surg. 2011 , 44 , 1171–1178. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jindal, G.; Rastogi, R.; Kachhawa, S.; Meena, G.L. CT findings of primary extra- intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumor of greater omentum with extensive peritoneal and bilateral ovarian metastases. Indian J. Cancer 2011 , 48 , 135–137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Davies, M.; Crosbie, E.J.; Mamtora, H.; Verma, S.; Formela, L.; Slade, R.J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour presenting as an ovarian tumour. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010 , 30 , 324–325. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Swamy, M.K.; Patil, K.; Bansal, D. A rare case of gastro intestinal stromal tumour presenting as adnexal mass. J. Obstet. Gynecol. India 2010 , 60 , 527–528. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kinkor, Z.; Daum, O. Nádor ovaria jako komplikace diagnostiky extraintestinálního gastrointestinálního stromálního tumoru--dve kazuistiky [Ovarian tumor as a complication in diagnosis of the extraintestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumor--two case reports]. Ceska Gynekol. 2008 , 73 , 54–57. [ Google Scholar ]
• Morohashi, H.; Yamada, K.; Matsuura, O.; Yamazaki, S.; Fujita, M. A case of gastrointestinal stromal tumor with cystic change arising in the small intestine, diagnosed preoperatively as an ovarian tumor. Jpn. J. Gastroenterol. Surg. 2009 , 42 , 1737–1742. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McCracken, G.R.; Latta, E.K.; Rotstein, O.D.; Steinberg, W. A gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting as an ovarian tumor. J. Gynecol. Surg. 2007 , 23 , 57–62. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Erkanli, S.; Kayaselcuk, F.; Törer, N.; Bolat, F.; Tarim, E.; Simsek, E.; Kuscu, E. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors presenting as pelvic masses: Report of two cases. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2006 , 27 , 101–103. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Beltran, M.A.; Cruces, K.S.; Barría, C.; Verdugo, G. Multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the ileum and neurofibromatosis type 1. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2006 , 10 , 297–301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Gao, Y.N.; Jiang, G.Q.; Liu, J.X.; Tang, W.S.; Chen, L.Z. Preoperational misdiagnosis of extragastrointestinal stromal tumors as ovarian cancer: Report of three cases with literature review. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2005 , 40 , 339–341. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Yeat, S.-K.; Chewn, H.-J.; Pan, H.-S.; Lin, Y.-H.; Cheng, Y.-H.; Hwang, J.-L.; Huang, L.-W. Large Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Mimicking a Gynecologic Tumor. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005 , 2 , 187–191. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Powell, J.L.; Kotwall, C.A.; Wright, B.D.; Temple, R.H.; Ross, S.C.; White, W.C. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor mimicking ovarian neoplasia. J. Pelvic Surg. 2002 , 8 , 117–119. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nishida, T.; Blay, J.Y.; Hirota, S.; Kitagawa, Y.; Kang, Y.K. The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines. Gastric. Cancer 2016 , 19 , 3–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Hirota, S.; Isozaki, K. Pathology of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Pathol. Int. 2006 , 56 , 1–9. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Parab, T.M.; DeRogatis, M.J.; Boaz, A.M.; Grasso, S.A.; Issack, P.S.; Duarte, D.A.; Urayeneza, O.; Vahdat, S.; Qiao, J.H.; Hinika, G.S. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A comprehensive review. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2019 , 10 , 144–154. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Inoue, A.; Ota, S.; Yamasaki, M.; Batsaikhan, B.; Furukawa, A.; Watanabe, Y. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A comprehensive radiological review. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2022 , 40 , 1105–1120. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ghanem, N.; Altehoefer, C.; Furtwangler, A.; Winterer, J.; Schäfer, O.; Springer, O.; Kotter, E.; Langer, M. Computed tomography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Eur. Radiol. 2003 , 13 , 1669–1678. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Tateishi, U.; Hasegawa, T.; Satake, M.; Moriyama, N. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Correlation of computed tomography findings with tumor grade and mortality. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2003 , 27 , 792–798. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Yu, M.H.; Lee, J.M.; Baek, J.H.; Han, J.K.; Choi, B.I. MRI features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014 , 203 , 980–991. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kim, H.; Keene, K.S.; Sarver, D.B.; Lee, S.K.; Beasley, T.M.; Morgan, D.E.; Posey, J.A. Quantitative perfusion- and difusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of gastrointestinal cancers treated with multikinase inhibitors: A pilot study. Gastrointest. Cancer. Res. 2014 , 7 , 75–81. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Ha, C.Y.; Shah, R.; Chen, J.; Azar, R.R.; Edmundowicz, S.A.; Early, D.S. Diagnosis and management of GI stromal tumors by EUS-FNA: A survey of opinions and practices of endosonographers. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009 , 69 , 1039–1044.e1. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Cannella, R.; La Grutta, L.; Midiri, M.; Bartolotta, T.V. New advances in radiomics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J. Gastroenterol. 2020 , 26 , 4729–4738. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Alvarado-Cabrero, I.; Rodríguez-Gómez, A.; Castelan-Pedraza, J.; Valencia-Cedillo, R. Metastatic ovarian tumors: A clinicopathologic study of 150 cases. Anal. Quant. Cytopathol. Histpathol. 2013 , 35 , 24113. [ Google Scholar ]
