kraken interview case study

Top 25 Kraken Digital Asset Exchange Interview Questions & Answers

Get ready for your interview at Kraken Digital Asset Exchange with a list of common questions you may encounter and how to prepare for them effectively.

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange, a leading cryptocurrency exchange platform, has been at the forefront of the digital currency revolution since its inception in 2011. Founded by Jesse Powell, Kraken has grown to become one of the largest and most respected cryptocurrency exchanges in the world, boasting a diverse range of tradable digital assets and a strong commitment to security and regulatory compliance. As the platform continues to expand its global footprint, job seekers interested in joining the Kraken team may be curious about the interview process and the types of questions they can expect. In this article, we will explore some of the most common and intriguing interview questions asked by Kraken, providing valuable insights for those looking to embark on a career in the exciting world of digital currency.

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange Hiring Process

The Kraken Digital Asset Exchange hiring process typically consists of multiple stages, including an initial HR screening, technical interviews, and a case study or assessment. Candidates report a positive atmosphere and friendly interviewers, but some have experienced disorganization and lack of communication from the HR team. The process can be lengthy, with some candidates waiting weeks for feedback or experiencing last-minute changes to interview schedules. Overall, Kraken’s hiring process is thorough and focused on finding the right fit for both technical skills and company culture.

Common Kraken Digital Asset Exchange Interview Questions

1. can you describe your experience with digital asset exchanges, specifically relating to client engagement and customer support.

Understanding your experience with digital asset exchanges is crucial because this industry has its own set of unique challenges, including highly technical issues and complex regulatory compliance requirements. Your ability to navigate these complexities while maintaining a high level of customer satisfaction will be a key indicator of your potential success in the role. Furthermore, it’s a way to assess your knowledge of the industry and your ability to handle the pressures that come with it.

How to Answer:

In your response, highlight your familiarity with digital asset exchanges and emphasize any specific experience in client engagement or customer support. Discuss scenarios where you’ve effectively resolved issues, onboarded new clients, or enhanced user experiences within this field. If you’re less experienced, discuss how your skills transfer to this context and outline the strategies you would use to engage customers and provide high-quality support.

Example: In my experience with digital asset exchanges, I’ve found that client engagement and customer support are pivotal to the success of any platform. For instance, I was involved in a project where we had to implement a new feature on our exchange. We ensured that clients were part of the process from the onset by soliciting their feedback and incorporating it into our development roadmap. This not only improved the final product but also fostered a sense of ownership among our users.

Customer support is another area where I have extensive experience. In one particular situation, there was an issue with delayed transactions which caused significant concern among our users. My team and I worked around the clock to address each query, providing updates and reassurances. We also took this as an opportunity to improve our communication channels and implemented automated notifications for transaction statuses. This greatly reduced the volume of similar queries in the future and increased overall user satisfaction. These experiences underscored for me the importance of proactive engagement and responsive support in maintaining trust and confidence in a digital asset exchange.

2. How would you handle a high-stress situation involving a frustrated client or user of our platform?

A core part of any customer-facing role, especially in the fast-paced and often volatile field of digital asset trading, is the ability to handle stress and diffuse tense situations. This question probes your capacity to maintain composure, use problem-solving skills, and exhibit empathy when dealing with frustrated clients. The goal is to ensure that you can not only manage the immediate issue, but also nurture the client relationship in the long run, thereby bolstering the company’s reputation.

Start your response by acknowledging the importance of maintaining calm under pressure. Highlight past experiences where you’ve successfully navigated stressful situations, focusing on effective communication and problem-solving skills. Discuss your strategies for understanding the client’s frustrations and working towards a resolution. If you’re new to this, explain how you’d empathize with the user, actively listen to their concerns, propose possible solutions, and ensure follow-ups until satisfaction is achieved. Remember, the key here is showcasing your ability to turn a negative situation into a positive experience.

Example: In a high-stress situation involving a frustrated client, my first step would be to remain calm and composed. It’s crucial to not let the stress of the situation affect my ability to effectively communicate with the client. I’d actively listen to their concerns, empathize with them, and assure them that I’m there to help resolve their issue.

Once I fully understand their problem, I’ll provide clear and concise information on how we can address it. If it’s something that can’t be resolved immediately, I’d set realistic expectations about what steps need to be taken and the timeline for resolution. Throughout this process, maintaining transparency and regular updates is key to reassure the client that their issue is being handled diligently. This approach not only helps in resolving the current issue but also aids in building trust and long-term relationships with clients.

3. What programming languages are you proficient in, and how do they apply to developing software for a digital asset exchange?

This question aims to gauge both your technical skills and your understanding of the specific needs of a digital asset exchange. Coding languages might be universal, but the ways they’re applied can vary greatly depending on the industry. For a digital asset exchange, for example, security, speed, and reliability might be paramount. So, being proficient in a programming language is one thing, but knowing how to apply that knowledge to meet the unique needs of a digital asset exchange is another.

Reflect on the programming languages you excel in and describe how each one could benefit a digital asset exchange. Highlight experiences where you used these languages to solve problems or enhance functionality, preferably in FinTech-related projects. Speak about your adaptability to learn new technologies if required. Remember, they are not only interested in your technical skills but also how you apply them creatively and strategically.

Example: I am proficient in several programming languages including Python, JavaScript, and Solidity. Python is a versatile language that can be used for various aspects of software development such as back-end server scripting, data analysis, AI, and more. It’s particularly useful in the context of a digital asset exchange due to its robust libraries for handling financial data.

JavaScript, on the other hand, is essential for front-end development. With it, I can create intuitive user interfaces and ensure seamless interaction between the client-side and the server-side. Lastly, Solidity is an object-oriented language specifically designed for writing smart contracts on blockchain platforms like Ethereum. This skill comes in handy when dealing with cryptocurrencies and creating secure, decentralized exchanges. All these languages combined provide a comprehensive toolkit for developing efficient, user-friendly, and secure digital asset exchange platforms.

4. Describe a time when you had to source and recruit candidates for technical positions within the financial industry.

As a company operating at the intersection of finance and technology, hiring managers want assurance that you understand the unique skills and experiences required for roles in this niche field. Sourcing and recruiting candidates for technical positions in the financial industry requires an understanding of both sectors. This question allows them to gauge your expertise in identifying top talent and your ability to attract these individuals to the company.

Reflect on your experiences of sourcing and recruiting for similar positions. Highlight methods you’ve used, such as networking events, online platforms or referrals. Discuss specific instances where you successfully found a candidate who was an excellent fit. If you’re less experienced, discuss strategies you would use, emphasizing your understanding of the industry’s needs. Remember to showcase your determination and resourcefulness.

Example: In my previous experience, I was tasked with sourcing and recruiting candidates for a fintech company that required technical professionals skilled in blockchain technology. Given the niche nature of this field, it was crucial to have a strategic approach. I started by identifying key skills needed such as knowledge of distributed ledger technology, cryptography, and programming languages like Solidity or Go.

I leveraged various channels including LinkedIn, GitHub, and Stack Overflow to find potential candidates. Additionally, I attended relevant industry conferences and meetups to network and identify passive talent. Throughout the process, I kept communication transparent and consistent, ensuring candidates were informed about the company’s mission, culture, and the role’s expectations.

The screening involved assessing their technical proficiency through coding tests and problem-solving scenarios related to financial transactions on the blockchain. This helped evaluate not just their hard skills but also their ability to innovate and adapt, which is vital in the rapidly evolving crypto space. The result was successful placement of several qualified individuals who made significant contributions to our projects.

5. How have you ensured compliance with regulations and policies at previous companies dealing with digital assets?

When it comes to dealing with digital assets, compliance with regulations and policies is a linchpin for success. By asking this question, the hiring team wants to assess your knowledge of the regulatory landscape, your ability to implement policies effectively, and your experience in maintaining compliance within the fast-paced, ever-evolving world of digital assets. This is crucial in ensuring that the company operates within legal boundaries while also protecting its interests and those of its clients.

Begin by detailing your understanding of the importance of compliance in the digital assets industry. Refer to specific regulations you’ve dealt with, and provide examples where you proactively ensured adherence to these policies. Highlight any tools or resources used for tracking and maintaining compliance. If possible, demonstrate how your actions reduced risk or led to positive outcomes for the company. Emphasize your commitment to staying updated on regulatory changes within the industry.

Example: In my previous company, I was part of a team responsible for ensuring compliance with various regulations and policies related to digital assets. One key strategy we adopted was implementing robust internal controls designed to meet the specific requirements of each regulation or policy. For instance, in response to Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations, we established detailed customer identification procedures, ongoing transaction monitoring systems, and risk assessment mechanisms.

Furthermore, we recognized that maintaining compliance is not a one-time task but requires continuous effort. Therefore, we regularly conducted internal audits and reviews to identify any potential areas of non-compliance and rectify them promptly. We also provided regular training sessions for our staff to ensure they were up-to-date on the latest regulatory changes and understood their roles in achieving compliance. This proactive approach helped us stay ahead of regulatory changes and ensured our operations remained within the legal framework at all times.

6. Explain your approach to managing administrative tasks while supporting multiple teams within a fast-paced organization.

At the heart of this inquiry is your ability to juggle multiple responsibilities and teams in a high-octane environment. It’s all about demonstrating your organizational skills, time management abilities, and how you prioritize tasks. Your potential employer wants to see a track record of efficiency, flexibility, and the ability to stay cool under pressure. Your answer should reflect how you can contribute to the smooth running of operations, and how your approach aligns with the company’s fast-paced culture.

To respond effectively, illustrate your ability to multitask and prioritize. Discuss experiences where you handled administrative tasks across several teams successfully. Mention your use of tools or systems that helped in organization and efficiency such as project management tools. Highlight an instance when your organizational skills directly contributed to a team’s success. Remember, it’s vital to show adaptability and keenness for thriving under pressure.

Example: In managing administrative tasks within a fast-paced organization like Kraken Digital Asset Exchange, I prioritize effective organization and clear communication. I utilize digital tools such as project management software to keep track of all ongoing projects, deadlines, and responsibilities across various teams. This allows me to have an overview of the entire operation at any given time, enabling me to make informed decisions about resource allocation and task prioritization.

Moreover, I firmly believe in proactive communication. By keeping everyone updated on their responsibilities and upcoming deadlines, it ensures that each team member is aware of what’s expected from them and can plan their work accordingly. For instance, if there are changes in priorities or new tasks coming up, I ensure these are communicated immediately to avoid confusion and maintain productivity. In essence, my approach revolves around strategic planning, efficient use of technology, and transparent communication to manage administrative tasks while supporting multiple teams effectively.

7. How do you maintain excellent customer service standards even when dealing with complex issues related to cryptocurrency transactions?

Those in the hot seat for this question need to demonstrate a deep understanding of the balance between technical expertise and customer service skills. In the complex world of cryptocurrency, where transactions can be intricate and confusing for many customers, maintaining high service standards is paramount. Interviewers want to ensure you can handle intricate problems, explain them in a user-friendly way, and still provide a positive customer experience, all at the same time.

Kickstart your response by sharing real-life instances where you’ve dealt with complex issues while maintaining high customer service standards. Highlight your problem-solving skills, patience and ability to explain complex information in simple terms. Mention if you have experience in the cryptocurrency sector. If not, emphasize your eagerness to learn and adapt to new industries and technologies, as well as your commitment to delivering exceptional customer service no matter what.

Example: Maintaining excellent customer service standards in the face of complex cryptocurrency issues requires a combination of technical expertise, clear communication, and empathy. For instance, if a client is having trouble understanding why their transaction hasn’t been confirmed on the blockchain yet, I would first ensure that I fully understand the issue myself by looking into the specifics of the transaction, including factors like network congestion or low transaction fees which could be causing the delay.

Once I have a grasp of the situation, I would then communicate this to the customer in a simple and understandable manner, avoiding jargon as much as possible. It’s important to acknowledge their frustration and reassure them that their concern is valid and being addressed. This approach not only resolves the immediate problem but also builds trust and fosters a positive relationship with the customer, ensuring they feel valued and understood. Ultimately, maintaining high customer service standards means combining deep knowledge of cryptocurrency transactions with an ability to make customers feel heard and supported.

8. Share an example of a recruiting strategy that helped you attract top talent for senior-level roles.

At the heart of every successful organization is a team of talented individuals. Therefore, a company’s ability to attract, hire, and retain top talent, particularly for senior-level roles, is critical. This question seeks to understand your strategic thinking, creativity, and effectiveness in attracting high calibre candidates. Your ability to devise and implement successful recruiting strategies directly impacts an organization’s performance and growth, hence the importance of this question.

Reflect on a time when your strategic approach made a significant difference in attracting senior-level talent. You might discuss proactive sourcing methods, targeted job descriptions or leveraging industry networks. Mention how you utilized data and analytics to refine the recruitment process. Highlighting a specific instance where your strategy resulted in hiring an impactful leader will showcase your capability and understanding of high-level recruitment. Remember, it’s not just about filling a role, but finding the right fit for both the company and candidate.

Example: In a previous position, I implemented a strategy that focused on building relationships with potential candidates long before a relevant role became available. This proactive approach involved identifying key industry professionals and engaging them through networking events, social media interactions, and personal introductions. By establishing these connections early on, we were able to create a pool of high-quality candidates who already had some familiarity with our company and culture.

When it came time to fill senior-level roles, we could then reach out to this network directly. Not only did this save significant time in the recruitment process, but it also increased the likelihood of finding a candidate who was both highly skilled and a good cultural fit for our team. The result was an improvement in both the speed of hiring and the quality of hires for senior positions.

9. Describe your experience managing product development from ideation to launch, particularly for trading platforms or fintech products.

The essence of this question lies in the interviewer’s desire to gauge your familiarity with the full product development cycle, especially in the fintech or trading platform sector. They want to understand your ability to conceptualize, manage, and execute the launch of a product, ensuring its alignment with industry standards and customer expectations. Your answer will reveal your strategic thinking, project management skills, and understanding of the fintech market.

Begin by detailing your experiences with specific projects you’ve worked on. Describe the stages from ideation, planning, execution to launch and how you managed each phase. Highlight any unique challenges faced in fintech or trading platforms and how you overcame them. Also emphasize your ability to collaborate with cross-functional teams and your role in making critical decisions. If you’re new to this, discuss theoretical knowledge and steps you’d take based on that understanding.

Example: In my previous experience managing product development for a fintech firm, I was responsible for the entire lifecycle of our new trading platform. Starting with ideation, I led brainstorming sessions and conducted market research to understand user needs and industry trends. This informed our vision and objectives for the product.

During the design phase, I worked closely with UX/UI designers and developers to ensure that our platform was intuitive, secure, and efficient. We iteratively tested prototypes with users, incorporating their feedback into subsequent designs. Throughout this process, I maintained open lines of communication between all stakeholders, ensuring everyone was aligned on our goals and progress.

As we moved towards launch, I coordinated marketing efforts to generate buzz and managed the beta testing process to identify any last-minute issues. Post-launch, I oversaw the collection and analysis of user data to assess the success of the platform and identify areas for improvement. The end result was a robust trading platform that saw significant adoption among our target audience, demonstrating the effectiveness of our thorough, user-centered approach to product development.

10. How do you manage project timelines, resources, and stakeholders during the implementation of new technology solutions?

When you’re spearheading the implementation of new tech solutions, you’re essentially at the helm of a ship. This question helps hiring managers understand your navigation skills—how you strategically allocate resources, ensure all stakeholders are in the know, and keep the project running like a well-oiled machine despite potential bumps along the way. It’s about demonstrating your ability to lead a complex project from inception to completion, all while maintaining the highest standards of efficiency and communication.

To answer this question, focus on your experience in project management within the context of implementing new technology. Highlight situations where you’ve had to manage timelines effectively and allocate resources wisely. Discuss how you’ve communicated with stakeholders throughout the process, ensuring their expectations were met. If you’re less experienced, explain your understanding of the importance of these tasks and how you would approach them. Show that you understand the balance between speed, efficiency, and stakeholder satisfaction.

Example: Managing project timelines, resources, and stakeholders during the implementation of new technology solutions requires a well-structured approach. I usually start by setting clear goals and expectations for all involved parties. This includes defining what success looks like, establishing milestones, and creating a detailed timeline with specific tasks and deadlines.

To manage resources effectively, I use project management tools to track progress and ensure that we’re staying on budget. Additionally, I regularly communicate with team members to understand any potential roadblocks they may be facing and work together to find solutions. For stakeholder management, I believe in maintaining transparency throughout the process. Regular updates are provided to keep them informed about the project’s status, potential risks, and mitigation strategies. In my experience, this proactive communication helps build trust, ensures alignment, and ultimately leads to successful project delivery.

11. In what ways have you stayed informed about changes and trends within the cryptocurrency market, and how does this knowledge benefit your work?

To navigate the rapidly evolving landscape of cryptocurrency, it’s essential to stay updated with the latest trends and developments. By asking this question, the interviewer wants to assess your commitment to continuous learning and your ability to use that knowledge to make informed decisions. Your ability to stay abreast of market changes can directly influence your effectiveness in roles involving strategy, trading, customer service, and more.

When answering this question, discuss the various sources you use to stay updated on cryptocurrency trends such as financial news outlets, blogs, forums or social media. Highlight how you analyze and apply this information in your work; perhaps by making informed decisions, forecasting market trends, managing risks or advising clients. If possible, provide specific examples where your knowledge of the cryptocurrency market positively impacted your job performance.

Example: I have made it a habit to stay informed about the cryptocurrency market through various channels. I regularly follow reputable crypto news outlets, blogs, and forums like CoinDesk, Cointelegraph, and Reddit’s r/cryptocurrency for up-to-date information on market trends, regulatory changes, and technological advancements. Additionally, I use tools like CoinMarketCap and CryptoCompare to monitor price movements and trading volumes of different cryptocurrencies.

This knowledge greatly benefits my work as it allows me to make data-driven decisions and provide strategic advice based on current market conditions. Understanding the volatility of the market, its cyclical nature, and being aware of factors that influence price movements are crucial in managing risks and capitalizing on opportunities. Also, staying updated with regulatory changes helps in ensuring compliance and navigating potential challenges. Ultimately, this continuous learning process enhances my ability to contribute effectively to Kraken’s mission of promoting the adoption of cryptocurrency.

12. How do you balance prioritizing requests and concerns across various departments, including engineering, customer support, and compliance?

When you’re in a role that requires managing and balancing priorities across various departments, it’s essential that you can demonstrate your ability to efficiently prioritize tasks and manage time effectively. This is particularly important in a dynamic environment like digital asset exchange, where changes happen quickly and decisions often have a direct impact on the company’s bottom line. Your potential employer wants to be sure you can handle these demands while keeping all departments aligned and moving towards the company’s overall goals.

Start by discussing your experience in managing different departments’ requests and concerns. Highlight how you effectively use prioritization tools or techniques such as the Eisenhower Matrix or ABC Analysis. Speak about your ability to understand each department’s urgency, deadlines, and importance. Also, mention your strong communication skills that enable you to keep all stakeholders informed of progress, mitigating any potential conflicts. Lastly, demonstrate your flexibility and adaptability to changing priorities.

Example: Balancing priorities across various departments requires a clear understanding of the company’s strategic goals, effective communication skills, and an ability to make data-driven decisions. For instance, if we have a major product release coming up, the engineering department might need more attention to ensure that they’re on track for the launch. However, this doesn’t mean ignoring other departments like customer support or compliance. It’s crucial to maintain regular check-ins with all teams to understand their needs and concerns.

In terms of prioritization, I believe in using a mix of quantitative and qualitative metrics. This could involve looking at key performance indicators such as the number of open tickets in customer support or potential risk factors identified by the compliance team. At the same time, it’s important to consider the impact on overall business objectives and stakeholder expectations. Regularly reassessing these priorities is also essential as business needs change over time. Ultimately, balancing requests and concerns across departments involves constant communication, careful analysis, and thoughtful decision-making.

13. What methods have you used to effectively onboard new team members remotely?

Given that many businesses are increasingly shifting towards a more remote or hybrid work model, having a robust remote onboarding process is key. This question is designed to assess your ability to integrate new hires into the team, even when you can’t do so face-to-face. It’s about understanding how you streamline communication, foster relationships, and ensure that new team members have all the resources they need to hit the ground running, all from a distance.

To answer this question, highlight your experience in remote team integration. Discuss strategies like setting clear expectations, providing comprehensive virtual training, and developing open lines of communication for queries and feedback. If you have initiated regular check-ins or established a buddy system to make new members feel welcome, don’t forget to mention that. Also, talk about any tools or technologies you leveraged to enhance the onboarding process.

Example: In my experience, effectively onboarding new team members remotely requires a combination of structured training and personal engagement. I have utilized digital tools like Asana for task management, where we can set up an onboarding project with all the necessary tasks and resources that a new employee needs to get started. This provides a clear roadmap for their first few weeks.

However, it’s also crucial to build connections between the new hire and the rest of the team. To facilitate this, I’ve organized virtual meet-and-greets or one-on-one meetings with key team members. These sessions are not only about discussing work but also getting to know each other on a personal level. Additionally, regular check-ins during the initial period help ensure any questions or concerns are addressed promptly and the new member feels supported in their transition.

14. Describe how you have successfully resolved conflicts between team members to ensure a productive working environment.

Resolving conflicts among team members is pivotal in any organization. In the fast-paced, dynamic world of digital asset exchange, it’s especially critical. Disputes can slow down productivity, create a toxic environment, and ultimately impact the company’s performance and bottom line. As such, hiring managers are keen to understand your conflict resolution skills, how you maintain team harmony, and ensure collaboration towards common goals.

Begin your response by illustrating a specific situation where you faced conflict among team members. Discuss the measures you took to understand different perspectives, mediate the disagreement and encourage open communication. Highlight any techniques or strategies used for conflict resolution such as active listening, empathy, problem-solving skills or negotiation. Don’t forget to mention the successful outcome that resulted from your intervention, showing how it led to a more harmonious and productive working environment.

Example: In one of my previous projects, I noticed a conflict arising between two team members due to differing opinions on the direction of the project. The disagreement was causing tension and affecting the overall productivity of the team.

To address this issue, I first arranged individual meetings with each party involved in the dispute to understand their perspectives. By doing so, I aimed to create an environment where they could express their concerns freely without feeling defensive. After gaining insights into both sides, I facilitated a joint meeting where everyone had the chance to present their viewpoint. This approach allowed them to better understand each other’s perspective and find common ground.

The key here was promoting open communication and ensuring that every voice was heard. We eventually reached a compromise that satisfied all parties and moved forward as a more cohesive unit. This experience taught me the importance of proactive conflict resolution in maintaining a productive working environment.

15. How do you monitor and measure the performance of different teams within the company and facilitate their improvement?

Understanding how to monitor and measure team performance is crucial in any organization. It speaks to your ability to identify key performance indicators, implement systems for tracking those metrics, and develop strategies for improvement. Furthermore, it shows your potential as a leader who can foster a culture of continuous improvement and high performance. This is especially important in a fast-paced, dynamic industry where teams must adapt quickly to changes and consistently deliver high-quality results.

Start by discussing your experience with various performance metrics used in past roles. Highlight how you’ve leveraged these to track team progress, identify areas of improvement, and implement strategies for enhancement. Mention if you have facilitated workshops or training sessions to upskill teams. Provide an example where your monitoring and facilitation led to significant improvements. Remember, the goal is to show your analytical skills and proactive approach towards improving team efficiency.

Example: Monitoring and measuring the performance of different teams within a company involves a combination of quantitative and qualitative assessments. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are crucial in this process, as they provide measurable and objective data on various aspects such as productivity, efficiency, and quality of work. For instance, for a team handling customer service at Kraken Digital Asset Exchange, KPIs could include average response time, resolution rate, or customer satisfaction scores.

However, it’s also important to consider qualitative factors like teamwork, communication, and problem-solving skills. Regular meetings, feedback sessions, and one-on-one discussions can help gauge these aspects. To facilitate improvement, I believe in creating an open environment where teams feel comfortable sharing their challenges and ideas. Providing ongoing training and development opportunities is also key. Additionally, using tools that provide real-time analytics can help identify trends and areas needing attention promptly. This balanced approach ensures not only high-performance levels but also continuous learning and growth within the team.

16. Can you provide an example of a process improvement you implemented that increased efficiency or reduced costs at your previous organization?

Hiring teams want to see that you’re not just capable of doing a task, but that you’re also capable of improving the way it’s done. By asking this question, they’re looking for evidence of your problem-solving skills, your ability to take initiative, and your capacity to bring about positive change in an organization. It’s also a way to gauge your understanding of efficiency and cost-effectiveness, two concepts that are critical in any business environment, including digital asset exchange.

