is a case study a research method

The Ultimate Guide to Qualitative Research - Part 1: The Basics

• Introduction and overview
• What is qualitative research?
• What is qualitative data?
• Examples of qualitative data
• Qualitative vs. quantitative research
• Mixed methods
• Qualitative research preparation
• Theoretical perspective
• Theoretical framework
• Literature reviews

Research question

• Conceptual framework
• Conceptual vs. theoretical framework

Data collection

• Qualitative research methods
• Focus groups
• Observational research

What is a case study?

Applications for case study research, what is a good case study, process of case study design, benefits and limitations of case studies.

• Ethnographical research
• Ethical considerations
• Confidentiality and privacy
• Power dynamics
• Reflexivity

Case studies

Case studies are essential to qualitative research , offering a lens through which researchers can investigate complex phenomena within their real-life contexts. This chapter explores the concept, purpose, applications, examples, and types of case studies and provides guidance on how to conduct case study research effectively.

Whereas quantitative methods look at phenomena at scale, case study research looks at a concept or phenomenon in considerable detail. While analyzing a single case can help understand one perspective regarding the object of research inquiry, analyzing multiple cases can help obtain a more holistic sense of the topic or issue. Let's provide a basic definition of a case study, then explore its characteristics and role in the qualitative research process.

Definition of a case study

A case study in qualitative research is a strategy of inquiry that involves an in-depth investigation of a phenomenon within its real-world context. It provides researchers with the opportunity to acquire an in-depth understanding of intricate details that might not be as apparent or accessible through other methods of research. The specific case or cases being studied can be a single person, group, or organization – demarcating what constitutes a relevant case worth studying depends on the researcher and their research question .

Among qualitative research methods , a case study relies on multiple sources of evidence, such as documents, artifacts, interviews , or observations , to present a complete and nuanced understanding of the phenomenon under investigation. The objective is to illuminate the readers' understanding of the phenomenon beyond its abstract statistical or theoretical explanations.

Characteristics of case studies

Case studies typically possess a number of distinct characteristics that set them apart from other research methods. These characteristics include a focus on holistic description and explanation, flexibility in the design and data collection methods, reliance on multiple sources of evidence, and emphasis on the context in which the phenomenon occurs.

Furthermore, case studies can often involve a longitudinal examination of the case, meaning they study the case over a period of time. These characteristics allow case studies to yield comprehensive, in-depth, and richly contextualized insights about the phenomenon of interest.

The role of case studies in research

Case studies hold a unique position in the broader landscape of research methods aimed at theory development. They are instrumental when the primary research interest is to gain an intensive, detailed understanding of a phenomenon in its real-life context.

In addition, case studies can serve different purposes within research - they can be used for exploratory, descriptive, or explanatory purposes, depending on the research question and objectives. This flexibility and depth make case studies a valuable tool in the toolkit of qualitative researchers.

Remember, a well-conducted case study can offer a rich, insightful contribution to both academic and practical knowledge through theory development or theory verification, thus enhancing our understanding of complex phenomena in their real-world contexts.

What is the purpose of a case study?

Case study research aims for a more comprehensive understanding of phenomena, requiring various research methods to gather information for qualitative analysis . Ultimately, a case study can allow the researcher to gain insight into a particular object of inquiry and develop a theoretical framework relevant to the research inquiry.

Why use case studies in qualitative research?

Using case studies as a research strategy depends mainly on the nature of the research question and the researcher's access to the data.

Conducting case study research provides a level of detail and contextual richness that other research methods might not offer. They are beneficial when there's a need to understand complex social phenomena within their natural contexts.

The explanatory, exploratory, and descriptive roles of case studies

Case studies can take on various roles depending on the research objectives. They can be exploratory when the research aims to discover new phenomena or define new research questions; they are descriptive when the objective is to depict a phenomenon within its context in a detailed manner; and they can be explanatory if the goal is to understand specific relationships within the studied context. Thus, the versatility of case studies allows researchers to approach their topic from different angles, offering multiple ways to uncover and interpret the data .

The impact of case studies on knowledge development

Case studies play a significant role in knowledge development across various disciplines. Analysis of cases provides an avenue for researchers to explore phenomena within their context based on the collected data.

This can result in the production of rich, practical insights that can be instrumental in both theory-building and practice. Case studies allow researchers to delve into the intricacies and complexities of real-life situations, uncovering insights that might otherwise remain hidden.

Types of case studies

In qualitative research , a case study is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Depending on the nature of the research question and the specific objectives of the study, researchers might choose to use different types of case studies. These types differ in their focus, methodology, and the level of detail they provide about the phenomenon under investigation.

Understanding these types is crucial for selecting the most appropriate approach for your research project and effectively achieving your research goals. Let's briefly look at the main types of case studies.

Exploratory case studies

Exploratory case studies are typically conducted to develop a theory or framework around an understudied phenomenon. They can also serve as a precursor to a larger-scale research project. Exploratory case studies are useful when a researcher wants to identify the key issues or questions which can spur more extensive study or be used to develop propositions for further research. These case studies are characterized by flexibility, allowing researchers to explore various aspects of a phenomenon as they emerge, which can also form the foundation for subsequent studies.

Descriptive case studies

Descriptive case studies aim to provide a complete and accurate representation of a phenomenon or event within its context. These case studies are often based on an established theoretical framework, which guides how data is collected and analyzed. The researcher is concerned with describing the phenomenon in detail, as it occurs naturally, without trying to influence or manipulate it.

Explanatory case studies

Explanatory case studies are focused on explanation - they seek to clarify how or why certain phenomena occur. Often used in complex, real-life situations, they can be particularly valuable in clarifying causal relationships among concepts and understanding the interplay between different factors within a specific context.

Intrinsic, instrumental, and collective case studies

These three categories of case studies focus on the nature and purpose of the study. An intrinsic case study is conducted when a researcher has an inherent interest in the case itself. Instrumental case studies are employed when the case is used to provide insight into a particular issue or phenomenon. A collective case study, on the other hand, involves studying multiple cases simultaneously to investigate some general phenomena.

Each type of case study serves a different purpose and has its own strengths and challenges. The selection of the type should be guided by the research question and objectives, as well as the context and constraints of the research.

The flexibility, depth, and contextual richness offered by case studies make this approach an excellent research method for various fields of study. They enable researchers to investigate real-world phenomena within their specific contexts, capturing nuances that other research methods might miss. Across numerous fields, case studies provide valuable insights into complex issues.

Critical information systems research

Case studies provide a detailed understanding of the role and impact of information systems in different contexts. They offer a platform to explore how information systems are designed, implemented, and used and how they interact with various social, economic, and political factors. Case studies in this field often focus on examining the intricate relationship between technology, organizational processes, and user behavior, helping to uncover insights that can inform better system design and implementation.

Health research

Health research is another field where case studies are highly valuable. They offer a way to explore patient experiences, healthcare delivery processes, and the impact of various interventions in a real-world context.

Case studies can provide a deep understanding of a patient's journey, giving insights into the intricacies of disease progression, treatment effects, and the psychosocial aspects of health and illness.

Asthma research studies

Specifically within medical research, studies on asthma often employ case studies to explore the individual and environmental factors that influence asthma development, management, and outcomes. A case study can provide rich, detailed data about individual patients' experiences, from the triggers and symptoms they experience to the effectiveness of various management strategies. This can be crucial for developing patient-centered asthma care approaches.

Other fields

Apart from the fields mentioned, case studies are also extensively used in business and management research, education research, and political sciences, among many others. They provide an opportunity to delve into the intricacies of real-world situations, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of various phenomena.

Case studies, with their depth and contextual focus, offer unique insights across these varied fields. They allow researchers to illuminate the complexities of real-life situations, contributing to both theory and practice.

Whatever field you're in, ATLAS.ti puts your data to work for you

Download a free trial of ATLAS.ti to turn your data into insights.

Understanding the key elements of case study design is crucial for conducting rigorous and impactful case study research. A well-structured design guides the researcher through the process, ensuring that the study is methodologically sound and its findings are reliable and valid. The main elements of case study design include the research question , propositions, units of analysis, and the logic linking the data to the propositions.

The research question is the foundation of any research study. A good research question guides the direction of the study and informs the selection of the case, the methods of collecting data, and the analysis techniques. A well-formulated research question in case study research is typically clear, focused, and complex enough to merit further detailed examination of the relevant case(s).

Propositions

Propositions, though not necessary in every case study, provide a direction by stating what we might expect to find in the data collected. They guide how data is collected and analyzed by helping researchers focus on specific aspects of the case. They are particularly important in explanatory case studies, which seek to understand the relationships among concepts within the studied phenomenon.

Units of analysis

The unit of analysis refers to the case, or the main entity or entities that are being analyzed in the study. In case study research, the unit of analysis can be an individual, a group, an organization, a decision, an event, or even a time period. It's crucial to clearly define the unit of analysis, as it shapes the qualitative data analysis process by allowing the researcher to analyze a particular case and synthesize analysis across multiple case studies to draw conclusions.

Argumentation

This refers to the inferential model that allows researchers to draw conclusions from the data. The researcher needs to ensure that there is a clear link between the data, the propositions (if any), and the conclusions drawn. This argumentation is what enables the researcher to make valid and credible inferences about the phenomenon under study.

Understanding and carefully considering these elements in the design phase of a case study can significantly enhance the quality of the research. It can help ensure that the study is methodologically sound and its findings contribute meaningful insights about the case.

Ready to jumpstart your research with ATLAS.ti?

Conceptualize your research project with our intuitive data analysis interface. Download a free trial today.

Conducting a case study involves several steps, from defining the research question and selecting the case to collecting and analyzing data . This section outlines these key stages, providing a practical guide on how to conduct case study research.

Defining the research question

The first step in case study research is defining a clear, focused research question. This question should guide the entire research process, from case selection to analysis. It's crucial to ensure that the research question is suitable for a case study approach. Typically, such questions are exploratory or descriptive in nature and focus on understanding a phenomenon within its real-life context.

Selecting and defining the case

The selection of the case should be based on the research question and the objectives of the study. It involves choosing a unique example or a set of examples that provide rich, in-depth data about the phenomenon under investigation. After selecting the case, it's crucial to define it clearly, setting the boundaries of the case, including the time period and the specific context.

Previous research can help guide the case study design. When considering a case study, an example of a case could be taken from previous case study research and used to define cases in a new research inquiry. Considering recently published examples can help understand how to select and define cases effectively.

Developing a detailed case study protocol

A case study protocol outlines the procedures and general rules to be followed during the case study. This includes the data collection methods to be used, the sources of data, and the procedures for analysis. Having a detailed case study protocol ensures consistency and reliability in the study.

The protocol should also consider how to work with the people involved in the research context to grant the research team access to collecting data. As mentioned in previous sections of this guide, establishing rapport is an essential component of qualitative research as it shapes the overall potential for collecting and analyzing data.

Collecting data

Gathering data in case study research often involves multiple sources of evidence, including documents, archival records, interviews, observations, and physical artifacts. This allows for a comprehensive understanding of the case. The process for gathering data should be systematic and carefully documented to ensure the reliability and validity of the study.

Analyzing and interpreting data

The next step is analyzing the data. This involves organizing the data , categorizing it into themes or patterns , and interpreting these patterns to answer the research question. The analysis might also involve comparing the findings with prior research or theoretical propositions.

Writing the case study report

The final step is writing the case study report . This should provide a detailed description of the case, the data, the analysis process, and the findings. The report should be clear, organized, and carefully written to ensure that the reader can understand the case and the conclusions drawn from it.

Each of these steps is crucial in ensuring that the case study research is rigorous, reliable, and provides valuable insights about the case.

The type, depth, and quality of data in your study can significantly influence the validity and utility of the study. In case study research, data is usually collected from multiple sources to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the case. This section will outline the various methods of collecting data used in case study research and discuss considerations for ensuring the quality of the data.

Interviews are a common method of gathering data in case study research. They can provide rich, in-depth data about the perspectives, experiences, and interpretations of the individuals involved in the case. Interviews can be structured , semi-structured , or unstructured , depending on the research question and the degree of flexibility needed.

Observations

Observations involve the researcher observing the case in its natural setting, providing first-hand information about the case and its context. Observations can provide data that might not be revealed in interviews or documents, such as non-verbal cues or contextual information.

Documents and artifacts

Documents and archival records provide a valuable source of data in case study research. They can include reports, letters, memos, meeting minutes, email correspondence, and various public and private documents related to the case.

These records can provide historical context, corroborate evidence from other sources, and offer insights into the case that might not be apparent from interviews or observations.

Physical artifacts refer to any physical evidence related to the case, such as tools, products, or physical environments. These artifacts can provide tangible insights into the case, complementing the data gathered from other sources.

Ensuring the quality of data collection

Determining the quality of data in case study research requires careful planning and execution. It's crucial to ensure that the data is reliable, accurate, and relevant to the research question. This involves selecting appropriate methods of collecting data, properly training interviewers or observers, and systematically recording and storing the data. It also includes considering ethical issues related to collecting and handling data, such as obtaining informed consent and ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of the participants.

Data analysis

Analyzing case study research involves making sense of the rich, detailed data to answer the research question. This process can be challenging due to the volume and complexity of case study data. However, a systematic and rigorous approach to analysis can ensure that the findings are credible and meaningful. This section outlines the main steps and considerations in analyzing data in case study research.

Organizing the data

The first step in the analysis is organizing the data. This involves sorting the data into manageable sections, often according to the data source or the theme. This step can also involve transcribing interviews, digitizing physical artifacts, or organizing observational data.

Categorizing and coding the data

Once the data is organized, the next step is to categorize or code the data. This involves identifying common themes, patterns, or concepts in the data and assigning codes to relevant data segments. Coding can be done manually or with the help of software tools, and in either case, qualitative analysis software can greatly facilitate the entire coding process. Coding helps to reduce the data to a set of themes or categories that can be more easily analyzed.

Identifying patterns and themes

After coding the data, the researcher looks for patterns or themes in the coded data. This involves comparing and contrasting the codes and looking for relationships or patterns among them. The identified patterns and themes should help answer the research question.

Interpreting the data

Once patterns and themes have been identified, the next step is to interpret these findings. This involves explaining what the patterns or themes mean in the context of the research question and the case. This interpretation should be grounded in the data, but it can also involve drawing on theoretical concepts or prior research.

Verification of the data

The last step in the analysis is verification. This involves checking the accuracy and consistency of the analysis process and confirming that the findings are supported by the data. This can involve re-checking the original data, checking the consistency of codes, or seeking feedback from research participants or peers.

Like any research method , case study research has its strengths and limitations. Researchers must be aware of these, as they can influence the design, conduct, and interpretation of the study.

Understanding the strengths and limitations of case study research can also guide researchers in deciding whether this approach is suitable for their research question . This section outlines some of the key strengths and limitations of case study research.

Benefits include the following:

• Rich, detailed data: One of the main strengths of case study research is that it can generate rich, detailed data about the case. This can provide a deep understanding of the case and its context, which can be valuable in exploring complex phenomena.
• Flexibility: Case study research is flexible in terms of design , data collection , and analysis . A sufficient degree of flexibility allows the researcher to adapt the study according to the case and the emerging findings.
• Real-world context: Case study research involves studying the case in its real-world context, which can provide valuable insights into the interplay between the case and its context.
• Multiple sources of evidence: Case study research often involves collecting data from multiple sources , which can enhance the robustness and validity of the findings.

On the other hand, researchers should consider the following limitations:

• Generalizability: A common criticism of case study research is that its findings might not be generalizable to other cases due to the specificity and uniqueness of each case.
• Time and resource intensive: Case study research can be time and resource intensive due to the depth of the investigation and the amount of collected data.
• Complexity of analysis: The rich, detailed data generated in case study research can make analyzing the data challenging.
• Subjectivity: Given the nature of case study research, there may be a higher degree of subjectivity in interpreting the data , so researchers need to reflect on this and transparently convey to audiences how the research was conducted.

Being aware of these strengths and limitations can help researchers design and conduct case study research effectively and interpret and report the findings appropriately.

Ready to analyze your data with ATLAS.ti?

See how our intuitive software can draw key insights from your data with a free trial today.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Table of Contents

A case study is a research method that involves an in-depth examination and analysis of a particular phenomenon or case, such as an individual, organization, community, event, or situation.

It is a qualitative research approach that aims to provide a detailed and comprehensive understanding of the case being studied. Case studies typically involve multiple sources of data, including interviews, observations, documents, and artifacts, which are analyzed using various techniques, such as content analysis, thematic analysis, and grounded theory. The findings of a case study are often used to develop theories, inform policy or practice, or generate new research questions.

Types of Case Study

Types and Methods of Case Study are as follows:

Single-Case Study

A single-case study is an in-depth analysis of a single case. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to understand a specific phenomenon in detail.