• Testa, A.C.; Ferrandina, G.; Timmerman, D.; Savelli, L.; Ludovisi, M.; Van Holsbeke, C.; Malaggese, M.; Scambia, G.; Valentin, L. Imaging in gynecological disease: Ultrasound features of metastases in the ovaries differ depending on the origin of the primary tumor. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007 , 29 , 505–511. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Levy, A.D.; Remotti, H.E.; Thompson, W.M.; Sobin, L.H.; Miettinen, M. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Radiologic features with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2003 , 23 , 283–304. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Barat, M.; Pellat, A.; Dohan, A.; Hoeffel, C.; Coriat, R.; Soyer, P. CT and MRI of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: New Trends and Perspectives. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 2024 , 75 , 107–117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Miettinen, M.; Lasota, J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2006 , 23 , 70–83. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Rubin, B.P. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: An update. Histopathology 2006 , 48 , 83–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Khandakar, B.; Ghosh, S.; Sun, J. Epithelioid Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Retrospective Look. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2019 , 152 , S67. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Novelli, M.; Rossi, S.; Rodriguez-Justo, M.; Taniere, P.; Seddon, B.; Toffolatti, L.; Sartor, C.; Hogendoorn, P.C.; Sciot, R.; Van Glabbeke, M.; et al. DOG1 and CD117 are the antibodies of choice in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Histopathology 2010 , 57 , 259–270. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mandato, V.D.; Torricelli, F.; Mastrofilippo, V.; Palicelli, A.; Costagliola, L.; Aguzzoli, L. Primary Ovarian Leiomyosarcoma Is a Very Rare Entity: A Narrative Review of the Literature. Cancers 2023 , 15 , 2953. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mandato, V.D.; Mastrofilippo, V.; De Marco, L.; Aguzzoli, L. Laparoscopic approach to an incidentally found pelvic retroperitoneal liposarcoma: Case report and review. Medicine 2019 , 98 , e15184. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mandato, V.D.; Kobal, B.; Di Stefano, A.; Sinkovec, J.; Levicnik, A.; La Sala, G.B.; Rakar, S. Choroidal melanoma metastasized to the ovary: Case report and review of the literature. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2010 , 31 , 109–113. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Koufopoulos, N.I.; Pouliakis, A.; Samaras, M.G.; Kotanidis, C.; Boutas, I.; Kontogeorgi, A.; Dimas, D.; Sitara, K.; Zacharatou, A.; Ieronimaki, A.I.; et al. Malignant Brenner Tumor of the Ovary: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Cancers 2024 , 16 , 1106. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Santandrea, G.; Piana, S.; Valli, R.; Zanelli, M.; Gasparini, E.; De Leo, A.; Mandato, V.D.; Palicelli, A. Immunohistochemical Biomarkers as a Surrogate of Molecular Analysis in Ovarian Carcinomas: A Review of the Literature. Diagnostics 2021 , 11 , 199. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Asaturova, A.; Magnaeva, A.; Tregubova, A.; Kometova, V.; Karamurzin, Y.; Martynov, S.; Lipatenkova, Y.; Adamyan, L.; Palicelli, A. Malignant Clinical Course of “Proliferative” Ovarian Struma: Diagnostic Challenges and Treatment Pitfalls. Diagnostics 2022 , 12 , 1411. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• De Leo, A.; Santini, D.; Ceccarelli, C.; Santandrea, G.; Palicelli, A.; Acquaviva, G.; Chiarucci, F.; Rosini, F.; Ravegnini, G.; Pession, A.; et al. What Is New on Ovarian Carcinoma: Integrated Morphologic and Molecular Analysis Following the New 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors. Diagnostics 2021 , 11 , 697. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Olivadese, R.; Ramponi, A.; Boldorini, R.; Dalla Dea, G.; Palicelli, A. Mitotically Active Cellular Fibroma of the Ovary Recurring After the Longest Interval of Time (16 yr): A Challenging Case With Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2021 , 40 , 441–447. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Serrano, C.; Martín-Broto, J.; Asencio-Pascual, J.M.; López-Guerrero, J.A.; Rubió-Casadevall, J.; Bagué, S.; García-Del-Muro, X.; Fernández-Hernández, J.Á.; Herrero, L.; López-Pousa, A.; et al. 2023 GEIS Guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2023 , 15 , 17588359231192388. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mangone, L.; Marinelli, F.; Bisceglia, I.; Braghiroli, M.B.; Mastrofilippo, V.; Cerullo, L.; Pellegri, C.; Zambelli, A.; Aguzzoli, L.; Mandato, V.D. Ovarian Cancer in a Northern Italian Province and the Multidisciplinary Team. Cancers 2022 , 15 , 299. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mandato, V.D.; Torricelli, F.; Mastrofilippo, V.; Pellegri, C.; Cerullo, L.; Annunziata, G.; Ciarlini, G.; Pirillo, D.; Generali, M.; D’Ippolito, G.; et al. Impact of 2 years of COVID-19 pandemic on ovarian cancer treatment in IRCCS-AUSL of Reggio Emilia. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2023 , 163 , 679–688. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Tonni, G.; Palicelli, A.; Bassi, M.C.; Torricelli, F.; Vacca, I.; Aguzzoli, L.; Mandato, V.D. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) Mimicking Primary Ovarian Tumors or Metastasizing to the Ovaries: A Systematic Literature Review. Cancers 2024 , 16 , 2305. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132305

Tonni G, Palicelli A, Bassi MC, Torricelli F, Vacca I, Aguzzoli L, Mandato VD. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) Mimicking Primary Ovarian Tumors or Metastasizing to the Ovaries: A Systematic Literature Review. Cancers . 2024; 16(13):2305. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132305

Tonni, Gabriele, Andrea Palicelli, Maria Chiara Bassi, Federica Torricelli, Ilaria Vacca, Lorenzo Aguzzoli, and Vincenzo Dario Mandato. 2024. "Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) Mimicking Primary Ovarian Tumors or Metastasizing to the Ovaries: A Systematic Literature Review" Cancers 16, no. 13: 2305. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132305

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals