Please Wait...

Preparing everything you need. Just a moment.

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Assignments

  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Analyzing a Scholarly Journal Article
  • Group Presentations
  • Dealing with Nervousness
  • Using Visual Aids
  • Grading Someone Else's Paper
  • Types of Structured Group Activities
  • Group Project Survival Skills
  • Leading a Class Discussion
  • Multiple Book Review Essay
  • Reviewing Collected Works
  • Writing a Case Analysis Paper
  • Writing a Case Study
  • About Informed Consent
  • Writing Field Notes
  • Writing a Policy Memo
  • Writing a Reflective Paper
  • Writing a Research Proposal
  • Generative AI and Writing
  • Acknowledgments

Definition and Introduction

Case analysis is a problem-based teaching and learning method that involves critically analyzing complex scenarios within an organizational setting for the purpose of placing the student in a “real world” situation and applying reflection and critical thinking skills to contemplate appropriate solutions, decisions, or recommended courses of action. It is considered a more effective teaching technique than in-class role playing or simulation activities. The analytical process is often guided by questions provided by the instructor that ask students to contemplate relationships between the facts and critical incidents described in the case.

Cases generally include both descriptive and statistical elements and rely on students applying abductive reasoning to develop and argue for preferred or best outcomes [i.e., case scenarios rarely have a single correct or perfect answer based on the evidence provided]. Rather than emphasizing theories or concepts, case analysis assignments emphasize building a bridge of relevancy between abstract thinking and practical application and, by so doing, teaches the value of both within a specific area of professional practice.

Given this, the purpose of a case analysis paper is to present a structured and logically organized format for analyzing the case situation. It can be assigned to students individually or as a small group assignment and it may include an in-class presentation component. Case analysis is predominately taught in economics and business-related courses, but it is also a method of teaching and learning found in other applied social sciences disciplines, such as, social work, public relations, education, journalism, and public administration.

Ellet, William. The Case Study Handbook: A Student's Guide . Revised Edition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2018; Christoph Rasche and Achim Seisreiner. Guidelines for Business Case Analysis . University of Potsdam; Writing a Case Analysis . Writing Center, Baruch College; Volpe, Guglielmo. "Case Teaching in Economics: History, Practice and Evidence." Cogent Economics and Finance 3 (December 2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1120977.

How to Approach Writing a Case Analysis Paper

The organization and structure of a case analysis paper can vary depending on the organizational setting, the situation, and how your professor wants you to approach the assignment. Nevertheless, preparing to write a case analysis paper involves several important steps. As Hawes notes, a case analysis assignment “...is useful in developing the ability to get to the heart of a problem, analyze it thoroughly, and to indicate the appropriate solution as well as how it should be implemented” [p.48]. This statement encapsulates how you should approach preparing to write a case analysis paper.

Before you begin to write your paper, consider the following analytical procedures:

  • Review the case to get an overview of the situation . A case can be only a few pages in length, however, it is most often very lengthy and contains a significant amount of detailed background information and statistics, with multilayered descriptions of the scenario, the roles and behaviors of various stakeholder groups, and situational events. Therefore, a quick reading of the case will help you gain an overall sense of the situation and illuminate the types of issues and problems that you will need to address in your paper. If your professor has provided questions intended to help frame your analysis, use them to guide your initial reading of the case.
  • Read the case thoroughly . After gaining a general overview of the case, carefully read the content again with the purpose of understanding key circumstances, events, and behaviors among stakeholder groups. Look for information or data that appears contradictory, extraneous, or misleading. At this point, you should be taking notes as you read because this will help you develop a general outline of your paper. The aim is to obtain a complete understanding of the situation so that you can begin contemplating tentative answers to any questions your professor has provided or, if they have not provided, developing answers to your own questions about the case scenario and its connection to the course readings,lectures, and class discussions.
  • Determine key stakeholder groups, issues, and events and the relationships they all have to each other . As you analyze the content, pay particular attention to identifying individuals, groups, or organizations described in the case and identify evidence of any problems or issues of concern that impact the situation in a negative way. Other things to look for include identifying any assumptions being made by or about each stakeholder, potential biased explanations or actions, explicit demands or ultimatums , and the underlying concerns that motivate these behaviors among stakeholders. The goal at this stage is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the situational and behavioral dynamics of the case and the explicit and implicit consequences of each of these actions.
  • Identify the core problems . The next step in most case analysis assignments is to discern what the core [i.e., most damaging, detrimental, injurious] problems are within the organizational setting and to determine their implications. The purpose at this stage of preparing to write your analysis paper is to distinguish between the symptoms of core problems and the core problems themselves and to decide which of these must be addressed immediately and which problems do not appear critical but may escalate over time. Identify evidence from the case to support your decisions by determining what information or data is essential to addressing the core problems and what information is not relevant or is misleading.
  • Explore alternative solutions . As noted, case analysis scenarios rarely have only one correct answer. Therefore, it is important to keep in mind that the process of analyzing the case and diagnosing core problems, while based on evidence, is a subjective process open to various avenues of interpretation. This means that you must consider alternative solutions or courses of action by critically examining strengths and weaknesses, risk factors, and the differences between short and long-term solutions. For each possible solution or course of action, consider the consequences they may have related to their implementation and how these recommendations might lead to new problems. Also, consider thinking about your recommended solutions or courses of action in relation to issues of fairness, equity, and inclusion.
  • Decide on a final set of recommendations . The last stage in preparing to write a case analysis paper is to assert an opinion or viewpoint about the recommendations needed to help resolve the core problems as you see them and to make a persuasive argument for supporting this point of view. Prepare a clear rationale for your recommendations based on examining each element of your analysis. Anticipate possible obstacles that could derail their implementation. Consider any counter-arguments that could be made concerning the validity of your recommended actions. Finally, describe a set of criteria and measurable indicators that could be applied to evaluating the effectiveness of your implementation plan.

Use these steps as the framework for writing your paper. Remember that the more detailed you are in taking notes as you critically examine each element of the case, the more information you will have to draw from when you begin to write. This will save you time.

