review of related literature for working students

Review of Related Literature (RRL)

Ai generator.

The Review of Related Literature (RRL) is a crucial section in research that examines existing studies and publications related to a specific topic. It summarizes and synthesizes previous findings, identifies gaps, and provides context for the current research. RRL ensures the research is grounded in established knowledge, guiding the direction and focus of new studies.

What Is Review of Related Literature (RRL)?

The Review of Related Literature (RRL) is a detailed analysis of existing research relevant to a specific topic. It evaluates, synthesizes, and summarizes previous studies to identify trends, gaps, and conflicts in the literature. RRL provides a foundation for new research, ensuring it builds on established knowledge and addresses existing gaps.

Format of Review of Related Literature (RRL)

The Review of Related Literature (RRL) is a critical part of any research paper or thesis . It provides an overview of existing research on your topic and helps to establish the context for your study. Here is a typical format for an RRL:

1. Introduction

• Purpose : Explain the purpose of the review and its importance to your research.
• Scope : Define the scope of the literature reviewed, including the time frame, types of sources, and key themes.

2. Theoretical Framework

• Concepts and Theories : Present the main theories and concepts that underpin your research.
• Relevance : Explain how these theories relate to your study.

3. Review of Empirical Studies

• Sub-theme 1 : Summarize key studies, including methodologies, findings, and conclusions.
• Sub-theme 2 : Continue summarizing studies, focusing on different aspects or variables.
• Sub-theme 3 : Include any additional relevant studies.

4. Methodological Review

• Approaches : Discuss the various methodologies used in the reviewed studies.
• Strengths and Weaknesses : Highlight the strengths and weaknesses of these methodologies.
• Gaps : Identify gaps in the existing research that your study aims to address.

5. Synthesis and Critique

• Integration : Integrate findings from the reviewed studies to show the current state of knowledge.
• Critique : Critically evaluate the literature, discussing inconsistencies, limitations, and areas for further research.

6. Conclusion

• Summary : Summarize the main findings from the literature review.
• Research Gap : Clearly state the research gap your study will address.
• Contribution : Explain how your study will contribute to the existing body of knowledge.

7. References

• Citation Style : List all the sources cited in your literature review in the appropriate citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago).

Review of Related Literature (RRL) 1. Introduction This review examines research on social media’s impact on mental health, focusing on anxiety and depression across various demographics over the past ten years. 2. Theoretical Framework Anchored in Social Comparison Theory and Uses and Gratifications Theory, this review explores how individuals’ social media interactions affect their mental health. 3. Review of Empirical Studies Adolescents’ Mental Health Instagram & Body Image : Smith & Johnson (2017) found Instagram use linked to body image issues and lower self-esteem among 500 high school students. Facebook & Anxiety : Brown & Green (2016) showed Facebook use correlated with higher anxiety and depressive symptoms in a longitudinal study of 300 students. Young Adults’ Mental Health Twitter & Stress : Davis & Lee (2018) reported higher stress levels among heavy Twitter users in a survey of 400 university students. LinkedIn & Self-Esteem : Miller & White (2019) found LinkedIn use positively influenced professional self-esteem in 200 young professionals. Adult Mental Health General Social Media Use : Thompson & Evans (2020) found moderate social media use associated with better mental health outcomes, while excessive use correlated with higher anxiety and depression in 1,000 adults. 4. Methodological Review Studies used cross-sectional surveys, longitudinal designs, and mixed methods. Cross-sectional surveys provided large data sets but couldn’t infer causation. Longitudinal studies offered insights into long-term effects but were resource-intensive. Mixed methods enriched data through qualitative insights but required careful integration. 5. Synthesis and Critique The literature shows a complex relationship between social media and mental health, with platform-specific and demographic-specific effects. However, reliance on self-reported data introduces bias, and many cross-sectional studies limit causal inference. More longitudinal and experimental research is needed. 6. Conclusion Current research offers insights into social media’s mental health impact but leaves gaps, particularly regarding long-term effects and causation. This study aims to address these gaps through comprehensive longitudinal analysis. 7. References Brown, A., & Green, K. (2016). Facebook Use and Anxiety Among High School Students . Psychology in the Schools, 53(3), 257-264. Davis, R., & Lee, S. (2018). Twitter and Psychological Stress: A Study of University Students . Journal of College Student Development, 59(2), 120-135. Miller, P., & White, H. (2019). LinkedIn and Its Effect on Professional Self-Esteem . Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 78-90. Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2017). The Impact of Instagram on Teen Body Image . Journal of Adolescent Health, 60(5), 555-560. Thompson, M., & Evans, D. (2020). The Relationship Between Social Media Use and Mental Health in Adults . Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(4), 201-208.