For Example , A researcher might conduct a single-case study on a particular individual to understand their experiences with a particular health condition or a specific organization to explore their management practices. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of a single-case study are often used to generate new research questions, develop theories, or inform policy or practice.

Multiple-Case Study

A multiple-case study involves the analysis of several cases that are similar in nature. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to identify similarities and differences between the cases.

For Example, a researcher might conduct a multiple-case study on several companies to explore the factors that contribute to their success or failure. The researcher collects data from each case, compares and contrasts the findings, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as comparative analysis or pattern-matching. The findings of a multiple-case study can be used to develop theories, inform policy or practice, or generate new research questions.

Exploratory Case Study

An exploratory case study is used to explore a new or understudied phenomenon. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to generate hypotheses or theories about the phenomenon.

For Example, a researcher might conduct an exploratory case study on a new technology to understand its potential impact on society. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as grounded theory or content analysis. The findings of an exploratory case study can be used to generate new research questions, develop theories, or inform policy or practice.

Descriptive Case Study

A descriptive case study is used to describe a particular phenomenon in detail. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to provide a comprehensive account of the phenomenon.

For Example, a researcher might conduct a descriptive case study on a particular community to understand its social and economic characteristics. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of a descriptive case study can be used to inform policy or practice or generate new research questions.

Instrumental Case Study

An instrumental case study is used to understand a particular phenomenon that is instrumental in achieving a particular goal. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to understand the role of the phenomenon in achieving the goal.

For Example, a researcher might conduct an instrumental case study on a particular policy to understand its impact on achieving a particular goal, such as reducing poverty. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of an instrumental case study can be used to inform policy or practice or generate new research questions.

Case Study Data Collection Methods

Here are some common data collection methods for case studies:

Interviews involve asking questions to individuals who have knowledge or experience relevant to the case study. Interviews can be structured (where the same questions are asked to all participants) or unstructured (where the interviewer follows up on the responses with further questions). Interviews can be conducted in person, over the phone, or through video conferencing.

Observations

Observations involve watching and recording the behavior and activities of individuals or groups relevant to the case study. Observations can be participant (where the researcher actively participates in the activities) or non-participant (where the researcher observes from a distance). Observations can be recorded using notes, audio or video recordings, or photographs.

Documents can be used as a source of information for case studies. Documents can include reports, memos, emails, letters, and other written materials related to the case study. Documents can be collected from the case study participants or from public sources.

Surveys involve asking a set of questions to a sample of individuals relevant to the case study. Surveys can be administered in person, over the phone, through mail or email, or online. Surveys can be used to gather information on attitudes, opinions, or behaviors related to the case study.

Artifacts are physical objects relevant to the case study. Artifacts can include tools, equipment, products, or other objects that provide insights into the case study phenomenon.

How to conduct Case Study Research

Conducting a case study research involves several steps that need to be followed to ensure the quality and rigor of the study. Here are the steps to conduct case study research:

• Define the research questions: The first step in conducting a case study research is to define the research questions. The research questions should be specific, measurable, and relevant to the case study phenomenon under investigation.
• Select the case: The next step is to select the case or cases to be studied. The case should be relevant to the research questions and should provide rich and diverse data that can be used to answer the research questions.
• Collect data: Data can be collected using various methods, such as interviews, observations, documents, surveys, and artifacts. The data collection method should be selected based on the research questions and the nature of the case study phenomenon.
• Analyze the data: The data collected from the case study should be analyzed using various techniques, such as content analysis, thematic analysis, or grounded theory. The analysis should be guided by the research questions and should aim to provide insights and conclusions relevant to the research questions.
• Draw conclusions: The conclusions drawn from the case study should be based on the data analysis and should be relevant to the research questions. The conclusions should be supported by evidence and should be clearly stated.
• Validate the findings: The findings of the case study should be validated by reviewing the data and the analysis with participants or other experts in the field. This helps to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings.
• Write the report: The final step is to write the report of the case study research. The report should provide a clear description of the case study phenomenon, the research questions, the data collection methods, the data analysis, the findings, and the conclusions. The report should be written in a clear and concise manner and should follow the guidelines for academic writing.

Examples of Case Study

Here are some examples of case study research:

• The Hawthorne Studies : Conducted between 1924 and 1932, the Hawthorne Studies were a series of case studies conducted by Elton Mayo and his colleagues to examine the impact of work environment on employee productivity. The studies were conducted at the Hawthorne Works plant of the Western Electric Company in Chicago and included interviews, observations, and experiments.
• The Stanford Prison Experiment: Conducted in 1971, the Stanford Prison Experiment was a case study conducted by Philip Zimbardo to examine the psychological effects of power and authority. The study involved simulating a prison environment and assigning participants to the role of guards or prisoners. The study was controversial due to the ethical issues it raised.
• The Challenger Disaster: The Challenger Disaster was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion in 1986. The study included interviews, observations, and analysis of data to identify the technical, organizational, and cultural factors that contributed to the disaster.
• The Enron Scandal: The Enron Scandal was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the Enron Corporation’s bankruptcy in 2001. The study included interviews, analysis of financial data, and review of documents to identify the accounting practices, corporate culture, and ethical issues that led to the company’s downfall.
• The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster : The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the nuclear accident that occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan in 2011. The study included interviews, analysis of data, and review of documents to identify the technical, organizational, and cultural factors that contributed to the disaster.

Application of Case Study

Case studies have a wide range of applications across various fields and industries. Here are some examples:

Business and Management

Case studies are widely used in business and management to examine real-life situations and develop problem-solving skills. Case studies can help students and professionals to develop a deep understanding of business concepts, theories, and best practices.

Case studies are used in healthcare to examine patient care, treatment options, and outcomes. Case studies can help healthcare professionals to develop critical thinking skills, diagnose complex medical conditions, and develop effective treatment plans.

Case studies are used in education to examine teaching and learning practices. Case studies can help educators to develop effective teaching strategies, evaluate student progress, and identify areas for improvement.

Social Sciences

Case studies are widely used in social sciences to examine human behavior, social phenomena, and cultural practices. Case studies can help researchers to develop theories, test hypotheses, and gain insights into complex social issues.

Law and Ethics

Case studies are used in law and ethics to examine legal and ethical dilemmas. Case studies can help lawyers, policymakers, and ethical professionals to develop critical thinking skills, analyze complex cases, and make informed decisions.

Purpose of Case Study

The purpose of a case study is to provide a detailed analysis of a specific phenomenon, issue, or problem in its real-life context. A case study is a qualitative research method that involves the in-depth exploration and analysis of a particular case, which can be an individual, group, organization, event, or community.

The primary purpose of a case study is to generate a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the case, including its history, context, and dynamics. Case studies can help researchers to identify and examine the underlying factors, processes, and mechanisms that contribute to the case and its outcomes. This can help to develop a more accurate and detailed understanding of the case, which can inform future research, practice, or policy.

Case studies can also serve other purposes, including:

• Illustrating a theory or concept: Case studies can be used to illustrate and explain theoretical concepts and frameworks, providing concrete examples of how they can be applied in real-life situations.
• Developing hypotheses: Case studies can help to generate hypotheses about the causal relationships between different factors and outcomes, which can be tested through further research.
• Providing insight into complex issues: Case studies can provide insights into complex and multifaceted issues, which may be difficult to understand through other research methods.
• Informing practice or policy: Case studies can be used to inform practice or policy by identifying best practices, lessons learned, or areas for improvement.

Advantages of Case Study Research

There are several advantages of case study research, including:

• In-depth exploration: Case study research allows for a detailed exploration and analysis of a specific phenomenon, issue, or problem in its real-life context. This can provide a comprehensive understanding of the case and its dynamics, which may not be possible through other research methods.
• Rich data: Case study research can generate rich and detailed data, including qualitative data such as interviews, observations, and documents. This can provide a nuanced understanding of the case and its complexity.
• Holistic perspective: Case study research allows for a holistic perspective of the case, taking into account the various factors, processes, and mechanisms that contribute to the case and its outcomes. This can help to develop a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the case.
• Theory development: Case study research can help to develop and refine theories and concepts by providing empirical evidence and concrete examples of how they can be applied in real-life situations.
• Practical application: Case study research can inform practice or policy by identifying best practices, lessons learned, or areas for improvement.
• Contextualization: Case study research takes into account the specific context in which the case is situated, which can help to understand how the case is influenced by the social, cultural, and historical factors of its environment.

Limitations of Case Study Research

There are several limitations of case study research, including:

• Limited generalizability : Case studies are typically focused on a single case or a small number of cases, which limits the generalizability of the findings. The unique characteristics of the case may not be applicable to other contexts or populations, which may limit the external validity of the research.
• Biased sampling: Case studies may rely on purposive or convenience sampling, which can introduce bias into the sample selection process. This may limit the representativeness of the sample and the generalizability of the findings.
• Subjectivity: Case studies rely on the interpretation of the researcher, which can introduce subjectivity into the analysis. The researcher’s own biases, assumptions, and perspectives may influence the findings, which may limit the objectivity of the research.
• Limited control: Case studies are typically conducted in naturalistic settings, which limits the control that the researcher has over the environment and the variables being studied. This may limit the ability to establish causal relationships between variables.
• Time-consuming: Case studies can be time-consuming to conduct, as they typically involve a detailed exploration and analysis of a specific case. This may limit the feasibility of conducting multiple case studies or conducting case studies in a timely manner.
• Resource-intensive: Case studies may require significant resources, including time, funding, and expertise. This may limit the ability of researchers to conduct case studies in resource-constrained settings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Questionnaire – Definition, Types, and Examples

Observational Research – Methods and Guide

Quantitative Research – Methods, Types and...

Qualitative Research Methods

Explanatory Research – Types, Methods, Guide

Survey Research – Types, Methods, Examples

Case Study Research Method in Psychology

Saul Mcleod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul Mcleod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

Case studies are in-depth investigations of a person, group, event, or community. Typically, data is gathered from various sources using several methods (e.g., observations & interviews).

The case study research method originated in clinical medicine (the case history, i.e., the patient’s personal history). In psychology, case studies are often confined to the study of a particular individual.

The information is mainly biographical and relates to events in the individual’s past (i.e., retrospective), as well as to significant events that are currently occurring in his or her everyday life.

The case study is not a research method, but researchers select methods of data collection and analysis that will generate material suitable for case studies.

Freud (1909a, 1909b) conducted very detailed investigations into the private lives of his patients in an attempt to both understand and help them overcome their illnesses.

This makes it clear that the case study is a method that should only be used by a psychologist, therapist, or psychiatrist, i.e., someone with a professional qualification.

There is an ethical issue of competence. Only someone qualified to diagnose and treat a person can conduct a formal case study relating to atypical (i.e., abnormal) behavior or atypical development.

 Famous Case Studies

• Anna O – One of the most famous case studies, documenting psychoanalyst Josef Breuer’s treatment of “Anna O” (real name Bertha Pappenheim) for hysteria in the late 1800s using early psychoanalytic theory.
• Little Hans – A child psychoanalysis case study published by Sigmund Freud in 1909 analyzing his five-year-old patient Herbert Graf’s house phobia as related to the Oedipus complex.
• Bruce/Brenda – Gender identity case of the boy (Bruce) whose botched circumcision led psychologist John Money to advise gender reassignment and raise him as a girl (Brenda) in the 1960s.
• Genie Wiley – Linguistics/psychological development case of the victim of extreme isolation abuse who was studied in 1970s California for effects of early language deprivation on acquiring speech later in life.
• Phineas Gage – One of the most famous neuropsychology case studies analyzes personality changes in railroad worker Phineas Gage after an 1848 brain injury involving a tamping iron piercing his skull.

Clinical Case Studies

• Studying the effectiveness of psychotherapy approaches with an individual patient
• Assessing and treating mental illnesses like depression, anxiety disorders, PTSD
• Neuropsychological cases investigating brain injuries or disorders

Child Psychology Case Studies

• Studying psychological development from birth through adolescence
• Cases of learning disabilities, autism spectrum disorders, ADHD
• Effects of trauma, abuse, deprivation on development

Types of Case Studies

• Explanatory case studies : Used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles. Helpful for doing qualitative analysis to explain presumed causal links.
• Exploratory case studies : Used to explore situations where an intervention being evaluated has no clear set of outcomes. It helps define questions and hypotheses for future research.
• Descriptive case studies : Describe an intervention or phenomenon and the real-life context in which it occurred. It is helpful for illustrating certain topics within an evaluation.
• Multiple-case studies : Used to explore differences between cases and replicate findings across cases. Helpful for comparing and contrasting specific cases.
• Intrinsic : Used to gain a better understanding of a particular case. Helpful for capturing the complexity of a single case.
• Collective : Used to explore a general phenomenon using multiple case studies. Helpful for jointly studying a group of cases in order to inquire into the phenomenon.

Where Do You Find Data for a Case Study?

There are several places to find data for a case study. The key is to gather data from multiple sources to get a complete picture of the case and corroborate facts or findings through triangulation of evidence. Most of this information is likely qualitative (i.e., verbal description rather than measurement), but the psychologist might also collect numerical data.

1. Primary sources

• Interviews – Interviewing key people related to the case to get their perspectives and insights. The interview is an extremely effective procedure for obtaining information about an individual, and it may be used to collect comments from the person’s friends, parents, employer, workmates, and others who have a good knowledge of the person, as well as to obtain facts from the person him or herself.
• Observations – Observing behaviors, interactions, processes, etc., related to the case as they unfold in real-time.
• Documents & Records – Reviewing private documents, diaries, public records, correspondence, meeting minutes, etc., relevant to the case.

2. Secondary sources

• News/Media – News coverage of events related to the case study.
• Academic articles – Journal articles, dissertations etc. that discuss the case.
• Government reports – Official data and records related to the case context.
• Books/films – Books, documentaries or films discussing the case.

3. Archival records

Searching historical archives, museum collections and databases to find relevant documents, visual/audio records related to the case history and context.

Public archives like newspapers, organizational records, photographic collections could all include potentially relevant pieces of information to shed light on attitudes, cultural perspectives, common practices and historical contexts related to psychology.

4. Organizational records

Organizational records offer the advantage of often having large datasets collected over time that can reveal or confirm psychological insights.

Of course, privacy and ethical concerns regarding confidential data must be navigated carefully.

However, with proper protocols, organizational records can provide invaluable context and empirical depth to qualitative case studies exploring the intersection of psychology and organizations.

• Organizational/industrial psychology research : Organizational records like employee surveys, turnover/retention data, policies, incident reports etc. may provide insight into topics like job satisfaction, workplace culture and dynamics, leadership issues, employee behaviors etc.
• Clinical psychology : Therapists/hospitals may grant access to anonymized medical records to study aspects like assessments, diagnoses, treatment plans etc. This could shed light on clinical practices.
• School psychology : Studies could utilize anonymized student records like test scores, grades, disciplinary issues, and counseling referrals to study child development, learning barriers, effectiveness of support programs, and more.

How do I Write a Case Study in Psychology?

Follow specified case study guidelines provided by a journal or your psychology tutor. General components of clinical case studies include: background, symptoms, assessments, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Interpreting the information means the researcher decides what to include or leave out. A good case study should always clarify which information is the factual description and which is an inference or the researcher’s opinion.

1. Introduction

• Provide background on the case context and why it is of interest, presenting background information like demographics, relevant history, and presenting problem.
• Compare briefly to similar published cases if applicable. Clearly state the focus/importance of the case.

2. Case Presentation

• Describe the presenting problem in detail, including symptoms, duration,and impact on daily life.
• Include client demographics like age and gender, information about social relationships, and mental health history.
• Describe all physical, emotional, and/or sensory symptoms reported by the client.
• Use patient quotes to describe the initial complaint verbatim. Follow with full-sentence summaries of relevant history details gathered, including key components that led to a working diagnosis.
• Summarize clinical exam results, namely orthopedic/neurological tests, imaging, lab tests, etc. Note actual results rather than subjective conclusions. Provide images if clearly reproducible/anonymized.
• Clearly state the working diagnosis or clinical impression before transitioning to management.

3. Management and Outcome

• Indicate the total duration of care and number of treatments given over what timeframe. Use specific names/descriptions for any therapies/interventions applied.
• Present the results of the intervention,including any quantitative or qualitative data collected.
• For outcomes, utilize visual analog scales for pain, medication usage logs, etc., if possible. Include patient self-reports of improvement/worsening of symptoms. Note the reason for discharge/end of care.

4. Discussion

• Analyze the case, exploring contributing factors, limitations of the study, and connections to existing research.
• Analyze the effectiveness of the intervention,considering factors like participant adherence, limitations of the study, and potential alternative explanations for the results.
• Identify any questions raised in the case analysis and relate insights to established theories and current research if applicable. Avoid definitive claims about physiological explanations.
• Offer clinical implications, and suggest future research directions.