NOTE : If the process of preparing to write a case analysis paper is assigned as a student group project, consider having each member of the group analyze a specific element of the case, including drafting answers to the corresponding questions used by your professor to frame the analysis. This will help make the analytical process more efficient and ensure that the distribution of work is equitable. This can also facilitate who is responsible for drafting each part of the final case analysis paper and, if applicable, the in-class presentation.

Framework for Case Analysis . College of Management. University of Massachusetts; Hawes, Jon M. "Teaching is Not Telling: The Case Method as a Form of Interactive Learning." Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education 5 (Winter 2004): 47-54; Rasche, Christoph and Achim Seisreiner. Guidelines for Business Case Analysis . University of Potsdam; Writing a Case Study Analysis . University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center; Van Ness, Raymond K. A Guide to Case Analysis . School of Business. State University of New York, Albany; Writing a Case Analysis . Business School, University of New South Wales.

Structure and Writing Style

A case analysis paper should be detailed, concise, persuasive, clearly written, and professional in tone and in the use of language . As with other forms of college-level academic writing, declarative statements that convey information, provide a fact, or offer an explanation or any recommended courses of action should be based on evidence. If allowed by your professor, any external sources used to support your analysis, such as course readings, should be properly cited under a list of references. The organization and structure of case analysis papers can vary depending on your professor’s preferred format, but its structure generally follows the steps used for analyzing the case.

Introduction

The introduction should provide a succinct but thorough descriptive overview of the main facts, issues, and core problems of the case . The introduction should also include a brief summary of the most relevant details about the situation and organizational setting. This includes defining the theoretical framework or conceptual model on which any questions were used to frame your analysis.

Following the rules of most college-level research papers, the introduction should then inform the reader how the paper will be organized. This includes describing the major sections of the paper and the order in which they will be presented. Unless you are told to do so by your professor, you do not need to preview your final recommendations in the introduction. U nlike most college-level research papers , the introduction does not include a statement about the significance of your findings because a case analysis assignment does not involve contributing new knowledge about a research problem.

Background Analysis

Background analysis can vary depending on any guiding questions provided by your professor and the underlying concept or theory that the case is based upon. In general, however, this section of your paper should focus on:

  • Providing an overarching analysis of problems identified from the case scenario, including identifying events that stakeholders find challenging or troublesome,
  • Identifying assumptions made by each stakeholder and any apparent biases they may exhibit,
  • Describing any demands or claims made by or forced upon key stakeholders, and
  • Highlighting any issues of concern or complaints expressed by stakeholders in response to those demands or claims.

These aspects of the case are often in the form of behavioral responses expressed by individuals or groups within the organizational setting. However, note that problems in a case situation can also be reflected in data [or the lack thereof] and in the decision-making, operational, cultural, or institutional structure of the organization. Additionally, demands or claims can be either internal and external to the organization [e.g., a case analysis involving a president considering arms sales to Saudi Arabia could include managing internal demands from White House advisors as well as demands from members of Congress].

Throughout this section, present all relevant evidence from the case that supports your analysis. Do not simply claim there is a problem, an assumption, a demand, or a concern; tell the reader what part of the case informed how you identified these background elements.

Identification of Problems

In most case analysis assignments, there are problems, and then there are problems . Each problem can reflect a multitude of underlying symptoms that are detrimental to the interests of the organization. The purpose of identifying problems is to teach students how to differentiate between problems that vary in severity, impact, and relative importance. Given this, problems can be described in three general forms: those that must be addressed immediately, those that should be addressed but the impact is not severe, and those that do not require immediate attention and can be set aside for the time being.

All of the problems you identify from the case should be identified in this section of your paper, with a description based on evidence explaining the problem variances. If the assignment asks you to conduct research to further support your assessment of the problems, include this in your explanation. Remember to cite those sources in a list of references. Use specific evidence from the case and apply appropriate concepts, theories, and models discussed in class or in relevant course readings to highlight and explain the key problems [or problem] that you believe must be solved immediately and describe the underlying symptoms and why they are so critical.

Alternative Solutions

This section is where you provide specific, realistic, and evidence-based solutions to the problems you have identified and make recommendations about how to alleviate the underlying symptomatic conditions impacting the organizational setting. For each solution, you must explain why it was chosen and provide clear evidence to support your reasoning. This can include, for example, course readings and class discussions as well as research resources, such as, books, journal articles, research reports, or government documents. In some cases, your professor may encourage you to include personal, anecdotal experiences as evidence to support why you chose a particular solution or set of solutions. Using anecdotal evidence helps promote reflective thinking about the process of determining what qualifies as a core problem and relevant solution .

Throughout this part of the paper, keep in mind the entire array of problems that must be addressed and describe in detail the solutions that might be implemented to resolve these problems.

Recommended Courses of Action

In some case analysis assignments, your professor may ask you to combine the alternative solutions section with your recommended courses of action. However, it is important to know the difference between the two. A solution refers to the answer to a problem. A course of action refers to a procedure or deliberate sequence of activities adopted to proactively confront a situation, often in the context of accomplishing a goal. In this context, proposed courses of action are based on your analysis of alternative solutions. Your description and justification for pursuing each course of action should represent the overall plan for implementing your recommendations.

For each course of action, you need to explain the rationale for your recommendation in a way that confronts challenges, explains risks, and anticipates any counter-arguments from stakeholders. Do this by considering the strengths and weaknesses of each course of action framed in relation to how the action is expected to resolve the core problems presented, the possible ways the action may affect remaining problems, and how the recommended action will be perceived by each stakeholder.

In addition, you should describe the criteria needed to measure how well the implementation of these actions is working and explain which individuals or groups are responsible for ensuring your recommendations are successful. In addition, always consider the law of unintended consequences. Outline difficulties that may arise in implementing each course of action and describe how implementing the proposed courses of action [either individually or collectively] may lead to new problems [both large and small].

Throughout this section, you must consider the costs and benefits of recommending your courses of action in relation to uncertainties or missing information and the negative consequences of success.

The conclusion should be brief and introspective. Unlike a research paper, the conclusion in a case analysis paper does not include a summary of key findings and their significance, a statement about how the study contributed to existing knowledge, or indicate opportunities for future research.

