case study characteristics

The Ultimate Guide to Qualitative Research - Part 1: The Basics

• Introduction and overview
• What is qualitative research?
• What is qualitative data?
• Examples of qualitative data
• Qualitative vs. quantitative research
• Mixed methods
• Qualitative research preparation
• Theoretical perspective
• Theoretical framework
• Literature reviews

Research question

• Conceptual framework
• Conceptual vs. theoretical framework

Data collection

• Qualitative research methods
• Focus groups
• Observational research

What is a case study?

Applications for case study research, what is a good case study, process of case study design, benefits and limitations of case studies.

• Ethnographical research
• Ethical considerations
• Confidentiality and privacy
• Power dynamics
• Reflexivity

Case studies

Case studies are essential to qualitative research , offering a lens through which researchers can investigate complex phenomena within their real-life contexts. This chapter explores the concept, purpose, applications, examples, and types of case studies and provides guidance on how to conduct case study research effectively.

Whereas quantitative methods look at phenomena at scale, case study research looks at a concept or phenomenon in considerable detail. While analyzing a single case can help understand one perspective regarding the object of research inquiry, analyzing multiple cases can help obtain a more holistic sense of the topic or issue. Let's provide a basic definition of a case study, then explore its characteristics and role in the qualitative research process.

Definition of a case study

A case study in qualitative research is a strategy of inquiry that involves an in-depth investigation of a phenomenon within its real-world context. It provides researchers with the opportunity to acquire an in-depth understanding of intricate details that might not be as apparent or accessible through other methods of research. The specific case or cases being studied can be a single person, group, or organization – demarcating what constitutes a relevant case worth studying depends on the researcher and their research question .

Among qualitative research methods , a case study relies on multiple sources of evidence, such as documents, artifacts, interviews , or observations , to present a complete and nuanced understanding of the phenomenon under investigation. The objective is to illuminate the readers' understanding of the phenomenon beyond its abstract statistical or theoretical explanations.

Characteristics of case studies

Case studies typically possess a number of distinct characteristics that set them apart from other research methods. These characteristics include a focus on holistic description and explanation, flexibility in the design and data collection methods, reliance on multiple sources of evidence, and emphasis on the context in which the phenomenon occurs.

Furthermore, case studies can often involve a longitudinal examination of the case, meaning they study the case over a period of time. These characteristics allow case studies to yield comprehensive, in-depth, and richly contextualized insights about the phenomenon of interest.

The role of case studies in research

Case studies hold a unique position in the broader landscape of research methods aimed at theory development. They are instrumental when the primary research interest is to gain an intensive, detailed understanding of a phenomenon in its real-life context.

In addition, case studies can serve different purposes within research - they can be used for exploratory, descriptive, or explanatory purposes, depending on the research question and objectives. This flexibility and depth make case studies a valuable tool in the toolkit of qualitative researchers.

Remember, a well-conducted case study can offer a rich, insightful contribution to both academic and practical knowledge through theory development or theory verification, thus enhancing our understanding of complex phenomena in their real-world contexts.

What is the purpose of a case study?

Case study research aims for a more comprehensive understanding of phenomena, requiring various research methods to gather information for qualitative analysis . Ultimately, a case study can allow the researcher to gain insight into a particular object of inquiry and develop a theoretical framework relevant to the research inquiry.

Why use case studies in qualitative research?

Using case studies as a research strategy depends mainly on the nature of the research question and the researcher's access to the data.

Conducting case study research provides a level of detail and contextual richness that other research methods might not offer. They are beneficial when there's a need to understand complex social phenomena within their natural contexts.

The explanatory, exploratory, and descriptive roles of case studies

Case studies can take on various roles depending on the research objectives. They can be exploratory when the research aims to discover new phenomena or define new research questions; they are descriptive when the objective is to depict a phenomenon within its context in a detailed manner; and they can be explanatory if the goal is to understand specific relationships within the studied context. Thus, the versatility of case studies allows researchers to approach their topic from different angles, offering multiple ways to uncover and interpret the data .

The impact of case studies on knowledge development

Case studies play a significant role in knowledge development across various disciplines. Analysis of cases provides an avenue for researchers to explore phenomena within their context based on the collected data.

This can result in the production of rich, practical insights that can be instrumental in both theory-building and practice. Case studies allow researchers to delve into the intricacies and complexities of real-life situations, uncovering insights that might otherwise remain hidden.

Types of case studies

In qualitative research , a case study is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Depending on the nature of the research question and the specific objectives of the study, researchers might choose to use different types of case studies. These types differ in their focus, methodology, and the level of detail they provide about the phenomenon under investigation.

Understanding these types is crucial for selecting the most appropriate approach for your research project and effectively achieving your research goals. Let's briefly look at the main types of case studies.

Exploratory case studies

Exploratory case studies are typically conducted to develop a theory or framework around an understudied phenomenon. They can also serve as a precursor to a larger-scale research project. Exploratory case studies are useful when a researcher wants to identify the key issues or questions which can spur more extensive study or be used to develop propositions for further research. These case studies are characterized by flexibility, allowing researchers to explore various aspects of a phenomenon as they emerge, which can also form the foundation for subsequent studies.

Descriptive case studies

Descriptive case studies aim to provide a complete and accurate representation of a phenomenon or event within its context. These case studies are often based on an established theoretical framework, which guides how data is collected and analyzed. The researcher is concerned with describing the phenomenon in detail, as it occurs naturally, without trying to influence or manipulate it.

Explanatory case studies

Explanatory case studies are focused on explanation - they seek to clarify how or why certain phenomena occur. Often used in complex, real-life situations, they can be particularly valuable in clarifying causal relationships among concepts and understanding the interplay between different factors within a specific context.

Intrinsic, instrumental, and collective case studies

These three categories of case studies focus on the nature and purpose of the study. An intrinsic case study is conducted when a researcher has an inherent interest in the case itself. Instrumental case studies are employed when the case is used to provide insight into a particular issue or phenomenon. A collective case study, on the other hand, involves studying multiple cases simultaneously to investigate some general phenomena.

Each type of case study serves a different purpose and has its own strengths and challenges. The selection of the type should be guided by the research question and objectives, as well as the context and constraints of the research.

The flexibility, depth, and contextual richness offered by case studies make this approach an excellent research method for various fields of study. They enable researchers to investigate real-world phenomena within their specific contexts, capturing nuances that other research methods might miss. Across numerous fields, case studies provide valuable insights into complex issues.

Critical information systems research

Case studies provide a detailed understanding of the role and impact of information systems in different contexts. They offer a platform to explore how information systems are designed, implemented, and used and how they interact with various social, economic, and political factors. Case studies in this field often focus on examining the intricate relationship between technology, organizational processes, and user behavior, helping to uncover insights that can inform better system design and implementation.

Health research

Health research is another field where case studies are highly valuable. They offer a way to explore patient experiences, healthcare delivery processes, and the impact of various interventions in a real-world context.

Case studies can provide a deep understanding of a patient's journey, giving insights into the intricacies of disease progression, treatment effects, and the psychosocial aspects of health and illness.

Asthma research studies

Specifically within medical research, studies on asthma often employ case studies to explore the individual and environmental factors that influence asthma development, management, and outcomes. A case study can provide rich, detailed data about individual patients' experiences, from the triggers and symptoms they experience to the effectiveness of various management strategies. This can be crucial for developing patient-centered asthma care approaches.

Other fields

Apart from the fields mentioned, case studies are also extensively used in business and management research, education research, and political sciences, among many others. They provide an opportunity to delve into the intricacies of real-world situations, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of various phenomena.

Case studies, with their depth and contextual focus, offer unique insights across these varied fields. They allow researchers to illuminate the complexities of real-life situations, contributing to both theory and practice.

Whatever field you're in, ATLAS.ti puts your data to work for you

Download a free trial of ATLAS.ti to turn your data into insights.

Understanding the key elements of case study design is crucial for conducting rigorous and impactful case study research. A well-structured design guides the researcher through the process, ensuring that the study is methodologically sound and its findings are reliable and valid. The main elements of case study design include the research question , propositions, units of analysis, and the logic linking the data to the propositions.

The research question is the foundation of any research study. A good research question guides the direction of the study and informs the selection of the case, the methods of collecting data, and the analysis techniques. A well-formulated research question in case study research is typically clear, focused, and complex enough to merit further detailed examination of the relevant case(s).

Propositions

Propositions, though not necessary in every case study, provide a direction by stating what we might expect to find in the data collected. They guide how data is collected and analyzed by helping researchers focus on specific aspects of the case. They are particularly important in explanatory case studies, which seek to understand the relationships among concepts within the studied phenomenon.

Units of analysis

The unit of analysis refers to the case, or the main entity or entities that are being analyzed in the study. In case study research, the unit of analysis can be an individual, a group, an organization, a decision, an event, or even a time period. It's crucial to clearly define the unit of analysis, as it shapes the qualitative data analysis process by allowing the researcher to analyze a particular case and synthesize analysis across multiple case studies to draw conclusions.

Argumentation

This refers to the inferential model that allows researchers to draw conclusions from the data. The researcher needs to ensure that there is a clear link between the data, the propositions (if any), and the conclusions drawn. This argumentation is what enables the researcher to make valid and credible inferences about the phenomenon under study.

Understanding and carefully considering these elements in the design phase of a case study can significantly enhance the quality of the research. It can help ensure that the study is methodologically sound and its findings contribute meaningful insights about the case.

Ready to jumpstart your research with ATLAS.ti?

Conceptualize your research project with our intuitive data analysis interface. Download a free trial today.

Conducting a case study involves several steps, from defining the research question and selecting the case to collecting and analyzing data . This section outlines these key stages, providing a practical guide on how to conduct case study research.

Defining the research question

The first step in case study research is defining a clear, focused research question. This question should guide the entire research process, from case selection to analysis. It's crucial to ensure that the research question is suitable for a case study approach. Typically, such questions are exploratory or descriptive in nature and focus on understanding a phenomenon within its real-life context.

Selecting and defining the case

The selection of the case should be based on the research question and the objectives of the study. It involves choosing a unique example or a set of examples that provide rich, in-depth data about the phenomenon under investigation. After selecting the case, it's crucial to define it clearly, setting the boundaries of the case, including the time period and the specific context.

Previous research can help guide the case study design. When considering a case study, an example of a case could be taken from previous case study research and used to define cases in a new research inquiry. Considering recently published examples can help understand how to select and define cases effectively.

Developing a detailed case study protocol

A case study protocol outlines the procedures and general rules to be followed during the case study. This includes the data collection methods to be used, the sources of data, and the procedures for analysis. Having a detailed case study protocol ensures consistency and reliability in the study.

The protocol should also consider how to work with the people involved in the research context to grant the research team access to collecting data. As mentioned in previous sections of this guide, establishing rapport is an essential component of qualitative research as it shapes the overall potential for collecting and analyzing data.

Collecting data

Gathering data in case study research often involves multiple sources of evidence, including documents, archival records, interviews, observations, and physical artifacts. This allows for a comprehensive understanding of the case. The process for gathering data should be systematic and carefully documented to ensure the reliability and validity of the study.

Analyzing and interpreting data

The next step is analyzing the data. This involves organizing the data , categorizing it into themes or patterns , and interpreting these patterns to answer the research question. The analysis might also involve comparing the findings with prior research or theoretical propositions.

Writing the case study report

The final step is writing the case study report . This should provide a detailed description of the case, the data, the analysis process, and the findings. The report should be clear, organized, and carefully written to ensure that the reader can understand the case and the conclusions drawn from it.

Each of these steps is crucial in ensuring that the case study research is rigorous, reliable, and provides valuable insights about the case.

The type, depth, and quality of data in your study can significantly influence the validity and utility of the study. In case study research, data is usually collected from multiple sources to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the case. This section will outline the various methods of collecting data used in case study research and discuss considerations for ensuring the quality of the data.

Interviews are a common method of gathering data in case study research. They can provide rich, in-depth data about the perspectives, experiences, and interpretations of the individuals involved in the case. Interviews can be structured , semi-structured , or unstructured , depending on the research question and the degree of flexibility needed.

Observations

Observations involve the researcher observing the case in its natural setting, providing first-hand information about the case and its context. Observations can provide data that might not be revealed in interviews or documents, such as non-verbal cues or contextual information.

Documents and artifacts

Documents and archival records provide a valuable source of data in case study research. They can include reports, letters, memos, meeting minutes, email correspondence, and various public and private documents related to the case.

These records can provide historical context, corroborate evidence from other sources, and offer insights into the case that might not be apparent from interviews or observations.

Physical artifacts refer to any physical evidence related to the case, such as tools, products, or physical environments. These artifacts can provide tangible insights into the case, complementing the data gathered from other sources.

Ensuring the quality of data collection

Determining the quality of data in case study research requires careful planning and execution. It's crucial to ensure that the data is reliable, accurate, and relevant to the research question. This involves selecting appropriate methods of collecting data, properly training interviewers or observers, and systematically recording and storing the data. It also includes considering ethical issues related to collecting and handling data, such as obtaining informed consent and ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of the participants.

Data analysis

Analyzing case study research involves making sense of the rich, detailed data to answer the research question. This process can be challenging due to the volume and complexity of case study data. However, a systematic and rigorous approach to analysis can ensure that the findings are credible and meaningful. This section outlines the main steps and considerations in analyzing data in case study research.

Organizing the data

The first step in the analysis is organizing the data. This involves sorting the data into manageable sections, often according to the data source or the theme. This step can also involve transcribing interviews, digitizing physical artifacts, or organizing observational data.

Categorizing and coding the data

Once the data is organized, the next step is to categorize or code the data. This involves identifying common themes, patterns, or concepts in the data and assigning codes to relevant data segments. Coding can be done manually or with the help of software tools, and in either case, qualitative analysis software can greatly facilitate the entire coding process. Coding helps to reduce the data to a set of themes or categories that can be more easily analyzed.

Identifying patterns and themes

After coding the data, the researcher looks for patterns or themes in the coded data. This involves comparing and contrasting the codes and looking for relationships or patterns among them. The identified patterns and themes should help answer the research question.

Interpreting the data

Once patterns and themes have been identified, the next step is to interpret these findings. This involves explaining what the patterns or themes mean in the context of the research question and the case. This interpretation should be grounded in the data, but it can also involve drawing on theoretical concepts or prior research.

Verification of the data

The last step in the analysis is verification. This involves checking the accuracy and consistency of the analysis process and confirming that the findings are supported by the data. This can involve re-checking the original data, checking the consistency of codes, or seeking feedback from research participants or peers.

Like any research method , case study research has its strengths and limitations. Researchers must be aware of these, as they can influence the design, conduct, and interpretation of the study.

Understanding the strengths and limitations of case study research can also guide researchers in deciding whether this approach is suitable for their research question . This section outlines some of the key strengths and limitations of case study research.

Benefits include the following:

• Rich, detailed data: One of the main strengths of case study research is that it can generate rich, detailed data about the case. This can provide a deep understanding of the case and its context, which can be valuable in exploring complex phenomena.
• Flexibility: Case study research is flexible in terms of design , data collection , and analysis . A sufficient degree of flexibility allows the researcher to adapt the study according to the case and the emerging findings.
• Real-world context: Case study research involves studying the case in its real-world context, which can provide valuable insights into the interplay between the case and its context.
• Multiple sources of evidence: Case study research often involves collecting data from multiple sources , which can enhance the robustness and validity of the findings.

On the other hand, researchers should consider the following limitations:

• Generalizability: A common criticism of case study research is that its findings might not be generalizable to other cases due to the specificity and uniqueness of each case.
• Time and resource intensive: Case study research can be time and resource intensive due to the depth of the investigation and the amount of collected data.
• Complexity of analysis: The rich, detailed data generated in case study research can make analyzing the data challenging.
• Subjectivity: Given the nature of case study research, there may be a higher degree of subjectivity in interpreting the data , so researchers need to reflect on this and transparently convey to audiences how the research was conducted.