Reflect on your past experiences where you’ve made a significant difference in process enhancement. Discuss the scenario, what actions you took, and the results of those actions. Be specific about any metrics or data that prove success, such as reduced time spent on tasks, decreased costs, or increased productivity. If you’re new to the field, discuss theoretical strategies you would use based on your knowledge and studies. Remember, this is a chance to showcase your problem-solving skills and impact on an organization’s bottom line.

Example: In my previous organization, we were facing challenges with the time taken to resolve customer support tickets. The process was inefficient and led to a backlog of unresolved issues which negatively impacted customer satisfaction. I initiated an analysis of the existing process and identified key areas that were causing delays. One of the primary bottlenecks was the lack of categorization of issues, leading to misallocation of resources.

To address this, I proposed implementing a ticket triage system where incoming issues would be categorized based on their complexity. Simple issues could be resolved by junior team members, while complex ones would be escalated to senior staff. This allowed us to utilize our resources more effectively and reduce the resolution time significantly. Additionally, I suggested automating certain repetitive tasks using AI-based tools which further increased efficiency. As a result, we managed to decrease the average resolution time by 30% and cut costs associated with overtime and overstaffing. Moreover, it improved our customer satisfaction rate considerably.

17. Explain how you’ve handled situations where you needed to deliver difficult feedback to an underperforming team member.

Giving feedback, especially when it’s not all positive, is a fundamental aspect of leadership. It is a test of your ability to balance honesty with empathy, and it’s a key driver of team performance. Therefore, a question about providing difficult feedback helps interviewers gauge your communication skills, your judgment, and your ability to manage and develop others, all of which are critical for leadership roles.

Start by explaining the importance of open communication and honesty in a team. Then, share an example where you provided constructive criticism to a colleague who was underperforming. Make sure to highlight your approach to keeping the feedback focused on their work performance, not personal attributes. Discuss how you proposed actionable solutions to improve and monitored their progress afterwards. Finally, express that difficult conversations are essential for growth and improvement, despite being uncomfortable at times.

Example: In a previous situation, I had to provide feedback to a team member who was consistently missing deadlines. Instead of directly pointing out the issue, I initiated a conversation about how they were managing their workload and if there were any challenges they were facing. This approach allowed them to reflect on their performance without feeling attacked.

After understanding their perspective, I shared my observations with concrete examples and data. I made sure to emphasize that the goal was not to criticize but to help them improve. We then collaboratively developed an action plan which included regular check-ins for progress updates. By handling the situation in this manner, it not only helped the individual improve their performance but also strengthened our professional relationship.

18. Discuss a challenging problem you encountered while working on a software engineering project, and outline the steps you took to address it.

A software engineering role often involves tackling complex problems and finding innovative solutions. Therefore, this question is designed to assess your problem-solving skills and your ability to navigate challenges. Additionally, it gives insight into your thought process, illustrating how you approach difficult situations, your resilience, and your ability to think critically and logically to deliver effective outcomes in your projects.

You should be ready to share a real-life story where you faced a significant challenge in your software engineering project. Start by explaining the project’s context, then describe the problem in detail and why it was challenging. Highlight the strategy or steps you took to solve the issue, demonstrating your creativity, analytical skills, and resilience. Don’t forget to mention what you learned from this experience and how it has helped you become a better engineer.

Example: One of the most challenging problems I encountered was during a project where we were migrating our microservices architecture from a monolithic system. The issue arose when we realized that some services, which were heavily dependent on each other, were not communicating efficiently after the migration and this was causing significant performance issues.

To address this problem, I first conducted a thorough analysis to identify the root cause. It turned out that the inter-service communication was suffering due to network latency and inefficient data serialization formats. To resolve these issues, I proposed using gRPC protocol instead of HTTP/REST for service-to-service communication because of its lower latency and built-in protobuf serialization. Additionally, I also suggested implementing circuit breaker patterns to prevent failure cascading between services. After conducting a successful proof-of-concept demonstrating the benefits of these changes, I led the team in implementing them across our microservices ecosystem. This significantly improved the system’s performance and resilience.

19. How do you stay current with the latest industry regulations and ensure that your team is compliant?

Navigating the fast-paced and ever-evolving world of digital assets requires a constant commitment to learning and adaptability. This question is designed to assess your ability to keep up with the dynamic regulatory environment. It also tests your leadership and management skills, as it’s not just about your individual compliance, but also ensuring your team’s adherence to the latest rules and standards.

Highlight your discipline in keeping up-to-date with regulatory changes through reading industry news, attending webinars or conferences. Discuss how you disseminate this information to your team – perhaps via meetings or training sessions. Mention any systems you have in place to ensure compliance is monitored and maintained. If possible, provide examples of when your proactive approach to staying current has benefited a past employer or project.

Example: Staying current with the latest industry regulations is a crucial part of my work. I do this by subscribing to relevant newsletters, attending webinars and conferences, and being an active member in professional groups that discuss these topics. For instance, within the cryptocurrency space, regulatory changes are common and can significantly impact operations. Therefore, it’s essential to keep abreast of updates from organizations such as the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

To ensure compliance within my team, I believe in proactive communication and training. Whenever there’s a significant update, I organize briefings or workshops to explain the implications and necessary adjustments to our procedures. Additionally, we use compliance software tools that alert us to any non-compliant activities. This combination of continuous learning and leveraging technology helps us stay compliant amidst the rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.

20. What strategies have you used to maintain a strong company culture while managing remote teams?

In an age where remote work is becoming increasingly common, a company’s culture can often be its backbone. It’s what keeps employees engaged, motivated, and loyal. Interviewers want to know if you have the experience and skills to foster a positive, inclusive, and productive company culture, even when team members are scattered across different locations. Your ability to maintain a strong company culture in a remote setting speaks volumes about your leadership, communication skills, and understanding of what drives employee satisfaction and performance.

Reflect on your experience in managing remote teams and the tactics you used to foster a strong culture. Discuss strategies like regular virtual team meetings, one-on-one check-ins for personalized attention, online team-building activities or creating open channels of communication. Share any successful outcomes, such as improved collaboration or employee satisfaction rates. If you haven’t managed remote teams before, suggest measures you’d implement based on your understanding of effective remote work dynamics.

Example: In managing remote teams, I’ve found that communication is key to maintaining a strong company culture. Regular check-ins and meetings via video conferencing platforms have been instrumental in ensuring everyone feels connected and part of the team. These meetings aren’t just for work updates; they also serve as an avenue for casual conversations and bonding activities, which are crucial in fostering a sense of community.

Additionally, I’ve implemented virtual team-building activities such as online games or shared movie nights to promote camaraderie among team members. It’s important to create opportunities for social interaction beyond work-related matters to replicate the office environment as much as possible. Furthermore, recognizing and celebrating individual and team achievements publicly has helped maintain motivation and engagement levels high. This not only reinforces the company’s values but also shows appreciation for employees’ hard work, contributing to a positive company culture.

21. Describe how you’ve worked with cross-functional teams to achieve a shared objective, particularly within a digital asset exchange context.

This question is about assessing your teamwork and collaborative skills. In a digital asset exchange company, it’s critical to work effectively within cross-functional teams, as such teams often include members from different departments like technology, marketing, finance, and legal. These diverse perspectives are central to creating and managing complex digital exchange platforms. Your ability to navigate these varied perspectives and foster a cooperative environment is key to achieving shared objectives.

Prepare for this question by reflecting on your past experiences where you had to collaborate with various departments to reach a common goal. Discuss how you communicated effectively, resolved conflicts, and managed tasks within the team. If not directly in a digital asset exchange context, highlight instances where you’ve dealt with complex projects or situations which demanded similar skills. Stress on your adaptability and eagerness to work in diverse teams towards shared objectives.

Example: In my experience, working with cross-functional teams within a digital asset exchange context requires clear communication and alignment of objectives. For instance, I was part of a project where we aimed to enhance the security features of our platform. This involved collaboration between the engineering team, cybersecurity experts, user experience designers, and business strategists.

The first step was to ensure everyone understood the shared objective: improving security without compromising user-friendliness. We held regular meetings for updates on each team’s progress and challenges. The UX designers needed to understand the technical constraints from the engineers, who in turn had to comprehend the importance of intuitive design. Meanwhile, the business strategists were responsible for aligning these efforts with market demands and regulatory requirements.

Through open dialogue and mutual respect for each other’s expertise, we successfully rolled out enhanced security measures that maintained ease-of-use. It significantly reduced security-related incidents while maintaining high customer satisfaction levels. This experience taught me the value of effective cross-functional collaboration in achieving complex goals within the fast-paced environment of digital asset exchanges.

22. Can you provide an example of when you had to adapt quickly to a change in project requirements or priorities?

In the fast-paced, ever-changing landscape of digital asset exchange, agility is key. Projects can shift gears overnight, and priorities can change as quickly as the market does. Therefore, hiring managers want to ensure that you can handle sudden changes in stride, adapt quickly, and still deliver high-quality work. Your ability to demonstrate flexibility and resilience in the face of changing demands is a strong indicator of your potential success in this field.

When answering this question, share a specific instance from your past experience where project requirements or priorities changed suddenly. Detail the steps you took to adapt and how you maintained productivity during this shift. Highlight your skills in flexibility, problem-solving, and communication. If possible, mention any positive outcomes that resulted from your quick adaptation like meeting deadlines, client satisfaction, or team efficiency.

Example: In one of my previous projects, we were developing a blockchain solution for a client. Midway through the project, the client decided to pivot from Ethereum to Cardano due to its scalability and cost-effectiveness. This was a significant change as our team had primarily been working with Ethereum-based solutions.

However, I quickly adapted to this change by diving deep into understanding the technicalities of Cardano’s architecture, smart contract functionality, and consensus algorithm. I also coordinated several training sessions for my team to ensure everyone was on the same page. We managed to transition smoothly without extending the project timeline significantly. In the end, not only did we successfully deliver the project but also expanded our expertise in another major blockchain platform.

23. How have you managed stakeholder expectations during projects involving significant risk or uncertainty?

Navigating the unpredictable terrain of digital asset exchange often requires taking on projects that come with a substantial amount of risk or uncertainty. The question is designed to assess your ability to manage expectations, communicate effectively, and deliver results even in challenging circumstances. It’s all about showcasing your ability to keep stakeholders informed and reassured, even when the path forward isn’t entirely clear.

Start by outlining your process for managing expectations, such as clear communication and transparency from the beginning. Then discuss a past project where you successfully managed stakeholder expectations during a period of risk or uncertainty. Highlight how your strategies reduced tension and led to a positive outcome. If you haven’t directly handled this situation before, share steps you would take to ensure all stakeholders are kept informed about progress and changes.

Example: In one of my previous projects, we were implementing a new blockchain technology that was still in its early stages. This inherently involved significant risk and uncertainty due to the novelty of the technology and unforeseen technical challenges that could arise during implementation. To manage stakeholder expectations, I ensured open communication from the very beginning. I explained the potential risks and uncertainties involved with the project, but also highlighted the potential benefits if successful.

I also established clear milestones for the project, each with specific deliverables, so stakeholders could see progress being made even amidst the uncertainty. Regular updates were provided on our progress towards these milestones, including any roadblocks or delays encountered and how they were being addressed. By maintaining transparency about both the risks and our strategies for mitigating them, I was able to keep stakeholder expectations realistic while still fostering enthusiasm for the project’s potential.

24. What steps do you take to foster collaboration and effective communication among distributed team members?

As a global company, it’s critical to have team members who can work effectively in a distributed environment. This question is designed to assess your ability to communicate and collaborate with colleagues across different time zones and cultures. It also reflects the company’s commitment to maintaining a cohesive and productive work environment, despite the geographical distances between team members.

When answering this question, highlight your experience with virtual communication tools and methodologies. Discuss practices like regular check-ins, transparent sharing of information, and use of collaborative platforms. Mention how you create an inclusive environment for all team members, regardless of location, by encouraging participation and providing space for everyone’s voices to be heard. If applicable, share specific instances where your efforts led to a successful collaboration within a distributed team.

Example: Fostering collaboration and effective communication among distributed team members is critical, especially in a digital asset exchange environment like Kraken. One of the first steps I take is to establish clear lines of communication using appropriate tools such as Slack or Microsoft Teams for instant messaging and Zoom or Google Meet for video conferencing. Regularly scheduled meetings are essential for keeping everyone on track and informed about ongoing projects and tasks.

In addition to these, it’s important to create an inclusive virtual culture where every member feels valued and heard. This can be achieved by encouraging open dialogue, promoting active participation during meetings, and recognizing individual contributions. For complex projects, I find that using project management software like Jira or Asana helps keep everyone aligned with their responsibilities and deadlines. Lastly, fostering a sense of camaraderie through virtual team-building activities can also help improve collaboration and communication.

25. Explain your approach to identifying potential risks and developing contingency plans for various business scenarios within the digital asset industry.

When you’re working in a rapidly evolving industry like digital assets, it’s critical to be proactive in risk management. Hiring managers ask this question to gauge your strategic thinking skills and ability to anticipate potential challenges. They want to see if you can identify risks and plan accordingly to ensure business continuity and resilience. Whether it’s market volatility, cybersecurity threats, or regulatory changes, your role involves minimizing exposure to these risks and preserving the integrity of the company’s operations.

To answer this question effectively, reflect on your previous experience identifying risks and developing contingency plans. Discuss how you stay updated with industry trends and use that knowledge to anticipate potential challenges. Highlight your analytical skills and strategic thinking in managing these situations. If applicable, mention instances where your foresight helped mitigate a risk. For those new to the field, outline your approach to learning about the digital asset industry, understanding its unique risks, and how you would develop contingency plans accordingly.

Example: In identifying potential risks within the digital asset industry, my approach is to first conduct a comprehensive analysis of both internal and external factors. This includes understanding the market trends, regulatory changes, technological advancements, and competitive landscape in the crypto industry. For instance, I would closely monitor developments in blockchain technology for any new vulnerabilities that could potentially be exploited by hackers.

Once potential risks are identified, developing contingency plans involves creating strategies that can help mitigate these risks or lessen their impact should they materialize. These plans need to be flexible enough to adapt to rapidly changing circumstances, yet robust enough to provide clear direction during times of crisis. For example, if there’s a risk of a major security breach due to an emerging hacking technique, the contingency plan might involve ramping up our cybersecurity measures, conducting regular audits, and having a dedicated response team ready to address any issues promptly. The key here is not just planning but also testing these plans regularly to ensure their effectiveness.

Top 25 Conga Interview Questions & Answers

Top 25 zapier interview questions & answers, you may also be interested in..., top 25 pizza hut delivery driver interview questions & answers, top 25 university of florida graduate research assistant interview questions & answers, top 25 twitter software engineer interview questions & answers, top 25 northrop grumman interview questions & answers.

30 Common Kraken Digital Asset Exchange Interview Questions & Answers

Prepare for your interview at Kraken Digital Asset Exchange with commonly asked interview questions and example answers and advice from experts in the field.

Preparing for an interview at Kraken Digital Asset Exchange is crucial for showcasing your knowledge and passion for the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrency. As a leading global platform for digital asset trading, Kraken values candidates who demonstrate not only technical expertise but also a deep understanding of the industry.

In this article, we will explore common interview questions and provide insightful answers to help you stand out. By familiarizing yourself with these questions and responses, you can confidently navigate your interview and increase your chances of securing a position at one of the most innovative companies in the crypto space.

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange Overview

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange is a prominent cryptocurrency exchange platform that facilitates the buying, selling, and trading of various digital assets. It offers a wide range of cryptocurrencies and provides advanced trading tools, including margin trading and futures. Known for its robust security measures and comprehensive customer support, Kraken serves both individual and institutional investors. The platform emphasizes regulatory compliance and transparency, aiming to provide a reliable and user-friendly experience for its global clientele.

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange Hiring Process

The hiring process at Kraken Digital Asset Exchange typically involves multiple stages and can span several weeks. It generally starts with an initial phone screen or video call with an HR recruiter, followed by one or more interviews with team managers or technical leads. Candidates may also be required to complete technical assessments or case studies, which can be time-consuming.

The interviews often focus on both technical skills and cultural fit, emphasizing the company’s values and work environment. Communication throughout the process can vary, with some candidates experiencing delays or lack of follow-up.

Overall, candidates should be prepared for a rigorous and thorough process, ensuring they are well-versed in their technical expertise and familiar with the company’s culture and values. While experiences may differ, it’s advisable to stay patient and maintain open communication with the recruiters.

Common Kraken Digital Asset Exchange Interview Questions

1. how would you ensure timely and effective communication with clients in a rapidly evolving digital asset environment.

Success in a rapidly evolving digital asset environment hinges on maintaining timely and effective communication with clients. This question delves into your ability to navigate the complexities of a dynamic industry where information is constantly changing and clients’ needs can shift quickly. At Kraken Digital Asset Exchange, where the landscape can change in the blink of an eye due to market fluctuations, regulatory updates, and technological advancements, the ability to convey accurate, relevant information swiftly is paramount. It reflects your capacity to build trust, manage expectations, and foster long-term relationships that withstand the volatility of the digital asset market.

How to Answer: Highlight your strategies for staying current with industry trends and regulatory changes, such as subscribing to industry newsletters, participating in professional forums, or using real-time monitoring tools. Discuss examples of how you have successfully managed client communications in previous roles, emphasizing your proactive approach to anticipating client needs and addressing concerns before they escalate. Illustrate your use of various communication channels—emails, calls, newsletters, or social media updates—to ensure your clients are always informed and confident in their decisions, thus demonstrating your readiness to thrive in Kraken’s fast-paced environment.

Example: “I’d prioritize establishing multiple channels for communication to ensure clients can reach us in the way that suits them best, whether that’s through email, a dedicated support portal, or social media. Automation can play a big role here—I’d implement chatbots for initial queries to provide quick responses, freeing up human agents for more complex issues.

Having a regular update schedule is also key. I’d set up weekly newsletters and alerts for major changes or new developments in the digital asset space to keep clients informed. Drawing from my previous experience, I’d also maintain a robust FAQ and resource center that’s constantly updated with the latest information. This way, clients have access to accurate information whenever they need it, and it can help reduce the volume of repetitive queries coming into the support team.”

2. Describe your approach to debugging and troubleshooting complex software issues.

Handling complex software issues requires a methodical and analytical approach, especially in a high-stakes environment where reliability and security are paramount. This question seeks to understand your problem-solving framework, your ability to remain calm under pressure, and your technical acumen. For an organization like Kraken, where the integrity of digital transactions is essential, demonstrating a structured approach to debugging shows that you can ensure the smooth operation of critical systems. Your ability to diagnose and resolve issues efficiently can significantly impact the company’s reputation and user trust.

How to Answer: Outline a systematic approach that includes identifying the problem, isolating variables, and using appropriate tools to trace the issue. Mention relevant experiences where you effectively debugged similar issues, highlighting your attention to detail and persistence. Illustrate your ability to collaborate with team members, as complex problems often require collective expertise. Emphasize any unique strategies or tools you employ that are particularly relevant to the sophisticated and fast-evolving nature of a digital asset exchange platform.

Example: “I like to start by breaking down the problem into smaller, more manageable parts. First, I try to replicate the issue consistently, which helps me understand the specific conditions causing it. Once I’ve reproduced the problem, I use logging and monitoring tools to gather more data, pinpointing where things might be going wrong in the code.

One time, while working on a blockchain app, we encountered an intermittent issue with transaction validation. I collaborated with the team to isolate each component—database, middleware, and front end. By setting up extensive logging, we found that a rare race condition was causing the problem. We then adjusted the transaction handling logic to ensure atomic operations, and the issue was resolved. This methodical, step-by-step approach is how I tackle complex software issues efficiently.”

3. What strategies do you use to identify and attract top talent in the tech industry?

Identifying and attracting top talent in the tech industry requires a nuanced understanding of both the technical skills needed and the cultural fit within a highly dynamic environment. Companies like Kraken face unique challenges due to rapid technological advancements and the competitive nature of the crypto and fintech sectors. Therefore, strategies must go beyond traditional recruitment methods. Leveraging data analytics to identify skill gaps, utilizing niche job boards, and engaging in community events or hackathons can help pinpoint candidates who not only possess the technical prowess but also align with the company’s innovative and forward-thinking culture. Building relationships with universities or tech bootcamps can also create a pipeline of fresh talent who are already immersed in the latest technological trends.

How to Answer: Emphasize a multi-faceted approach. Highlight any experience you have with modern recruitment tools like AI-driven talent search platforms or your involvement in tech communities. Discuss how you assess both hard and soft skills to ensure a holistic fit and mention any success stories where your strategies led to hiring top-notch talent. Showing that you understand the specific needs of a tech company in a fast-evolving industry will demonstrate your ability to adapt and innovate in your recruitment efforts.

Example: “I prioritize networking and relationship-building within the tech community. This includes attending industry conferences, participating in hackathons, and engaging in online forums like GitHub and Stack Overflow. By being active in these spaces, I can both stay current with industry trends and connect with potential candidates who are passionate and highly skilled.

Additionally, I leverage employee referrals and create an appealing employer brand by showcasing the company’s cutting-edge projects and inclusive culture through social media and blog posts. Highlighting our commitment to innovation and professional growth helps attract top talent who are looking for more than just a job—they want to be part of something transformative. For example, in my previous role, I implemented an internal referral program that resulted in a 30% increase in high-quality applicants, many of whom became key contributors to the team.”

4. Explain how you would design a scalable microservices architecture for a high-traffic financial platform.

Designing a scalable microservices architecture for a high-traffic financial platform requires a deep understanding of both technology and the specific demands of financial services, including security, reliability, and performance. Financial platforms must handle large volumes of transactions with minimal latency and ensure data integrity and security at all times. This question tests your ability to balance these requirements while designing a system that can scale efficiently as user demand grows. It also gauges your familiarity with microservices principles, such as loose coupling, high cohesion, and the ability to independently deploy and scale components of the system.

How to Answer: Detail your approach to breaking down the system into discrete services, ensuring each service is responsible for a specific piece of functionality. Discuss how you would implement service discovery, API gateways, and load balancing to manage traffic efficiently. Highlight your strategies for maintaining data consistency across services, such as using distributed transactions or eventual consistency patterns. Address security concerns by explaining how you would secure inter-service communication and protect sensitive data. Mention any relevant experience with technologies and tools commonly used in the industry, such as Kubernetes for orchestration or Kafka for message brokering, to demonstrate your practical expertise in building robust and scalable systems.

Example: “First, I’d focus on defining clear boundaries for each microservice to ensure they’re independent and can scale horizontally. For a high-traffic financial platform, this typically means separating services based on functionalities like transaction processing, user authentication, risk assessment, and data analytics.

I’d choose a container orchestration system like Kubernetes to manage and scale these microservices dynamically based on load. Each service would communicate via lightweight APIs, preferably using gRPC for efficiency. Ensuring data consistency and integrity is crucial, so I’d implement an event-driven architecture with a message broker like Kafka to handle asynchronous communication and maintain an audit trail. For data storage, I’d use a combination of SQL and NoSQL databases, selecting the best fit for each service’s specific needs. Finally, I’d implement robust monitoring and logging, leveraging tools like Prometheus and Grafana, to keep an eye on performance and quickly address any issues. This ensures the system remains resilient and can handle the high transaction volumes typical in financial platforms.”

5. How do you stay current with regulatory changes affecting the cryptocurrency market, and how would you apply this knowledge to your work?

Regulatory landscapes in the cryptocurrency market are in constant flux, with new laws and guidelines emerging frequently. This dynamic environment necessitates a proactive approach to staying informed about changes that could significantly impact operations, compliance, and strategic planning. For a company like Kraken, which operates at the intersection of finance and technology, understanding these shifts is crucial to maintaining trust, ensuring legal compliance, and driving innovation. The ability to interpret and apply regulatory updates not only demonstrates an awareness of the broader market context but also shows a commitment to ethical and sustainable business practices.

How to Answer: Discuss methods you use to stay informed, such as subscribing to industry newsletters, attending webinars, participating in professional networks, or following updates from regulatory bodies. Highlight instances where your proactive approach to regulatory changes has positively influenced your work or your team’s performance. For example, you might mention how identifying a new regulation early allowed you to adapt your compliance strategy, thereby avoiding potential fines and maintaining smooth operations. This showcases not just your knowledge but also your strategic thinking and adaptability.