Begin by synthesizing the core problems presented in the case and the relevance of your recommended solutions. This can include an explanation of what you have learned about the case in the context of your answers to the questions provided by your professor. The conclusion is also where you link what you learned from analyzing the case with the course readings or class discussions. This can further demonstrate your understanding of the relationships between the practical case situation and the theoretical and abstract content of assigned readings and other course content.

Problems to Avoid

The literature on case analysis assignments often includes examples of difficulties students have with applying methods of critical analysis and effectively reporting the results of their assessment of the situation. A common reason cited by scholars is that the application of this type of teaching and learning method is limited to applied fields of social and behavioral sciences and, as a result, writing a case analysis paper can be unfamiliar to most students entering college.

After you have drafted your paper, proofread the narrative flow and revise any of these common errors:

  • Unnecessary detail in the background section . The background section should highlight the essential elements of the case based on your analysis. Focus on summarizing the facts and highlighting the key factors that become relevant in the other sections of the paper by eliminating any unnecessary information.
  • Analysis relies too much on opinion . Your analysis is interpretive, but the narrative must be connected clearly to evidence from the case and any models and theories discussed in class or in course readings. Any positions or arguments you make should be supported by evidence.
  • Analysis does not focus on the most important elements of the case . Your paper should provide a thorough overview of the case. However, the analysis should focus on providing evidence about what you identify are the key events, stakeholders, issues, and problems. Emphasize what you identify as the most critical aspects of the case to be developed throughout your analysis. Be thorough but succinct.
  • Writing is too descriptive . A paper with too much descriptive information detracts from your analysis of the complexities of the case situation. Questions about what happened, where, when, and by whom should only be included as essential information leading to your examination of questions related to why, how, and for what purpose.
  • Inadequate definition of a core problem and associated symptoms . A common error found in case analysis papers is recommending a solution or course of action without adequately defining or demonstrating that you understand the problem. Make sure you have clearly described the problem and its impact and scope within the organizational setting. Ensure that you have adequately described the root causes w hen describing the symptoms of the problem.
  • Recommendations lack specificity . Identify any use of vague statements and indeterminate terminology, such as, “A particular experience” or “a large increase to the budget.” These statements cannot be measured and, as a result, there is no way to evaluate their successful implementation. Provide specific data and use direct language in describing recommended actions.
  • Unrealistic, exaggerated, or unattainable recommendations . Review your recommendations to ensure that they are based on the situational facts of the case. Your recommended solutions and courses of action must be based on realistic assumptions and fit within the constraints of the situation. Also note that the case scenario has already happened, therefore, any speculation or arguments about what could have occurred if the circumstances were different should be revised or eliminated.

Bee, Lian Song et al. "Business Students' Perspectives on Case Method Coaching for Problem-Based Learning: Impacts on Student Engagement and Learning Performance in Higher Education." Education & Training 64 (2022): 416-432; The Case Analysis . Fred Meijer Center for Writing and Michigan Authors. Grand Valley State University; Georgallis, Panikos and Kayleigh Bruijn. "Sustainability Teaching using Case-Based Debates." Journal of International Education in Business 15 (2022): 147-163; Hawes, Jon M. "Teaching is Not Telling: The Case Method as a Form of Interactive Learning." Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education 5 (Winter 2004): 47-54; Georgallis, Panikos, and Kayleigh Bruijn. "Sustainability Teaching Using Case-based Debates." Journal of International Education in Business 15 (2022): 147-163; .Dean,  Kathy Lund and Charles J. Fornaciari. "How to Create and Use Experiential Case-Based Exercises in a Management Classroom." Journal of Management Education 26 (October 2002): 586-603; Klebba, Joanne M. and Janet G. Hamilton. "Structured Case Analysis: Developing Critical Thinking Skills in a Marketing Case Course." Journal of Marketing Education 29 (August 2007): 132-137, 139; Klein, Norman. "The Case Discussion Method Revisited: Some Questions about Student Skills." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 30-32; Mukherjee, Arup. "Effective Use of In-Class Mini Case Analysis for Discovery Learning in an Undergraduate MIS Course." The Journal of Computer Information Systems 40 (Spring 2000): 15-23; Pessoa, Silviaet al. "Scaffolding the Case Analysis in an Organizational Behavior Course: Making Analytical Language Explicit." Journal of Management Education 46 (2022): 226-251: Ramsey, V. J. and L. D. Dodge. "Case Analysis: A Structured Approach." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 27-29; Schweitzer, Karen. "How to Write and Format a Business Case Study." ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-write-and-format-a-business-case-study-466324 (accessed December 5, 2022); Reddy, C. D. "Teaching Research Methodology: Everything's a Case." Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 18 (December 2020): 178-188; Volpe, Guglielmo. "Case Teaching in Economics: History, Practice and Evidence." Cogent Economics and Finance 3 (December 2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1120977.

Writing Tip

Ca se Study and Case Analysis Are Not the Same!

Confusion often exists between what it means to write a paper that uses a case study research design and writing a paper that analyzes a case; they are two different types of approaches to learning in the social and behavioral sciences. Professors as well as educational researchers contribute to this confusion because they often use the term "case study" when describing the subject of analysis for a case analysis paper. But you are not studying a case for the purpose of generating a comprehensive, multi-faceted understanding of a research problem. R ather, you are critically analyzing a specific scenario to argue logically for recommended solutions and courses of action that lead to optimal outcomes applicable to professional practice.