Being aware of these strengths and limitations can help researchers design and conduct case study research effectively and interpret and report the findings appropriately.

Ready to analyze your data with ATLAS.ti?

See how our intuitive software can draw key insights from your data with a free trial today.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• Case Study | Definition, Examples & Methods

Case Study | Definition, Examples & Methods

Published on 5 May 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 30 January 2023.

A case study is a detailed study of a specific subject, such as a person, group, place, event, organisation, or phenomenon. Case studies are commonly used in social, educational, clinical, and business research.

A case study research design usually involves qualitative methods , but quantitative methods are sometimes also used. Case studies are good for describing , comparing, evaluating, and understanding different aspects of a research problem .

Table of contents

When to do a case study, step 1: select a case, step 2: build a theoretical framework, step 3: collect your data, step 4: describe and analyse the case.

A case study is an appropriate research design when you want to gain concrete, contextual, in-depth knowledge about a specific real-world subject. It allows you to explore the key characteristics, meanings, and implications of the case.

Case studies are often a good choice in a thesis or dissertation . They keep your project focused and manageable when you don’t have the time or resources to do large-scale research.

You might use just one complex case study where you explore a single subject in depth, or conduct multiple case studies to compare and illuminate different aspects of your research problem.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Once you have developed your problem statement and research questions , you should be ready to choose the specific case that you want to focus on. A good case study should have the potential to:

• Provide new or unexpected insights into the subject
• Challenge or complicate existing assumptions and theories
• Propose practical courses of action to resolve a problem
• Open up new directions for future research

Unlike quantitative or experimental research, a strong case study does not require a random or representative sample. In fact, case studies often deliberately focus on unusual, neglected, or outlying cases which may shed new light on the research problem.

If you find yourself aiming to simultaneously investigate and solve an issue, consider conducting action research . As its name suggests, action research conducts research and takes action at the same time, and is highly iterative and flexible. 

However, you can also choose a more common or representative case to exemplify a particular category, experience, or phenomenon.

While case studies focus more on concrete details than general theories, they should usually have some connection with theory in the field. This way the case study is not just an isolated description, but is integrated into existing knowledge about the topic. It might aim to:

• Exemplify a theory by showing how it explains the case under investigation
• Expand on a theory by uncovering new concepts and ideas that need to be incorporated
• Challenge a theory by exploring an outlier case that doesn’t fit with established assumptions

To ensure that your analysis of the case has a solid academic grounding, you should conduct a literature review of sources related to the topic and develop a theoretical framework . This means identifying key concepts and theories to guide your analysis and interpretation.

There are many different research methods you can use to collect data on your subject. Case studies tend to focus on qualitative data using methods such as interviews, observations, and analysis of primary and secondary sources (e.g., newspaper articles, photographs, official records). Sometimes a case study will also collect quantitative data .

The aim is to gain as thorough an understanding as possible of the case and its context.

In writing up the case study, you need to bring together all the relevant aspects to give as complete a picture as possible of the subject.

How you report your findings depends on the type of research you are doing. Some case studies are structured like a standard scientific paper or thesis, with separate sections or chapters for the methods , results , and discussion .

Others are written in a more narrative style, aiming to explore the case from various angles and analyse its meanings and implications (for example, by using textual analysis or discourse analysis ).

In all cases, though, make sure to give contextual details about the case, connect it back to the literature and theory, and discuss how it fits into wider patterns or debates.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, January 30). Case Study | Definition, Examples & Methods. Scribbr. Retrieved 13 May 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/case-studies/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, correlational research | guide, design & examples, a quick guide to experimental design | 5 steps & examples, descriptive research design | definition, methods & examples.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Table of Contents

A case study is a research method that involves an in-depth examination and analysis of a particular phenomenon or case, such as an individual, organization, community, event, or situation.

It is a qualitative research approach that aims to provide a detailed and comprehensive understanding of the case being studied. Case studies typically involve multiple sources of data, including interviews, observations, documents, and artifacts, which are analyzed using various techniques, such as content analysis, thematic analysis, and grounded theory. The findings of a case study are often used to develop theories, inform policy or practice, or generate new research questions.

Types of Case Study

Types and Methods of Case Study are as follows:

Single-Case Study

A single-case study is an in-depth analysis of a single case. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to understand a specific phenomenon in detail.

For Example , A researcher might conduct a single-case study on a particular individual to understand their experiences with a particular health condition or a specific organization to explore their management practices. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of a single-case study are often used to generate new research questions, develop theories, or inform policy or practice.

Multiple-Case Study

A multiple-case study involves the analysis of several cases that are similar in nature. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to identify similarities and differences between the cases.

For Example, a researcher might conduct a multiple-case study on several companies to explore the factors that contribute to their success or failure. The researcher collects data from each case, compares and contrasts the findings, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as comparative analysis or pattern-matching. The findings of a multiple-case study can be used to develop theories, inform policy or practice, or generate new research questions.

Exploratory Case Study

An exploratory case study is used to explore a new or understudied phenomenon. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to generate hypotheses or theories about the phenomenon.

For Example, a researcher might conduct an exploratory case study on a new technology to understand its potential impact on society. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as grounded theory or content analysis. The findings of an exploratory case study can be used to generate new research questions, develop theories, or inform policy or practice.

Descriptive Case Study

A descriptive case study is used to describe a particular phenomenon in detail. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to provide a comprehensive account of the phenomenon.

For Example, a researcher might conduct a descriptive case study on a particular community to understand its social and economic characteristics. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of a descriptive case study can be used to inform policy or practice or generate new research questions.

Instrumental Case Study

An instrumental case study is used to understand a particular phenomenon that is instrumental in achieving a particular goal. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to understand the role of the phenomenon in achieving the goal.

For Example, a researcher might conduct an instrumental case study on a particular policy to understand its impact on achieving a particular goal, such as reducing poverty. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of an instrumental case study can be used to inform policy or practice or generate new research questions.

Case Study Data Collection Methods

Here are some common data collection methods for case studies:

Interviews involve asking questions to individuals who have knowledge or experience relevant to the case study. Interviews can be structured (where the same questions are asked to all participants) or unstructured (where the interviewer follows up on the responses with further questions). Interviews can be conducted in person, over the phone, or through video conferencing.

Observations

Observations involve watching and recording the behavior and activities of individuals or groups relevant to the case study. Observations can be participant (where the researcher actively participates in the activities) or non-participant (where the researcher observes from a distance). Observations can be recorded using notes, audio or video recordings, or photographs.

Documents can be used as a source of information for case studies. Documents can include reports, memos, emails, letters, and other written materials related to the case study. Documents can be collected from the case study participants or from public sources.

Surveys involve asking a set of questions to a sample of individuals relevant to the case study. Surveys can be administered in person, over the phone, through mail or email, or online. Surveys can be used to gather information on attitudes, opinions, or behaviors related to the case study.

Artifacts are physical objects relevant to the case study. Artifacts can include tools, equipment, products, or other objects that provide insights into the case study phenomenon.

How to conduct Case Study Research

Conducting a case study research involves several steps that need to be followed to ensure the quality and rigor of the study. Here are the steps to conduct case study research:

• Define the research questions: The first step in conducting a case study research is to define the research questions. The research questions should be specific, measurable, and relevant to the case study phenomenon under investigation.
• Select the case: The next step is to select the case or cases to be studied. The case should be relevant to the research questions and should provide rich and diverse data that can be used to answer the research questions.
• Collect data: Data can be collected using various methods, such as interviews, observations, documents, surveys, and artifacts. The data collection method should be selected based on the research questions and the nature of the case study phenomenon.
• Analyze the data: The data collected from the case study should be analyzed using various techniques, such as content analysis, thematic analysis, or grounded theory. The analysis should be guided by the research questions and should aim to provide insights and conclusions relevant to the research questions.
• Draw conclusions: The conclusions drawn from the case study should be based on the data analysis and should be relevant to the research questions. The conclusions should be supported by evidence and should be clearly stated.
• Validate the findings: The findings of the case study should be validated by reviewing the data and the analysis with participants or other experts in the field. This helps to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings.
• Write the report: The final step is to write the report of the case study research. The report should provide a clear description of the case study phenomenon, the research questions, the data collection methods, the data analysis, the findings, and the conclusions. The report should be written in a clear and concise manner and should follow the guidelines for academic writing.

Examples of Case Study

Here are some examples of case study research:

• The Hawthorne Studies : Conducted between 1924 and 1932, the Hawthorne Studies were a series of case studies conducted by Elton Mayo and his colleagues to examine the impact of work environment on employee productivity. The studies were conducted at the Hawthorne Works plant of the Western Electric Company in Chicago and included interviews, observations, and experiments.
• The Stanford Prison Experiment: Conducted in 1971, the Stanford Prison Experiment was a case study conducted by Philip Zimbardo to examine the psychological effects of power and authority. The study involved simulating a prison environment and assigning participants to the role of guards or prisoners. The study was controversial due to the ethical issues it raised.
• The Challenger Disaster: The Challenger Disaster was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion in 1986. The study included interviews, observations, and analysis of data to identify the technical, organizational, and cultural factors that contributed to the disaster.
• The Enron Scandal: The Enron Scandal was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the Enron Corporation’s bankruptcy in 2001. The study included interviews, analysis of financial data, and review of documents to identify the accounting practices, corporate culture, and ethical issues that led to the company’s downfall.
• The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster : The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the nuclear accident that occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan in 2011. The study included interviews, analysis of data, and review of documents to identify the technical, organizational, and cultural factors that contributed to the disaster.

Application of Case Study

Case studies have a wide range of applications across various fields and industries. Here are some examples:

Business and Management

Case studies are widely used in business and management to examine real-life situations and develop problem-solving skills. Case studies can help students and professionals to develop a deep understanding of business concepts, theories, and best practices.

Case studies are used in healthcare to examine patient care, treatment options, and outcomes. Case studies can help healthcare professionals to develop critical thinking skills, diagnose complex medical conditions, and develop effective treatment plans.

Case studies are used in education to examine teaching and learning practices. Case studies can help educators to develop effective teaching strategies, evaluate student progress, and identify areas for improvement.

Social Sciences

Case studies are widely used in social sciences to examine human behavior, social phenomena, and cultural practices. Case studies can help researchers to develop theories, test hypotheses, and gain insights into complex social issues.

Law and Ethics

Case studies are used in law and ethics to examine legal and ethical dilemmas. Case studies can help lawyers, policymakers, and ethical professionals to develop critical thinking skills, analyze complex cases, and make informed decisions.

Purpose of Case Study

The purpose of a case study is to provide a detailed analysis of a specific phenomenon, issue, or problem in its real-life context. A case study is a qualitative research method that involves the in-depth exploration and analysis of a particular case, which can be an individual, group, organization, event, or community.

The primary purpose of a case study is to generate a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the case, including its history, context, and dynamics. Case studies can help researchers to identify and examine the underlying factors, processes, and mechanisms that contribute to the case and its outcomes. This can help to develop a more accurate and detailed understanding of the case, which can inform future research, practice, or policy.

Case studies can also serve other purposes, including:

• Illustrating a theory or concept: Case studies can be used to illustrate and explain theoretical concepts and frameworks, providing concrete examples of how they can be applied in real-life situations.
• Developing hypotheses: Case studies can help to generate hypotheses about the causal relationships between different factors and outcomes, which can be tested through further research.
• Providing insight into complex issues: Case studies can provide insights into complex and multifaceted issues, which may be difficult to understand through other research methods.
• Informing practice or policy: Case studies can be used to inform practice or policy by identifying best practices, lessons learned, or areas for improvement.

Advantages of Case Study Research

There are several advantages of case study research, including:

• In-depth exploration: Case study research allows for a detailed exploration and analysis of a specific phenomenon, issue, or problem in its real-life context. This can provide a comprehensive understanding of the case and its dynamics, which may not be possible through other research methods.
• Rich data: Case study research can generate rich and detailed data, including qualitative data such as interviews, observations, and documents. This can provide a nuanced understanding of the case and its complexity.
• Holistic perspective: Case study research allows for a holistic perspective of the case, taking into account the various factors, processes, and mechanisms that contribute to the case and its outcomes. This can help to develop a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the case.
• Theory development: Case study research can help to develop and refine theories and concepts by providing empirical evidence and concrete examples of how they can be applied in real-life situations.
• Practical application: Case study research can inform practice or policy by identifying best practices, lessons learned, or areas for improvement.
• Contextualization: Case study research takes into account the specific context in which the case is situated, which can help to understand how the case is influenced by the social, cultural, and historical factors of its environment.

Limitations of Case Study Research

There are several limitations of case study research, including:

• Limited generalizability : Case studies are typically focused on a single case or a small number of cases, which limits the generalizability of the findings. The unique characteristics of the case may not be applicable to other contexts or populations, which may limit the external validity of the research.
• Biased sampling: Case studies may rely on purposive or convenience sampling, which can introduce bias into the sample selection process. This may limit the representativeness of the sample and the generalizability of the findings.
• Subjectivity: Case studies rely on the interpretation of the researcher, which can introduce subjectivity into the analysis. The researcher’s own biases, assumptions, and perspectives may influence the findings, which may limit the objectivity of the research.
• Limited control: Case studies are typically conducted in naturalistic settings, which limits the control that the researcher has over the environment and the variables being studied. This may limit the ability to establish causal relationships between variables.
• Time-consuming: Case studies can be time-consuming to conduct, as they typically involve a detailed exploration and analysis of a specific case. This may limit the feasibility of conducting multiple case studies or conducting case studies in a timely manner.
• Resource-intensive: Case studies may require significant resources, including time, funding, and expertise. This may limit the ability of researchers to conduct case studies in resource-constrained settings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Questionnaire – Definition, Types, and Examples

Observational Research – Methods and Guide

Quantitative Research – Methods, Types and...

Qualitative Research Methods

Explanatory Research – Types, Methods, Guide

Survey Research – Types, Methods, Examples

Qualitative Research: An Introduction to Methods and Designs by

Get full access to Qualitative Research: An Introduction to Methods and Designs and 60K+ other titles, with a free 10-day trial of O'Reilly.

There are also live events, courses curated by job role, and more.

Characteristics of a Case Study

Although case study research may be applied to many settings for many reasons, in this chapter we will focus on its use in illuminating educational and social programs. Program case study designs begin by identifying the specific program to be investigated followed by the selection of specific aspects that will be thoroughly studied. Unless very small and uncomplicated, most programs cannot be studied in their entirety. The selected program elements are then clarified using research questions that will guide the actual case study. Answering these questions through several forms of data collection becomes the principal task of the case study researcher.

Bounding the Case

Case study research involves the exploration ...

Get Qualitative Research: An Introduction to Methods and Designs now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.

Don’t leave empty-handed

Get Mark Richards’s Software Architecture Patterns ebook to better understand how to design components—and how they should interact.

It’s yours, free.

Check it out now on O’Reilly

Dive in for free with a 10-day trial of the O’Reilly learning platform—then explore all the other resources our members count on to build skills and solve problems every day.

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

What the Case Study Method Really Teaches

• Nitin Nohria

Seven meta-skills that stick even if the cases fade from memory.

It’s been 100 years since Harvard Business School began using the case study method. Beyond teaching specific subject matter, the case study method excels in instilling meta-skills in students. This article explains the importance of seven such skills: preparation, discernment, bias recognition, judgement, collaboration, curiosity, and self-confidence.