5. Additional Items

• Thank specific assistants for writing support only. No patient acknowledgments.
• References should directly support any key claims or quotes included.
• Use tables/figures/images only if substantially informative. Include permissions and legends/explanatory notes.
• Provides detailed (rich qualitative) information.
• Provides insight for further research.
• Permitting investigation of otherwise impractical (or unethical) situations.

Case studies allow a researcher to investigate a topic in far more detail than might be possible if they were trying to deal with a large number of research participants (nomothetic approach) with the aim of ‘averaging’.

Because of their in-depth, multi-sided approach, case studies often shed light on aspects of human thinking and behavior that would be unethical or impractical to study in other ways.

Research that only looks into the measurable aspects of human behavior is not likely to give us insights into the subjective dimension of experience, which is important to psychoanalytic and humanistic psychologists.

Case studies are often used in exploratory research. They can help us generate new ideas (that might be tested by other methods). They are an important way of illustrating theories and can help show how different aspects of a person’s life are related to each other.

The method is, therefore, important for psychologists who adopt a holistic point of view (i.e., humanistic psychologists ).

Limitations

• Lacking scientific rigor and providing little basis for generalization of results to the wider population.
• Researchers’ own subjective feelings may influence the case study (researcher bias).
• Difficult to replicate.
• Time-consuming and expensive.
• The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources.

Because a case study deals with only one person/event/group, we can never be sure if the case study investigated is representative of the wider body of “similar” instances. This means the conclusions drawn from a particular case may not be transferable to other settings.

Because case studies are based on the analysis of qualitative (i.e., descriptive) data , a lot depends on the psychologist’s interpretation of the information she has acquired.

This means that there is a lot of scope for Anna O , and it could be that the subjective opinions of the psychologist intrude in the assessment of what the data means.

For example, Freud has been criticized for producing case studies in which the information was sometimes distorted to fit particular behavioral theories (e.g., Little Hans ).

This is also true of Money’s interpretation of the Bruce/Brenda case study (Diamond, 1997) when he ignored evidence that went against his theory.

Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1895).  Studies on hysteria . Standard Edition 2: London.

Curtiss, S. (1981). Genie: The case of a modern wild child .

Diamond, M., & Sigmundson, K. (1997). Sex Reassignment at Birth: Long-term Review and Clinical Implications. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine , 151(3), 298-304

Freud, S. (1909a). Analysis of a phobia of a five year old boy. In The Pelican Freud Library (1977), Vol 8, Case Histories 1, pages 169-306

Freud, S. (1909b). Bemerkungen über einen Fall von Zwangsneurose (Der “Rattenmann”). Jb. psychoanal. psychopathol. Forsch ., I, p. 357-421; GW, VII, p. 379-463; Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis, SE , 10: 151-318.

Harlow J. M. (1848). Passage of an iron rod through the head.  Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, 39 , 389–393.

Harlow, J. M. (1868).  Recovery from the Passage of an Iron Bar through the Head .  Publications of the Massachusetts Medical Society. 2  (3), 327-347.

Money, J., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (1972).  Man & Woman, Boy & Girl : The Differentiation and Dimorphism of Gender Identity from Conception to Maturity. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Money, J., & Tucker, P. (1975). Sexual signatures: On being a man or a woman.

Further Information

• Case Study Approach
• Case Study Method
• Enhancing the Quality of Case Studies in Health Services Research
• “We do things together” A case study of “couplehood” in dementia
• Using mixed methods for evaluating an integrative approach to cancer care: a case study

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Best Family Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

What Is a Case Study?

Weighing the pros and cons of this method of research

Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Cara Lustik is a fact-checker and copywriter.

Verywell / Colleen Tighe

• Pros and Cons

What Types of Case Studies Are Out There?

Where do you find data for a case study, how do i write a psychology case study.

A case study is an in-depth study of one person, group, or event. In a case study, nearly every aspect of the subject's life and history is analyzed to seek patterns and causes of behavior. Case studies can be used in many different fields, including psychology, medicine, education, anthropology, political science, and social work.

The point of a case study is to learn as much as possible about an individual or group so that the information can be generalized to many others. Unfortunately, case studies tend to be highly subjective, and it is sometimes difficult to generalize results to a larger population.

While case studies focus on a single individual or group, they follow a format similar to other types of psychology writing. If you are writing a case study, we got you—here are some rules of APA format to reference.  

At a Glance

A case study, or an in-depth study of a person, group, or event, can be a useful research tool when used wisely. In many cases, case studies are best used in situations where it would be difficult or impossible for you to conduct an experiment. They are helpful for looking at unique situations and allow researchers to gather a lot of˜ information about a specific individual or group of people. However, it's important to be cautious of any bias we draw from them as they are highly subjective.

What Are the Benefits and Limitations of Case Studies?

A case study can have its strengths and weaknesses. Researchers must consider these pros and cons before deciding if this type of study is appropriate for their needs.

One of the greatest advantages of a case study is that it allows researchers to investigate things that are often difficult or impossible to replicate in a lab. Some other benefits of a case study:

• Allows researchers to capture information on the 'how,' 'what,' and 'why,' of something that's implemented
• Gives researchers the chance to collect information on why one strategy might be chosen over another
• Permits researchers to develop hypotheses that can be explored in experimental research

On the other hand, a case study can have some drawbacks:

• It cannot necessarily be generalized to the larger population
• Cannot demonstrate cause and effect
• It may not be scientifically rigorous
• It can lead to bias

Researchers may choose to perform a case study if they want to explore a unique or recently discovered phenomenon. Through their insights, researchers develop additional ideas and study questions that might be explored in future studies.

It's important to remember that the insights from case studies cannot be used to determine cause-and-effect relationships between variables. However, case studies may be used to develop hypotheses that can then be addressed in experimental research.

Case Study Examples

There have been a number of notable case studies in the history of psychology. Much of  Freud's work and theories were developed through individual case studies. Some great examples of case studies in psychology include:

• Anna O : Anna O. was a pseudonym of a woman named Bertha Pappenheim, a patient of a physician named Josef Breuer. While she was never a patient of Freud's, Freud and Breuer discussed her case extensively. The woman was experiencing symptoms of a condition that was then known as hysteria and found that talking about her problems helped relieve her symptoms. Her case played an important part in the development of talk therapy as an approach to mental health treatment.
• Phineas Gage : Phineas Gage was a railroad employee who experienced a terrible accident in which an explosion sent a metal rod through his skull, damaging important portions of his brain. Gage recovered from his accident but was left with serious changes in both personality and behavior.
• Genie : Genie was a young girl subjected to horrific abuse and isolation. The case study of Genie allowed researchers to study whether language learning was possible, even after missing critical periods for language development. Her case also served as an example of how scientific research may interfere with treatment and lead to further abuse of vulnerable individuals.

Such cases demonstrate how case research can be used to study things that researchers could not replicate in experimental settings. In Genie's case, her horrific abuse denied her the opportunity to learn a language at critical points in her development.

This is clearly not something researchers could ethically replicate, but conducting a case study on Genie allowed researchers to study phenomena that are otherwise impossible to reproduce.

There are a few different types of case studies that psychologists and other researchers might use:

• Collective case studies : These involve studying a group of individuals. Researchers might study a group of people in a certain setting or look at an entire community. For example, psychologists might explore how access to resources in a community has affected the collective mental well-being of those who live there.
• Descriptive case studies : These involve starting with a descriptive theory. The subjects are then observed, and the information gathered is compared to the pre-existing theory.
• Explanatory case studies : These   are often used to do causal investigations. In other words, researchers are interested in looking at factors that may have caused certain things to occur.
• Exploratory case studies : These are sometimes used as a prelude to further, more in-depth research. This allows researchers to gather more information before developing their research questions and hypotheses .
• Instrumental case studies : These occur when the individual or group allows researchers to understand more than what is initially obvious to observers.
• Intrinsic case studies : This type of case study is when the researcher has a personal interest in the case. Jean Piaget's observations of his own children are good examples of how an intrinsic case study can contribute to the development of a psychological theory.

The three main case study types often used are intrinsic, instrumental, and collective. Intrinsic case studies are useful for learning about unique cases. Instrumental case studies help look at an individual to learn more about a broader issue. A collective case study can be useful for looking at several cases simultaneously.

The type of case study that psychology researchers use depends on the unique characteristics of the situation and the case itself.

There are a number of different sources and methods that researchers can use to gather information about an individual or group. Six major sources that have been identified by researchers are:

• Archival records : Census records, survey records, and name lists are examples of archival records.
• Direct observation : This strategy involves observing the subject, often in a natural setting . While an individual observer is sometimes used, it is more common to utilize a group of observers.
• Documents : Letters, newspaper articles, administrative records, etc., are the types of documents often used as sources.
• Interviews : Interviews are one of the most important methods for gathering information in case studies. An interview can involve structured survey questions or more open-ended questions.
• Participant observation : When the researcher serves as a participant in events and observes the actions and outcomes, it is called participant observation.
• Physical artifacts : Tools, objects, instruments, and other artifacts are often observed during a direct observation of the subject.

If you have been directed to write a case study for a psychology course, be sure to check with your instructor for any specific guidelines you need to follow. If you are writing your case study for a professional publication, check with the publisher for their specific guidelines for submitting a case study.

Here is a general outline of what should be included in a case study.

Section 1: A Case History

This section will have the following structure and content:

Background information : The first section of your paper will present your client's background. Include factors such as age, gender, work, health status, family mental health history, family and social relationships, drug and alcohol history, life difficulties, goals, and coping skills and weaknesses.

Description of the presenting problem : In the next section of your case study, you will describe the problem or symptoms that the client presented with.

Describe any physical, emotional, or sensory symptoms reported by the client. Thoughts, feelings, and perceptions related to the symptoms should also be noted. Any screening or diagnostic assessments that are used should also be described in detail and all scores reported.

Your diagnosis : Provide your diagnosis and give the appropriate Diagnostic and Statistical Manual code. Explain how you reached your diagnosis, how the client's symptoms fit the diagnostic criteria for the disorder(s), or any possible difficulties in reaching a diagnosis.

Section 2: Treatment Plan

This portion of the paper will address the chosen treatment for the condition. This might also include the theoretical basis for the chosen treatment or any other evidence that might exist to support why this approach was chosen.

• Cognitive behavioral approach : Explain how a cognitive behavioral therapist would approach treatment. Offer background information on cognitive behavioral therapy and describe the treatment sessions, client response, and outcome of this type of treatment. Make note of any difficulties or successes encountered by your client during treatment.
• Humanistic approach : Describe a humanistic approach that could be used to treat your client, such as client-centered therapy . Provide information on the type of treatment you chose, the client's reaction to the treatment, and the end result of this approach. Explain why the treatment was successful or unsuccessful.
• Psychoanalytic approach : Describe how a psychoanalytic therapist would view the client's problem. Provide some background on the psychoanalytic approach and cite relevant references. Explain how psychoanalytic therapy would be used to treat the client, how the client would respond to therapy, and the effectiveness of this treatment approach.
• Pharmacological approach : If treatment primarily involves the use of medications, explain which medications were used and why. Provide background on the effectiveness of these medications and how monotherapy may compare with an approach that combines medications with therapy or other treatments.

This section of a case study should also include information about the treatment goals, process, and outcomes.

When you are writing a case study, you should also include a section where you discuss the case study itself, including the strengths and limitiations of the study. You should note how the findings of your case study might support previous research. 

In your discussion section, you should also describe some of the implications of your case study. What ideas or findings might require further exploration? How might researchers go about exploring some of these questions in additional studies?

Need More Tips?

Here are a few additional pointers to keep in mind when formatting your case study:

• Never refer to the subject of your case study as "the client." Instead, use their name or a pseudonym.
• Read examples of case studies to gain an idea about the style and format.
• Remember to use APA format when citing references .

Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach .  BMC Med Res Methodol . 2011;11:100.

Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2011 Jun 27;11:100. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Gagnon, Yves-Chantal.  The Case Study as Research Method: A Practical Handbook . Canada, Chicago Review Press Incorporated DBA Independent Pub Group, 2010.

Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods . United States, SAGE Publications, 2017.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

• Open access
• Published: 27 June 2011

The case study approach

• Sarah Crowe 1 ,
• Kathrin Cresswell 2 ,
• Ann Robertson 2 ,
• Guro Huby 3 ,
• Anthony Avery 1 &
• Aziz Sheikh 2  

BMC Medical Research Methodology volume  11 , Article number:  100 ( 2011 ) Cite this article

777k Accesses

1039 Citations

37 Altmetric

Metrics details

The case study approach allows in-depth, multi-faceted explorations of complex issues in their real-life settings. The value of the case study approach is well recognised in the fields of business, law and policy, but somewhat less so in health services research. Based on our experiences of conducting several health-related case studies, we reflect on the different types of case study design, the specific research questions this approach can help answer, the data sources that tend to be used, and the particular advantages and disadvantages of employing this methodological approach. The paper concludes with key pointers to aid those designing and appraising proposals for conducting case study research, and a checklist to help readers assess the quality of case study reports.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The case study approach is particularly useful to employ when there is a need to obtain an in-depth appreciation of an issue, event or phenomenon of interest, in its natural real-life context. Our aim in writing this piece is to provide insights into when to consider employing this approach and an overview of key methodological considerations in relation to the design, planning, analysis, interpretation and reporting of case studies.

The illustrative 'grand round', 'case report' and 'case series' have a long tradition in clinical practice and research. Presenting detailed critiques, typically of one or more patients, aims to provide insights into aspects of the clinical case and, in doing so, illustrate broader lessons that may be learnt. In research, the conceptually-related case study approach can be used, for example, to describe in detail a patient's episode of care, explore professional attitudes to and experiences of a new policy initiative or service development or more generally to 'investigate contemporary phenomena within its real-life context' [ 1 ]. Based on our experiences of conducting a range of case studies, we reflect on when to consider using this approach, discuss the key steps involved and illustrate, with examples, some of the practical challenges of attaining an in-depth understanding of a 'case' as an integrated whole. In keeping with previously published work, we acknowledge the importance of theory to underpin the design, selection, conduct and interpretation of case studies[ 2 ]. In so doing, we make passing reference to the different epistemological approaches used in case study research by key theoreticians and methodologists in this field of enquiry.

This paper is structured around the following main questions: What is a case study? What are case studies used for? How are case studies conducted? What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided? We draw in particular on four of our own recently published examples of case studies (see Tables 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 ) and those of others to illustrate our discussion[ 3 – 7 ].

What is a case study?

A case study is a research approach that is used to generate an in-depth, multi-faceted understanding of a complex issue in its real-life context. It is an established research design that is used extensively in a wide variety of disciplines, particularly in the social sciences. A case study can be defined in a variety of ways (Table 5 ), the central tenet being the need to explore an event or phenomenon in depth and in its natural context. It is for this reason sometimes referred to as a "naturalistic" design; this is in contrast to an "experimental" design (such as a randomised controlled trial) in which the investigator seeks to exert control over and manipulate the variable(s) of interest.

Stake's work has been particularly influential in defining the case study approach to scientific enquiry. He has helpfully characterised three main types of case study: intrinsic , instrumental and collective [ 8 ]. An intrinsic case study is typically undertaken to learn about a unique phenomenon. The researcher should define the uniqueness of the phenomenon, which distinguishes it from all others. In contrast, the instrumental case study uses a particular case (some of which may be better than others) to gain a broader appreciation of an issue or phenomenon. The collective case study involves studying multiple cases simultaneously or sequentially in an attempt to generate a still broader appreciation of a particular issue.

These are however not necessarily mutually exclusive categories. In the first of our examples (Table 1 ), we undertook an intrinsic case study to investigate the issue of recruitment of minority ethnic people into the specific context of asthma research studies, but it developed into a instrumental case study through seeking to understand the issue of recruitment of these marginalised populations more generally, generating a number of the findings that are potentially transferable to other disease contexts[ 3 ]. In contrast, the other three examples (see Tables 2 , 3 and 4 ) employed collective case study designs to study the introduction of workforce reconfiguration in primary care, the implementation of electronic health records into hospitals, and to understand the ways in which healthcare students learn about patient safety considerations[ 4 – 6 ]. Although our study focusing on the introduction of General Practitioners with Specialist Interests (Table 2 ) was explicitly collective in design (four contrasting primary care organisations were studied), is was also instrumental in that this particular professional group was studied as an exemplar of the more general phenomenon of workforce redesign[ 4 ].

What are case studies used for?