Example: “I make it a habit to follow a combination of official regulatory websites, specialized news sources, and thought leaders in the cryptocurrency and financial sectors. This includes regularly checking updates from the SEC, CFTC, and international bodies like the FCA. I also subscribe to newsletters from legal firms that specialize in crypto regulations and participate in webinars and industry conferences.

In my last role, staying current allowed me to proactively adjust our compliance protocols before changes took effect. For example, when new AML requirements were announced, I quickly collaborated with our compliance team to update our KYC processes and ensure all client documentation was up to date. Staying ahead of these changes not only keeps us compliant but also builds trust with our clients, showing them that we prioritize their security and our regulatory obligations.”

6. Walk me through your process for organizing and prioritizing multiple administrative tasks in a fast-paced setting.

Balancing multiple administrative tasks in a fast-paced setting demands a high level of organization and prioritization, particularly in dynamic environments. Companies like Kraken need to ensure that their employees can effectively manage their workloads without sacrificing accuracy or efficiency. This question is designed to assess your ability to stay structured and maintain focus amid chaos, ensuring that critical tasks are not overlooked and deadlines are met. It also provides insight into your problem-solving skills and ability to adapt to rapidly changing situations.

How to Answer: Detail your strategies and tools for task management, such as using project management software, setting clear priorities, and maintaining a detailed calendar. Highlight experiences where you successfully juggled multiple responsibilities and how you adapted when priorities shifted unexpectedly. Mention any methodologies you follow, like the Eisenhower Matrix or time-blocking, to show a structured approach. Tailor your response to reflect an understanding of the fast-paced, high-stakes environment at Kraken, emphasizing your ability to thrive in such conditions.

Example: “First, I start by making a comprehensive to-do list, breaking down larger tasks into manageable steps. Then, I prioritize these tasks based on deadlines, complexity, and overall impact. I use a combination of digital tools like Trello for visual task management and Google Calendar for scheduling.

I check my task list at the start of each day and re-prioritize as needed, especially in a fast-paced setting where things can change rapidly. For urgent, high-impact tasks, I allocate focused blocks of time and eliminate distractions. If multiple tasks are of equal priority, I use the Eisenhower Matrix to decide what to tackle first. I also build in buffer time for unexpected tasks or issues that pop up. This approach allows me to stay organized, maintain flexibility, and ensure I’m always working on what’s most crucial at any given moment.”

7. How would you handle a situation where a customer is irate about a delayed transaction on our platform?

Dealing with irate customers, especially in a high-stakes environment like digital asset exchanges, demands a unique blend of technical knowledge, emotional intelligence, and crisis management skills. When a transaction is delayed, the customer may feel anxious or even distrustful, given the financial implications and the volatility of digital assets. Demonstrating your ability to handle such situations reflects your competence in maintaining the integrity and trust that are paramount in the crypto industry. It also shows that you can act as a stabilizing force, ensuring that customer concerns are addressed promptly and effectively, thus preserving the company’s reputation and customer loyalty.

How to Answer: Emphasize your approach to active listening and empathetic communication. Explain how you would first acknowledge the customer’s frustration and reassure them that their issue is being taken seriously. Detail your steps for investigating the problem, providing clear and honest updates throughout the process. Highlight any experience you have with similar situations, and how you successfully resolved them. This approach not only showcases your problem-solving abilities but also your commitment to customer satisfaction and your understanding of the operational intricacies within a digital asset exchange.

Example: “First, I’d make sure to acknowledge the customer’s frustration and empathize with their situation. It’s important they feel heard. I’d calmly assure them that I’m there to help resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Then, I’d gather all necessary details, such as the transaction ID and any relevant timestamps, to investigate the cause of the delay.

Once I have a clear understanding of the problem, I’d explain the situation to the customer in straightforward terms, avoiding any technical jargon that could confuse them further. If the delay was due to an internal issue, I’d provide an honest timeline for resolution and offer regular updates. To ease their concerns, I’d also discuss any measures Kraken is taking to prevent future delays. Throughout the entire process, maintaining open and transparent communication is key to rebuilding their trust in our platform.”

8. Describe how you would implement a machine learning algorithm to improve fraud detection.

In the realm of digital asset exchanges, the security of transactions is paramount, making fraud detection a critical focus. When an interviewer asks about implementing a machine learning algorithm for this purpose, they are delving into your understanding of both the technical and practical aspects of the problem. They are interested in your ability to navigate the complexities of data, identify patterns, and create predictive models that can adapt to new types of fraud. This question also touches on your problem-solving skills, your approach to handling vast amounts of transactional data, and your knowledge of the latest advancements in machine learning.

How to Answer: Start by outlining your understanding of the specific types of fraud that are prevalent in digital asset exchanges. Discuss the data sources you would use, such as transactional records, user behaviors, and historical fraud cases. Explain the steps you would take to preprocess and clean this data, ensuring it is suitable for training a machine learning model. Describe the algorithm you would choose, such as a neural network or a random forest, and justify your choice based on its suitability for detecting anomalies in financial transactions. Finally, detail how you would evaluate the model’s performance, monitor its effectiveness over time, and continuously update it to adapt to evolving fraud tactics. This comprehensive approach demonstrates your technical expertise and your strategic thinking, both of which are essential for roles focused on enhancing the security of digital asset exchanges.

Example: “First, I’d begin by gathering and preparing a comprehensive dataset of historical transactions, including those flagged as fraudulent and non-fraudulent. This would ensure the model has a robust training set. I’d focus on feature engineering to identify key indicators of fraudulent behavior, such as transaction velocity, amount anomalies, and geolocation inconsistencies.

Once the data is prepared, I’d choose an appropriate algorithm—likely a combination of supervised learning methods like Random Forest or Gradient Boosting, along with unsupervised learning techniques like clustering for anomaly detection. I’d train the model using the preprocessed data, continuously fine-tuning it to minimize false positives and negatives. After initial deployment, I’d implement a feedback loop where flagged transactions are reviewed and used to further refine the model, ensuring it adapts to new fraud patterns over time. Regular monitoring and updating would be crucial to maintain its effectiveness.”

9. What techniques do you use to assess cultural fit during the recruitment process?

Evaluating cultural fit during the recruitment process is crucial, especially in dynamic and innovative companies like Kraken, where maintaining a cohesive and collaborative work environment is essential for success. This question aims to understand your awareness of the company’s culture and how you ensure that new hires will align with and contribute positively to it. Cultural fit can impact everything from team synergy to overall productivity and employee retention, so demonstrating your ability to identify candidates who will thrive in such an environment is vital.

How to Answer: Discuss techniques you use, such as behavioral interviewing, situational judgment tests, or cultural assessment tools. Highlight your experience in aligning candidates’ values, attitudes, and behaviors with the company’s core values and work culture. You might mention how you incorporate feedback from team members or use real-life scenarios to gauge how candidates might interact in the workplace. This shows that you not only understand the importance of cultural fit but also have a strategic approach to ensuring it.

Example: “I focus on open-ended questions that reveal the candidate’s values and work style. For instance, I might ask them to describe their ideal work environment or how they handle failure. I also pay close attention to how they talk about teamwork and collaboration, as these are key in our company culture.

Once, I asked a candidate to share a story about a time they advocated for a project they were passionate about. Their response not only showed their initiative but also how they navigated company politics and rallied their team. This helped me gauge whether they’d thrive in our fast-paced, collaborative environment. Additionally, involving team members in the interview process provides different perspectives, ensuring a well-rounded assessment of cultural fit.”

10. How would you manage a team of developers working on a new blockchain feature?

Effective management of a team of developers working on complex projects like new blockchain features requires a blend of technical understanding, leadership skills, and strategic vision. This question delves into your ability to orchestrate a collaborative environment where innovation thrives, while also maintaining a clear roadmap and ensuring that milestones are met. It also assesses how you handle the dynamic nature of blockchain technology, where rapid changes and high stakes are the norm. Your approach to fostering communication, addressing challenges, and leveraging the strengths of each team member can significantly impact the project’s success and, by extension, the company’s competitive edge.

How to Answer: Highlight your experience with agile methodologies, your ability to break down complex tasks into manageable sprints, and your strategies for maintaining high morale and productivity. Discuss any past experience where you successfully led a similar project, emphasizing your problem-solving skills and how you navigated any setbacks. Mentioning specific tools or frameworks you’ve used to manage project timelines and quality can also demonstrate your preparedness for the role. For example, referencing how you’ve utilized platforms like Jira for project management or Git for version control could resonate well in a tech-savvy environment.

Example: “First, I’d ensure the team has a clear understanding of the project’s objectives and how their work ties into the overall vision of Kraken. Setting clear, achievable milestones helps everyone stay aligned and focused. I believe in fostering an environment of open communication, so I’d establish regular check-ins and create channels where developers feel comfortable sharing their progress and any roadblocks they encounter.

In a previous role, I managed a similar project where we were developing a new feature for a financial software platform. I implemented agile methodologies, held daily stand-ups, and used tools like Jira to track progress and manage tasks. This approach kept the team agile and responsive to any changes or challenges that arose. It’s crucial to strike a balance between giving the team autonomy to innovate and providing the guidance they need to stay on track. Regular code reviews and collaborative problem-solving sessions also ensure that we maintain high-quality standards and integrate everyone’s expertise effectively.”

11. What steps would you take to ensure compliance with international anti-money laundering laws?

Ensuring compliance with international anti-money laundering (AML) laws is essential for any digital asset exchange, as it directly impacts the integrity and trustworthiness of the platform. This question delves into your understanding of the complex regulatory landscape and your ability to implement robust compliance measures. It’s not just about following rules; it’s about proactively identifying and mitigating risks associated with illicit activities that could compromise the platform’s credibility and user trust. Demonstrating a strategic approach to compliance indicates that you recognize the importance of safeguarding the platform from legal and reputational risks while fostering a secure trading environment.

How to Answer: Outline a multi-faceted approach that includes staying updated on global regulatory changes, conducting thorough risk assessments, and implementing comprehensive monitoring systems. Highlight your experience with tools and technologies that aid in detecting suspicious activities and your ability to collaborate with legal and compliance teams to develop and enforce AML policies. Emphasize the importance of continuous training and education for staff to ensure everyone is aligned with compliance objectives. This will show your commitment to maintaining the platform’s compliance and security standards.

Example: “First, I’d start by conducting a thorough risk assessment to identify any vulnerabilities in our current processes. This would involve closely scrutinizing customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, and reporting mechanisms. Based on these findings, I’d update and enforce robust KYC procedures to ensure we’re accurately verifying customer identities and assessing risk profiles.

I would also implement an ongoing training program for staff to keep everyone informed about the latest regulatory changes and best practices. This includes setting up a robust transaction monitoring system that uses advanced analytics to flag suspicious activities in real-time. Finally, I’d establish a regular audit schedule to review and fine-tune our compliance strategies, ensuring we stay ahead of any potential issues. Working at my previous role in financial services, I found these steps not only met compliance requirements but also built trust with our customers and partners.”

12. How would you streamline the onboarding process for new employees to ensure they are productive as quickly as possible?

Efficient onboarding is essential for fast-paced and technologically advanced companies. At Kraken, the onboarding process isn’t just about getting new hires up to speed; it’s about integrating them into a complex ecosystem where rapid adaptation and deep understanding of both the technology and the regulatory landscape are crucial. This question seeks to identify if you can not only think critically about process improvements but also understand the specific challenges that come with onboarding in a high-stakes, highly-regulated environment. It’s about evaluating your ability to balance speed with compliance and thoroughness, ensuring new employees can contribute meaningfully without compromising on security or quality.

How to Answer: Highlight your ability to create structured yet flexible onboarding programs that cater to various learning styles and backgrounds. Discuss how you would incorporate technology and mentorship to accelerate learning while maintaining high standards. Mention specific tools or methodologies that have worked for you in the past, and tailor your response to show an understanding of Kraken’s unique operational needs. Demonstrating your capacity to blend efficiency with thoroughness will position you as someone who can enhance the onboarding experience in a way that aligns with Kraken’s strategic goals.

Example: “First, I would develop a comprehensive and interactive onboarding toolkit that includes everything from company culture and values to detailed job-specific training materials. I’d collaborate with HR and team leaders to ensure we’re covering all bases and that the content is engaging and easy to digest.

Next, I’d implement a mentorship program where each new hire is paired with an experienced team member. This provides them with a go-to person for questions and helps them integrate more quickly into the team. Additionally, I’d set up a series of small, focused workshops over the first month, covering essential tools and processes they’ll need to hit the ground running. This combination of structured learning and personal support ensures new employees can start contributing effectively from day one.”

13. Explain your approach to resolving a complex customer service issue that involves multiple departments.

Addressing a complex customer service issue that involves multiple departments requires a blend of problem-solving skills, effective communication, and cross-functional collaboration. Companies like Kraken, which operate in highly regulated and fast-paced environments, value candidates who can demonstrate the ability to navigate intricate organizational structures while maintaining a focus on customer satisfaction. The question aims to reveal how you prioritize tasks, manage resources, and coordinate with various teams to deliver a seamless resolution. Your answer should reflect your ability to understand the broader implications of the issue, such as regulatory compliance, and the importance of maintaining trust and transparency with the customer throughout the process.

How to Answer: Provide a specific example where you successfully managed a multi-departmental customer service issue. Highlight your initial assessment of the problem, the steps you took to engage relevant stakeholders, and how you ensured clear and consistent communication across all parties involved. Emphasize the strategies you employed to keep the customer informed and satisfied, and describe the outcome, focusing on how your actions contributed to a positive resolution. This approach will demonstrate your capability to handle complex scenarios in a way that aligns with the operational standards and customer-centric values of Kraken Digital Asset Exchange.

Example: “I would start by thoroughly understanding the customer’s issue and gathering all necessary information. Once I have a clear picture, I would identify which departments need to be involved. For example, if a customer is having trouble with a transaction that didn’t go through but funds were still deducted, I’d loop in both the payments team and the technical support team.

I’d then facilitate a collaborative meeting or thread where all relevant parties can contribute their expertise. Clear communication is key, so I’d ensure everyone understands their role in resolving the issue. I’d keep the customer informed throughout the process, providing updates and setting realistic expectations. Once we have a resolution, I’d follow up with the customer to ensure they are satisfied and offer any additional support they might need. This approach not only resolves the issue but also builds trust and ensures a smoother process for any future complexities.”

14. How do you prioritize feature requests from users while maintaining the strategic goals of the product?

Balancing user feature requests with the strategic goals of a product requires a nuanced understanding of both customer needs and long-term vision. This question delves into your ability to navigate through competing demands, ensuring that immediate user feedback does not derail the overarching objectives of the product roadmap. At a sophisticated operation like Kraken, where the user base is knowledgeable and vocal, this equilibrium is particularly crucial. Your response will demonstrate your capability to synthesize user input, assess its alignment with strategic goals, and make informed decisions that drive the product forward without compromising its core mission.

How to Answer: Articulate a methodical approach to prioritization. Discuss frameworks or tools you use to evaluate user requests, such as impact versus effort matrices or customer value assessments. Illustrate your process with a specific example where you successfully balanced user demands with strategic imperatives, highlighting how you communicated decisions to stakeholders. Emphasize your ability to maintain a user-centric focus while safeguarding the product’s long-term vision, showcasing both your analytical skills and strategic thinking.

Example: “To prioritize feature requests, I start by aligning them with our overarching product strategy and business goals. I use a combination of customer impact, feasibility, and alignment with our long-term vision to evaluate each request. For instance, if a feature request comes in that would significantly improve user experience but requires considerable development time, I’ll weigh it against other requests to see if it provides a greater overall benefit.

I also believe in maintaining an open line of communication with both users and internal teams. Gathering input from customer support, sales, and directly from user feedback helps in understanding the real-world impact of these requests. In a previous role at a fintech startup, we had a request for a new dashboard feature that many users were asking for. I organized a meeting with the development team and key stakeholders to discuss its feasibility and how it fit into our product roadmap. We ultimately decided to implement it because it aligned well with our goal of enhancing user engagement and could be rolled out in a reasonable timeframe. This approach ensures that we’re not just reacting to every request but making thoughtful decisions that drive the product forward.”

15. Describe your methodology for planning and executing a large-scale project within budget and time constraints.

Effectively planning and executing a large-scale project within budget and time constraints is essential, especially in an environment where the stakes are high and precision is non-negotiable. At a company like Kraken, where digital asset transactions require meticulous attention to detail and adherence to strict timelines, the ability to manage complex projects successfully is crucial. They want to understand your approach to breaking down a project into manageable tasks, your strategies for resource allocation, risk management, and how you ensure seamless communication across teams. Demonstrating a robust methodology reflects your capacity to deliver high-quality results while navigating the dynamic challenges of the digital asset space.

How to Answer: Outline your step-by-step process, starting from initial planning stages, such as defining scope and objectives, to developing a detailed project timeline. Highlight your experience with tools or frameworks that aid in project management, like Agile or Scrum, and emphasize how you monitor progress and adjust plans to stay within budget and on schedule. Use specific examples to illustrate your problem-solving skills and your ability to lead a team through complex, high-pressure situations. This will show your prospective employers that you are not only organized and strategic but also resilient and adaptable, qualities that are invaluable in the fast-paced world of digital asset exchange.

Example: “I start by breaking down the project into smaller, manageable tasks and establishing clear milestones. This involves detailed scope planning and prioritizing tasks based on their impact and dependencies. I always use robust project management tools like Asana or Jira to keep everything organized and transparent for the team.

Communication is key, so I schedule regular check-ins and status updates to ensure we’re on track and to adjust timelines or resources as needed. For example, in my last role, we were tasked with launching a new feature for a trading platform within three months. By assigning clear roles, maintaining open communication, and closely monitoring both progress and budget, we were not only able to meet the deadline but also came in 5% under budget. This structured yet flexible approach helps me ensure that projects stay on track and within constraints.”

16. How would you automate repetitive tasks to enhance operational efficiency?

Automation of repetitive tasks is crucial for operational efficiency, especially in a high-paced, data-intensive environment. By reducing manual effort, you free up human resources to focus on more complex, value-adding activities. In the context of a digital asset exchange like Kraken, where accuracy, speed, and scalability are paramount, automation can significantly minimize errors, improve transaction processing times, and enhance the overall user experience. This question helps assess your technical acumen, problem-solving skills, and ability to implement scalable solutions that can handle the massive volume of transactions and data Kraken deals with daily.

How to Answer: Illustrate your familiarity with automation tools and scripts, such as Python, RPA (Robotic Process Automation), or even custom algorithms. Provide a specific example of a task you automated in a previous role, detailing the tools you used, the process you followed, and the tangible benefits achieved. For instance, you might describe how you automated data extraction and validation processes, which reduced errors by 30% and saved 20 hours of manual work per week. This demonstrates not only your technical skills but also your ability to identify inefficiencies and take proactive measures to address them.

Example: “First, I’d assess which tasks are most time-consuming and repetitive, and determine which of those could be automated without compromising quality. I’d likely start with something like data entry or routine status reports, where the process is standardized and predictable.

In a previous role, I identified that our customer support team was spending a significant amount of time manually updating ticket statuses and sending follow-up emails. I collaborated with the IT department to implement a workflow automation tool that integrated with our CRM. I mapped out the process, set up triggers for status changes, and created templates for follow-up communications. This reduced the time spent on these tasks by about 40%, allowing the team to focus more on complex support issues and customer engagement. I’d take a similar approach here by identifying key areas for automation and collaborating with the relevant teams to implement efficient solutions.”

17. Explain how you would conduct a market analysis to identify opportunities for new digital asset products.

Conducting a market analysis for new digital asset products requires a deep understanding of both market trends and consumer behavior. In the context of a company like Kraken, this question probes your ability to synthesize large data sets, recognize emerging trends in the digital asset space, and pinpoint gaps where new products could thrive. It also touches on your familiarity with regulatory landscapes, competitive analysis, and technological advancements that can influence market opportunities. Kraken, which operates in a highly dynamic and innovative sector, is interested in how you can leverage data-driven insights to identify and capitalize on untapped market potential.

How to Answer: Outline a structured approach that showcases your analytical skills and strategic thinking. Start by discussing how you would gather data from various sources, including market reports, social media trends, and competitor activities. Explain the tools and methodologies you would use to analyze this data, such as SWOT analysis, PESTEL analysis, or Porter’s Five Forces. Highlight your ability to interpret complex data and translate it into actionable insights, and discuss how you would validate your findings through stakeholder consultations or pilot testing. Emphasize your understanding of the digital asset landscape and your ability to foresee future trends, ensuring your response aligns with Kraken’s innovative and data-centric culture.

Example: “First, I would start by gathering data from various sources such as market reports, social media trends, and industry news to get a comprehensive view of the current landscape. I’d pay particular attention to emerging trends, regulatory changes, and technological advancements that could influence the market.

Next, I’d analyze the competitive landscape by identifying key players, their product offerings, and market share. I’d look for gaps in the market where customer needs aren’t being fully met. To validate these gaps, I’d conduct surveys and focus groups with potential users to gauge interest and gather qualitative insights. Combining this data with quantitative metrics like trading volumes and price trends, I’d then prioritize the opportunities based on factors like potential market size, ease of entry, and alignment with Kraken’s strategic goals. This comprehensive approach ensures that we’re not just following trends but creating products that genuinely meet user needs and add value to the market.”

18. What is your approach to risk management when dealing with client transactions in volatile markets?

Evaluating risk management approaches in volatile markets is essential for maintaining client trust and financial stability. At Kraken, where market fluctuations can be extreme and rapid, understanding how to mitigate risks is crucial. This question assesses your ability to foresee potential pitfalls, employ strategies to minimize losses, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. It also reveals your problem-solving skills and how you navigate high-pressure situations, which are vital in an environment where decisions can have significant financial repercussions.

How to Answer: Detail your specific methodologies for risk assessment and management. Highlight any tools or frameworks you use, such as stress testing, scenario analysis, or real-time monitoring systems. Discuss your experience with maintaining a balance between risk and reward, and provide examples of how you’ve successfully protected client assets in the past. Emphasize your commitment to continuous learning and staying updated on market trends and regulatory changes, showcasing your proactive approach to safeguarding both the client’s and the company’s interests.

Example: “I prioritize a proactive approach by constantly monitoring market trends and setting up automated alerts for significant price movements. Establishing clear protocols with clients about volatility expectations and potential risks is crucial. I always make sure clients understand the importance of setting stop-loss orders and diversifying their portfolios to mitigate risk.

For instance, when Bitcoin had significant fluctuations last year, I implemented a strategy with a client that combined real-time monitoring with pre-set thresholds for automated sell orders. This approach helped us minimize losses and even capitalize on some market rebounds. By staying informed and maintaining clear communication with clients, I ensure that we can navigate volatile markets effectively and with confidence.”

19. How do you ensure code quality and consistency across a distributed development team?

Ensuring code quality and consistency in a distributed development team is vital to maintaining a cohesive and efficient workflow, especially in complex environments such as those dealing with digital asset exchanges. The question seeks to understand your strategies for overcoming the inherent challenges of remote collaboration, where communication gaps and varying coding standards can lead to fragmented and unreliable codebases. Demonstrating a robust approach to maintaining high standards across different time zones and cultures is crucial, as it reflects your ability to uphold the technical integrity and reliability expected in high-stakes settings like Kraken.

How to Answer: Emphasize the importance of implementing standardized coding practices, such as code reviews, automated testing, and continuous integration pipelines. Discuss how you foster an environment of open communication and collaboration through regular virtual meetings, documentation, and shared repositories. Highlight any tools or platforms you use to synchronize efforts and ensure everyone on the team adheres to the same quality benchmarks. This shows your proactive approach to mitigating the challenges of distributed development and your commitment to delivering high-quality, consistent code.

Example: “First, I emphasize the importance of clear and consistent coding standards. At the beginning of any project, I make sure everyone on the team is aligned by setting up a comprehensive style guide that outlines best practices, naming conventions, and code formatting rules. We usually use tools like ESLint or Prettier to automate adherence to these standards.

To maintain quality, I advocate for regular code reviews and pair programming sessions. This not only catches potential issues early but also fosters knowledge sharing across the team. We also rely on continuous integration pipelines to run automated tests and linters, so any deviations from our quality standards are flagged immediately. In a distributed environment, communication is key, so we make good use of tools like Slack or Microsoft Teams for quick questions and detailed discussions, and set regular video check-ins to keep everyone on the same page. This approach ensures that everyone feels accountable and engaged, regardless of their physical location.”