During my decade as dean of Harvard Business School, I spent hundreds of hours talking with our alumni. To enliven these conversations, I relied on a favorite question: “What was the most important thing you learned from your time in our MBA program?”

• Nitin Nohria is the George F. Baker Professor of Business Administration, Distinguished University Service Professor, and former dean of Harvard Business School.

Partner Center

Case Study Method Definition, Characteristics, Stages & Sources

Introduction case study method of data collection.

The credit of introducing case study method  goes to Frederic Leplay, an English philosopher. Herbert Spencer adopted it and Healey was the first who supported this method and studied Juvenile Delinquency. Later on sociologists, Anthropologists, Ethnologists and other researcher were interested in the study of various cultures by case study method.

Meaning of Case Study

A case study is a comprehensive study of a social unit of society, which may be a person, family group, institution, community or event. A case study focuses attention on a single unit thoroughly. The aim is that to find out the influencing factors of a social unit and the relationship between these factors and a social unit.

Definitions of Case Study Method

• P.V. Young. Case study is a comprehensive study of a social unit, be it a person, a group of persons, an institution, a community or a family.
• Groode and Hatt. it is a method of exploring and analyzing the life of a social unit.
• C.H. Cooley. Case study depends our perception and gives clear insight into life directory.
• Johoda. Case study is a small inclusive and intensive study of an individual in which investigators brings to bear their skills and method.

Keeping the above definitions in view we conclude that case study is a method of studying a social unit and its aspects deeply and thoroughly.

Characteristics of Case Study

Following are the characteristics

• The number of unit to be studied is small.
• It studies a social unit deeply and thoroughly.
• It is qualitative as well as quantitative.
• It covers sufficient wide cycle of time.
• It has continuity in nature.

Stages in a Case Study Method of Data Collection

The techniques and processes of a case study method are given as following.

• Choice of a case or selection of a problem.
• Description of the events.
• Factors influencing study.
• Data processing.
• Data recording.

Sources of Data for Case Study

• Personal documents, viz diaries, memories, autobiographies, letters etc of the researcher.
• Qualification and interest of the researcher.
• Life history of the respondents.
• Motives and objectives of the study.

Related Articles

What is Informal Organization, Characteristics of Informal Organization

Understanding Case Study Method in Research: A Comprehensive Guide

Table of Contents

Have you ever wondered how researchers uncover the nuanced layers of individual experiences or the intricate workings of a particular event? One of the keys to unlocking these mysteries lies in the qualitative research focusing on a single subject in its real-life context.">case study method , a research strategy that might seem straightforward at first glance but is rich with complexity and insightful potential. Let’s dive into the world of case studies and discover why they are such a valuable tool in the arsenal of research methods.

What is a Case Study Method?

At its core, the case study method is a form of qualitative research that involves an in-depth, detailed examination of a single subject, such as an individual, group, organization, event, or phenomenon. It’s a method favored when the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident, and where multiple sources of data are used to illuminate the case from various perspectives. This method’s strength lies in its ability to provide a comprehensive understanding of the case in its real-life context.

Historical Context and Evolution of Case Studies

Case studies have been around for centuries, with their roots in medical and psychological research. Over time, their application has spread to disciplines like sociology, anthropology, business, and education. The evolution of this method has been marked by a growing appreciation for qualitative data and the rich, contextual insights it can provide, which quantitative methods may overlook.

Characteristics of Case Study Research

What sets the case study method apart are its distinct characteristics:

• Intensive Examination: It provides a deep understanding of the case in question, considering the complexity and uniqueness of each case.
• Contextual Analysis: The researcher studies the case within its real-life context, recognizing that the context can significantly influence the phenomenon.
• Multiple Data Sources: Case studies often utilize various data sources like interviews, observations, documents, and reports, which provide multiple perspectives on the subject.
• Participant’s Perspective: This method often focuses on the perspectives of the participants within the case, giving voice to those directly involved.

Types of Case Studies

There are different types of case studies, each suited for specific research objectives:

• Exploratory: These are conducted before large-scale research projects to help identify questions, select measurement constructs, and develop hypotheses.
• Descriptive: These involve a detailed, in-depth description of the case, without attempting to determine cause and effect.
• Explanatory: These are used to investigate cause-and-effect relationships and understand underlying principles of certain phenomena.
• Intrinsic: This type is focused on the case itself because the case presents an unusual or unique issue.
• Instrumental: Here, the case is secondary to understanding a broader issue or phenomenon.
• Collective: These involve studying a group of cases collectively or comparably to understand a phenomenon, population, or general condition.

The Process of Conducting a Case Study

Conducting a case study involves several well-defined steps:

• Defining Your Case: What or who will you study? Define the case and ensure it aligns with your research objectives.
• Selecting Participants: If studying people, careful selection is crucial to ensure they fit the case criteria and can provide the necessary insights.
• Data Collection: Gather information through various methods like interviews, observations, and reviewing documents.
• Data Analysis: Analyze the collected data to identify patterns, themes, and insights related to your research question.
• Reporting Findings: Present your findings in a way that communicates the complexity and richness of the case study, often through narrative.

Case Studies in Practice: Real-world Examples

Case studies are not just academic exercises; they have practical applications in every field. For instance, in business, they can explore consumer behavior or organizational strategies. In psychology, they can provide detailed insight into individual behaviors or conditions. Education often uses case studies to explore teaching methods or learning difficulties.

Advantages of Case Study Research

While the case study method has its critics, it offers several undeniable advantages:

• Rich, Detailed Data: It captures data too complex for quantitative methods.
• Contextual Insights: It provides a better understanding of the phenomena in its natural setting.
• Contribution to Theory: It can generate and refine theory, offering a foundation for further research.

Limitations and Criticism

However, it’s important to acknowledge the limitations and criticisms:

• Generalizability : Findings from case studies may not be widely generalizable due to the focus on a single case.
• Subjectivity: The researcher’s perspective may influence the study, which requires careful reflection and transparency.
• Time-Consuming: They require a significant amount of time to conduct and analyze properly.

Concluding Thoughts on the Case Study Method

The case study method is a powerful tool that allows researchers to delve into the intricacies of a subject in its real-world environment. While not without its challenges, when executed correctly, the insights garnered can be incredibly valuable, offering depth and context that other methods may miss. Robert K\. Yin ’s advocacy for this method underscores its potential to illuminate and explain contemporary phenomena, making it an indispensable part of the researcher’s toolkit.

Reflecting on the case study method, how do you think its application could change with the advancements in technology and data analytics? Could such a traditional method be enhanced or even replaced in the future?

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Submit Comment

Research Methods in Psychology

1 Introduction to Psychological Research – Objectives and Goals, Problems, Hypothesis and Variables

• Nature of Psychological Research
• The Context of Discovery
• Context of Justification
• Characteristics of Psychological Research
• Goals and Objectives of Psychological Research

2 Introduction to Psychological Experiments and Tests

• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Extraneous Variables
• Experimental and Control Groups
• Introduction of Test
• Types of Psychological Test
• Uses of Psychological Tests

3 Steps in Research

• Research Process
• Identification of the Problem
• Review of Literature
• Formulating a Hypothesis
• Identifying Manipulating and Controlling Variables
• Formulating a Research Design
• Constructing Devices for Observation and Measurement
• Sample Selection and Data Collection
• Data Analysis and Interpretation
• Hypothesis Testing
• Drawing Conclusion

4 Types of Research and Methods of Research

• Historical Research
• Descriptive Research
• Correlational Research
• Qualitative Research
• Ex-Post Facto Research
• True Experimental Research
• Quasi-Experimental Research

5 Definition and Description Research Design, Quality of Research Design

• Research Design
• Purpose of Research Design
• Design Selection
• Criteria of Research Design
• Qualities of Research Design

6 Experimental Design (Control Group Design and Two Factor Design)

• Experimental Design
• Control Group Design
• Two Factor Design

7 Survey Design

• Survey Research Designs
• Steps in Survey Design
• Structuring and Designing the Questionnaire
• Interviewing Methodology
• Data Analysis
• Final Report

8 Single Subject Design

• Single Subject Design: Definition and Meaning
• Phases Within Single Subject Design
• Requirements of Single Subject Design
• Characteristics of Single Subject Design
• Types of Single Subject Design
• Advantages of Single Subject Design
• Disadvantages of Single Subject Design

9 Observation Method

• Definition and Meaning of Observation
• Characteristics of Observation
• Types of Observation
• Advantages and Disadvantages of Observation
• Guides for Observation Method

10 Interview and Interviewing

• Definition of Interview
• Types of Interview
• Aspects of Qualitative Research Interviews
• Interview Questions
• Convergent Interviewing as Action Research
• Research Team

11 Questionnaire Method

• Definition and Description of Questionnaires
• Types of Questionnaires
• Purpose of Questionnaire Studies
• Designing Research Questionnaires
• The Methods to Make a Questionnaire Efficient
• The Types of Questionnaire to be Included in the Questionnaire
• Advantages and Disadvantages of Questionnaire
• When to Use a Questionnaire?

12 Case Study

• Definition and Description of Case Study Method
• Historical Account of Case Study Method
• Designing Case Study
• Requirements for Case Studies
• Guideline to Follow in Case Study Method
• Other Important Measures in Case Study Method
• Case Reports

13 Report Writing

• Purpose of a Report
• Writing Style of the Report
• Report Writing – the Do’s and the Don’ts
• Format for Report in Psychology Area
• Major Sections in a Report

14 Review of Literature

• Purposes of Review of Literature
• Sources of Review of Literature
• Types of Literature
• Writing Process of the Review of Literature
• Preparation of Index Card for Reviewing and Abstracting

15 Methodology

• Definition and Purpose of Methodology
• Participants (Sample)
• Apparatus and Materials

16 Result, Analysis and Discussion of the Data

• Definition and Description of Results
• Statistical Presentation
• Tables and Figures

17 Summary and Conclusion

• Summary Definition and Description
• Guidelines for Writing a Summary
• Writing the Summary and Choosing Words
• A Process for Paraphrasing and Summarising
• Summary of a Report
• Writing Conclusions

18 References in Research Report

• Reference List (the Format)
• References (Process of Writing)
• Reference List and Print Sources
• Electronic Sources
• Book on CD Tape and Movie
• Reference Specifications
• General Guidelines to Write References

Share on Mastodon

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Best Family Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

What Is a Case Study?

Weighing the pros and cons of this method of research

Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Cara Lustik is a fact-checker and copywriter.

Verywell / Colleen Tighe

• Pros and Cons

What Types of Case Studies Are Out There?

Where do you find data for a case study, how do i write a psychology case study.

A case study is an in-depth study of one person, group, or event. In a case study, nearly every aspect of the subject's life and history is analyzed to seek patterns and causes of behavior. Case studies can be used in many different fields, including psychology, medicine, education, anthropology, political science, and social work.

The point of a case study is to learn as much as possible about an individual or group so that the information can be generalized to many others. Unfortunately, case studies tend to be highly subjective, and it is sometimes difficult to generalize results to a larger population.

While case studies focus on a single individual or group, they follow a format similar to other types of psychology writing. If you are writing a case study, we got you—here are some rules of APA format to reference.  

At a Glance

A case study, or an in-depth study of a person, group, or event, can be a useful research tool when used wisely. In many cases, case studies are best used in situations where it would be difficult or impossible for you to conduct an experiment. They are helpful for looking at unique situations and allow researchers to gather a lot of˜ information about a specific individual or group of people. However, it's important to be cautious of any bias we draw from them as they are highly subjective.

What Are the Benefits and Limitations of Case Studies?

A case study can have its strengths and weaknesses. Researchers must consider these pros and cons before deciding if this type of study is appropriate for their needs.

One of the greatest advantages of a case study is that it allows researchers to investigate things that are often difficult or impossible to replicate in a lab. Some other benefits of a case study:

• Allows researchers to capture information on the 'how,' 'what,' and 'why,' of something that's implemented
• Gives researchers the chance to collect information on why one strategy might be chosen over another
• Permits researchers to develop hypotheses that can be explored in experimental research

On the other hand, a case study can have some drawbacks:

• It cannot necessarily be generalized to the larger population
• Cannot demonstrate cause and effect
• It may not be scientifically rigorous
• It can lead to bias

Researchers may choose to perform a case study if they want to explore a unique or recently discovered phenomenon. Through their insights, researchers develop additional ideas and study questions that might be explored in future studies.

It's important to remember that the insights from case studies cannot be used to determine cause-and-effect relationships between variables. However, case studies may be used to develop hypotheses that can then be addressed in experimental research.

Case Study Examples

There have been a number of notable case studies in the history of psychology. Much of  Freud's work and theories were developed through individual case studies. Some great examples of case studies in psychology include:

• Anna O : Anna O. was a pseudonym of a woman named Bertha Pappenheim, a patient of a physician named Josef Breuer. While she was never a patient of Freud's, Freud and Breuer discussed her case extensively. The woman was experiencing symptoms of a condition that was then known as hysteria and found that talking about her problems helped relieve her symptoms. Her case played an important part in the development of talk therapy as an approach to mental health treatment.
• Phineas Gage : Phineas Gage was a railroad employee who experienced a terrible accident in which an explosion sent a metal rod through his skull, damaging important portions of his brain. Gage recovered from his accident but was left with serious changes in both personality and behavior.
• Genie : Genie was a young girl subjected to horrific abuse and isolation. The case study of Genie allowed researchers to study whether language learning was possible, even after missing critical periods for language development. Her case also served as an example of how scientific research may interfere with treatment and lead to further abuse of vulnerable individuals.

Such cases demonstrate how case research can be used to study things that researchers could not replicate in experimental settings. In Genie's case, her horrific abuse denied her the opportunity to learn a language at critical points in her development.

This is clearly not something researchers could ethically replicate, but conducting a case study on Genie allowed researchers to study phenomena that are otherwise impossible to reproduce.

There are a few different types of case studies that psychologists and other researchers might use:

• Collective case studies : These involve studying a group of individuals. Researchers might study a group of people in a certain setting or look at an entire community. For example, psychologists might explore how access to resources in a community has affected the collective mental well-being of those who live there.
• Descriptive case studies : These involve starting with a descriptive theory. The subjects are then observed, and the information gathered is compared to the pre-existing theory.
• Explanatory case studies : These   are often used to do causal investigations. In other words, researchers are interested in looking at factors that may have caused certain things to occur.
• Exploratory case studies : These are sometimes used as a prelude to further, more in-depth research. This allows researchers to gather more information before developing their research questions and hypotheses .
• Instrumental case studies : These occur when the individual or group allows researchers to understand more than what is initially obvious to observers.
• Intrinsic case studies : This type of case study is when the researcher has a personal interest in the case. Jean Piaget's observations of his own children are good examples of how an intrinsic case study can contribute to the development of a psychological theory.

The three main case study types often used are intrinsic, instrumental, and collective. Intrinsic case studies are useful for learning about unique cases. Instrumental case studies help look at an individual to learn more about a broader issue. A collective case study can be useful for looking at several cases simultaneously.

The type of case study that psychology researchers use depends on the unique characteristics of the situation and the case itself.

There are a number of different sources and methods that researchers can use to gather information about an individual or group. Six major sources that have been identified by researchers are:

• Archival records : Census records, survey records, and name lists are examples of archival records.
• Direct observation : This strategy involves observing the subject, often in a natural setting . While an individual observer is sometimes used, it is more common to utilize a group of observers.
• Documents : Letters, newspaper articles, administrative records, etc., are the types of documents often used as sources.
• Interviews : Interviews are one of the most important methods for gathering information in case studies. An interview can involve structured survey questions or more open-ended questions.
• Participant observation : When the researcher serves as a participant in events and observes the actions and outcomes, it is called participant observation.
• Physical artifacts : Tools, objects, instruments, and other artifacts are often observed during a direct observation of the subject.