Review of Related Literature (RRL) Examples

Review of related literature in research, review of related literature in research paper, review of related literature qualitative research.

Review of Related Literature Quantitative Research

More Review of Related Literature (RRL) Examples

• Impact of E-learning on Student Performance
• Effectiveness of Mindfulness in Workplace
• Green Building and Energy Efficiency
• Impact of Technology on Healthcare Delivery
• Effects of Nutrition on Cognitive Development in Children
• Impact of Employee Training Programs on Productivity
• Effects of Climate Change on Biodiversity
• Impact of Parental Involvement on Student Achievement
• Effects of Mobile Learning on Student Engagement
• Effects of Urban Green Spaces on Mental Health

Purpose of the Review of Related Literature (RRL)

The Review of Related Literature (RRL) serves several critical purposes in research:

• Establishing Context : It situates your research within the broader field, showing how your study relates to existing work.
• Identifying Gaps : It highlights gaps, inconsistencies, and areas needing further exploration in current knowledge, providing a clear rationale for your study.
• Avoiding Duplication : By reviewing what has already been done, it helps ensure your research is original and not a repetition of existing studies.
• Building on Existing Knowledge : It allows you to build on the findings of previous research, using established theories and methodologies to inform your work.
• Theoretical Foundation : It provides a theoretical basis for your research, grounding it in existing concepts and theories.
• Methodological Insights : It offers insights into the methods and approaches used in similar studies, helping you choose the most appropriate methods for your research.
• Establishing Credibility : It demonstrates your familiarity with the field, showing that you are well-informed and have a solid foundation for your research.
• Supporting Arguments : It provides evidence and support for your research questions, hypotheses, and objectives, strengthening the overall argument of your study.

How to Write Review of Related Literature (RRL)

Writing a Review of Related Literature (RRL) involves several key steps. Here’s a step-by-step guide:

1. Define the Scope and Objectives

• Determine the Scope : Decide on the breadth of the literature you will review, including specific themes, time frame, and types of sources.
• Set Objectives : Clearly define the purpose of the review. What do you aim to achieve? Identify gaps, establish context, or build on existing knowledge.

2. Search for Relevant Literature

• Identify Keywords : Use keywords and phrases related to your research topic.
• Use Databases : Search academic databases like Google Scholar, PubMed, JSTOR, etc., for relevant articles, books, and papers.
• Select Sources : Choose sources that are credible, recent, and relevant to your research.

3. Evaluate and Select the Literature

• Read Abstracts and Summaries : Quickly determine the relevance of each source.
• Assess Quality : Consider the methodology, credibility of the authors, and publication source.
• Select Key Studies : Choose studies that are most relevant to your research questions and objectives.

4. Organize the Literature

• Thematic Organization : Group studies by themes or topics.
• Chronological Organization : Arrange studies in the order they were published to show the development of ideas over time.
• Methodological Organization : Categorize studies by the methods they used.

5. Write the Review

• State the purpose and scope of the review.
• Explain the importance of the topic.
• Theoretical Framework : Present and discuss the main theories and concepts.
• Summarize key studies, including their methodologies, findings, and conclusions.
• Organize by themes or other chosen organizational methods.
• Methodological Review : Discuss the various methodologies used, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.
• Synthesis and Critique : Integrate findings, critically evaluate the literature, and identify gaps or inconsistencies.
• Summarize the main findings from the literature review.
• Highlight the research gaps your study will address.
• State how your research will contribute to the existing knowledge.

6. Cite the Sources

• Use Appropriate Citation Style : Follow the required citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago).
• List References : Provide a complete list of all sources cited in your review.

What is an RRL?

An RRL summarizes and synthesizes existing research on a specific topic to identify gaps and guide future studies.