To avoid any confusion, here are twelve characteristics that delineate the differences between writing a paper using the case study research method and writing a case analysis paper:

  • Case study is a method of in-depth research and rigorous inquiry ; case analysis is a reliable method of teaching and learning . A case study is a modality of research that investigates a phenomenon for the purpose of creating new knowledge, solving a problem, or testing a hypothesis using empirical evidence derived from the case being studied. Often, the results are used to generalize about a larger population or within a wider context. The writing adheres to the traditional standards of a scholarly research study. A case analysis is a pedagogical tool used to teach students how to reflect and think critically about a practical, real-life problem in an organizational setting.
  • The researcher is responsible for identifying the case to study; a case analysis is assigned by your professor . As the researcher, you choose the case study to investigate in support of obtaining new knowledge and understanding about the research problem. The case in a case analysis assignment is almost always provided, and sometimes written, by your professor and either given to every student in class to analyze individually or to a small group of students, or students select a case to analyze from a predetermined list.
  • A case study is indeterminate and boundless; a case analysis is predetermined and confined . A case study can be almost anything [see item 9 below] as long as it relates directly to examining the research problem. This relationship is the only limit to what a researcher can choose as the subject of their case study. The content of a case analysis is determined by your professor and its parameters are well-defined and limited to elucidating insights of practical value applied to practice.
  • Case study is fact-based and describes actual events or situations; case analysis can be entirely fictional or adapted from an actual situation . The entire content of a case study must be grounded in reality to be a valid subject of investigation in an empirical research study. A case analysis only needs to set the stage for critically examining a situation in practice and, therefore, can be entirely fictional or adapted, all or in-part, from an actual situation.
  • Research using a case study method must adhere to principles of intellectual honesty and academic integrity; a case analysis scenario can include misleading or false information . A case study paper must report research objectively and factually to ensure that any findings are understood to be logically correct and trustworthy. A case analysis scenario may include misleading or false information intended to deliberately distract from the central issues of the case. The purpose is to teach students how to sort through conflicting or useless information in order to come up with the preferred solution. Any use of misleading or false information in academic research is considered unethical.
  • Case study is linked to a research problem; case analysis is linked to a practical situation or scenario . In the social sciences, the subject of an investigation is most often framed as a problem that must be researched in order to generate new knowledge leading to a solution. Case analysis narratives are grounded in real life scenarios for the purpose of examining the realities of decision-making behavior and processes within organizational settings. A case analysis assignments include a problem or set of problems to be analyzed. However, the goal is centered around the act of identifying and evaluating courses of action leading to best possible outcomes.
  • The purpose of a case study is to create new knowledge through research; the purpose of a case analysis is to teach new understanding . Case studies are a choice of methodological design intended to create new knowledge about resolving a research problem. A case analysis is a mode of teaching and learning intended to create new understanding and an awareness of uncertainty applied to practice through acts of critical thinking and reflection.
  • A case study seeks to identify the best possible solution to a research problem; case analysis can have an indeterminate set of solutions or outcomes . Your role in studying a case is to discover the most logical, evidence-based ways to address a research problem. A case analysis assignment rarely has a single correct answer because one of the goals is to force students to confront the real life dynamics of uncertainly, ambiguity, and missing or conflicting information within professional practice. Under these conditions, a perfect outcome or solution almost never exists.
  • Case study is unbounded and relies on gathering external information; case analysis is a self-contained subject of analysis . The scope of a case study chosen as a method of research is bounded. However, the researcher is free to gather whatever information and data is necessary to investigate its relevance to understanding the research problem. For a case analysis assignment, your professor will often ask you to examine solutions or recommended courses of action based solely on facts and information from the case.
  • Case study can be a person, place, object, issue, event, condition, or phenomenon; a case analysis is a carefully constructed synopsis of events, situations, and behaviors . The research problem dictates the type of case being studied and, therefore, the design can encompass almost anything tangible as long as it fulfills the objective of generating new knowledge and understanding. A case analysis is in the form of a narrative containing descriptions of facts, situations, processes, rules, and behaviors within a particular setting and under a specific set of circumstances.
  • Case study can represent an open-ended subject of inquiry; a case analysis is a narrative about something that has happened in the past . A case study is not restricted by time and can encompass an event or issue with no temporal limit or end. For example, the current war in Ukraine can be used as a case study of how medical personnel help civilians during a large military conflict, even though circumstances around this event are still evolving. A case analysis can be used to elicit critical thinking about current or future situations in practice, but the case itself is a narrative about something finite and that has taken place in the past.
  • Multiple case studies can be used in a research study; case analysis involves examining a single scenario . Case study research can use two or more cases to examine a problem, often for the purpose of conducting a comparative investigation intended to discover hidden relationships, document emerging trends, or determine variations among different examples. A case analysis assignment typically describes a stand-alone, self-contained situation and any comparisons among cases are conducted during in-class discussions and/or student presentations.

The Case Analysis . Fred Meijer Center for Writing and Michigan Authors. Grand Valley State University; Mills, Albert J. , Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010; Ramsey, V. J. and L. D. Dodge. "Case Analysis: A Structured Approach." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 27-29; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods . 6th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2017; Crowe, Sarah et al. “The Case Study Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 11 (2011):  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods . 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 1994.

  • << Previous: Reviewing Collected Works
  • Next: Writing a Case Study >>
  • Last Updated: Jun 3, 2024 9:44 AM
  • URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/assignments

Interactive Cases

Select any of the modules shown below to begin. Each case provides unique, realistic, nuanced, and in-depth situations for students to reinforce and apply their expanding skills and knowledge in an active "learning-by-doing" format.

Brickville Card Image

Families and communities consider transitions.

RAINN Card Image

Rape Incest and Abuse National Network

Hudson City Card Image

An Urban Community Affected by Disaster

The Sanchez Family Card Image

Systems, Strengths, and Stressors

Riverton Card Image

A Community Conundrum

Carla Washburn Card Image

Loss, Aging, and Social Support

Social Work Haven

social work sample case notes

Sample Case Notes for Social Work You Can Learn From

Sharing is caring.

In social work, we write case notes and record information daily; part of record keeping.

Record keeping helps in planning and decision-making.

Maintaining high-quality social work case notes and recording fosters collaborative working relationship between the social worker, other professionals, and the adults/children they support.

A sample case note for social work will help you understand what makes a high-quality case note.

So, what is a case note?

A case note involves a social worker writing what they have done, what they have seen, their professional views, analysis of the situation and action plans.

As a result, writing, clear, concise and factual case notes is an essential skill for social workers to nurture.

As part of the Social Work Role , accurate record keeping is vital.

This means that if you feel your recording skills are not up to scratch, take steps to improve upon this as part of your own personal development.

A manager once said, “ in social work practice it is vital to case note everything.  

If you don’t write it down, then it didn’t happen!

If you don’t write it down, and it happens, then you are in trouble!” 

The Ultimate Personal Development Tips to Uplevel your Life will give you detailed information on why you need to identify areas of improvement in your life to become more effective and live a more fulfilled life.