If you have been directed to write a case study for a psychology course, be sure to check with your instructor for any specific guidelines you need to follow. If you are writing your case study for a professional publication, check with the publisher for their specific guidelines for submitting a case study.

Here is a general outline of what should be included in a case study.

Section 1: A Case History

This section will have the following structure and content:

Background information : The first section of your paper will present your client's background. Include factors such as age, gender, work, health status, family mental health history, family and social relationships, drug and alcohol history, life difficulties, goals, and coping skills and weaknesses.

Description of the presenting problem : In the next section of your case study, you will describe the problem or symptoms that the client presented with.

Describe any physical, emotional, or sensory symptoms reported by the client. Thoughts, feelings, and perceptions related to the symptoms should also be noted. Any screening or diagnostic assessments that are used should also be described in detail and all scores reported.

Your diagnosis : Provide your diagnosis and give the appropriate Diagnostic and Statistical Manual code. Explain how you reached your diagnosis, how the client's symptoms fit the diagnostic criteria for the disorder(s), or any possible difficulties in reaching a diagnosis.

Section 2: Treatment Plan

This portion of the paper will address the chosen treatment for the condition. This might also include the theoretical basis for the chosen treatment or any other evidence that might exist to support why this approach was chosen.

• Cognitive behavioral approach : Explain how a cognitive behavioral therapist would approach treatment. Offer background information on cognitive behavioral therapy and describe the treatment sessions, client response, and outcome of this type of treatment. Make note of any difficulties or successes encountered by your client during treatment.
• Humanistic approach : Describe a humanistic approach that could be used to treat your client, such as client-centered therapy . Provide information on the type of treatment you chose, the client's reaction to the treatment, and the end result of this approach. Explain why the treatment was successful or unsuccessful.
• Psychoanalytic approach : Describe how a psychoanalytic therapist would view the client's problem. Provide some background on the psychoanalytic approach and cite relevant references. Explain how psychoanalytic therapy would be used to treat the client, how the client would respond to therapy, and the effectiveness of this treatment approach.
• Pharmacological approach : If treatment primarily involves the use of medications, explain which medications were used and why. Provide background on the effectiveness of these medications and how monotherapy may compare with an approach that combines medications with therapy or other treatments.

This section of a case study should also include information about the treatment goals, process, and outcomes.

When you are writing a case study, you should also include a section where you discuss the case study itself, including the strengths and limitiations of the study. You should note how the findings of your case study might support previous research. 

In your discussion section, you should also describe some of the implications of your case study. What ideas or findings might require further exploration? How might researchers go about exploring some of these questions in additional studies?

Need More Tips?

Here are a few additional pointers to keep in mind when formatting your case study:

• Never refer to the subject of your case study as "the client." Instead, use their name or a pseudonym.
• Read examples of case studies to gain an idea about the style and format.
• Remember to use APA format when citing references .

Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach .  BMC Med Res Methodol . 2011;11:100.

Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2011 Jun 27;11:100. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Gagnon, Yves-Chantal.  The Case Study as Research Method: A Practical Handbook . Canada, Chicago Review Press Incorporated DBA Independent Pub Group, 2010.

Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods . United States, SAGE Publications, 2017.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Jump to navigation

Cochrane Training

Chapter 9: summarizing study characteristics and preparing for synthesis.

Joanne E McKenzie, Sue E Brennan, Rebecca E Ryan, Hilary J Thomson, Renea V Johnston

Key Points:

• Synthesis is a process of bringing together data from a set of included studies with the aim of drawing conclusions about a body of evidence. This will include synthesis of study characteristics and, potentially, statistical synthesis of study findings.
• A general framework for synthesis can be used to guide the process of planning the comparisons, preparing for synthesis, undertaking the synthesis, and interpreting and describing the results.
• Tabulation of study characteristics aids the examination and comparison of PICO elements across studies, facilitates synthesis of these characteristics and grouping of studies for statistical synthesis.
• Tabulation of extracted data from studies allows assessment of the number of studies contributing to a particular meta-analysis, and helps determine what other statistical synthesis methods might be used if meta-analysis is not possible.

Cite this chapter as: McKenzie JE, Brennan SE, Ryan RE, Thomson HJ, Johnston RV. Chapter 9: Summarizing study characteristics and preparing for synthesis. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane, 2023. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook .

9.1 Introduction

Synthesis is a process of bringing together data from a set of included studies with the aim of drawing conclusions about a body of evidence. Most Cochrane Reviews on the effects of interventions will include some type of statistical synthesis. Most commonly this is the statistical combination of results from two or more separate studies (henceforth referred to as meta-analysis) of effect estimates.

An examination of the included studies always precedes statistical synthesis in Cochrane Reviews. For example, examination of the interventions studied is often needed to itemize their content so as to determine which studies can be grouped in a single synthesis. More broadly, synthesis of the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome) elements of the included studies underpins interpretation of review findings and is an important output of the review in its own right. This synthesis should encompass the characteristics of the interventions and comparators in included studies, the populations and settings in which the interventions were evaluated, the outcomes assessed, and the strengths and weaknesses of the body of evidence.

Chapter 2 defined three types of PICO criteria that may be helpful in understanding decisions that need to be made at different stages in the review:

• The review PICO (planned at the protocol stage) is the PICO on which eligibility of studies is based (what will be included and what excluded from the review).
• The PICO for each synthesis (also planned at the protocol stage) defines the question that the specific synthesis aims to answer, determining how the synthesis will be structured, specifying planned comparisons (including intervention and comparator groups, any grouping of outcome and population subgroups).
• The PICO of the included studies (determined at the review stage) is what was actually investigated in the included studies.

In this chapter, we focus on the PICO for each synthesis and the PICO of the included studies , as the basis for determining which studies can be grouped for statistical synthesis and for synthesizing study characteristics. We describe the preliminary steps undertaken before performing the statistical synthesis. Methods for the statistical synthesis are described in Chapter 10 , Chapter 11 and Chapter 12 .

9.2 A general framework for synthesis

Box 9.2.a A general framework for synthesis that can be applied irrespective of the methods used to synthesize results

Box 9.2.a provides a general framework for synthesis that can be applied irrespective of the methods used to synthesize results. Planning for the synthesis should start at protocol-writing stage, and Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 describe the steps involved in planning the review questions and comparisons between intervention groups. These steps included specifying which characteristics of the interventions, populations, outcomes and study design would be grouped together for synthesis (the PICO for each synthesis: stage 1 in Box 9.2.a ).

This chapter primarily concerns stage 2 of the general framework in Box 9.2.a . After deciding which studies will be included in the review and extracting data, review authors can start implementing their plan, working through steps 2.1 to 2.5 of the framework. This process begins with a detailed examination of the characteristics of each study (step 2.1), and then comparison of characteristics across studies in order to determine which studies are similar enough to be grouped for synthesis (step 2.2). Examination of the type of data available for synthesis follows (step 2.3). These three steps inform decisions about whether any modification to the planned comparisons or outcomes is necessary, or new comparisons are needed (step 2.4). The last step of the framework covered in this chapter involves synthesis of the characteristics of studies contributing to each comparison (step 2.5). The chapter concludes with practical tips for checking data before synthesis (Section 9.4 ).

Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 2.5 involve analysis and synthesis of mainly qualitative information about study characteristics. The process used to undertake these steps is rarely described in reviews, yet can require many subjective decisions about the nature and similarity of the PICO elements of the included studies. The examples described in this section illustrate approaches for making this process more transparent.

9.3 Preliminary steps of a synthesis

9.3.1 summarize the characteristics of each study (step 2.1).

A starting point for synthesis is to summarize the PICO characteristics of each study (i.e. the PICO of the included studies, see Chapter 3 ) and categorize these PICO elements in the groups (or domains) pre-specified in the protocol (i.e. the PICO for each synthesis). The resulting descriptions are reported in the ‘Characteristics of included studies’ table, and are used in step 2.2 to determine which studies can be grouped for synthesis.

In some reviews, the labels and terminology used in each study are retained when describing the PICO elements of the included studies. This may be sufficient in areas with consistent and widely understood terminology that matches the PICO for each synthesis. However, in most areas, terminology is variable, making it difficult to compare the PICO of each included study to the PICO for each synthesis, or to compare PICO elements across studies. Standardizing the description of PICO elements across studies facilitates these comparisons. This standardization includes applying the labels and terminology used to articulate the PICO for each synthesis ( Chapter 3 ), and structuring the description of PICO elements. The description of interventions can be structured using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDIeR) checklist, for example (see Chapter 3 and Table 9.3.a ).

Table 9.3.a illustrates the use of pre-specified groups to categorize and label interventions in a review of psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in pregnancy (Chamberlain et al 2017). The main intervention strategy in each study was categorized into one of six groups: counselling, health education, feedback, incentive-based interventions, social support, and exercise. This categorization determined which studies were eligible for each comparison (e.g. counselling versus usual care; single or multi-component strategy). The extract from the ‘Characteristics of included studies’ table shows the diverse descriptions of interventions in three of the 54 studies for which the main intervention was categorized as ‘counselling’. Other intervention characteristics, such as duration and frequency, were coded in pre-specified categories to standardize description of the intervention intensity and facilitate meta-regression (not shown here).

Table 9.3.a Example of categorizing interventions into pre-defined groups

* The definition also specified eligible modes of delivery, intervention duration and personnel.

While this example focuses on categorizing and describing interventions according to groups pre-specified in the PICO for each synthesis, the same approach applies to other PICO elements.

9.3.2 Determine which studies are similar enough to be grouped within each comparison (step 2.2)

Once the PICO of included studies have been coded using labels and descriptions specified in the PICO for each synthesis, it will be possible to compare PICO elements across studies and determine which studies are similar enough to be grouped within each comparison.

Tabulating study characteristics can help to explore and compare PICO elements across studies, and is particularly important for reviews that are broad in scope, have diversity across one or more PICO elements, or include large numbers of studies. Data about study characteristics can be ordered in many different ways (e.g. by comparison or by specific PICO elements), and tables may include information about one or more PICO elements. Deciding on the best approach will depend on the purpose of the table and the stage of the review. A close examination of study characteristics will require detailed tables; for example, to identify differences in characteristics that were pre-specified as potentially important modifiers of the intervention effects. As the review progresses, this detail may be replaced by standardized description of PICO characteristics (e.g. the coding of counselling interventions presented in Table 9.3.a ).

Table 9.3.b illustrates one approach to tabulating study characteristics to enable comparison and analysis across studies. This table presents a high-level summary of the characteristics that are most important for determining which comparisons can be made. The table was adapted from tables presented in a review of self-management education programmes for osteoarthritis (Kroon et al 2014). The authors presented a structured summary of intervention and comparator groups for each study, and then categorized intervention components thought to be important for enabling patients to manage their own condition. Table 9.3.b shows selected intervention components, the comparator, and outcomes measured in a subset of studies (some details are fictitious). Outcomes have been grouped by the outcome domains ‘Pain’ and ‘Function’ (column ‘Outcome measure’ Table 9.3.b ). These pre-specified outcome domains are the chosen level for the synthesis as specified in the PICO for each synthesis. Authors will need to assess whether the measurement methods or tools used within each study provide an appropriate assessment of the domains ( Chapter 3, Section 3.2.4 ). A next step is to group each measure into the pre-specified time points. In this example, outcomes are grouped into short-term (<6 weeks) and long-term follow-up (≥6 weeks to 12 months) (column ‘Time points (time frame)’ Table 9.3.b ).

Variations on the format shown in Table 9.3.b can be presented within a review to summarize the characteristics of studies contributing to each synthesis, which is important for interpreting findings (step 2.5).

Table 9.3.b Table of study characteristics illustrating similarity of PICO elements across studies

BEH = health-directed behaviour; CON = constructive attitudes and approaches; EMO = emotional well-being; ENG = positive and active engagement in life; MON = self-monitoring and insight; NAV = health service navigation; SKL = skill and technique acquisition. ANCOVA = Analysis of covariance; CI = confidence interval; IQR = interquartile range; MD = mean difference; SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error, NS = non-significant. Pain and function measures: Dutch AIMS-SF = Dutch short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales; HAQ = Health Assessment Questionnaire; VAS = visual analogue scale; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. 1 Ordered by type of comparator; 2 Short-term (denoted ‘immediate’ in the review Kroon et al (2014)) follow-up is defined as <6 weeks, long-term follow-up (denoted ‘intermediate’ in the review) is ≥6 weeks to 12 months; 3 For simplicity, in this example the available data are assumed to be the same for all outcomes within an outcome domain within a study. In practice, this is unlikely and the available data would likely vary by outcome; 4 Indicates that an effect estimate and its standard error may be computed through imputation of missing statistics, methods to convert between statistics (e.g. medians to means) or contact with study authors. *Indicates the selected outcome when there was multiplicity in the outcome domain and time frame.

9.3.3 Determine what data are available for synthesis (step 2.3)

Once the studies that are similar enough to be grouped together within each comparison have been determined, a next step is to examine what data are available for synthesis. Tabulating the measurement tools and time frames as shown in Table 9.3.b allows assessment of the potential for multiplicity (i.e. when multiple outcomes within a study and outcome domain are available for inclusion ( Chapter 3, Section 3.2.4.3 )). In this example, multiplicity arises in two ways. First, from multiple measurement instruments used to measure the same outcome domain within the same time frame (e.g. ‘Short-term Pain’ is measured using the ‘Pain VAS’ and ‘Pain on walking VAS’ scales in study 3). Second, from multiple time points measured within the same time frame (e.g. ‘Short-term Pain’ is measured using ‘Pain VAS’ at both 2 weeks and 1 month in study 6). Pre-specified methods to deal with the multiplicity can then be implemented (see Table 9.3.c for examples of approaches for dealing with multiplicity). In this review, the authors pre-specified a set of decision rules for selecting specific outcomes within the outcome domains. For example, for the outcome domain ‘Pain’, the selected outcome was the highest on the following list: global pain, pain on walking, WOMAC pain subscore, composite pain scores other than WOMAC, pain on activities other than walking, rest pain or pain during the night. The authors further specified that if there were multiple time points at which the outcome was measured within a time frame, they would select the longest time point. The selected outcomes from applying these rules to studies 3 and 6 are indicated by an asterisk in Table 9.3.b .

Table 9.3.b also illustrates an approach to tabulating the extracted data. The available statistics are tabulated in the column labelled ‘Data’, from which an assessment can be made as to whether the study contributes the required data for a meta-analysis (column ‘Effect & SE’) ( Chapter 10 ). For example, of the seven studies comparing health-directed behaviour (BEH) with usual care, six measured ‘Short-term Pain’, four of which contribute required data for meta-analysis. Reordering the table by comparison, outcome and time frame, will more readily show the number of studies that will contribute to a particular meta-analysis, and help determine what other synthesis methods might be used if the data available for meta-analysis are limited.

Table 9.3.c Examples of approaches for selecting one outcome (effect estimate) for inclusion in a synthesis.* Adapted from López-López et al (2018)

9.3.4 Determine if modification to the planned comparisons or outcomes is necessary, or new comparisons are needed (step 2.4)

The previous steps may reveal the need to modify the planned comparisons. Important variations in the intervention may be identified leading to different or modified intervention groups. Few studies or sparse data, or both, may lead to different groupings of interventions, populations or outcomes. Planning contingencies for anticipated scenarios is likely to lead to less post-hoc decision making ( Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 ); however, it is difficult to plan for all scenarios. In the latter circumstance, the rationale for any post-hoc changes should be reported. This approach was adopted in a review examining the effects of portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Hollands et al 2015). After preliminary examination of the outcome data, the review authors changed their planned intervention groups. They judged that intervention groups based on ‘size’ and those based on ‘shape’ of the products were not conceptually comparable, and therefore should form separate comparisons. The authors provided a rationale for the change and noted that it was a post-hoc decision.