Why is RRL important?

It provides context, highlights gaps, and ensures new research builds on existing knowledge.

How do you write an RRL?

Organize by themes, summarize studies, evaluate methodologies, identify gaps, and conclude with relevance to current research.

What sources are used in RRL?

Peer-reviewed journals, books, conference papers, and credible online resources.

How long should an RRL be?

Length varies; typically 10-20% of the total research paper.

What are common RRL mistakes?

Lack of organization, insufficient synthesis, over-reliance on outdated sources, and failure to identify gaps.

Can an RRL include non-scholarly sources?

Primarily scholarly, but reputable non-scholarly sources can be included for context.

What is the difference between RRL and bibliography?

RRL synthesizes and analyzes the literature, while a bibliography lists sources.

How often should an RRL be updated?

Regularly, especially when new relevant research is published.

Can an RRL influence research direction?

Yes, it identifies gaps and trends that shape the focus and methodology of new research.

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

CHAPTER 2 Review of Related Literature and Studies Foreign Literature Student Performance Galiher

Related Papers

Ruban Vasanth

Partly Cloudy

Chika Albert

Justine Martin

Muhammad Daniyal

Eumi Cuntapay

Determinants of students ' performance have been the subject of ongoing debate among educators, academics, and policy makers. There have been many studies that sought to examine this issue and their findings point out to hard work, previous schooling, parents ’ education, family income and self motivation as factors that have a significant effect on the students GPA. Most of those studies have focused on students ' performance in the U.S. and Europe. However, since cultural differences may play a role in shaping the factors that affect students' performance, it is very important to examine those relevant factors to the UAE society. The aim of this study is to investigate the socio-economic characteristics of students of the College of Business and Economics-UAEU in relation to these students ' performance and taking into account variables pertaining to the UAE Society. Using a sample of 864 CBE student and

Nova Degorio , Katsikas Elias

JOSEPHAT NCHUNGO

RELATED PAPERS

Applied Sciences

Ahmed Hassen

Journal of Chemical Education

Elizabeth Krider

Vanessa Suarez

Humanities science current issues

Lidiia Lazurko

Liliana Resende

Danie Brand

Ethics & Behavior

Stephen Behnke

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

emy khikmawati

Mediterranean Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Gaspard Ukwizagira

Mihaela Zagajšek

Peter Windsor

Ejem A . Ejem

Noël Durand

Sustainability

Vicente Toledo Machado de MORAIS JUNIOR

Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice

Lyn English

Aquaculture Research

Prof Dr SharrAzni Harmin

Edinburgh University Press

Dr Michail Theodosiadis

Discrete Mathematics

M. Hirschhorn

János Sáringer

Plant Physiology

James Metzger

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps

sanjiva wijesinha

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Welcome to the Purdue Online Writing Lab

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

The Online Writing Lab at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue. Students, members of the community, and users worldwide will find information to assist with many writing projects. Teachers and trainers may use this material for in-class and out-of-class instruction.

The Purdue On-Campus Writing Lab and Purdue Online Writing Lab assist clients in their development as writers—no matter what their skill level—with on-campus consultations, online participation, and community engagement. The Purdue Writing Lab serves the Purdue, West Lafayette, campus and coordinates with local literacy initiatives. The Purdue OWL offers global support through online reference materials and services.

A Message From the Assistant Director of Content Development 

The Purdue OWL® is committed to supporting  students, instructors, and writers by offering a wide range of resources that are developed and revised with them in mind. To do this, the OWL team is always exploring possibilties for a better design, allowing accessibility and user experience to guide our process. As the OWL undergoes some changes, we welcome your feedback and suggestions by email at any time.

Please don't hesitate to contact us via our contact page  if you have any questions or comments.

All the best,

Social Media

Facebook twitter.

Enhancing Our Academic Core

The New School has launched a comprehensive initiative to enhance the university’s academic offerings through a review aimed at improving students’ educational experience, supporting the critical work of faculty, and amplifying the interdisciplinary learning for which we are known. This work builds on the university’s mission and vision and draws on our extensive experience in curricular innovation and on the full range of The New School’s academic, scholarly, and creative practices. This process reflects a move from ideation to clear direction and decision making. Each college has a significant role to play in contributing to The New School’s future as we review the structure of academic units, align programs, and reduce duplication of offerings for a more accessible, integrated, and compelling learning environment that supports student retention and degree completion. Our focus is to strengthen the undergraduate experience and explore opportunities for the university’s array of graduate programs. 