When you have a conversation with a service user, client, or have a case discussion with a manager or colleague, the best practice is to leave a case note.

Research shows that excellent record keeping and quality case notes help improve outcomes for service users/clients.

In addition, there is evidence to show that excellent record keeping / case note can help safeguard people.

Many organisational policies highlight the need for social workers keeping accurate records at all times.

However, with an increased case load coupled with time constraints, social workers often find it challenging keeping up with their case notes and record keeping.

In order not to fall behind with your case notes, I recommend you update the case records as soon as possible.

What is the importance of a case note or recording?

case note recording in social work

I highlight four of my top reasons for writing high-quality case notes.

1.0 Helps with reflection

Writing a case note is an essential part of the work we do in social work.

Most often it feels like an added task which could be skipped or handed over to the admin.

However, cultivating the habit of keeping an accurate record about a case helps us think through what we have done, and how best the individual can be supported.

Through writing case notes, you can reflect on what went well and what did not go so well regarding a particular situation.

2.0 It serves as evidence when needed in court.

Social workers often attend court to present cases or to support a service user or client.

Sometimes, they have to attend a court hearing even when given brief notice.

Having up-to-date case notes means you have readily available information and clear evidence to present to the court.

The case notes may also come in handy when there is a complaint or investigations required.

3.0 You have a record of the chronology of events

A chronology will provide a summary of significant events in a person’s life.

This means that you will have a record of significant concerns, risks or incidents that impact positively or negatively on a person’s wellbeing.

Such information is relevant in court proceedings and in child protection cases.

4.0 It supports good assessments

Good assessments should be holistic.

Holistic assessments encompass the physical; emotional; spiritual; mental; social; environmental.

It includes all aspects of wellbeing.

The importance of relationships, work and support network.

In addition, it involves gathering information from relevant sources with the client’s consent.

Information may be gathered from friends, family, or carers.

From this, you can identify important themes and challenges.

The process ends when the assessment outcomes are used to inform an individualised care and support plan.

With a clear and factual record keeping or case note, it ensures an effective and good assessment is carried out.

Good assessments also capture the wishes and feelings of the individual.

However, before you can record the wishes, feelings and views of service users or clients, you first need to spend enough time with them in order to know what they are.

This can only be achieved through forming rapport and having a meaningful professional relationship with the children or adults.

5.0 It is part of your professional duty as a social worker.

As a social worker, your duty includes keeping an accurate record.

It helps with accountability too.

Avoid the use of jargons and make your write up as personalised as possible.

That is why I choose to follow the following process recommended by Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) when completing case notes in social work–PARTNERSHIP

How do you write a good case note?

writing case notes in social work

1.0 Person-centred

It’s all about the person.

Ensure the case notes reflect the voice of the individual, what they hope to achieve from the assessment, review or in their lives.

Note the individual’s appearance, if relevant.

2.0 Accurate

Review the information you have recorded to ensure that it is up to date and accurate.

Be honest, factual, and avoid being vague.

Read over what you have written and think about how it will make the service user or client feel should they read it themselves.

Will it cause them to feel distressed, upset or will they agree with what you have written?

4.0 Take detailed notes

Ensure notes taken during a conversation or assessment are detailed.

Record information timely.

Remember to schedule time to write your case notes.

5.0 No jargon

Use simple English language and avoid the use of jargons.

For example, you may write in a case note “ the next MDT meeting is on the 7th of January ”.

This may make sense to you, but will appear incomprehensible to others who do not understand the meaning of MDT (multi-disciplinary team).

6.0 Evidence–based

record keeping in social work

Your opinion and professional views/judgement matter as a social worker.

However, make sure they are backed with facts and evidence.

Give reasons where possible.

Distinguish between facts and opinions, so opinion is not mistaken for fact.

Be self-aware, but take the time to judge the levels of risk and need effectively.

Remember to read historical case notes and assessments.

8.0 Succinct

Be concise, brief, and avoid waffling.

Write what is necessary and leave out unnecessary details.

Make your writing objective.

9.0 Holistic

Gather information from other relevant sources and record what other professionals are doing to support the service user or client.

This will also give the next person who reads the case recording a clear indication of what is going on with the case.

10.0 Identify any errors

Read over notes and identify any grammatical or spelling mistakes.

Ensure that you are following your organisational IT procedure too and record information on the system.

11.0 Professional

Part of your credibility as a social worker is to maintain accurate and clear records.

A social worker who is unable to provide a record of what they have done with a case or what their action plans are may be questioned about their professional ability.

Be mindful of your own views and unconscious biases.

Share information only on a need-to-know basis and with individual’s consent unless there are safeguarding concerns or there is a lack of capacity.

Write your action plan.

How do you write a case note in social work?

Case note examples in social work vary from one organisation to another depending on organisational policies and guidelines.

However, a case note should cover basic elements as highlighted in the PATERNERSHIP model above.

Using this model will help you write better case notes.

Case note template

Case note template

04/04/2021 at 10:30am. (this is the time the call/visit took place) Home visit to Beth to discuss children’s poor school attendance.

Beth expressed having no transport for children to attend school since her car broke down.

Beth said she was feeling low and would like to engage in some social activities.

X and Y were observed playing, and they told me they were looking forward to going back to school.

Discussed arranging for a school transport to drop children at school. With Beth’s consent, I spoke to the transport team and made a booking for children to attend school.

Agreed to visit Beth again on 07/04/2021 at 2:30pm to start looking at social activities that she could engage with (name, role).

04/04/2021 at 11:30am. (this is the time the call/visit took place). Home visit to Sally for a welfare check.

Sally said she had a seizure last night. I observed very little food in the house. I supported Sally to speak to the GP surgery. GP has booked Sally in for some blood tests and scans.

With Sally’s consent, I contacted the food bank and arranged for a food parcel to be delivered.

My views are that once I review Sally’s care and support needs, she will have the appropriate support in place to help with her day to day living.

Agreed to visit Sally again on 08/04/2021 at 3pm to review her care and support needs.