According to Yin, case studies can be used to explain, describe or explore events or phenomena in the everyday contexts in which they occur[ 1 ]. These can, for example, help to understand and explain causal links and pathways resulting from a new policy initiative or service development (see Tables 2 and 3 , for example)[ 1 ]. In contrast to experimental designs, which seek to test a specific hypothesis through deliberately manipulating the environment (like, for example, in a randomised controlled trial giving a new drug to randomly selected individuals and then comparing outcomes with controls),[ 9 ] the case study approach lends itself well to capturing information on more explanatory ' how ', 'what' and ' why ' questions, such as ' how is the intervention being implemented and received on the ground?'. The case study approach can offer additional insights into what gaps exist in its delivery or why one implementation strategy might be chosen over another. This in turn can help develop or refine theory, as shown in our study of the teaching of patient safety in undergraduate curricula (Table 4 )[ 6 , 10 ]. Key questions to consider when selecting the most appropriate study design are whether it is desirable or indeed possible to undertake a formal experimental investigation in which individuals and/or organisations are allocated to an intervention or control arm? Or whether the wish is to obtain a more naturalistic understanding of an issue? The former is ideally studied using a controlled experimental design, whereas the latter is more appropriately studied using a case study design.

Case studies may be approached in different ways depending on the epistemological standpoint of the researcher, that is, whether they take a critical (questioning one's own and others' assumptions), interpretivist (trying to understand individual and shared social meanings) or positivist approach (orientating towards the criteria of natural sciences, such as focusing on generalisability considerations) (Table 6 ). Whilst such a schema can be conceptually helpful, it may be appropriate to draw on more than one approach in any case study, particularly in the context of conducting health services research. Doolin has, for example, noted that in the context of undertaking interpretative case studies, researchers can usefully draw on a critical, reflective perspective which seeks to take into account the wider social and political environment that has shaped the case[ 11 ].

How are case studies conducted?

Here, we focus on the main stages of research activity when planning and undertaking a case study; the crucial stages are: defining the case; selecting the case(s); collecting and analysing the data; interpreting data; and reporting the findings.

Defining the case

Carefully formulated research question(s), informed by the existing literature and a prior appreciation of the theoretical issues and setting(s), are all important in appropriately and succinctly defining the case[ 8 , 12 ]. Crucially, each case should have a pre-defined boundary which clarifies the nature and time period covered by the case study (i.e. its scope, beginning and end), the relevant social group, organisation or geographical area of interest to the investigator, the types of evidence to be collected, and the priorities for data collection and analysis (see Table 7 )[ 1 ]. A theory driven approach to defining the case may help generate knowledge that is potentially transferable to a range of clinical contexts and behaviours; using theory is also likely to result in a more informed appreciation of, for example, how and why interventions have succeeded or failed[ 13 ].

For example, in our evaluation of the introduction of electronic health records in English hospitals (Table 3 ), we defined our cases as the NHS Trusts that were receiving the new technology[ 5 ]. Our focus was on how the technology was being implemented. However, if the primary research interest had been on the social and organisational dimensions of implementation, we might have defined our case differently as a grouping of healthcare professionals (e.g. doctors and/or nurses). The precise beginning and end of the case may however prove difficult to define. Pursuing this same example, when does the process of implementation and adoption of an electronic health record system really begin or end? Such judgements will inevitably be influenced by a range of factors, including the research question, theory of interest, the scope and richness of the gathered data and the resources available to the research team.

Selecting the case(s)

The decision on how to select the case(s) to study is a very important one that merits some reflection. In an intrinsic case study, the case is selected on its own merits[ 8 ]. The case is selected not because it is representative of other cases, but because of its uniqueness, which is of genuine interest to the researchers. This was, for example, the case in our study of the recruitment of minority ethnic participants into asthma research (Table 1 ) as our earlier work had demonstrated the marginalisation of minority ethnic people with asthma, despite evidence of disproportionate asthma morbidity[ 14 , 15 ]. In another example of an intrinsic case study, Hellstrom et al.[ 16 ] studied an elderly married couple living with dementia to explore how dementia had impacted on their understanding of home, their everyday life and their relationships.

For an instrumental case study, selecting a "typical" case can work well[ 8 ]. In contrast to the intrinsic case study, the particular case which is chosen is of less importance than selecting a case that allows the researcher to investigate an issue or phenomenon. For example, in order to gain an understanding of doctors' responses to health policy initiatives, Som undertook an instrumental case study interviewing clinicians who had a range of responsibilities for clinical governance in one NHS acute hospital trust[ 17 ]. Sampling a "deviant" or "atypical" case may however prove even more informative, potentially enabling the researcher to identify causal processes, generate hypotheses and develop theory.

In collective or multiple case studies, a number of cases are carefully selected. This offers the advantage of allowing comparisons to be made across several cases and/or replication. Choosing a "typical" case may enable the findings to be generalised to theory (i.e. analytical generalisation) or to test theory by replicating the findings in a second or even a third case (i.e. replication logic)[ 1 ]. Yin suggests two or three literal replications (i.e. predicting similar results) if the theory is straightforward and five or more if the theory is more subtle. However, critics might argue that selecting 'cases' in this way is insufficiently reflexive and ill-suited to the complexities of contemporary healthcare organisations.

The selected case study site(s) should allow the research team access to the group of individuals, the organisation, the processes or whatever else constitutes the chosen unit of analysis for the study. Access is therefore a central consideration; the researcher needs to come to know the case study site(s) well and to work cooperatively with them. Selected cases need to be not only interesting but also hospitable to the inquiry [ 8 ] if they are to be informative and answer the research question(s). Case study sites may also be pre-selected for the researcher, with decisions being influenced by key stakeholders. For example, our selection of case study sites in the evaluation of the implementation and adoption of electronic health record systems (see Table 3 ) was heavily influenced by NHS Connecting for Health, the government agency that was responsible for overseeing the National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT)[ 5 ]. This prominent stakeholder had already selected the NHS sites (through a competitive bidding process) to be early adopters of the electronic health record systems and had negotiated contracts that detailed the deployment timelines.

It is also important to consider in advance the likely burden and risks associated with participation for those who (or the site(s) which) comprise the case study. Of particular importance is the obligation for the researcher to think through the ethical implications of the study (e.g. the risk of inadvertently breaching anonymity or confidentiality) and to ensure that potential participants/participating sites are provided with sufficient information to make an informed choice about joining the study. The outcome of providing this information might be that the emotive burden associated with participation, or the organisational disruption associated with supporting the fieldwork, is considered so high that the individuals or sites decide against participation.

In our example of evaluating implementations of electronic health record systems, given the restricted number of early adopter sites available to us, we sought purposively to select a diverse range of implementation cases among those that were available[ 5 ]. We chose a mixture of teaching, non-teaching and Foundation Trust hospitals, and examples of each of the three electronic health record systems procured centrally by the NPfIT. At one recruited site, it quickly became apparent that access was problematic because of competing demands on that organisation. Recognising the importance of full access and co-operative working for generating rich data, the research team decided not to pursue work at that site and instead to focus on other recruited sites.

Collecting the data

In order to develop a thorough understanding of the case, the case study approach usually involves the collection of multiple sources of evidence, using a range of quantitative (e.g. questionnaires, audits and analysis of routinely collected healthcare data) and more commonly qualitative techniques (e.g. interviews, focus groups and observations). The use of multiple sources of data (data triangulation) has been advocated as a way of increasing the internal validity of a study (i.e. the extent to which the method is appropriate to answer the research question)[ 8 , 18 – 21 ]. An underlying assumption is that data collected in different ways should lead to similar conclusions, and approaching the same issue from different angles can help develop a holistic picture of the phenomenon (Table 2 )[ 4 ].

Brazier and colleagues used a mixed-methods case study approach to investigate the impact of a cancer care programme[ 22 ]. Here, quantitative measures were collected with questionnaires before, and five months after, the start of the intervention which did not yield any statistically significant results. Qualitative interviews with patients however helped provide an insight into potentially beneficial process-related aspects of the programme, such as greater, perceived patient involvement in care. The authors reported how this case study approach provided a number of contextual factors likely to influence the effectiveness of the intervention and which were not likely to have been obtained from quantitative methods alone.

In collective or multiple case studies, data collection needs to be flexible enough to allow a detailed description of each individual case to be developed (e.g. the nature of different cancer care programmes), before considering the emerging similarities and differences in cross-case comparisons (e.g. to explore why one programme is more effective than another). It is important that data sources from different cases are, where possible, broadly comparable for this purpose even though they may vary in nature and depth.

Analysing, interpreting and reporting case studies

Making sense and offering a coherent interpretation of the typically disparate sources of data (whether qualitative alone or together with quantitative) is far from straightforward. Repeated reviewing and sorting of the voluminous and detail-rich data are integral to the process of analysis. In collective case studies, it is helpful to analyse data relating to the individual component cases first, before making comparisons across cases. Attention needs to be paid to variations within each case and, where relevant, the relationship between different causes, effects and outcomes[ 23 ]. Data will need to be organised and coded to allow the key issues, both derived from the literature and emerging from the dataset, to be easily retrieved at a later stage. An initial coding frame can help capture these issues and can be applied systematically to the whole dataset with the aid of a qualitative data analysis software package.

The Framework approach is a practical approach, comprising of five stages (familiarisation; identifying a thematic framework; indexing; charting; mapping and interpretation) , to managing and analysing large datasets particularly if time is limited, as was the case in our study of recruitment of South Asians into asthma research (Table 1 )[ 3 , 24 ]. Theoretical frameworks may also play an important role in integrating different sources of data and examining emerging themes. For example, we drew on a socio-technical framework to help explain the connections between different elements - technology; people; and the organisational settings within which they worked - in our study of the introduction of electronic health record systems (Table 3 )[ 5 ]. Our study of patient safety in undergraduate curricula drew on an evaluation-based approach to design and analysis, which emphasised the importance of the academic, organisational and practice contexts through which students learn (Table 4 )[ 6 ].

Case study findings can have implications both for theory development and theory testing. They may establish, strengthen or weaken historical explanations of a case and, in certain circumstances, allow theoretical (as opposed to statistical) generalisation beyond the particular cases studied[ 12 ]. These theoretical lenses should not, however, constitute a strait-jacket and the cases should not be "forced to fit" the particular theoretical framework that is being employed.

When reporting findings, it is important to provide the reader with enough contextual information to understand the processes that were followed and how the conclusions were reached. In a collective case study, researchers may choose to present the findings from individual cases separately before amalgamating across cases. Care must be taken to ensure the anonymity of both case sites and individual participants (if agreed in advance) by allocating appropriate codes or withholding descriptors. In the example given in Table 3 , we decided against providing detailed information on the NHS sites and individual participants in order to avoid the risk of inadvertent disclosure of identities[ 5 , 25 ].

What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided?

The case study approach is, as with all research, not without its limitations. When investigating the formal and informal ways undergraduate students learn about patient safety (Table 4 ), for example, we rapidly accumulated a large quantity of data. The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted on the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources. This highlights a more general point of the importance of avoiding the temptation to collect as much data as possible; adequate time also needs to be set aside for data analysis and interpretation of what are often highly complex datasets.

Case study research has sometimes been criticised for lacking scientific rigour and providing little basis for generalisation (i.e. producing findings that may be transferable to other settings)[ 1 ]. There are several ways to address these concerns, including: the use of theoretical sampling (i.e. drawing on a particular conceptual framework); respondent validation (i.e. participants checking emerging findings and the researcher's interpretation, and providing an opinion as to whether they feel these are accurate); and transparency throughout the research process (see Table 8 )[ 8 , 18 – 21 , 23 , 26 ]. Transparency can be achieved by describing in detail the steps involved in case selection, data collection, the reasons for the particular methods chosen, and the researcher's background and level of involvement (i.e. being explicit about how the researcher has influenced data collection and interpretation). Seeking potential, alternative explanations, and being explicit about how interpretations and conclusions were reached, help readers to judge the trustworthiness of the case study report. Stake provides a critique checklist for a case study report (Table 9 )[ 8 ].

Conclusions

The case study approach allows, amongst other things, critical events, interventions, policy developments and programme-based service reforms to be studied in detail in a real-life context. It should therefore be considered when an experimental design is either inappropriate to answer the research questions posed or impossible to undertake. Considering the frequency with which implementations of innovations are now taking place in healthcare settings and how well the case study approach lends itself to in-depth, complex health service research, we believe this approach should be more widely considered by researchers. Though inherently challenging, the research case study can, if carefully conceptualised and thoughtfully undertaken and reported, yield powerful insights into many important aspects of health and healthcare delivery.

Yin RK: Case study research, design and method. 2009, London: Sage Publications Ltd., 4

Google Scholar  

Keen J, Packwood T: Qualitative research; case study evaluation. BMJ. 1995, 311: 444-446.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Sheikh A, Halani L, Bhopal R, Netuveli G, Partridge M, Car J, et al: Facilitating the Recruitment of Minority Ethnic People into Research: Qualitative Case Study of South Asians and Asthma. PLoS Med. 2009, 6 (10): 1-11.

Article   Google Scholar  

Pinnock H, Huby G, Powell A, Kielmann T, Price D, Williams S, et al: The process of planning, development and implementation of a General Practitioner with a Special Interest service in Primary Care Organisations in England and Wales: a comparative prospective case study. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO). 2008, [ http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/99-final-report.pdf ]

Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S, Cornford T, et al: Prospective evaluation of the implementation and adoption of NHS Connecting for Health's national electronic health record in secondary care in England: interim findings. BMJ. 2010, 41: c4564-

Pearson P, Steven A, Howe A, Sheikh A, Ashcroft D, Smith P, the Patient Safety Education Study Group: Learning about patient safety: organisational context and culture in the education of healthcare professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010, 15: 4-10. 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009052.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

van Harten WH, Casparie TF, Fisscher OA: The evaluation of the introduction of a quality management system: a process-oriented case study in a large rehabilitation hospital. Health Policy. 2002, 60 (1): 17-37. 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00187-7.

Stake RE: The art of case study research. 1995, London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Sheikh A, Smeeth L, Ashcroft R: Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application. Br J Gen Pract. 2002, 52 (482): 746-51.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

King G, Keohane R, Verba S: Designing Social Inquiry. 1996, Princeton: Princeton University Press

Doolin B: Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretative research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology. 1998, 13: 301-311. 10.1057/jit.1998.8.

George AL, Bennett A: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. 2005, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Eccles M, the Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG): Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science. 2006, 1: 1-8. 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1.

Article   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Netuveli G, Hurwitz B, Levy M, Fletcher M, Barnes G, Durham SR, Sheikh A: Ethnic variations in UK asthma frequency, morbidity, and health-service use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2005, 365 (9456): 312-7.

Sheikh A, Panesar SS, Lasserson T, Netuveli G: Recruitment of ethnic minorities to asthma studies. Thorax. 2004, 59 (7): 634-

CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Hellström I, Nolan M, Lundh U: 'We do things together': A case study of 'couplehood' in dementia. Dementia. 2005, 4: 7-22. 10.1177/1471301205049188.

Som CV: Nothing seems to have changed, nothing seems to be changing and perhaps nothing will change in the NHS: doctors' response to clinical governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2005, 18: 463-477. 10.1108/09513550510608903.

Lincoln Y, Guba E: Naturalistic inquiry. 1985, Newbury Park: Sage Publications

Barbour RS: Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ. 2001, 322: 1115-1117. 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.

Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000, 320: 50-52. 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.

Mason J: Qualitative researching. 2002, London: Sage

Brazier A, Cooke K, Moravan V: Using Mixed Methods for Evaluating an Integrative Approach to Cancer Care: A Case Study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2008, 7: 5-17. 10.1177/1534735407313395.

Miles MB, Huberman M: Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 1994, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 2

Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N: Analysing qualitative data. Qualitative research in health care. BMJ. 2000, 320: 114-116. 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.

Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A: Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010, 10 (1): 67-10.1186/1472-6947-10-67.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358: 483-488. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Yin R: Case study research: design and methods. 1994, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, 2

Yin R: Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999, 34: 1209-1224.

Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative methods for health research. 2009, Los Angeles: Sage, 2

Howcroft D, Trauth E: Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research, Theory and Application. 2005, Cheltenham, UK: Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar

Book   Google Scholar  

Blakie N: Approaches to Social Enquiry. 1993, Cambridge: Polity Press

Doolin B: Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Info Systems J. 2004, 14: 343-362. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00176.x.

Bloomfield BP, Best A: Management consultants: systems development, power and the translation of problems. Sociological Review. 1992, 40: 533-560.

Shanks G, Parr A: Positivist, single case study research in information systems: A critical analysis. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. 2003, Naples

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/100/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participants and colleagues who contributed to the individual case studies that we have drawn on. This work received no direct funding, but it has been informed by projects funded by Asthma UK, the NHS Service Delivery Organisation, NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme, and Patient Safety Research Portfolio. We would also like to thank the expert reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback. Our thanks are also due to Dr. Allison Worth who commented on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Division of Primary Care, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Sarah Crowe & Anthony Avery

Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Kathrin Cresswell, Ann Robertson & Aziz Sheikh

School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Crowe .