20. Describe your strategy for building and managing a high-performing compliance team.

A high-performing compliance team is essential for ensuring that a company like Kraken adheres to regulatory requirements, mitigates risks, and maintains its reputation in a highly scrutinized industry. This question digs into your ability to understand and navigate the complexities of regulatory environments, craft a cohesive strategy, and lead a team that can proactively address compliance issues. It’s not just about technical knowledge but also about fostering a culture of integrity and accountability within the team. Your approach to building and managing this team reflects your leadership style, your grasp of compliance nuances, and your ability to align team objectives with broader organizational goals.

How to Answer: Discuss strategies for recruiting individuals with strong regulatory knowledge and ethical standards, and explain how you foster continuous learning and development within the team. Highlight your methods for ensuring clear communication, setting measurable goals, and creating a collaborative environment where team members feel empowered to voice concerns and suggest improvements. Demonstrating a nuanced understanding of compliance challenges and showcasing your ability to lead a team through these challenges will resonate well with the interviewers.

Example: “First, I focus on hiring the right talent by looking for individuals who are not only skilled but also have a strong understanding of regulatory landscapes and a passion for the fintech industry. I prioritize diversity in backgrounds and experiences to ensure a well-rounded team. Once assembled, I set clear expectations and establish robust training programs to keep everyone updated on the latest compliance requirements and industry trends.

I foster a collaborative environment where team members feel comfortable sharing insights and challenges. Regular check-ins and performance reviews are crucial to ensure we’re meeting our goals and to provide opportunities for professional growth. I also believe in leveraging technology to automate routine tasks, allowing the team to focus on more complex issues. By creating a culture of continuous improvement and open communication, I ensure that the team remains agile and effective in navigating the ever-evolving regulatory landscape.”

21. How would you handle confidential information in a highly sensitive financial environment?

Confidentiality in a highly sensitive financial environment demands a nuanced understanding of both ethical considerations and regulatory compliance. At Kraken, where transactions and financial data are highly scrutinized, mishandling sensitive information can have far-reaching consequences, including legal ramifications and loss of client trust. It’s crucial to demonstrate a deep awareness of the protocols and best practices for safeguarding data, as well as an ability to navigate the complexities of information security in the digital asset space. This question seeks to measure your commitment to maintaining the highest standards of confidentiality and your capability to operate within stringent regulatory frameworks.

How to Answer: Emphasize your familiarity with information security protocols and relevant regulations, such as GDPR or other financial compliance standards. Illustrate your answer with specific examples from past experiences where you successfully protected sensitive information, highlighting any advanced security measures or practices you implemented. Make sure to convey your understanding of the importance of confidentiality in maintaining the integrity and trustworthiness of a financial institution like Kraken Digital Asset Exchange. This will show that you are not only aware of the high stakes involved but also prepared to uphold the stringent standards required in this environment.

Example: “Handling confidential information in a highly sensitive financial environment starts with understanding and adhering to all company protocols and industry regulations, like GDPR and AML laws. First, I would always ensure that I’m following the principle of least privilege, meaning I would only access information necessary for my role and tasks. Additionally, I would use secure communication channels and encrypted storage solutions for any data transfer or storage.

In a previous role, I worked at a fintech startup where we were handling sensitive customer data. I made it a point to regularly participate in security training sessions and stay updated on best practices. I also advocated for the implementation of two-factor authentication for any systems storing sensitive information, which significantly enhanced our security posture. Ensuring regular audits and being vigilant about phishing attempts were also key aspects of my approach. Maintaining a culture of security awareness and continuous improvement is essential in protecting confidential information effectively.”

22. Explain how you would optimize customer support workflows to reduce response times.

Reducing response times in customer support workflows is essential for maintaining a high standard of service and customer satisfaction. At companies like Kraken, where transactions and inquiries can be time-sensitive, delays can lead to significant customer frustration and potential financial impact. This question assesses your ability to identify inefficiencies, implement technological solutions, and streamline processes to ensure that customer inquiries are handled swiftly and effectively. It also evaluates your understanding of industry-specific challenges and your capability to adapt to a fast-paced, high-stakes environment.

How to Answer: Highlight your experience with workflow optimization tools and methodologies, such as automation software, AI-driven chatbots, and efficient ticket triaging systems. Discuss specific examples where you have successfully reduced response times by reorganizing team structures, implementing new technologies, or refining existing processes. Emphasize your analytical skills in identifying bottlenecks and your proactive approach to continuous improvement. This will demonstrate not only your technical acumen but also your strategic thinking and commitment to enhancing customer experience.

Example: “First, I’d analyze our current support ticket data to identify common issues and peak times for inquiries. Then, I’d implement a tiered support system where basic queries are handled by a robust FAQ section and AI-powered chatbots, freeing up human agents to focus on more complex problems.

Additionally, I’d ensure our team has thorough training on the most frequent issues and set up a knowledge-sharing platform where agents can quickly find solutions based on past cases. Finally, integrating a seamless omnichannel support system would allow customers to transition smoothly between chat, email, and phone, without having to repeat their issues, thereby speeding up resolution times and improving overall customer satisfaction.”

23. What methods would you use to integrate third-party APIs into our existing infrastructure?

Integrating third-party APIs into an existing infrastructure demands a nuanced understanding of both the external service and the internal system’s architecture. At a company like Kraken, this process is critical as it impacts the security, scalability, and reliability of their platform. The ability to seamlessly incorporate APIs without disrupting the existing services demonstrates technical proficiency and an understanding of the potential challenges such as compatibility issues, data integrity, and latency. This question also assesses how well you can foresee and mitigate risks associated with third-party integrations, which is crucial for maintaining the robustness of a high-stakes platform.

How to Answer: Outline a clear, methodical approach that includes initial research and compatibility checks, sandbox testing, implementation strategies, and continuous monitoring. Highlight any experience with specific tools or frameworks that facilitate API integration and stress the importance of adhering to best practices for security and data management. Additionally, discussing how you would coordinate with cross-functional teams to ensure a smooth integration process can showcase your collaborative skills and your ability to work within a complex organizational structure.

Example: “First, I would start by thoroughly reviewing the documentation of the third-party API to understand its capabilities, limitations, and authentication requirements. After that, I would evaluate our existing infrastructure to identify the best integration points and ensure compatibility.

Once I have a clear understanding, I would create a detailed plan that includes setting up a sandbox environment for testing, implementing authentication protocols, and mapping out data flows between the API and our system. During the integration, I would use error handling and logging mechanisms to troubleshoot any issues that arise and ensure smooth data transfer. Finally, I would conduct rigorous testing to confirm that the integration meets all functional and security requirements before deploying it to the production environment. In a previous role, using this structured approach helped me seamlessly integrate a payment gateway, which significantly improved our transaction processing efficiency.”

24. How do you measure the success of recruitment campaigns and adjust them for better results?

Measuring the success of recruitment campaigns and adjusting them for better results is paramount in organizations where talent acquisition drives innovation and competitive advantage. Companies like Kraken, which operate in fast-paced and highly specialized industries, rely on effective recruitment strategies to attract top-tier talent that aligns with their technical and cultural needs. When candidates are asked about this, it’s to understand their analytical capabilities and their ability to adapt strategies based on data-driven insights. This involves not just tracking basic metrics like the number of applicants or time-to-hire, but also evaluating the quality of hires, retention rates, and how well new employees integrate and perform within the company. The ability to iterate on recruitment strategies using advanced analytics and feedback loops ensures that the company remains agile and continues to attract high-caliber talent in a competitive market.

How to Answer: Articulate specific metrics you’ve used in past roles, such as conversion rates from application to hire, employee performance post-hire, and retention rates. Emphasize your experience with tools and technologies that aid in tracking these metrics and how you’ve used this data to make informed decisions. Provide examples of adjustments you’ve made to recruitment campaigns, detailing the rationale behind these changes and the outcomes. Demonstrating a methodical approach to measuring success and a willingness to continuously optimize your strategies will resonate well with an organization that values precision and adaptability.

Example: “Success in recruitment campaigns is all about tracking the right metrics and being agile with strategy. I always start by defining clear, measurable objectives—whether it’s the number of quality candidates, time-to-hire, or cost-per-hire. I rely heavily on data analytics to gauge these metrics. For instance, if we’re not getting enough qualified candidates, I’ll look at our sourcing channels to see which ones are underperforming.

I remember a campaign where we were struggling to fill a niche technical role. After analyzing the data, I noticed that our job postings were getting views but not many applications. I revamped the job description to make it more engaging and specific to what the ideal candidate would be looking for. Additionally, I shifted some of our budget from general job boards to more specialized forums and communities. Within a month, we saw a 30% increase in qualified applicants, and we successfully filled the position. It’s about being data-driven but adaptable to what the data is telling you.”

25. Describe your approach to mentoring junior team members in a technical role.

Mentoring junior team members in a technical role goes beyond just imparting knowledge; it involves fostering an environment where continuous learning, curiosity, and growth are prioritized. In a highly technical and rapidly evolving field like digital asset exchange, mentorship helps build a resilient team capable of adapting to new challenges and technologies. At Kraken, where innovation and precision are key, effective mentorship ensures that new team members are not only up to speed with current technologies but are also prepared to contribute to future advancements. This question aims to understand your ability to guide, inspire, and cultivate talent within a specialized and dynamic setting.

How to Answer: Highlight specific strategies you use to mentor effectively, such as pairing junior members with experienced ones for hands-on learning, providing regular feedback, and encouraging participation in decision-making processes. Share examples of how you’ve successfully mentored others in the past, focusing on the tangible outcomes that benefited both the individuals and the team. Emphasize your commitment to creating a supportive and inclusive environment that aligns with Kraken’s values of continuous improvement and excellence in the digital asset space.

Example: “My approach is to balance hands-on guidance with fostering independence. I start by understanding the junior team member’s current skill level and their learning style—some people learn best by doing, others by watching, and some by reading.

For instance, I had a junior developer who was struggling with debugging. I first walked them through a couple of debugging sessions, explaining my thought process and steps in real-time. Once they got the hang of it, I began giving them small, manageable bugs to fix on their own, always making sure that they felt comfortable asking questions. I encouraged them to think critically by asking them guiding questions rather than providing immediate solutions.

I also believe in setting up regular check-ins to discuss their progress, challenges, and any new skills they’d like to acquire. This kind of structured yet flexible approach has not only helped junior team members become more confident and proficient but has also built a stronger, more cohesive team overall.”

26. What steps would you take to develop a new feature that enhances user security on our platform?

Developing a new feature to enhance user security requires a meticulous approach, especially in the context of a digital asset exchange where user trust and data integrity are paramount. This question delves into your strategic thinking and problem-solving capabilities, emphasizing your understanding of the complexities involved in safeguarding digital assets. Beyond technical prowess, it examines your awareness of regulatory requirements, potential threats, and user behavior—all critical factors in maintaining a secure environment. At Kraken, where security breaches can have severe financial and reputational repercussions, demonstrating a comprehensive and proactive approach is essential.

How to Answer: Outline a structured plan starting with thorough research and risk assessment to identify potential vulnerabilities and requirements. Discuss collaboration with cross-functional teams, including cybersecurity experts, developers, and compliance officers, to ensure holistic development. Highlight the importance of iterative testing and user feedback to refine the feature, and emphasize the need for ongoing monitoring and updates post-launch. Concluding with how your approach ensures not only immediate security but also long-term resilience will showcase your readiness to contribute to Kraken’s mission of maintaining a secure and trustworthy platform.

Example: “First, I’d begin by collaborating closely with the security team to identify the most pressing vulnerabilities or areas for enhancement. This could involve thorough penetration testing and reviewing user feedback to pinpoint specific security concerns users have experienced. Once we’ve identified the focal points, I’d bring in the product and engineering teams to brainstorm potential solutions, ensuring that any proposed feature aligns with our existing architecture and user experience standards.

For example, in a previous role, we identified that multi-factor authentication (MFA) could significantly bolster security. I led the project by drafting a detailed specification and worked closely with the engineering team to integrate the feature smoothly without compromising user convenience. Throughout development, we ran multiple user testing sessions to ensure the feature was intuitive and didn’t disrupt the user experience. Post-launch, we monitored key metrics to measure the effectiveness and gathered user feedback for further refinements. This structured and collaborative approach would be my blueprint for developing any new security feature at Kraken.”

27. How do you handle conflicting priorities between different stakeholders in a project?

Balancing conflicting priorities between stakeholders is a crucial skill in any project-driven environment. This question delves into your ability to navigate complex dynamics where multiple interests and perspectives come into play. At a company like Kraken, where projects often involve diverse teams ranging from technical experts to regulatory authorities, understanding the intricacies of stakeholder management can be pivotal. Your response should reflect your ability to prioritize tasks, manage expectations, and communicate effectively to ensure that all parties are aligned towards a common goal. This insight not only demonstrates your project management skills but also your capacity to maintain harmony and drive projects to successful completion despite differing viewpoints.

How to Answer: Provide a specific example where you successfully managed conflicting priorities. Describe the situation, the stakeholders involved, and the conflicting interests. Detail the steps you took to understand each stakeholder’s perspective, how you communicated your plan, and how you prioritized tasks to meet the overarching objective. Highlight any tools or frameworks you used to facilitate this process, and emphasize the outcome, showcasing your ability to deliver results while maintaining strong relationships with all parties involved. This approach not only answers the question but also showcases your strategic thinking and interpersonal skills.

Example: “I prioritize by first understanding the core objectives and deadlines of each stakeholder. For instance, in my last role at a fintech startup, we had a project where the marketing team wanted to launch a campaign ASAP, while the product team needed more time to perfect the user experience. I started by facilitating a meeting with both teams to clearly outline their goals and constraints.

From there, I identified common ground and negotiated trade-offs. For example, we agreed to launch a smaller, teaser campaign that could run while the product team continued refining the user experience. This approach not only met the marketing team’s urgency but also ensured the product team had the extra time they needed. Open communication and setting clear expectations were key to balancing these conflicting priorities.”

28. What metrics would you track to evaluate the performance of client engagement initiatives?

Evaluating the performance of client engagement initiatives requires a nuanced understanding of both quantitative and qualitative metrics. Metrics such as Net Promoter Score (NPS), customer retention rates, and engagement levels on digital platforms provide insight into client satisfaction and loyalty. Additionally, tracking the time to resolution for client issues and the frequency of client interactions can reveal areas for improvement in service delivery. At Kraken, where user experience and security are paramount, understanding these metrics helps ensure that clients not only feel valued but also trust the platform with their digital assets.

How to Answer: Emphasize a balanced approach, combining hard data with client feedback to create a comprehensive view of engagement success. Mention specific tools or methodologies you have used in the past, such as customer feedback surveys, CRM analytics, or social listening tools, and how they have informed your strategies. Highlight any experience you have with blockchain or cryptocurrency platforms, as this shows a deeper understanding of the unique challenges and opportunities within the digital asset space.

Example: “I’d focus on a mix of quantitative and qualitative metrics. First, I’d look at client retention rates and churn rates, as these directly reflect how well we’re engaging and satisfying our clients. I’d also track Net Promoter Score (NPS) to gauge client loyalty and overall satisfaction.

On the more granular side, I’d monitor engagement rates on educational content, such as webinars and newsletters, to see if clients are actively interacting with the resources we’re providing. Additionally, I’d analyze support ticket resolution times and customer feedback to ensure our client service is up to par. By combining these metrics, we can get a holistic view of how well we’re connecting with and supporting our clients.”

29. Describe your process for conducting a comprehensive compliance audit.

Compliance audits are vital in the financial services industry, especially within digital asset exchanges, due to the stringent regulatory environment and the potential risks associated with non-compliance. An effective compliance audit process demonstrates your understanding of regulatory requirements, risk management, and internal controls, highlighting your ability to safeguard the company against legal and financial repercussions. This question aims to assess your systematic approach, attention to detail, and ability to adapt to evolving regulations, ensuring the company operates within legal frameworks and maintains trust with stakeholders.

How to Answer: Outline a clear, step-by-step process that includes initial planning, risk assessment, data collection, evaluation of internal controls, and reporting findings. Emphasize your methods for staying updated with regulatory changes, such as continuous education or industry engagement. Illustrate your answer with examples of past audits you have conducted, focusing on how you identified and addressed compliance gaps, collaborated with different departments, and implemented corrective actions. This approach not only demonstrates your technical expertise but also your proactive and collaborative mindset in maintaining regulatory compliance.

Example: “I start by defining the scope and objectives of the audit, making sure to align them with both regulatory requirements and the specific needs of the organization. Gathering all necessary documentation and data is my next step, including transaction records, user logs, and internal policies and procedures.

Once I have everything, I employ data analytics tools to identify any anomalies or red flags that warrant closer examination. I cross-reference these findings with the current regulatory framework to ensure every aspect of compliance is covered. After conducting interviews with key personnel to gain deeper insights, I compile a detailed report highlighting any compliance gaps, along with actionable recommendations. I also make sure to include a timeline for implementing these changes and schedule follow-up audits to ensure compliance improvements are sustained.”

30. How would you manage a sudden increase in customer inquiries due to a market event?

Handling a sudden surge in customer inquiries, especially during a market event, requires a blend of strategic planning, resource allocation, and effective communication. This scenario tests your ability to quickly assess the situation, prioritize tasks, and deploy resources efficiently to maintain a high standard of customer service. Companies like Kraken operate in volatile markets where rapid changes can trigger a flood of customer questions and concerns. Your ability to stay composed, lead a team under pressure, and ensure that customer issues are addressed promptly reflects your competence in crisis management and your commitment to customer satisfaction.

How to Answer: Highlight your experience with similar high-pressure situations and your approach to problem-solving. Discuss specific strategies you’ve used, such as implementing automated responses for common inquiries, temporarily reassigning team members to handle the increased volume, or using data analytics to predict and manage the flow of inquiries. Emphasize your ability to maintain clear and calm communication with both your team and customers, ensuring that everyone remains informed and that issues are resolved efficiently. This demonstrates your preparedness and resilience, which are crucial for thriving in dynamic environments like the digital asset exchange market.

Example: “First, I’d prioritize clear and timely communication both internally and externally. Internally, I’d quickly gather the support team to assess our current capacity and identify any additional resources we might need, such as temporarily reallocating staff from other departments or bringing in part-time help.

Externally, I’d ensure that our customers are kept in the loop by updating our social media channels, website, and email newsletters with information about the market event and expected response times. I’d also implement a triage system to categorize inquiries based on urgency and complexity, ensuring that the most critical issues are addressed first. In a previous role, a sudden surge in inquiries was successfully managed by using these strategies, resulting in a smoother customer experience and maintaining our team’s efficiency.”

30 Common Brown Brothers Harriman Interview Questions & Answers

30 common cantor fitzgerald interview questions & answers, you may also be interested in..., 30 common stifel financial interview questions & answers, 30 common crowe interview questions & answers, 30 common ramsey solutions interview questions & answers, 30 common morgan and morgan interview questions & answers.

Kraken interview questions.

• 600K+ questions
• Recent submissions
• 1092 Kraken questions
• Employee-verified
• 600,000+ questions and growing
• Submitted by recent candidates
• Verified by current employees
• 1092 questions for Kraken

⚡️ Reported recently

21 days ago

a month ago

2 months ago

3 months ago

4 months ago

Add recent questions that you are aware of. This question bank only stays relevant with your help.

Consistency gets you there

We'll send you a question to practice every week.

Showing 1 to 10 of 1092 results

* All interview questions are submitted by recent Kraken candidates, labelled and categorized by Prepfully, and then published after verification by current and ex-Kraken employees .

47 case interview examples (from McKinsey, BCG, Bain, etc.)

One of the best ways to prepare for   case interviews  at firms like McKinsey, BCG, or Bain, is by studying case interview examples. 

There are a lot of free sample cases out there, but it's really hard to know where to start. So in this article, we have listed all the best free case examples available, in one place.

The below list of resources includes interactive case interview samples provided by consulting firms, video case interview demonstrations, case books, and materials developed by the team here at IGotAnOffer. Let's continue to the list.

• McKinsey examples
• BCG examples
• Bain examples
• Deloitte examples
• Other firms' examples
• Case books from consulting clubs
• Case interview preparation

Click here to practise 1-on-1 with MBB ex-interviewers

1. mckinsey case interview examples.

• Beautify case interview (McKinsey website)
• Diconsa case interview (McKinsey website)
• Electro-light case interview (McKinsey website)
• GlobaPharm case interview (McKinsey website)
• National Education case interview (McKinsey website)
• Talbot Trucks case interview (McKinsey website)
• Shops Corporation case interview (McKinsey website)
• Conservation Forever case interview (McKinsey website)
• McKinsey case interview guide (by IGotAnOffer)
• McKinsey live case interview extract (by IGotAnOffer) - See below

2. BCG case interview examples

• Foods Inc and GenCo case samples  (BCG website)
• Chateau Boomerang written case interview  (BCG website)
• BCG case interview guide (by IGotAnOffer)
• Written cases guide (by IGotAnOffer)
• BCG live case interview with notes (by IGotAnOffer)
• BCG mock case interview with ex-BCG associate director - Public sector case (by IGotAnOffer)
• BCG mock case interview: Revenue problem case (by IGotAnOffer) - See below

3. Bain case interview examples

• CoffeeCo practice case (Bain website)
• FashionCo practice case (Bain website)
• Associate Consultant mock interview video (Bain website)
• Consultant mock interview video (Bain website)
• Written case interview tips (Bain website)
• Bain case interview guide   (by IGotAnOffer)
• Digital transformation case with ex-Bain consultant
• Bain case mock interview with ex-Bain manager (below)

4. Deloitte case interview examples

• Engagement Strategy practice case (Deloitte website)
• Recreation Unlimited practice case (Deloitte website)
• Strategic Vision practice case (Deloitte website)
• Retail Strategy practice case  (Deloitte website)
• Finance Strategy practice case  (Deloitte website)
• Talent Management practice case (Deloitte website)
• Enterprise Resource Management practice case (Deloitte website)
• Footloose written case  (by Deloitte)
• Deloitte case interview guide (by IGotAnOffer)

5. Accenture case interview examples

• Case interview workbook (by Accenture)
• Accenture case interview guide (by IGotAnOffer)

6. OC&C case interview examples

• Leisure Club case example (by OC&C)
• Imported Spirits case example (by OC&C)

7. Oliver Wyman case interview examples

• Wumbleworld case sample (Oliver Wyman website)
• Aqualine case sample (Oliver Wyman website)
• Oliver Wyman case interview guide (by IGotAnOffer)

8. A.T. Kearney case interview examples

• Promotion planning case question (A.T. Kearney website)
• Consulting case book and examples (by A.T. Kearney)
• AT Kearney case interview guide (by IGotAnOffer)

9. Strategy& / PWC case interview examples

• Presentation overview with sample questions (by Strategy& / PWC)
• Strategy& / PWC case interview guide (by IGotAnOffer)

10. L.E.K. Consulting case interview examples

• Case interview example video walkthrough   (L.E.K. website)
• Market sizing case example video walkthrough  (L.E.K. website)

11. Roland Berger case interview examples

• Transit oriented development case webinar part 1  (Roland Berger website)
• Transit oriented development case webinar part 2   (Roland Berger website)
• 3D printed hip implants case webinar part 1   (Roland Berger website)
• 3D printed hip implants case webinar part 2   (Roland Berger website)
• Roland Berger case interview guide   (by IGotAnOffer)

12. Capital One case interview examples

• Case interview example video walkthrough  (Capital One website)
• Capital One case interview guide (by IGotAnOffer)

12. EY Parthenon case interview examples

• Candidate-led case example with feedback (by IGotAnOffer)

14. Consulting clubs case interview examples

• Berkeley case book (2006)
• Columbia case book (2006)
• Darden case book (2012)
• Darden case book (2018)
• Duke case book (2010)
• Duke case book (2014)
• ESADE case book (2011)
• Goizueta case book (2006)
• Illinois case book (2015)
• LBS case book (2006)
• MIT case book (2001)
• Notre Dame case book (2017)
• Ross case book (2010)
• Wharton case book (2010)

Practice with experts

Using case interview examples is a key part of your interview preparation, but it isn’t enough.

At some point you’ll want to practise with friends or family who can give some useful feedback. However, if you really want the best possible preparation for your case interview, you'll also want to work with ex-consultants who have experience running interviews at McKinsey, Bain, BCG, etc.

If you know anyone who fits that description, fantastic! But for most of us, it's tough to find the right connections to make this happen. And it might also be difficult to practice multiple hours with that person unless you know them really well.

Here's the good news. We've already made the connections for you. We’ve created a coaching service where you can do mock case interviews 1-on-1 with ex-interviewers from MBB firms . Start scheduling sessions today!