Social work case notes cheat sheet

  • Date and time
  • Reason for contact or conversation
  • Capacity to make decisions around subject being discussed if applicable
  • Views of the person
  • Views of others
  • What did you see?
  • What did you do?
  • Any risks identified
  • Did you consult or share information with anyone? If so, why?
  • Your professional opinion and analysis
  • Action plan

 Socialworkhaven.com Useful Resources

  • Social Work To-Do List

Social Work To – Do List: What To Include: We sometimes struggle with managing our daily tasks as social workers. This is not because we do not have the skills. The work load, crisis and challenges we face can be overwhelming. That is why a social work to-do list may help us manage better.

  • Recommended Books

Best Social Work Books Every Student Must Read  is a great article full of highly recommended and engaging books. Helping student social workers to equip themselves with knowledge and skills. It is a great way to empower yourself and encourage you to read more.

  • Social Work Registration

Social Work Registration: Get it done – is a useful article that walks you through the social work registration process.

  • Social Work Burnout

51 Effective Ways to Fight Social Work Burnout helps practitioners explore 51 effective ways to fight Social Work Burnout. Social work burnout can affect the way we execute our role. It can cause social work stress, and a stressed social worker cannot perform their role effectively.

  • Active Listening in Social Work

Why You Should Actively Listen as a Social Worker raises awareness of active listening in social work. Social work active listening involves the listener paying close attention to the speaker, making sure not to interrupt, and reflecting on what they have heard. This helps the speaker feel heard and validated, and it can also help them clarify their thoughts and feelings.

  • Social Work Humour

Social Work Humour for the End of a Long Day This article explains when social work humour is important. Essential social work skills include empathy, authenticity, resilience and respect. These skills help us cope with situations and meet the needs of service users or clients. However, the best coping mechanism in social work is definitely humour.

PIN IT FOR LATER!

social work sample case note

Ultimate Personal Development Tips to Uplevel your Life .

Social Work Skills You Need to Know.

How to Meet the PCF Domain of Professionalism in Social Work

References:

Community Care.

https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2017/06/07/tips-social-workers-case-recording-record-keeping/

Social Care Institute for Excellence

https://www.scie.org.uk/social-work/recording

One to Stop

https://onestopsocial.co.uk/2017/09/06/social-care-tips-effective-case-note-contacts/

Social Work Got You Losing Your Mind?

Download your free mental capacity assessment sample now, leave a comment cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

  • You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
  • You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
  • You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
  • A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

OEC logo

Site Search

  • How to Search
  • Advisory Group
  • Editorial Board
  • OEC Fellows
  • History and Funding
  • Using OEC Materials
  • Collections
  • Research Ethics Resources
  • Ethics Projects
  • Communities of Practice
  • Get Involved
  • Submit Content
  • Open Access Membership
  • Become a Partner

Undergraduate Case Analysis Rubric

This rubric can be used for guiding undergraduate case analysis for the course " Genomics, Ethics, and Society ."

  Levels of Achievement
Criteria Completely Inadequate Slightly Inadequate Competent Excellent Total Points
Problem identification Fails to identify the main ethical issues; Does not show understanding of why different approaches may be taken to this problem and why stakeholders may disagree. Some difficulties in identifying the main ethical issues; some difficulties understanding why different approaches may be taken to this problem and why stakeholders may disagree. Some success identifying the main ethical issues; Shows some understanding of why different approaches may be taken to this problem and why stakeholders may disagree Accurately identifies main ethical issues; Shows good understanding of why different approaches may be taken to this problem, and why stakeholders may disagree.

 

Providing empirical information and use of sources Fails to provide any, or accurate empirical information; makes empirical claims with no evidence to back them up; uses no or inappropriate sources. Some difficulties in identifying sufficient or relevant information; insufficient support for empirical claims from reliable sources; us of few or somewhat inappropriate sources. Some success in making sufficient and relevant empirical claims and in providing sufficient support for them from a reasonable number of reliable sources. Accurately identifies sufficient and relevant empirical information, and draws on support from sufficient and reliable sources.
Engages with appropriate range of value concerns Fails to discuss a range of appropriate values that might be at stake (eg justice, suffering, privacy, liberty, naturalness). Discusses a very limited range of appropriate values that may be at stake(eg justice, suffering,liberty, privacy, naturalness). Some success in discussing a range of appropriate value sthat might be at stake (eg justice, suffering, liberty, privacy, naturalness). Successfully discusses a range of appropriate values that might be at stake (eg justice, suffering, liberty, privacy, naturalness).
Open-minded and fair discussion Assumes basic position without arguing for it; shows obvious bias; is unfair in argument; sets up straw man arguments. Basic position is only partially defended; some biases evident; occasional unfairness in argument; a tendency to caricature others' arguments. Sufficient reasons to support basic position; no biases evident; no unfairness in argument; no caricature of others' arguments Basic position effectively justified; fair presentation of others' positions; charitable interpretation of others' arguments.
Thinking critically about own and others' views Complete lack of critical thinking about sources and arguments used; doesn't offer objection to own argument. Insufficient degree of critical thinking about sources and arguments used; considers limited objections to own argument. Some degree of critical thinking about sources and arguments used; some objections to own argument. Engages critically with sources and arguments used, and offers plausible objections to his or her own argument.
Makes an appropriate argument Fails to make an argument at all; fails to make an ethical argument; argument fails to answer the prompt; no creativity is expressed. Argument is weak and difficult to follow; argument doesn't clearly draw on ethical ideas; some disassociation between prompt and response; little creativity is expressed. A comprehensible argument is present; the argument makes an ethical case and addresses the prompt; some creativity is expressed where relevant. A clear and rigorously developed argument is present; the argument directly addresses ethical questions and clearly responds to the prompt; the argument displays creativity where relevant.
Writing Quality Poor spelling and grammar throughout. Writing is barely coherent. No indication of what the argument will be or how the case study analysis will be structured at the beginning of the analysis. Some spelling and grammar errors. Does not express opinions or ideas clearly.Only vague guidance as to how the case study analysis will be structured at the beginning of the analysis. Few grammatical or spelling errors. Ideas are expressed reasonably clearly. Some guidance as to what the argument will be and how the case analysis will be structured at the beginning of the analysis. Consistently uses correct grammar with rare misspellings. Expresses ideas in a clear and concise manner. Clear guidance given as to what the argument will be and how the case study analysis will be structured at the beginning of the analysis.
         