9.3.5 Synthesize the characteristics of the studies contributing to each comparison (step 2.5)

A final step, and one that is essential for interpreting combined effects, is to synthesize the characteristics of studies contributing to each comparison. This description should integrate information about key PICO characteristics across studies, and identify any potentially important differences in characteristics that were pre-specified as possible effect modifiers. The synthesis of study characteristics is also needed for GRADE assessments, informing judgements about whether the evidence applies directly to the review question (indirectness) and analyses conducted to examine possible explanations for heterogeneity (inconsistency) (see Chapter 14 ).

Tabulating study characteristics is generally preferable to lengthy description in the text, since the structure imposed by a table can make it easier and faster for readers to scan and identify patterns in the information presented. Table 9.3.b illustrates one such approach. Tabulating characteristics of studies that contribute to each comparison can also help to improve the transparency of decisions made around grouping of studies, while also ensuring that studies that do not contribute to the combined effect are accounted for.

9.4 Checking data before synthesis

Before embarking on a synthesis, it is important to be confident that the findings from the individual studies have been collated correctly. Therefore, review authors must compare the magnitude and direction of effects reported by studies with how they are to be presented in the review. This is a reasonably straightforward way for authors to check a number of potential problems, including typographical errors in studies’ reports, accuracy of data collection and manipulation, and data entry into RevMan. For example, the direction of a standardized mean difference may accidentally be wrong in the review. A basic check is to ensure the same qualitative findings (e.g. direction of effect and statistical significance) between the data as presented in the review and the data as available from the original study.

Results in forest plots should agree with data in the original report (point estimate and confidence interval) if the same effect measure and statistical model is used. There are legitimate reasons for differences, however, including: using a different measure of intervention effect; making different choices between change-from-baseline measures, post-intervention measures alone or post-intervention measures adjusted for baseline values; grouping similar intervention groups; or making adjustments for unit-of-analysis errors in the reports of the primary studies.

9.5 Types of synthesis

The focus of this chapter has been describing the steps involved in implementing the planned comparisons between intervention groups (stage 2 of the general framework for synthesis ( Box 9.2.a )). The next step (stage 3) is often performing a statistical synthesis. Meta-analysis of effect estimates, and its extensions have many advantages. There are circumstances under which a meta-analysis is not possible, however, and other statistical synthesis methods might be considered, so as to make best use of the available data. Available summary and synthesis methods, along with the questions they address and examples of associated plots, are described in Table 9.5.a . Chapter 10 and Chapter 11 discuss meta-analysis (of effect estimate) methods, while Chapter 12 focuses on the other statistical synthesis methods, along with approaches to tabulating, visually displaying and providing a structured presentation of the findings. An important part of planning the analysis strategy is building in contingencies to use alternative methods when the desired method cannot be used.

Table 9.5.a Overview of available methods for summary and synthesis

9.6 Chapter information

Authors: Joanne E McKenzie, Sue E Brennan, Rebecca E Ryan, Hilary J Thomson, Renea V Johnston

Acknowledgements: Sections of this chapter build on Chapter 9 of version 5.1 of the Handbook , with editors Jonathan Deeks, Julian Higgins and Douglas Altman. We are grateful to Julian Higgins, James Thomas and Tianjing Li for commenting helpfully on earlier drafts.

Funding: JM is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (1143429). SB and RR’s positions are supported by the NHMRC Cochrane Collaboration Funding Program. HT is funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12017-13 and MC_UU_12017-15) and Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office (SPHSU13 and SPHSU15). RJ’s position is supported by the NHMRC Cochrane Collaboration Funding Program and Cabrini Institute.

9.7 References

Chamberlain C, O’Mara-Eves A, Porter J, Coleman T, Perlen SM, Thomas J, McKenzie JE. Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017; 2 : CD001055.

Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Jebb SA, Lewis HB, Wei Y, Higgins JPT, Ogilvie D. Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 9 : CD011045.

Kroon FPB, van der Burg LRA, Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Johnston RV, Pitt V. Self-management education programmes for osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014; 1 : CD008963.

López-López JA, Page MJ, Lipsey MW, Higgins JPT. Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods 2018; 9 : 336–351.

For permission to re-use material from the Handbook (either academic or commercial), please see here for full details.

Research Methods and Design

• Action Research
• Case Study Design
• Literature Review
• Quantitative Research Methods
• Qualitative Research Methods
• Mixed Methods Study
• Indigenous Research and Ethics This link opens in a new window
• Identifying Empirical Research Articles This link opens in a new window
• Research Ethics and Quality
• Data Literacy
• Get Help with Writing Assignments

a research strategy whose characteristics include

• a focus on the interrelationships that constitute the context of a specific entity (such as an organization, event, phenomenon, or person),
• analysis of the relationship between the contextual factors and the entity being studied, and
• the explicit purpose of using those insights (of the interactions between contextual relationships and the entity in question) to generate theory and/or contribute to extant theory. 

SAGE Research Methods Videos

What is the value of working with case studies.

Professor Todd Landman explains how case studies can be used in research. He discusses the importance of choosing a case study correctly and warns about limitations of case study research.

This is just one segment in a series about case studies. You can find the rest of the series in our SAGE database, Research Methods:

Videos covering research methods and statistics

Further Reading

• << Previous: Action Research
• Next: Literature Review >>
• Last Updated: May 7, 2024 9:51 AM

CityU Home - CityU Catalog

Evaluating Local Government Policy Innovations

A case study of surabaya's efforts in combating stunting and enhancing public health services quality.

• Deasy Arieffiani Universitas Hang Tuah
• Mas Roro Lilik Ekowanti Public Administration Department, Hang Tuah University, Surabaya, Indonesia

This research aims to evaluate regional innovations in implementing Surabaya City government policies to reduce stunting rates and improve the quality of public health services. A qualitative descriptive method was used with a case study approach involving field observations and structured interviews. The research results show the success of Posyandu Prima in reducing stunting rates significantly in the last two years. The Surabaya City Government has proven effective in managing this program's human resources and budget. The active involvement of Great Surabaya Cadres (KSH) and non-governmental organizations also contributed greatly to the program's success. Cross-sector collaboration plays an important role in supporting implementation. Institutional characteristics, such as commitment to public health and ability to collaborate, also matter. Theoretically, this research shows that synergy between the parties involved and government commitment can achieve significant results in handling the stunting problem. In conclusion, the Prima Posyandu Program has proven successful in reducing stunting rates and improving the quality of public health services in Surabaya. Additionally, the collaborative efforts between community stakeholders, healthcare providers, and governmental bodies underscore the crucial role of multi-sectoral partnerships in addressing complex public health issues like stunting. This synergy fosters comprehensive approaches that combine local knowledge, resources, and policy support to effectively combat stunting and enhance the well-being of communities. Thus, the Prima Posyandu Program's success is a compelling example of how concerted action and sustained commitment can yield tangible improvements in population health outcomes.

Adair, L. S., Carba, D. B., Lee, N. R., & Borja, J. B. (2021). Stunting, IQ, and Final School Attainment in the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey Birth Cohort. Economics & Human Biology, 42, 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2021.100999

Aditri, F., Sufyan, D. L., & Puspareni, L. D. (2022). Policy Implementation Strategy of West Bandung District Health Office in Stunting Intervention During COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Global Nutrition, 1(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.53823/jgn.v1i2.24

Adnyana, S. (2014). Perbedaan Status Gizi Balita Berdasarkan Frekuensi Kunjungan ke Posyandu dan Tingkat Pengetahuan Ibu di Desa Bungaya Kecamatan Bebandem Kabupaten Karangasem Provinsi Bali. Jurnal Bina Praja, 6(3), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.06.2014.221-226

Anggraini, T., & Melin Wula, H. V. (2021). Governmental Performance in Integrated Stunting Countermeasures in Border Regions: Evidence from Timur Tengah Utara Regency. Jurnal Studi Sosial dan Politik, 5(2), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v5i2.9561

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Bhutta, Z. A., Akseer, N., Keats, E. C., Vaivada, T., Baker, S., Horton, S. E., Katz, J., Menon, P., Piwoz, E., Shekar, M., Victora, C., & Black, R. (2020). How Countries Can Reduce Child Stunting at Scale: Lessons From Exemplar Countries. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 112, 894S-904S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa153

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and Implementing Cross-Sector Collaborations: Needed and Challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Daniel, D., Qaimamunazzala, H., Prawira, J., Siantoro, A., Sirait, M., Tanaboleng, Y. B., & Padmawati, R. S. (2023). Interactions of Factors Related to the Stunting Reduction Program in Indonesia: A Case Study in Ende District. International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services, 53(3), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938231156024

Elmighrabi, N. F., Fleming, C. A. K., & Agho, K. E. (2024). Factors Associated with Childhood Stunting in Four North African Countries: Evidence from Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys, 2014–2019. Nutrients, 16(4), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16040473

Erlyn, P., Hidayat, B. A., Fatoni, A., & Saksono, H. (2021). Nutritional Interventions by Local Governments as an Effort to Accelerate Stunting Reduction. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.543-553

Essa, W. Y., Nurfindarti, E., & Ruhyana, N. F. (2021). Strategies for Handling Stunting in Bandung City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.15-28

Fatahillah, R. E. P., & Noviyanti. (2023). Analisis Survei Kepuasan Masyarakat pada Pelayanan Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak (KIA) di Puskesmas Gayungan Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Inovasi Administrasi Negara Terapan, 1(1), 178–190. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/innovant/article/view/25898

Ferguson, L. C., & Clark, T. N. (1979). The Policy Predicament: Making and Implementing Public Policy by George C. Edwards and Ira Sharkansky. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989886

Habimana, J. de D., Uwase, A., Korukire, N., Jewett, S., Umugwaneza, M., Rugema, L., & Munyanshongore, C. (2023). Prevalence and Correlates of Stunting among Children Aged 6–23 Months from Poor Households in Rwanda. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054068

Halik, A. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Pelimpahan Urusan Pemerintahan Lingkup Kementerian Dalam Negeri. Jurnal Bina Praja, 7(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.07.2015.131-148

Iryani, R. Y., Maulidiah, S., Rahman, K., Prihatin, P. S., & Febrian, R. A. (2022). Capacity of Community Government in Convergence Stunting Prevention in Sinaboi Countries Sinaboika District, Rokan Hilir District. International Journal of Health Sciences, 619–638. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.5595

Jeyakumar, A., Godbharle, S., & Giri, B. R. (2021). Determinants of Anthropometric Failure Among Tribal Children Younger than 5 Years of Age in Palghar, Maharashtra, India. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 42(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0379572120970836

Kwami, C. S., Godfrey, S., Gavilan, H., Lakhanpaul, M., & Parikh, P. (2019). Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: Linkages with Stunting in Rural Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), 3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203793

Lacey, A., & Luff, D. (2009). Qualitative Data Analysis. The NIHR RDS for the East Midlands/Yorkshire & the Humber.

Macella, A. D. R., Mardhiah, N., & Handayani, S. W. (2022). A Study of Leadership Innovation in Stunting Prevention and Handling in Simeulue, Aceh Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v1i1.39

Media, Y. (2014). Kualitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Ibu Hamil dan Bersalin di Daerah Terpencil (Studi Kasus di Nagari Batu Bajanjang, Kabupaten Solok, Provinsi Sumatera Barat). Jurnal Bina Praja, 6(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.06.2014.21-30

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE.

Mwita, F. C., PrayGod, G., Sanga, E., Setebe, T., Joseph, G., Kunzi, H., Webster, J., Gladstone, M., Searle, R., Ahmed, M., Hokororo, A., Filteau, S., Friis, H., Briend, A., & Olsen, M. F. (2024). Developmental and Nutritional Changes in Children with Severe Acute Malnutrition Provided with n-3 Fatty Acids Improved Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food and Psychosocial Support: A Pilot Study in Tanzania. Nutrients, 16(5), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050692

Nadeak, H. (2014). Implementasi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2008 tentang Kecamatan. Jurnal Bina Praja, 6(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.06.2014.183-195

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2023, February 16). Program Pemkot Surabaya “Posyandu Prima” Dijadikan Percontohan Nasional. Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. https://surabaya.go.id/id/berita/72605/program-pemkot-surabaya-posyandu-prima-dijadikan-percontohan-nasional

Prasetyo, A., Noviana, N., Rosdiana, W., Anwar, M. A., Hartiningsih, Hendrixon, Harwijayanti, B. P., & Fahlevi, M. (2023). Stunting Convergence Management Framework through System Integration Based on Regional Service Governance. Sustainability, 15(3), 1821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031821

Rahman, S. A., Amran, A., Ahmad, N. H., & Khadijeh Taghizadeh, S. (2019). The Contrasting Role of Government and NGO Support Towards the Entrepreneurs at Base of Pyramid and Effect on Subjective Wellbeing. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 31(4), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1498261

Rustikawati, K., Setyowati, D., & Herawati, N. (2019). Sistem Informasi Geografis Status Gizi Buruk Balita di Dinas Kesehatan Kota Yogyakarta Berbasis Mobile Android. Jurnal Teknologi, 12(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.3415/JURTEK.V12I2.2703

Sekretariat Percepatan Pencegahan Stunting. (2019). Strategi Nasional Percepatan Pencegahan Anak Kerdil (Stunting). Sekretariat Percepatan Pencegahan Stunting.

Setyawan, D., Priantono, A., & Firdausi, F. (2021). George Edward III Model. Publicio: Jurnal Ilmiah Politik, Kebijakan dan Sosial, 3(2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.51747/publicio.v3i2.774

Sirait, F. E. T. (2021). Policy Communication and the Solidity of the Jokowi’s Second Term Coalition in Handling Covid-19. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(2), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.257-268

Siswati, T., Iskandar, S., Pramestuti, N., Raharjo, J., Rubaya, A. K., & Wiratama, B. S. (2022). Impact of an Integrative Nutrition Package through Home Visit on Maternal and Children Outcome: Finding from Locus Stunting in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Nutrients, 14(16), 3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14163448

Suratri, M. A. L., Putro, G., Rachmat, B., Nurhayati, Ristrini, Pracoyo, N. E., Yulianto, A., Suryatma, A., Samsudin, M., & Raharni. (2023). Risk Factors for Stunting among Children under Five Years in the Province of East Nusa Tenggara (NTT), Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021640

swaranews.com. (2023, January 26). Prevalensi Stunting Surabaya Terendah se-Indonesia. Swaranews.com. https://swaranews.com/baca-4764-prevalensi-stunting-surabaya-terendah-se-indonesia

Tamrin, M. H. (2017). Interaksi Aktor Kebijakan dalam Pengelolaan Wilayah Jembatan Suramadu dalam Perspektif Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik), 5(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.21070/jkmp.v5i2.1312

Tamrin, M. H., & Lubis, L. (2023). Pengelolaan KEE Ujung Pangkah Melalui Kolaborasi Stakeholders. Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup.