Additional information

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AS conceived this article. SC, KC and AR wrote this paper with GH, AA and AS all commenting on various drafts. SC and AS are guarantors.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A. et al. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 11 , 100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Download citation

Received : 29 November 2010

Accepted : 27 June 2011

Published : 27 June 2011

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Case Study Approach
• Electronic Health Record System
• Case Study Design
• Case Study Site
• Case Study Report

BMC Medical Research Methodology

ISSN: 1471-2288

• General enquiries: [email protected]

The Case Study as Research Method: A Practical Handbook

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

ISSN : 1176-6093

Article publication date: 21 June 2011

Scapens, R.W. (2011), "The Case Study as Research Method: A Practical Handbook", Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management , Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111137582

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

This book aims to provide case‐study researchers with a step‐by‐step practical guide to “help them conduct the study with the required degree of rigour” (p. xi).

It seeks to “demonstrate that the case study is indeed a scientific method” (p. 104) and to show “the usefulness of the case method as one tool in the researcher's methodological arsenal” (p. 105). The individual chapters cover the various stages in conducting case‐study research, and each chapter sets out a number of practical steps which have to be taken by the researcher. The following are the eight stages/chapters and, in brackets, the number of steps in each stages:

Assessing appropriateness and usefulness (4).

Ensuring accuracy of results (21).

Preparation (6).

Selecting cases (4).

Collecting data (7).

Analyzing data (4).

Interpreting data (3).

Reporting results (4).

It is particularly noticeable that ensuring accuracy of results has by far the largest number of number of steps – 21 steps compared to seven or fewer steps in the other stages. This reflects Gagnon's concern to demonstrate the scientific rigour of case‐study research. In the forward, he explains that the book draws on his experience in conducting his own PhD research, which was closely supervised by three professors, one of whom was inclined towards quantitative research. Consequently, his research was underpinned by the principles and philosophy of quantitative research. This is clearly reflected in the approach taken in this book, which seeks to show that case‐study research is just as rigorous and scientific as quantitative research, and it can produce an objective and accurate representation of the observed reality.

There is no discussion of the methodological issues relating to the use of case‐study research methods. This is acknowledged in the forward, although Gagnon refers to them as philosophical or epistemological issues (p. xii), as he tends to use the terms methodology and method interchangeably – as is common in quantitative research. Although he starts (step 1.1) by trying to distance case and other qualitative research from the work of positivists, arguing that society is socially constructed, he nevertheless sees social reality as objective and independent of the researcher. So for Gagnon, the aim of case research is to accurately reflect that reality. At various points in the book the notion of interpretation is used – evidence is interpreted and the (objective) case findings have to be interpreted.

So although there is a distancing from positivist research (p. 1), the approach taken in this book retains an objective view of the social reality which is being researched; a view which is rather different to the subjective view of reality taken by many interpretive case researchers. This distinction between an objective and a subjective view of the social reality being researched – and especially its use in contrasting positivist and interpretive research – has its origins the taxonomy of Burrell and Morgan (1979) . Although there have been various developments in the so‐called “objective‐subjective debate”, and recently some discussion in relation to management accounting research ( Kakkuri‐Knuuttila et al. , 2008 ; Ahrens, 2008 ), this debate is not mentioned in the book. Nevertheless, it is clear that Gagnon is firmly in the objective camp. In a recent paper, Johnson et al. (2006, p. 138) provide a more contemporary classification of the different types of qualitative research. In their terms, the approach taken in this book could be described as neo‐empiricist – an approach which they characterise as “qualitative positivists”.

The approach taken in this handbook leaves case studies open to the criticisms that they are a small sample, and consequently difficult to generalise, and to arguments that case studies are most appropriate for exploratory research which can subsequently be generalised though quantitative research. Gagnon explains that this was the approach he used after completing his thesis (p. xi). The handbook only seems to recognise two types of case studies, namely exploratory and raw empirical case studies – the latter being used where “the researcher is interested in a subject without having formed any preconceived ideas about it” (p. 15) – which has echoes of Glaser and Strauss (1967) . However, limiting case studies to these two types ignores other potential types; in particular, explanatory case studies which are where interpretive case‐study research can make important contributions ( Ryan et al. , 2002 ).

This limited approach to case studies comes through in the practical steps which are recommended in the handbook, and especially in the discussion of reliability and validity. The suggested steps seem to be designed to keep very close to the notions of reliability and validity used in quantitative research. There is no mention of the recent discussion of “validity” in interpretive accounting research, which emphasises the importance of authenticity and credibility and their implications for writing up qualitative and case‐study research ( Lukka and Modell, 2010 ). Although the final stage of Gagnon's handbook makes some very general comments about reporting the results, it does not mention, for example, Baxter and Chua's (2008) paper in QRAM which discusses the importance of demonstrating authenticity, credibility and transferability in writing qualitative research.

Despite Gagnon's emphasis on traditional notions of reliability and validity the handbook provides some useful practical advice for all case‐study researchers. For example, case‐study research needs a very good research design; case‐study researchers must work hard to gain access to and acceptance in the research settings; a clear strategy is needed for data collection; the case researcher should create field notes (in a field notebook, or otherwise) to record all the thoughts, ideas, observations, etc. that would not otherwise be collected; and the vast amount of data that case‐study research can generate needs to be carefully managed. Furthermore, because of what Gagnon calls the “risk of mortality” (p. 54) (i.e. the risk that access to a research site may be lost – for instance, if the organisation goes bankrupt) it is crucial for some additional site(s) to be selected at the outset to ensure that the planned research can be completed. This is what I call “insurance cases” when talking to my own PhD students. Interestingly, Gagnon recognises the ethical issues involved in doing case studies – something which is not always mentioned by the more objectivist type of case‐study researchers. He emphasises that it is crucial to honour confidentiality agreements, to ensure data are stored securely and that commitments are met and promises kept.

There is an interesting discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of using computer methods in analysing data (in stage 6). However, the discussion of coding appears to be heavily influenced by grounded theory, and is clearly concerned with producing an accurate reflection of an objective reality. In addition, Gagnon's depiction of case analysis is overly focussed on content analysis – possibly because it is a quantitative type of technique. There is no reference to the other approaches available to qualitative researchers. For example, there is no mention of the various visualisation techniques set out in Miles and Huberman (1994) .

To summarise, Gagnon's book is particularly useful for case‐study researchers who see the reality they are researching as objective and researcher independent. However, this is a sub‐set of case‐study researchers. Although some of the practical guidance offered is relevant for other types of case‐study researchers, those who see multiple realities in the social actors and/or recognise the subjectivity of the research process might have difficulty with some of the steps in this handbook. Gagnon's aim to show that the case study is a scientific method, gives the handbook a focus on traditional (quantitatively inspired) notions rigour and validity, and a tendency to ignore (or at least marginalise) other types of case study research. For example, the focus on exploratory cases, which need to be supplemented by broad based quantitative research, overlooks the real potential of case study research which lies in explanatory cases. Furthermore, Gagnon is rather worried about participant research, as the researcher may play a role which is “not consistent with scientific method” (p. 42), and which may introduce researcher bias and thereby damage “the impartiality of the study” (p. 53). Leaving aside the philosophical question about whether any social science research, including quantitative research, can be impartial, this stance could severely limit the potential of case‐study research and it would rule out both the early work on the sociology of mass production and the recent calls for interventionist research. Clearly, there could be a problem where a researcher is trying to sell consulting services, but there is a long tradition of social researchers working within organisations that they are studying. Furthermore, if interpretive research is to be relevant for practice, researchers may have to work with organisations to introduce new ideas and new ways of analysing problems. Gagnon would seem to want to avoid all such research – as it would not be “impartial”.

Consequently, although there is some good practical advice for case study researchers in this handbook, some of the recommendations have to be treated cautiously, as it is a book which sees case‐study research in a very specific way. As mentioned earlier, in the Forward Gagnon explicitly recognises that the book does not take a position on the methodological debates surrounding the use of case studies as a research method, and he says that “The reader should therefore use and judge this handbook with these considerations in mind” (p. xii). This is very good advice – caveat emptor .

Ahrens , T. ( 2008 ), “ A comment on Marja‐Liisa Kakkuri‐Knuuttila ”, Accounting, Organizations and Society , Vol. 33 Nos 2/3 , pp. 291 ‐ 7 , Kari Lukka and Jaakko Kuorikoski.

Baxter , J. and Chua , W.F. ( 2008 ), “ The field researcher as author‐writer ”, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management , Vol. 5 No. 2 , pp. 101 ‐ 21 .

Burrell , G. and Morgan , G. ( 1979 ), Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis , Heinneman , London .

Glaser , B.G. and Strauss , A.L. ( 1967 ), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , Aldine , New York, NY .

Johnson , P. , Buehring , A. , Cassell , C. and Symon , G. ( 2006 ), “ Evaluating qualitative management research: towards a contingent critieriology ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 8 No. 3 , pp. 131 ‐ 56 .

Kakkuri‐Knuuttila , M.‐L. , Lukka , K. and Kuorikoski , J. ( 2008 ), “ Straddling between paradigms: a naturalistic philosophical case study on interpretive research in management accounting ”, Accounting, Organizations and Society , Vol. 33 Nos 2/3 , pp. 267 ‐ 91 .

Lukka , K. and Modell , S. ( 2010 ), “ Validation in interpretive management accounting research ”, Accounting, Organizations and Society , Vol. 35 , pp. 462 ‐ 77 .

Miles , M.B. and Huberman , A.M. ( 1994 ), Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods , 2nd ed. , Sage , London .

Ryan , R.J. , Scapens , R.W. and Theobald , M. ( 2002 ), Research Methods and Methodology in Finance and Accounting , 2nd ed. , Thomson Learning , London .

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

Beamforming Techniques for MIMO-NOMA for 5G and Beyond 5G: Research Gaps and Future Directions

• Published: 02 November 2023
• Volume 43 , pages 1518–1548, ( 2024 )

Cite this article

• Sadiq Ur Rehman 1 ,
• Jawwad Ahmad   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7138-6452 2 ,
• Anwaar Manzar 1 &
• Muhammad Moinuddin 3 , 4  

235 Accesses

2 Citations

Explore all metrics

Effective sharing of the communication channel among many users, or multiple access (MA) techniques, can play a vital role in meeting the diverse demands of low latency, high reliability, massive connectivity, better fairness, and high throughput. In this context, non-orthogonal multiple access with multiple antennas, also known as multiple-input, multiple-output NOMA (MIMO-NOMA), is a promising enabling technology for fifth-generation (5G) and beyond (5G) wireless networks. The proper design of beamforming systems is one of the major difficulties in developing MIMO-NOMA. There are various ways to design beamforming for MIMO-NOMA in the literature. However, there is not much work dedicated to the survey focusing only on beamforming design in MIMO-NOMA systems. This work presents a comprehensive overview of beamforming methods in MIMO-NOMA for 5G and B5G. These strategies are classified in detail and have varied attributes, benefits, and drawbacks. As a result, future research gaps are also highlighted. Moreover, a simulation study is presented as a case study on the impact of random beamforming in various scenarios of heterogeneous environments with small and macro-cells. For this purpose, users’ outage probability is simulated with various types of interference in the heterogeneous systems, including inter-cluster, cross-tier, and co-tier interferences. This analysis also helps to contrast the performance of small and macro-cells. Finally, future research directions are discussed for beamforming in MIMO-NOMA for 5G and B5G.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Application of cell-free massive MIMO in 5G and beyond 5G wireless networks: a survey

Joint power optimization and scaled beamforming approach in B5G network based massive MIMO enabled HetNet with full-duplex small cells

CMBF-based dynamic selection for heterogeneous massive MIMO systems

Availability of data and materials.

There are no data associated with this manuscript.

A. Ahmed, Z. Elsaraf, F.A. Khan, Q.Z. Ahmed, Cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access for beyond 5G networks. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2 , 990–999 (2021)

Article   Google Scholar  

W.A. Al-Hussaibi, F.H. Ali, Efficient user clustering, receive antenna selection, and power allocation algorithms for massive MIMO-NOMA systems. IEEE Access 7 , 31865–31882 (2019)

H.M. Al-Obiedollah, K. Cumanan, J. Thiyagalingam, A.G. Burr, Z. Ding, O.A. Dobre, Energy efficient beamforming design for miso non-orthogonal multiple access systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 67 (6), 4117–4131 (2019)

H.M. Al-Obiedollah, K. Cumanan, J. Thiyagalingam, J. Tang, A.G. Burr, Z. Ding, O.A. Dobre, Spectral-energy efficiency trade-off-based beamforming design for miso non-orthogonal multiple access systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 19 (10), 6593–6606 (2020)

M.S. Ali, E. Hossain, A. Al-Dweik, D.I. Kim, Downlink power allocation for COMP-NOMA in multi-cell networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 66 (9), 3982–3998 (2018)

S. Ali, E. Hossain, D.I. Kim, Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) for downlink multiuser MIMO systems: user clustering, beamforming, and power allocation. IEEE Access 5 , 565–577 (2016)

S.H. Amin, A.H. Mehana, S.S. Soliman, Y.A. Fahmy, Power allocation for maximum MIMO-NOMA system user-rate, in 2018 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 1–6

A. Araghi, M. Khalily, M. Safaei, A. Bagheri, V. Singh, F. Wang, R. Tafazolli, Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) in the sub-6 GHz band: design, implementation, and real-world demonstration. IEEE Access 10 , 2646–2655 (2022)

K. Aswini, M. Surendar, Capacity analysis of intelligent reflecting surface assisted RSMA system with perfect and imperfect CSI for 6G. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2466 , 012001 (2023)

F.A. Azhiri, B.M. Tazehkand, R. Abdolee, A novel EO-based optimum random beamforming method in mmWave-NOMA systems with sparse antenna array. Digit. Commun. Netw. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2023.02.010

V.L. Babu, L. Mathews, S.S. Pillai, Performance analysis of linear and nonlinear precoding in MIMO systems. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 4 (6), 373–376 (2015)

Google Scholar  

İ Baştürk, Evaluation of energy-efficiency problem in orthogonal frequency division multiple access cellular networks. Celal Bayar Univ. J. Sci. 15 (1), 9–15 (2019)

MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Y. Bo, J. Fonseka, Throughput enhancement on the downlink of 4G and 5G systems: NOMA, BOMA and IBOMA. Int. J. Sens. Wirel. Commun. Control 8 (1), 57–64 (2018)

R.M. Buehrer, Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) (Springer, Berlin, 2022)

B.P. Chaudhary, R. Shankar, R.K. Mishra, A tutorial on cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access networks. J. Defense Model. Simul. 19 (4), 563–573 (2022)

C. Chen, W. Cai, X. Cheng, L. Yang, Y. Jin, Low complexity beamforming and user selection schemes for 5G MIMO-NOMA systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 35 (12), 2708–2722 (2017)

X. Chen, D.W.K. Ng, W. Yu, E.G. Larsson, N. Al-Dhahir, R. Schober, Massive access for 5G and beyond. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 39 (3), 615–637 (2020)

Y. Cheng, K.H. Li, Y. Liu, K.C. Teh, H.V. Poor, Downlink and uplink intelligent reflecting surface aided networks: NOMA and OMA. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 20 (6), 3988–4000 (2021)

S. Chinnadurai, P. Selvaprabhu, Y. Jeong, X. Jiang, M.H. Lee, Worst-case energy efficiency maximization in a 5G massive MIMO-NOMA system. Sensors 17 (9), 2139 (2017)

Article   ADS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

S. Chinnadurai, P. Selvaprabhu, Y. Jeong, A.L. Sarker, H. Hai, W. Duan, M.H. Lee, User clustering and robust beamforming design in multicell MIMO-NOMA system for 5G communications. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 78 , 181–191 (2017)

S. Chinnadurai, P. Selvaprabhu, M.H. Lee, A novel joint user pairing and dynamic power allocation scheme in MIMO-NOMA system, in 2017 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 951–953

K.H. Chung, On improved outage probability of correlated superposition coding/non-SIC NOMA. J. Korea Inst. Electron. Commun. Sci. 16 (4), 611–616 (2021)

J. Cui, Z. Ding, P. Fan, Power minimization strategies in downlink MIMO-NOMA systems, in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 1–6

X. Dai, Z. Zhang, B. Bai, S. Chen, S. Sun, Pattern division multiple access: a new multiple access technology for 5G. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 25 (2), 54–60 (2018)

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

O. Elijah, S.K.A. Rahim, W.K. New, C.Y. Leow, K. Cumanan, T.K. Geok, Intelligent massive MIMO systems for beyond 5G networks: an overview and future trends. IEEE Access 10 , 102532 (2022)