Related Resources

Submit Content to the OEC   Donate

NSF logo

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. 2055332. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Eberly Center

Teaching excellence & educational innovation, grading and performance rubrics, what are rubrics.

A rubric is a scoring tool that explicitly represents the performance expectations for an assignment or piece of work. A rubric divides the assigned work into component parts and provides clear descriptions of the characteristics of the work associated with each component, at varying levels of mastery. Rubrics can be used for a wide array of assignments: papers, projects, oral presentations, artistic performances, group projects, etc. Rubrics can be used as scoring or grading guides, to provide formative feedback to support and guide ongoing learning efforts, or both.

Advantages of Using Rubrics

Using a rubric provides several advantages to both instructors and students. Grading according to an explicit and descriptive set of criteria that is designed to reflect the weighted importance of the objectives of the assignment helps ensure that the instructor’s grading standards don’t change over time. Grading consistency is difficult to maintain over time because of fatigue, shifting standards based on prior experience, or intrusion of other criteria. Furthermore, rubrics can reduce the time spent grading by reducing uncertainty and by allowing instructors to refer to the rubric description associated with a score rather than having to write long comments. Finally, grading rubrics are invaluable in large courses that have multiple graders (other instructors, teaching assistants, etc.) because they can help ensure consistency across graders and reduce the systematic bias that can be introduced between graders.

Used more formatively, rubrics can help instructors get a clearer picture of the strengths and weaknesses of their class. By recording the component scores and tallying up the number of students scoring below an acceptable level on each component, instructors can identify those skills or concepts that need more instructional time and student effort.

Grading rubrics are also valuable to students. A rubric can help instructors communicate to students the specific requirements and acceptable performance standards of an assignment. When rubrics are given to students with the assignment description, they can help students monitor and assess their progress as they work toward clearly indicated goals. When assignments are scored and returned with the rubric, students can more easily recognize the strengths and weaknesses of their work and direct their efforts accordingly.

Examples of Rubrics

Here are links to a diverse set of rubrics designed by Carnegie Mellon faculty and faculty at other institutions. Although your particular field of study and type of assessment activity may not be represented currently, viewing a rubric that is designed for a similar activity may provide you with ideas on how to divide your task into components and how to describe the varying levels of mastery.

Paper Assignments

  • Example 1: Philosophy Paper This rubric was designed for student papers in a range of philosophy courses, CMU.
  • Example 2: Psychology Assignment Short, concept application homework assignment in cognitive psychology, CMU.
  • Example 3: Anthropology Writing Assignments This rubric was designed for a series of short writing assignments in anthropology, CMU.
  • Example 4: History Research Paper . This rubric was designed for essays and research papers in history, CMU.
  • Example 1: Capstone Project in Design This rubric describes the components and standard of performance from the research phase to the final presentation for a senior capstone project in the School of Design, CMU.
  • Example 2: Engineering Design Project This rubric describes performance standards on three aspects of a team project: Research and Design, Communication, and Team Work.

Oral Presentations

  • Example 1: Oral Exam This rubric describes a set of components and standards for assessing performance on an oral exam in an upper-division history course, CMU.
  • Example 2: Oral Communication
  • Example 3: Group Presentations This rubric describes a set of components and standards for assessing group presentations in a history course, CMU.

Class Participation/Contributions

  • Example 1: Discussion Class This rubric assesses the quality of student contributions to class discussions. This is appropriate for an undergraduate-level course, CMU.
  • Example 2: Advanced Seminar This rubric is designed for assessing discussion performance in an advanced undergraduate or graduate seminar. 

creative commons image

IMAGES

  1. social work case study rubric

    social work case study rubric

  2. Rubric Case Study

    social work case study rubric

  3. Case Study Evaluation Rubric.pdf

    social work case study rubric

  4. Social Work Community Case Study Report Sample

    social work case study rubric

  5. social work case study rubric

    social work case study rubric

  6. Social Studies Project Rubric by Locky733's Writing About Reading Store

    social work case study rubric

VIDEO

  1. COMMUNITY & MACRO PRACTICE MASTERCLASS INTRODUCTION (Skip to 1:40)

  2. ASWB UNIT 1 PRACTICE QUESTIONS_10.24.23 (ASWB, BSW, LSW, MSW, LMSW, LCSW)

  3. Case Study Rubric Paper

  4. Start Doing This Today To Get Macro Social Work Jobs!

  5. 3 Signs That You Should Be A Macro Social Worker

  6. Case Study: How operational changes can affect workplace health

COMMENTS

  1. PDF Case Study Grading Rubric Presenter Name: Judges Initials: 4 3 2 1 0 Score

    discusses an in-depth and critical assessment of the facts of the case in relation to available research. weighs and assesses a variety of alternative actions that address multiple issues in the case, all of which are realistic options. The presenter(s): discusses a mostly thorough assessment. of the facts of the case in relation to available ...

  2. PDF SOC 160: Introduction to Social Work Case Study Grading Rubric

    case study, but not all. Main issues/problems are not clearly identified or are identified incorrectly. Application of Ethical Principles Weight: 25% Clearly and creatively applies 3 or more Social Work ethical principles to the situation presented in the case study. Clearly and accurately applies 2 social work ethical principles to the

  3. Using Rubrics to provide Strength-based Feedback for Social Work

    (Relevant portion of) Assignment instructions: Briefly describe each of the stages of grief from the text. Identify at least 3 examples of cultural, religious, or spiritual practices from the case study provided. How might this affect the clients' bereavement process? (Relevant portion of) Assignment Rubric: Sample from one of Kristen's rubrics

  4. PDF Embedded assignments and grading rubric example

    The exercise will focus on social work assessment techniques using ego-supportive and strengths perspective interventions. This exercise will involve paired students role-playing a case study while being videotaped and observed by the class. One student will be the client while the other student will be the social worker. You will switch roles for

  5. PDF Case Analysis Grading Rubric

    work 0-7 pts Conclusions 20 pts • logically extrapolate inquiry findings • demonstrate relevant and wide-ranging research that supports analytical reasoning in response to case study questions Throughout the whole work, conclusions 17-20 pts Throughout most of the work, conclusions 13-16 pts Throughout a much of the work, conclusions 9-12 pts

  6. Social Work Practice (SW4001) Syllabus

    6. Develop an understanding of the purpose and need for supervision and consultation as a part of responsible social work practice. Covered by readings and lectures week 5 and 12. Assessed by Midterm and Case management paper. 7. Develop a beginning understanding of the professional use-of-self in social work practice.