Tarmizi, S. N. (2023, January 25). Prevalensi Stunting di Indonesia Turun ke 21,6% dari 24,4%. Sehat Negeriku. https://sehatnegeriku.kemkes.go.id/baca/rilis-media/20230125/3142280/prevalensi-stunting-di-indonesia-turun-ke-216-dari-244/

Taufiqurokhman, T. (2023). Equality Strategy for Reducing Stunting Prevalence Rate: Case Study of DKI Jakarta Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(3), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.495-506

Titaley, C. R., Ariawan, I., Hapsari, D., Muasyaroh, A., & Dibley, M. J. (2019). Determinants of the Stunting of Children Under Two Years Old in Indonesia: A Multilevel Analysis of the 2013 Indonesia Basic Health Survey. Nutrients, 11(5), 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11051106

Umiyati, S., & Tamrin, M. H. (2021). Penta Helix Synergy in Halal Tourism Development. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020–Social, Humanity, and Education (ICoSIHESS 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210120.108

Utami, T., Kosasih, K., & Sayidin, R. (2023). Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation of Stunting Reduction in Penajam Paser Utara District in 2021. Journal on Education, 5(4), 13218–13227. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2322

Utami, W. A., Rikza, A., Anggresta, P., & Nuryananda, P. F. (2022). The Role of Institutional Collaboration Between Actors in Protecting the Economic Security of Indonesian Migrant Workers With Financial Literacy. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(2), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.373-383

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The Policy Implementation Process. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.

How to Cite

• Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Copyright (c) 2023 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .

Make a Submission

Manuscript Template

Accreditation Certificate

Download Certificate

Journal Policies

• Focus and Scope
• Section Policies
• Peer Review Process
• Publication Frequency
• Open Access Statement
• Article Processing Charges
• Plagiarism Check
• References Management
• Author Guidelines
• Copyright Notice and Licensing
• Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
• Crossmark Policy Page

Abstracting & Indexing

See complete lists

Citation Analysis

Collaboration

Domestic Policy Strategy Agency Ministry of Home Affairs

Jalan Kramat Raya Nomor 132 Jakarta Pusat DKI Jakarta - 10430

p-ISSN: 2085-4323 e-ISSN Elektronik: 2503-3360

DOI: 10.21787/jbp

Jurnal Bina Praja has been accredited by the Ministry of Research and Technology/Head of the National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia in SINTA 2 based on Decree Number 200/M/KPT/2020

Biology and management of wild lupine ( Lupinus perennis L.): a case study for conserving rare plants in edge habitat

• Published: 05 December 2023
• Volume 225 , pages 373–389, ( 2024 )

Cite this article

• Isabella R. Petitta 1 ,
• Margarita M. López-Uribe 1 , 2 &
• Autumn E. Sabo 1 , 3  

489 Accesses

23 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Wild lupine ( Lupinus perennis ) is a perennial plant originally found primarily throughout the United States and Canada in oak savannas, which are considered an ecotone between prairie and forest. Because of primary habitat loss, this early successional plant is declining and now persists in managed edge habitats such as power line rights-of-way and roadsides across much of its range. Many edge populations of wild lupine are small and isolated, which can hinder the reproduction of this pollinator-dependent plant. Here, we synthesize current literature about the biology and management of wild lupine and associated plants and insects. We also highlight current gaps of knowledge to guide future research on wild lupine and, more generally, on savanna-like habitats. The information provided here on lupine serves as a case study for how edge habitat conserves rare plant species reliant on disturbance. Overall, habitat characteristics that seem best for wild lupine include a gradient of canopy cover from moderate to open, well-drained soils, and a low abundance of understory woody plants. Land management, including prescribed burning, mowing, and mechanical thinning, can promote the conservation of wild lupine and other forest edge plants. However, additional research in regards to ideal management regimes and intensity is needed to further plant conservation in forest edge habitat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Compatibility of regeneration silviculture and wild ungulates in a mediterranean pine forest: implications for tree recruitment and woody plant diversity.

Traditional prescribed burning of coastal heathland provides niches for xerophilous and sun-loving beetles

Callery pear invasion in prairie restorations is predicted by proximity to forest edge, not species richness

Abella SR, Jaeger JF, Brewer LG (2004) Fifteen years of plant community dynamics during a northwest Ohio oak savanna restoration. Mich Bot 43:117–127

Google Scholar  

Andruk CM, Schwope C, Fowler NL (2014) The joint effects of fire and herbivory on hardwood regeneration in central Texas woodlands. For Ecol Manag 334:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.037

Article   Google Scholar  

Asbjornsen H, Brudvig LA, Mabry CM, Evans CW, Karnitz HM (2005) Defining reference information for restoring ecologically rare tallgrass oak savannas in the Midwestern United States. J for 103:345–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/103.7.345

Baskin C, Baskin J (2014) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New York

Bassett TJ, Landis DA, Brudvig LA (2020) Effects of experimental prescribed fire and tree thinning on oak savanna understory plant communities and ecosystem structure. For Ecol Manag 464:118047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118047

Bazzaz FA (1996) Plants in changing environments: linking physiological, population, and community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Beligala DH, Michaels HJ, Devries M, Phuntumart V (2017) Multilocus sequence analysis of root nodule bacteria associated with Lupinus spp. and glycine max. Adv Microbiol 7:790–812. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2017.711063

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Belsky J, Joshi NK (2020) Effects of fungicide and herbicide chemical exposure on Apis and non-apis bees in agricultural landscape. Front Environ Sci 8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00081

Bernhardt CE, Mitchell RJ, Michaels HJ (2008) Effects of population size and density on pollinator visitation, pollinator behavior, and pollen tube abundance in Lupinus perennis . Int J Plant Sci 169:944–953. https://doi.org/10.1086/589698

Bowles M, McBride J, Semel B (1997) Restoration ecology of lupine ( Lupinus perennis ) in the North Unit of Illinois beach state park: two-year results. The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, p 19

Boyd DP, Gates CC (2006) A brief review of the status of plains bison in North America. J West 45:15–21

Bradshaw M, Braun U, Götz M, Jurick ΙΙW (2022) Phylogeny and taxonomy of powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe species on Lupinus hosts. Mycol 114:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2021.1973287

Brewer L, Vankat J (2004) Description of vegetation of the oak openings of Northwestern Ohio at the time of Euro-American settlement. Ohio J Science 104:76–85

Brokaw J, Portman ZM, Bruninga-Socolar B, Cariveau DP (2023) Prescribed fire increases the number of ground-nesting bee nests in tallgrass prairie remnants. Insect Conserv Divers 16:355–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12628

Brudvig LA, Asbjornsen H (2008) Patterns of oak regeneration in a midwestern savanna restoration experiment. For Ecol Manag 255:3019–3025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.017

Brudvig LA, Asbjornsen H (2009) The removal of woody encroachment restores biophysical gradients in Midwestern oak savannas. J Appl Ecol 46:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01590.x

Butler BJ (2008) Family forest owners of the United States 2006. US Department of Agriculture

Book   Google Scholar  

Confer JL, Pascoe SM (2003) Avian communities on utility rights-of-ways and other managed shrublands in the Northeastern United States. For Ecol Manag 185:193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00255-X

Conniff R (2014) Electric power rights of way: a new frontier for conservation. Yale Environ. 360 https://e360.yale.edu/features/electric_power_rights_of_way_a_new_frontier_for_conservation Accessed 5 May 2023

Costanza JK, Moody A (2011) Deciding where to burn: stakeholder priorities for prescribed burning of a fire-dependent ecosystem. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03897-160114

Côté SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay J-P, Dussault C, Waller DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:113–147. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105725

Craine JM, Tilman D, Wedin D, Reich P, Tjoelker M, Knops J (2002) Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species. Funct Ecol 16:563–574. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00660.x

Curtis JT (1959) The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

Eby S, Burkepile DE, Fynn RWS, Burns CE, Govender N, Hagenah N, Koerner SE, Matchett KJ, Thompson DI, Wilcox KR, Collins SL, Kirkman KP, Knapp AK, Smith MD (2014) Loss of a large grazer impacts savanna grassland plant communities similarly in North America and South Africa. Oecologia 175:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2895-9

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Engle DM, Bodine TN, Stritzke JF (2006) Woody plant community in the cross timbers over two decades of brush treatments. Rangel Ecol Manag 59:153–162. https://doi.org/10.2111/05-112R2.1

Erdős L, Gallé R, Körmöczi L, Bátori Z (2013) Species composition and diversity of natural forest edges: edge responses and local edge species. Commun Ecol 14:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.6

Erdős L, Krstonošić D, Kiss PJ, Bátori Z, Tölgyesi C, Škvorc Ž (2019) Plant composition and diversity at edges in a semi-natural forest–grassland mosaic. Plant Ecol 220:279–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-019-00913-4

Forrester JA, Leopold DJ, Hafner SD (2005) Maintaining critical habitat in a heavily managed landscape: effects of power line corridor management on Karner blue butterfly ( Lycaeides melissa samuelis ) habitat. Restor Ecol 13:488–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00061.x

Fothergill K, Tindall K, Cross C (2013) What is a host plant? Plants used by Languria mozardi Latreille 1807 (Coleoptera: Erotylidae: Languriinae): a review. Pan-Pac Entomol 89:43–59. https://doi.org/10.3956/2012-59.1

Franklin CMA, Harper KA, Clarke MJ (2021) Trends in studies of edge influence on vegetation at human-created and natural forest edges across time and space. Can J for Res 51:274–282. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0308

Frye JA (2012) The effect of deer browse on sundial lupine: implications for frosted elfins. Northeast Nat 19:421–430. https://doi.org/10.1656/045.019.0305

Gibbs JP, Smart LB, Newhouse AE, Leopold DJ (2012) A molecular and fitness evaluation of commercially available versus locally collected blue lupine Lupinus perennis L. seeds for use in ecosystem restoration efforts. Restor Ecol 20:456–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00809.x

Gifford NA, Campbell S, Dillon A (2020) Recovery of the Karner Blue ( Plebejus samuelis ) in the Albany Pine Bush Preserve, Albany, NY. News Lepidopterists Soc 62:156

Gifford NA, Campbell SP (2019) Blue blazes: in pursuit of a butterfly effect. Nat Hist 127:30–31

Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1991) Manual of vascular plants of Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, 2nd edn. Botanical Garden, New York

Glenny W, Runyon JB, Burkle LA (2022) A review of management actions on insect pollinators on public lands in the United States. Biodivers Conserv 31:1995–2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02399-5

Goergen EM, Chambers JC (2009) Influence of a native legume on soil N and plant response following prescribed fire in sagebrush steppe. Int J Wildland Fire 18:665. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08067

Gonzales EK, Clements DR (2010) Plant community biomass shifts in response to mowing and fencing in invaded oak meadows with non-native grasses and abundant ungulates. Restor Ecol 18:753–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00535.x

Govaert S, Meeussen C, Vanneste T, Bollmann K, Brunet J, Cousins SAO, Diekmann M, Graae BJ, Hedwall P-O, Heinken T, Iacopetti G, Lenoir J, Lindmo S, Orczewska A, Perring MP, Ponette Q, Plue J, Selvi F, Spicher F, Tolosano M, Vermeir P, Zellweger F, Verheyen K, Vangansbeke P, De Frenne P (2020) Edge influence on understorey plant communities depends on forest management. J Veg Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12844

Grigore M, Tramer E (1996) The short-term effect of fire on Lupinus perennis (L.). Nat Areas J 161:41–48

Grundel R, Dulin GS, Pavlovic NB (2020) Changes in conservation value from grasslands to savannas to forests: how a temperate canopy cover gradient affects butterfly community composition. PLoS ONE 15:e0234139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234139

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Grundel R, Jean RP, Frohnapple KJ, Gibbs J, Glowacki GA, Pavlovic NB (2011) A survey of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of the Indiana Dunes and Northwest Indiana, USA. J Kans Entomol Soc 84:105–138. https://doi.org/10.2317/JKES101027.1

Grundel R, Pavlovic NB, Sulzman CL (1998) The effect of canopy cover and seasonal change on host plant quality for the endangered Karner blue butterfly ( Lycaeides melissa samuelis). Oecologia 114:243–250

Haid DE (1967) Ecological comparison of a prairie ecosystem and a forest ecosystem. Eastern Illinois University, Charleston

Halpern SL (2005) Sources and consequences of seed size variation in Lupinus perennis (Fabaceae): adaptive and non-adaptive hypotheses. Am J Bot 92:205–213. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.2.205

Halvorson JJ, Smith JL, Franz EH (1991) Lupine influence on soil carbon, nitrogen and microbial activity in developing ecosystems at Mount St. Helens. Oecologia 87:162–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00325253

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Hanberry BB, Hansen MH (2015) Advancement of tree species across ecotonal borders into non-forested ecosystems. Acta Oecol 68:24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2015.07.002

Hanula JL, Ulyshen MD, Horn S (2016) Conserving pollinators in North American forests: a review. Nat Areas J 36:427–439. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.036.0409

Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen P-A (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19:768–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x

Heintzman RL, Titus JE, Zhu W (2015) Effects of roadside deposition on growth and pollutant accumulation by willow ( Salix miyabeana ). Water Air Soil Pollut 226:11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2270-9

Henderson SB, Johnston FH (2012) Measures of forest fire smoke exposure and their associations with respiratory health outcomes. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 12:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0b013e328353351f

Hess AN, Hess RJ, Hess JLM, Paulan B, Hess JAM (2014) American bison influences on lepidopteran and wild blue lupine distribution in an oak savanna landscape. J Insect Conserv 18:327–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9640-x

Hevner S (2001) Effects of multiple visits by pollinators to flowers on the reproduction of wild lupine. Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green

Holm H (2014) Pollinators of native plants: attract, observe and identify pollinators and beneficial insects with native plants. Pollination Press LLC

Houdeshell H, Friedrich RL, Philpott SM (2011) Effects of prescribed burning on ant nesting ecology in oak savannas. Am Midl Nat 166:98–111. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-166.1.98

Howe HF (1994) Response of early- and late-flowering plants to fire season in experimental prairies. Ecol Appl 4:121–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942122

Hufkens K, Scheunders P, Ceulemans R (2009) Ecotones in vegetation ecology: methodologies and definitions revisited. Ecol Res 24:977–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-009-0584-7

Jones C, Skrip MM, Seliger BJ, Jones S, Wakie T, Takeuchi Y, Petras V, Petrasova A, Meentemeyer RK (2022) Spotted lanternfly predicted to establish in California by 2033 without preventative management. Commun Biol 5:558. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03447-0

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Jones FR (1924) A mycorrhizal fungus in the roots of legumes and some other plants. J Agric Res 29:459–470

Jones RAC, McLean GD (1989) Virus diseases of lupins. Ann Appl Biol 114:609–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1989.tb03376.x

Kappler RH, Michaels HJ, Root KV (2012) Impact of seed predation by mice on wild lupine in and near oak savannas. Am Midl Nat 168:18–29. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-168.1.18

King R (2003) Habitat management for the Karner blue butterfly ( Lycaeides melissa samuelis ): evaluating the short-term consequences. Ecol Restor 21:101–106. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.21.2.101

Kollmann J, Buschor M (2002) Edges effects on seed predation by rodents in deciduous forests of northern Switzerland. Plant Ecol 164:249–261

Koyama A, Uchida K, Ozeki M, Iwasaki T, Nakahama N, Suka T (2021) Conservation of endangered and rare plants requires strategies additional to deer-proof fencing for conservation of sub-alpine plant diversity. Appl Veg Sci 24:e12553. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12553

Kurlovich BS (2002) Lupins: geography, classification, genetic resources and breeding. Intan, St. Petersburg

Kwilosz JR, Knutson RL (1999) Prescribed fire management of Karner blue butterfly habitat at Indiana dunes national lakeshore. Nat Areas J 19:98–108

Lanterman J, Reeher P, Mitchell RJ, Goodell K (2019) Habitat preference and phenology of nest seeking and foraging spring bumble bee queens in Northeastern North America (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus). Am Midl Nat 182:131–159. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-182.2.131

Lee BR, Miller TK, Rosche C, Yang Y, Heberling JM, Kuebbing SE, Primack RB (2022) Wildflower phenological escape differs by continent and spring temperature. Nat Commun 13:7157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34936-9