N. Estrada Brito, C. Morales Alarcón, Non-orthogonal multiple access technique performance in a long-term evolution mobile communication system. Revista Digital Novasinergia 3 (1), 62–76 (2020)

J.L. Frauendorf, É. Almeida de Souza: Aas—advanced antenna system: the MIMO, massive MIMO, and beamforming antennas, in The Architectural and Technological Revolution of 5G (Springer, 2022), pp. 69–81

M. Ghous, A.K. Hassan, Z.H. Abbas, G. Abbas, A. Hussien, T. Baker, Cooperative power-domain NOMA systems: an overview. Sensors 22 (24), 9652 (2022)

L.C. Godara, Applications of antenna arrays to mobile communications. I. Performance improvement, feasibility, and system considerations. Proc. IEEE 85 (7), 1031–1060 (1997)

K. Higuchi, Y. Kishiyama, Non-orthogonal access with random beamforming and intra-beam SIC for cellular MIMO downlink, in 2013 IEEE 78th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall) (IEEE, 2013), pp. 1–5

R. Hoshyar, R. Razavi, M. Al-Imari, LDS-OFDM an efficient multiple access technique, in 2010 IEEE 71st Vehicular Technology Conference (IEEE, 2010), pp. 1–5

Y. Hu, L. Ping, Interleave division multiple access (IDMA), in Multiple Access Techniques for 5G Wireless Networks and Beyond (2019), pp. 417–449

H. Huang, Y. Shi, L. Liang, J. He, X. Zhang, Performance analysis of overlay cognitive NOMA network with imperfect SIC and imperfect CSI. Phys. Commun. 53 , 101711 (2022)

S.R. Islam, M. Zeng, O.A. Dobre, K.S. Kwak, Resource allocation for downlink NOMA systems: key techniques and open issues. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 25 (2), 40–47 (2018)

N. Iswarya, L. Jayashree, A survey on successive interference cancellation schemes in non-orthogonal multiple access for future radio access. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 120 (2), 1057–1078 (2021)

Joe: NOMA vs OMA—capacity comparison (2020). https://ecewireless.blogspot.com/2020/09/noma-vs-oma-capacity-comparison.html . Accessed 15 Jul 2023

V. Jungnickel, K. Manolakis, W. Zirwas, B. Panzner, V. Braun, M. Lossow, M. Sternad, R. Apelfröjd, T. Svensson, The role of small cells, coordinated multipoint, and massive MIMO in 5G. IEEE Commun. Mag. 52 (5), 44–51 (2014)

M. Kaliszan, E. Pollakis, S. Stańczak, Multigroup multicast with application-layer coding: Beamforming for maximum weighted sum rate, in 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (IEEE, 2012), pp. 2270–2275

P.R. Kapula, P. Sridevi, Channel estimation in 5G multi input multi output wireless communication using optimized deep neural framework. Clust. Comput. 25 (5), 3517–3530 (2022)

F. Kara, H. Kaya, BER performances of downlink and uplink NOMA in the presence of SIC errors over fading channels. IET Commun. 12 (15), 1834–1844 (2018)

B.A. Karim, H.K. Ali, A novel beamforming technique using mmWave antenna arrays for 5G wireless communication networks. Digit. Signal Process. 134 , 103917 (2023)

R. Kataoka, I. Kanno, T. Hayashi, N. Tsumachi, T. Suzuki, H. Ishikawa, K. Yamazaki, Y. Kishi, Outdoor experimental evaluation of asynchronous successive interference cancellation for 5G in shared spectrum with different radio systems. IEICE Commun. Express 10 (8), 587–592 (2021)

W.U. Khan, M.A. Jamshed, E. Lagunas, S. Chatzinotas, X. Li, B. Ottersten, Energy efficiency optimization for backscatter enhanced NOMA cooperative V2X communications under imperfect CSI. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. (2022)

B. Kimy, S. Lim, H. Kim, S. Suh, J. Kwun, S. Choi, C. Lee, S. Lee, D. Hong, Non-orthogonal multiple access in a downlink multiuser beamforming system, in MILCOM 2013-2013 IEEE Military Communications Conference (IEEE, 2013), pp. 1278–1283

A. Koohang, C.S. Sargent, J.H. Nord, J. Paliszkiewicz, Internet of things (IoT): from awareness to continued use. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 62 , 102442 (2022)

K. Lakshmanna, R. Kaluri, N. Gundluru, Z.S. Alzamil, D.S. Rajput, A.A. Khan, M.A. Haq, A. Alhussen, A review on deep learning techniques for IoT data. Electronics 11 (10), 1604 (2022)

Q.N. Le, V.D. Nguyen, O.A. Dobre, N.P. Nguyen, R. Zhao, S. Chatzinotas, Learning-assisted user clustering in cell-free massive MIMO-NOMA networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 70 (12), 12872–12887 (2021)

B.K.S. Lima, A.S. De Sena, R. Dinis, D.B. Da Costa, M. Beko, R. Oliveira, M. Debbah, Aerial intelligent reflecting surfaces in MIMO-NOMA networks: fundamentals, potential achievements, and challenges. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 3 , 1007–1024 (2022)

S. Liu, C. Zhang, Non-orthogonal multiple access in a downlink multiuser beamforming system with limited CSI feedback. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2016 (1), 1–11 (2016)

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Y. Liu, S. Zhang, X. Mu, Z. Ding, R. Schober, N. Al-Dhahir, E. Hossain, X. Shen, Evolution of NOMA toward next generation multiple access (NGMA) for 6G. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 40 (4), 1037–1071 (2022)

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Z. Liu, P. Xiao, Z. Mheich, Power-imbalanced low-density signatures (LDS) from Eisenstein numbers, in 2019 IEEE VTS Asia Pacific Wireless Communications Symposium (APWCS) (IEEE, 2019), pp. 1–5

Z. Liu, L.L. Yang, Sparse or dense: a comparative study of code-domain NOMA systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 20 (8), 4768–4780 (2021)

D. López-Pérez, A. De Domenico, N. Piovesan, G. Xinli, H. Bao, S. Qitao, M. Debbah, A survey on 5G radio access network energy efficiency: massive MIMO, lean carrier design, sleep modes, and machine learning. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 24 (1), 653–697 (2022)

B. Lu, S. Lin, J. Shi, TDMA-NOMA based computation offloading for cognitive capacity harvesting networks with transmission order optimization. IEEE Trans. Commun. 70 (9), 6355–6369 (2022)

Y. Lu, Y. Qu, C. Yang, T. Li, X. Wang, H. Bian, H. Zhu, A user matching and power allocation scheme for downlink MIMO-NOMA communication system. Phys. Commun. 42 , 101174 (2020)

M.R. Mahmood, M.A. Matin, P. Sarigiannidis, S.K. Goudos, G.K. Karagiannidis, Residual compensation-based extreme learning machine for MIMO-NOMA receiver. IEEE Access 11 , 13398–13407 (2023)

M. Mhedhbi, F.E. Boukour, Analysis and evaluation of pattern division multiple access scheme jointed with 5G waveforms. IEEE Access 7 , 21826–21833 (2019)

A. Misra, U.R. Kalita, K.K. Sarma, Performance analysis of multi user MIMO NOMA network with hierarchical clustering. Int. J. Electron. Lett. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/21681724.2022.2129810

P. Mursia, I. Atzeni, D. Gesbert, L. Cottatellucci, Covariance shaping for massive MIMO systems, in 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 1–6

H.G. Myung, J. Lim, D.J. Goodman, Single carrier FDMA for uplink wireless transmission. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 1 (3), 30–38 (2006)

G. Naik, J.M. Park, J. Ashdown, W. Lehr, Next generation Wi-Fi and 5G NR-U in the 6 GHz bands: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Access 8 , 153027–153056 (2020)

A. Nasser, O. Muta, M. Elsabrouty, H. Gacanin, Interference mitigation and power allocation scheme for downlink MIMO-NOMA HetNet. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 68 (7), 6805–6816 (2019)

S. Norouzi, B. Champagne, Y. Cai, Joint optimization framework for user clustering, downlink beamforming, and power allocation in MIMO NOMA systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 71 (1), 214–228 (2022)

H. Pan, S.C. Liew, Information update: TDMA or FDMA? IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 9 (6), 856–860 (2020)

P. Pirinen, A brief overview of 5G research activities, in 1st International Conference on 5G for Ubiquitous Connectivity (IEEE, 2014), pp. 17–22

B.U. Rehman, M.I. Babar, G.A. Azim, M. Amir, H. Alhumyani, M.S. Alzaidi, M. Alshammari, R. Saeed, Uplink power control scheme for spectral efficiency maximization in NOMA systems. Alex. Eng. J. 64 , 667–677 (2023)

S.U. Rehman, J. Ahmad, A. Manzar, M. Moinuddin, Outage probability and ergodic capacity analysis of MIMO-NOMA heterogeneous network for 5G system. J. Indep. Stud. Res. Comput. 20 (2), 15–23 (2022)

S.U. Rehman, A. Hussain, F. Hussain, M.A. Mannan, A comprehensive study: 5G wireless networks and emerging technologies. Int. Electr. Eng. Conf. (IEEC) 5 , 25–32 (2020)

S.U. Rehman, H. Mustafa, A.R. Larik, IoT based substation monitoring & control system using Arduino with data logging, in 2021 4th International Conference on Computing & Information Sciences (ICCIS) (IEEE, 2021), pp. 1–6

S.U.R. Aqeel-ur Rehman, I.U. Khan, M. Moiz, S. Hasan, Security and privacy issues in IoT. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Inf. Secur. (IJCNIS) 8 (3), 147–157 (2016)

F. Rinaldi, A. Raschella, S. Pizzi, 5G NR system design: a concise survey of key features and capabilities. Wirel. Netw. 27 , 5173–5188 (2021)

S.K. Sa, A.K. Mishra, An uplink cooperative NOMA based on CDRT with hardware impairments and imperfect CSI. IEEE Syst. J. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2023.3275469

Y. Saito, Y. Kishiyama, A. Benjebbour, T. Nakamura, A. Li, K. Higuchi, Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) for cellular future radio access, in 2013 IEEE 77th vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring) (IEEE, 2013), pp. 1–5

M. Sakai, K. Kamohara, H. Iura, H. Nishimoto, K. Ishioka, Y. Murata, M. Yamamoto, A. Okazaki, N. Nonaka, S. Suyama et al., Experimental field trials on MU-MIMO transmissions for high SHF wide-band massive MIMO in 5G. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 19 (4), 2196–2207 (2020)

T. Sanjana, M. Suma, Deep learning approaches used in downlink MIMO-NOMA system: a survey, in Soft Computing and Signal Processing: Proceedings of 3rd ICSCSP 2020 , vol. 1 (Springer, 2021), pp. 687–704

A. Sarin, A.T. Avestruz, A framework for code division multiple access wireless power transfer. IEEE Access 9 , 135079–135101 (2021)

M.A. Shaikh, A. Manzar, M. Moinuddin, S.U. Rehman, H. Mustafa, Semi-blind beamforming in beam space MIMO NOMA for mmWave communications. IEEE Access 10 , 120426–120435 (2022)

L. Shan, S. Gao, S. Chen, M. Xu, F. Zhang, X. Bao, M. Chen, Energy-efficient resource allocation in NOMA-integrated V2X networks. Comput. Commun. 197 , 23–33 (2023)

W. Shao, S. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Ma, N. Zhao, Suppressing interference and power allocation over the multi-cell MIMO-NOMA networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 23 (8), 1397–1400 (2019)

A. Sharma, R.K. Jha, A comprehensive survey on security issues in 5G wireless communication network using beamforming approach. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 119 (4), 3447–3501 (2021)

H. Sharma, N. Kumar, R. Tekchandani, Physical layer security using beamforming techniques for 5G and beyond networks: a systematic review. Phys. Commun. 54 , 101791 (2022)

P.K. Sharma, D. Sharma, E.K. Kumari, T.S. Rao, Performance analysis of non-orthogonal multiple access over orthogonal multiple access, in Wireless Communication with Artificial Intelligence (CRC Press), pp. 273–293

M. Shehab, T. Khattab, M. Kucukvar, D. Trinchero, The role of 5g/6g networks in building sustainable and energy-efficient smart cities, in 2022 IEEE 7th International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 1–7

R. Shen, X. Wang, Y. Xu, Beamforming design for uplink multi-cell MIMO-NOMA systems, in 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) (IEEE, 2019), pp. 2039–2043

Z. Shi, H. Wang, Y. Fu, G. Yang, S. Ma, F. Hou, T.A. Tsiftsis, Zero-forcing-based downlink virtual MIMO-NOMA communications in IoT networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 7 (4), 2716–2737 (2019)

W. Shin, M. Vaezi, B. Lee, D.J. Love, J. Lee, H.V. Poor, Coordinated beamforming for multi-cell MIMO-NOMA. IEEE Commun. Lett. 21 (1), 84–87 (2016)

W. Shin, M. Vaezi, B. Lee, D.J. Love, J. Lee, H.V. Poor, Non-orthogonal multiple access in multi-cell networks: theory, performance, and practical challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55 (10), 176–183 (2017)

Y. Shobha, H. Rangaraju, Design of novel approach for emerging power-domain superposition coding (SC)-using hybrid NOMA-OFDM for 5G communications. Int. J. Intell. Unmanned Syst. (ahead-of-print) (2021)

Z. Si, H. Wan, T. Qin, Z. Wang, RIS-aided cell-free MIMO system: perfect and imperfect CSI design for energy efficiency. IEICE Trans. Commun. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1587/transcom.2022EBP3173

N.D. Sidiropoulos, T.N. Davidson, Z.Q. Luo, Transmit beamforming for physical-layer multicasting. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 54 (6), 2239–2251 (2006)

G. Singh, A. Srivastava, V.A. Bohara, Z. Liu, Downlink performance of optical power domain NOMA for beyond 5G enabled V2X networks. IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol. 2 , 235–248 (2021)

S. Solanki, J. Park, I. Lee, On the performance of IRS-aided UAV networks with NOMA. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 71 (8), 9038–9043 (2022)

A.B. Tambawal, R.M. Noor, R. Salleh, C. Chembe, M.H. Anisi, O. Michael, J. Lloret, Time division multiple access scheduling strategies for emerging vehicular ad hoc network medium access control protocols: a survey. Telecommun. Syst. 70 , 595–616 (2019)

M. Tian, Q. Zhang, S. Zhao, Q. Li, J. Qin, Robust beamforming in downlink MIMO NOMA networks using cutting-set method. IEEE Commun. Lett. 22 (3), 574–577 (2017)

H. Tran, V.H. Dang, D. Niyato, D.N. Cuong, N.C. Luong, C. So-In et al., Outage probability minimization in secure NOMA cognitive radio systems with UAV relay: a machine learning approach. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 9 (2), 435–451 (2022)

A. Tusha, S. Doğan, H. Arslan, A hybrid downlink NOMA with OFDM and OFDM-IM for beyond 5G wireless networks. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 27 , 491–495 (2020)

B. Wang, L. Dai, Z. Wang, N. Ge, S. Zhou, Spectrum and energy-efficient beamspace MIMO-NOMA for millimeter-wave communications using lens antenna array. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 35 (10), 2370–2382 (2017)

C.L. Wang, T.H. Liou, Improved modulation schemes for lattice-partition-based downlink non-orthogonal multiple access systems. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 9 (12), 2130–2134 (2020)

Q. Wang, T. Li, R. Feng, C. Yang, An efficient large resource-user scale SCMA codebook design method. IEEE Commun. Lett. 23 (10), 1787–1790 (2019)

F. Wei, W. Chen, Low complexity iterative receiver design for sparse code multiple access. IEEE Trans. Commun. 65 (2), 621–634 (2016)

C. Windpassinger, R.F. Fischer, T. Vencel, J.B. Huber, Precoding in multiantenna and multiuser communications. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 3 (4), 1305–1316 (2004)

Y. Wu, L.P. Qian, Energy-efficient NOMA-enabled traffic offloading via dual-connectivity in small-cell networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 21 (7), 1605–1608 (2017)

Y. Wu, Y. Song, T. Wang, L. Qian, T.Q. Quek, Non-orthogonal multiple access assisted federated learning via wireless power transfer: a cost-efficient approach. IEEE Trans. Commun. 70 (4), 2853–2869 (2022)

K. Xiao, S. Dai, H. Rutagemwa, B. Rong, L. Gong, M. Kadoch, A novel opportunistic NOMA scheme for 5G massive MIMO multicast communications, in 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 1–5

Z. Xiao, Z. Han, A. Nallanathan, O.A. Dobre, B. Clerckx, J. Choi, C. He, W. Tong, Antenna array enabled space/air/ground communications and networking for 6G. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 40 (10), 2773–2804 (2022)