Related articles:

Operation Management Interview: M.’s Case

Operation management is an emerging multidisciplinary field that is frequently misinterpreted due to its complex nature. This major is a popular choice among those enrolling in MBA programs, and after graduation, operation managers often become the linchpin of their organizations as so many responsibilities rest on their shoulders. The actual duties of an operation manager vary greatly depending on the business needs of a given company.

In the modern context, such specialists often take up the roles of a human resource, outsource, and resource manager. The moderate relationships between those involved in the work processes, acquire goods and services from external sources and ensure sustainable use of resources. In this paper, I aim at eliminating vagueness and clarifying what operation management is and is not by interviewing M., 35, who works in retail.

Daily Tasks

M. has been working in supply chain management for eight years now and describes her position as a major upgrade from a similar position at a smaller company. When asked what attracts her about the field, M. emphasizes the diversity of tasks, which is mentally challenging and does not let her fall back into the routine. “No one day is like another. One morning my boss can break the news that I am in charge of negotiating with manufacturers who want to sell their goods on our e-commerce platforms. Tomorrow, our HR-manager calls me to her office to help to recruit candidates.

She needs to make sure that they understand the mission and vision of our company, and I’m the ambassador of its core values.” On top of what M. listed, operation managers often have to handle legal procedures and even tap into budgeting and auditing. They are mediators between all company’s departments and do their best to uphold policies and ramp up efficiency and performance.

Operation Management Tools

The woman admits that when she first applied for her current job in retail, operation management was still a new concept that many used as a buzzword. As the company was expanding continuously, the managing board started to take the theoretical framework and practical tools more seriously. “One year in, they asked us to enroll in training. I was skeptical about the opportunity as to me, the entire operation seemed nothing more than a sheer formality,” recollects M. “However, the course turned out to be very hands-on: we worked on a case after a case. Tools and solutions I discovered back then still apply today.”

Quality Control

M. says that probably “the most useful item in [her] toolbox” is quality control and inspection. The woman reasons that businesses have always been result-oriented, but these days, for a positive outcome, a company needs to strike a balance between increased revenue and customer satisfaction. This is especially true for logistics and supply chain management: M. admits that customers’ expectations are different from what they used to be even ten years ago.

Quality control and inspection allow the company for which she is working to not only trigger short spikes of interest but also build a long-term relationship with clients. “We used to do surveys, but with time, we realized that people rarely have time for filling in all these forms. Now we’re trying to look at hard data: customer loyalty, complaints, and even our website’s bounce rate. If someone leaves a page three seconds after they opened it, something must have rubbed them the wrong way.”

Product Scheduling

M. cannot stress enough the importance of production scheduling and deems it one of the critical operation management tools in her practice. Scheduling aims at controlling and optimizing work processes so that a product or a service comes out on time. In a broader sense, this strategy means making sure that a company meets designated deadlines. “I know it sounds trite but time is money,” says M. “My team manages an e-commerce platform, and we need to make an effort and introduce new functions before or at least at the same time with our direct contenders.

Our latest scheduled service was one-click buying after the research that revealed clients’ dissatisfaction with long forms. As for other deadlines, it is critical to set revenue goals, which entails profit maximization and expected sales calculation techniques.”

Equipment Maintenance Policies

“Sometimes I wonder how I manage to keep so many things in mind at the same time,” wonders M. After a moment, she adds laughing, “I guess being a mother of two taught me multitasking. It’s not prerequisite for what I’m doing in the workplace, but it sure helps.” Equipment maintenance is an operation management strategy and a skill to acquire which, a person needs to be able to predict outcomes and be familiar with the technical side of their company’s activities. For this, he or she needs to collaborate closely with technicians and know-how and when to assess, adjust, and replace equipment, outsourcing tasks when necessary.

“We depend heavily on hardware and software. Moreover, we have at least 150 employees in our staff, and even the most motivated of them won’t work as hard if, say, air conditioning fails unexpectedly, or a cooler runs out of water.

Can you imagine what one day without electricity or one server shutdown can do to our sales?” asks M. “Equipment maintenance is often the hardest thing to learn. As a manager, I’m good at handling urgent problems: check this paper, call that person. Equipment can function just right for years and then break down in one day. Continuous assessment and complying with maintenance guidelines are so often dismissed, and yet, not caring enough costs money. If I were to describe the perfect operation management mindset, it would be “I care.”

Operation management encompasses planning, organizing, and supervising production or service provision. The present paper provided the highlights of an interview with M., a 35-year-old woman who works for an e-commerce shipping company. M. admits that operation management has become an indispensable part of logistics and supply chain management. If earlier, the concept was rather something businesses like to toy with, nowadays, the theoretical framework offers enough tools to implement and enhance efficiency and performance. M. reports that she genuinely enjoys her role as a mediator between the company’s department.

The need to alternate between vastly different tasks gives her a sense of accomplishment. In the interview, she mentioned three operation management tools that she uses in her daily practice: quality control and inspection, product scheduling, and equipment maintenance. Among her top priorities are punctuality, customer care, and planning. M. concludes that operation management requires personal involvement and dedication: it is nigh on impossible to multitask and keep one’s mind busy unless it is for a great cause.

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyKraken. (2021, September 19). Operation Management Interview: M.’s Case. https://studykraken.com/operation-management-interview-m-s-case/

"Operation Management Interview: M.’s Case." StudyKraken , 19 Sept. 2021, studykraken.com/operation-management-interview-m-s-case/.

1. StudyKraken . "Operation Management Interview: M.’s Case." September 19, 2021. https://studykraken.com/operation-management-interview-m-s-case/.

Bibliography

StudyKraken . "Operation Management Interview: M.’s Case." September 19, 2021. https://studykraken.com/operation-management-interview-m-s-case/.

StudyKraken . 2021. "Operation Management Interview: M.’s Case." September 19, 2021. https://studykraken.com/operation-management-interview-m-s-case/.

StudyKraken . (2021) 'Operation Management Interview: M.’s Case'. 19 September.

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyKraken, request the removal .

• Personalized Websites Websites and branding designed for your ideal client.
• AI-Powered Email Builder
• Text Message Marketing Serve your clients better and much, much faster with Convos.
• Freedom360 Instead of trying to manage your entire marketing system yourself, we’ll do it for you.
• Success Stories
• FMOs & IMOs
• RIAs & RIA Aggregators
• Broker Dealers
• State of Digital
• Webinar Replays
• eBooks & Guides
• Case Studies
• Cold to Gold Masterclass
• Request a Demo
• Personalized Websites
• Marketing Automation
• Text Message Marketing

Watch a Demo

Fill out the short form below to see an instant demo of the platform.

Check Territory Availability

Dominate your exclusive territory with "auto-pilot" marketing.

*Territories are exclusive for our advertising program (we don’t advertise more than one adviser per territory). However, you are not required to claim a territory to join Snappy Kraken.

RESOURCES LIBRARY

Case studies .

Jeff Burrow of Sierra Ocean, LLC

How Jeff Burrows is booking more appointments with Freedom360 View More -->

John Suarez of Periscope Wealth

How John Suarez of Periscope Wealth won a HNW client worth $150k/year using one automated email campaign

Juan Munoz of Life Strategy Financial

How Juan Munoz of Life Strategy Financial used original content to land a $6MM client...

Hannah Buschbom of Ameriflex Financial

How Snappy Kraken helped save 10-15 hours of marketing every month View More -->

Michael Baker of Vertex Capital Advisors

How Snappy Kraken helped automate marketing & grow their practice View More -->

1452 North U.S. Hwy 1, Suite 121 • Ormond Beach, FL 32174

Sales phone.

888-946-3188

888.946.3188 [email protected]

844-762-7795

844.762.7795 [email protected]

844.762.7795 [email protected]

© Snappy Kraken 2024 | All Rights Reserved

• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions

At home, abroad, working, interning?  Wherever you are this summer, contact OCS or make an appointment for a virtual advising session. We are available all summer! 

• Undergraduates
• Ph.Ds & Postdocs
• Prospective Students & Guests
• What is a Community?
• Student Athletes
• First Generation and/or Low Income Students
• International Students
• LGBTQ Students
• Students of Color
• Students with Disabilities
• Student Veterans
• Exploring Careers
• Advertising, Marketing & PR
• Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
• General Management & Leadership Development Programs
• Law & Legal Services
• Startups, Entrepreneurship & Freelance Work
• Environment, Sustainability & Energy
• Media & Communications
• Policy & Think Tanks
• Engineering
• Healthcare, Biotech & Global Public Health
• Life & Physical Sciences
• Programming & Data Science
• Graduate School
• Health Professions
• Business School
• Meet with OCS
• Student Organizations Workshop Request
• OCS Podcast Series
• Office of Fellowships
• Navigating AI in the Job Search Process
• Cover Letters & Correspondence
• Job Market Insights
• Professional Conduct & Etiquette
• Professional Online Identity
• Interview Preparation
• Resource Database
• Yale Career Link
• Jobs, Internships & Other Experiences
• Gap Year & Short-Term Opportunities
• Planning an International Internship
• Funding Your Experience
• Career Fairs/Networking Events
• On-Campus Recruiting
• Job Offers & Salary Negotiation
• Informational Interviewing
• Peer Networking Lists
• Building Your LinkedIn Profile
• YC First Destinations
• YC Four-Year Out
• GSAS Program Statistics
• Statistics & Reports
• Contact OCS
• OCS Mission & Policies
• Additional Yale Career Offices

Case Interview Study Samples

• Share This: Share Case Interview Study Samples on Facebook Share Case Interview Study Samples on LinkedIn Share Case Interview Study Samples on X

These case studies represent cases across firm styles (McKinsey, Bain, BCG, Deloitte, & more), including interviewer-led and interviewee-led (candidate-led) cases. The video examples demonstrate the nuances of the virtual case interview and include feedback from an MBB coach. The sessions feature consultants or consulting candidates.

Office of Career Strategy

Visiting yale.

• Open access
• Published: 29 May 2024

Cannabis use in a Canadian long-term care facility: a case study

• Lynda G. Balneaves 1 , 4 ,
• Abeer A. Alraja 1 ,
• Genevieve Thompson 1 ,
• Jamie L. Penner 1 ,
• Philip St. John 2 ,
• Daniella Scerbo 1 &
• Joanne van Dyck 3  

BMC Geriatrics volume  24 , Article number:  467 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

300 Accesses

2 Altmetric

Metrics details

Following the legalization of cannabis in Canada in 2018, people aged 65 + years reported a significant increase in cannabis consumption. Despite limited research with older adults regarding the therapeutic benefits of cannabis, there is increasing interest and use among this population, particularly for those who have chronic illnesses or are at end of life. Long-term Care (LTC) facilities are required to reflect on their care and policies related to the use of cannabis, and how to address residents’ cannabis use within what they consider to be their home.

Using an exploratory case study design, this study aimed to understand how one LTC facility in western Canada addressed the major policy shift related to medical and non-medical cannabis. The case study, conducted November 2021 to August 2022, included an environmental scan of existing policies and procedures related to cannabis use at the LTC facility, a quantitative survey of Healthcare Providers’ (HCP) knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to cannabis, and qualitative interviews with HCPs and administrators. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data.

A total of 71 HCPs completed the survey and 12 HCPs, including those who functioned as administrators, participated in the interview. The largest knowledge gaps were related to dosing and creating effective treatment plans for residents using cannabis. About half of HCPs reported providing care in the past month to a resident who was taking medical cannabis (54.9%) and a quarter (25.4%) to a resident that was taking non-medical cannabis. The majority of respondents (81.7%) reported that lack of knowledge, education or information about medical cannabis were barriers to medical cannabis use in LTC. From the qualitative data, we identified four key findings regarding HCPs’ attitudes, cannabis access and use, barriers to cannabis use, and non-medical cannabis use.

Conclusions

With the legalization of medical and non-medical cannabis in jurisdictions around the world, LTC facilities will be obligated to develop policies, procedures and healthcare services that are able to accommodate residents’ use of cannabis in a respectful and evidence-informed manner.

Peer Review reports

In October 2018, Canada became the second country to legalize non-medical cannabis [ 1 ]. Despite the increasing interest in cannabis among Canadians of all ages [ 2 ], the percentage of individuals over the age of 15 years reporting cannabis use a year following legalization remained relatively unchanged at 18% [3]. The only age group to report a significant increase in cannabis consumption was those aged 65 + years, with 7.6% reporting cannabis use in the past 3 months [ 3 ] in 2019 compared to 4% in 2018. This upward trend in cannabis use among Canadians 65 years or older was also observed in 2021 [ 4 ].

This increase may reflect a growing acceptance of cannabis among older populations who were previously dissuaded from taking cannabis due to its illegal status as well as limited accessibility through legal means. In addition, the rise in cannabis use among older adults may reflect a harm reduction approach, substituting cannabis for other recreational substances with substantial health risks, such as alcohol [ 5 ]. Moreover, the belief in the potential therapeutic benefits of cannabis [ 6 , 7 , 8 ], such as the management of pain and sleep issues, is becoming increasingly prevalent among older adults. There has been limited research, however, among older adults in Canada to understand this progressive trend in cannabis use and the influencing factors [ 9 ].

Canada has been a world leader in cannabis legalization, launching a federal medical cannabis program in 2001. Since this time, the medical cannabis program has undergone numerous revisions, including how authorization is obtained, what types of products are available, and where cannabis is purchased. Currently, Canadians can seek medical authorization from either a physician or a nurse practitioner, and access a variety of cannabis products, including dried flower, capsules, and oils, which are purchased online through a licensed producer (LP). Some individuals also apply for a personal or designated grow license to produce their own supply of dried cannabis. Outside of the medical authorization program, individuals can access non-medical cannabis through an authorized storefront. It is estimated that over 1 million Canadians are using cannabis for therapeutic purposes [4], with 247,548 individuals officially registered as of March 2022 [ 10 ]. Among the 479,400 individuals over the age of 65 who reported cannabis use in the third quarter of 2019, 52% utilized cannabis exclusively for medical reasons, and another 24% reported using cannabis for both recreational and medical purposes [ 3 ].

Despite the growing interest in cannabis as a therapeutic agent, there has been limited human research due to its illegal status in many countries, as well as the challenges posed by the complexity of the cannabis plant compared to single agent, pharmaceutical forms of cannabis (e.g., nabilone) [ 11 , 12 ]. Notwithstanding these challenges, there is emergent research on the potential role of cannabis-based medicines in the management of health conditions common among older adults, including osteoarthritis [ 13 ], sleep disorders [ 14 ], dementia [ 15 ], and Parkinson’s [ 16 , 17 ], which are also prevalent among individuals residing at long-term care (LTC) facilities. For example, several studies have found cannabis-based medicines to significantly reduce neuropsychiatric symptoms and improve quality of life among people living with Alzheimer’s Disease [ 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Cannabis may also play a significant role at end of life in not only alleviating physical symptoms, such as pain, nausea and vomiting, and appetite loss, but also addressing the emotional and existential issues that may arise [ 21 ]. It has also been proposed that cannabis may have a therapeutic role among rehabilitative populations who often reside in LTC settings, including those with spinal cord injuries [ 22 , 23 ] and traumatic brain injury [ 24 ]. The evidence base surrounding cannabis as a therapeutic agent, however, remains limited with few large randomized clinical trials conducted to date.

Cannabis is not a benign substance and may pose risk to older adults, especially those living with frailty or cognitive impairment. Given the known cognitive effects of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a cannabinoid found in many forms of cannabis, adults living in long-term and rehabilitative care settings may experience somnolence, confusion, and fatigue [ 25 ]. Cannabis high in THC may also negatively impact motor coordination and increase the risk of falls, especially among those with impaired balance and walking ability [ 25 ]. As research advances on cannabis, there has been growing awareness of its negative interactions with certain medications [ 26 ], which can pose a significant issue among older clients prone to polypharmacy. Lastly, numerous health conditions are contraindicated with cannabis use, including heart disease, and a personal or family history of psychosis, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder [ 27 ].

Despite limited research with older adults regarding the therapeutic benefits of cannabis, there is increasing interest and use among this population, particularly for those who have chronic illnesses. As adults age, they are more likely to experience multimorbidity, and a significant number of older adults spend their last years of life residing in a LTC facility [ 28 , 29 ]. LTC facilities are, thus, placed in a unique position. While these facilities are considered medical institutions that provide evidence-informed supportive health care, they have also become home for individuals who are no longer able to reside safely in the community. Increasingly, these types of facilities are challenged to create home-like environments and offer residents the opportunity and autonomy to engage in potentially risky health behaviours [ 30 ]; behaviours that individuals in the community have the independence and legal right to choose, such as alcohol or tobacco consumption. With the legalization of non-medical cannabis and the growing interest in the potential of cannabis to manage challenging health conditions, it behooves LTC facilities to reflect on their care and policies related to the use of legal substances, such as cannabis, and how to address residents’ cannabis use within what they consider to be their home.

The overarching aim of this case study was to understand how one LTC facility, and its healthcare professionals (HCPs) and administrators, addressed the major policy shift in Canada related to medical and non-medical cannabis. Specific research questions included: (1) What are the experiences and perceptions of HCPs and administrators regarding the use of medical and non-medical cannabis at LTC settings?; (2) What are the perceived barriers/facilitators to medical and non-medical cannabis use at LTC facilities from the perspective of HCPs and administrators?; and (3) What are the educational needs, attitudes, and practices of HCPs at LTC facilities related to medical and non-medical cannabis?

Research design and setting

An exploratory case study design was utilized in this study. This type of case study is used to explore those situations in which the phenomenon being evaluated has no clear or single set of outcomes [ 31 ]. The case selected for this study was a large LTC facility in Western Canada. This 387-bed residential facility provides 24/7 care to a diverse population, including older adults with cognitive and physical disabilities, individuals recovering from stroke and traumatic brain injury, and those requiring end-of-life care. Individuals with these various conditions may reside in several units, including palliative care, rehabilitation, personal care home, and complex chronic care. The case study included an environmental scan of existing policies and procedures related to medical and non-medical cannabis use at the LTC facility, a quantitative survey of HCPs’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to medical and non-medical cannabis, and qualitative interviews with HCPs and administrators. The qualitative interviews were informed by qualitative descriptive methodology [ 32 ] and explored HCPs’ and administrators’ experiences, beliefs, perceptions regarding cannabis use in LTC, and the related barriers and facilitators.

Sample and recruitment

For the survey, a convenience sample was drawn from the entire population of accredited HCPs working in the selected facility. Eligibility criteria included being 18 + years, able to read/speak English, currently employed and providing care at the LTC facility, and able to provide informed written consent. Study participants were recruited through an emailed letter of invitation, posters placed in staff areas, and in-person presentations by a research assistant. From participants who took part in the survey, a subsample of HCPs, including administrators, who expressed interest in taking part in an interview was selected. The data collection period was from November 2021 and August 2022.

Data collection

For the environmental scan, facility administrators were approached via an emailed letter and asked to identify relevant policies and procedures related to cannabis use within their LTC facility. Policies relevant to both residents’ use of cannabis and HCPs’ practice related to medical and non-medical cannabis were requested. Provincial and federal cannabis policies were also collected.

The survey was modified from a questionnaire utilized in two national studies that examined Canadian physicians’ and nurse practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of the associated barriers and facilitators related to medical cannabis use, as well as their preferences regarding medical cannabis education [ 33 , 34 ]. This survey has been found to be internally consistent, with Cronbach’s alphas of 0.70 to 0.92 reported across subscales [ 33 , 34 ]. Slight word changes were made to reflect the fact that individuals living in LTC facility are referred to as residents, not patients, and the name of the facility was used to orientate the questions towards HCPs’ attitudes and practices related to cannabis use within the LTC setting.

Survey items were added that assessed HCPs’ practices related to addressing residents’ and family members’ questions about cannabis, as well as requests for medical cannabis authorization and follow-up care. A demographic survey that assessed gender, age, professional designation, years in practice, area(s) of practice, and education related to medical cannabis was included. The survey was available in hard copy (Supplementary Material 1 ) as well as online through the software program, Qualtrics®.

An interview guide was developed by the research team, which included a facility administrator and HCP, and was informed by the literature and previous cannabis research conducted by members of the research team [ 35 ] (Supplementary Material 2 ). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all but one interview was conducted by the project coordinator (AAA) via Zoom, with one interview occurring over the phone. The interviews were 20–30 min in length and were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Both the survey and interview were completed at times preferred by the respondents, including within and outside work time. No honoraria were provided for study participants.

Data analysis

The policies identified through the environmental scan were reviewed and summarized in table format, with similarities, contradictions and gaps identified.

Quantitative survey data was uploaded into the statistical program, SPSS® v.25. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic information, knowledge about medical cannabis and related attitudes, perceived barriers and facilitators, practice experiences, and preferred educational approaches.

Perceived knowledge gap was calculated by computing the difference between perceived current and desired knowledge levels (i.e., “the level of knowledge you desire” about medical cannabis). Rather than using averages, the knowledge gap was calculated based on how much greater an individual’s desired knowledge level was compared to their current knowledge level [ 36 ]. Only response pairs (i.e., current and desired knowledge) were used, and responses where the desired level was lower than the current level were excluded. To further elucidate, the knowledge gap was calculated by having each respondent’s current knowledge level response subtracted from their desired knowledge level response.

Prior to the onset of qualitative data analysis, the accuracy of the transcripts was checked by listening to the digital recordings. Content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data [ 37 ], with two team members (AAA and LGB) independently reading the transcripts and developing a preliminary coding scheme. Constant comparison of new and existing data ensured consistency, relevance, and comprehensiveness of emerging codes. Several strategies were applied to ensure rigour in the qualitative analysis. To increase credibility, a team member with expertise in qualitative inquiry (LGB) monitored the qualitative data and its analysis. Confirmability was addressed by using the participants’ own words throughout the process of data analysis, interpretation, and description. An audit trail was kept documenting the activities of the study, including data analysis decisions.

Environmental scan of cannabis-related policies

Administrators at the LTC facility provided the research team with the policies and procedures that addressed the management and use of medical and non-medical cannabis within the facility. The guiding policy adopted by the LTC facility was a generic policy applicable to all sites and facilities governed by a regional health authority. This policy, entitled “Patient Use of Medical Cannabis (Marijuana)” was issued in June 2020. The policy, which aimed to provide individuals with “reasonable access to medical cannabis”, outlined numerous issues that might arise with institutional cannabis use, including “ordering, labeling, packaging, storage, security, administration, documentation and monitoring requirements for the use of medical cannabis”. Key aspects of the policy are summarised in a table found in the Supplementary Material section (Supplementary Material 3 ).

Other relevant policies that were reviewed included the standards of practice issued by the provincial college of nurses and the college of physicians and surgeons [ 38 , 39 , 40 ], which provided direction to HCPs working in LTC about their scope of practice regarding medical and non-medical cannabis. The regional health authority’s smoke-free policy [ 41 ] also informed how inhaled forms of medical and non-medical cannabis were addressed, requiring residents to leave the facility grounds to smoke or vape cannabis. Lastly, the overarching federal Cannabis Act and Regulations provided guidance to both administrators and HCPs regarding the Canadian regulations specific to medical and non-medical cannabis [ 1 , 42 ]. Together, existing facility, regional, and national policies created a context in which cannabis was framed as neither a medicine nor a controlled substance, but something unique and complex that must be navigated by residents, family members and staff in LTC settings.

Quantitative survey

Demographic characteristics.

From the approximately 318 eligible HCPs employed at the LTC facility, a total of 71 participants consented and completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 22.3%. With regards to response rate by profession, pharmacists (50.0%) and social workers (42.9%) were best represented, followed by physicians (23.1%), nurses (21.0%), and PT/OT (11.4%).

Most respondents were women (71.8%), registered nurses (62.0%) and worked within the palliative care unit (76.1%) at the facility. The average age of the sample was 40.9 years and the largest proportion of the sample had worked in the LTC facility for 5 or less years. See Table  1 for additional details.

Knowledge about medical cannabis

HCPs reported being most knowledgeable about the therapeutic potential of cannabis (3.1/5.0), potential risks of medical cannabis (2.9/5.0), and the different ways to administer medical cannabis (2.9/5.0). They reported being least knowledgeable about the dosing of medical cannabis (2.0/5.0), how to create effective treatment plans related to medical cannabis (2.1/5.0), and the similarities and differences between different forms of cannabis products and prescription cannabinoid medications (2.2/5.0). The top three ranked knowledge gaps mirrored the items ranked lowest with regards to knowledge (see Table  2 ). Overall, there was high interest in gaining more medical cannabis knowledge, with all knowledge items scoring greater than 4 on desired knowledge level.