Lee TD, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG (2003) Legume presence increases photosynthesis and N concentrations of co-occurring non-fixers but does not modulate their responsiveness to carbon dioxide enrichment. Oecologia 137:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1309-1

Lei SA (2010) Benefits and costs of vegetative and sexual reproduction in perennial plants: a review of literature. J Ariz-Nev Acad Sci 42:9–14. https://doi.org/10.2181/036.042.0103

Leimu R, Mutikainen P, Koricheva J, Fischer M (2006) How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94:942–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01150.x

Lettow MC, Brudvig LA, Bahlai CA, Gibbs J, Jean RP, Landis DA (2018) Bee community responses to a gradient of oak savanna restoration practices. Restor Ecol 26:882–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12655

Lettow MC, Brudvig LA, Bahlai CA, Landis DA (2014) Oak savanna management strategies and their differential effects on vegetative structure, understory light, and flowering forbs. For Ecol Manag 329:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.019

Lyth A, Spinaze A, Watson P, Johnston FH (2018) Place, human agency and community resilience—considerations for public health management of smoke from prescribed burning. Local Environ 23:975–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.1508205

MacDougall AS (2005) Responses of diversity and invasibility to burning in a northern oak savanna. Ecology 86:3354–3363. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1733

Mack RN, Simberloff D, Mark Lonsdale W, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2

Mackay WA, Davis TD, Sankhla D, Riemenschneider DE (1996) Factors influencing seed germination of Lupinus perennis . J Environ Hortic 14:167–169. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-14.4.167

Mahan C, Ross B, Yahner R (2020) The effects of integrated vegetation management on richness of native compatible flowering plants and abundance of noncompatible tree species on a right-of-way in central Pennsylvania, USA. Arboric Urban For 46:395–401. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2020.029

Maloney JN (1997) Oak savanna restoration techniques. Restor Reclam Rev 2:1–7

Maret MP, Wilson MV (2005) Fire and litter effects on seedling establishment in Western Oregon upland prairies. Restor Ecol 13:562–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00071.x

McCord JM, Harper CA, Greenberg CH (2014) Brood cover and food resources for wild turkeys following silvicultural treatments in mature upland hardwoods: effects of silviculture on wild turkey brood habitat. Wildl Soc Bull 38:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.403

McGrath Novak K, McCaffrey S, Schultz CA (2023) Comparing land manager and community perceptions of a Colorado prescribed fire outreach program. J for 121:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvac026

McShea WJ (2012) Ecology and management of white-tailed deer in a changing world: deer and eastern forests. Ann NY Acad Sci 1249:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06376.x

Mengoni Goñalons C, Farina WM (2018) Impaired associative learning after chronic exposure to pesticides in young adult honey bees. J Exp Biol 221:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.176644

Meyer R (2006) Lupinus perennis . In: Fire effects information system. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory Producer. https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/forb/lupper/all.html Accessed 5 May 2023

Michaels HJ, Cartwright CA, Wakeley Tomlinson EF (2019) Relationships among population size, environmental factors, and reproduction in Lupinus perennis (Fabaceae). Am Midl Nat 182:160. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-182.2.160

Michaels HJ, Shi XJ, Mitchell RJ (2008) Effects of population size on performance and inbreeding depression in Lupinus perennis . Oecologia 154:651–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0861-5

Migdał P, Roman A, Popiela-Pleban E, Kowalska-Góralska M, Opaliński S (2018) The impact of selected pesticides on honey bees. Pol J Environ Stud 27:787–792. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/74154

Miller S, Bratton S, Hadidian J (1992) Impacts of white-tailed deer on endangered and threatened vascular plants. Nat Areas J 12:67–73

Mola JM, Hemberger J, Kochanski J, Richardson LL, Pearse IS (2021) The importance of forests in bumble bee biology and conservation. BioSci 71:1234–1248. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab121

Moorhead LC, Souza L, Habeck CW, Lindroth RL, Classen AT (2017) Small mammal activity alters plant community composition and microbial activity in an old-field ecosystem. Ecosphere 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1777

Morris A (2020) Effects of flower color on pollination and seed production in Lupinus perennis . Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green

Moylett H, Youngsteadt E, Sorenson C (2020) The impact of prescribed burning on native bee communities (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) in longleaf pine savannas in the North Carolina sandhills. Environ Entomol 49:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvz156

Mueller NG, Spengler RN, Glenn A, Lama K (2021) Bison, anthropogenic fire, and the origins of agriculture in eastern North America. Anthr Rev 8:141–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019620961119

Nakahama N, Uchida K, Koyama A, Iwasaki T, Ozeki M, Suka T (2020) Construction of deer fences restores the diversity of butterflies and bumblebees as well as flowering plants in semi-natural grassland. Biodivers Conserv 29:2201–2215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01969-9

NatureServe (2023) NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. https://explorer.natureserve.org/ . Accessed 5 May 2023

Nicol F (2016) Canopy gaps are hotspots for bees and rare plants in an oak savannah-woodland system in southern Ontario. University of Guelph, Guelph

Noble SL, Bauer JT (2022) Canopy cover and canopy heterogeneity drive plant alpha diversity but not beta diversity in a Midwest oak savanna. Nat Areas J 42:242–251. https://doi.org/10.3375/21-55

Nowacki GJ, Abrams MD (2008) The demise of fire and “mesophication” of forests in the Eastern United States. BioSci 58:123–138. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580207

Nowak A, Nowak S (2006) Anthropogenic habitats can shelter threatened plants. In: Gafta D, Akeroyd J (eds) Nature conservation: concepts and practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 107–115

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Nuzzo VA (1986) Extent and status of Midwest oak savanna: presettlement and 1985. Nat Areas J 6:6–36

Nyamai PA, Aschenbach TA, Heslinga JL (2020) Restoration on private lands: a case study examining vegetation recruitment following restoration treatments in an oak-pine barrens ecosystem in Western Michigan, U.S.A. Am Midl Nat 184:149–162. https://doi.org/10.1637/0003-0031-184.2.149

Odanaka KA, Rehan SM (2020) Wild bee distribution near forested landscapes is dependent on successional state. For Ecosyst 7:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00241-4

O’Dell TE, Trappe JM (1992) Root endophytes of lupin and some other legumes in Northwestern USA. New Phytol 122:479–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb00076.x

Ondrasek G, Rathod S, Manohara KK, Gireesh C, Anantha MS, Sakhare AS, Parmar B, Yadav BK, Bandumula N, Raihan F, Zielińska-Chmielewska A, Meriño-Gergichevich C, Reyes-Díaz M, Khan A, Panfilova O, Seguel Fuentealba A, Romero SM, Nabil B, Wan C, Shepherd J, Horvatinec J (2022) Salt stress in plants and mitigation approaches. Plants 11:717. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11060717

Oswalt C, Olson M (2016) Description and distribution of oak forests across the Eastern United States. Managing Oak forests in the Eastern United States. CRC Press, Boca Raton

Palstra FP, Ruzzante DE (2008) Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: what can they tell us about the importance of genetic stochasticity for wild population persistence? Mol Ecol 17:3428–3447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03842.x

Partridge CG, Nyamai P, Hoskins A, Parks S (2023) Butterfly blues: population genetic assessment of wild lupine ( Lupinus perennis L.) in endangered Karner blue butterfly habitat around central-west Michigan. Botany 101:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2022-0107

Pascale EG, Thiet RK (2016) The relationship between ants and Lycaeides melissa samuelis (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) at concord pine barrens, NH, USA. Environ Entomol 45:633–641. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvw036

Pathikonda S, Ackleh AS, Hasenstein KH, Mopper S (2009) Invasion, disturbance, and competition: modeling the fate of coastal plant populations. Conserv Biol 23:164–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01073.x

Pavlovic NB (1994) Disturbance-dependent persistence of rare plants: anthropogenic impacts and restoration implications. In: Bowles ML, Whelan CJ (eds) Restoration of endangered species, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 159–193

Pavlovic NB, Grundel R (2009) Reintroduction of wild lupine ( Lupinus perennis L.) depends on variation in canopy, vegetation, and litter cover. Restor Ecol 17:807–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00417.x

Pavlovic NB, Leicht-young SA, Grundel R (2011) Short-term effects of burn season on flowering phenology of savanna plants. Plant Ecol 212:611–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9851-5

Pennsylvania Bureau of Forestry (2021) Resource Conservation Plan for Lupine ( Lupinus perennis ) in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Bureau of Forestry

Peterson DW, Reich PB (2001) Prescribed fire in oak savanna: fire frequency effects on stand structure and dynamics. Ecol Appl 11:914–927. https://doi.org/10.2307/3061125

Pfitsch WA, Williams EH (2009) Habitat restoration for lupine and specialist butterflies. Restor Ecol 17:226–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00370.x

Philippi J, Schliephake E, Jürgens H-U, Jansen G, Ordon F (2015) Feeding behavior of aphids on narrow-leafed lupin ( Lupinus angustifolius ) genotypes varying in the content of quinolizidine alkaloids. Entomol Exp Appl 156:37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12313

Plenzler MA, Michaels HJ (2015) Seedling recruitment and establishment of Lupinus perennis in a mixed-management landscape. Nat Areas J 35:224–234. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.035.0203

Püschel D, Janoušková M, Voříšková A, Gryndlerová H, Vosátka M, Jansa J (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhiza stimulates biological nitrogen fixation in two Medicago spp. through improved phosphorus acquisition. Front Plant Sci 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00390

Reinhardt JR, Nagel LM, Swanston CW, Keough H (2017) Community-level impacts of management and disturbance in Western Michigan oak savannas. Am Midl Nat 177:112–125. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-177.1.112

Rentch JS, Fortney RH, Stephenson SL, Adams HS, Grafton WN, Anderson JT (2005) Vegetation-site relationships of roadside plant communities in West Virginia, USA. J Appl Ecol 42:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00993.x

Rosen Z, Henery G, Slater KD, Sablan O, Ford B, Pierce JR, Fischer EV, Magzamen SL (2023) A culture of fire: identifying community risk perceptions surrounding prescribed burning in the Flint Hills, Kansas. J Appl Commun. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2455

Royo AA, Collins R, Adams MB, Kirschbaum C, Carson WP (2010) Pervasive interactions between ungulate browsers and disturbance regimes promote temperate forest herbaceous diversity. Ecology 91:93–105. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1680.1

Russell FL, Zippin DB, Fowler NL (2001) Effects of white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ) on plants, plant populations and communities: a review. Am Midl Nat 146:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2001)146[0001:EOWTDO]2.0.CO;2

Russell KN, Ikerd H, Droege S (2005) The potential conservation value of unmowed powerline strips for native bees. Biol Conserv 124:133–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.022

Russo L, Stout H, Roberts D, Ross BD, Mahan CG (2021) Powerline right-of-way management and flower-visiting insects: how vegetation management can promote pollinator diversity. PLoS ONE 16:e0245146. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245146

Shen X, Bourg NA, McShea WJ, Turner BL (2016) Long-term effects of white-tailed deer exclusion on the invasion of exotic plants: a case study in a Mid-Atlantic temperate forest. PLoS ONE 11:e0151825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151825

Sheridan PM, Orzell S, Bridges E (1999) Powerline easements as refugia for state rare seepage and pineland plant taxa. The sixth international symposium on environmental concerns in rights-of-way management pp. 451–460

Shi XJ, Michaels HJ, Mitchell RJ (2005) Effects of self-pollination and maternal resources on reproduction and offspring performance in the wild lupine, Lupinus perennis (Fabaceae). Sex Plant Reprod 18:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-005-0250-3

Shi YZ, Zhang XL, Su SX, Lan ZJ, Li K, Wang YM, Wang FY, Chan YL (2017) Mycorrhizal relationship in lupines: a review. Legum Res 40:965–973. https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v40i04.9013

Shimola J (2013) Impacts of a seed predator on sundial lupine. Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green

Smallidge PJ, Leopold DJ, Allen CM (1996) Community characteristics and vegetation management of Karner blue butterfly ( Lycaeides melissa samuelis ) habitats on rights-of-way in East-Central New York, USA. J Appl Ecol 33:1405–1419. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404780

Smith M, Turner M, Rusch D (2002) The effect of military training activity on eastern lupine and the Karner blue butterfly at Fort McCoy, Wisconsin, USA. Environ Manag 29:102–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-001-0044-9

Smith W, Miles P, Perry C, Pugh S (2009) Forest resources of the United States, 2007. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 78. https://doi.org/10.2737/WO-GTR-78

St. Mary M (2007) A study on the effectiveness of transplanting vs. seeding of Lupinus perennis in an oak savanna regeneration site. Thesis, Bowling Green State University

Straw EA, Carpentier EN, Brown MJF (2021) Roundup causes high levels of mortality following contact exposure in bumble bees. J Appl Ecol 58:1167–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13867

Sublett J Effects of seed coat variation and population on plant-microbial interactions. Thesis, Bowling Green State University

Sucoff E, Nichols T, Lu E-Y (2001) Herbicide effects on host plants of Karner blue butterfly and on butterfly development from egg to adult. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

Swanson ME, Franklin JF, Beschta RL, Crisafulli CM, DellaSala DA, Hutto RL, Lindenmayer DB, Swanson FJ (2011) The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front Ecol Environ 9:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1890/090157

Swengel AB, Swengel SR (2007) Benefit of permanent non-fire refugia for Lepidoptera conservation in fire-managed sites. J Insect Conserv 11:263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9042-9

Tangren SA, Frye CT (2020) Clover stem borer infestation in sundial lupine: recognition and consequences. Nat Areas J 40:121–128. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.040.0203

Tooke F, Battey NH (2010) Temperate flowering phenology. J Exp Bot 61:2853–2862. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq165

Trager MD, Wilson GWT, Hartnett DC (2004) Concurrent effects of fire regime, grazing and bison wallowing on tallgrass prairie vegetation. Am Midl Nat 152:237–247

Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14:18–30. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x

Trunschke J, Lunau K, Pyke GH, Ren Z-X, Wang H (2021) Flower color evolution and the evidence of pollinator-mediated selection. Front Plant Sci 12:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.617851

Turley NE, Biddinger DJ, Joshi NK, López-Uribe MM (2022) Six years of wild bee monitoring shows changes in biodiversity within and across years and declines in abundance. Ecol Evol 12:e9190. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9190

Urban-Mead KR, Muñiz P, Gillung J, Espinoza A, Fordyce R, van Dyke M, McArt SH, Danforth BN (2021) Bees in the trees: diverse spring fauna in temperate forest edge canopies. For Ecol Manag 482:118903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118903

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2003) Karner blue butterfly recovery plan. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota

U.S. Department of Energy (2017) Transforming The Nation’s Electricity System: The Second Installment Of The QER. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington DC, USA

van Lierop P, Lindquist E, Sathyapala S, Franceschini G (2015) Global forest area disturbance from fire, insect pests, diseases and severe weather events. For Ecol Manag 352:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.010

Vander Yacht AL, Barrioz SA, Keyser PD, Harper CA, Buckley DS, Buehler DA, Applegate RD (2017) Vegetation response to canopy disturbance and season of burn during oak woodland and savanna restoration in Tennessee. For Ecol Manag 390:187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.029

Vaughan MC, Hagan DL, Bridges WC, Dickinson MB, Coates TA (2021) How do fire behavior and fuel consumption vary between dormant and early growing season prescribed burns in the southern Appalachian Mountains? Fire Ecol 17:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-021-00108-1

Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x

von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2007) Long-distance dispersal of plants by vehicles as a driver of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 21:986–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00722.x

Wagner AS, Petersen SM, Carrino-Kyker S, Watson M, Burke DJ, Stuble KL (2023) Effect of deer and forest edge on understory plant communities. Nat Areas J 43:22–28. https://doi.org/10.3375/21-53

Wagner DL, Nelson MW, Schweitzer DF (2003) Shrubland Lepidoptera of southern New England and Southeastern New York: ecology, conservation, and management. For Ecol Manag 185:95–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00249-4

Walsh RP (2017) Microclimate and biotic interactions affect Karner blue butterfly occupancy and persistence in managed oak savanna habitats. J Insect Conserv 21:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-9967-1

Webster CR, Jenkins MA, Jose S (2006) Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the Eastern United States. J for 104:366–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/104.7.366

Weir JR, Bauman P, Cram D, Kreye JK, Baldwin C, Fawcett J, Treadwell M, Scasta JD (2020) Prescribed Fire: Understanding Liability, Laws and Risk. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service

Wilson GWT, Hartnett DC (1998) Interspecific variation in plant responses to mycorrhizal colonization in tallgrass prairie. Am J Bot 85:1732–1738. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446507

Wolf JJ (2004) Spatial Patterns of Canopy and Sub-canopy in Managed and Unmanaged Oak Savanna. Proc 19th North Am Prairie Conf 230–237

Zahran HH (1999) Rhizobium -legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:968–989. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.63.4.968-989.1999

Zaremba R, Pickering M (1994) Lupine Ecology and management in New York State. In: Andow, David A; Baker, Richard J; Lane, Cynthia P, eds. Karner blue butterfly: a symbol of a vanishing landscape. Miscellaneous Publication 84–1994. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: 87–93

Zhang J, Maun MA (1991) Effects of partial removal of seed reserves on some aspects of seedling ecology of seven dune species. Can J Bot 69:1457–1462. https://doi.org/10.1139/b91-188

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kelly Sitch, Andrew Rohrbaugh, Neil Gifford, Pat McElhenny, Brian Williamson, and Roy Brubaker for their land management insights. We also thank Claire Zimmerman of Mt. Cuba Center for information about wild lupine propagation. Thank you to Grace Gutierrez and Nash Turley for guidance on figure development. Finally, we thank editor, Dr. Karen Harper, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on our manuscript.