The Work Ahead

Charge : Develop a proposal that strengthens the university’s academic offerings by focusing on opportunities for growth and stability and identifying areas of alignment and overlap.

Vision : Focus on the existing strengths of The New School that build our reputation as a leader in innovative transdisciplinary scholarship and creative practice. Enhance academic structures that support students, the student experience, and retention as essential priorities. 

Core principles : Safeguard the academic core, including our renowned programs and institutes; respect and protect faculty and staff positions; and focus on areas of opportunity that advance the university's mission. Plans will include steps to make us a more transfer-friendly university; retaining a focus on equity, inclusion, and social justice; and the integration of graduate programs with undergraduate liberal arts degrees and of undergraduate liberal arts programs with one another. 

Who will lead this work : The Executive Deans, their academic leadership, and the Provost. 

Faculty and staff involvement : The Executive Deans will schedule meetings with academic programs in their colleges, so that every program has an opportunity to directly offer ideas about and insights into this important project. Executive Deans will create ways to collect input from their faculty and staffs and facilitate cross-college collaboration. There will also be an opportunity for these constituents to give feedback.

After May 1 : The President and the Board of Trustees will review the proposal. Following their review, the university will begin the next phase of planning and implementation and launch working groups to consider the implications for all of the colleges and areas including operational transactions and planning; staffing and resourcing needs for the new support structure; additional opportunities for strengthening our approaches to the undergraduate and graduate experience, expanding transfer initiatives, and bringing our structure into alignment across our global and New York campuses; and deepening the integration of research centers and institutes into the college structure. 

College-Led Convenings

Cross-college convenings are currently and will continue to be scheduled to include discussions about best alignments for the following programs:

Bachelor's Program for Adults and Transfer Students/School of Undergraduate Studies (Lang College of Liberal Arts, Schools of Public Engagement);

Environmental Policy and Sustainability Management (Lang College of Liberal Arts, New School for Social Research, Parsons School of Design, Schools of Public Engagement);

Languages (Lang College of Liberal Arts, Schools of Public Engagement);

Management (College of Performing Arts, New School for Social Research, Parsons School of Design, Schools of Public Engagement);

Media (College of Performing Arts, Lang College of Liberal Arts, New School for Social Research,  Parsons School of Design, Schools of Public Engagement);

Urban/Policy (Lang College of Liberal Arts, New School for Social Research, Parsons School of Design, Schools of Public Engagement);

Writing (College of Performing Arts, New School for Social Research, Parsons Paris, Schools of Public Engagement).

Below is a summary of milestones in the process. Please watch this space for updates as we make progress over the coming months.

April 8 through April 16, 2024 Executive deans convene college-led conversations with programs to solicit proposals, ideas, and concerns.

April 22 through April 25, 2024 Proposal shared with faculty and staff for comment.

May 1, 2024 Finalized proposal shared with President Shalala.

May 2024 Progress updates from the President and Provost.

June 2024 Additional topic-specific working groups to support further planning and implementation will be formed by the Provost and Executive Deans. 

Related Links

• The Provost’s Office
• Mission and Vision
• Strategic Planning
• Our Academic Approach

Community Updates

Strengthening our academic core: framework, college convenings, and data resources, strengthening the academic core: timeline and principles, strengthening the academic core: cross-college alignment conversations, strengthening our academic core: the work ahead, strengthening our academic core, submit your application, undergraduates.

To apply to any of our undergraduate programs (except the Bachelor's Program for Adults and Transfer Students and Parsons Associate of Applied Science programs) complete and submit the Common App online.

Undergraduate Adult Learners

To apply to any of our Bachelor's Program for Adults and Transfer Students and Parsons Associate of Applied Science programs, complete and submit the New School Online Application.

To apply to any of our Master's, Doctoral, Professional Studies Diploma, and Graduate Certificate programs, complete and submit the New School Online Application.