Z. Xie, W. Yi, X. Wu, Y. Liu, A. Nallanathan, Modeling and coverage analysis for RIS-aided NOMA transmissions in heterogeneous networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.13182 (2021)

L. Yang, Y. Liu, Y. Siu, Low complexity message passing algorithm for SCMA system. IEEE Commun. Lett. 20 (12), 2466–2469 (2016)

X. Yue, Y. Liu, Performance analysis of intelligent reflecting surface assisted NOMA networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 21 (4), 2623–2636 (2021)

X. Yue, Z. Qin, Y. Liu, S. Kang, Y. Chen, A unified framework for non-orthogonal multiple access. IEEE Trans. Commun. 66 (11), 5346–5359 (2018)

C.H. Yuen, P. Amini, B. Farhang-Boroujeny, Single carrier frequency division multiple access (SC-FDMA) for filter bank multicarrier communication systems, in 2010 Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (IEEE, 2010), pp. 1–5

M. Zeeshan, K. Shahzad, M.U. Farooq, Noma-enabled cognitive communication based on hybrid narrowband/wideband SDR waveform, in 2022 3rd International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (IISEC) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 1–6

M. Zeng, N.P. Nguyen, O.A. Dobre, H.V. Poor, Securing downlink massive MIMO-NOMA networks with artificial noise. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 13 (3), 685–699 (2019)

M. Zeng, A. Yadav, O.A. Dobre, G.I. Tsiropoulos, H.V. Poor, Capacity comparison between MIMO-NOMA and MIMO-OMA with multiple users in a cluster. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 35 (10), 2413–2424 (2017)

Q. Zhang, Q. Li, J. Qin, Robust beamforming for nonorthogonal multiple-access systems in miso channels. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 65 (12), 10231–10236 (2016)

S. Zhang, Z. Yang, M. Chen, D. Liu, K.K. Wong, H.V. Poor, Beamforming design for the performance optimization of intelligent reflecting surface assisted multicast MIMO networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07048 (2022)

Y. Zhang, K. Peng, X. Wang, J. Song, Performance analysis and code optimization of IDMA with 5G new radio LDPC code. IEEE Commun. Lett. 22 (8), 1552–1555 (2018)

Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Y. Li, Design and analysis of a multi-input multi-output system for high power based on improved magnetic coupling structure. Energies 15 (5), 1684 (2022)

Z. Zhang, H. Sun, R.Q. Hu, Downlink and uplink non-orthogonal multiple access in a dense wireless network. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 35 (12), 2771–2784 (2017)

J. Zhao, Y. Liu, K.K. Chai, A. Nallanathan, Y. Chen, Z. Han, Spectrum allocation and power control for non-orthogonal multiple access in HetNets. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 16 (9), 5825–5837 (2017)

Z. Zhao, W. Chen, An adaptive switching method for sum rate maximization in downlink MISO-NOMA systems, in GLOBECOM 2017-2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference (IEEE, 2017), pp. 1–6

B. Zheng, Q. Wu, R. Zhang, Intelligent reflecting surface-assisted multiple access with user pairing: NOMA or OMA? IEEE Commun. Lett. 24 (4), 753–757 (2020)

X. Zou, B. He, H. Jafarkhani, An analysis of two-user uplink asynchronous non-orthogonal multiple access systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 18 (2), 1404–1418 (2019)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, has funded this project, under Grant No. (KEP-MSc: 63-135-1443).

The Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, has funded this project, under grant no. (KEP-MSc: 63-135-1443).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Hamdard University, Sharae Madinat Al-Hikmah, Karachi, 74600, Pakistan

Sadiq Ur Rehman & Anwaar Manzar

Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Usman Institute of Technology University (UITU), ST-13, Block-7, Gushan-e-Iqbal, Abu-Hasan Isphahani Road, Karachi, 75300, Pakistan

Jawwad Ahmad

Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Muhammad Moinuddin

Center of Excellence in Intelligent Engineering Systems (CEIES), King Abdulaziz University, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jawwad Ahmad .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

Authors do not have any conflict of interest for the submitted work.

Code Availability

Code can be made available on request.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Rehman, S.U., Ahmad, J., Manzar, A. et al. Beamforming Techniques for MIMO-NOMA for 5G and Beyond 5G: Research Gaps and Future Directions. Circuits Syst Signal Process 43 , 1518–1548 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-023-02517-w

Download citation

Received : 05 March 2023

Revised : 12 September 2023

Accepted : 13 September 2023

Published : 02 November 2023

Issue Date : March 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-023-02517-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Beamforming
• Heterogeneity
• Channel statistics
• Outage Probability
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Reference Manager
• Simple TEXT file

People also looked at

Original research article, virtual surgical planning/3d printing assisted fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap combined with anterolateral thigh flaps for extensive composite oromandibular defects reconstruction: a retrospective study of case series.

• 1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
• 2 School of Stomatology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
• 3 Dental Digital Medicine and 3D Printing Engineering Laboratory of Qingdao, Qingdao, China
• 4 Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digital Medicine and Computer-Assisted Surgery, Qingdao, China

Oromandibular tumors or osteoradionecrosis often lead to extensive composite defects encompassing intraoral, bone and extraoral tissues. A single flap cannot simultaneously offer sufficient bone and soft tissue. The combination of free flaps could be a prospective approach to overcome the challenge. The study aims to assess the efficacy of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and 3D printing assisted fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap (FOSCF) combined with anterolateral thigh flaps (ALT) in reconstructing extensive composite defects in the oromandibular region. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 8 patients who underwent reconstruction using FOSCFs combined with ALTs. Post-surgical excision of the lesions, we obtained mean values for the defects of intraoral soft tissue, bone, extraoral soft tissue, namely, being 42.7 cm 2 , 96 mm, and 68.9 cm 2 . The mean surgical procedures took 712.5 min. A total of 16 flaps were harvested and transplanted for the 8 patients, with all successfully surviving. Postoperatively, complications manifested as localized intraoral infections in 2 cases, intermuscular vein thrombosis in another 2 cases, and pulmonary infections in 2 patients. Two patients unfortunately experienced tumor recurrence, at 12 and 3 months post-operation respectively. For the surviving 6 patients, the average follow-up period was 12.2 months. Regarding patient satisfaction, one expressed dissatisfaction with the contour of the mandible, and two exhibited moderate trismus. Objective assessments identified 1 case of oral incontinence and 2 cases where external flap contractures were observed. All 8 patients experienced restoration of masticatory function and were able to consume a soft diet within a month post-surgery. VSP/3D printing assisted FOSCFs combined with ALTs can be performed safely to reconstruct the extensive composite tissue defects in our study, with desirable esthetic and functional results, and it is a reliable option in selecting patients with defects involving multiple tissue types. However, the benefits of this method needed more cases to validate.

1 Introduction

Extensive composite oromandibular defects are frequently caused by surgical resection of sizeable primary tumors in the head and neck region, or the result of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) post-radiotherapy. The reconstruction of such complex defects, encompassing multiple structures such as external skin, mandible, and oral mucosa presents a formidable challenge. Free flap reconstruction is the standard of care in these extensive defects, while there may not exist a single free flap capable of simultaneously offering sufficient bone stock and soft tissue. In these instances, the combination of multiple free flaps proves to be an efficacious treatment strategy ( Lee et al., 2010 ; Weitz et al., 2015 ).

Selecting suitable free flap is integral to the reconstructive success and overall outcome. In contrast to iliac or scapular osteocutaneous free flaps, the FOSCF can provide longer bone segments as well as ample skin paddle for intraoral lining ( Taylor et al., 2016 ; Liu et al., 2022 ). The ALT is the most useful workhorse flap employed for microsurgical reconstruction. Depending on requirements, the flap can be harvested as myocutaneous, fasciocutaneous, adipofascial, or in combination with the adjacent tissues or muscles as chimeric flaps. This versatility makes it particularly suited for the reconstruction of extensive extraoral skin defects ( Hsieh et al., 2021 ; Ranganath et al., 2022 ). The advent of VSP and 3D printing marks a significant milestone for the FOSCF. The utilization of these techniques enhances the safety, accuracy, and symmetry of this surgical procedure while considerably reducing the operating time ( Ritschl et al., 2021 ; Al-Sabahi et al., 2022 ; Idris et al., 2022 ).

Despite their advantages, multi-flap approaches for the reconstruction of composite oromandibular defects continue to be challenging and are a subject of ongoing debate. A few reports are available on the functional and aesthetic outcome of double free flap reconstructions in these defects ( Lee et al., 2010 ; Tharakan et al., 2023 ). The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the combination of VSP/3D printing-assisted FOSCF with ALT in composite tissue defects reconstruction which could not be solved by one single flap.

2 Patients and methods

This study received approval from the Ethics Committee at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao (ethics number, QYFYWZLL 27958). A retrospective review was conducted of 8 patients who underwent extensive composite oromandibular defects repair using the combination of VSP/3D printing-assisted FOSCF with ALT between July 2019 and December 2022 at our department.

The cohort comprised seven males and one female. All patients had undergone lesion resection, with extensive defects variably involving oral mucosa, mandible, and perioral skin areas. All defects were reconstructed using a FOSCF in combination with ALT. A two-team approach was consistently employed throughout all stages of the operation.

2.1 Preparation of the FOSCF assisted by VSP and 3D printing

All patients underwent routine preoperative three-dimensional CT scan of the mandible and fibula (SOMATOM Force CT, slice thickness 0.625 mm), in addition to lower limb CT angiography (CTA). The acquired data were input into the Mimics 17.0 software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) in the DICOM format. The software was used to simulate tumor excision, fibula osteotomy, mandibular reconstruction, and the design of repositioning guides. In the process, the mandibular osteotomy guide and the fibula positioning guide share the same nail track to ensure the accuracy of mandibular reconstruction. For those mandibular defects not traversing the midline, mirror technology was employed to accomplish reconstruction. However, in cases where the defects did cross the midline, a synergistic approach combining mirror and surface reconstruction techniques was adopted. Following the completion of the virtual surgery, the designed guides were materialized using an 3D printer (UltraCraft A2D, HeyGears), and subsequently sterilized with plasma. The reconstruction-team prepared the FOSCF. The skin perforator was located and the skin paddle was incised in accordance with the magnitude of the intraoral soft tissue defect. The fibula osteotomy guide was positioned, leading to the fibula being cut to the length prescribed in the virtual surgery. The distal end of the fibular artery was ligated, preserving the proximal vascular pedicle. The fibula was then contoured using the shaping guide and secured in position with miniplates. Upon completing the FOSCF preparation, the same team proceeded to harvest the ALT.

2.2 Oral lesion excision

The resection-team was tasked with the excision of the tumor at its safe boundary. According to the preoperative virtual surgical design, the mandibular osteotomy guide was positioned, followed by the segmental resection of the mandible. After the complete excision of the tumor, two sets of recipient vessels were prepared. Subsequent to the surgical procedure, patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and tracheostomy was not a routine intervention. Patients were typically transferred back to the general ward within a period of 3–5 days postoperatively, contingent upon their stabilized condition. All patients needed nasogastric feeding for 1 week post-surgery. Subsequently, a soft or normal diet was gradually adopted. All patients except No.5 and No.8 underwent postoperative radiation therapy.

Surgical and medical complications were documented. A patients satisfaction questionnaire was administered to make subjective evaluation on chewing, speech, dry mouth and facial appearance, which were divided into three grades: very satisfied, satisfied and dissatisfied. To determine objective evaluation, facial appearance, oral incontinence, speech problems, eating problems, xerostomia, and flap contracture were assessed. Each individual item was scored using a Likert scale (1 = extremely abnormal and 5 = completely normal).

Our study comprised 8 patients including 7 males and 1 female, aged from 45 to 68 years (mean, 60.5 years). Seven of these patients presented with oral malignant tumors, all diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma, while one patient (No.5) had osteoradionecrosis as a consequence of radiation therapy. A total of 16 flaps were prepared for 8 patients, which consisted 8 FOSCFs and 8 ALTs. Post-excision of the lesions, the dimensions of the intraoral soft tissue defects ranged from 7.5 × 4 cm to 12 × 6.5 cm (mean, 42.7 cm 2 ). The length of the bone defects extended from 76 mm to 125 mm (mean, 96 mm), while the extraoral soft tissue defects varied from 8 × 5 cm to 14 × 9 cm (mean, 68.9 cm 2 ). The anastomosis involved recipient arteries that included the facial artery, superior thyroid artery, and lingual artery. Concurrently, the recipient veins involved were the facial vein, superior thyroid vein, internal jugular vein, and external jugular vein. One case required vascular grafting. The operative duration for these procedures ranged between 600 and 840 min, with an average of approximately 712.5 min ( Table 1 ).

TABLE 1 . Patient data.

Remarkably, all of the flaps survived without any vascular crises or local flap necrosis. Two cases (No.3, No.4) developed local oral infections. Additionally, intermuscular vein thrombosis in the lower limbs was observed 2 patients (No.2, No.5). Pulmonary infection was found in 2 cases (No.2, No.4). Unfortunately, 2 of the 8 patients succumbed due to tumor recurrence at 12 months and 3 months post-surgery respectively. The mean follow-up time of the remaining 6 patients was 12.2 months (range, 7 months–18 months). Patient satisfaction assessments revealed one individual (No.3) was dissatisfied with their post-operative appearance, while two (No.2, No.4) reported moderate trismus. However, the remaining patients all reported satisfaction levels above average. Objective evaluations indicated oral incontinence in 1 case (No.4) and external flap contracture in 2 cases (No.2, No.4). Impressively, all 8 patients regained masticatory function and resumed a soft diet within a month post-operation.

3.1 Case presentation

A 45-year-old male patient diagnosed with a squamous cell carcinoma on his left cheek. The tumor demonstrated regression by radiation therapy (66 Gy) 7 months ago. However, the anterior part was ulcerated and gradually formed a penetrating defect after 1 month. Histopathological examination confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, staged clinically as T4N1M0. With the assistance of VSP and 3D printing technology, the reconstruction utilising both flaps was successfully performed ( Figures 1 , 2 ).

FIGURE 1 . The preoperative virtual surgical design: (A) . Determine the range of the lesion. (B) Simulate the range of bone cutting. (C) Design the bone cutting guide. (D) Design the fibula osteotomy guide. (E) Design the fibula repositioning guide. (F) Restore the mandibular contour.

FIGURE 2 . Operational procedure: (A) . Preoperative photo. (B) Fibula shaping. (C) Fibula positioning. (D) Harvest of the ALT. (E) The fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap was used to repair the oral soft tissue and the mandible, and the ALT was used to repair the extraoral tissues. (F) 6 months post-operation.

4 Discussion

Surgical removal of oral tumors or osteoradionecrosis can result in substantial composite tissue defects, presenting formidable challenges for reconstructive repair. A single flap is often insufficient to adequately address these extensive defects. Consequently, the combination of multiple flaps has emerged as an innovative therapeutic approach ( Lee et al., 2010 ; Weitz et al., 2015 ; Hsieh and Bewley, 2019 ; Silva et al., 2019 ; Moratin et al., 2021 ; Raghuram et al., 2021 ; Santilli et al., 2021 ; Tharakan et al., 2023 ). The ALT can furnish sufficient tissue volume and can be fashioned into a chimeric flap with minimal impact on the donor site, rendering it an optimal choice for repair and reconstruction of large soft tissue defects in the oromandibular region ( Thomas et al., 2020 ). The FOSCF is exceptionally suitable for large bone tissue defects. Its accompanying skin paddle can repair tissues both inside or outside the oral cavity, and its associated muscle can effectively fill the surgical dead space ( Dowthwaite et al., 2013 ). Therefore, for large composite tissue defects in the oromandibular region, we opt for the ALT for the repair of extraoral soft tissue defects and the FOSCF for the repair of bone and intraoral soft tissue defects. Nevertheless, surgical alternatives should be carefully considered. The fibular flap can be substituted with a reconstruction plate, iliac bone muscle flap, or scapular bone muscle flap. Soft tissue flap can be replaced with a vascularized free flap or pedicled flap, such as the forearm flap, rectus abdominis flap, or pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. However, the radial forearm flap offers limited soft tissue volume, it is difficult to fill the dead cavity effectively. Its application is further limited by the severe scarring left on the forearm, tendon exposure, and forearm mobility disorders ( Ranganath et al., 2022 ). The rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap can deliver a satisfactory volume of soft tissue, yet it may trigger complications such as reduced abdominal wall strength and incisional hernia. While the pectoralis major flap supplies generous soft tissue, it’s typically considered a backup option. The free iliac flap has insufficient bone length to adequately repair the defects. Besides, the free scapular flap cannot effectively mimic the shape of the mandibula, and has limitations in deficient bone length ( Liu et al., 2022 ). Moreover, reconstruction plates are prone to complications like screw loosening, plate fracture, plate exposure and stress shielding.