This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and McIntire-Stennis Appropriations under Project #PEN04785 and Accession #1027694 and the Pennsylvania’s Department of Conservation and Natural Resources’s Wild Resources Conservation Program Grant No. 21637. IRP was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE1255832. MMLU was supported by the USDA NIFA Appropriations Projects PEN04716 and PEN04620.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

Isabella R. Petitta, Margarita M. López-Uribe & Autumn E. Sabo

Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

Margarita M. López-Uribe

Biology Program, The Pennsylvania State University, Monaca, PA, USA

Autumn E. Sabo

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

IRP, MMLU, and AES conceived the paper. MMLU and AES secured funding. IRP developed the first draft, figures, table, and compiled literature. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Isabella R. Petitta or Autumn E. Sabo .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare that no relevant financial or personal relationships influenced the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Communicated by Karen Harper.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Petitta, I.R., López-Uribe, M.M. & Sabo, A.E. Biology and management of wild lupine ( Lupinus perennis L.): a case study for conserving rare plants in edge habitat. Plant Ecol 225 , 373–389 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01371-9

Download citation

Received : 01 June 2023

Accepted : 21 October 2023

Published : 05 December 2023

Issue Date : April 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01371-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Conservation
• Wild lupine ( Lupinus perennis )
• Oak savanna
• Edge habitat
• Prescribed fire

Advertisement

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Case Study Research Method in Psychology

Saul Mcleod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul Mcleod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

Case studies are in-depth investigations of a person, group, event, or community. Typically, data is gathered from various sources using several methods (e.g., observations & interviews).

The case study research method originated in clinical medicine (the case history, i.e., the patient’s personal history). In psychology, case studies are often confined to the study of a particular individual.

The information is mainly biographical and relates to events in the individual’s past (i.e., retrospective), as well as to significant events that are currently occurring in his or her everyday life.

The case study is not a research method, but researchers select methods of data collection and analysis that will generate material suitable for case studies.

Freud (1909a, 1909b) conducted very detailed investigations into the private lives of his patients in an attempt to both understand and help them overcome their illnesses.

This makes it clear that the case study is a method that should only be used by a psychologist, therapist, or psychiatrist, i.e., someone with a professional qualification.

There is an ethical issue of competence. Only someone qualified to diagnose and treat a person can conduct a formal case study relating to atypical (i.e., abnormal) behavior or atypical development.

 Famous Case Studies

• Anna O – One of the most famous case studies, documenting psychoanalyst Josef Breuer’s treatment of “Anna O” (real name Bertha Pappenheim) for hysteria in the late 1800s using early psychoanalytic theory.
• Little Hans – A child psychoanalysis case study published by Sigmund Freud in 1909 analyzing his five-year-old patient Herbert Graf’s house phobia as related to the Oedipus complex.
• Bruce/Brenda – Gender identity case of the boy (Bruce) whose botched circumcision led psychologist John Money to advise gender reassignment and raise him as a girl (Brenda) in the 1960s.
• Genie Wiley – Linguistics/psychological development case of the victim of extreme isolation abuse who was studied in 1970s California for effects of early language deprivation on acquiring speech later in life.
• Phineas Gage – One of the most famous neuropsychology case studies analyzes personality changes in railroad worker Phineas Gage after an 1848 brain injury involving a tamping iron piercing his skull.

Clinical Case Studies

• Studying the effectiveness of psychotherapy approaches with an individual patient
• Assessing and treating mental illnesses like depression, anxiety disorders, PTSD
• Neuropsychological cases investigating brain injuries or disorders

Child Psychology Case Studies

• Studying psychological development from birth through adolescence
• Cases of learning disabilities, autism spectrum disorders, ADHD
• Effects of trauma, abuse, deprivation on development

Types of Case Studies

• Explanatory case studies : Used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles. Helpful for doing qualitative analysis to explain presumed causal links.
• Exploratory case studies : Used to explore situations where an intervention being evaluated has no clear set of outcomes. It helps define questions and hypotheses for future research.
• Descriptive case studies : Describe an intervention or phenomenon and the real-life context in which it occurred. It is helpful for illustrating certain topics within an evaluation.
• Multiple-case studies : Used to explore differences between cases and replicate findings across cases. Helpful for comparing and contrasting specific cases.
• Intrinsic : Used to gain a better understanding of a particular case. Helpful for capturing the complexity of a single case.
• Collective : Used to explore a general phenomenon using multiple case studies. Helpful for jointly studying a group of cases in order to inquire into the phenomenon.

Where Do You Find Data for a Case Study?

There are several places to find data for a case study. The key is to gather data from multiple sources to get a complete picture of the case and corroborate facts or findings through triangulation of evidence. Most of this information is likely qualitative (i.e., verbal description rather than measurement), but the psychologist might also collect numerical data.

1. Primary sources

• Interviews – Interviewing key people related to the case to get their perspectives and insights. The interview is an extremely effective procedure for obtaining information about an individual, and it may be used to collect comments from the person’s friends, parents, employer, workmates, and others who have a good knowledge of the person, as well as to obtain facts from the person him or herself.
• Observations – Observing behaviors, interactions, processes, etc., related to the case as they unfold in real-time.
• Documents & Records – Reviewing private documents, diaries, public records, correspondence, meeting minutes, etc., relevant to the case.

2. Secondary sources

• News/Media – News coverage of events related to the case study.
• Academic articles – Journal articles, dissertations etc. that discuss the case.
• Government reports – Official data and records related to the case context.
• Books/films – Books, documentaries or films discussing the case.

3. Archival records

Searching historical archives, museum collections and databases to find relevant documents, visual/audio records related to the case history and context.

Public archives like newspapers, organizational records, photographic collections could all include potentially relevant pieces of information to shed light on attitudes, cultural perspectives, common practices and historical contexts related to psychology.

4. Organizational records

Organizational records offer the advantage of often having large datasets collected over time that can reveal or confirm psychological insights.

Of course, privacy and ethical concerns regarding confidential data must be navigated carefully.

However, with proper protocols, organizational records can provide invaluable context and empirical depth to qualitative case studies exploring the intersection of psychology and organizations.

• Organizational/industrial psychology research : Organizational records like employee surveys, turnover/retention data, policies, incident reports etc. may provide insight into topics like job satisfaction, workplace culture and dynamics, leadership issues, employee behaviors etc.
• Clinical psychology : Therapists/hospitals may grant access to anonymized medical records to study aspects like assessments, diagnoses, treatment plans etc. This could shed light on clinical practices.
• School psychology : Studies could utilize anonymized student records like test scores, grades, disciplinary issues, and counseling referrals to study child development, learning barriers, effectiveness of support programs, and more.

How do I Write a Case Study in Psychology?

Follow specified case study guidelines provided by a journal or your psychology tutor. General components of clinical case studies include: background, symptoms, assessments, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Interpreting the information means the researcher decides what to include or leave out. A good case study should always clarify which information is the factual description and which is an inference or the researcher’s opinion.

1. Introduction

• Provide background on the case context and why it is of interest, presenting background information like demographics, relevant history, and presenting problem.
• Compare briefly to similar published cases if applicable. Clearly state the focus/importance of the case.

2. Case Presentation

• Describe the presenting problem in detail, including symptoms, duration,and impact on daily life.
• Include client demographics like age and gender, information about social relationships, and mental health history.
• Describe all physical, emotional, and/or sensory symptoms reported by the client.
• Use patient quotes to describe the initial complaint verbatim. Follow with full-sentence summaries of relevant history details gathered, including key components that led to a working diagnosis.
• Summarize clinical exam results, namely orthopedic/neurological tests, imaging, lab tests, etc. Note actual results rather than subjective conclusions. Provide images if clearly reproducible/anonymized.
• Clearly state the working diagnosis or clinical impression before transitioning to management.

3. Management and Outcome

• Indicate the total duration of care and number of treatments given over what timeframe. Use specific names/descriptions for any therapies/interventions applied.
• Present the results of the intervention,including any quantitative or qualitative data collected.
• For outcomes, utilize visual analog scales for pain, medication usage logs, etc., if possible. Include patient self-reports of improvement/worsening of symptoms. Note the reason for discharge/end of care.

4. Discussion

• Analyze the case, exploring contributing factors, limitations of the study, and connections to existing research.
• Analyze the effectiveness of the intervention,considering factors like participant adherence, limitations of the study, and potential alternative explanations for the results.
• Identify any questions raised in the case analysis and relate insights to established theories and current research if applicable. Avoid definitive claims about physiological explanations.
• Offer clinical implications, and suggest future research directions.

5. Additional Items

• Thank specific assistants for writing support only. No patient acknowledgments.
• References should directly support any key claims or quotes included.
• Use tables/figures/images only if substantially informative. Include permissions and legends/explanatory notes.
• Provides detailed (rich qualitative) information.
• Provides insight for further research.
• Permitting investigation of otherwise impractical (or unethical) situations.

Case studies allow a researcher to investigate a topic in far more detail than might be possible if they were trying to deal with a large number of research participants (nomothetic approach) with the aim of ‘averaging’.

Because of their in-depth, multi-sided approach, case studies often shed light on aspects of human thinking and behavior that would be unethical or impractical to study in other ways.

Research that only looks into the measurable aspects of human behavior is not likely to give us insights into the subjective dimension of experience, which is important to psychoanalytic and humanistic psychologists.

Case studies are often used in exploratory research. They can help us generate new ideas (that might be tested by other methods). They are an important way of illustrating theories and can help show how different aspects of a person’s life are related to each other.

The method is, therefore, important for psychologists who adopt a holistic point of view (i.e., humanistic psychologists ).

Limitations

• Lacking scientific rigor and providing little basis for generalization of results to the wider population.
• Researchers’ own subjective feelings may influence the case study (researcher bias).
• Difficult to replicate.
• Time-consuming and expensive.
• The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources.

Because a case study deals with only one person/event/group, we can never be sure if the case study investigated is representative of the wider body of “similar” instances. This means the conclusions drawn from a particular case may not be transferable to other settings.

Because case studies are based on the analysis of qualitative (i.e., descriptive) data , a lot depends on the psychologist’s interpretation of the information she has acquired.

This means that there is a lot of scope for Anna O , and it could be that the subjective opinions of the psychologist intrude in the assessment of what the data means.

For example, Freud has been criticized for producing case studies in which the information was sometimes distorted to fit particular behavioral theories (e.g., Little Hans ).

This is also true of Money’s interpretation of the Bruce/Brenda case study (Diamond, 1997) when he ignored evidence that went against his theory.

Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1895).  Studies on hysteria . Standard Edition 2: London.

Curtiss, S. (1981). Genie: The case of a modern wild child .

Diamond, M., & Sigmundson, K. (1997). Sex Reassignment at Birth: Long-term Review and Clinical Implications. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine , 151(3), 298-304

Freud, S. (1909a). Analysis of a phobia of a five year old boy. In The Pelican Freud Library (1977), Vol 8, Case Histories 1, pages 169-306

Freud, S. (1909b). Bemerkungen über einen Fall von Zwangsneurose (Der “Rattenmann”). Jb. psychoanal. psychopathol. Forsch ., I, p. 357-421; GW, VII, p. 379-463; Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis, SE , 10: 151-318.

Harlow J. M. (1848). Passage of an iron rod through the head.  Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, 39 , 389–393.

Harlow, J. M. (1868).  Recovery from the Passage of an Iron Bar through the Head .  Publications of the Massachusetts Medical Society. 2  (3), 327-347.

Money, J., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (1972).  Man & Woman, Boy & Girl : The Differentiation and Dimorphism of Gender Identity from Conception to Maturity. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Money, J., & Tucker, P. (1975). Sexual signatures: On being a man or a woman.

Further Information

• Case Study Approach
• Case Study Method
• Enhancing the Quality of Case Studies in Health Services Research
• “We do things together” A case study of “couplehood” in dementia
• Using mixed methods for evaluating an integrative approach to cancer care: a case study

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Measuring and improving public space resilience to the covid-19 pandemic: chongqing-china as a case study provisionally accepted.

• 1 Chongqing University, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized the importance of public spaces. Accessing public spaces during the pandemic improves physical health, reduces feelings of loneliness, and lessens depression. However, not all public spaces can provide an effective response during the pandemic. The public spaces' ability to respond to the pandemic varies depending on their resilience level, which refers to the capability of those spaces to adapt to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and maintain functionality to meet users' needs during this crisis. By investigating the response of existing public spaces to the COVID-19 pandemic and identifying and examining the criteria of pandemic resilience, this study aims to explore and improve public spaces' capability to respond effectively during the pandemic. 169 public spaces in three regions in Chongqing City in China are studied. Four main criteria involving 9 sub-criteria of pandemic resilience that can be integrated into public spaces' planning and design are studied. Three questionnaire surveys are used in this study to examine how public spaces adapt to the pandemic and evaluate the pandemic resilience criteria. The questionnaire data is analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. The pandemic resilience criteria are assessed and analyzed using a Geographic Information System (GIS). The study utilized the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assign weights to the criteria of pandemic resilience. Weighted overlay analysis (WOA) is applied to assess the pandemic resilience level in public spaces. Results indicate various possibilities for pandemic resilience depending on the characteristics of the area. However, these resilience levels are inadequate to respond effectively to the pandemic, resulting in diminished utilization of public spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic across all studied regions compared to the periods preceding the pandemic and after the complete reopening. This study presents a remarkable source for strengthening the resilience of cities against pandemic emergencies.

Keywords: Chongqing, COVID-19 pandemic, Planning and design, preparedness, public space, resilience, response, Sustainable cities

Received: 08 Feb 2024; Accepted: 13 May 2024.

Copyright: © 2024 ALAWI, Chu and Rui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Prof. Dongzhu Chu, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400030, China

People also looked at