Practice experiences with medical cannabis

About half of HCPs reported providing care in the past month to a resident who was taking medical cannabis (54.9%) and a quarter (25.4%) to a resident that was taking non-medical cannabis. Over 60% had been approached by a resident and/or a family member to discuss the potential use of medical cannabis; however, few HCPs reported initiating these conversations. Moreover, when asked if they felt comfortable discussing medical cannabis, 32.4% of HCPs disagreed (data not shown). Less than 20% reported helping residents, either directly or indirectly, to use medical cannabis and a very small proportion (1.3–2.8%) reported assisting residents’ consumption of non-medical cannabis. With regards to authorizing the use of medical cannabis or prescribing cannabinoid medication, which in Canada can be done by either a physician or nurse practitioner, just over half of physicians reported supporting residents’ access to these types of treatment. See Table  3 for additional details.

Barriers to medical cannabis use in long-term care

Lack of knowledge, education or information about medical cannabis were reported to be barriers to medical cannabis use in LTC by most HCPs (81.7%). Moreover, the uncertain risks and benefits of medical cannabis and the lack of clinical guidelines were also perceived as barriers by 66.2% and 63.4% of HCPs, respectively. The complete list of barriers is presented in Table  4 .

Education about medical cannabis

Most of the HCPs agreed that additional education on medical cannabis would increase their comfort with discussing this treatment option with residents and family members (87.4%; data not shown). With regards to indirectly or directly administering medical cannabis to a resident, most HCPs for which this fell within their scope of practice also reported they would feel more comfortable if they had further education (59.2% and 56.4%, respectively; data not shown).

Over half of HCPs had not received any prior education related to medical cannabis (54.9%). Those that had, received it from conferences or workshops (65.6%), books or journal articles (43.8%) or through a colleague (37.5%). While almost half the sample (49.3%) reported receiving information from peer-reviewed sources, nearly a quarter received information about medical cannabis from a non-peer reviewed source or from a resident or family member. Some participants also received information from a cannabis industry source. Table  5 provides additional details.

The preferred sources of medical cannabis education were online learning programs (i.e., continuing education) (74.6%), monographs (66.2%), and topic-specific one-pagers (64.8%). See Fig.  1 for further details.

Percentage of respondents indicating prefered method of cannabis education*

Qualitative findings

A total of 12 HCPs were interviewed regarding their perceptions and experiences related to medical and non-medical cannabis in the LTC facility. This included 3 HCPs who were administrators, 6 nurses, 1 physician, 1 social worker and 1 pharmacist. Four main themes were identified.

Attitudes regarding medical cannabis: cautious support

There were mixed attitudes regarding the potential role of medical cannabis in general and in LTC populations. While some HCPs felt medical cannabis was a “good idea” for which there was beginning research regarding its health benefits, other HCPs believed additional high-quality evidence was needed prior to medical cannabis becoming a therapeutic option.

I think it’s [medical cannabis] the fair option, it helps some people, but it doesn’t help others. So, I think we need a bit more evidence and a bit more research and having it available sort of allows for that research to occur (Physician; PC07).

There appeared to be greater acceptance for medical cannabis use by individuals at end of life compared to those not considered immediately palliative (i.e., living with dementia, stroke, or traumatic brain injury), the latter of which comprise the majority of the people living in LTC settings. For individuals receiving palliative care, some HCPs perceived medical cannabis to be beneficial in managing pain, nausea, and anxiety, as well as reducing the use of other medications that may be problematic (e.g., opioids) due to their side effects. The potential value of medical cannabis in “adding quality of life and living” at the end of life was also mentioned.

I’m working on the palliative care unit right now. A lot of patients that I’ve seen use it [medical cannabis] for anxiety purposes, or for nausea… some people find beneficial. So, I’ve seen it – people find it helpful for those reasons, and then they have to take less of their other medications. So, if it’s worked well for them and that’s what they prefer to do, then I think it should be an option for people, especially if some people find it beneficial. (Registered nurse; PC03)

Within the context of LTC, several HCPs also spoke of the importance of respecting residents’ autonomy and previous experiences taking medical cannabis. The reality of a LTC facility being a resident’s “home” was particularly influential in HCPs’ support of medical cannabis being included as part of a holistic approach to care.

I guess because people live at [LTC facility’s name], that is their home and if they were at home in the community, they would be able to access it [medical cannabis]. (Registered nurse, PC02)

I think it’s a part of people’s lives. And I think if we’re allowing people to have certain things and keeping it as part of their treatment because if you look at a holistic view, preventing somebody from doing something that they’ve been doing for many years is not going to help them be accepting of other types of therapies. (Pharmacist, PC09)

Some HCPs also perceived medical cannabis as offering an alternative to medical treatments that were not consistently effective in managing challenging health conditions, such as dementia and agitation.

HCPs’ attitudes towards medical cannabis varied across different products and routes of administration. Given the existing smoke-free policy at the facility, HCPs were more supportive of edibles, oils, oral sprays or topical creams and lotions than any form of inhaled medical cannabis (i.e., smoking and vaping). They were concerned not only about lung health, environmental exposure, and maintaining a scent-free facility, but also about how to safely manage vulnerable residents travelling off the facility’s property to smoke or vape.

Medical cannabis access and use: concern, confusion, and limited conversations

According to HCPs interviewed, most residents using medical cannabis obtained their authorization prior to moving to LTC. Individuals who sought authorization after arriving at the facility struggled to have their requests acknowledged or addressed by the health care team. As one nurse shared:

I do remember I had a resident that did ask about it [medical cannabis]. And whenever it was kind of brought up, it didn’t seem to be acknowledged all the time. Or there were people who didn’t like the idea of having a resident on it. (Registered nurse; PC06)

Conversations about medical cannabis were perceived to be severely limited by the culture surrounding medical cannabis at the LTC facility. The lack of open discussion about medical cannabis was seen by some to create conflict and negatively impact the development of trust between residents, family members, and the health care team: “ Without that discussion, it does create conflict within the team and between the physician and family, and perhaps that could impact the trusting relationship” (Administrator; PA03). Further, several HCPs expressed the belief that conversations about non-pharmacological forms of medical cannabis could not be initiated by them due to policy issues; residents who expressed interest but did not have prior authorization were instead directed towards pharmaceutical forms of cannabis.

There have been residents who have asked about using cannabis. And as I said, you can’t initiate it, if they’re going to get it on their own, fair enough. That’s pretty much been the experience I’ve had with residents with just non-pharmaceutical medical cannabis . (Physician, PC07)

The only HCP-initiated conversations about medical cannabis mentioned were those occurring between pharmacists and residents, which focused on the potential side effects, benefits, and “red flags” to watch out for, such as allergic reactions.

HCPs shared that for those residents with authorization, they or a support person were responsible for ordering the medical cannabis product from an LP, which would then send the product to either the resident at the LTC facility or to their support person’s home. The cannabis product was then stored in a locked drawer in the resident’s room if they were self-administering or in a medication room if nursing staff were assisting with administration. According to one pharmacist, the pharmacy department was not permitted, due to existing federal regulations, to either directly order or dispense medical cannabis:

No, we don’t dispense any cannabis. It’s considered resident’s own. So, we don’t acquire it for them. They have to directly be the holders of it and have it provided to them directly. And I think that has more to do with the regulations within Canada, the resident has to have certain type of documentation in order to have medical cannabis. So, it’s directly to them, we’re not able to order it for them or anything like that on their behalf. (Pharmacist; PC09)

With regards to the type of medical cannabis products permitted in the facility, due to non-smoking policies and concerns about safety issues and the “smell”, combustible forms and inhaled routes of administration (i.e., joints, vaporizers, vape pens) were not allowed; instead, ingestible forms were mentioned most frequently by HCPs.

There was some confusion and concerns expressed regarding the storage and disposal of medical cannabis, which may have reflected changes in facility policies over time. Some HCPs expressed concerns about the storage of cannabis in residents’ rooms and the lack of “safeguards” to limit potential diversion and allow an accurate “count” of medical cannabis.

We have to go into our Pyxis machine to retrieve a key to open that drawer. So, by going by that you’re able to know who’s actually accessed the key, but once the key is out you have no idea how many people have used that key and accessed that drawer before it’s gone back. You have no way of knowing how much cannabis has been taken out [of the drawer] or used, because you know there’s no way to measure it. So that’s a huge problem, I find. (Registered nurse; PC01)

This nurse was particularly concerned about the potential risk of being accused of diversion:

I’m not worried about people abusing it, it’s more the worry of being accused. You know, like, if a resident says, ‘why is my cannabis running out already, I thought I had enough for a few more weeks?’ and we’re like, ‘I don’t know’, right? There’s the potential for that sort of thing to happen. (Registered nurse; PC01)

There was also a perception that there was a lack of direction from the facility regarding the appropriate disposal of medical cannabis. Most believed residents or family members were expected to remove any unused product once the resident was no longer at the facility. When such disposal was not possible, the policy was to destroy the cannabis product in a manner similar to narcotics or other controlled substances. However, variations in practice occurred with some HCPs described “throwing it in the trash” or using a medical waste disposal bin with or without a witness.

Barriers to medical cannabis use: safety, stigma and lack of knowledge

Numerous barriers to the use of medical cannabis by LTC residents were identified by HCPs. Foremost, the policies related to how cannabis products were ordered, accessed, stored, and administered were perceived to be complicated and created barriers to residents wanting to take medical cannabis, particularly those without family support. The inability of the LTC facility to order medical cannabis on behalf of a resident was perceived to be especially problematic, as described by one registered nurse:

I know when it became legal, there were a few residents who have inquired about it, but they didn’t have the family resources in place to be able to get it because I believe there’s some hoops that you have to go through to be able to have it medically prescribed in getting it on to the unit. And so, the ones who were interested in it didn’t have those supports in place, so they weren’t able to get it prescribed for them. (Registered nurse; PC05)

The lack of awareness and understanding of the regional policies related to medical cannabis by some of the clinical staff was also seen as being problematic. As one registered nurse shared:

My only concern is that there’s a lot of rules around being able to administer and how it’s [medical cannabis] administered, which can again make things a bit complicated. I would say that’s probably my biggest concern is just it’s hard to remember everything that you have to do when you’re trying to administer it or helping a resident. So, you don’t get involved. (Registered nurse; PC06)

Several HCPs attributed the lack of awareness about cannabis policy to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which overshadowed all other health issues within their facility: “ Everybody’s been so focused on COVID for a year and a half that there hasn’t been really time to really think about or educate on other things. ” (Registered nurse; PC01).

HCPs suggested that more “straight forward” and tailored policies were needed that simplified how medical cannabis was managed. Having facility-specific policies would acknowledge the uniqueness of the LTC population, who may have cognitive impairment, limited social support, and complex healthcare plans. As one nurse shared: “ If it’s a dementia patient, they can’t really administer it on their own. So how do we follow the policy to help the patient take the cannabis? How would we know when they would want to take it PRN?” (Registered nurse; PC03). It was also recommended that the policy that prevented the facility from directly ordering and supplying medical cannabis required revision so that LTC residents were not reliant on family members to gain access. Lastly, several HCPs suggested that medical cannabis policies need to be well advertised and additional training developed for clinical staff to enhance their awareness and comfort level in providing appropriate and supportive care.

There needs to be a training session… staff have to read through them [cannabis policies] and get instructions about them, sort of like a self-learning activity. But that is not part of what we do when orienting. (Registered nurse; PC02)

Another perceived barrier frequently mentioned by HCPs was their lack of knowledge regarding the potential risks and benefits of medical cannabis. There was limited understanding about the effects of medical cannabis, how it may interact with other medications and health conditions, what side effects could arise, as well as basic information about starting dose, titration, and difference between THC and cannabidiol (CBD). Without such information, HCPs were perceived to be very hesitant about recommending or supporting medical cannabis as a treatment alternative for LTC residents:

There’s lots of unknown, that’s the problem. If there were more specifics about the recreational and the medical use of cannabis, then I think health care professionals would be more likely to want to provide it to the residents. But if not, then that’s kind of what’s hindering health care professionals to provide it. (Registered nurse; PC08)

There was also substantial discussion by HCPs regarding the “stigma” that they perceived to exist within the facility regarding medical cannabis. As described by one pharmacist: “ I think the understanding of cannabis, regardless of if it’s medical or anything, it’s still considered in many people’s minds as an illicit drug. It hasn’t shaken that. And I think there’s a lot of stereotypes around the type of people that use cannabis” (Pharmacist; PC09). The stigmatization of medical cannabis was perceived to be particularly pronounced among the medical staff, which led to what was described as a “hands-off approach” with regards to authorizing medical cannabis.

Almost all HCPs and administrators interviewed recommended that education programming and resources for HCPs be developed to address the lingering stigma associated with cannabis and the knowledge gaps that exist about medical cannabis and associated policies. Several participants recommended that education initiatives should first target physicians, who were responsible for authorizing medical cannabis in the facility. Physicians were perceived to need education on when and for whom medical cannabis would be appropriate, the latest evidence regarding efficacy and safety (i.e., drug interactions), and what their obligations and responsibilities were as the authorizing HCP. Participants also thought that all HCPs could benefit from additional training regarding medical cannabis, including the different types of cannabinoids and products, the process of titration, and dosing. Some of the nurses interviewed also expressed the need for education about the legal implications of medical cannabis and their role regarding provision and administration:

I think the legal implications of cannabis use, I think that would be a good focus for the nursing group – so that they understood what their obligations were, what they could be held accountable for, those kinds of things. (Administrator; PA02)

Finally, numerous HCPs spoke of the need for “safeguards” and clear policies and procedures to ensure that clinical staff were aware of what type of medical cannabis products residents were taking, what was the “right dose”, and the possibility of cannabis interacting with other medications. As shared by one pharmacist:

So that we know that this patient is on it because there are potential drug interactions with other things that patients are taking. So, we just have to be cautious and aware that patients are doing this. Because especially right now with studies, there haven’t been a lot of great studies on drug interactions. (Pharmacist; PC09)

Non-medical cannabis use: balancing autonomy and safety

HCPs were asked about their attitudes and experiences about residents’ use of non-medical cannabis in the facility. Two disparate points of view became apparent – those that perceived non-medical cannabis as a legal substance that should be available to LTC residents given the facility was their home and those that saw non-medical cannabis as a stigmatized substance that could lead to problematic use and disruptions in the care environment.

Because it is somebody’s home and so you’re trying to honour and match what their lifestyle and aspects of their life at home were and matching that here [LTC facility]. The bad is, while it is somebody’s home, it’s the next person’s home too, and so it’s trying to balance that, right? In an institutional setting, trying to make it as home-like as possible but, at the same time, you know, monitoring and matching for what everyone’s needs are. (Registered nurse; PA01)

Professionally, I think that it creates issues in terms of trying to police the use of recreational cannabis. In terms of smoking cigarette tobacco, that’s an issue in itself. We’re a non-smoking facility. So, adding cannabis to the mix creates issues…having staff perhaps exposed or other people exposed if people are using cannabis indoors or where they’re not supposed. Or if they want to access and use cannabis outside, who’s going to take them for that? Because that creates exposure too for staff or others who may have to escort them. (Registered nurse; PA03)

HCPs frequently mentioned the complexity of managing residents’ non-medical use of cannabis given the facility’s non-smoking policy that required residents to leave the facility grounds to use inhaled forms of cannabis. With staff unable to transport residents outside, concerns were raised regarding the safety of residents, particularly in the winter months, and who would be responsible for their transfer in and out of the facility as well as monitoring how much cannabis was consumed. In addition, residents’ access to non-medical cannabis was again dependent on having a support person that was able and willing to transport the product to the facility, posing a potential equity issue for some residents:

If someone’s wanting to go smoke outside, then mobility might be an issue. If they don’t have the right wheelchair or family to take them outside for that. If they have the access. Like, if they need family to go and buy it and bring it to them, that could be more of an access issue depending on their family support. (Registered nurse; PC03)

There was specific concern expressed for individuals in the rehabilitation units who may have pre-existing substance use issues. For these individuals, HCPs were concerned that allowing access to non-medical cannabis could add to an already complex care plan. In addition, with many vulnerable residents living at the facility, concerns were raised regarding them being “incredibly suggestible” to others encouraging their consumption of cannabis:

These people – they have an addiction. For sure they’re making choices, but those choices are influenced by physical withdrawal or influenced by stress; they’re influenced by lots of things. So, I would hate to put residents in a position where that was one other [non-medical cannabis] thing they had to contend with during the rehab stay. (Administrator, PA02)

The use of cannabis for therapeutic and recreational purposes is becoming more prevalent within older adult populations, both in the community as well as within healthcare institutions. There has also been growing interest in the possible role of medical cannabis for select chronic, rehabilitative, and palliative health conditions, frequently found among individuals residing within LTC settings. LTC facilities, thus, face the complex practice and policy implications associated with a substance that has been surrounded in controversy for close to a century. This case study is among the first to explore in one LTC facility in Western Canada how cannabis use is being addressed following the legalization of non-medical cannabis products, and what challenges exist. It provides an important snapshot of the complexities surrounding cannabis use in LTC and a foundation for future research.

Cannabis use in LTC settings: a clash of cultures

One challenge experienced by people residing in LTC facilities is the tension that exists between social and medical models of care that most facilities are founded on. Historically, LTC facilities have operated as what Goffman [ 43 ] termed “total institutions”, places where every aspect of a person’s life was controlled by others, paternalism dominated, and the medical needs of people were what drove care practices. Aspects of the total institution still exist, as noted in this case study, whereby cannabis use is in the control of the HCPs; it is dispensed during medication administration times rather than being freely available for use by the resident when they so desire as would be in a person’s home. In trying to create more home-like environments and meet the broad range of social and emotional needs of residents, resident-centred care practices and relational models of care have emerged [ 44 ]. Within this milieu, resident autonomy and choice are at the forefront and HCPs are there to assist, rather than take control of residents’ daily lives. In the most ideal settings, behaviours that are considered ‘risky’, like alcohol consumption, are treated as social experiences, not care tasks to be managed [ 45 ]. The tension arises, however, that despite the desire to be resident-centred, most LTC facilities are highly regulated by governments, putting limits to resident choice and, therefore, their autonomy [ 45 ]. While HCPs in our study acknowledged that residents should have the right to use medical or non-medical cannabis, the regional and institutional policies surrounding safety and the rights of other residents and staff to not be exposed to potentially risky behaviour underscored many of their views. LTC facilities would be wise to consider the principles of dignity of risk [ 46 ] with relation to cannabis consumption/use along the frail elderly population that reside in the home.

Cannabis policies and LTC: one size doesn’t fit all

The cannabis policies developed at the advent of legalization, without consideration of the unique populations and healthcare challenges that exist within LTC facilities, created numerous barriers to residents accessing and using cannabis, as well as for HCPs attempting to provide appropriate care. One of the most significant challenges experienced by LTC residents in our study was the inability to obtain a medical cannabis authorization from a physician working in the facility. Another significant challenge was the regional policy that medical cannabis could not be couriered directly to the LTC pharmacy; instead, the resident or their support persons were responsible for ordering and bringing cannabis products into the facility. Both challenges created enormous inequity in which residents that lacked the physical and cognitive ability to obtain authorization and order medical cannabis from an LP or were without a support person willing and able to obtain medical cannabis on their behalf, were unable to access medical cannabis. Given the nature of LTC populations, these policies led to only a few residents being able to access and use medical cannabis as part of their care.

Another policy that had substantial safety implications for residents wanting to use inhaled forms of cannabis was the regional and institutional no smoking policies that prevented both tobacco and cannabis products from being consumed within the centre as well as on the grounds. As a result, residents had to make their own way, or be accompanied by a support person, to walk approximately 300 m to the public sidewalk where they were allowed to smoke or vape cannabis. With the LTC facility located in a region where winter temperatures can reach − 35 Celsius and sidewalks are covered in snow and ice, this poses significant risk for residents who may be at heightened risk of falls and utilizing assisted walking devices. Similar safety implications of smoke-free policies have been identified in previous research [ 47 ].

Lastly, the policies surrounding the storage and self-administration of medical cannabis for those residents with the physical and emotional capacity (or with a support person willing to administer) may pose potential safety and liability risks and contribute to the concerns held by some HCPs about the use of cannabis in LTC. While residents’ autonomy must be respected, as well as their own expertise with regards to medical cannabis use, the value of standardized medication protocols to ensure the safety of residents as well as to inform care decisions must be acknowledged. The tension experienced in balancing LTC residents’ autonomy with health and safety concerns in the context of substance use has been cited in a recent scoping review [ 48 ] as well as prior research that has examined the use of tobacco in residential care settings [ 49 ].

The policy-related challenges identified by study participants suggest that consultations with LTC residents, families and HCPs are urgently needed to develop and refine cannabis policies that address the needs and reality of individuals living and receiving care in LTC. Future policy reviews must balance LTC residents’ autonomy with the safety issues associated with cannabis use (i.e., dignity of risk), particularly among older adults and those with cognitive and physical impairments. Approaching cannabis policies and procedures in LTC from a harm reduction perspective [ 50 ] with regards to supporting safer consumption of medical cannabis (e.g., route of administration, designated consumption areas) may also be important. Further, the unique context of LTC must also be acknowledged in that for many residents, a LTC facility is their home, and will continue to be so until the end of their lives. But the shared nature of a LTC setting requires that some boundaries be established to protect all residents, as well as those working within LTC. From a staff perspective, a review of policies related to the administration and documentation of cannabis use is needed to protect them from claims of diversion as well as other medicolegal challenges.

Cannabis knowledge gap and stigma in LTC

Across both the quantitative and qualitative data, the gap in knowledge regarding cannabis and the need for continuing education for HCPs working in LTC were readily apparent. When HCPs are unfamiliar about the various forms of medical cannabis, appropriate dosing and titration schedules, and routes of administration, they are hindered in their ability to engage in shared decision making with LTC residents as well as provide high-quality care [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. Education is particularly needed that is tailored to the unique risks and benefits of medical cannabis use among LTC populations, including those living with physical and cognitive impairment. Older adults may be more sensitive to the side effects of cannabis due to changes in how medications and drugs are metabolised, and the predominance of polypharmacy among those residing in LTC may further complicate how individuals respond to cannabis [ 55 ]. Therefore, HCPs working in LTC must be aware of how cannabis use may impact individuals’ mobility, memory, and behaviour, as well as the potential for dependency, particularly among those who have experienced substance use issues in the past.

Beyond basic education regarding cannabis and its effects, HCPs must also become aware and informed about existing federal, regional, and institutional policies as well as professional practice standards regarding both medical and non-medical cannabis. The study findings highlighted the uncertainty many HCPs experienced regarding how medical and non-medical cannabis was to be accessed, authorized, administered, stored, and disposed within the LTC facility and what was within their professional scope of practice. Legal concerns about liability, workplace safety, and diversion were also raised.

It is important that future cannabis education programs targeting LTC settings also address the underlying stigma and stereotypes that still surround cannabis use [ 56 , 57 ], despite the existence of a medical cannabis program in Canada for over 20 years and the recent legalization of non-medical cannabis. Experiential training that promotes non-judgmental communication that avoids stigmatizing language (e.g., user, addict, marijuana) and considers both the risks and benefits of cannabis use, particularly within the context of end-of-life care, will help address the stigma that HCPs and LTC residents and families may hold towards cannabis.

With the legalization of cannabis in many regions around the world, it is imperative that undergraduate health professional training programs include information about both medical and non-medical cannabis. Currently, there is a knowledge gap among HCPs due to the lack of standardized curriculum for medical cannabis across nursing or medical schools [ 35 , 58 ]. Understanding such foundational knowledge such as the endocannabinoid system, the different forms and types of cannabis, and the potential health effects will enable physicians, nurses, pharmacists and other HCPs to engage in informed conversations with individuals and families both within and beyond LTC [ 33 ]. In addition, the development of continuing education programs focused on cannabis will ensure practicing HCPs have current knowledge about cannabis, including existing policies and programs relevant to medical and non-medical cannabis. For example, the Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health created asynchronous e-learning modules to provide evidence-based knowledge for various clinicians [ 59 ].

Non-medical cannabis use in LTC: it’s legal but…

Despite non-medical cannabis being a legal substance for over three years in Canada at the time of the case study, the use of non-medical cannabis by LTC residents was considered controversial amongst the HCPs interviewed. Not only were HCPs limited in their ability to support the use of non-medical cannabis due to regional policies that prohibited non-medical cannabis consumption at any healthcare facility and surrounding grounds but concerns about potential safety risks and disruptions to the care environment made some HCPs hesitant about supporting residents’ use of non-medical cannabis.