A unique aspect of our study is the incorporation of VSP and 3D printing. VSP allows for tailoring surgical approaches, ensuring precise lesion delineation, osteotomy localization, and fibula harvest estimation. Preoperative mandibular modeling not only reduces surgical time but also ensures superior functional and aesthetic outcomes. 3D-printed guides, enhance surgical accuracy, fostering a closer match to the original mandibular structure. Shared screw tracks between the mandibular osteotomy and fibula positioning guides simplify the procedure, further minimizing trauma and operative time ( Seruya et al., 2013 ; Schepers et al., 2015 ; Wu et al., 2021 ). Using the osteotomy guide and positioning guide, the fibula is contoured and then affixed with mini titanium plates. Shaw et al. (2004) proved that there were no significant differences in complications between miniplates and reconstruction plates, but the author also highlighted the defects of reconstruction plates, including stress shielding, interference with the vascular pedicle, and problems of metal fatigue when bending plates in the sagittal plane. In comparison, miniplates which avoid the above drawbacks are a better choice. Intermaxillary fixation was performed after surgery for 1 week, encouraging oral exercises to prevent trismus.

The vascular pedicle is severed after the recipient vessels are prepared, markedly reducing ischemic time and overall duration of the surgery. Literature indicates that when the ALT donor site width is under 8.0 cm, primary closure is feasible; for wider defects, skin grafting becomes necessary ( Chen and Tang, 2003 ). Some reports suggest that direct suturing is feasible when the width is less than 10.0 cm ( Townley et al., 2011 ). Studies have proposed that the ratio of flap width to thigh circumference can serve as a reliable metric for direct wound closure, with a ratio less than 16% indicating direct closure ( Boca et al., 2010 ). In our study, we found that for one patient, the flap width was 9.0 cm, and direct suturing did not induce fascial compartment syndrome or other complications.

While the use of double flaps allows for the repair of large composite tissue defects in the oromandibular region, overcoming the limitations of a single flap or composite flap due to vascular pedicle restrictions, it demands higher provisions for neck vessels. This includes the preparation of two sets of anastomotic arteries and veins in the recipient area. In our study, it was found that arteries were relatively easier to prepare, with a total of 16 arteries prepared. The most frequently used anastomotic arteries were the facial artery and the superior thyroid artery, while the facial vein and internal jugular vein were the most commonly used anastomotic veins. Flow-through flaps, as reported in literature ( Qing et al., 2015 ; He et al., 2021 ), allow the usage of only one set of recipient area vessels. However, this approach carries a significant drawback: if a vascular crisis arises, both flaps are in danger of necrosis. Therefore, we advocate for the preparation of two sets of anastomotic arteries and veins in the recipient area to mitigate such circumstances. Literature suggests that the ligated internal jugular vein can be utilized for end-to-side anastomosis, offering a method for venous anastomosis ( Akazawa et al., 2019 ). Furthermore, it has been reported that the transverse cervical vein and superficial temporal vein can also serve as recipient area vessels ( Hansen et al., 2007 ; Tessler et al., 2017 ; Wang et al., 2021 ).

This method affords greater flexibility and autonomy, but it involves extended operation time, high costs, considerable trauma, and numerous potential complications. It mandates superior surgical skill, restricting its broader implementation. Inexperienced medical institutions and young physicians should first master single flap reconstruction before considering advanced techniques. Without this foundation, there’s a risk of increased surgical complications and irreversible outcomes. Additionally, the inclusion of 3D printing escalates treatment costs, making this approach unfeasible for institutions lacking this technology. In our study, though every flap transplantation was triumphant, five cases did confront complications. Two cases suffered from local oral infections and gradually recovered after conservative treatments. Two patients presented with intermuscular vein thrombosis in the lower limbs, which were successfully managed with oral medication, preventing the progression to potential organ embolisms such as cardiac, pulmonary, or cerebral embolism. Additionally, two cases demonstrated a pulmonary infection, which was effectively controlled with antibiotic therapy ( Tharakan et al., 2023 ). reported postoperative complications in multi-flap surgeries to range from 26% to 50%, aligning with our findings. Earlier research indicated a 5-year survival rate for advanced head and neck cancers between 25% and 56% ( Abdelmeguid et al., 2021 ; Mody et al., 2021 ). Our study, with 2 out of 8 patients succumbing to postoperative tumor recurrence, indicates a marginally superior survival rate, albeit potentially influenced by the relatively shorter follow-up duration. In summary, our study’s outcomes resonate with existing literature, suggesting that this approach doesn’t elevate complications or mortality rates.

It is crucial to acknowledge that patients who are candidates for this procedure are typically in the advanced stages of oral cancer. As such, it is of utmost importance to strictly adhere to the surgical indications:

1) The presence of extensive composite tissue defects, including intraoral, mandibula, and extraoral tissue defects that are too extensive to be repaired with a single flap;

2) The patient must be in good physical health, without obvious surgical contraindications such as congestive heart failure, pulmonary dysfunction, or neck vessel thrombosis;

3) The tumor can be completely resectable without systemic metastasis of lung and bone tissues;

4) The patient must possess a strong desire to combat the disease, as a positive attitude towards treatment is crucial.

However, this study does have limitations. Denture restoration is crucial for patients’ masticatory function ( Sozzi et al., 2017 ). Found that implant survival was high and implant-supported prostheses were a reliable rehabilitation option in patients whose jaws have been reconstruction with fibula-free flap. In our surgical method, fibula was used to prepare for implant repair in the future. However, due to postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy, patients paid more attention to tumor treatment and neglected denture repair. Both function and aesthetics are critically important, yet there is a potential gap in patients’ understanding of these aspects. Consequently, it’s our responsibility to educate them, promoting the benefits of implant restorations to restore masticatory function. Because of the rarity of such patients, we were unable to conduct controlled studies to objectively evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this method compared to other treatment modalities. Nonetheless, we are confident that as the number of cases increases, the effectiveness of this treatment strategy will be confirmed. Moreover, the success of the double-flap surgery heavily relies on a precise preoperative surgical design and thorough considerations. The surgical approach offers limited flexibility, and the surgical procedure cannot be changed arbitrarily during the operation, as any deviations may result in a mismatch with the original design. Should unforeseen circumstances arise intraoperatively, we are prepared to implement alternative surgical strategies. Developing methodologies to anticipate, mitigate, and adeptly respond to such occurrences will constitute a primary objective in our ongoing research endeavors.

5 Conclusion

In conclusion, VSP/3D printing assisted FOSCFs combined with ALTs offers a safe and effective avenue for reconstructing oromandibular massive composite tissue defects in the study. However, the broader benefits and efficacy of this technique necessitate further validation through an expanded patient cohort.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the ethical committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

YX: Investigation, Writing–original draft. YL: Investigation, Visualization, Writing–original draft. WX: Visualization, Writing–original draft. JY: Data curation, Writing–review and editing. LX: Validation, Writing–review and editing. LL: Data curation, Writing–review and editing. ZX: Formal Analysis, Writing–review and editing. JS: Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing–review and editing.

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Qingdao Medical and Health Research Program (grant number: 2021-WJZD193), the Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital Clinical Medicine + X Scientific Research Project (grant number: QDFY+X202101041), the Shandong Province Medical and Health Technology Development Plan Project (grant number: 202208020979), Qingdao Key Health Discipline Development Fund and Oral Medicine Climbing Discipline Project in Qingdao.

Acknowledgments

This study was approved by the ethical committee of the affiliated hospital of qingdao university (NO. QYFYWZLL 27958).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abdelmeguid, A. S., Silver, N. L., Boonsripitayanon, M., Glisson, B. S., Ferrarotto, R., Gunn, G. B., et al. (2021). Role of induction chemotherapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 127, 3107–3112. doi:10.1002/cncr.33616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Akazawa, T., Sekido, M., Adachi, K., Sasaki, K., Aihara, Y., Shibuya, Y., et al. (2019). End-to-Side venous anastomosis to a ligated vein stump for free flap transfer in head and neck reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg. 83, 180–182. doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000001905

Al-Sabahi, M. E., Jamali, O. M., Shindy, M. I., Moussa, B. G., Amin, A. A., and Zedan, M. H. (2022). Aesthetic reconstruction of onco-surgical mandibular defects using free fibular flap with and without CAD/CAM customized osteotomy guide: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Cancer 22, 1252. doi:10.1186/s12885-022-10322-y

Boca, R., Kuo, Y. R., Hsieh, C. H., Huang, E. Y., and Jeng, S. F. (2010). A reliable parameter for primary closure of the free anterolateral thigh flap donor site. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 126, 1558–1562. doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181ef8cb7

Chen, H. C., and Tang, Y. B. (2003). Anterolateral thigh flap: an ideal soft tissue flap. Clin. Plast. Surg. 30, 383–401. doi:10.1016/s0094-1298(03)00040-3

Dowthwaite, S. A., Theurer, J., Belzile, M., Fung, K., Franklin, J., Nichols, A., et al. (2013). Comparison of fibular and scapular osseous free flaps for oromandibular reconstruction: a patient-centered approach to flap selection. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 139, 285–292. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1802

Hansen, S. L., Foster, R. D., Dosanjh, A. S., Mathes, S. J., Hoffman, W. Y., and Leon, P. (2007). Superficial temporal artery and vein as recipient vessels for facial and scalp microsurgical reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 120, 1879–1884. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000287273.48145.bd

He, J., Qing, L., Wu, P., Zhou, Z., Yu, F., and Tang, J. (2021). Large wounds reconstruction of the lower extremity with combined latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and flow-through anterolateral thigh perforator flap transfer. Microsurgery 41, 533–542. doi:10.1002/micr.30754

Hsieh, F., Leow, O. Q. Y., Cheong, C. F., Hung, S. Y., and Tsao, C. K. (2021). Musculoseptocutaneous perforator of anterolateral thigh flap: a clinical study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 147, 103e–110e. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000007471

Hsieh, T. Y., and Bewley, A. (2019). Use of multiple free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 27, 392–400. doi:10.1097/moo.0000000000000574

Idris, S., Logan, H., Tabet, P., Osswald, M., Nayar, S., and Seikaly, H. (2022). The accuracy of 3D surgical design and simulation in prefabricated fibula free flaps for jaw reconstruction. J. Pers. Med. 12, 1766. doi:10.3390/jpm12111766

Lee, J. T., Hsu, H., Wang, C. H., Cheng, L. F., Sun, T. B., Huang, C. C., et al. (2010). Reconstruction of extensive composite oromandibular defects with simultaneous free anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous and fibular osteocutaneous flaps. J. Reconstr. Microsurg 26, 145–151. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1242134

Liu, A. Q., Deane, E. C., Heffernan, A., Ji, Y., Durham, J. S., and Prisman, E. (2022). Patient-reported outcomes and morbidity after head and neck reconstructions: an evaluation of fibular and scapular free flaps. Oral Oncol. 132, 106019. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106019

Mody, M. D., Rocco, J. W., Yom, S. S., Haddad, R. I., and Saba, N. F. (2021). Head and neck cancer. Lancet 398, 2289–2299. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01550-6

Moratin, J., Horn, D., Heinemann, M., Metzger, K., Mrosek, J., Ristow, O., et al. (2021). Multiple sequential free flap reconstructions of the head and neck: a single-center experience. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 148, 791e–799e. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000008432

Qing, L., Wu, P., Liang, J., Yu, F., Wang, C., and Tang, J. (2015). Use of flow-through anterolateral thigh perforator flaps in reconstruction of complex extremity defects. J. Reconstr. Microsurg 31, 571–578. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1555138

Raghuram, A. C., Manfro, G., Teixeira, G. V., Cernea, C. R., Dias, F. L., Marco, M., et al. (2021). Use of single chimeric free flaps or double free flaps for complex head and neck reconstruction. J. Reconstr. Microsurg 37, 791–798. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1727188

Ranganath, K., Jalisi, S. M., Naples, J. G., and Gomez, E. D. (2022). Comparing outcomes of radial forearm free flaps and anterolateral thigh free flaps in oral cavity reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 135, 106214. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106214

Ritschl, L. M., Mucke, T., Hart, D., Unterhuber, T., Kehl, V., Wolff, K. D., et al. (2021). Retrospective analysis of complications in 190 mandibular resections and simultaneous reconstructions with free fibula flap, iliac crest flap or reconstruction plate: a comparative single centre study. Clin. Oral Investig. 25, 2905–2914. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03607-8

Santilli, M., D'Addazio, G., Rexhepi, I., Sinjari, B., and Filippini, A. (2021). Multiple free flap reconstruction of a complex intraoral defect after squamous cell carcinoma excision: a case report. Med. Kaunas. 58, 54. doi:10.3390/medicina58010054

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schepers, R. H., Raghoebar, G. M., Vissink, A., Stenekes, M. W., Kraeima, J., Roodenburg, J. L., et al. (2015). Accuracy of fibula reconstruction using patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates and dental implants: a new modality for functional reconstruction of mandibular defects. J. Craniomaxillofac Surg. 43, 649–657. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.015

Seruya, M., Fisher, M., and Rodriguez, E. D. (2013). Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: an outcomes comparison. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 132, 1219–1228. doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a3c0b1

Shaw, R. J., Kanatas, A. N., Lowe, D., Brown, J. S., Rogers, S. N., and Vaughan, E. D. (2004). Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction. Head. Neck 26, 456–463. doi:10.1002/hed.10343

Silva, A. K., Humphries, L. S., Maldonado, A. A., and Gottlieb, L. J. (2019). Chimeric vs composite flaps for mandible reconstruction. Head. Neck 41, 1597–1604. doi:10.1002/hed.25606

Sozzi, D., Novelli, G., Silva, R., Connelly, S. T., and Tartaglia, G. M. (2017). Implant rehabilitation in fibula-free flap reconstruction: a retrospective study of cases at 1-18 years following surgery. J. Craniomaxillofac Surg. 45, 1655–1661. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2017.06.021

Taylor, G. I., Corlett, R. J., and Ashton, M. W. (2016). The evolution of free vascularized bone transfer: a 40-year experience. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 137, 1292–1305. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000002040

Tessler, O., Gilardino, M. S., Bartow, M. J., St Hilaire, H., Womac, D., Dionisopoulos, T., et al. (2017). Transverse cervical artery: consistent anatomical landmarks and clinical experience with its use as a recipient artery in complex head and neck reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 139, 745e–751e. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000003085

Tharakan, T., Marfowaa, G., Akakpo, K., Jackson, R., Zenga, J., Puram, S. V., et al. (2023). Multiple simultaneous free flaps for head and neck reconstruction: a multi-institutional cohort. Oral Oncol. 136, 106269. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106269

Thomas, W. W., Calcagno, H. E., Azzi, J., Petrisor, D., Cave, T., Barber, B., et al. (2020). Incidence of inadequate perforators and salvage options for the anterior lateral thigh free flap. Laryngoscope 130, 343–346. doi:10.1002/lary.28176

Townley, W. A., Royston, E. C., Karmiris, N., Crick, A., and Dunn, R. L. (2011). Critical assessment of the anterolateral thigh flap donor site. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 64, 1621–1626. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2011.07.015

Wang, L., Ma, C. Y., Shen, Y., Fang, J., Haugen, T. W., Guo, B., et al. (2021). Transverse cervical artery anterior perforator flap for head and neck oncological reconstruction: preliminary study. Head. Neck 43, 3598–3607. doi:10.1002/hed.26873

Weitz, J., Kreutzer, K., Bauer, F. J., Wolff, K. D., Nobis, C. P., and Kesting, M. R. (2015). Sandwich flaps as a feasible solution for the management of huge mandibular composite tissue defects. J. Craniomaxillofac Surg. 43, 1769–1775. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.038

Wu, P., Hu, L., Li, H., Feng, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., et al. (2021). Clinical application and accuracy analysis of 3D printing guide plate based on polylactic acid in mandible reconstruction with fibula flap. Ann. Transl. Med. 9, 460. doi:10.21037/atm-20-6781

Keywords: flap transplantation, reconstructive surgery, virtual surgical planning, multipleflap, 3D printing

Citation: Xu Y, Li Y, Xiao W, Yue J, Xue L, Li L, Xu Z and Sun J (2023) Virtual surgical planning/3D printing assisted fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap combined with anterolateral thigh flaps for extensive composite oromandibular defects reconstruction: a retrospective study of case series. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11:1273318. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1273318

Received: 05 August 2023; Accepted: 23 October 2023; Published: 02 November 2023.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2023 Xu, Li, Xiao, Yue, Xue, Li, Xu and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jian Sun, [email protected]

This article is part of the Research Topic

Advanced Oral Disease Therapy: Approaches, Biotechnology, and Bioactive Materials, Volume II