  7. Writing a Case Analysis Paper

    A case study is indeterminate and boundless; a case analysis is predetermined and confined. A case study can be almost anything [see item 9 below] as long as it relates directly to examining the research problem. This relationship is the only limit to what a researcher can choose as the subject of their case study.

  8. Creating and Using Rubrics

    Example 1: Philosophy Paper This rubric was designed for student papers in a range of courses in philosophy (Carnegie Mellon). Example 2: Psychology Assignment Short, concept application homework assignment in cognitive psychology (Carnegie Mellon). Example 3: Anthropology Writing Assignments This rubric was designed for a series of short ...

  9. Critical Evaluation of Social Work Response: Case Study Analysis

    :Case Study 1500 1.0 Assessment Description Students will demonstrate a critical evaluation of a practice scenario (case study) outlining the different stages of social work responses to the scenario. NOTE: Students are not to give an opinion or make decisions regarding what should be implemented. This assessment task is intended to develop your assessment skills to understand the situation ...

  10. Case Study Rubric .docx

    SOW 3620 - Culturally Competent Social Work Practice Guidelines and Grading Matrix Case Study (25 Points) Case Study: Esteban and Carmen: (25 points) The case study assignment requires the student to critically analyze the theoretical perspectives and practice applications associated with the assigned case study after reviewing the assigned chapter of the Sue Rasheed and Rasheed (2016) textbook.

  11. Interactive Cases

    New Directions in Social Work is an innovative, integrated series offering a uniquely distinctive teaching strategy for generalist courses in the social work curriculum, at both undergraduate and graduate levels. The series integrates 5 texts with custom websites housing interactive cases, companion readings, and a wealth of resources to enrich the teaching and learning experience.

  12. PDF Case Studies

    Grand Challenges Faculty Development Institute: Eradicate Social Isolation CSWE, Dallas, TX, Oct. 19, 2017 1 Case Studies The following case studies were included to highlight different ways that social workers can assess and intervene with issues of social isolation. These cases are free to you to use, modify, and incorporate into your teaching.

  13. Theoretical Analysis of Social Work Case: Applying Theory to

    You are invited to write an 8-12 page paper that will analyze a case study by applying two social work theories, perspectives, approaches, or lenses to explain human behavior in the social environment of the case. In particular, you will focus on using two theories to explore a social justice topic/issue within that case study (racism, sexism ...

  14. PDF Rubric Design for Assignment and Course Assessment

    Several studies and their results are described. Studies are from different sources, including journal articles Several studies and their results are described. Studies are from different sources but do not include journal articles More than one study is described from a journal article and other source One study from a journal article is described

  15. PDF Rubrics for Evaluating the Competency of Students in Field Practicum Iv

    Social Worker to team members. • The student was in contact with the other professionals involved in her cases to ensure her clients had a good understanding of the progression of their cases. She was able to effectively articulate her role as a Social Worker to them. education which will continue to

  16. A Rubric for Evaluating Student Analyses of Business Cases

    First, it informs students of the criteria on which their work will be evaluated. Second, it provides instructors with a reliable instrument for accurately measuring and grading student performance on written case assignments. Third, if the rubric is used multiple times during the semester, student progress can also be measured.

  17. PDF CHILD STUDY TEAM CASE MANAGER RUBRIC School Social Worker, School

    CHILD STUDY TEAM CASE MANAGER RUBRIC School Social Worker, School Psychologist, Learning Disabilities Teacher Consultant 1 Domain: 1 Planning and Preparation Component a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Local, State, and Federal regulations, and of Academic, Emotional, and Behavioral supports within and beyond the school and District.

  18. Sample Case Notes for Social Work You Can Learn From

    Example 1. 04/04/2021 at 10:30am. (this is the time the call/visit took place) Home visit to Beth to discuss children's poor school attendance. Beth expressed having no transport for children to attend school since her car broke down. Beth said she was feeling low and would like to engage in some social activities.

  19. PDF Case Study Evaluation Rubric

    The National School Psychology Certification Board (NSPCB) of the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) developed the following rubric to help guide applicants in structuring an effective case study. Additionally, the NSPCB utilizes the rubric as part of the evaluation process for NCSP candidates from graduate programs without ...

  20. Developing Realistic Case Scenarios for Social Work Support

    ASSESSMENT 1: Development of a Case Study 1.0 Assessment Description Students will develop a detailed case scenario / case study which they will continue to work with throughout this Unit. Examples of case scenarios will be shared in Week 1 & in small groups, students will identify the complex existing presenting issues.

  21. Undergraduate Case Analysis Rubric

    3 Points. Basic position effectively justified; fair presentation of others' positions; charitable interpretation of others' arguments. 3. Thinking critically about own and others' views. 1.5 Points. Complete lack of critical thinking about sources and arguments used; doesn't offer objection to own argument. 2 Points.

  22. Rubrics

    Paper Assignments. Example 1: Philosophy Paper This rubric was designed for student papers in a range of philosophy courses, CMU. Example 2: Psychology Assignment Short, concept application homework assignment in cognitive psychology, CMU. Example 3: Anthropology Writing Assignments This rubric was designed for a series of short writing ...

  23. Rubrics For The Case Study

    This document provides a rubric for evaluating student case study presentations in a Good Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility course. The rubric assesses student performance across six components: identification of issues, stakeholder perspective, analysis and evaluation, courses of action, recommendation, and ability to work as a team. For each component, criteria for "very good ...

  24. Social Studies Case Study Description and Rubric

    The case study requires teacher candidates to identify a student struggling with a social studies concept, analyze data about the student's performance, propose and implement a solution to address the issue, and report the results. It will be evaluated based on clearly identifying and addressing the problem, thoroughly analyzing student work, describing the classroom context, proposing ...