Notwithstanding these challenges, at least a quarter of HCPs surveyed reported providing care to a LTC resident who used non-medical cannabis, which suggests that regulatory and policy changes are required to ensure there is equity across LTC residents who may express interest in non-medical cannabis, as well as to address the unique safety and care issues associated with recreational cannabis use in LTC populations. Similar to medical cannabis, LTC residents’ autonomy must be considered in future policy changes related to non-medical cannabis to facilitate care that is free from stigma and bias, respects residents’ rights to make informed decisions and to live with risk, and to create a home-like environment where residents can engage in activities that were an important part of their lives before entering LTC.

Lessons can be drawn from literature that has examined the use of other legal substances, such as alcohol and tobacco in LTC [ 48 , 60 ], and the need to develop person-centered care plans that ensure the safety of the individual, fellow residents, and the healthcare team.

Limitations

Like all case studies, the findings cannot be extrapolated to other LTC settings and populations. Given that this study was undertaken in Canada, which has a socialized healthcare system and legalized both medical and non-medical cannabis, the experiences and attitudes of HCPs who participated may be unique and limit the generalizability of the findings. However, there are lessons to be learned regarding the challenges that residents in LTC facilities face in using medical and non-medical cannabis, as well as the potential need for both education and policy reform to better support HCPs in providing appropriate, safe, and person-centred care of LTC residents. In addition, the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data allowed triangulation during the data analysis and helped improved the rigor of the findings [ 61 ]. Recruitment and data collection for this study also occurred during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the response rate was lower than desired and there was limited diversity among study participants with regards health profession designation. However, the proportion of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other allied health professions reflected the overall staff composition of the LTC facility.

Implications for future research

Beyond the policy and practice implications discussed earlier, the study findings also point to the urgent need for research focused on cannabis use among populations commonly found within LTC settings. The lack of evidence regarding the potential health effects of cannabis in the management of diseases such as dementia, arthritis, Parkinson’s, traumatic brain injury, and multiple sclerosis led many of the HCPs interviewed to be hesitant about authorizing and supervising cannabis use for LTC residents living with these conditions. While there is a growing number of studies being undertaken focused on medical cannabis, many are limited by their sample size and study design. It is only through high-quality clinical trials that evaluate the efficacy and safety of medical cannabis that a change in practice will occur.

Future medical cannabis research must also be developed in a manner that is inclusive of older adults and those living in LTC. The exclusion of such populations from clinical research has been previously identified as problematic [ 62 ], resulting in research findings that lack generalizability and pose challenges in determining the applicability of research to older adults who may be living with numerous co-morbidities and using multiple medications. While the inclusion of older adults in medical cannabis clinical trials may be more methodologically and ethically challenging, it will lead to evidence that will inform both future policies and practices.

Lastly, our case study offers insight into the reality and challenges of cannabis use by residents of one LTC facility. Additional research across different jurisdictions is needed to explore how LTC settings are addressing cannabis use and to learn from their experiences. We encourage the continued use of mixed methods study designs to ensure the experiences and perspectives of residents, family members and HCPs are captured alongside administrative data related to medical and non-medical cannabis use.

With the legalization of medical and non-medical cannabis in jurisdictions around the world, LTC facilities will be obligated to develop policies, procedures and healthcare services that are able to accommodate residents’ use of cannabis in a respectful and evidence-informed manner. Balancing the safety concerns against the potential therapeutic value of cannabis, as well as considering residents’ autonomy and the home-like environment of LTC, will be important considerations in how cannabis use is addressed and regulated. Our case study highlights the lack of knowledge, inequities, and stigma that continue to surround cannabis in LTC. There is an urgent need for research that not only explores the potential risks and benefits of cannabis, but also informs the development of more nuanced and equitable policies and education resources that will support reasonable and informed access to medical and non-medical cannabis for older adults and others living in LTC.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the small sample size drawn from one health care facility but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Cannabidiol

Healthcare provider

Long–term care

Tetrahydrocannabinol

Licensed Producer

Government of Canada. Cannabis Act (S.C. 2018, c.16). 2018. http://canlii.ca/t/5392s retrieved on 2019-10-07.

Sandhu HS, Anderson LN, Busse JW. Characteristics of canadians likely to try or increase cannabis use following legalization for nonmedical purposes: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open. 2019;7(2):E399–404.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Statistics Canada. National Cannabis Survey, third quarter 2019. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/191030/dq191030a-eng.htm

Statistics Canada. Research to Insights: Cannabis in Canada. 2023. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-631-x/11-631-x2023006-eng.htm

Lau N, Sales P, Averill S, Murphy F, Sato SO, Murphy S. A safer alternative: cannabis substitution as harm reduction. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2015;34(6):654–9.

Bobitt J, Qualls SH, Schuchman M, Wickersham R, Lum HD, Arora K, et al. Qualitative analysis of cannabis use among older adults in Colorado. Drugs Aging. 2019;36(7):655–66.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Reynolds IR, Fixen DR, Parnes BL, Lum HD, Shanbhag P, Church S, et al. Characteristics and patterns of marijuana use in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(11):2167–71.

Baumbusch J, Sloan Yip I. Exploring new use of cannabis among older adults. Clin Gerontol. 2021;44(1):25–31.

Tumati S, Lanctôt KL, Wang RD, Li A, Davis A, Herrmann N. Medical cannabis use among older adults in Canada: self-reported data on types and amount used, and perceived effects. Drugs Aging. 2022;39(2):153–63.

Government of Canada. Data on cannabis for medical purposes. 2022. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-medication/cannabis/research-data/medical-purpose.html

Cooper ZD, Abrams DI, Gust S, Salicrup A, Throckmorton DC. Challenges for clinical cannabis and cannabinoid research in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2021;2021(58):114–22.

Piomelli D, Solomon R, Abrams D, Balla A, Grant I, Marcotte T, et al. Regulatory barriers to research on cannabis and cannabinoids: a proposed path forward. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2019;4(1):21–32.

O’Brien M, McDougall JJ. Cannabis and joints: scientific evidence for the alleviation of osteoarthritis pain by cannabinoids. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2018;40:104–9.

Babson KA, Sottile J, Morabito D. Cannabis, cannabinoids, and sleep: a review of the literature. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(4):23.

Hillen JB, Soulsby N, Alderman C, Caughey GE. Safety and effectiveness of cannabinoids for the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: a systematic review. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019;10:2042098619846993.

Chagas MHN, Zuardi AW, Tumas V, Pena-Pereira MA, Sobreira ET, Bergamaschi MM, et al. Effects of cannabidiol in the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease: an exploratory double-blind trial. J Psychopharmacol. 2014;28(11):1088–98.

Shohet A, Khlebtovsky A, Roizen N, Roditi Y, Djaldetti R. Effect of medical cannabis on thermal quantitative measurements of pain in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Pain. 2017;21(3):486–93.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Herrmann N, Ruthirakuhan M, Gallagher D, Verhoeff NPLG, Kiss A, Black SE, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of nabilone for agitation in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;27(11):1161–73.

Shelef A, Barak Y, Berger U, Paleacu D, Tadger S, Plopsky I, et al. Safety and efficacy of medical cannabis oil for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: an open label, add-on, pilot study. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016;51(1):15–9.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Volicer L, Stelly M, Morris J, Mclaughlin J, Volicer BJ. Effects of dronabinol on anorexia and disturbed behavior in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997;12(9):913–9.

Cyr C, Arboleda MF, Aggarwal SK, Balneaves LG, Daeninck P, Néron A, et al. Cannabis in palliative care: current challenges and practical recommendations. Ann Palliat Med. 2018;7(4):463–77.

Pooyania S, Ethans K, Szturm T, Casey A, Perry D. A randomized, double-blinded, crossover pilot study assessing the effect of nabilone on spasticity in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(5):703–7.

Wilsey B, Marcotte TD, Deutsch R, Zhao H, Prasad H, Phan A. An exploratory human laboratory experiment evaluating vaporized cannabis in the treatment of neuropathic pain from spinal cord injury and disease. J Pain. 2016;17(9):982–1000.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Grenier K, Ponnambalam F, Lee D, Lauwers R, Bhalerao S. Cannabis in the treatment of traumatic brain injury: a primer for clinicians. Can J Neurol Sci. 2019;47(1):11–7.

Minerbi A, Hauser W, Fitzcharles MA. Medical cannabis for older patients. Drugs Aging. 2019;36(1):39–51.

MacCallum CA, Russo EB. Practical considerations in medical cannabis administration and dosing. Eur J Int Med. 2018;49:12–9.

Bertram JR, Porath A, Seitz D, Kalant H, Krishnamoorthy A, Nickerson J, et al. Canadian guidelines on cannabis use disorder among older adults. Can Geriatr J. 2020;23(1):135–42.

Banerjee S. Multimorbidity–older adults need health care that can count past one. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):587–9.

Bom J, Bakx P, Rellstab S. Well-being right before and after a permanent nursing home admission. Health Econ. 2022;31(12):2558–74.

Calkins M, Brush J. Honoring individual choice in long-term residential communities when it involves risk: a person-centered approach. J Gerontol Nurs. 2016;42(8):12–7.

Yin R. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2018.

Google Scholar  

Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–40.

Balneaves LG, Alraja A, Ziemianski D, McCuaig F, Ware M. A national needs assessment of Canadian nurse practitioners regarding cannabis for therapeutic purposes. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2018;3(1):66–73.

Ziemianski D, Capler R, Tekanoff R, Lacasse A, Luconi F, Ware MA. Cannabis in medicine: a national educational needs assessment among Canadian physicians. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:50–2.

Article   Google Scholar  

Balneaves LG, Alraja AA. Guarding their practice: a descriptive study of Canadian nursing policies and education related to medical cannabis. BMC Nurs. 2019;18(1):66.

Fox RD. Revisiting discrepancy analysis in continuing medical education: a conceptual model 1983. J Contin Health Prof. 2011;31(1):71–6.

Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.

College of Registered Nurses of Manitoba. Medical cannabis: Guidelines for Manitoba nurses. 2019. https://www.crnm.mb.ca/uploads/document/document_file_247.pdf?t=1549645011

College of Registered Nurses of Manitoba. Practice direction: RN(NP) authorization of medical cannabis. 2018. https://www.crnm.mb.ca/uploads/document/document_file_252.pdf?t=1538755351

The College of Physicians & Surgeons of Manitoba. Standard of practice: Cannabis for medical purpose. 2020. https://cpsm.mb.ca/assets/Standards of Practice/Standard of Practice Authorizing Cannabis for Medical Purposes.pdf.

Winnipeg Regional Health Authority. Smoke-Free Policy. 2014. https://wrha.mb.ca/files/wrha-policy-10-00-010.pdf

Government of Canada. Cannabis regulations (SOR/2018 – 144) [. 2018. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Regulations/SOR-2018-144/index.html

Goffman E. Asylums: essays on the social situations of mental patients and other inmates. Oxford, England: Doubleday (Anchor); 1961.

White-Chu EF, Graves WJ, Godfrey SM, Bonner A, Sloane P. Beyond the medical model: the culture change revolution in long-term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009;10(6):370–8.

Chivers S. Make mine a double. In: Armstrong P, Daly T, editors. Exercising choice in long-term residential care. Montreal, QC: RR Donnelley; 2017. pp. 55–8.

Woolford MH, de Lacy-Vawdon C, Bugeja L, Weller C, Ibrahim JE. Applying dignity of risk principles to improve quality of life for vulnerable persons. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;35(1):122–30.

Schultz ASH, Finegan B, Nykiforuk CIJ, Kvern MA. A qualitative investigation of smoke-free policies on hospital property. CMAJ. 2011;183(18):2085–6.

De Graaf L, Janssen M, Roelofs T, Luijkx K. Substance use and misuse of older adults living in residential care facilities: a scoping review from a person-centred care approach. Ageing Soc. 2021;43(6):1–27.

Adler G, Greeman M, Parker H, Kuskowski M. Self-determination and residents who smoke. J Social Work Long-Term Care. 2002;1(4):19–30.

Lau N, Sales P, Averill S, Murphy F, Sato SO, Murphy S. Responsible and controlled use: older cannabis users and harm reduction. Int J Drug Policy. 2015;26(8):709–18.

Clobes TA, Palmier LA, Gagnon M, Klaiman C, Arellano M. The impact of education on attitudes toward medical cannabis. PEC Innov. 2022;1:100009.

Croker JA, Bobitt J, Sanders S, Arora K, Mueller K, Kaskie B. Cannabis and end-of-life care: a snapshot of hospice planning and experiences among Illinois medical cannabis patients with a terminal diagnosis. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2022;39(3):345–52.

Hachem Y, Abdallah SJ, Rueda S, Wiese JL, Mehra K, Rup J, et al. Healthcare practitioner perceptions on barriers impacting cannabis prescribing practices. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022;22(1):1–12.

Hope J, Schoonhoven L, Griffiths P, Gould L, Bridges J. I’ll put up with things for a long time before I need to call anybody: face work, the Total Institution and the perpetuation of care inequalities. Sociol Health Illn. 2022;44(2):469–87.

Williams AR. Ethical dilemmas in counseling older adults on cannabis use: less science, more quandaries. Generations J. 2020;44(4):1–5.

Skliamis K, Benschop A, Korf DJ. Cannabis users and stigma: a comparison of users from European countries with different cannabis policies. Eur J Crimin. 2022;19(6):1483–500.

Troup LJ, Erridge S, Ciesluk B, Sodergren MH. Perceived stigma of patients undergoing treatment with cannabis-based medicinal products. Int J Env Res Public Health. 2022;19(12).

Evanoff AB, Quan T, Dufault C, Awad M, Bierut LJ. Physicians-in-training are not prepared to prescribe medical marijuana. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;180:151–5.

Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health. Cannabis and older adults. https://ccsmh.ca/cannabis-and-older-adults-project/

Grossi A, Holmes A, Ibrahim JE. Use of alcohol in long term care settings: a comparative analysis of personal choice, public health advice and the law. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22(1):9–e141.

Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:100.

Crome P, Lally F, Cherubini A, Oristrell J, Beswick AD, Clarfield AM, et al. Exclusion of older people from clinical trials: professional views from nine European countries participating in the PREDICT study. Drugs Aging. 2011;28(8):667–77.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the healthcare professionals that graciously took the time to share their thoughts about cannabis use in long-term care settings. In addition, Ms. Sina Barkman, Chief Human Resources Officer, Riverview Health Centre, helped the research team navigate the complexity of conducting research in long-term care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Funding for this study was received from the Riverview Health Centre Foundation.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Lynda G. Balneaves, Abeer A. Alraja, Genevieve Thompson, Jamie L. Penner & Daniella Scerbo

Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Philip St. John

Riverview Health Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Joanne van Dyck

College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada

Lynda G. Balneaves

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

“L.G.B, G.T, J.P and P.StJ. conceptualised the study. A.A.A. and D.S. engaged in recruitment and data collection activities. L.G.B. and A.A.A. analysed and interpreted the quantitative and qualitative data and developed a first draft of the manuscript, with assistance from G.T. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynda G. Balneaves .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the University of Manitoba Research Ethics Board (R1-2021:011 (HS24693)) and was approved by the Riverview Health Centre Research Committee. Implied consent was received from participants who completed the survey and written informed consent was obtained from all participants who completed an interview. We confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant ethical guidelines and regulations, (i.e., Tri-Council Policy Statement).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Balneaves, L.G., Alraja, A.A., Thompson, G. et al. Cannabis use in a Canadian long-term care facility: a case study. BMC Geriatr 24 , 467 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05074-2

Download citation

Received : 11 July 2023

Accepted : 13 May 2024

Published : 29 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05074-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Medical cannabis
• Non-medical cannabis
• Long-term care
• Residential care
• Older adults

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

• Submission enquiries: [email protected]
• General enquiries: [email protected]

• Open access
• Published: 05 June 2024

Current status and ongoing needs for the teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning – an international mixed-methods study from the students` and teachers` perspective

• F. L Wagner 1 ,
• M. Sudacka 2 ,
• A. A Kononowicz 3 ,
• M. Elvén 4 , 5 ,
• S. J Durning 6 ,
• I. Hege 7 &
• S. Huwendiek 1  

BMC Medical Education volume  24 , Article number:  622 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

46 Accesses

Metrics details

Clinical reasoning (CR) is a crucial ability that can prevent errors in patient care. Despite its important role, CR is often not taught explicitly and, even when it is taught, typically not all aspects of this ability are addressed in health professions education. Recent research has shown the need for explicit teaching of CR for both students and teachers. To further develop the teaching and learning of CR we need to improve the understanding of students' and teachers' needs regarding content as well as teaching and assessment methods for a student and trainer CR curriculum.

Parallel mixed-methods design that used web-surveys and semi-structured interviews to gather data from both students (n survey  = 100; n interviews  = 13) and teachers (n survey  = 112; n interviews  = 28). The interviews and surveys contained similar questions to allow for triangulation of the results. This study was conducted as part of the EU-funded project DID-ACT ( https://did-act.eu ).

Both the surveys and interview data emphasized the need for content in a clinical reasoning (CR) curriculum such as “gathering, interpreting and synthesizing patient information”, “generating differential diagnoses”, “developing a diagnostic and a treatment plan” and “collaborative and interprofessional aspects of CR”. There was high agreement that case-based learning and simulations are most useful for teaching CR. Clinical and oral examinations were favored for the assessment of CR. The preferred format for a train-the-trainer (TTT)-course was blended learning. There was also some agreement between the survey and interview participants regarding contents of a TTT-course (e.g. teaching and assessment methods for CR). The interviewees placed special importance on interprofessional aspects also for the TTT-course.

Conclusions

We found some consensus on needed content, teaching and assessment methods for a student and TTT-course in CR. Future research could investigate the effects of CR curricula on desired outcomes, such as patient care.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Clinical reasoning (CR) is a universal ability that mobilizes integration of necessary fundamental knowledge while delivering high-quality patient care in a variety of contexts in a timely and effective way [ 1 , 2 ]. Daniel et al. [ 3 ] define it as a “skill, process or outcome wherein clinicians observe, collect, and interpret data to diagnose and treat patients”. CR encompasses health professionals thinking and acting in patient assessment, diagnostic, and management processes in clinical situations, taking into account the patient ‘s specific circumstances and preferences [ 4 ]. How CR is defined can vary between health professions, but there are also similarities [ 5 ]. Poor CR is associated with low-quality patient care and increases the risk of medical errors [ 6 ]. Berner and Graber [ 7 ] suggested that the rate of diagnostic error is around 15%, underlining the threat that insufficient CR ability poses to patient safety as well as increasing healthcare costs [ 8 ]. Despite the importance of CR, it appears to be rarely taught or assessed explicitly, often only parts of the CR process are covered in existing curricula, and there seems to be a lack of progression throughout curricula (e.g. [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].). Moreover, teachers are often not trained to explicitly teach CR, including explaining their own reasoning to others [ 10 , 11 , 12 ] although this appears to be an important factor in the implementation of a CR curriculum [ 15 ]. Some teachers even question whether CR can be explicitly taught [ 16 ]. Considering these findings, efforts should be made to incorporate explicit teaching of CR into health care professions curricula and training for teachers should be established based on best evidence. However, to date, little is known about what a longitudinal CR curriculum should incorporate to meet the needs of teachers and students.

Insights regarding teaching CR were provided from a global survey by Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ], who reported a need for a longitudinal CR curriculum. However, the participants in their study were mainly health professions educators, leaving the needs of students for a CR curriculum largely unknown. As students are future participants of a CR curriculum, their needs should also be investigated. Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ] also identified a lack of qualified faculty to teach CR. A train-the-trainer course for CR could help reduce this barrier to teaching CR. To the best of our knowledge, in addition to the work by Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ], no research exists yet that addresses the needs of teachers for such a course, and Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ] did not investigate their needs beyond course content. Recently, Gupta et al. [ 12 ] and Gold et al. [ 13 ] conducted needs analyses regarding clinical reasoning instruction from the perspective of course directors at United States medical schools, yet a European perspective is missing. Thus, our research questions were the following:

What aspects of clinical reasoning are currently taught and how important are they in a clinical reasoning curriculum according to teachers and students?

What methods are currently used to teach and assess clinical reasoning and which methods would be ideal according to teachers and students?

In what study year does the teaching of clinical reasoning currently begin and when should it ideally begin according to teachers and students?

How should a train-the-trainer course for teachers of clinical reasoning be constructed regarding content and format?

In this study, we used a convergent parallel mixed-methods design [ 17 ] within a pragmatic constructivist case study approach [ 18 ]. We simultaneously collected data from students and educators using online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to gain deeper insight into their needs on one particular situation [ 19 ]– the development of a clinical reasoning curriculum—to address our research questions. To help ensure that the results of the survey and the interviews could be compared and integrated, we constructed the questions for the survey and the interviews similarly with the exception that in the interviews, the questions were first asked openly. The design was parallel both in that we collected data simultaneously and also constructed the survey and interviews to cover similar topics. We chose this approach to obtain comprehensive answers to the research questions and to facilitate later triangulation [ 17 ] of the results.

Context of this study

We conducted this study within the EU-funded (Erasmus + program) project DID-ACT (“Developing, implementing, and disseminating an adaptive clinical reasoning curriculum for healthcare students and educators”; https://did-act.eu ). Institutions from six European countries (Augsburg University, Germany; Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland; Maribor University, Slovenia; Örebro University, Sweden; University of Bern, Switzerland; EDU, a higher medical education institution based in Malta, Instruct GmbH, Munich, Germany) with the support of associate partners (e.g., Prof. Steven Durning, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, USA; Mälardalen University, Sweden.) were part of this project. For further information, see https://did-act.eu/team-overview/team/ . In this project, we developed an interprofessional longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum for students in healthcare education and a train-the-trainer course for health profession educators. The current curriculum (for a description of the curriculum, see Hege et al. [ 20 ]) was also informed by this study. This study was part of the Erasmus + Knowledge Alliance DID-ACT (612,454-EPP-1–2019-1-DE-EPPKA2-KA).

Target groups

We identified two relevant target groups for this study, teachers and students, which are potential future users and participants of a train—the—trainer (TTT-) course and a clinical reasoning curriculum, respectively. The teacher group also included individuals who were considered knowledgeable regarding the current status of clinical reasoning teaching and assessment at their institutions (e.g. curriculum managers). These specific participants were individually selected by the DID-ACT project team to help ensure that they had the desired level of expertise. The target groups included different health professions from a large number of countries (see Table  1 ), as we wanted to gather insights that are not restricted to one profession.

Development of data collection instruments

Development of questions.

The questions in this study addressed the current status and needs regarding content, teaching, and assessment of clinical reasoning (CR). They were based on the questions used by Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ] and were expanded to obtain more detailed information. Specifically, regarding CR content, we added additional aspects (see Table 8 in the Appendix for details). The contents covered in this part of the study also align with the five domains of CR education (clinical reasoning concepts, history and physical examination, choosing and interpreting diagnostic tests, problem identification and management and shared decision-making) that were reported by Cooper et al. [ 14 ]. It has been shown that there are similarities between professions regarding the definition of CR (e.g. history taking or an emphasis on clinical skills), while nurses placed greater importance on a patient-centered approach [ 5 ]. We aimed to cover as many aspects of CR in the contents as possible to represent these findings. We expanded the questions on CR teaching formats to cover a broader range of formats. Furthermore, two additional assessment methods were added to the respective questions. Finally, one aspect was added to the content questions for a train-the-trainer course (see Table 8 in the Appendix ). As a lack of qualified faculty to teach CR was identified in the study by Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ], we added additional questions on the specific needs for the design of a CR train-the-trainer course beyond content. Table 8 in the Appendix shows the adaptations that we made in detail.

We discussed the questions within the interprofessional DID-ACT project team and adapted them in several iterative cycles until the final versions of the survey questionnaire and the interview guide were obtained and agreed upon. We tested the pre-final versions with think-alouds [ 21 ] to ensure that the questions were understandable and interpreted as intended, which led to a few changes. The survey questionnaires and interview-guides can be found at https://did-act.eu/results/ and accessed via links in table sections D1.1a (survey questions) and D1.1b (interview guides), respectively. Of these questions, we included only those relevant to the research questions addressed in this study. The questions included in this study can be found in the Appendix in Table8.

Teachers were asked questions about all content areas, but only the expert subgroup was asked to answer questions on the current situation regarding the teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning at their institutions, as they were considered the best informed group on the matter. Furthermore, students were not asked questions on the train-the-trainer course. Using the abovementioned procedures, we also hoped to improve the response rate as longer surveys were found to be associated with lower response rates [ 22 ].

We created two different versions of the interview guide, one for teachers and one for students. The student interview guide did not contain questions on the current status of clinical reasoning teaching and assessment or questions about the train-the-trainer course. The interview guides were prepared with detailed instructions to ensure that the interviews were conducted in a comparable manner at all locations. By using interviews, we intended to obtain a broad picture of existing needs. Individual interviews further allowed participants to speak their own languages and thus to express themselves naturally and as precisely as possible.

Reflexivity statement

Seven researchers representing different perspectives and professions form the study team. MS has been a PhD candidate representing the junior researcher perspective, while also experienced researchers with a broad background in clinical reasoning and qualitative as well as quantitative research are part of the team (SD, SH, AK, IH, ME, FW). ME represents the physiotherapist perspective, SD, SH, and MS represent the medical perspective. We discussed all steps of the study in the team and made joint decisions.

Data collection and analysis

The survey was created using LimeSurvey software (LimeSurvey GmbH). The survey links were distributed via e-mail (individual invitations, posts to institutional mailing lists, newsletters) by the DID-ACT project team and associate partners (the target groups received specific links to the online-survey). The e-mail contained information on the project and its goals. By individually contacting persons in the local language, we hoped to increase the likelihood of participation. The survey was anonymous. The data were collected from March to July 2020.

Potential interview participants were contacted personally by the DID-ACT project team members in their respective countries. We used a convenience sampling approach by personally contacting potential interview partners in the local language to motivate as many participants as possible. With this approach we also hoped to increase the likelihood of participation. The interviews were conducted in the local languages also to avoid language barriers and were audio-recorded to help with the analysis and for documentation purposes. Most interviews were conducted using online meeting services (e.g. Skype or Zoom) because of restrictions due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic that occurred with the start of data collection at the beginning of the DID-ACT project. The data were collected from March to July 2020. All interview partners provided informed consent.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We asked the Bern Ethics Committee to approve this multi-institutional study. This type of study was regarded as exempt from formal ethical approval according to the regulations of the Bern Ethics Committee (‘Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern’, decision Req-2020–00074). All participants voluntarily participated and provided informed consent before taking part in this study.

Data analysis

Descriptive analyses were performed using SPSS statistics software (version 28, 2021). Independent samples t-tests were computed for comparisons between teachers and students. When the variances of the two groups were unequal, Welch’s test was used. Bonferroni correction of significance levels was used to counteract alpha error accumulation in repeated tests. The answers to the free text questions were screened for recurring themes. There were very few free-text comments, typically repeating aspects from the closed questions, hence, no meaningful analysis was possible. For this reason, the survey comments are mentioned only where they made a unique contribution to the results.

The interviews were translated into English by the partners. An overarching summarizing qualitative content analysis [ 23 ] of the data was conducted. A summarizing content analysis is particularly useful when the content level of the material is of interest. Its goal is to reduce the material to manageable short texts in a way that retains the essential meaning [ 23 ]. The analysis was conducted first by two of the authors of the study (FW, SH) and then discussed by the entire author team. The analysis was carried out as an iterative process until a complete consensus was reached within the author team.

The results from the surveys and interviews were compared and are presented together in the results section. The qualitative data are reported in accordance with the standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQR, O’Brien et al. [ 24 ]).

Table 1 shows the professional background and country of the interviewees and survey samples. The survey was opened by 857 persons, 212 (25%) of whom answered the questions included in this study. The expert sub-group of teachers who answered the questions on the current status of clinical reasoning teaching and assessment encompassed 45 individuals.

Content of a clinical reasoning curriculum for students

The survey results show that “Gathering, interpreting, and synthesizing patient information”, is currently most extensively taught, while “Theories of clinical reasoning” are rarely taught (see Table  2 ). In accordance with these findings, “Gathering, interpreting, and synthesizing patient information” received the highest mean importance rating for a clinical reasoning curriculum while “Theories of clinical reasoning” received the lowest importance rating. Full results can be found in Table 9 in the Appendix .

Teachers and students differed significantly in their importance ratings of two content areas, “Gathering, interpreting, and synthesizing patient information” ( t (148.32) = 4.294, p  < 0.001, d  = 0.609) and “Developing a problem formulation/hypothesis” ( t (202) = 4.006, p  < 0.001, d  = 0.561), with teachers assigning greater importance to both of these content areas.

The results from the interviews are in line with those from the survey. Details can be found in Table 12 in the Appendix .

Clinical reasoning teaching methods

The survey participants reported that, most often, case-based learning is currently applied in the teaching of clinical reasoning (CR). This format was also rated as most important for teaching CR (see Table  3 ). Full results can be found in Table 10 in the Appendix .

Teachers and students differed significantly in their importance ratings of Team-based learning ( t (202) = 3.079, p  = 0.002, d  = 0.431), with teachers assigning greater importance to this teaching format.

Overall, the interviewees provided very similar judgements to the survey participants. Next to the teaching formats shown in Table  3 , some of them would employ blended learning, and clinical teaching formats such as bedside teaching and internships were also mentioned. Details can be found in the Appendix in Table 13. In addition to the importance of each individual teaching format, it was also argued that all of the formats can be useful because they all are meant to reach different objectives and that there is not one single best format for teaching CR.

Start of clinical reasoning teaching in curricula

Most teachers (52.5%) reported that currently, the teaching of clinical reasoning (CR) starts in the first year of study. Most often (46.4%) the participants also chose the first study year as the optimal year for starting the teaching CR. In accordance with the survey results, the interviewees also advocated for an early start of the teaching of CR. Some interview participants who advocated for a later start of CR teaching suggested that the students first need a solid knowledge base and that once the clinical/practical education starts, explicit teaching of CR should begin.

Assessment of clinical reasoning

The survey results suggest that currently written tests or clinical examinations are most often used, while Virtual Patients are used least often (see Table  4 ). Despite written tests being the most common current assessment format, they received the lowest importance rating for a future longitudinal CR curriculum. Full results can be found in Table 11 in the Appendix .

Teachers and students differed significantly in their importance ratings of clinical examinations ( t (161.81) = 2.854, p  = 0.005, d  = 0.413) and workplace-based assessments ( t (185) = 2.640, p = 0.009, d  = 0.386) with teachers assigning greater importance to both of these assessment formats.

The interviewees also placed importance on all assessment methods but found it difficult to assess CR with written assessment methods. The students seemed to associate clinical examinations more with practical skills than with CR. Details can be found in the Appendix in Table 14. Two of the interview participants mentioned that CR is currently not assessed at their institutions, and one person mentioned that students are asked to self-reflect on their interactions with patients and on potential improvements.

Train-the-trainer course

The following sections highlight the results from the needs analysis regarding a train-the-trainer (TTT-) course. The questions presented here were posed only to the teachers.

Most survey participants reported that there is currently no TTT- course on clinical reasoning at their institution but that they think such a course is necessary (see Table  5 ). The same was also true for the interviewees (no TTT- course on clinical reasoning existing but need for one).

In the interviews, 22 participants (78.6%) answered that a TTT-course is necessary for healthcare educators, two participants answered that no such course was necessary, and two other participants were undecided about its necessity. At none of the institutions represented by the interviewees, a TTT-course for teaching clinical reasoning exists.

When asked what the best format for a clinical reasoning TTT- course would be (single answer question), the majority of the survey participants favored a blended learning / flipped classroom approach, a combination of e-learning and face-to-face meetings. (see Table  6 ).

In the survey comments it was noted that blended-learning encompasses the benefits of both self-directed learning and discussion/learning from others. It would further allow teachers to gather knowledge about CR first in an online learning phase where they can take the time they need before coming to a face-to-face meeting.

The interviewees also found a blended-learning approach particularly suitable for a TTT-course. An e-learning course only was seen as more critical because teachers may lack motivation to participate in an online-only setting, while a one-time face-to-face meeting would not provide enough time. In some interviews, it was emphasized that teachers should experience themselves what they are supposed to teach to the students and also that the trainers for the teachers need to have solid education and knowledge on clinical reasoning.

Table 7 shows the importance ratings of potential content of a TTT-course generated from the survey. To elaborate on this content, comments by the interviewees were added. On average, all content was seen as (somewhat) important with teaching methods on the ward and/or clinic receiving the highest ratings. Some interviewees also mentioned the importance of interprofessional aspects and interdisciplinary understanding of CR. In the survey comments, some participants further expressed their interest in such a course.

Finally, the interviewees were asked about the ideal length of a clinical reasoning TTT-course. The answers varied greatly from 2–3 hours to a two-year educational program, with a tendency toward 1–2 days. Several interviewees commented that the time teachers are able to spend on a TTT-course is limited. This should be considered in the planning of such a course to make participation feasible for teachers.

In this study, we investigated the current status of and suggestions for teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning (CR) in a longitudinal curriculum as well as suggestions for a train-the-trainer (TTT-) course for CR. Teachers and students were invited to participate in online-surveys as well as semi-structured interviews to derive answers to our research questions. Regarding the contents of a CR curriculum for students, the results of the surveys and interviews were comparable and favoured content such as gathering, interpreting, and synthesizing patient information, generating differential diagnoses, and developing a diagnostic and a treatment plan. In the interviews, high importance was additionally placed on collaborative and interprofessional aspects of CR. Case-based learning and simulations were seen as the most useful methods for teaching CR, and clinical and oral examinations were favoured for the assessment of CR. The preferred format for a TTT-course was blended learning. In terms of course content, teaching and assessment methods for CR were emphasized. In addition to research from the North American region [ 11 ], this study provides results from predominantly European countries that support the existing findings.

Content of a clinical reasoning curriculum

Our results revealed that there are still aspects of clinical reasoning (CR), such as “Errors in the clinical reasoning process and strategies to avoid them” or “Interprofessional aspects of CR” that are rarely taught despite their high importance, corroborating the findings of Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ]. According to the interviewees, students should have basic knowledge of CR before they are taught about errors in the CR process and strategies to avoid them. The lack of teaching of errors in CR may also stem from a lack of institutional culture regarding how to manage failures in a constructive way (e.g. [ 16 , 25 ]), making it difficult to explicitly address errors and strategies to avoid them. Although highly relevant in the everyday practice of healthcare professions and underpinned by CR theoretical frameworks (e.g., distributed cognition [ 26 ]), interprofessional and collaborative aspects of CR are currently rarely considered in the teaching of CR. The interviews suggested that hierarchical distance and cultural barriers may contribute to this finding. Sudacka et al. [ 16 ] also reported cultural barriers as one reason for a lack of CR teaching. Generally, the interviewees seemed to place greater importance on interprofessional and collaborative aspects than did the survey-participants This may have been due to differences in the professions represented in the two modalities (e.g., a greater percentage of nurses among the interview participants, who tend to define CR more broadly than physicians [ 5 ]).

“Self-reflection on clinical reasoning performance and strategies for future improvement”, “Developing a problem formulation/hypothesis” and “Aspects of patient-participation in CR” were rated as important but are currently rarely taught, a finding not previously reported. The aspect “Self-reflection on clinical reasoning performance and strategies for future improvement”, received high importance ratings, but only 25% of the survey-participants answered that it is currently taught to a great extent. The interviewees agreed that self-reflection is important and added that ideally, it should be guided by specific questions. Ogdie et al. [ 27 ] found that reflective writing exercises helped students identify errors in their reasoning and biases that contributed to these errors.

“Gathering, interpreting, and synthesizing patient information” and “Developing a problem formulation/hypothesis” were rated significantly more important by teachers than by students. It appears that students may be less aware yet of the importance of gathering, interpreting, and synthesizing patient information in the clinical reasoning process. There was some indication in the interviews that the students may not have had enough experience yet with “Developing a problem formulation/hypothesis” or associate this aspect with research, possibly contributing to the observed difference.

Overall, our results on the contents of a CR curriculum suggest that all content is important and should be included in a CR curriculum, starting with basic theoretical knowledge and data gathering to more advanced aspects such as errors in CR and collaboration. Two other recent surveys conducted in the United States among pre-clerkship clinical skills course directors [ 12 ] and members of clerkship organizations [ 13 ] came to similar conclusions regarding the inclusion of clinical reasoning content at various stages of medical curricula. How to fit the content into already dense study programs, however, can still be a challenge [ 16 ].

In addition to case-based learning and clinical teaching, human simulated patients and Team-based learning also received high importance ratings for teaching clinical reasoning (CR), a finding not previously reported. Lectures, on the other hand, are seen as the least important to teach CR (see also Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ]), as they mainly deliver factual knowledge according to the interviewees. High-fidelity simulations (mannequins) and Virtual Patients (VPs) are rarely used to teach CR at the moment and are rated less important compared to other teaching formats. Some interviewees see high-fidelity simulations as more useful for teaching practical skills. The lower importance rating of VPs was surprising given that this format is case-based, provides a safe environment for learning, and is described in the literature as a well-suited tool for teaching CR [ 28 , 29 ]. Considering that VPs seemed to be used less often at the institutions involved in this study, the lack of experience with this format may have led to this result.

Teachers rated Team-based learning as significantly more important for teaching clinical reasoning than students. In the interviews, many students seemed not to be familiar with Team-based learning, possibly explaining the lower ratings the students gave this format in the survey.

Taken together, our results suggest that there is not one best format for teaching all aspects of clinical reasoning but rather that the use of all teaching formats is justified depending on the specific content to be taught and goals to be achieved. However, there was agreement that a safe learning environment where no patients can be harmed is preferred for teaching clinical reasoning, and that discussions should be possible.

There was wide agreement that clinical reasoning (CR) teaching should start in the first year of study in the curriculum. However, a few participants of this study argued that students first need to develop some general knowledge before CR is taught. Rencic et al. [ 11 ] reported that according to internal medicine clerkship directors, CR should be taught throughout all years of medical school, with a particular focus during the clinical teaching years. A similar remark was made by participants in a survey among pre-clerkship clinical skills course directors by Gupta et al. [ 12 ] where the current structure of some curricula (e.g. late introduction of the pathophysiology) was regarded as a barrier to introducing CR from the first year of study on [ 12 ].

Our results show that the most important format for assessing clinical reasoning (CR) that is also currently used to the greatest extent are clinical examinations (e.g. OSCE), consistent with Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ]. The interviewees emphasized that CR should ideally be assessed in a conversation or discussion where the learners can explain their reasoning. Given this argument, all assessment formats enabling a conversation are suitable for assessing CR. This is reflected in our survey results, where assessment formats that allow for a discussion with the learner received the most favourable importance ratings, including oral examinations. In agreement with Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ], we also found that written tests are currently used most often to assess CR but are rated as least important and suitable only for the assessment of some aspects of CR. Daniel et al. [ 3 ] argued that written exams such as MCQs, where correct answers have to be selected from a list of choices, are not the best representation of real practical CR ability. Thus, there still seems to be potential for improvement in the way CR is assessed.

Teachers rated clinical examinations and workplace-based assessments significantly higher than students. Based on the interviews, the students seemed to associate clinical examinations such as OSCEs more with a focus on practical skills than CR, potentially explaining their lower ratings of this format.

What a clinical reasoning train-the-trainer course should look like

Our results show a clear need for a clinical reasoning (CR) train-the-trainer course (see also Singh et al. [ 15 ]), which currently does not exist at most institutions represented in this study, corroborating findings by Kononowicz et al. [ 10 ]. A lack of adequately trained teachers is a common barrier to the introduction of CR content into curricula [ 12 , 16 ]. According to our results such a course should follow a blended learning/flipped classroom approach or consist of a series of face-to-face meetings. A blended-learning course would combine the benefits of both self-directed learning and the possibility for trainers to discuss with and learn from their peers, which could also increase their motivation to participate in such a course. An e-learning only course or a one-time face-to-face meeting were considered insufficient. The contents “Clinical reasoning strategies” and “Common errors in the clinical reasoning process” were given greater importance for the trainer-curriculum than for the students-curriculum, possibly reflecting higher expectations of trainers as “CR experts” compared with students. There was some agreement in the interviews that ideally, the course should not be too time-consuming, with participants tending towards an overall duration of 1–2 days, considering that most teachers usually have many duties and may not be able or willing to attend the course if it were too long. Lack of time was also identified as a barrier to attending teacher training [ 12 , 13 , 16 ].

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this study include its international and interprofessional participants. Furthermore, we explicitly included teachers and students as target groups in the same study, which enables a comparison of different perspectives. Members of the target groups not only participated in a survey but were also interviewed to gain in-depth knowledge. A distinct strength of this study is its mixed-methods design. The two data collection methods employed in parallel provided convergent results, with responses from the web survey indicating global needs and semi-structured interviews contributing to a deeper understanding of the stakeholder groups’ nuanced expectations and perspectives on CR education.

This study is limited in that most answers came from physicians, making the results potentially less generalizable to other professions. Furthermore, there were participants from a great variety of countries, with some countries overrepresented. Because of the way the survey-invitations were distributed, the exact number of recipients is unknown, making it impossible to compute an exact response rate. Also, the response rate of the survey was rather low for individuals who opened the survey. Because the survey was anonymous, it cannot completely be ruled out that some individuals participated in both interviews and survey. Finally, there could have been some language issues in the interview analysis, as the data were translated to English at the local partner institutions before they were submitted for further analysis.

Our study provides evidence of an existing need for explicit clinical reasoning (CR) longitudinal teaching and dedicated CR teacher training. More specifically, there are aspects of CR that are rarely taught that our participants believe should be given priority, such as self-reflection on clinical reasoning performance and strategies for future improvement and aspects of patient participation in CR that have not been previously reported. Case-based learning and clinical teaching methods were again identified as the most important formats for teaching CR, while lectures were considered relevant only for certain aspects of CR. To assess CR, students should have to explain their reasoning, and assessment formats should be chosen accordingly. There was also still a clear need for a CR train-the-trainer course. In addition to existing research, our results show that such a course should ideally have a blended-learning format and should not be too time-consuming. The most important contents of the train-the-trainer course were confirmed to be teaching methods, CR strategies, and strategies to avoid errors in the CR process. Examples exist for what a longitudinal CR curriculum for students and a corresponding train-the-trainer course could look like and how these components could be integrated into existing curricula (e.g. DID-ACT curriculum [ 20 ], https://did-act.eu/integration-guide/ or the described curriculum of Singh et al. [ 15 ]). Further research should focus on whether and to what extent the intended outcomes of such a curriculum are actually reached, including the potential impact on patient care.

Availability of data and materials

All materials described in this manuscript generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request without breaching participant confidentiality.

Connor DM, Durning SJ, Rencic JJ. Clinical reasoning as a core competency. Acad Med. 2020;95:1166–71.

Article   Google Scholar  

Young M, Szulewski A, Anderson R, Gomez-Garibello C, Thoma B, Monteiro S. Clinical reasoning in CanMEDS 2025. Can Med Educ J. 2023;14:58–62.

Google Scholar  

Daniel M, Rencic J, Durning SJ, Holmboe E, Santen SA, Lang V, Gruppen LD. Clinical reasoning assessment methods: a scoping review and practical guidance. Acad Med. 2019;94:902–12.

Scott IA. Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies. BMJ. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1860 .

Huesmann L, Sudacka M, Durning SJ, Georg C, Huwendiek S, Kononowicz AA, Schlegel C, Hege I. Clinical reasoning: what do nurses, physicians, and students reason about. J Interprof Care. 2023;37:990–8.

Norman GR, Eva KW. Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2010;44:94–100.

Berner E, Graber M. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121:2–23.

Cooper N, Da Silva AL, Powell S. Teaching clinical reasoning. In: Cooper N, Frain J, editors. ABC of clinical reasoning. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2016. p. 44–50.

Elvén M, Welin E, Wiegleb Edström D, Petreski T, Szopa M, Durning SJ, Edelbring S. Clinical reasoning curricula in health professions education: a scoping review. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205231209093 .

Kononowicz AA, Hege I, Edelbring S, Sobocan M, Huwendiek S, Durning SJ. The need for longitudinal clinical reasoning teaching and assessment: results of an international survey. Med Teach. 2020;42:457–62.

Rencic J, Trowbridge RL, Fagan M, Szauter K, Durning SJ. Clinical reasoning education at US medical schools: results from a national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:1242–6.

Gupta S, Jackson JM, Appel JL, Ovitsh RK, Oza SK, Pinto-Powell R, Chow CJ, Roussel D. Perspectives on the current state of pre-clerkship clinical reasoning instruction in United States medical schools: a survey of clinical skills course directors. Diagnosis. 2021;9:59–68.

Gold JG, Knight CL, Christner JG, Mooney CE, Manthey DE, Lang VJ. Clinical reasoning education in the clerkship years: a cross-disciplinary national needs assessment. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0273250.

Cooper N, Bartlett M, Gay S, Hammond A, Lillicrap M, Matthan J, Singh M. UK Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education (CReME) consensus statement group. Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2021;43:152–9.

Singh M, Collins L, Farrington R, Jones M, Thampy H, Watson P, Grundy J. From principles to practice: embedding clinical reasoning as a longitudinal curriculum theme in a medical school programme. Diagnosis. 2021;9:184–94.

Sudacka M, Adler M, Durning SJ, Edelbring S, Frankowska A, Hartmann D, Hege I, Huwendiek S, Sobočan M, Thiessen N, Wagner FL, Kononowicz AA. Why is it so difficult to implement a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum? A multicenter interview study on the barriers perceived by European health professions educators. BMC Med Educ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02960-w .

Hingley A, Kavaliova A, Montgomery J, O’Barr G. Mixed methods designs. In: Creswell JW, editor. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2012. p. 534–75.

Merriam SB. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. In: from" case study research in education.". Sansome St. Revised and Expanded. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1998.

Cleland J, MacLeod A, Ellaway RH. The curious case of case study research. Med Educ. 2021;55:1131–41.

Hege I, Adler M, Donath D, Durning SJ, Edelbring S, Elvén M, Wiegleb Edström D. Developing a European longitudinal and interprofessional curriculum for clinical reasoning. Diagnosis. 2023;10:218–24.

Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:229–38.

Liu M, Wronski L. Examining completion rates in web surveys via over 25,000 real-world surveys. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2018;36:116–24.

Mayring P, Fenzl T. Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. In: Baur N, Blasius J, editors. Handbuch methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2019. p. 633–48.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245–51.

Edmondson AC. Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. BMJ Qual Saf. 2004;13 Suppl 2:ii3-ii9.

Merkebu J, Battistone M, McMains K, McOwen K, Witkop C, Konopasky A, Durning SJ. Situativity: a family of social cognitive theories for understanding clinical reasoning and diagnostic error. Diagnosis. 2020;7:169–76.

Ogdie AR, Reilly JB, Pang WG, Keddem S, Barg FK, Von Feldt JM, Myers JS. Seen through their eyes: residents’ reflections on the cognitive and contextual components of diagnostic errors in medicine. Acad Med. 2012;87:1361–7.

Berman NB, Durning SJ, Fischer MR, Huwendiek S, Triola MM. The role for virtual patients in the future of medical education. Acad Med. 2016;91:1217–22.

Plackett R, Kassianos AP, Mylan S, Kambouri M, Raine R, Sheringham J. The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03410-x .

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank all participants of the interviews and survey who took their time to contribute to this study despite the ongoing pandemic in 2020. Furthermore, we thank the members of the DID-ACT project team who supported collection and analysis of survey and interview data.

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University or other Federal Agencies.

This study was partially supported by the Erasmus + Knowledge Alliance DID-ACT (612454-EPP-1–2019-1-DE-EPPKA2-KA).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute for Medical Education, Department for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

F. L Wagner & S. Huwendiek

Center of Innovative Medical Education, Department of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

A. A Kononowicz

School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden

Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA

S. J Durning

Institute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

FW and SH wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manu-script in several rounds and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. L Wagner .

Ethics declarations

This type of study was regarded as exempt from formal ethical approval according to the regulations of the Bern Ethics Committee (‘Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern’, decision Req-2020–00074). All participants voluntarily participated and provided informed consent before taking part in this study.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publication of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Wagner, F., Sudacka, M., Kononowicz, A. et al. Current status and ongoing needs for the teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning – an international mixed-methods study from the students` and teachers` perspective. BMC Med Educ 24 , 622 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05518-8

Download citation

Received : 16 January 2024

Accepted : 06 May 2024

Published : 05 June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05518-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Clinical reasoning

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

• Submission enquiries: [email protected]
• General enquiries: [email protected]